We Keep Coding

ASP.Net Razor C# Variables Accessible to All Pages

For starters, please forgive me and please correct me on my terminology. I am quite sure of the correct words to use for what I am trying to accomplish.
I have been given the task of building an ASP.Net Razor web site. It is something new to me. I am very proficient in PHP and ASP Classic. What I need to be able to figure out is how to declare a variable that is accessible everywhere. I do not know if in the .net world you call it a global variable or application variable or something else. But, here is how I would do this in Classic ASP.
In Classic ASP, I would have a file named VarFunct.asp. It would be the file that I declare my variables and have various functions I would access from anywhere. I would include the VarFunct.asp file on all of my pages. Anyway this is what I am really trying to do (written in how I would do it in Classic ASP)…
SelLoc = Request("SelLoc")
If Len(Trim(SelLoc)) = 0 Then
SelLoc = "All"
End If
In this case, Request("SelLoc") could be Request.QueryString or Request.Form. Then anywhere in my website I could use the variable SelLoc. So, in short... I need to be able to set a variable. Check to see if it is set by Request.Form, if not, check Request.QueryString, if not set the value to “All”. How do I write this? And where do I put it?
When I created the website using Visual Studio 2012, I selected ASP.NET Web Site (Razor V2).
This seems like it should be such a basic fundamental task of any website that has any kind of server side programming, but trying to find information and documentation online is near impossible, but probably because I am not using the correct terms for my question. I have not found any Razor tutorials that talk about setting variables that can be used globally across the website.
If someone could please help me out here by either telling me what I need to do or point me to a good tutorial, that would be great.

what you are looking for is called Static Class/Member
This will allow you to store and share data for the whole application.
BUT! since web server is multi-threaded, you wouldn't want to do this or else you might run into the case where the data is overwritten by another request before you finished the current one.
If you need to pass data from controller to your View you can use ViewBag dynamic object
If you need to use the data anywhere else (for example in a helper class) then do
HttpContext.Current.Application["VariableName"] = something
It is basically a dictionary and each request will have a different Application object

There are several ways of doing this.
For your example I would assume that this particular variable can be different for different users that are using the application at the same time. This is more of a Session scope than Application scope.
In this case you could simply use inheritance and make a base controller and/or base view model class that all your other controllers and/or view models inherit from. This way you can pass it back and forth between the view and controller and read/update it whenever you need to.
You could also use the Request and HttpContext and Session objects that are built into asp.net, if they fit your need. A brief overview of some of their functionality can be found here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-pages/overview/api-reference/asp-net-web-pages-api-reference --- google searching specific ones yields tons of results.
If you truly want Application scope, you can of course use a static class for you utilize static methods. Then you don't need to include the class in every other class, but you would need to fully name qualify the method when you call it.
I would not recommend static variables at this level though. I can't imagine very many things that would need to change for every single user that you would change while the application instance is running. Most of these sorts of items that we use are caches (generally db lookups and such, that we don't want to retrieve from the db each time, and RARELY get updated). If you utilize caches, be very aware of your thread safety when updating them. Here is an msdn on caching: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa478965.aspx --- Or application configuration settings, like the application environment. We pull most of those from a config file, and they are read only, we don't change them within a running instance of the application.

Configuration per Service Fabric Instance

I'm designing a service fabric stateless service, which requires configuration data for each instance. My initial thought was creating named partitions, and using PartitionInfo to get the named key, with a shared read only dictionary to load settings per instance. Problem is, now accessing this instance internally (From other services) requires a partition key. Since all partitions using this method will serve the same data internally, it doesn't matter which partition I connect to (I'd want it to be random). So, this gives me many possible ways to fix this problem:
Accessing the partitions (in my attempt above) randomly using ServiceProxy.Create.
The following solutions that don't involve partitions:
A configuration based per instance. This post doesn't give much help in coming up with a solution. A configuration section unique to each instance would be the most ideal solution.
Create named instances, and use the name as the username (Basically attach a string to a non-partitioned instance)
Get an instance by index, and use the index against a shared read-only dictionary to get the username.
Somehow use InitializationData (See this post) to get a username string (If InitializationData can be unique per instance).
All of the above will solve my issue. Is any of these ways possible?
EDIT: An example of a service I'm trying to create:
Let's say we have a stackoverflow question service (SOQS for short). For the sake of this example, let's say that one user can be connected to stackoverflow's websocket at any one time. SOQS internal methods (Published to my service fabric) has one method: GetQuestions(). Each SOQS would need to connect to stackoverflow with a unique username/password, and as new questions are pushed through the websocket, they added to an internal list of questions. SOQS's GetQuestions() method (Called internally from my service fabric), would then give the same question list. I can then load balance by adding more instances (As long as I have more username/passwords) and the load internally to my fabric could then be distributed. I could call ServiceProxy.Create<SOQS>() to connect to a random instance to get my question list.

It sounds like what you are looking for to have a service type that has multiple actors with each actor having its own configuration. They wouldn't be multiple copies of the same service with unique configurations, it would be one (with replicas of course) instance of the service as a singleton, and individual actors for each instance.
As an example you could have the User Service (guessing what it is since you mention username string) read from some external storage mechanism the list of usernames and longs for instance ids for each to use for internal tracking. The service would then create an actor for each, with its own configuration information. Then the User Service would be the router for messaging to and from the individual actors.

I'm not entirely sure that this is what you're looking for, but one alternative might be to create an additional configuration service to provide the unique configs per instance. On startup of your stateless service, you simply request a random (or non-random) configuration object such as a json string, and bootstrap the service during initialization. That way, you don't have to mess with partitions, since each stateless instance will fire it's own Startup.cs (or equivalent).

Best way to store data (single object) in Web API project without database

My project group and I are to develop a generic workflow system, and have decided to implement a single Node (a task in the workflow) as a C# Visual Studio Web API project (Using the ASP.NET MVC structure).
In the process of implementing a Node's logic, we've come across the trouble of how to store data in our Node. Our Node specifically consists of a few lists of Uri's leading to other Nodes as well as some status/state boolean values. These values are currently stored in a regular class but with all the values as internal static fields.
We're wondering if there's a better way to do this? Particularly, as we'd like to later apply a locking-mechanism, it'd be prefereable to have an object that we can interact with, however we are unsure of how we can access this "common" object in various Controllers - or rather in a single controller, which takes on the HTTP requests that we receive for ou Node.
Is there a way to make the Controller class use a modified constructor which takes this object? And if so, the next step: Where can we provide that the Controller will receive the object in this constructor? There appears to be no code which instantiates Web API controllers.
Accessing static fiels in some class seems to do the trick, data-wise, but it forces us to implement our own locking-mechanism using a boolean value or similar, instead of simply being able to lock the object when it is altered.
If I am not making any sense, do tell. Any answers that might help are welcome! Thanks!

Based on your comments, I would say the persistence mechanism you are after is probably one of the server-side caching options (System.Runtime.Caching or System.Web.Caching).
System.Runtime.Caching is the newer of the 2 technologies and provides the an abstract ObjectCache type that could potentially be extended to be file-based. Alternatively, there is a built-in MemoryCache type.
Unlike a static method, caches will persist state for all users based on a timeout (either fixed or rolling), and can potentially have cache dependencies that will cause the cache to be immediately invalidated. The general idea is to reload the data from a store (file or database) after the cache expires. The cache protects the store from being hit by every request - the store is only hit after the timeout is reached or the cache is otherwise invalidated.
In addition, you can specify that items are "Not Removable", which will make them survive when an application pool is restarted.
More info: http://bartwullems.blogspot.com/2011/02/caching-in-net-4.html

Share list across multiple instance of an application

I'd like to have a List<int> that multiple instances of my application can access. At the moment I can cheat and use a global mutex but that hardly would work well after 10K ints. How do I get multiple instances of a program to share a list?

An easy way to do that is to put this data in a custom windows service.
Host in this service the data you want to share and provide access to this data using any kind of IPC. The simplest is WCF.
Another method may consists in having only one instance of the application. Instead of having on form in your app, manage multiple forms as separate "pseudo" instances. When firing the app again, check if the app is already launched and trigger a message to this app.
Lastly, as Raja suggest, use a queue to share data between apps. But this requires more information about how and when the list is populated.

Share an instance between multiple projects

I am working in VS 2008 C# and need to share an instance of an object created in one project with another project. I tried creating a static class in project1 and adding it as a link to project2, but the information wasn't saved. The static class was written in project1.
//object o = new object
//project1.staticObject = o
//project2.object = project1.staticObject
When I tried something like above, project2.object would be null. By adding a class as a link, is it creating a new instance of the static class in project2 or is it referencing the same class? If it is referencing the same class, shouldn't any information saved into the static class from project1 be accessible by project2? I know this isn't the most elegant manner of sharing data, but if anyone would help with this problem or provide a better manner of doing it, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance.

Projects run in separate processes, so they can't share data in this manner. You'll need to persist the data in another type of store. I recommend using a database (hey, 20 gazillion websites, stock trading apps, airlines, etc can't be wrong).
If you don't want to use a database, you could open an IP connection between instances of the app and have a thread send packets of data to sync back and forth between the applications. Or, in your "server" app, add a web service that each process would call to update and retrieve information.
If you need really high-speed communication between the processes, sockets with a peer or star topology is a good way to go. If you're okay with some latency, having a web service (which works fine even if these aren't web apps) or a database could be a good solution. The right approach depends on your application.
WCF could also solve this problem. It effectively wraps the IP/socket layer and provides some nice object persistence/remote control capabilities, but I find it overly complex for most applications.

To share a single instance of an object among different processes (that's what I think you are intending to do) you need something that will maintain that object's state. You can look at the WCF and how to set up it's behaviour to act as a singleton so essentially every requester gets the same instance across the board.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163590.aspx

Creating the link creates only applies to the source code. When you compile each project, it then has that single class definition available in both projects. The process you took does nothing for instances during runtime for sharing.
You can look at WCF or .NET Remoting, although .NET Remoting is now officially replaced by WCF.

If you are talking about sharing the same object between two processes, you can do that, the concept is called memory-mapped files. Here is some starter docs from msdn.
Though the docs and API use the term "FileMapping" quite a bit, you can use it just for sharing memory between two processes.
In .NET 4.0, you can use the System.IO.MemoryMappedFiles namespace. For your case, looks like .NET 3.5, you'll have to use some sort of interop to use the Win API.