We Keep Coding

Specific Use Case For Background Updating Progress Bar

I have been searching for over two days for a solution to this issue, and have finally decided to ask this question. I have found MANY relevant topics, but none of them seem to solve my problem. Most recently, I tried all of the solutions listed here.
Background Info: I have a class that handles traversing a massive amount of data. The class is called Traverse. There is a class method called DoFullTraverse (Traverse.DoFullTraverse), that runs a complete traverse than can (depending on user input) take up to 30 seconds. I am working in WPF, MVVM pattern. I would like to update a status bar on the gui for the progress of the DoFullTraverse. I calculate at the beginning of the function the exact number of loops required for calculation, and then increment a loop counter. Each time it reaches another 1/100, I increment the progress bar by 1. My progress bar (in xaml) has its value bound to a property in my VM called PBarV.
Most Recent Attempt: I have tried 100 different solutions but my most recent attempt looks like this:
private void runTraverseAndUpdateBar()
{
var worker = new BackgroundWorker();
worker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(worker_DoWork);
worker.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(worker_Complete);
worker.RunWorkerAsync();
while (!ThreadCheck)
{
Thread.Sleep(500);
}
}
void worker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
var worker = sender as BackgroundWorker;
for (int i = 0; i < 36; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(500);
PBarV += 3;
}
e.Result = true;
}
void worker_Complete(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
ThreadCheck = true;
}
I believe that I am fundamentally misunderstanding how the background worker does work.
The Main Problem: I can get this method to work just fine, if I throw the function into the background worker and continue as usual. The problem is, I need the data from that function before my program to continue. Therefore, I need it to execute linearly but still update the status bar properly.
If anyone can shed some light on what I am missing or even nudge me in the right direction, I would appreciate it greatly.
Edit: This is not duplicate. The post you provided does not cover the issue of linear executing and waiting for the background worker to complete before continuing.
Edit 2: (As Per #Clemens Request)
I need the background worker to complete work before the main program continues. I am running the computationally heavy process in the background worker specifically so that the progress bar can be updated. But, BEFORE the main program can continue, I need the information from Traverse.DoFullTraverse();
To be VERY specific. The main program should halt all execution (other than updating status bar) until the background worker has completed Traverse.DoFullTraverse();

Here's a trivial example you can play around with and apply to your view model. It's important to use prototypes to create code and learn how it works in order to apply it to a larger and more complex application.
Please note that the example doesn't include trivial stuff like how to implement INotifyPropertyChanged and ICommand--those are easy to do.
Also, note the comments within TraverseYo. Specifically, the ones that tell you what thread you're currently on. Understanding the flow of execution across threads is important to get this working correctly. If you don't know what thread you're on, simply get the ApartmentState of the current thread. If it's STA, you're most likely on the UI thread.
public class LongLastingWorkViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public bool Busy
{
// INotifyPropertyChanged property implementation omitted
}
public double PercentComplete
{
// INotifyPropertyChanged property implementation omitted
}
public ICommand PerformWork { get; set; }
public LongLastingWorkViewModel()
{
// delegated ICommand implementation omitted--there's TONS of it out there
PerformWork = new DelegatedCommand(TraverseYo);
}
private void TraverseYo()
{
// we are on the UI thread here
Busy = true;
PercentComplete = 0;
Task.Run(() => {
// we are on a background thread here
// this is an example of long lasting work
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(10 * 1000); // each step takes 10 seconds
// even though we are on a background thread, bindings
// automatically marshal property updates to the UI thread
// this is NOT TRUE for INotifyCollectionChanged updates!
PercentDone += .1;
}
Busy = false;
});
}
You can bind Busy to an overlay that blocks all UI while execution runs, bind PercentComplete to a progress bar, and PerformWork to a button.

C# Trouble Using Safe Thead or Background Worker

Fairly frustrating since this seems to be well documented and the fact that I accomplished this before, but can't duplicate the same success. Sorry, I'll try to relate it all clearly.
Visual Studio, C# Form, One Main Form has text fields, among other widgets.
At one point we have the concept that we are "running" and therefore gathering data.
For the moment, I started a one second timer so that I can update simulated data into some fields. Eventually that one second timer will take the more rapid data and update it only once per second to the screen, that's the request for the application right now we update at the rate we receive which is a little over 70 Hz, they don't want it that way. In addition some other statistics will be computed and those should be the field updates. Therefore being simple I'm trying to just generate random data and update those fields at the 1 Hz rate. And then expand from that point.
Definition and management of the timer: (this is all within the same class MainScreen)
System.Timers.Timer oneSecondTimer;
public UInt32 run_time = 0;
public int motion = 5;
private void InitializeTimers()
{
this.oneSecondTimer = new System.Timers.Timer(1000);
this.oneSecondTimer.Elapsed += new System.Timers.ElapsedEventHandler(oneSecondTimer_elapsed);
}
public void start_one_second_timer()
{
run_time = 0;
oneSecondTimer.Enabled = true;
}
public void stop_one_second_timer()
{
oneSecondTimer.Enabled = false;
run_time = 0;
}
Random mot = new Random();
private void oneSecondTimer_elapsed(object source, System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
run_time++;
motion = mot.Next(1, 10);
this.oneSecondThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(this.UpdateTextFields));
this.oneSecondThread.Start();
}
private void UpdateTextFields()
{
this.motionDisplay.Text = this.motion.ToString();
}
motionDisplay is just a textbox in my main form. I get the Invalid Operation Exception pointing me towards the help on how to make Thread-Safe calls. I also tried backgroundworker and end up with the same result. The details are that motionDisplay is accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created on.
So looking for some suggestions as to where my mistakes are.
Best Regards. I continue to iterate on this and will update if I find a solution.

Use a System.Forms.Timer rather than a System.Timers.Timer. It will fire it's elapsed event in the UI thread.
Don't create a new thread to update the UI; just do the update in the elapsed event handler.

Try this
private void UpdateTextFields()
{
this.BeginInvoke(new EventHandler((s,e)=>{
this.motionDisplay.Text = this.motion.ToString();
}));
}
This will properly marshall a call back to the main thread.
The thing with WinForm development is that all the controls are not thread safe. Even getting a property such as .Text from another thread can cause these type of errors to happen. To make it even more frustrating is that sometimes it will work at runtime and you won't get an exception, other times you will.

This is how I do it:
private delegate void UpdateMotionDisplayCallback(string text);
private void UpdateMotionDisplay(string text) {
// InvokeRequired required compares the thread ID of the
// calling thread to the thread ID of the creating thread.
// If these threads are different, it returns true.
if (this.motionDisplay.InvokeRequired) {
UpdateMotionDisplayCallback d = new UpdateMotionDisplayCallback(UpdateMotionDisplay);
this.Invoke(d, new object[] { text });
} else {
this.motionDisplay.Text = text;
}
}
When you want to update the text in motionDisplay just call:
UpdateMotionDisplay(this.motion.ToString())

Update MainWindow on Timer.Elapsed event

I am writing a home WPF app that is obtaining a file from a server at a configured interval.
It's a basic window, with a couple of labels. I have the following
Start Time (reflects DateTime the "Start" event was hit
Duration (reflects the time the app has been running)
Speed (the download speed of the file)
I want to update the Duration on the Main window each second so I have the following code to do this (in a seperate class "RunDownloader.cs").
private void StartTickTimer()
{
const double interval = 1000;
if (_tickTimer == null)
{
_tickTimer = new Timer
{
Interval = interval
};
_tickTimer.Elapsed += _ticktimer_Elapsed;
}
_tickTimer.Start();
}
On _ticktimer_Elapsed I call a method in the main window _mainWindow.UpdateTicker();
This does the following.
public void UpdateTicker()
{
var timeStarted = lblTimeStarted.Content.ToString();
DateTime startTime = DateTime.Parse(timeStarted);
TimeSpan span = DateTime.Now.Subtract(startTime);
//ToDo: Output time taken here!
//lblTimeElapsed.Content =
}
I have two issues.
I have the following exception when calling lblTimeStarted.Content.ToString(); in UpdateTicker()
"The calling thread cannot access this object because a different thread owns it."
I dont quite know, how to show the duration correctly for lblTimeElapsed.Content from TimeSpan
Thanks in advance for any answers. :D

In WPF you cannot update UI objects (that get created on the UI thread) from threads other than the UI thread.
In order to update UI controls from some other thread (eg a timer thread) you need to use the Dispatcher to run your update code on the UI thread.
This Question/answer may help you or you will find plenty of info by googling "WPF Dispatcher".
An example dispatcher call - the lamda code will get posted off to run on the UI thread:
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new Action(() =>
{
text_box.AppendText(formated_msg);
text_box.ScrollToEnd();
}));
Alternatively you could replace your existing timer with a DispatchTimer - unlike the timer you are using it ensures that the timer callback is on the UI thread:
Reasons for using a DispatcherTimer opposed to a System.Timers.Timer are that the DispatcherTimer runs on the same thread as the Dispatcher and a DispatcherPriority can be set on the DispatcherTimer.

Your timer is running on its own thread and invoking the UpdateTicker() method from there. However, most UI frameworks, including WPF, prohibit accessing UI controls from threads other than the one which the respective control was created on (the latter is usually denoted as the "UI thread"). You have two main options here:
Use a DispatcherTimer. This will run on your UI thread and avoids any threading issues, but then, since your UpdateTicker() code also runs on this thread, your UI will be unresponsive while you are doing processing. This may or may not be an issue; if all you do is a couple of field/property changes, this is fine.
In your timer callback, use this.Dispatcher.Invoke() or this.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke() to call your UI update method once other processing is completed (example: this.Dispatcher.Invoke((Action) UpdateTicker)). This will "bump" the call to the proper thread for the UI update, while maintaining the asynchrony for data processing. In other words, this is a more effective approach.
The TimeSpan struct has a ToString() method that accepts formatting; or, if this is inconvenient, it has several helper properties (Days, Hours, Minutes, TotalDays, TotalHours, TotalMinutes etc.) that you can use for display purposes.

You can do it like:
In main windows:
public void ChangeTime(string time)
{
lblsb.Content = time;
}
And in RunDownloader:
class RunDownloader
{
Timer _tickTimer;
MainWindow window;
public RunDownloader(MainWindow window)
{
this.window = window;
}
private delegate void MyDel(string str);
public void StartTickTimer()
{
const double interval = 1000;
if (_tickTimer == null)
{
_tickTimer = new Timer
{
Interval = interval
};
_tickTimer.Elapsed += (object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) =>
{
window.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new MyDel(window.ChangeTime), DateTime.Now.ToLongDateString());
};
}
_tickTimer.Start();
}
}

How to update UI from another thread running in another class

I am currently writing my first program on C# and I am extremely new to the language (used to only work with C so far). I have done a lot of research, but all answers were too general and I simply couldn't get it t work.
So here my (very common) problem:
I have a WPF application which takes inputs from a few textboxes filled by the user and then uses that to do a lot of calculations with them. They should take around 2-3 minutes, so I would like to update a progress bar and a textblock telling me what the current status is.
Also I need to store the UI inputs from the user and give them to the thread, so I have a third class, which I use to create an object and would like to pass this object to the background thread.
Obviously I would run the calculations in another thread, so the UI doesn't freeze, but I don't know how to update the UI, since all the calculation methods are part of another class.
After a lot of reasearch I think the best method to go with would be using dispatchers and TPL and not a backgroundworker, but honestly I am not sure how they work and after around 20 hours of trial and error with other answers, I decided to ask a question myself.
Here a very simple structure of my program:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
Initialize Component();
}
private void startCalc(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
inputValues input = new inputValues();
calcClass calculations = new calcClass();
try
{
input.pota = Convert.ToDouble(aVar.Text);
input.potb = Convert.ToDouble(bVar.Text);
input.potc = Convert.ToDouble(cVar.Text);
input.potd = Convert.ToDouble(dVar.Text);
input.potf = Convert.ToDouble(fVar.Text);
input.potA = Convert.ToDouble(AVar.Text);
input.potB = Convert.ToDouble(BVar.Text);
input.initStart = Convert.ToDouble(initStart.Text);
input.initEnd = Convert.ToDouble(initEnd.Text);
input.inita = Convert.ToDouble(inita.Text);
input.initb = Convert.ToDouble(initb.Text);
input.initc = Convert.ToDouble(initb.Text);
}
catch
{
MessageBox.Show("Some input values are not of the expected Type.", "Wrong Input", MessageBoxButton.OK, MessageBoxImage.Error);
}
Thread calcthread = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(calculations.testMethod);
calcthread.Start(input);
}
public class inputValues
{
public double pota, potb, potc, potd, potf, potA, potB;
public double initStart, initEnd, inita, initb, initc;
}
public class calcClass
{
public void testmethod(inputValues input)
{
Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Lowest;
int i;
//the input object will be used somehow, but that doesn't matter for my problem
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(10);
}
}
}
I would be very grateful if someone had a simple explanation how to update the UI from inside the testmethod. Since I am new to C# and object oriented programming, too complicated answers I will very likely not understand, I'll do my best though.
Also if someone has a better idea in general (maybe using backgroundworker or anything else) I am open to see it.

First you need to use Dispatcher.Invoke to change the UI from another thread and to do that from another class, you can use events.
Then you can register to that event(s) in the main class and Dispatch the changes to the UI and in the calculation class you throw the event when you want to notify the UI:
class MainWindow : Window
{
private void startCalc()
{
//your code
CalcClass calc = new CalcClass();
calc.ProgressUpdate += (s, e) => {
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate() { /* update UI */ });
};
Thread calcthread = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(calc.testMethod));
calcthread.Start(input);
}
}
class CalcClass
{
public event EventHandler ProgressUpdate;
public void testMethod(object input)
{
//part 1
if(ProgressUpdate != null)
ProgressUpdate(this, new YourEventArgs(status));
//part 2
}
}
UPDATE:
As it seems this is still an often visited question and answer I want to update this answer with how I would do it now (with .NET 4.5) - this is a little longer as I will show some different possibilities:
class MainWindow : Window
{
Task calcTask = null;
void buttonStartCalc_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e) { StartCalc(); } // #1
async void buttonDoCalc_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e) // #2
{
await CalcAsync(); // #2
}
void StartCalc()
{
var calc = PrepareCalc();
calcTask = Task.Run(() => calc.TestMethod(input)); // #3
}
Task CalcAsync()
{
var calc = PrepareCalc();
return Task.Run(() => calc.TestMethod(input)); // #4
}
CalcClass PrepareCalc()
{
//your code
var calc = new CalcClass();
calc.ProgressUpdate += (s, e) => Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
// update UI
});
return calc;
}
}
class CalcClass
{
public event EventHandler<EventArgs<YourStatus>> ProgressUpdate; // #5
public TestMethod(InputValues input)
{
//part 1
ProgressUpdate.Raise(this, status); // #6 - status is of type YourStatus
// alternative version to the extension for C# 6+:
ProgressUpdate?.Invoke(this, new EventArgs<YourStatus>(status));
//part 2
}
}
static class EventExtensions
{
public static void Raise<T>(this EventHandler<EventArgs<T>> theEvent,
object sender, T args)
{
if (theEvent != null)
theEvent(sender, new EventArgs<T>(args));
}
}
#1) How to start the "synchronous" calculations and run them in the background
#2) How to start it "asynchronous" and "await it": Here the calculation is executed and completed before the method returns, but because of the async/await the UI is not blocked (BTW: such event handlers are the only valid usages of async void as the event handler must return void - use async Task in all other cases)
#3) Instead of a new Thread we now use a Task. To later be able to check its (successfull) completion we save it in the global calcTask member. In the background this also starts a new thread and runs the action there, but it is much easier to handle and has some other benefits.
#4) Here we also start the action, but this time we return the task, so the "async event handler" can "await it". We could also create async Task CalcAsync() and then await Task.Run(() => calc.TestMethod(input)).ConfigureAwait(false); (FYI: the ConfigureAwait(false) is to avoid deadlocks, you should read up on this if you use async/await as it would be to much to explain here) which would result in the same workflow, but as the Task.Run is the only "awaitable operation" and is the last one we can simply return the task and save one context switch, which saves some execution time.
#5) Here I now use a "strongly typed generic event" so we can pass and receive our "status object" easily
#6) Here I use the extension defined below, which (aside from ease of use) solve the possible race condition in the old example. There it could have happened that the event got null after the if-check, but before the call if the event handler was removed in another thread at just that moment. This can't happen here, as the extensions gets a "copy" of the event delegate and in the same situation the handler is still registered inside the Raise method.

I am going to throw you a curve ball here. If I have said it once I have said it a hundred times. Marshaling operations like Invoke or BeginInvoke are not always the best methods for updating the UI with worker thread progress.
In this case it usually works better to have the worker thread publish its progress information to a shared data structure that the UI thread then polls at regular intervals. This has several advantages.
It breaks the tight coupling between the UI and worker thread that Invoke imposes.
The UI thread gets to dictate when the UI controls get updated...the way it should be anyway when you really think about it.
There is no risk of overrunning the UI message queue as would be the case if BeginInvoke were used from the worker thread.
The worker thread does not have to wait for a response from the UI thread as would be the case with Invoke.
You get more throughput on both the UI and worker threads.
Invoke and BeginInvoke are expensive operations.
So in your calcClass create a data structure that will hold the progress information.
public class calcClass
{
private double percentComplete = 0;
public double PercentComplete
{
get
{
// Do a thread-safe read here.
return Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref percentComplete, 0, 0);
}
}
public testMethod(object input)
{
int count = 1000;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(10);
double newvalue = ((double)i + 1) / (double)count;
Interlocked.Exchange(ref percentComplete, newvalue);
}
}
}
Then in your MainWindow class use a DispatcherTimer to periodically poll the progress information. Configure the DispatcherTimer to raise the Tick event on whatever interval is most appropriate for your situation.
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public void YourDispatcherTimer_Tick(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
YourProgressBar.Value = calculation.PercentComplete;
}
}

You're right that you should use the Dispatcher to update controls on the UI thread, and also right that long-running processes should not run on the UI thread. Even if you run the long-running process asynchronously on the UI thread, it can still cause performance issues.
It should be noted that Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher will return the dispatcher for the current thread, not necessarily the UI thread. I think you can use Application.Current.Dispatcher to get a reference to the UI thread's dispatcher if that's available to you, but if not you'll have to pass the UI dispatcher in to your background thread.
Typically I use the Task Parallel Library for threading operations instead of a BackgroundWorker. I just find it easier to use.
For example,
Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
SomeObject.RunLongProcess(someDataObject));
where
void RunLongProcess(SomeViewModel someDataObject)
{
for (int i = 0; i <= 1000; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(10);
// Update every 10 executions
if (i % 10 == 0)
{
// Send message to UI thread
Application.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(
DispatcherPriority.Normal,
(Action)(() => someDataObject.ProgressValue = (i / 1000)));
}
}
}

Everything that interacts with the UI must be called in the UI thread (unless it is a frozen object). To do that, you can use the dispatcher.
var disp = /* Get the UI dispatcher, each WPF object has a dispatcher which you can query*/
disp.BeginInvoke(DispatcherPriority.Normal,
(Action)(() => /*Do your UI Stuff here*/));
I use BeginInvoke here, usually a backgroundworker doesn't need to wait that the UI updates. If you want to wait, you can use Invoke. But you should be careful not to call BeginInvoke to fast to often, this can get really nasty.
By the way, The BackgroundWorker class helps with this kind of taks. It allows Reporting changes, like a percentage and dispatches this automatically from the Background thread into the ui thread. For the most thread <> update ui tasks the BackgroundWorker is a great tool.

If this is a long calculation then I would go background worker. It has progress support. It also has support for cancel.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc221403(v=VS.95).aspx
Here I have a TextBox bound to contents.
private void backgroundWorker_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Debug.Write("backgroundWorker_RunWorkerCompleted");
if (e.Cancelled)
{
contents = "Cancelled get contents.";
NotifyPropertyChanged("Contents");
}
else if (e.Error != null)
{
contents = "An Error Occured in get contents";
NotifyPropertyChanged("Contents");
}
else
{
contents = (string)e.Result;
if (contentTabSelectd) NotifyPropertyChanged("Contents");
}
}

You are going to have to come back to your main thread (also called UI thread) in order to update the UI.
Any other thread trying to update your UI will just cause exceptions to be thrown all over the place.
So because you are in WPF, you can use the Dispatcher and more specifically a beginInvoke on this dispatcher. This will allow you to execute what needs done (typically Update the UI) in the UI thread.
You migh also want to "register" the UI in your business, by maintaining a reference to a control/form, so you can use its dispatcher.

Thank God, Microsoft got that figured out in WPF :)
Every Control, like a progress bar, button, form, etc. has a Dispatcher on it. You can give the Dispatcher an Action that needs to be performed, and it will automatically call it on the correct thread (an Action is like a function delegate).
You can find an example here.
Of course, you'll have to have the control accessible from other classes, e.g. by making it public and handing a reference to the Window to your other class, or maybe by passing a reference only to the progress bar.

Felt the need to add this better answer, as nothing except BackgroundWorker seemed to help me, and the answer dealing with that thus far was woefully incomplete. This is how you would update a XAML page called MainWindow that has an Image tag like this:
<Image Name="imgNtwkInd" Source="Images/network_on.jpg" Width="50" />
with a BackgroundWorker process to show if you are connected to the network or not:
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
private BackgroundWorker bw = new BackgroundWorker();
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Set up background worker to allow progress reporting and cancellation
bw.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
bw.WorkerSupportsCancellation = true;
// This is your main work process that records progress
bw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(SomeClass.DoWork);
// This will update your page based on that progress
bw.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(bw_ProgressChanged);
// This starts your background worker and "DoWork()"
bw.RunWorkerAsync();
// When this page closes, this will run and cancel your background worker
this.Closing += new CancelEventHandler(Page_Unload);
}
private void bw_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
BitmapImage bImg = new BitmapImage();
bool connected = false;
string response = e.ProgressPercentage.ToString(); // will either be 1 or 0 for true/false -- this is the result recorded in DoWork()
if (response == "1")
connected = true;
// Do something with the result we got
if (!connected)
{
bImg.BeginInit();
bImg.UriSource = new Uri("Images/network_off.jpg", UriKind.Relative);
bImg.EndInit();
imgNtwkInd.Source = bImg;
}
else
{
bImg.BeginInit();
bImg.UriSource = new Uri("Images/network_on.jpg", UriKind.Relative);
bImg.EndInit();
imgNtwkInd.Source = bImg;
}
}
private void Page_Unload(object sender, CancelEventArgs e)
{
bw.CancelAsync(); // stops the background worker when unloading the page
}
}
public class SomeClass
{
public static bool connected = false;
public void DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
BackgroundWorker bw = sender as BackgroundWorker;
int i = 0;
do
{
connected = CheckConn(); // do some task and get the result
if (bw.CancellationPending == true)
{
e.Cancel = true;
break;
}
else
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
// Record your result here
if (connected)
bw.ReportProgress(1);
else
bw.ReportProgress(0);
}
}
while (i == 0);
}
private static bool CheckConn()
{
bool conn = false;
Ping png = new Ping();
string host = "SomeComputerNameHere";
try
{
PingReply pngReply = png.Send(host);
if (pngReply.Status == IPStatus.Success)
conn = true;
}
catch (PingException ex)
{
// write exception to log
}
return conn;
}
}
For more information: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc221403(v=VS.95).aspx

Threads and waiting

I have a thread that gathers a list of URLs from a website and updates the UI as it's doing so. That works fine. But, I need the Main thread to wait until the links have been gathered. I tried to do a join, but this locks up the UI. Here is my example. As you can see at the moment the foreach loop gets called at the same time as the thread is running. I want the foreach to run after the thread has ran.
Any ideas?
/** This thread will add links to list<string> linkList **/
Thread linkListThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(getLinkList));
linkListThread.Start();
foreach (String link in linkList)
{
txtOutput.Text += link;
}

You can use a background worker. Or have the thread method call a method in main context when it is done, passing the list of items you gathered.
EDIT
I thought I should elaborate my second approach a little.
You could prepare a list instance before creating the thread:
List<string> links = new List<string>();
Then you pass this list to the thread, which fills it:
Thread t = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(FillList));
t.Start(links);
The thread method takes the list, fills it and calls a method that shows the details in the UI:
private static void FillList(object state)
{
List<string> links = (List<string>)state;
// Fill data
this.Invoke((MethodInvoker)delegate() { HandleNewLinks(links); }));
}
The HandleNewLinks method works as one would expect:
private void HandleNewLinks(List<string> links)
{
foreach (string link in links)
// Do something...
}

Move the code that needs to run after the thread has completed into an event handler for BackgroundWorker.RunWorkerCompleted
Update: The handler is invoked on the right (calling ) thread - so you can safely update the UI.
See the code snippet on the above msdn page.

It is not clear what you want: either the application waits (and is unresponsive), or the application does not wait and remains responsive. In the latter case, you might want to disable some controls / possible actions until the list has finished loading.
A dirty workaround is to do some sort of spin waiting (Join with a timeout of a few ms, returns the result whether it is done or not) with some Application.DoEvents() calls.

Something simple would be to have your worker threads call back to the main application on completion, you then keep a count of completed threads and in your main UI do something like:
while(runningThreads != 0)
{
Application.DoEvents();
}
and have the threads call:
void OnThreadCompleted()
{
runningThreads--;
}
Better to use BackgroundWorker for this instead of creating your own threads as this has all the callback mechanisms ready to go.

We have used the Background worker for something similar and it worked well, with two observations:
Don't append text to a textbox with += because it will slow you down considerably after a few hundred lines. Use AppendText instead.
If you add a lot of info to the interface and have sleep times (during processing), the thread might 'fall asleep'. We fixed it by deleting the text in the textbox every 200 lines (the results were written to a file, so we didn't lose anything).

One alternative is simply use Invoke on the main thread:
void YourMethod()
{
Thread linkListThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(getLinkList));
linkListThread.Start();
}
void getLinkList()
{
List<string> linkList = new List<string>();
// Your tasks
// Done
LinkListComplete(linkList);
}
void LinkListComplete(List<string> linkList)
{
if (InvokeRequired)
{
Invoke(new Action<List<string>>(LinkListComplete),linkList);
return;
}
foreach (String link in linkList)
{
txtOutput.Text += link;
}
}