We Keep Coding

how to search record from single table with multiple parameters using LINQ?

I am trying to search record(s) from table by appying multiple search parameters.
as per below snap.
here by using various parameters as per above snap i want to filter the records.
here user could enter any combination of parameter(s) to search record.
i tried something like below code hich works for single condition but fails for combination of any search paramets.
public List<students> SearchStudents(students search)
{
var result = new List<students>();
var records= from stud in db.students
where stud.enrollmentNumber== search.enrollmentNumber
|| stud.enrollmentDate==search.enrollmenttDate
|| stud.enrollmentType==search.enrollmentType
|| stud.className==search.className
select new Search()
{
enrollmentNumber= stud.enrollmentNumber,
enrollmentDate = stud.enrollmentDate,
enrollmentType = stud.enrollmentType,
Name = stud.Name,
className=stud.className,
Description = stud.Description
};
result = records.ToList();
return result;
}
but this is not working properly. means it returns same result whatever parameters I pass.
Like in the table i ahve 20 records and the enrollment number is the unique value field in DB so here when i am passing enrollment number thats like "2018-0001" it returns all records when it should return only single reocrd.
can someone guide me with this?

Without further explanation in your question about how this isn't working, the best we can do is guess. However, one very plausible reason for this is because you're including parameters you don't want to be filtering on.
Because you're using ORs in your statement, if any of those other properties are defaulted in the database, you're going to be returning those records. What you need to be doing is conditionally including your pieces of the WHERE clauses for only the properties that you want to search on. Unfortunately, that is not possible with the "SQL syntax" version of LINQ, so you will need to convert your query to that. (Good news: It's slightly more performant as well as it usually has to convert the SQL to the method syntax.)
Because of deferred execution, your query will not be sent to the database until you call a .ToList() or something to actually start processing the results. This allows you to chain method calls together, even if they are completely different C# statements. This is what you'll want to do:
public List<students> SearchStudents(students search)
{
var query = db.students;
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(search.enrollmentNumber))
{
query = query.Where(s => s.enrollmentNumber == search.enrollmentNumber);
}
if (search.enrollmentDate != DateTime.MinValue)
{
query = query.Where(s => s.enrollmentDate == search.enrollmentDate);
}
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(search.enrollmentType))
{
query = query.Where(s => s.enrollmentType == search.enrollmentType);
}
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(search.className))
{
query = query.Where(s => s.className == search.className);
}
return query.Select(stud => new Search
{
enrollmentNumber= stud.enrollmentNumber,
enrollmentDate = stud.enrollmentDate,
enrollmentType = stud.enrollmentType,
Name = stud.Name,
className=stud.className,
Description = stud.Description
})
.ToList();
}
You may need to adjust the if statements in there to accommodate different data types than what is intuitive from the names, but this will only add the filter if a value has been provided.

linq join on guid and string column

I'm new to linq. I need to run a query that joins two columns (AnonymousUser.AnonymousId being uniqueidentifier and comment.UserId being nvarchar(100)), something like below:
using (CommentEntities db = new CommentEntities())
{
// filteredComments is a query that is not run until the next .ToList()
IQueryable<Comment> filteredComments = this.CommentGetList(...);
var query = from comment in filteredComments
// following line is the syntax error, because columns' types don't match
join user in db.AnonymousUsers on comment.UserId equals user.AnonymousId into gj
from userNull in gj.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new CommentWithName
{
Comment = comment,
UserId = comment.UserId,
FirstName = (userNull == null ? "" : userNull.Name),
LastName = "",
Email = (userNull == null ? "" : userNull.Email)
};
return query.ToList();
}
First I was happy writing the query with .ToString() ! As it turns out that entity framework doesn't know how to translate it to sql. The same is true for Guid.Parse(string). Also new Guid(string) cannot be used in linq to entities (only parameterless constructors allowed)!
So after searching, I found out it's not possible doing such thing in EF 4.0! I migrated my code to a stored procedure that I'm not really happy about it.
Is it possible to tell entity framework to use a CAST in SQL?
Is there any solutions to this problem? Is there any way that I can bring the logic in code?
NOTE: I meant to do it in one GO. Otherwise one possible solution is to get Entities from first table, and put the Ids in a list and get entities from second table.

call toList() before applying those methods. Like:
var Product = db.Products.Where(p => p.ProductId == Guid.Parse("B4E913F9-166C-49BA-AADE-6DB889D1756F")).Single();
Would throw a
c# LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method "System.Guid Parse" (System.String)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression
But this works:
var Product = db.Products.ToList().Where(p => p.ProductId == Guid.Parse("B4E913F9-166C-49BA-AADE-6DB889D1756F")).Single()
p.s.: I think you will lose lazyloading but you can do eagerloading with .Include before calling .ToList().

If your list is object list you could convert it to the type which has Guid as identifier, first create new anonymous type and then filter it base on UserId, sure UserId which is of type int, wont include in join:
int output = 0;
var secondList = list.Where(x=>!int.TryParse(x.UserID, out output))
.Select(x=>new {Comment = x, ID = new Guid(x.UserID))
.ToList();
Now you could run your query on db by using secondList.

LINQ Querying Collection with different parameters

I have a list that I need to query based on about 10 different parameters that user pass to my program.
What s the best way to do it ?
ex:
List<Users>
Query params can be : username and/or user id and/or age etc.

What you are trying to achieve is composing a dynamic query in LINQ. You could do this in two ways:
using dynamic LINQ;
using PredicateBuilder by Joseph Albahari (recommended in this case);
Briefly, this is how to use PredicateBuilder in your case:
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<User>();
if (!string.IsNullOrWhitespace(username))
predicate = predicate.And(a => a.Username == username);
if (!string.IsNullOrWhitespace(whatever))
predicate = predicate.And(a => a.Whatever == whatever);
/* etc. etc. */
var filteredUsers = myUsers.Where(predicate);

I guess you're talking about filtering objects based on an initially unknown number of conditions.
LINQ does not evaluate your query until you explicitly ask so by enumerating it (using foreach, ToList(), ToArray()...). And when you do that, depending on the implementation of LINQ (SQL, objects, XML, etc), the query will be optimized.
AFAIK, all implementation are able to optimize "where condition1 where condition2" into "where condition1 && condition2".
Which means you just have to add your filtering conditions one by one. For instance:
private List<User> FilterUsers(string username, string userid, int? minAge, int? maxAge)
{
IEnumerable<User> query = GetUsers();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(username)) query = query.Where(u => u.Username.StartsWith(username);
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(userid)) query = query.Where(u => u.Userid == userid);
if (minAge != null) query = query.Where(u => u.Age >= minAge.Value);
if (maxAge != null) query = query.Where(u => u.Age <= maxAge.Value);
return query.ToList();
}
Here GetUsers() is supposed to return an IEnumerable. Can be a Table if you're using LINQ-to-SQL, ChildNodes() if you're using LINQ-to-XML. Try to enumerable the least possible before applying your where clauses.

I assume that you want to build the where part of your Linq query dynamically - I don't recommend that via a string (see link below) because it could introduce something similar to what is known as SQL injection to LINQ i.e. change of behaviour of the LINQ query with user-supplied params in ways you don't want...
That said check this link out http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/01/07/dynamic-linq-part-1-using-the-linq-dynamic-query-library.aspx - Scott Gu demonstrates something that comes close to what you describe including a library and some sample code...

What you want to do is have a method with the folowing signature
public void Filter(Func<Account, bool> filterExpression)
{
list.Where(filterExpression).ToList();
}
this way you can support filtering for various scenarios on the UI.
Not breaking the encapsulation of your (I assume) repository, that's why I do the ToList() so no IQueryable is sent to the client.

LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.String ToString()' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression

I'm migrating some stuff from one mysql server to a sql server but i can't figure out how to make this code work:
using (var context = new Context())
{
...
foreach (var item in collection)
{
IQueryable<entity> pages = from p in context.pages
where p.Serial == item.Key.ToString()
select p;
foreach (var page in pages)
{
DataManager.AddPageToDocument(page, item.Value);
}
}
Console.WriteLine("Done!");
Console.Read();
}
When it enters into the second foreach (var page in pages) it throws an exception saying:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.String
ToString()' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store
expression.
Anyone know why this happens?

Just save the string to a temp variable and then use that in your expression:
var strItem = item.Key.ToString();
IQueryable<entity> pages = from p in context.pages
where p.Serial == strItem
select p;
The problem arises because ToString() isn't really executed, it is turned into a MethodGroup and then parsed and translated to SQL. Since there is no ToString() equivalent, the expression fails.
Note:
Make sure you also check out Alex's answer regarding the SqlFunctions helper class that was added later. In many cases it can eliminate the need for the temporary variable.

As others have answered, this breaks because .ToString fails to translate to relevant SQL on the way into the database.
However, Microsoft provides the SqlFunctions class that is a collection of methods that can be used in situations like this.
For this case, what you are looking for here is SqlFunctions.StringConvert:
from p in context.pages
where p.Serial == SqlFunctions.StringConvert((double)item.Key.Id)
select p;
Good when the solution with temporary variables is not desirable for whatever reasons.
Similar to SqlFunctions you also have the EntityFunctions (with EF6 obsoleted by DbFunctions) that provides a different set of functions that also are data source agnostic (not limited to e.g. SQL).

The problem is that you are calling ToString in a LINQ to Entities query. That means the parser is trying to convert the ToString call into its equivalent SQL (which isn't possible...hence the exception).
All you have to do is move the ToString call to a separate line:
var keyString = item.Key.ToString();
var pages = from p in context.entities
where p.Serial == keyString
select p;

Cast table to Enumerable, then you call LINQ methods with using ToString() method inside:
var example = contex.table_name.AsEnumerable()
.Select(x => new {Date = x.date.ToString("M/d/yyyy")...)
But be careful, when you calling AsEnumerable or ToList methods because you will request all data from all entity before this method. In my case above I read all table_name rows by one request.

Had a similar problem.
Solved it by calling ToList() on the entity collection and querying the list.
If the collection is small this is an option.
IQueryable<entity> pages = context.pages.ToList().Where(p=>p.serial == item.Key.ToString())
Hope this helps.

Upgrading to Entity Framework Version 6.2.0 worked for me.
I was previously on Version 6.0.0.
Hope this helps,

Change it like this and it should work:
var key = item.Key.ToString();
IQueryable<entity> pages = from p in context.pages
where p.Serial == key
select p;
The reason why the exception is not thrown in the line the LINQ query is declared but in the line of the foreach is the deferred execution feature, i.e. the LINQ query is not executed until you try to access the result. And this happens in the foreach and not earlier.

If you really want to type ToString inside your query, you could write an expression tree visitor that rewrites the call to ToString with a call to the appropriate StringConvert function:
using System.Linq;
using System.Data.Entity.SqlServer;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using static System.Linq.Expressions.Expression;
using System;
namespace ToStringRewriting {
class ToStringRewriter : ExpressionVisitor {
static MethodInfo stringConvertMethodInfo = typeof(SqlFunctions).GetMethods()
.Single(x => x.Name == "StringConvert" && x.GetParameters()[0].ParameterType == typeof(decimal?));
protected override Expression VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression node) {
var method = node.Method;
if (method.Name=="ToString") {
if (node.Object.GetType() == typeof(string)) { return node.Object; }
node = Call(stringConvertMethodInfo, Convert(node.Object, typeof(decimal?));
}
return base.VisitMethodCall(node);
}
}
class Person {
string Name { get; set; }
long SocialSecurityNumber { get; set; }
}
class Program {
void Main() {
Expression<Func<Person, Boolean>> expr = x => x.ToString().Length > 1;
var rewriter = new ToStringRewriter();
var finalExpression = rewriter.Visit(expr);
var dcx = new MyDataContext();
var query = dcx.Persons.Where(finalExpression);
}
}
}

In MVC, assume you are searching record(s) based on your requirement or information.
It is working properly.
[HttpPost]
[ActionName("Index")]
public ActionResult SearchRecord(FormCollection formcollection)
{
EmployeeContext employeeContext = new EmployeeContext();
string searchby=formcollection["SearchBy"];
string value=formcollection["Value"];
if (formcollection["SearchBy"] == "Gender")
{
List<MvcApplication1.Models.Employee> emplist = employeeContext.Employees.Where(x => x.Gender == value).ToList();
return View("Index", emplist);
}
else
{
List<MvcApplication1.Models.Employee> emplist = employeeContext.Employees.Where(x => x.Name == value).ToList();
return View("Index", emplist);
}
}

I got the same error in this case:
var result = Db.SystemLog
.Where(log =>
eventTypeValues.Contains(log.EventType)
&& (
search.Contains(log.Id.ToString())
|| log.Message.Contains(search)
|| log.PayLoad.Contains(search)
|| log.Timestamp.ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture).Contains(search)
)
)
.OrderByDescending(log => log.Id)
.Select(r => r);
After spending way too much time debugging, I figured out that error appeared in the logic expression.
The first line search.Contains(log.Id.ToString()) does work fine, but the last line that deals with a DateTime object made it fail miserably:
|| log.Timestamp.ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture).Contains(search)
Remove the problematic line and problem solved.
I do not fully understand why, but it seems as ToString() is a LINQ expression for strings, but not for Entities. LINQ for Entities deals with database queries like SQL, and SQL has no notion of ToString(). As such, we can not throw ToString() into a .Where() clause.
But how then does the first line work? Instead of ToString(), SQL have CAST and CONVERT, so my best guess so far is that linq for entities uses that in some simple cases. DateTime objects are not always found to be so simple...

My problem was that I had a 'text' data type for this column (due to a migration from sqlite).
Solution: just change the data type to 'nvarchar()' and regenerate the table.
Then Linq accepts the string comparison.

I am working on retiring Telerik Open Access and replacing it with Entity Framework 4.0. I came across same issue that telerik:GridBoundColumn filtering stopped working.
I find out that its not working only on System.String DataTypes. So I found this thread and solved it by just using .List() at the end of my Linq query as follows:
var x = (from y in db.Tables
orderby y.ColumnId descending
select new
{
y.FileName,
y.FileSource,
y.FileType,
FileDepartment = "Claims"
}).ToList();

Just turn the LINQ to Entity query into a LINQ to Objects query (e.g. call ToArray) anytime you need to use a method call in your LINQ query.

Lambda syntax in linq to db4o?

I know the following is possible with linq2db4o
from Apple a in db
where a.Color.Equals(Colors.Green)
select a
What I need however is something that allows me to build my query conditionally (like I can in other linq variants)
public IEnumerable<Apple> SearchApples (AppleSearchbag bag){
var q = db.Apples;
if(bag.Color != null){
q = q.Where(a=>a.Color.Equals(bag.Color));
}
return q.AsEnumerable();
}
In a real world situation the searchbag will hold many properties and building a giant if-tree that catches all possible combinations of filled in properties would be madman's work.
It is possible to first call
var q = (from Color c in db select c);
and then continue from there. but this is not exactly what I'm looking for.
Disclaimer: near duplicate of my question of nearly 11 months ago.
This one's a bit more clear as I understand the matter better now and I hope by now some of the db4o dev eyes could catch this on this:
Any suggestions?

Yes it's definitely possible to compose optimized LINQ queries using db4o. Granted that db is defined as follows:
IObjectContainer db;
Here is your query:
public IEnumerable<Apple> SearchApples (AppleSearchbag bag)
{
var query = db.Cast<Apple> ();
// query will be a Db4objects.Db4o.Linq.IDb4oLinqQuery<Apple>
if (bag.Color != null)
query = query.Where (a => a.Color == bag.Color);
return query;
}
In that case, the query will be executed whenever the returned enumerable is being iterated over.
Another possibility is to use the IQueryable mechanism, that has the advantage of being better recognized by developers:
public IQueryable<Apple> SearchApples (AppleSearchbag bag)
{
var query = db.AsQueryable<Apple> ();
// query will be a System.Linq.IQueryble<Apple>
if (bag.Color != null)
query = query.Where (a => a.Color == bag.Color);
return query;
}
In both cases, db4o will try to deduce an optimized query from the lambda expression upon execution, and if it fails, will fallback to LINQ to objects. The first one has the advantage of being more direct, by avoiding the queryable to LINQ to db4o transformation.