I have a page in which I have several textboxes in order to search depending the value of the textboxes,If I make the search eith only one value everithing works fine but if I try to combine 2 or more values I only get the result of the last textbox.
Here's my query hope you could help me.
var query = from m in SolContext.Menores
where ((m.Solicitud.fiIdSolicitud == rdTxtFolio.Value) || (m.Solicitud.fiAnioSolicitud == rdTxtAnioFolio.Value)
|| (m.Solicitud.CTEdoSolicitud.fcDescEdoSol == status) || (m.Solicitud.fiCircuito == cto) || (m.Solicitud.fiCiudad == cd)
|| (m.Solicitud.fcCveAdsc == adsc) || (m.Solicitud.fiExpEmpleado == rdTxtExp.Value) || (m.Solicitud.fcNomEmpleado == rdTxtNom.Text)
|| (m.Solicitud.fcPatEmpleado == rdTxtAPat.Text) || (m.Solicitud.fcMatEmpleado == rdTxtAMat.Text) || (m.fcPatMenor == rdTxtAPatMenor.Text)
|| (m.fcMatMenor == rdTxtAmatMenor.Text) || (m.fcNomMenor == rdTxtNomMenor.Text) || (m.fiSexoMenor == sexo) || (m.fiAnosMenor == rdTxtAniosMenor.Value) || (m.fiMesesMenor == rdTxtMesMenor.Value))
select m;
rgSolic.DataSource = query;
rgSolic.Rebind();
My guess is that the result of the first textbox is included in the result of the second one.
My guess is that you're using or. The first textbox that matches your value will end your search. If you want to check if it matches all your values, use and.
If that doesn't solve it, we'll need more info.
Related
I have a complex where clause in my EF linq statement which repeats a subquery expression, on _db.OPESRRecoveryElements, but with different parameters, one of which is depending on records from the main entity, OPCases/OPCaseDto.
The query as it is works, but its hard for people to read. Ideally I'd like to be able to create an expression which could be re-used at the 3 necessary points and would still allow it to execute as a single, server-side SQL statement.
Is there a way to create an Expression / IQueryable definition which can be used for a subquery like this?
List<OPCaseDto> opCases = await _db.OPCases
.ProjectTo<OPCaseDto>(_autoMapperConfig, null, requestedExpands)
.Where(c =>
c.OPStatusId == OPStatusIds.AwaitingRecoveryElement
&& (
(c.OPCategoryLetter == "B"
// Only need a gross pensionable element if there is an outstanding gross pensionable figure
&& (c.GrossOverpaidPensionable - c.GrossRecoveredPensionable == 0
|| _db.OPESRRecoveryElements.Any(e => !e.NonPensionable && e.OPRecoveryMethod.OPTypeLetter == "G"
&& !e.OPRecoveryPlans.Any(rp
=> (rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.NotStarted || rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.InRecovery)
&& rp.AssignmentNo == c.RecoveryAssignmentNo)))
// Only need a gross non-pensionable element if there is an outstanding gross non-pensionable figure
&& (c.GrossOverpaidNonPensionable - c.GrossRecoveredNonPensionable == 0
|| _db.OPESRRecoveryElements.Any(e => e.NonPensionable && e.OPRecoveryMethod.OPTypeLetter == "G"
&& !e.OPRecoveryPlans.Any(rp
=> (rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.NotStarted || rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.InRecovery)
&& rp.AssignmentNo == c.RecoveryAssignmentNo))))
|| (c.OPCategoryLetter == "D"
// Don't need to check for an outstanding net figure - if the case is net and isn't complete, there will be one!
&& _db.OPESRRecoveryElements.Any(e => e.OPRecoveryMethod.OPTypeLetter == "N"
&& !e.OPRecoveryPlans.Any(rp
=> (rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.NotStarted || rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.InRecovery)
&& rp.AssignmentNo == c.RecoveryAssignmentNo)))
)
)
.AsNoTracking()
.ToListAsync();
If it wasn't for the c.RecoveryAssignmentNo part, I could easily create an expression like:
public Expression<Func<OPESRRecoveryElement, bool>> NoActiveRecoveryPlans(string opType, bool nonPen)
{
return e => e.OPRecoveryMethod.OPTypeLetter == opType
&& e.NonPensionable == nonPen
&& !e.OPRecoveryPlans.Any(rp
=> (rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.NotStarted || rp.RecoveryStatus == OPRecoveryStatuses.InRecovery));
}
and use it like:
(c.OPCategoryLetter == "B"
// Only need a gross pensionable element if there is an outstanding gross pensionable figure
&& (c.GrossOverpaidPensionable - c.GrossRecoveredPensionable == 0
|| _db.OPESRRecoveryElements.Any(NoActiveRecoveryPlans("G", false)))
and it would get executed before the query to get the OPCases.
I could also fetch all the OPCaseDto records and OPESRRecoveryElements as separate queries and filter in memory, but I don't want to do that.
If I add a parameter to the function, string assignmentNo, I (unsurprisingly) get an error - "Unable to cast object of type 'System.Linq.Expressions.InstanceMethodCallExpression3' to type 'System.Linq.Expressions.LambdaExpression'"
I have a query that in T-SQL it is
SELECT *
FROM rpm_scrty_rpm_usr ru
WHERE ru.inact_ind = 'N'
AND email_id IS NOT NULL
AND wwid IS NULL
AND LTRIM(RTRIM (email_id)) <> ''
AND dflt_ste_id NOT IN (25,346,350,352,353,354,355,357,358,366,372,411)
When I have been converting it to LINQ, I have everything except the "NOT IN"
var querynonSystem = (from ru in Rpm_scrty_rpm_usrs
where ru.Inact_ind == "N" && ru.Email_id != null && ru.Wwid == null && ru.Email_id.Trim() != ""
&& ru.Dflt_ste_id != 25
select ru).Count();
I did temporarily put in this line && ru.Dflt_ste_id != 25
However I need to have AND dflt_ste_id NOT IN (25,346,350,352,353,354,355,357,358,366,372,411)
I am seeing a lot of different code like
this lambda where !(list2.Any(item2 => item2.Email == item1.Email))
Then var otherObjects = context.ItemList.Where(x => !itemIds.Contains(x.Id));
For my linq query, how can I do this Not In in simple manner?
You can use Contains with !. In addition, if you just want to count rows, you can use Count.
var ids = new List<int> {25, 346, 350, 352, 353, 354, 355, 357, 358, 366, 372, 411};
var querynonSystem = XXXcontext.Rpm_scrty_rpm_usrs.Count(x =>
x.Inact_ind == "N" &&
x.Email_id != null &&
x.Wwid == null &&
x.Email_id.Trim() != "" &&
!ids.Contains(x.Dflt_ste_id));
From comment: if you want to retrieve all, you can still use Where and Select.
var querynonSystem = XXXcontext.Rpm_scrty_rpm_usrs.Where(x =>
x.Inact_ind == "N" &&
x.Email_id != null &&
x.Wwid == null &&
x.Email_id.Trim() != "" &&
!ids.Contains(x.Dflt_ste_id)).Select(x => x).ToList();
FYI: you cannot call Rpm_scrty_rpm_usrs table class to query. Instead, you need DbContext or some other repository.
There is no "not in" operator unless the type of the query is the same as the type you want to filter against (in which case you could use except). Here it is not. You're working on an IEnumerable and you want to filter on it's ID so a list of int. The where with lambda and contains is your best bet and WILL be translated to an in on the SQL side by most providers.
var FilterIds = new List<int>{1,2,3,4,344,3423525};
var querynonSystem = (from ru in Rpm_scrty_rpm_usrs
where ru.Inact_ind == "N" && ru.Email_id != null && ru.Wwid == null && ru.Email_id.Trim() != ""
&& ru.Dflt_ste_id != 25
select ru)
// Use this
.Where(ru=>!FilterIds.Any(id=>ru.dflt_ste_id ==id))
// Or this
.Where(ru=>!FilterIds.Contains(ru.dflt_ste_id))
.Count();
i want to do the following IF statement,
if (checkID.Equals(Convert.ToInt32(txtCheck.Text))
&& drop == 319020000
|| currentFloor[id][0].checkFlag == 1)
what i want to check here it the following thing:
i want to check if this whole statement is true
checkID.Equals(Convert.ToInt32(txtCheck.Text)) && drop == 319020000`
or this statment:
currentFloor[id][0].checkFlag == 1
If 1 of them is true it should go inside the loop.
What am i doing wrong here?
Use parentheses, you have many operators at the same level and precedence may be killing you
if ((checkID.Equals(Convert.ToInt32(txtCheck.Text)) && drop == 319020000)
|| currentFloor[id][0].checkFlag == 1)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa691323(v=vs.71).aspx
;)
you have to use additional parentheses like follows,
if ((checkID.Equals(Convert.ToInt32(txtCheck.Text)) && drop == 319020000) || currentFloor[id][0].checkFlag == 1)
In one of my pages I need to check if the entered information about a customer consists duplicate PAN NO,Email,Mobile No which may have been entered previously.Currently I am trying it using this Linq To SQL statement
var duplicate = (from dup in dt.Data_Customer_Logs
where dup.cPanGirNo == panno
|| dup.cEmail == email
|| dup.nMobileNo.ToString() == mobno
select dup).Any();
It is working but can anyone help me as to what is the correct method to solve my issue.Also if there are no records found what would be the result.
Any suggestions are welcome.
bool duplicateExists = dt.Data_Customer_Logs.Any(x =>
x.cPanGirNo == panno
|| x.cEmail == email
|| x.nMobileNo.ToString() == mobno);
This is a tad cleaner if you just want to know if such records exist or not. And I think it will avoid bringing back multiple records to the client side and then doing IEnumerable<T>.Any on the results.
If you need to also get back the records that match the criteria, you can use IQueryable<T>.Where:
var duplicates = dt.Data_Customer_Logs.Where(x =>
x.cPanGirNo == panno
|| x.cEmail == email
|| x.nMobileNo.ToString() == mobno);
if(duplicates.Any())
{
// use duplicates...
foreach(var dup in duplicates)
{
//use dup.cEmail, dup.nMobileNo, etc.
try this
var duplicate = (from dup in dt.Data_Customer_Logs
where dup.cPanGirNo == panno
|| dup.cEmail == email
|| dup.nMobileNo.ToString() == mobno
select dup).FirstOrDefault();
if(duplicate != null && duplicate.Any())
//here logic of what should happend if there is something in db
Let's say you have a List l_mur = new List();
And you populate the list.
Then based on conditions you want to REMOVE some values without requerying...
l_mur.RemoveAt(l_mur.FindIndex(f => (f.xid == tmur.xid && f.sid == tmur.sid && f.mid == tmur.mid && f.bid == tmur.bid)));
However, the code I used here, does not seem to work. It tells me index out of range, but how can it be out of range if I am just searching for something that truly does exist.
List<T>.FindIndex() returns -1 in case there is no match found - which is out of range for List<T>.RemoveAt().
Also note that FindIndex() only returns the index of the first occurrence based on your predicate - if there is more than one match you will only be able to delete the first one of them with your current approach.
A better approach to delete in place based on a predicate would be RemoveAll():
l_mur.RemoveAll(f => (f.xid == tmur.xid && f.sid == tmur.sid && f.mid == tmur.mid && f.bid == tmur.bid));
May be a good idea is to filter the list to a new instance of the list:
var l_mur = l_mur.Where(f => (f.xid != tmur.xid || f.sid != tmur.sid || f.mid != tmur.mid || f.bid != tmur.bid));
Use this code:
l_mur.Remove(l_mur.Find(f => (f.xid == tmur.xid && f.sid == tmur.sid && f.mid == tmur.mid && f.bid == tmur.bid)));