I used to work in VB.net and used Dataset's all the time when working with ADO, but now i'm Working in C# and the Research is showing me a lot of Recordsets.
Are they the same thing?
If no what is the difference?
Datasets vs RecordSets
Essentially it is to do with how it fetches the data and allows you to intereact with it, recordsets would typically only allow you to fetch data from one table at a time (with default settings) whereas datasets can retrieve the entire set of data. there is more information at that link
Dataset is a connectionless data holder whereas RecordSet is connection oriented Data holder.Though DataSet you can refer more than 1 table at a time, but in the case of Recordset only 1 table is processed at a time. Through Dataset you can process more than 1 record,but in case of recordset recordset you have to make travesel to each record and after that you can make processing.
a direct quote backing up what i said
Difference between ADO.NET Dataset and ADO Recordset?
ADO.NET is an object-oriented set of libraries that allows you to interact with data sources.
http://www.job4india.in/interview-questions/net-interview-questions
ADO :-
1.It is a COM based library.
2.Classic ADO requires active connection with the data store.
3.Locking feature is available.
4.Data is stored in binary format.
5.XML integration is not possible.
ADO.NET :-
1.It is a CLR based library.
2.ADO.NET architecture works while the data store is disconnected.
3.Locking feature is not available.
4.Data is stored in XML.
Read More :- http://www.job4india.in/net-interview-questions/what-difference-between-ado-and-adonet
No, the DataSet class (System.Data namespace) has the same name in C#. I'm not familiar with anything called recordset in ADO.NET (whereas I am with DataSet). Could you post some examples?
Related
I often use the DataTable class in my .NET WCF services, since many of our SPs require TVPs. As far as I know, DataTables are the only way of passing TVPs to SPs.
It just occurred to me that similarly to how tables, in which information is stored according to rows and columns are useful, that the DataTable class may be useful beyond just as a means of interfacing with SQL Server TVPs.
Actually... thinking about this, I have previously written code that iterated over a DataTable's rows, building up an HTML string. However the main reason we used a DataTable as because the same table could be passed to SQL Server as a TVP.
Looking at the docs: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.datatable%28v=vs.110%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396, it looks like you can effectively create relational object models using DataTables.
Would using DataTables be an effective way of caching data retrieved from a SQL Server in a service?
Another potential use-case that comes to mind... Would there be any benefit of using a DataTable for a collection instead of List<MyType>?
Datatables are slower than Lists/Enumerables, and its better to use dataAdapter while reading data if you really care about performance.
But Datatables can be really useful as a item source for grids, where you want to just publish whole table data on the UI and no need to specify each column individually as in the case of List.
I'm trying to learn to use SQLite, but I'm very frustrated and confused. I've gotten as far as finding System.Data.SQLite, which is apparently the thing to use for SQLite in C#.
The website has no documentation whatsoever. The "original website", which is apparently obsolete from 2010 onwards, has no documentation either. I could find a few blog tutorials, but from what I can tell their method of operation is basically:
Initialize a database connection.
Feed SQL statements into the connection.
Take out stuff that comes out of the connection.
Close connection.
I don't want to write SQL statements in my C# code, they're ugly and I get no assistance from the IDE because I have to put the SQL code in strings.
Can't I just:
Create a DataSet.
Tell the DataSet that it should correspond to the SQLite database MyDB.sqlite.
Manipulate the DataSet using its member functions.
Not worry about SQLite because the DataSet automatically keeps itself in sync with the SQLite database on disc.
I know that I can fill a DataSet with the contents of a database, but if I want access to the entire database I will have to fill the DataSet with all of its contents. If my database is 1 GB, I have just used up 1 GB of RAM (not to mention the time needed to write all of it at once).
Can't I simply take a SQLite database connection and pretend it's just an ordinary DataSet (that perhaps needs to be asked occasionally if it's done syncing yet)?
The answer to the question is no.
No you cannot simply take a SQLite connection pretend it's just a DataSet.
If you don't want to code SQL statements then consider Entity Framework.
Using SQLite Embedded Database with Entity Framework and Linq-to-SQL
You shouldn't treat a DataSet as a database. It's just a result of a query.
You query the database to get a subset of data (you never want ALL the data from your DB) and this subset is used to populate your DataSet.
You are required to synchronize your changes manually because DataSet doesn't know which updates should be a part of which transaction. This is your system knowledge.
The DataSet is an in memory cache and will only synchronize to the underlying data store when the developer allows it. You could put a timer wrapper around in and do it on a schedule but you still need to keep the Dataset and data store synchronized manually.
Storing 1GB+ of data is really not recommended as the memory usage would be very high and the performance very low. You also don't want to be sending that amount of data over a network or god forbid an internet connection.
Why would you want to keep 1GB of data in memory?
Suppose that, I use Oracle database. If my table have a lot of data about 10k records. When I use OleDB to select data from that table in ASP.NET. It's very slow.
Is there any methods that better than OleDB Oracle client?
Accessing 10k rows is not much. If it is for analytical reasons that you want to make calculations based on the data, use Oracle Analytical functions. They are VERY powerfull. By the time you accessed all rows and passed them to the client to have the analysis done on the client, the analysis has already been done by Oracle.
Do the analysis as close to where your data is as possible: in the rdbms.
See
Dan's library
Oracle documentation
ask Tom
Oracle Data Provider for .NET is a native implementation.
When using a Class to get one row of Data from the Database what is best to use:
A DataSet?
A Reader and do what store the data in a Structure?
What else?
Thanks for your time, Nathan
A DataReader is always your best choice--provided that it is compatible with your usage. DataReaders are very fast, efficient, and lightweight--but they carry the requirement that you maintain an active/open db connection for their lifecycle, this means they can't be marshalled across AppDomains (or across webservices, etc).
DataSets are actually populated by DataReaders--they are eager-loaded (all data is populated before any is accessed) and are therefore less performant, but they have the added benefit of being serializable (they're essentially just a DTO) and that means they're easy to carry across AppDomains or webservices.
The difference is sometimes summed up by saying "DataReaders are ideal for ADO.NET ONLINE (implying that it's fine to keep the db connection open) whereas DataSets are ideal for ADO.NET OFFLINE (where the consumer can't necessarily connect directly to the database).
DataAdapter (which fills a DataSet) uses a DataReader to do so.
So, DataReader is always more lightweight and easier to use than a DataAdapter. DataSets and DataTables always have a huge overhead in terms of memory usage. Makes no difference if you are fetching a single row, but makes a huge difference for bigger result sets.
If you are fetching a fixed number of items, in MS SQL Server, output variables from a stored proc (or parameterized command) usually perform best.
if you use a reader you must have a open connection to your database generally a DataReader is used for fetch a combo or dataGrid, but if you want to stock your data in memory and you close our data base connexion you must use Datatable
Note : excuse my english level
If you just want read-only access to the data, then go with a raw DataReader; it's the fasted and most lightweight data access method.
However, if you intend to alter the data and save back to the database, then I would recommend using a DataAdapter and a DataSet (even a typed DataSet) because the DataSet class takes care of tracking changes, additions and deletions to the set which makes saves much easier. Additionally, if you have multiple tables in the dataset, you can model the referential constraints between them in the dataset.
I am bit new to C#. I am working on a Database application and I need to execute a query say a SELECT and load it in to some sort of table view. Then I want to double click on a result and get it loaded to my original data entry form. Can someone tell me the way that I should follow? Dont waste your time to add coding etc. Simply the steps would be enough. A link to a good resource is also be OK :)
Have a look at SqlCommand, SqlDataAdapter and DataTable to retrieve data from the DB. Assuming SQL server, otherwise other DB providers are also available and implement the same API.
For Window Forms look at DataGridView, you can bind a DataTable to it and it will display the data in the DataTable
You can find an example over here
Loot at some samples:
Database Viewer (in sources) http://www.codeproject.com/KB/database/MyDbViewerSite.aspx
Also look at this http-support.microsoft.com/kb/308247
Future Readings:
Data Access Application Block #MSDN
Various Object Relational Mappers (LinqToSQL, Entity Framework, NHibernate etc)
http://www.java2s.com/Code/CSharp/Database-ADO.net/FillDatafromdatabasetabletoListView.htm
ADO.NET
SUMMARY: ADO.NET is a data-access
technology that enables applications
to connect to data stores and
manipulate data contained in them in
various ways. It is based on the .NET
Framework and it is highly integrated
with the rest of the Framework class
library. The ADO.NET API is designed
so it can be used from all programming
languages that target the .NET
Framework, such as Visual Basic, C#,
J# and Visual C++.