I have a simple C#/4.0 console app that reference Log4Net 1.2.13.0 in VS2010.
In debug mode the app compiles and runs fine on my machine. However, as soon as I change to 'Release' I get the error
"Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Users\mike\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\xxxx\yyyyy\log4net.dll' or one of its dependencies. Operation is not supported."
In the AssemblyInfo.cs I have added the line:
[assembly: log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator(Watch = true)]
According to the configuration mgr, but Debug and Release are set to use platform x86. This is also happening in another C# service application on my laptop, but I thought it easier if stick with getting it working here first.
The app.config file contains a section for:
<section name="log4net" type="log4net.Config.Log4NetConfigurationSectionHandler, log4net" />
Thanks in advance
Mike
Changing the type definition in the app.config to specify the fully qualified assembly name resolved the issue for me:
<section name="log4net" type="log4net.Config.Log4NetConfigurationSectionHandler,log4net, Version=1.2.13.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=669e0ddf0bb1aa2a" />
I too had the same issue. I just checked the Unblock checkbox at the properties of log4net.dll which resolved the issue for me.
I'm currently creating a Login form and have this code:
string connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ConnectionString"].ConnectionString;
try
{
using (OdbcConnection connect = new OdbcConnection(connectionString))
{
connect.Open();
OdbcCommand cmd = new OdbcCommand("SELECT username, password FROM receptionist", connect);
OdbcDataReader reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
if (username_login.Text == username && password_login.Text == password)
{
this.Hide();
MessageBox.Show("Invalid User", "Login Error", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
this.Close();
}
else
MessageBox.Show("Invalid User", "Login Error", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
connect.Close();
}
}
catch (OdbcException ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message, "error", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
}
But whenever I try to type in the username and password there is an error called "Configuration system failed to initialize". What kind of problem is this, and how could I solve this?
Make sure that your config file (web.config if web, or app.config if windows) in your project starts as:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<configSections>
<sectionGroup name="applicationSettings"
type="System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsGroup, System, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" >
<section name="YourProjectName.Properties.Settings"
type="System.Configuration.ClientSettingsSection, System, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089"
requirePermission="false" />
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
</configuration>
Note that inside the configuration element, the first child must be the configSections element.
In the name property on section element, make sure you replace YourProjectName with your actual project's name.
It happened to me that I created a webservice in a class library project, then I copied (overwriting) the config file (in order to bring the endpoints configuration) to my windows app and I started to have the same problem. I had inadvertently removed configSections.
Delete old configuration files from c:\Users\username\AppData\Local\appname and c:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\appname and then try to restart your application.
Sometimes the Error occurs because a windows create a duplicate in the
C:\Users\App Data\Local\"You App Name"...
Just delete this folder and done. try it.
If you've added your own custom configuration sections to your App.Config, make sure you have defined the section in the <configSections> element. I added the my config XML but forgot to declare the configuration section up top - which caused the exception "Configuration system failed to initialize" for me.
After a long search I realised, this exception has an inner exception that tells you exactly what is wrong with your config file
I had this same problem with an MSTest class: Marlon Grech in his article says "the element has to be defined as the first element in the App.config."
So make sure that is the first element in under the element. I had put AppSettings first.
If you have User scoped settings you may also have a user.config file somewhere in the [Userfolder]\AppData\Local\[ProjectName] folder.
If you later remove the User scoped settings the user.config will not automatically be removed, and it's presence may cause the same error message. Deleting the folder did the trick for me.
I know this has already been answered but I had exactly the same problem in my unit tests. I was tearing my hair out - adding an appSettings section, and then declaring the configuration section as per the answer. Finally found out that I had already declared an appSettings section further up my config file. Both sections pointed to my external settings file "appSettings.config" but the first appSettings element using the attribute file whilst the other used the attribute configSource. I know the question was about the connectionStrings. Sure enough, this happens if the appSettings element is the connectionStrings element being duplicated with different attributes.
Hopefully, this can provide someone else with the solution before they go down the path I did which leads to wasting an hour or two. sigh oh the life of us developers. We waste more hours some days debugging than we spend developing!
I started to get this problem after uninstalling Oracle Client Drivers and it removed my C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\machine.config!
Copying it from another computer resolved the problem.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key="xyz" value="123" />
</appSettings>
</configuration>
Easy solution for .Net Core WinForms / WPF / .Net Standard Class Library projects
step 1: Install System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager by Nuget Manager
step 2: Add a new App.Config file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key="Bodrum" value="Yalikavak" />
</appSettings>
</configuration>
step3: Get the value
string value = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Get("Bodrum");
// value is Yalikavak
If you are calling it from a Class Library then add the App.Config file on your Main Project.
Wow it took me forever to figure out this one. For some reason changing the attribute [assembly: AssemblyCompany("CompanyName")] at AssemblyInfo.cs made this error disappear. I was referencing a project that had a different value for the attribute [assembly: AssemblyCompany("CompanyName")]. I maked sure both projects had the same attribute value and it worked great!
Same problem with me I solved my problem by removing verion="v3.5" from App.config.
Before
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5.2"/>
</startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v3.5" />//Remove this
</configuration>
Solution
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5.2"/>
</startup>
</configuration>
Here is how to use version on
MSDN Support Runtime Element
I solved the problem by using the below code
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<configSections>
<sectionGroup name="applicationSettings"
type="System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsGroup, System, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" >
<section name="YourProjectName.Properties.Settings"
type="System.Configuration.ClientSettingsSection, System, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089"
requirePermission="false" />
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
<appSettings>
<add key="SPUserName" value="TestUser" />
<add key="SPPassword" value="UserPWD" />
</appSettings>
</configuration>
It is worth noting that if you add things like connection strings into the app.config, that if you add items outside of the defined config sections, that it will not immediately complain, but when you try and access it, that you may then get the above errors.
Collapse all major sections and make sure there are no items outside the defined ones. Obvious, when you have actually spotted it.
In my case the only solution was to add the reference to the System.Configuration in my Test project as well.
This is kinda dumb, but for me I fixed it by doing a get latest from source control on my code. I think there was some new configuration element that was added by someone else, and I needed to overwrite my configuration files. OP shows the error I had gotten, which wasn't really pointing me in the right direction.
I too faced the same problem, But accidentally i written the
without writting the ,the previous one should go inside this tags. thus the 'Configuration System Failed to Initialize' error was arising.
Hope it will help
In My case, I have two configsections in the app.config file. After deleting the one hiding in the code lines, the app works fine.
So for someone has the same issue, check if you have duplicate configsections first.
If you are dealing with an Azure WebJob - I had to remove the following after upgrading to the latest 4.6.1.
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.6.1">
<assemblies>
<add assembly="System.Runtime, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
</assemblies>
</compilation>
Hope this helps.
In my case, within my .edmx file I had run the 'Update Model From Database' command. This command added an unnecessary connection string to my app.config file. I deleted that connection string and all was good again.
Try to save the .config file as utf-8 if you have some "special" characters in there. That was the issue in my case of a console application.
As #Flash Gordon mentioned in his comment, you will need to define any custom tag (as a section) in your App.config file, under <configSections>. For example, you're working on a test automation project with SpecFlow & adding <specFlow> tag, then a simplest version of App.config will look like this:
I just had this and it was because I had a <configuration> element nested inside of a <configuration> element.
I restarted Visual studio and even the whole PC.
I cleaned the project, rebuild, and deleted bin file.
Nothing helped until i changed the configuration from x64 to x86.
It worked on x86 but when i changed it back it also worked!
I tried all of the solutions above trying to figure out why one of my unit tests were failing to pick up the configuration from an app.config file that is perfect.
I had 2 references to the same assembly like so:
Removing the (duplicate) reference in yellow fixed it for me.
I hope this works for someone else, it drove me nuts for a while.
If you have a custom section, you need to mention that under configSections right below configurations tag.
Please check your transform files, make sure you remove the unnecessary tags.only the section that are going to vary needs to be there in transform files. dont mention config section in the transform files if not needed. this would also cause the problem.
if you have any syntax error in machine.config, then also this error is expected.
I was also getting
'System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException' in System.Configuration.dll
If you have windows check the slashes / I was working with a project from a guy working in linux, so he had inverted them.
I'm posting my question here and to CodeProject, as a question to the famous article series on the mysteries of config files.
From the article:
Optionally, you may specify culture, version and public key (for
signed assemblies) values if you wish to ensure only a specific
version of an assembly is searched for when your .config file is
parsed.
I'm using the following code to open and initialize the config file:
ExeConfigurationFileMap fileMap = new ExeConfigurationFileMap();
fileMap.ExeConfigFilename = path;
config = ConfigurationManager.OpenMappedExeConfiguration(fileMap, ConfigurationUserLevel.None);
section = (OptionsSection)config.GetSection("myoptionsdata");
if (section == null)
{
section = new OptionsSection(0, "aaaa", "bbbb", "cccc",14);
config.Sections.Add("myoptionsdata", section);
config.Save(ConfigurationSaveMode.Full);
}
That creates the following:
<configSections>
<section name="myoptionsdata" type="my.namespace.OptionsSection, myAssembly,
Version=1.0.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=111222aaaabbb"
allowLocation="true" allowDefinition="Everywhere"
allowExeDefinition="MachineToApplication" overrideModeDefault="Allow"
restartOnExternalChanges="true" requirePermission="true" />
</configSections>
Notice how the 'type' has Version, Culture, and the PublicKeyToken. I need to eliminate these, or at least the Version. The problem is that I deploy the app with a specific version, then I bump the version and issue updates. But when the read is done on the config it fails because the version is explicit.
So really all I want is this:
<configSections>
<section name="myoptionsdata" type="my.namespace.OptionsSection, myAssembly" />
</configSections>
I have never once seen an example that includes the extended type values. Every example shows Save() creating type="namespace.class,assembly", and yet that doesn't seem to be the default behavior.
So, with reference to the above quote, where can I find information on managing those "optional" values?
For anyone googling, this is one of the causes of the infamous error below:
Exception: An error occurred creating the configuration section
handler for myoptionsdata: Could not load file or assembly
'myAssembly, Version=1.0.3.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=111222aaaabbb' or one of its dependencies. The located
assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference.
(Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
(C:\Users\me\AppData\Roaming\product\dir\name.config line 4)
I believe my question is similar to this one which so far has not received any response.
Going "off the menu", I just want to deploy a config file to a specific location (non-default) and allow users to set options in a Tools>Options sort of form. Most apps do this. Is there any easy and commonly accepted way of doing this? I should note that my app is an Outlook Addin, and I do my config file like this because I want to store addin settings in an addin-specific config file rather than anywhere near Outlook configs.
The assembly that contains your custom configuration section has a strong name. Strong-naming an assembly explicitly prevents the kind of in-place version upgrade you want to do. Remove the strong name from that assembly and the assembly loader will stop caring what version it is.