Related
I just discovered this nice tool XmlUnit that allows me to evaluate 2 different XML documents and display the eventual discrepencies.
string control = "<a><b attr=\"abc\"></b></a>";
string test = "<a><b attr=\"xyz\"></b></a>";
var myDiff = DiffBuilder.Compare(Input.FromString(control))
.WithTest(Input.FromString(test))
.Build();
Assert.IsFalse(myDiff.HasDifferences(), myDiff.ToString());
However, I have found that the myDiff.ToString() only displays the first difference encountered.
Is there a way to display them all ?
I just found the solution
Assert.IsFalse(myDiff.HasDifferences(), string.Join(Environment.NewLine, myDiff.Differences));
I assume that you are using the xmlunit.net library (You didn't say the name of the tool that you found but your example seems to match).
You can search their GitHub repo and find the DiffBuilder class file. If you look at the Build method you will see it returns a Diff object. If you go to the Diff class file you will find that it's ToString method looks like this.
public override string ToString() {
return ToString(formatter);
}
Which doesn't tell you a lot but if you go to the other ToString overload you find this.
public string ToString(IComparisonFormatter formatter) {
if (!HasDifferences()) {
return "[identical]";
}
return differences.First().Comparison.ToString(formatter);
}
Now we are getting somewhere. We now know that Diff stores its list of differences in a private differences field and why ToString() only returns one difference (The .First() call). If you look through that class you will find that there's a public property called Differences which exposes that field as an IEnumerable. So the way to get all differences is to loop through that property and collect all of them like so.
string control = "<a><b attr=\"abc\" attr2=\"123\"></b></a>";
string test = "<a><b attr=\"xyz\" attr2=\"987\"></b></a>";
var myDiff = DiffBuilder.Compare(Input.FromString(control))
.WithTest(Input.FromString(test))
.Build();
var sb = new StringBuilder();
foreach(var dif in myDiff.Differences)
{
sb.AppendLine(dif.Comparison.ToString());
}
Assert.IsFalse(myDiff.HasDifferences(), sb.ToString());
Note that I got the syntax for formatting the difference from the Diff class's ToString code. Also notice that I added a second attribute to your examples to demonstrate that this really is showing all the differences.
I'm trying to compare a string but the document no in my string is always different and I don't want my unit test to fail. I really just want to check if the document posted.
In my example, it is the document no that may not match.
Assert.AreEqual("1 Document(s) Posted. Document QA00752 has been created.",
message, "Post Confirmation Message does not match expected");
Any suggestions? I could find out what the document no is supposed to be by checking the data in the database and write it out to a variable but I don't know how to put it in my statement above.
string doc = "some code goes here"
Perhaps
Assert.AreEqual("1 Document(s) Posted. Document " + doc + " has been created.",
message, "Post Confirmation Message does not match expected");
I think that trying to parse a message to remove specific identifiers is problematic. If this is just a one-time thing, and you won't be checking various strings as a habit in your testing, then a simple .Contains or a regex could work.
But, if you're doing this task all over the place, then perhaps some abstraction is in order. Have you considered making your log messages into an object instead of a simple string?
public sealed class Notification {
public string Message { get; set; }
public string Identifier { get; set; }
public int? Count { get; set; }
}
Then when you're working with these notifications such as in a unit test, you can compare the Message property to see it's identical, but ignore the Identifier and Count.
Here's another way you could do it:
public sealed class InterpolatedString {
public InterpolatedString(string stringWithPlaceholders, params string[] values) {
StringWithPlaceholders = stringWithPlaceholders;
Values = values;
}
public string StringWithPlaceholders { get; }
public string[] Values { get; }
public override string ToString() => string.Format(StringWithPlaceholders, Values);
}
You'd create that like this:
return new InterpolatedString(
"{0} Document(s) Posted. Document {1} has been created.",
$"{count:#,##0}",
documentCode
);
Then when testing or grouping, you have access to the non-interpolated string.
var actual = DoTest();
Assert.AreEqual(
"{0} Document(s) Posted. Document {1} has been created.",
actual.StringWithPlaceholders
);
And finally, any time you want the actual string, you can just do ToString() or let it get implicitly run when a compiler-supported implicit conversion to string occurs.
There is the problem of having to repeat a string and the risk of breaking a unit test if you change the string in the code. However, if you put your strings into a resource file, then you don't even need to repeat them in two places—you can just use the resource file to spit them out. Another option is to keep strings in public static members instead of embedded deep in the code.
If you need pattern matching, then a regular expression (as mentioned by SLaks) is the cleanest way to go:
Assert.IsTrue(
Regex.IsMatch(message, #"1 Document\(s\) Posted. Document QA\d+ has been created."),
"Post Confirmation Message does not match expected");
Just assert that the message Contains("has been created"), unless there are conditions where that won't pass.
C#6.0 have a string interpolation - a nice feature to format strings like:
var name = "John";
WriteLine($"My name is {name}");
The example is converted to
var name = "John";
WriteLine(String.Format("My name is {0}", name));
From the localization point of view, it is much better to store strings like :
"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}"
than in String.Format notation:
"My name is {0} {1} {2}"
How to use the string interpolation for .NET localization? Is there going to be a way to put $"..." to resource files? Or should strings be stored like "...{name}" and somehow interpolated on fly?
P.S. This question is NOT about "how to make string.FormatIt extension" (there are A LOT of such libraries, SO answers, etc.). This question is about something like Roslyn extension for "string interpolation" in "localization" context (both are terms in MS .NET vocabulary), or dynamic usage like Dylan proposed.
An interpolated string evaluates the block between the curly braces as a C# expression (e.g. {expression}, {1 + 1}, {person.FirstName}).
This means that the expressions in an interpolated string must reference names in the current context.
For example this statement will not compile:
var nameFormat = $"My name is {name}"; // Cannot use *name*
// before it is declared
var name = "Fred";
WriteLine(nameFormat);
Similarly:
class Program
{
const string interpolated = $"{firstName}"; // Name *firstName* does not exist
// in the current context
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var firstName = "fred";
Console.WriteLine(interpolated);
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
To answer your question:
There is no current mechanism provided by the framework to evaluate interpolated strings at runtime. Therefore, you cannot store strings and interpolate on the fly out of the box.
There are libraries that exist that handle runtime interpolation of strings.
According to this discussion on the Roslyn codeplex site, string interpolation will likely not be compatible with resource files (emphasis mine):
String interpolation could be neater and easier to debug than either String.Format or concatenation...
Dim y = $"Robot {name} reporting
{coolant.name} levels are {coolant.level}
{reactor.name} levels are {reactor.level}"
However, this example is fishy. Most professional programmers won't be writing
user-facing strings in code. Instead they'll be storing those strings in resources (.resw, .resx or .xlf) for reasons of localization. So there doesn't seem much use for string interpolation here.
Assuming that your question is more about how to localise interpolated strings in your source code, and not how to handle interpolated string resources...
Given the example code:
var name = "John";
var middlename = "W";
var surname = "Bloggs";
var text = $"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}";
Console.WriteLine(text);
The output is obviously:
My name is John W Bloggs
Now change the text assignment to fetch a translation instead:
var text = Translate($"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}");
Translate is implemented like this:
public static string Translate(FormattableString text)
{
return string.Format(GetTranslation(text.Format),
text.GetArguments());
}
private static string GetTranslation(string text)
{
return text; // actually use gettext or whatever
}
You need to provide your own implementation of GetTranslation; it will receive a string like "My name is {0} {1} {2}" and should use GetText or resources or similar to locate and return a suitable translation for this, or just return the original parameter to skip translation.
You will still need to document for your translators what the parameter numbers mean; the text used in the original code string doesn't exist at runtime.
If, for example, in this case GetTranslation returned "{2}. {0} {2}, {1}. Don't wear it out." (hey, localisation is not just about language!) then the output of the full program would be:
Bloggs. John Bloggs, W. Don't wear it out.
Having said this, while using this style of translation is easy to develop, it's hard to actually translate, since the strings are buried in the code and only surface at runtime. Unless you have a tool that can statically explore your code and extract all the translatable strings (without having to hit that code path at runtime), you're better off using more traditional resx files, since they inherently give you a table of text to be translated.
As already said in previous answers: you currently cannot load the format string at runtime (e.g. from resource files) for string interpolation because it is used at compile time.
If you don't care about the compile time feature and just want to have named placeholders, you could use something like this extension method:
public static string StringFormat(this string input, Dictionary<string, object> elements)
{
int i = 0;
var values = new object[elements.Count];
foreach (var elem in elements)
{
input = Regex.Replace(input, "{" + Regex.Escape(elem.Key) + "(?<format>[^}]+)?}", "{" + i + "${format}}");
values[i++] = elem.Value;
}
return string.Format(input, values);
}
Be aware that you cannot have inline expressions like {i+1} here and that this is not code with best performance.
You can use this with a dictionary you load from resource files or inline like this:
var txt = "Hello {name} on {day:yyyy-MM-dd}!".StringFormat(new Dictionary<string, object>
{
["name"] = "Joe",
["day"] = DateTime.Now,
});
String interpolation is difficult to combine with localization because the compiler prefers to translate it to string.Format(...), which does not support localization. However, there is a trick that makes it possible to combine localization and string interpolation; it is described near the end of this article.
Normally string interpolation is translated to string.Format, whose behavior cannot be customized. However, in much the same way as lambda methods sometimes become expression trees, the compiler will switch from string.Format to FormattableStringFactory.Create (a .NET 4.6 method) if the target method accepts a System.FormattableString object.
The problem is, the compiler prefers to call string.Format if possible, so if there were an overload of Localized() that accepted FormattableString, it would not work with string interpolation because the C# compiler would simply ignore it [because there is an overload that accepts a plain string]. Actually, it's worse than that: the compiler also refuses to use FormattableString when calling an extension method.
It can work if you use a non-extension method. For example:
static class Loca
{
public static string lize(this FormattableString message)
{ return message.Format.Localized(message.GetArguments()); }
}
Then you can use it like this:
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Localize.UseResourceManager(Resources.ResourceManager);
var name = "Dave";
Console.WriteLine(Loca.lize($"Hello, {name}"));
}
}
It's important to realize that the compiler converts the $"..." string into an old-fashioned format string. So in this example, Loca.lize actually receives "Hello, {0}" as the format string, not "Hello, {name}".
Using the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting package you can achieve this.
You will need to create an object to store the data in, below a dynamic object is used. You could also create an specific class with all the properties required. The reason to wrap the dynamic object in a class in described here.
public class DynamicData
{
public dynamic Data { get; } = new ExpandoObject();
}
You can then use it as shown below.
var options = ScriptOptions.Default
.AddReferences(
typeof(Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException).GetTypeInfo().Assembly,
typeof(System.Runtime.CompilerServices.DynamicAttribute).GetTypeInfo().Assembly);
var globals = new DynamicData();
globals.Data.Name = "John";
globals.Data.MiddleName = "James";
globals.Data.Surname = "Jamison";
var text = "My name is {Data.Name} {Data.MiddleName} {Data.Surname}";
var result = await CSharpScript.EvaluateAsync<string>($"$\"{text}\"", options, globals);
This is compiling the snippet of code and executing it, so it is true C# string interpolation. Though you will have to take into account the performance of this as it is actually compiling and executing your code at runtime. To get around this performance hit if you could use CSharpScript.Create to compile and cache the code.
The C# 6.0 string interpolation won't help you if the format string is not in your C# source code. In that case, you will have to use some other solution, like this library.
If we use interpolation then we are thinking in terms of methods, not constants. In that case we could define our translations as methods:
public abstract class InterpolatedText
{
public abstract string GreetingWithName(string firstName, string lastName);
}
public class InterpolatedTextEnglish : InterpolatedText
{
public override string GreetingWithName(string firstName, string lastName) =>
$"Hello, my name is {firstName} {lastName}.";
}
We can then load an implementation of InterpolatedText for a specific culture. This also provides a way to implement fallback, as one implementation can inherit from another. If English is the default language and other implementations inherit from it, there will at least be something to display until a translation is provided.
This seems a bit unorthodox, but offers some benefits:
Primarily, the string used for interpolation is always stored in a strongly-typed method with clearly-specified arguments.
Given this: "Hello, my name is {0} {1}" can we determine that the placeholders represent first name and last name in that order? There will always be a method which matches values to placeholders, but there's less room for confusion when the interpolated string is stored with its arguments.
Similarly, if we store our translation strings in one place and use them in another, it becomes possible to modify them in a way that breaks the code using them. We can add {2} to a string which will be used elsewhere, and that code will fail at runtime.
Using string interpolation this is impossible. If our translation string doesn't match the available arguments it won't even compile.
There are drawbacks, although I see difficulty in maintaining any solution.
The greatest is portability. If your translation is coded in C# and you switch, it's not the easiest thing to export all of your translations.
It also means that if you wish to farm out translations to different individuals (unless you have one person who speaks everything) then the translators must modify code. It's easy code, but code nonetheless.
Interpolated strings can not refactored out from their (variable) scope because of using of the embedded variables in them.
The only way to relocate the string literal part is passing the scope bound variables as parameter to an other location, and mark their position in the string with special placeholders. However this solution is already "invented" and out there:
string.Format("literal with placeholers", parameters);
or some of advanced library (interpolating runtime), but using the very same concept (passing parameters).
Then you can refactor out the "literal with placeholers" to a resource.
C#6.0 have a string interpolation - a nice feature to format strings like:
var name = "John";
WriteLine($"My name is {name}");
The example is converted to
var name = "John";
WriteLine(String.Format("My name is {0}", name));
From the localization point of view, it is much better to store strings like :
"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}"
than in String.Format notation:
"My name is {0} {1} {2}"
How to use the string interpolation for .NET localization? Is there going to be a way to put $"..." to resource files? Or should strings be stored like "...{name}" and somehow interpolated on fly?
P.S. This question is NOT about "how to make string.FormatIt extension" (there are A LOT of such libraries, SO answers, etc.). This question is about something like Roslyn extension for "string interpolation" in "localization" context (both are terms in MS .NET vocabulary), or dynamic usage like Dylan proposed.
An interpolated string evaluates the block between the curly braces as a C# expression (e.g. {expression}, {1 + 1}, {person.FirstName}).
This means that the expressions in an interpolated string must reference names in the current context.
For example this statement will not compile:
var nameFormat = $"My name is {name}"; // Cannot use *name*
// before it is declared
var name = "Fred";
WriteLine(nameFormat);
Similarly:
class Program
{
const string interpolated = $"{firstName}"; // Name *firstName* does not exist
// in the current context
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var firstName = "fred";
Console.WriteLine(interpolated);
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
To answer your question:
There is no current mechanism provided by the framework to evaluate interpolated strings at runtime. Therefore, you cannot store strings and interpolate on the fly out of the box.
There are libraries that exist that handle runtime interpolation of strings.
According to this discussion on the Roslyn codeplex site, string interpolation will likely not be compatible with resource files (emphasis mine):
String interpolation could be neater and easier to debug than either String.Format or concatenation...
Dim y = $"Robot {name} reporting
{coolant.name} levels are {coolant.level}
{reactor.name} levels are {reactor.level}"
However, this example is fishy. Most professional programmers won't be writing
user-facing strings in code. Instead they'll be storing those strings in resources (.resw, .resx or .xlf) for reasons of localization. So there doesn't seem much use for string interpolation here.
Assuming that your question is more about how to localise interpolated strings in your source code, and not how to handle interpolated string resources...
Given the example code:
var name = "John";
var middlename = "W";
var surname = "Bloggs";
var text = $"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}";
Console.WriteLine(text);
The output is obviously:
My name is John W Bloggs
Now change the text assignment to fetch a translation instead:
var text = Translate($"My name is {name} {middlename} {surname}");
Translate is implemented like this:
public static string Translate(FormattableString text)
{
return string.Format(GetTranslation(text.Format),
text.GetArguments());
}
private static string GetTranslation(string text)
{
return text; // actually use gettext or whatever
}
You need to provide your own implementation of GetTranslation; it will receive a string like "My name is {0} {1} {2}" and should use GetText or resources or similar to locate and return a suitable translation for this, or just return the original parameter to skip translation.
You will still need to document for your translators what the parameter numbers mean; the text used in the original code string doesn't exist at runtime.
If, for example, in this case GetTranslation returned "{2}. {0} {2}, {1}. Don't wear it out." (hey, localisation is not just about language!) then the output of the full program would be:
Bloggs. John Bloggs, W. Don't wear it out.
Having said this, while using this style of translation is easy to develop, it's hard to actually translate, since the strings are buried in the code and only surface at runtime. Unless you have a tool that can statically explore your code and extract all the translatable strings (without having to hit that code path at runtime), you're better off using more traditional resx files, since they inherently give you a table of text to be translated.
As already said in previous answers: you currently cannot load the format string at runtime (e.g. from resource files) for string interpolation because it is used at compile time.
If you don't care about the compile time feature and just want to have named placeholders, you could use something like this extension method:
public static string StringFormat(this string input, Dictionary<string, object> elements)
{
int i = 0;
var values = new object[elements.Count];
foreach (var elem in elements)
{
input = Regex.Replace(input, "{" + Regex.Escape(elem.Key) + "(?<format>[^}]+)?}", "{" + i + "${format}}");
values[i++] = elem.Value;
}
return string.Format(input, values);
}
Be aware that you cannot have inline expressions like {i+1} here and that this is not code with best performance.
You can use this with a dictionary you load from resource files or inline like this:
var txt = "Hello {name} on {day:yyyy-MM-dd}!".StringFormat(new Dictionary<string, object>
{
["name"] = "Joe",
["day"] = DateTime.Now,
});
String interpolation is difficult to combine with localization because the compiler prefers to translate it to string.Format(...), which does not support localization. However, there is a trick that makes it possible to combine localization and string interpolation; it is described near the end of this article.
Normally string interpolation is translated to string.Format, whose behavior cannot be customized. However, in much the same way as lambda methods sometimes become expression trees, the compiler will switch from string.Format to FormattableStringFactory.Create (a .NET 4.6 method) if the target method accepts a System.FormattableString object.
The problem is, the compiler prefers to call string.Format if possible, so if there were an overload of Localized() that accepted FormattableString, it would not work with string interpolation because the C# compiler would simply ignore it [because there is an overload that accepts a plain string]. Actually, it's worse than that: the compiler also refuses to use FormattableString when calling an extension method.
It can work if you use a non-extension method. For example:
static class Loca
{
public static string lize(this FormattableString message)
{ return message.Format.Localized(message.GetArguments()); }
}
Then you can use it like this:
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Localize.UseResourceManager(Resources.ResourceManager);
var name = "Dave";
Console.WriteLine(Loca.lize($"Hello, {name}"));
}
}
It's important to realize that the compiler converts the $"..." string into an old-fashioned format string. So in this example, Loca.lize actually receives "Hello, {0}" as the format string, not "Hello, {name}".
Using the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting package you can achieve this.
You will need to create an object to store the data in, below a dynamic object is used. You could also create an specific class with all the properties required. The reason to wrap the dynamic object in a class in described here.
public class DynamicData
{
public dynamic Data { get; } = new ExpandoObject();
}
You can then use it as shown below.
var options = ScriptOptions.Default
.AddReferences(
typeof(Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException).GetTypeInfo().Assembly,
typeof(System.Runtime.CompilerServices.DynamicAttribute).GetTypeInfo().Assembly);
var globals = new DynamicData();
globals.Data.Name = "John";
globals.Data.MiddleName = "James";
globals.Data.Surname = "Jamison";
var text = "My name is {Data.Name} {Data.MiddleName} {Data.Surname}";
var result = await CSharpScript.EvaluateAsync<string>($"$\"{text}\"", options, globals);
This is compiling the snippet of code and executing it, so it is true C# string interpolation. Though you will have to take into account the performance of this as it is actually compiling and executing your code at runtime. To get around this performance hit if you could use CSharpScript.Create to compile and cache the code.
The C# 6.0 string interpolation won't help you if the format string is not in your C# source code. In that case, you will have to use some other solution, like this library.
If we use interpolation then we are thinking in terms of methods, not constants. In that case we could define our translations as methods:
public abstract class InterpolatedText
{
public abstract string GreetingWithName(string firstName, string lastName);
}
public class InterpolatedTextEnglish : InterpolatedText
{
public override string GreetingWithName(string firstName, string lastName) =>
$"Hello, my name is {firstName} {lastName}.";
}
We can then load an implementation of InterpolatedText for a specific culture. This also provides a way to implement fallback, as one implementation can inherit from another. If English is the default language and other implementations inherit from it, there will at least be something to display until a translation is provided.
This seems a bit unorthodox, but offers some benefits:
Primarily, the string used for interpolation is always stored in a strongly-typed method with clearly-specified arguments.
Given this: "Hello, my name is {0} {1}" can we determine that the placeholders represent first name and last name in that order? There will always be a method which matches values to placeholders, but there's less room for confusion when the interpolated string is stored with its arguments.
Similarly, if we store our translation strings in one place and use them in another, it becomes possible to modify them in a way that breaks the code using them. We can add {2} to a string which will be used elsewhere, and that code will fail at runtime.
Using string interpolation this is impossible. If our translation string doesn't match the available arguments it won't even compile.
There are drawbacks, although I see difficulty in maintaining any solution.
The greatest is portability. If your translation is coded in C# and you switch, it's not the easiest thing to export all of your translations.
It also means that if you wish to farm out translations to different individuals (unless you have one person who speaks everything) then the translators must modify code. It's easy code, but code nonetheless.
Interpolated strings can not refactored out from their (variable) scope because of using of the embedded variables in them.
The only way to relocate the string literal part is passing the scope bound variables as parameter to an other location, and mark their position in the string with special placeholders. However this solution is already "invented" and out there:
string.Format("literal with placeholers", parameters);
or some of advanced library (interpolating runtime), but using the very same concept (passing parameters).
Then you can refactor out the "literal with placeholers" to a resource.
Does .NET 3.5 C# allow us to include a variable within a string variable without having to use the + concatenator (or string.Format(), for that matter).
For example (In the pseudo, I'm using a $ symbol to specify the variable):
DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
string s = "The date is $d";
Console.WriteLine(s);
Output:
The date is 4/12/2011 11:56:39 AM
Edit
Due to the handful of responses that suggested string.Format(), I can only assume that my original post wasn't clear when I mentioned "...(or string.Format(), for that matter)". To be clear, I'm well aware of the string.Format() method. However, in my specific project that I'm working on, string.Format() doesn't help me (it's actually worse than the + concatenator).
Also, I'm inferring that most/all of you are wondering what the motive behind my question is (I suppose I'd feel the same way if I read my question as is).
If you are one of the curious, here's the short of it:
I'm creating a web app running on a Windows CE device. Due to how the web server works, I create the entire web page content (css, js, html, etc) within a string variable. For example, my .cs managed code might have something like this:
string GetPageData()
{
string title = "Hello";
DateTime date = DateTime.Now;
string html = #"
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC ...>
<html>
<head>
<title>$title</title>
</head>
<body>
<div>Hello StackO</div>
<div>The date is $date</div>
</body>
</html>
";
}
As you can see, having the ability to specify a variable without the need to concatenate, makes things a bit easier - especially when the content increases in size.
No, unfortunately C# is not PHP.
On the bright side though, C# is not PHP.
Almost, with a small extension method.
static class StringExtensions
{
public static string PHPIt<T>(this string s, T values, string prefix = "$")
{
var sb = new StringBuilder(s);
foreach(var p in typeof(T).GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance))
{
sb = sb.Replace(prefix + p.Name, p.GetValue(values, null).ToString());
}
return sb.ToString();
}
}
And now we can write:
string foo = "Bar";
int cool = 2;
var result = "This is a string $foo with $cool variables"
.PHPIt(new {
foo,
cool
});
//result == "This is a string Bar with 2 variables"
No, it doesn't. There are ways around this, but they defeat the purpose. Easiest thing for your example is
Console.WriteLine("The date is {0}", DateTime.Now);
string output = "the date is $d and time is $t";
output = output.Replace("$t", t).Replace("$d", d); //and so on
Based on the great answer of #JesperPalm I found another interesting solution which let's you use a similar syntax like in the normal string.Format method:
public static class StringExtensions
{
public static string Replace<T>(this string text, T values)
{
var sb = new StringBuilder(text);
var properties = typeof(T)
.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
.ToArray();
var args = properties
.Select(p => p.GetValue(values, null))
.ToArray();
for (var i = 0; i < properties.Length; i++)
{
var oldValue = string.Format("{{{0}", properties[i].Name);
var newValue = string.Format("{{{0}", i);
sb.Replace(oldValue, newValue);
}
var format = sb.ToString();
return string.Format(format, args);
}
}
This gives you the possibility to add the usual formatting:
var hello = "Good morning";
var world = "Mr. Doe";
var s = "{hello} {world}! It is {Now:HH:mm}."
.Replace(new { hello, world, DateTime.Now });
Console.WriteLine(s); // -> Good morning Mr. Doe! It is 13:54.
The short and simple answer is: No!
string.Format("The date is {0}", DateTime.Now.ToString())
No, But you can create an extension method on the string instance to make the typing shorter.
string s = "The date is {0}".Format(d);
string.Format (and similar formatting functions such as StringBuilder.AppendFormat) are the best way to do this in terms of flexibility, coding practice, and (usually) performance:
string s = string.Format("The date is {0}", d);
You can also specify the display format of your DateTime, as well as inserting more than one object into the string. Check out MSDN's page on the string.Format method.
Certain types also have overloads to their ToString methods which allow you to specify a format string. You could also create an extension method for string that allows you to specify a format and/or parse syntax like this.
How about using the T4 templating engine?
http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2009/05/01/visual-studios-t4-code-generation.aspx
If you are just trying to avoid concatenation of immutable strings, what you're looking for is StringBuilder.
Usage:
string parameterName = "Example";
int parameterValue = 1;
Stringbuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.Append("The output parameter ");
builder.Append(parameterName);
builder.Append("'s value is ");
builder.Append(parameterValue.ToString());
string totalExample = builder.ToString();
Since C# 6.0 you can write string "The title is \{title}" which does exactly what you need.
you can use something like this as mentioned in C# documentation.
string interpolation
string name = "Horace";
int age = 34;
Console.WriteLine($"He asked, \"Is your name {name}?\", but didn't wait for a reply :-{{");
Console.WriteLine($"{name} is {age} year{(age == 1 ? "" : "s")} old.");
Or combined:
Console.WriteLine("The date is {0}", DateTime.Now);
Extra info (in response to BrandonZeider):
Yep, it is kind-a important for people to realize that string conversion is automatically done. Manually adding ToString is broken, e.g.:
string value = null;
Console.WriteLine("The value is '{0}'", value); // OK
Console.WriteLine("The value is '{0}'", value.ToString()); // FAILURE
Also, this becomes a lot less trivial once you realize that the stringification is not equivalent to using .ToString(). You can have format specifiers, and even custom format format providers... It is interesting enough to teach people to leverage String.Format instead of doing it manually.