Resharper says OnPropertyChange set member can be private while not true - c#

I use C#, MVVM, WPF and Resharper.
When using the following code:
public bool CombiBanksSelected
{
get { return _selectedBanksType == ESelectedBanksType.CombiBanks; }
set
{
I get a warning of Resharper: Make set accessor private.
When making the set method private, I get an InvalidOperationException: A TwoWay or OneWayToSource binding cannot work on the read-only property ''CombiBanksSelected'' of type ''PcgTools.ViewModels.PcgViewModel.'
Of course I can suppress it by adding:
public bool CombiBanksSelected
{
get { return _selectedBanksType == ESelectedBanksType.CombiBanks; }
// ReSharper disable MemberCanBePrivate.Global
set
// ReSharper restore MemberCanBePrivate.Global
{
But this is not looking nice and not feeling good. Is there a better alternative or solution for this problem?
According to the answer I should change the XAML code. Mine is:
<UserControl x:Class="PcgTools.PcgWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:ViewModels="clr-namespace:PcgTools.ViewModels" Height="Auto" Width="Auto"
Loaded="Window_Loaded">
<Grid>
...
<RadioButton Content="_Programs" Height="16" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="12,12,0,0" Name="radioButtonPrograms" VerticalAlignment="Top"
IsChecked="{Binding Path=ProgramBanksSelected}" IsEnabled="{Binding Path=ProgramsEnabled}"/>
<RadioButton Content="_Combis" Height="16" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="85,12,0,0" Name="radioButtonCombis" VerticalAlignment="Top"
IsChecked="{Binding Path=CombiBanksSelected}" IsEnabled="{Binding Path=CombisEnabled}"/>
I have the Resharper problem for both (and more) properties binded to IsChecked (ProgramBanksSelected and CombiBanksSelected in the code above).
In the answer is shown that I should use a DataTemplate, but I still can't figure out how exactly (with not using MVVM light's Locator).
How should I use the data context/template?

Resharper doesn't have enough information to deduce the setter is being used.
For example:
This code:
public partial class Page2
{
public Page2()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new List<ViewModel>
{
new ViewModel()
};
}
}
public class ViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private bool _combiBanksSelected;
public bool CombiBanksSelected
{
get { return _combiBanksSelected; }
set
{
Set(()=>CombiBanksSelected, ref _combiBanksSelected, value);
}
}
}
with this Xaml:
<Grid>
<Grid.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="Template" >
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding CombiBanksSelected}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</Grid.Resources>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{StaticResource Template}" />
</Grid>
will show the setter as not being used (when SWA is turned on).
However if you change the Xaml (adding DataType="{x:Type Samples:ViewModel}") to:
<Grid>
<Grid.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="Template" DataType="{x:Type Samples:ViewModel}">
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding CombiBanksSelected}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</Grid.Resources>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{StaticResource Template}" />
</Grid>
R# now has enough information and doesn't show the warning.
Of course there are other ways of giving R# and VS Intellisense more hints about the types you're using. Examples are:
Using MVVM Light's view locator:
<UserControl ...
DataContext="{Binding AViewModel, Source={StaticResource Locator}}" />
Using d:DataContext. I recommend looking a this MSDN walkthrough
<UserControl ...
d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance AViewModel, IsDesignTimeCreatable=true}"
Explicitly setting the DataContext
<UserControl.Resources>
<AViewModel x:Key="theModel/>
</UserControl.Resources>
<Grid DataContext="{StaticResource theModel}"> ...
etc...
Any of these methods allow R# and VS to infer the use of types and provide intellisense.

In addition to Phil's excellent suggestions, you can also use the UsedImplicitlyAttribute. You can use Nuget to do add the dll for you
And then R# will itself offer to decorate the setter with the attribute:
public bool CombiBanksSelected
{
get { return _selectedBanksType == ESelectedBanksType.CombiBanks; }
[UsedImplicitly] set
{
I find it less noisy than a comment, and well suited to a ViewModel where it's understood that data bindings are typically unknown to R#. (sometimes I actually prefer a comment to remind me why I wanted R# to shut up, but not in this case).
Cheers,
Berryl

resharper is a great tool... but it can be wrong occasionally.
You should not annotate your source code with comments to please resharper. Or any other tool for that matter. The tool is wrong, so dont fix the code, fix the tool.
So tell resharper to ignore it. Right click on the icon in the leftmargin and tell it to ignore this kind of problem going forward, or put it in the hint category. I like that option because you can still acess the solution, if it applies, but r# does not show it in the graphical summary on the right.

Related

WPF plugin architecture itemscontrol binding not working

We encountered an interesting behavior on .Net 4.5 (4.6.2 also tested).
The project has multiple plugin dlls.
main exe will load DataTemplates (view) and ViewModels from DLLs using MEF.
if StepView and StepVm and main frame code are in one project (not using MEF), The 2 buttons I show below are working.
if move StepView and StepVm to plugin dll, only second button will work. First one shows binding error in output console. need to talk to manager if I can post error msg here, just wpf standard binding error.
Can anyone share some insights here?
Thanks.
StepView
<UserControl
x:Class="StepView"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:ScriptHighlighter"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance local:StepVm}"
d:DesignHeight="450"
d:DesignWidth="800"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="XItemsControl" ItemsSource="{Binding Names}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<Button
Content="Not Wokring in plugin mode"
Command="{Binding ElementName=XItemsControl, Path=DataContext.DeleteCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}" />
<Button
Content="Wokrs in plugin mode"
Command="{Binding Path=DataContext.DeleteCommand, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ItemsControl}, Mode=FindAncestor}}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
</Grid>
StepVm
public class StepVm:ViewModelBase
{
public StepVm()
{
this.Names = new List<string>(){"1", "2", "3"};
}
public List<string> Names { get; set; }
public ICommand DeleteCommand => new RelayCommand<string>(n =>
{
Debug.WriteLine($"logic to delete {n}");
});
}
Because MEF loads your UserControl dynamically into the Visual Tree, you are likely to have issues with NameScope, which I think is whats happening here.
WPF XAML Namescopes
To be honest, your use of ElementName binding is problematic, because your are in a DateTemplate which is an encapsulation boundary, so although it works outside MEF its not a typically supported scenario.

UWP+Prism MVVM - How do I set the value of a view model property via XAML?

I have a property in a view model which I would like to be able to set via the XAML but I can't figure out how to do it.
I have a pretty basic user control (containing a list of items), two of which are to be placed on a page and I would like to be able to set one to be a 'Source' (defined by an enum) and one to be a 'Target'.
[The code below has been stripped down quite a bit so apologies if I've accidentally made some mistakes or missed something out.]
My enumeration is:
public enum ConversionSide
{
Source, // Convert something FROM whatever is here.
Target // Convert something TO whatever is here.
}
I have a page which looks like this:
<Page
x:Class="MyApp.Views.ConverterPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:models="using:MyApp.Models"
xmlns:my="using:MyApp.Controls"
xmlns:prismMvvm="using:Prism.Windows.Mvvm"
prismMvvm:ViewModelLocator.AutoWireViewModel="True"
Style="{StaticResource PageStyle}"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="1*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="1*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<my:SelectorPage Name="SourceSelector" Grid.Column="0" />
<my:SelectorPage Name="TargetSelector" Grid.Column="1" />
</Grid>
</Page>
...where SelectorPage is a user control (I've called it a 'Page' to make the Prism AutoWire work but that's not the issue here) containing a list of items (all working fine) which looks like this...
<UserControl
x:Class="MyApp.Controls.SelectorPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:models="using:MyApp.Models"
xmlns:my="using:MyApp.Controls"
xmlns:prismMvvm="using:Prism.Windows.Mvvm"
prismMvvm:ViewModelLocator.AutoWireViewModel="True"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<ListView
Grid.Column="0"
ItemsSource="{x:Bind ViewModel.MyList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind ViewModel.MySelectedItem, Mode=TwoWay}">
<ListView.Header>
<TextBlock Margin="0,8,0,8" HorizontalAlignment="Center" FontStyle="Italic" Text="Header Text" />
</ListView.Header>
<ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListViewItem">
<Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch" />
</Style>
</ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="models:MyListItem">
<my:MyListItemTemplate />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
</UserControl>
..with code behind as...
public sealed partial class SelectorPage : UserControl
{
private SelectorViewModel ViewModel => DataContext as SelectorViewModel;
public SelectorPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
}
}
SelectorViewModel looks like this...
public class SelectorViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private ConversionSide _side;
public ConversionSide Side
{
get { return _side; }
set { SetProperty(ref _side, value); }
}
// Many lines have been omitted for 'clarity'.
}
I would like to be able to set the Side property of SelectorViewModel in XAML like this...
<my:SelectorPage Name="SourceSelector" Grid.Column="0" Side="Source" />
<my:SelectorPage Name="TargetSelector" Grid.Column="1" Side="Target" />
(Once Side has been set, I do not expect it to ever change.)
How can I do this?
I've looked at using a dependency property but I can't get it to change the property in SelectorViewModel. When I add one in SelectorPage it's visible in the XAML and I can set it but it doesn't actually do anything so I'm probably not using it right. Putting a dependency property in the view model doesn't sound right to me but I could be wrong.
I've had a look around the web - Microsoft documentation, blogs, articles, stack overflow, etc. - but I can't find anything that explains things well enough for me to figure out what I'm supposed to do. The writings I've found seem to be exclusively about getting information from a bound property - which I'm okay with - but what I'm after is setting a property from the XAML.
Can anyone give my any clues please? I don't know if I'm just a tiny step away from getting what I want or if I'm miles away.
This would set the Side property of the SelectorPage control to Source:
A view sets the property of a view model by two-way bind to it. For example, the following TextBox sets the string property of a view model called Test when you change the text in the TextBox:
<TextBox Text="{Binding Test, Mode=TwoWay}" />
So setting the property of a view model from the view typically applies to controls that handles some kind of input. Any default value of a source property should be defined in the view model:
private ConversionSide _side = ConversionSide.Source;
You shouldn't define the default values in the view.

mvvm light calling RaisePropertyChanged doesn't fire Property getter(windows phone 8.1)

in my application I have a textbox that user type a number on it. I want to this Latin number to Persian one as user type it. after calling RaisePropertychanged the getter of MobileNumber not called so App Ui doesn't update. what is the problem with my code?
here is my code
View.xaml
<Page
x:Class="CustomName.RegistrationPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:local="using:ShahrMobileBank.Views.Masters.Registration"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:behaviors="using:Template10.Behaviors"
xmlns:interactivity="using:Microsoft.Xaml.Interactivity"
xmlns:core="using:Microsoft.Xaml.Interactions.Core"
xmlns:converter="using:ShahrMobileBank.Converter"
mc:Ignorable="d"
DataContext="{Binding Path=RegistrationPage, Source={StaticResource ViewModelLocator}}">
<StackPanel Background="{StaticResource RegistrationPageBackgroundColor}" x:Name="LayoutRoot">
<StackPanel.Resources>
<converter:RegistrationConverter x:Key="RegistrationConverter"/>
</StackPanel.Resources>
<TextBox Style="{StaticResource GenericTextBoxBeforeLogin}" x:Uid="PhoneNumber" InputScope="Number" Text="{Binding Path=MobileNumber, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" MaxLength="{StaticResource MobileNumberMaxLength}"/>
</StackPanel>
</Page>
ViewModel.cs
public class RegistrationPageViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private string _mobileNumber;
public String MobileNumber
{
get
{
return _mobileNumber;
}
set
{
_mobileNumber = LangUtil.ConvertEnNumberToFaNumber(value); // this converts the number from Latin to Persian
RaisePropertyChanged(() => MobileNumber);
}
}
}
Try changing the RaisePropertyChanged line to RaisePropertyChanged("MobileNumber");
If you use the MVVM-Light Code snippets (if installed, you can start typing mvvm, and intellisense will pop up), you can look at mvvmpinpcwhich is one of the PropertyChanged code snippets. You can Tab through the different template fields to set it up to what you want, as well as possibly shed any light on little tips and tricks to make your coding life easier.

WPF ContextMenu = {x:Null} but still shows menu inside ContentControl

I need disable standard ContextMenu of TextBox. I've created a new WPF project and added the following:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication3.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Grid>
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBox ContextMenu="{x:Null}" VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Width="50"></TextBox>
</DataTemplate>
</ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
</ContentControl>
</Grid>
</Window>
But this is what i get :
The following code works fine :
<Grid>
<TextBox ContextMenu="{x:Null}" VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Width="50"></TextBox>
</Grid>
Why is this happening?
Update.
According to the accepted answer I've created a class derived from TextBox in order to be able to show parents ContextMenu.
public class TextBoxNoMenu: TextBox
{
public TextBoxNoMenu()
{
ContextMenu = null;
}
}
Why is this happening?
This is an interesting case of a control's behavior changing depending on where/how a property is set.
TextBox provides its own context menu by default. The only time it won't do this is when you explicitly set the local value of ContextMenu to null. This is what happens in your simple example where the TextBox is directly within in the Grid.
However, when you set a property inside a template, you're not actually setting a local value; you're setting a "parent template" value. If you inspect the value with DependencyPropertyHelper.GetValueSource(), you'll see the base value source is ParentTemplate instead of Local. Thus, the menu still gets overridden.
See Dependency Property Value Precedence for more information about the different kinds of dependency property value sources.
#OmegaMan's suggestion of assigning a 'hidden' context menu seems to work pretty well.
Note that while you mayhave disabled the ContextMenu on TextBox, if it's in another control, you may actually be seeing the ContextMenu of such a wrapper. Try Snooping it to see more specifically this sort of behaviour.
Note also that many of the default Control Templates throughout WPF can cause issues such as these by adding their own child objects. Seeing the default template for TextBox uses a Border and then <ScrollViewer Margin="0" x:Name="PART_ContentHost" />, you're likely seeing the ContextMenu of a child object if TextBox.
This seems to be a running issue where X:Null does not 'turn off' the default context menu. A better way would be to change it's visiblity:
<TextBox.ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu Visibility="Collapsed"/>
</TextBox.ContextMenu>
I had a similar issue, but I was generating my controls programmatically, and my parent control is a dockpanel. Based on the accepted answer, I decided to set the null value in the code behind.
<Grid>
<DockPanel>
<TextBox Name="txtBox" VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Width="50"></TextBox>
</DockPanel>
</Grid>
and then
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
txtBox.ContextMenu = null;
}
EDIT: I felt this was kind of a haphazard answer, as it doesn't fully or directly solve this question. I did some digging and if you implement the method found in the answer to This Question you can find the textbox in the code-behind.
So, if you have this
<Grid>
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBox Name="txtBox" VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Width="50"></TextBox>
</DataTemplate>
</ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
</ContentControl>
</Grid>
Then you should be able to find your textbox by name (txtBox in this case) and set the context menu to null
TextBox myTextBox = FindChild<TextBox>(Application.Current.MainWindow, "txtBox");
myTextBox.ContextMenu = null;
Personally I'd prefer this to creating a new class with inheritance, but whatever works for you. This still doesn't answer "Why is this happening?" but I think the accepted answer does a good job of that.

Listbox bound to ObservableCollection empty

I have the following xaml:
<Window x:Class="Retail_Utilities.Dialogs.AdjustPriceDialog"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
ShowInTaskbar="False"
WindowStartupLocation="CenterOwner" Name="Adjust_Price"
Title="Adjust Price" Background="#ee0e1c64" AllowsTransparency="True" WindowStyle="None" Height="330" Width="570" KeyDown="Window_KeyDown" Loaded="Window_Loaded">
<Grid Height="300" Width="550">
<ListBox HorizontalAlignment="Right" Margin="0,110,35,60" Name="lstReasons" Width="120" VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
ItemsSource="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType=Window, AncestorLevel=1}, Path=reasons}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=POS_Price_Change_Reason}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
</Window>
Here is the relevant c#:
namespace Retail_Utilities.Dialogs
{
public partial class AdjustPriceDialog : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason> reasons; ...
and finally, here is the code from another page that opens this window:
AdjustPriceDialog apd = new AdjustPriceDialog();
apd.Owner = (Window)this.Parent;
apd.reasons = new ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason>();
var pcr = from pc in ctx.Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reasons where pc.Deactivated_On == null select pc;
foreach (Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason pc in pcr)
{
apd.reasons.Add(pc);
}
apd.AdjustingDetail = (Twr_POS_Invoice_Detail)lstDetails.SelectedItem;
if (apd.ShowDialog() == true)
{
}
When the dialog box opens, my lstReasons list is empty. I don't get any errors and when I place a stop in the code, I see that the reasons collection gets populated with the items from the table.
Reasons needs to be a Property (add { get; set;} ). Also, look at Visual Studio Output - it shows Binding errors, there should be some info about failed binding to reasons.
The problem seems to be How you are creating the property.
I know you put your prperty as an observable collection but this doesn't mean it is by it self observalble!
so you need to notify the UI when this property is changed by doing something in the setter like this:
public ObservableCollection<Twr_POS_Price_Change_Reason> reasons
{
get{....}
set
{
Notify('reasons')
}
}
I don't remember the exact code because I didn't use WPF for a while but it is a method in INotifyPropertyChanged, good luck!
It seems your binding path is set to POS_Price_Change_Reason, while the name of your property is reasons. Unless you didn't include POS_Price_Change_Reason in your example code and reasons is the backing field for this property.
Also, keep in mind that you can only bind to public properties, not fields. Additionally, if you change the value of the property, you need to notify the view of this change, by invoking your PropertyChangedEventHandler event for that property:
PropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("YourPropertyName"));

Categories