I need to get up to speed with some intermediate things in WPF and I'm building this small application as my learning grounds.
I have a collection of five pictures. Each picture has certain data tied to it: owner, date, size, etc.
I'd like to be able to click that picture and load that information into display in the same window. I do NOT want to load the information in a new opened window.
Any suggestions on what to search for, or even a small verbal walk through of the process?
I'm using a Frame to load the initial five picture, but I don't know how to capture the click on the main parent window if the click is being registered inside the user control.
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="22" />
<RowDefinition />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Menu Grid.Row="0">
<MenuItem Header="_File" />
<MenuItem Header="_Edit" />
<MenuItem Header="_View" />
<MenuItem Header="_Help" />
</Menu>
<Frame Grid.Row="1" Name="contentFrame" Source="Roster.xaml" />
</Grid>
Then in Roster.xaml:
<UserControl x:Class="OracleOfLegends.Roster"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
//Lots of goodies here.
</UserControl>
You never mentioned about you Model Object ... so i will assume it as
Model
public class MyPicture : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string url;
private string name;
// Other fields
public Url
{
get{ return value;}
set{url=value;}
OnPropertyChanged("Url")
}
}
//Do same for other fields . I leave the implementation if INPC on you
ViewModel MyPictureListViewModel
public MyPictureListViewModel:INotifyPropertyChanged
{
ObservableCollection<MyPictureList> picList;
public PicList
{
get{return value;}
set{piclist=value;}
OnPropertyChanged("PicList")
}
//Fill the list with some methods... it depends on you
}
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MyUserControl.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class PicListDisplay
{
private readonly MyPictureListViewModel
myPictureListViewModel;
/// <summary>
/// PicListDisplay
/// </summary>
public PicListDisplay()
{
myPictureListViewModel= new MyPictureListViewModel();
this.DataContext = myPictureListViewModel;
InitializeComponent();
}
}
I would prefer to use ListView
<ListView Name="myPicListView" ItemsSource={Binding PicList}>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<Datatemplate>
<UserControls:Roster/>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
// Here i am just Displaying the name you can put any control you want
<StackPanel DataContext="{Binding Path=SelectedItem,Elementname=myPicListView}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Name}"></TextBlock>
</StackPanel> </UserControl>
Here i have made a listView and then on selecting the listview you can get the Data On the same window.... also you can create you Own view like that of Windows Explorer or else and use inside a list View
You can do pretty much the same thing in WPF using a Frame which you can navigate to a new UserControl containing the information.
Related
I have a property in a view model which I would like to be able to set via the XAML but I can't figure out how to do it.
I have a pretty basic user control (containing a list of items), two of which are to be placed on a page and I would like to be able to set one to be a 'Source' (defined by an enum) and one to be a 'Target'.
[The code below has been stripped down quite a bit so apologies if I've accidentally made some mistakes or missed something out.]
My enumeration is:
public enum ConversionSide
{
Source, // Convert something FROM whatever is here.
Target // Convert something TO whatever is here.
}
I have a page which looks like this:
<Page
x:Class="MyApp.Views.ConverterPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:models="using:MyApp.Models"
xmlns:my="using:MyApp.Controls"
xmlns:prismMvvm="using:Prism.Windows.Mvvm"
prismMvvm:ViewModelLocator.AutoWireViewModel="True"
Style="{StaticResource PageStyle}"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="1*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="1*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<my:SelectorPage Name="SourceSelector" Grid.Column="0" />
<my:SelectorPage Name="TargetSelector" Grid.Column="1" />
</Grid>
</Page>
...where SelectorPage is a user control (I've called it a 'Page' to make the Prism AutoWire work but that's not the issue here) containing a list of items (all working fine) which looks like this...
<UserControl
x:Class="MyApp.Controls.SelectorPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:models="using:MyApp.Models"
xmlns:my="using:MyApp.Controls"
xmlns:prismMvvm="using:Prism.Windows.Mvvm"
prismMvvm:ViewModelLocator.AutoWireViewModel="True"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<ListView
Grid.Column="0"
ItemsSource="{x:Bind ViewModel.MyList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind ViewModel.MySelectedItem, Mode=TwoWay}">
<ListView.Header>
<TextBlock Margin="0,8,0,8" HorizontalAlignment="Center" FontStyle="Italic" Text="Header Text" />
</ListView.Header>
<ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListViewItem">
<Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch" />
</Style>
</ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="models:MyListItem">
<my:MyListItemTemplate />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
</UserControl>
..with code behind as...
public sealed partial class SelectorPage : UserControl
{
private SelectorViewModel ViewModel => DataContext as SelectorViewModel;
public SelectorPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
}
}
SelectorViewModel looks like this...
public class SelectorViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private ConversionSide _side;
public ConversionSide Side
{
get { return _side; }
set { SetProperty(ref _side, value); }
}
// Many lines have been omitted for 'clarity'.
}
I would like to be able to set the Side property of SelectorViewModel in XAML like this...
<my:SelectorPage Name="SourceSelector" Grid.Column="0" Side="Source" />
<my:SelectorPage Name="TargetSelector" Grid.Column="1" Side="Target" />
(Once Side has been set, I do not expect it to ever change.)
How can I do this?
I've looked at using a dependency property but I can't get it to change the property in SelectorViewModel. When I add one in SelectorPage it's visible in the XAML and I can set it but it doesn't actually do anything so I'm probably not using it right. Putting a dependency property in the view model doesn't sound right to me but I could be wrong.
I've had a look around the web - Microsoft documentation, blogs, articles, stack overflow, etc. - but I can't find anything that explains things well enough for me to figure out what I'm supposed to do. The writings I've found seem to be exclusively about getting information from a bound property - which I'm okay with - but what I'm after is setting a property from the XAML.
Can anyone give my any clues please? I don't know if I'm just a tiny step away from getting what I want or if I'm miles away.
This would set the Side property of the SelectorPage control to Source:
A view sets the property of a view model by two-way bind to it. For example, the following TextBox sets the string property of a view model called Test when you change the text in the TextBox:
<TextBox Text="{Binding Test, Mode=TwoWay}" />
So setting the property of a view model from the view typically applies to controls that handles some kind of input. Any default value of a source property should be defined in the view model:
private ConversionSide _side = ConversionSide.Source;
You shouldn't define the default values in the view.
I'm using a Messenger class in order to send data between view models. There is an AppView that hosts two main views in a content control, and up until now have had no issue with sending/receiving data this way.
Issue:
Now I added a ProductView that shows a separate dialog to the AppView. But when I call Messenger.Default.Send<ProductModel>(SelectedProduct); after calling .ShowDetailDialog() this blocks the Send code call, until the dialog is closed.
I tried the other way around, calling the Send code first, then opening the dialog. But this means that the message handler in the receiving VM doesn't register in time before the message is sent.
Does anyone know of a solution, to prevent the dialog from blocking the send call? Or alternatively register the ProductVM message handler prior to sending message and showing dialog?
Below is a summary of the related classes:
CustomerOrdersVM (sending code):
private void EditOrder(object obj)
{
_dialogService.ShowDetailDialog();
Messenger.Default.Send<ProductModel>(SelectedProduct);
}
ProductVM (receiving code):
public ProductViewModel()
{
Messenger.Default.Register<ProductModel>(this, OnSelectedProductReceived);
}
DialogService:
class DialogService : IDialogService
{
Window productView = null;
public DialogService()
{
}
public void ShowDetailDialog()
{
productView = new ProductView();
productView.ShowDialog();
}
}
AppVM (Main VM's are registered, ProductVM is independent of this VM):
public ApplicationViewModel()
{
// Add available pages
PageViewModels.Add(new CustomerDetailsViewModel(customerDataService, countryDataService, dialogService));
PageViewModels.Add(new CustomerOrdersViewModel(orderDataService, dialogService));
PageViewModels.Add(new OrderStatisticsViewModel());
// Set starting page
CurrentPageViewModel = PageViewModels[0];
}
AppView: (holds the AppVM views):
<Window x:Class="MongoDBApp.Views.ApplicationView"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:views="clr-namespace:MongoDBApp.Views"
xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:MongoDBApp.ViewModels">
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:CustomerDetailsViewModel}">
<views:CustomerDetailsView />
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:CustomerOrdersViewModel}">
<views:CustomerOrdersView />
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:OrderStatisticsViewModel}">
<views:OrderStatisticsView />
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Window.DataContext>
<vm:ApplicationViewModel />
</Window.DataContext>
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height=".07*" />
<RowDefinition Height="1*" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<TabControl Grid.Row="1"
ItemsSource="{Binding PageViewModels}"
SelectedItem="{Binding CurrentPageViewModel}"
TabStripPlacement="Top">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" />
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TabItem}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="{Binding IsEnabled}" />
</Style>
</TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
</TabControl>
</Grid>
</Window>
You could solve the problem a few ways:
Don't use ShowDialog(). Use Show(), and make the dialog window TopMost and parented to the main window.
Register the ProductView in the constructor of the DialogService (do you really need a new ProductView each time anyway?)
Make the DialogService (or a utility class inside of it) register at construction time for the message, and then pass the message on to any displayed ProductViews
Personally I like #2- since you are using ShowDialog, it implies that only one ProductView is ever needed at a time. For example:
class DialogService : IDialogService
{
Window productView = null;
ProductView _productView;
public DialogService()
{
_productView = new ProductView();
}
public void ShowDetailDialog()
{
_productView.ShowDialog();
}
}
I have a wpf application which has a main window and menu. This main window has a panel, and on clicking the menu item i create an instance of the user control and load the panel with the control.
<Window x:Class="MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="" MinHeight="750" Height="Auto" MinWidth="1100" Width="Auto" WindowState="Maximized" ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto"
Loaded ="MainWindow_OnLoaded" Closing="Window_Closing">
<ScrollViewer VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" HorizontalScrollBarVisibility ="Auto" SizeChanged="ScrollViewer_SizeChanged">
<Grid Width="Auto">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="38"></RowDefinition>
<RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<StackPanel Height="38" Width="Auto" Background="#09527B">
<Grid Margin="0,0,0,0">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition></ColumnDefinition>
<ColumnDefinition Width="70"></ColumnDefinition>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
</Grid>
</StackPanel>
<Grid Grid.Row="1">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="189"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid Grid.Column="0">
<StackPanel>
<Expander Name="test" Header="Admin" Foreground="White" Margin="0,10,0,0">
<StackPanel Margin="20,0,0,0">
<Expander Header="Data" Foreground="White">
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="Add/Edit UC1" Foreground="White" Margin="30,5,0,0" MouseDown="OpenUC1_MouseDown" MouseEnter="TextBlock_MouseEnter" MouseLeave="TextBlock_MouseLeave"/>
<TextBlock Text="Add/Edit UC2" Name="tbxBuild" Foreground="White" Margin="30,5,0,0" MouseDown="OpenUC2_MouseDown" MouseEnter="TextBlock_MouseEnter" MouseLeave="TextBlock_MouseLeave"/>
</StackPanel>
</Expander>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
<StackPanel Grid.Column="1">
<Grid Name="pnlMain" Height ="Auto" VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Left">
</Grid>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</Grid>
</ScrollViewer>
</Window>
MainWindow.cs
private void OpenUC1_MouseDown(object sender, MouseButtonEventArgs e)
{
for (int i = 0; i < pnlMain.Children.Count; i++ )
{
pnlMain.Children.Remove(pnlMain.Children[i]);
}
using (UC2 _uc2= new UC2())
{
pnlMain.Children.Add(_uc2);
}
}
private void OpenUC2_MouseDown(object sender, MouseButtonEventArgs e)
{
for (int i = 0; i < pnlMain.Children.Count; i++ )
{
pnlMain.Children.Remove(pnlMain.Children[i]);
}
using (UC1 _uc1= new UC1())
{
pnlMain.Children.Add(_uc1);
}
}
My question is when I remove the control(UC1) from the main panel, when will that control be disposed?
Both the user control(UC1 and UC2) has the same view model attached to its data context. So i find that some of the methods in the removed user control(UC1) is called even though that is removed from the panel. The reason being, when a new instance of UC2 is created, there are some changes in the data model which in effect calls the dependent methods in UC1.
But if UC1 had been disposed this wouldn't happen. How can I make sure UC1 is disposed before instance of UC2 is created?
public UC1()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = App.ViewModel.TestViewModel;
}
private void UC1_Unloaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
this.DataContext = null;
}
public UC2()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = App.ViewModel.TestViewModel;
}
private void UC2_Unloaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
this.DataContext = null;
}
The unloaded method is not called immediately when the control is removed from the panel.
When I write and test code to dynamically add and remove a UserControl object from a window's visual tree, I find that the Unloaded event is raised just as expected.
In your own code example, there is at least one serious problem, and two incongruities:
The serious problem is how you are removing children. Your for loop is iterating by index through the children of the pnlMain object (a Grid). But removing any child invalidates the sequence of indexes! That is, the loop will first remove the child at index 0; this causes the child at index 1 to now become the child at index 0. But the loop increments the index before continuing, and will next remove the child at index 1. This child was originally at index 2. The code skips every other child (i.e. the ones originally at odd-numbered indexes), leaving half of them attached as children of the Grid.
Incongruity #1: I would expect a method with the phrase "OpenUC1" in the name to add an instance of UC1. However, your OpenUC1_MouseDown() method seems to be adding an instance of UC2 (and vice a versa for OpenUC2_MouseDown()). At the very least, there should be a comment in the code explaining why the code is different from what one might expect given the name of the method.
Incongruity #2: there is a using statement around the call to Add() when adding the UserControl objects. First, UserControl itself does not implement IDisposable, so unless your types have implemented that interface, that code is not even legal. Second, even if your UserControl subclasses do implement that interface, it does not seem like a very good idea to me to dispose an object that you've just created and which you are retaining in the visual tree (i.e. by adding it to the Grid's children).
Unfortunately, as I mentioned in my comment, without a good, minimal, complete code example that reliably reproduces your problem, it is impossible to say why your code does not behave as one would hope and/or expect it to. It is possible that any of the above points (but especially #1) are the cause of the behavior you're seeing, but I have no way to know for sure.
If after addressing those issues (or determining somehow that they are not problems…though if you can legitimately do that, I would argue that the code is still defective, in the sense that it's poor design), you find that your problem still exists, please edit your question so that it includes a good, minimal, complete code example that reliably reproduces the problem.
In the meantime, here is a simple code example that illustrates the basic behavior of the Unloaded event being raised just as expected when the object is removed from the visual tree. Note that while the correct way to remove all children from the Grid object's Children collection is to simply call the Clear() method (e.g. pnlMain.Children.Clear()), I have included an example of a explicit loop-based approach that does work.
XAML:
UserControl1.xaml
<UserControl x:Class="TestSO33289488UserControlUnloaded.UserControl1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
mc:Ignorable="d"
Unloaded="UserControl_Unloaded"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
<Grid>
<TextBlock Text="UserControl" FontSize="36"/>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
MainWindow.xaml
<Window x:Class="TestSO33289488UserControlUnloaded.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<StackPanel>
<Button x:Name="button1" Content="Add UserControl"
HorizontalAlignment="Left" Click="Button_Click"/>
<Grid x:Name="grid1"/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
C#:
UserControl1.xaml.cs
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
namespace TestSO33289488UserControlUnloaded
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for UserControl1.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class UserControl1 : UserControl
{
public UserControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void UserControl_Unloaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show("UserControl.Unloaded was raised");
}
}
}
MainWindow.xaml.cs
using System.Windows;
namespace TestSO33289488UserControlUnloaded
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private bool _removeUserControl;
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (_removeUserControl)
{
//grid1.Children.Clear();
// Calling Clear() is better, but if you really want to loop,
// it is possible to do correctly. For example:
while (grid1.Children.Count > 0)
{
grid1.Children.RemoveAt(grid1.Children.Count - 1);
}
button1.Content = "Add UserControl";
}
else
{
grid1.Children.Add(new UserControl1());
button1.Content = "Remove UserControl";
}
_removeUserControl = !_removeUserControl;
}
}
}
Quote from an MSDN forum entry about Loaded/Unloaded events:
The events are raised asynchronously, so there might be some delay
between the action that causes the event and the event itself. The
events are effectively put into a list and a task is added to the
dispatcher's queue. When that task runs, it raises the events on the
list.
So the answer is you can't predict when exactly these events will raised and you shouldn't expect that they will be called immediately after you removed a control from it's parent.
It's kinda difficult to give you a proper solution without seeing the full project, but here's a quick and dirty solution: rather than making sure that the given user controls' events are fired in time let's check the Parent property of the UC1/UC2 object before running the method. If the property is null then the UC1/UC2 object was removed and you should not execute that method.
But let me point out some problems with this code:
What's the point of the using block in the MouseDown event handlers? You create a user control object, add it to the panel and then immediately after that you call the Dispose method on it? (that's what the using block does in C#)
You don't need a for loop to remove all the children elements from a Panel control like a Grid. You can do that in one line. pnlMain.Children.Clear();
I want to make a layout like the one used in any website - the header, sidebar and footer stay the same but the center part. I have multiple pages/windows to show in a wpf blend C# application and they are totally different. For example, stackoverflow has a layout for the homepage and another one for each Question. Here's another exemple:
I had to do that in a previous project and I used a single grid layout and then, for each page, I had to hide() all of them and show that each one on top -
What's the trick? How can I do the same thing in a wpf application? In a typical C# application I would have to open a child window each time but that seems ugly these days.
Thank you in advance!
If you are going to use Pages in WPF, then you will need to read the Navigation Overview page on MSDN. In short however, you can navigate between Pages in a WPF Application by using the NavigationService Class. To change the page from code behind, you could do something like this:
NextPage page = new NextPage();
NavigationService.Navigate(page);
To let the users change the Page, you can use the Hyperlink Class in your Pages:
<Hyperlink NavigateUri="pack://application:,,,/AppName;component/Pages/NextPage.xaml">
Navigate to Next Page
</Hyperlink>
To get your desired page setup, you will have to load your Pages into a Frame, which you can then layout wherever you like in MainWindow.xaml:
<Frame Source="pack://application:,,,/AppName;component/Pages/SomePage.xaml" />
Sounds like you need a custom usercontrol and some databinding.
You can declare DataTemplates in XAML as resources with the model type as key, so that WPF chooses the correct DataTemplate automatically:
Have a main ViewModel, which exposes a ImageSourceViewModel property. This property would either return a CameraSourceViewModel or a FileSourceViewModel, as appropriate.
In your page, the DataContext would be the main ViewModel, and you'd have XAML like this:
Then,
<Page x:Class="Page1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:my="clr-namespace:WpfApplication1"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300"
Title="Page1">
<Page.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type my:CameraSourceViewModel}">
<my:CameraSourceView/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type my:FileSourceViewModel}">
<my:FileSourceView/>
</DataTemplate>
</Page.Resources>
<Grid>
<ContentControl Content="{Binding ImageSourceViewModel}"/>
</Grid>
I should point out that this example uses the MVVM pattern to allow the viewmodel layer to decide on the content in the middle. Hopefully this is clear enough, if not, give me a shout and I'll try to expand it!
Let's say I have main view model where I've created a CurrentPage property that will tell which page you want to display.
/// <summary>
/// Returns the page ViewModel that the user is currently viewing.
/// </summary>
public ViewModelBase CurrentPage
{
get { return _currentPage; }
private set
{
if (value != _currentPage)
{
if (_currentPage != null)
_currentPage.IsCurrentPage = false;
_currentPage = value;
if (_currentPage != null)
_currentPage.IsCurrentPage = true;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => CurrentPage);
}
}
}
And in your xaml you can bind your page under some control. Let's say I am doing it inside a Border element.
<!-- CURRENT PAGE AREA -->
<Border Background="White" Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="0">
<HeaderedContentControl Content="{Binding Path=CurrentPage}"
Header="{Binding Path=CurrentPage.DisplayName}" />
</Border>
You can define view to your view model in resources just like this:
(partially complete XAML)
<UserControl x:Class="BAT.View.BATWizardView"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:view="clr-namespace:BAT.View"
xmlns:viewmodel="clr-namespace:BAT.ViewModel"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="350" d:DesignWidth="600">
<UserControl.Resources>
<!-- These four templates map a ViewModel to a View. -->
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type viewmodel:MyComparisonViewModel1}">
<view:MyView1 />
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type viewmodel:MyComparisonViewModel2}">
<view:MyView2 />
</DataTemplate>
</UserControl.Resources>
<Grid>
<Border Background="White" Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="0">
<HeaderedContentControl Content="{Binding Path=CurrentPage}"
Header="{Binding Path=CurrentPage.DisplayName}" />
</Border>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
See if that helps.
I have the following xaml:
<Window x:Class="Retail_Utilities.Dialogs.AdjustPriceDialog"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
ShowInTaskbar="False"
WindowStartupLocation="CenterOwner" Name="Adjust_Price"
Title="Adjust Price" Background="#ee0e1c64" AllowsTransparency="True" WindowStyle="None" Height="330" Width="570" KeyDown="Window_KeyDown" Loaded="Window_Loaded">
<Grid Height="300" Width="550">
<ListBox HorizontalAlignment="Right" Margin="0,110,35,60" Name="lstReasons" Width="120" VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
ItemsSource="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType=Window, AncestorLevel=1}, Path=reasons}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=POS_Price_Change_Reason}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
</Window>
Here is the relevant c#:
namespace Retail_Utilities.Dialogs
{
public partial class AdjustPriceDialog : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason> reasons; ...
and finally, here is the code from another page that opens this window:
AdjustPriceDialog apd = new AdjustPriceDialog();
apd.Owner = (Window)this.Parent;
apd.reasons = new ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason>();
var pcr = from pc in ctx.Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reasons where pc.Deactivated_On == null select pc;
foreach (Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason pc in pcr)
{
apd.reasons.Add(pc);
}
apd.AdjustingDetail = (Twr_POS_Invoice_Detail)lstDetails.SelectedItem;
if (apd.ShowDialog() == true)
{
}
When the dialog box opens, my lstReasons list is empty. I don't get any errors and when I place a stop in the code, I see that the reasons collection gets populated with the items from the table.
Reasons needs to be a Property (add { get; set;} ). Also, look at Visual Studio Output - it shows Binding errors, there should be some info about failed binding to reasons.
The problem seems to be How you are creating the property.
I know you put your prperty as an observable collection but this doesn't mean it is by it self observalble!
so you need to notify the UI when this property is changed by doing something in the setter like this:
public ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason> reasons
{
get{....}
set
{
Notify('reasons')
}
}
I don't remember the exact code because I didn't use WPF for a while but it is a method in INotifyPropertyChanged, good luck!
It seems your binding path is set to POS_Price_Change_Reason, while the name of your property is reasons. Unless you didn't include POS_Price_Change_Reason in your example code and reasons is the backing field for this property.
Also, keep in mind that you can only bind to public properties, not fields. Additionally, if you change the value of the property, you need to notify the view of this change, by invoking your PropertyChangedEventHandler event for that property:
PropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("YourPropertyName"));