I have created a simple REST web service.. Responses are like
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ArrayOfTableCategories xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
using this attribute
[XmlSerializerFormat]
However I see no xmlns there... like tempuri...
but when try to make a request I get 400 error if I don't define xmlns="http://tempuri.org" at root element..
Any explanation for this behavior?
This is the same problem as in your last 2 questions.
We have often seen that a WCF service is not able to have a List as a return parameter.
Follow the answer that I gave in this question: Cannot deserialize with XMLSerializer result from WCF webservice
Related
i am currently building a Client to communicate with a Gateway of a Charge Point.
The communication is build with OcppV1.5 over Soap & Http.
The Server doesn't accept my request. I get a Http Response 500 with the Error Reason:
"XML Request is not well formed, Action does not exist."
I looked into the wsdl files but I just don't understand why it doesn't accept my action.
My Request looks something like this:
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:wsa="https://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing" xmlns:cs="urn://Ocpp/Cp/2012/06/">
<SOAP-ENV:Header>
<cs:chargeBoxIdentity>0000.0000</cs:chargeBoxIdentity>
<wsa:From>
<wsa:Address>http://000.000.000.000:0000</wsa:Address>
</wsa:From>
<wsa:To>http://000.000.000.001:0001</wsa:To>
<wsa:Action>/ChangeConfiguration</wsa:Action>
<wsa:MessageID>00000.000000000000</wsa:MessageID>
</SOAP-ENV:Header>
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<cs:changeConfigurationRequest>
<cs:key>MeterValueSampleInterval</cs:key>
<cs:value>60</cs:value>
</cs:changeConfigurationRequest>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
Update:
As Bogdan suggested I tried to send the same message using SoapUi and it worked. The generated Request from SoapUi looks like this:
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:ns="urn://Ocpp/Cp/2012/06/">
<soap:Header xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
<ns:chargeBoxIdentity>000000.00000</ns:chargeBoxIdentity>
<wsa:Action>/ChangeConfiguration</wsa:Action>
<wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:Address>http://000.000.000.000:0000</wsa:Address>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:MessageID>uuid:00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</wsa:MessageID>
<wsa:To>http://000.000.000.000:00000/</wsa:To>
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body>
<ns:changeConfigurationRequest>
<ns:key>MeterValueSampleInterval</ns:key>
<ns:value>300</ns:value>
</ns:changeConfigurationRequest>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
It's hard to tell from what you posted why you are getting an error, so I can only add some information that can hopefully allow you to troubleshoot the issue.
Your message has WS-Addressing headers, <wsa:Action> being one of them. The value of this field should be specified in the WSDL if your WSDL also includes WS-Addressing Metadata information, or should be specified in the documentation of the web service you are invoking. Your error message "XML Request is not well formed, Action does not exist" seems to indicate that there might be an issue with this field, but there is another action that SOAP services have which is a SOAP action. I asked about it in the comment above to make sure it's eliminated as a source of problems. In SOAP 1.1 it's called SOAPAction and is a separate HTTP header, while in SOAP 1.2 it's an action parameter on the HTTP Content-Type header. Based on the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope namespace, you have a SOAP 1.2 message.
With these explanations layed out, I suggest you take the WSDL and feed it to SoapUI who can generate sample requests that you can use to invoke the web service. If the WSDL also contains WS-Addressing Metadata, SoapUI should be able to pick it up and help you fill in the values you need. If not, look again through the WSDL for Action elements (make sure you differentiate between the SOAP Action and the WS-Addressing Action using their XML namespaces) or through the service documentation.
Once you get a succesfull call using SoapUI, then try to duplicate it with your code. At that point you can again use SoapUI to troubleshoot things and inspect your code built message to see it resembles the one you can successfully send with SoapUI.
Hope this helps get you closer to a resolution.
Hi I am developing web application which contains Siebel web service integration. All request/response cycle will take place through XML. It is basically SOAP service. I do not have idea on siebel and soap xml. I am trying to integrate siebel service in WebAPi2. Client have provided me request and response and created sample service to test. I am able to invoke siebel service in fidler. In my webapi2 i want to integrate service.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rol="Some Url">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<rol:process>
<rol:IDType>National Id</rol:IDType>
<rol:Type>Customer</rol:Type>
// other parametrs
</rol:process>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Below is the response
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
<env:Header>
<wsa:MessageID>urn:some id</wsa:MessageID>
<wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:Address>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:Address>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:FaultTo>
<wsa:Address>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:Address>
</wsa:FaultTo>
</env:Header>
<env:Body>
<processResponse xmlns="some url">
<result>1-198A3H</result>
<Contact_Integration_Id>1-198A3H</Contact_Integration_Id>
<SIEBEL_ERROR_CODE/>
<SIEBEL_ERRROR_MESSAGE/>
</processResponse>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>)
Also they have provided Public url to hit the API.
As i do not know Siebel integration in .Net and i did not find any suitable tutorial I am expecting some help from here. Any help/suggestion i get here highly appreciated. Thank you.
Although #AJPerez is correct that this is not really a Siebel issue, I would like to recommend you request for the WSDL (Web Service Definition file) from which your example message is generated. Without it you'll find it hard to use the generic .NET tutorials regarding web services.
.NET has no doubt a generator that takes a WSDL as input and generates a set of classes and functions for you to use.
I have developed a web service in ASP.NET using C#. One of its web methods returns a complex type created from an xsd schema file using the xsd command.
Many client devices use this web services without a problem. WindowsMobile, PC. All are .Net applications.
Now one VB6 client needs to use this web service using SOAP Toolkit 3.0 and he has a problem probably due to the for different namespaces in the serialized xml data.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soap:Envelope
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<GetProductionDataMachineryResponse xmlns="http://myFactory.it/">
<GetProductionDataMachineryResult xmlns="http://tempuri.org/XMLSchemaData.xsd">
<ResultRequest>Ok or No Data Found </ResultRequest>
.....
</GetProductionDataMachineryResult>
</GetProductionDataMachineryResponse>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
If I remove the following annotations in the .cs file
[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute(Namespace="http://tempuri.org/XMLSchemaData.xsd")]
[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRootAttribute(Namespace="http://tempuri.org/XMLSchemaData.xsd", IsNullable=false)]
the VB6 client works fine. But the other clients need to update the web reference.
There are over 80 other clients so this is not an attractive option.
Is there a way to get this to work with the new client without breaking the old ones?
I am attempting to get specific information from the user's profile via the LinkedIn API.
The URL I am using for the GET call is the following:
http://api.linkedin.com/v1/people/~:(id,first-name,last-name,industry,headline,public-profile-url)
When attempting this I get a "401 Unauthorized" response from the server. However, when I do a GET to http://api.linkedin.com/v1/people/~ within the same function with the same auth keys, etc. it works just fine.
The error presented in the response is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<error>
<status>401</status>
<timestamp>1316082986700</timestamp>
<request-id>SVWTG5ARQM</request-id>
<error-code>0</error-code>
<message>[unauthorized].</message>
</error>
Any ideas of why this might be happening? Anything would be greatly appreciated.
It is likely your OAuth library is buggy. Can you view the full request and response?
I would make sure your Authorization / OAuth header has the same signature as the one generated from this tool:
https://developer.linkedin.com/oauth-test-console
If not, you'll need to get a new library, update/fix your library, etc.
If yes, then that is weird. Come back and we'll go from there :)
There is a series of SOAP services which I wish to call (across a series of services), and while the end points are well defined & documented, there is no WSDL data... so I decided to build my own.
In order to do so, I built a test WCF service which matches the known interface of the service I wish to call.
I then saved the WSDL it exposed, changed the base address the WSDL references, created my proxy (with wsdl.exe), added it to a test client project, and can successfully create a proxy and make calls which causes the SOAP service to send the expected response... only this expected response is not picked up by the proxy and returned to the calling code.
When looking at the back and forth traffic... I can clearly see that the service is replying with what I want.
Any suggestions as to how I might troubleshoot this and get the proxy to pickup the data?
Given the replies are effectively identical, I'm forced to look back at the differences between what my client is sending and another sends.
A known working app sends it's XML blob starting with the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Envelope s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
While my client immediately starts with the envelope (without the xml tag, and with one less namespace):
<s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
The other difference is that the message within the body is prefixed by a namespace in theirs, while mine it is not... though both define this namespace within the tag.
Ala:
<s:Body>
<u:DoSomething xmlns:u="urn:http://some.namespace.org" />
</s:Body>
VS:
<s:Body>
<DoSomething xmlns="urn:http://some.namespace.org" />
</s:Body>
This is not a namespace:
s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
It's setting the encoding style for the envelope which, even though it's not required per the SOAP spec, may be required by the specific implementation you're talking to. Do you have enough control over what you're sending from the client to get that put on there?
Other than that, the XML PI is not required and I think you're definitely on the right track looking at the body XML. This is almost always the case of some kind of namespace mismatch somewhere. Are you 100% positive the namespace URIs are identical?
The most likely problem is the VS version using a "default" XML namespace. There are soap parsers that I've worked which don't work correctly when using an un-aliased (default) namespaces. If you know using the u: alias works with the service, your proxy should also generate it even when every tag inside the s:Body element is prefixed with the alias.