Copying data from var to DataTable after LINQ query - c#

I am using LINQ query to filter data from a datatable and placing the data in to another datatable. For this I am using foreach statement to copy values from var to datatable. The datatable will be containing a very huge no. of rows so can you suggest me a way in which I can do the copying in a single go?
var drdatedisp = from row in dtfullreport.AsEnumerable()
group row by row.Field<string>("Order_Date") into g
select new
{
Order_Date = g.Key,
totalQnty = g.Sum(a => a.Field<int>("Item_Quantity")),
totalTax = g.Sum(a => float.Parse(a.Field<decimal>("TAXAMT").ToString())),
totalAmt = g.Sum(a => float.Parse(a.Field<decimal>("VALAMT").ToString()))
};
DataTable dtdatedisp = new DataTable();
dtdatedisp.Columns.Add("Order_Date");
dtdatedisp.Columns.Add("Item_Quantity");
dtdatedisp.Columns.Add("TAXAMT");
dtdatedisp.Columns.Add("VALAMT");
dtdatedisp.Rows.Clear();
foreach (var g in drdatedisp)
{
DataRow newRow1 = dtdatedisp.NewRow();
newRow1[0] = g.Order_Date;
newRow1[1] = g.totalQnty;
newRow1[2] = String.Format("{0:0.00}", g.totalTax);
newRow1[3] = String.Format("{0:0.00}", g.totalAmt);
dtdatedisp.Rows.Add(newRow1);
}
}
please see that there will be very less no of iterations....
is there any way ?? Can you Help me ??

There is a extension method called CopyToDataTable which is unfortunately on IEnumerable Data Row object. But with the use of following link, you can create/copy same extension method which will be called on any IEnumerable object And this would match your requirement.
Here is the link
With this you can directly write something like this in your code
drdatedisp.CopyToDataTable();

use CopyToDataTable(); Verified the result:
var results = (from myRow in myData.AsEnumerable()
where myRow.Field<double>("Num1") == 1
select myRow).CopyToDataTable();
DataTable dtTemp = (DataTable)results;
gvMain.DataSource = dtTemp;

Related

Convert datatable to another datatable By Linq C#?

i have a Datatable in which there are Columns are
Assigned to
Storyid,
Completed,
Effort. assigned to person can have Same Storyid with diffrent or same (Completed,Effort hours)(image attached)
input datatable
i want dataTable to like in this form where Assigned to Effort and completed hours will be Sum and there storyid's(image attached below
output datatable
I hope this is what you are looking for
var result = yourDatatable
.GroupBy(e => e.AssignedTo)
.ToList()
.Select(eg => new
{
AssignedTo = eg.Key,
CompletedSum = eg.Sum(p=>p.completed),
EfforSum = eg.Sum(p=>p.effort),
StoryIds = string.Join(",", eg.Select(i => i.storyid))
});

FileNames in a DataTable - First Column

Is there a way to get the list of FileNames in a DataTable without using a foreach loop?
DataTable dtOutput = new DataTable();
dtOutput.Columns.Add("FileName", typeof(string));
dtOutput.Columns.Add(Col2..., typeof(decimal));
...
foreach (string file in Directory.EnumerateFiles(txtBoxReadFrom.Text, txtBoxTargetFilter.Text))
{
dtOutput.Rows.Add(Path.GetFileName(file));
}
progressBar1.Maximum = dtOutput.Rows.Count;
Linq hides the loops from you, it uses them anyway:
List<String> allFileNames = dtOutput.AsEnumerable()
.Select(r => r.Field<string>("FileName"))
.ToList();
But why do you want a list at all when you already have the table which is also an in-memory collection?
If you want to diplays these file-names in another multiline TextBox you can use:
txtBoxWriteTo.Lines = dtOutput.AsEnumerable()
.Select(r => r.Field<string>("FileName"))
.ToArray();
Convert the DataTable object to Enumerable().
Apply the select clause with the column name as field name.
Cast it to a string array.
string[] strSummCities = dtTemp1.AsEnumerable().Select(s => s.Field<string>("City")).ToArray<string>();
Hope this will help t resolve your query.
you should add a reference to System.Data.DataSetExtension in order to have the CopyToDataTable() for enumerable values, after this you can use:
DataTable dtOutput =
Directory.EnumerateFiles(txtBoxReadFrom.Text, txtBoxTargetFilter.Text).Select(r =>
{
DataRow row = dtOutput.NewRow();
row["fileName"] = r;
return row;
}).CopyToDataTable();

LINQ: Add RowNumber Column

How can the query below be modified to include a column for row number (ie: one-based index of results)?
var myResult = from currRow in someTable
where currRow.someCategory == someCategoryValue
orderby currRow.createdDate descending
select currRow;
EDIT1: I'm looking for the results to be {idx, col1, col2...col-n} not {idx, row}.
EDIT2: The row number should correspond to result rows not the table rows.
EDIT3: I DataBind these results to a GridView. My goal was to add a row number column to the GridView. Perhaps a different approach would be better.
Use the method-syntax where Enumerable.Select has an overload with the index:
var myResult = someTable.Select((r, i) => new { Row = r, Index = i })
.Where(x => x.Row.someCategory == someCategoryValue)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Row.createdDate);
Note that this approach presumes that you want the original index of the row in the table and not in the filtered result since i select the index before i filter with Where.
EDIT: I'm looking for the results to be {idx, col1, col2...col-n} not
{idx, row}. The row number should correspond to result rows not
the table rows.
Then select the anonymous type with all columns you need:
var myResult = someTable.Where(r => r.someCategory == someCategoryValue)
.OrderByDescending(r => r.createdDate)
.Select((r, i) => new { idx = i, col1 = r.col1, col2 = r.col2, ...col-n = r.ColN });
Use this Select method:
Projects each element of a sequence into a new form by incorporating the element's index.
Example:
var myResult = someTable.Where(currRow => currRow.someCategory == someCategoryValue)
.OrderByDescending(currRow => currRow.createdDate)
.Select((currRow, index) => new {Row = currRow, Index = index + 1});
In response to your edit:
If you want a DataTable as result, you can go the non-Linq way by simply using a DataView and add a additional column afterwards.
someTable.DefaultView.RowFilter = String.Format("someCategory = '{0}'", someCategoryValue);
someTable.DefaultView.Sort = "createdDate";
var resultTable = someTable.DefaultView.ToTable();
resultTable.Columns.Add("Number", typeof(int));
int i = 0;
foreach (DataRow row in resultTable.Rows)
row["Number"] = ++i;
what about?
int i;
var myResult = from currRow in someTable
where currRow.someCategory == someCategoryValue
orderby currRow.createdDate descending
select new {Record = i++, currRow};
Just for fun, here's an alternative to Select with two arguments:
var resultsWithIndexes = myResult.Zip(Enumerable.Range(1, int.MaxValue - 1),
(o, i) => new { Index = i, Result = o });
According to you edit 1. NO, YOU CAN'T Linq returns the table as it is. You can build each column, but you lose the power of mapped entities.
This has been asked multiple times before: How do you add an index field to Linq results
There is no straightforward way if want to keep a flat list of columns (i.e. OP's Edit2) and also want a generic solution that works with any IEnumerable without requiring you to list out the set of expected columns.
However, there is a roundabout way to kinda go about it which is to dump the query results into a DataTable using the ToDataTable() method from here and then add a RowNumber column to that table.
var table = query.ToList().ToDataTable();
table.Columns.Add("RowNum", typeof(int));
int i = 0;
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows)
row["RowNum"] = ++i;
This would likely cause performance issues with large datasets but it's not insanely slow either. On my machine a dataset with ~6500 rows took 33ms to process.
If your original query returned an anonymous type, then that type definition will get lost in the conversion so you'll lose the static typing on the column names of the resulting IEnumerable when you call table.AsEnumerable(). In other words, instead of being able to write something like table.AsEnumerable().First().RowNum you instead have to write table.AsEnumerable().First()["RowNum"]
However, if you don't care about performance and really want your static typing back, then you can use JSON.NET to convert the DataTable to a json string and then back to a list based on the anonymous type from the original query result. This method requires a placeholder RowNum field to be present in the original query results.
var query = (from currRow in someTable
where currRow.someCategory == someCategoryValue
orderby currRow.createdDate descending
select new { currRow.someCategory, currRow.createdDate, RowNum = -1 }).ToList();
var table = query.ToDataTable();
//Placeholder RowNum column has to already exist in query results
//So not adding a new column, but merely populating it
int i = 0;
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows)
row["RowNum"] = ++i;
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(table);
var staticallyTypedList = JsonConvert.DeserializeAnonymousType(json, query);
Console.WriteLine(staticallyTypedList.First().RowNum);
This added about 120ms to the processing time for my 6500 item dataset.
It's crazy, but it works.
I know I'm late to the party, but I wanted to show what worked for me.
I have a list of objects, and the object has an integer property on it for "row number"... or in this case, "Sequence Number". This is what I did to populate that field:
myListOfObjects = myListOfObjects.Select((o, i) => { o.SequenceNumber = i; return o; }).ToList();
I was surprised to see that this worked.
This one helped me in my case - Excel sheet extraction. anonymous type
var UploadItemList = ItemMaster.Worksheet().AsEnumerable().Select((x, index) => new
{
Code = x["Code"].Value == null ? "" : x["Code"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
Description = x["Description"].Value == null ? "" : x["Description"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
Unit = x["Unit"].Value == null ? "" : x["Unit"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
Quantity = x["Quantity"].Value == null ? "" : x["Quantity"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
Rate = x["Rate"].Value == null ? "" : x["Rate"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
Amount = x["Amount"].Value == null ? "" : x["Amount"].Value.ToString().Trim(),
RowNumber = index+1
}).ToList();
int Lc = 1;
var Lst = LstItemGrid.GroupBy(item => item.CategoryName)
.Select(group => new { CategoryName = group.Key, Items = group.ToList() ,RowIndex= Lc++ })
.ToList();

c# LINQ to dataset IN clause contains, group, min

I am new to LINQ but am trying to tackle a tough one right off the bat. I am trying to do LINQ to dataset and emulate the following query...
SELECT smID, MIN(entID) FROM table
WHERE exID = :exID
AND smID IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, etc)
GROUP BY smID
The code I have so far is as follows...
DataTable dt = ds.Tables["myTable"];
var query =
from g in dt.AsEnumerable()
where g.Field<string>("exID") == exID
&& smIDs.Contains(g.Field<string>("smID"))
group g by g.Field<string>("smID") into rowGroup
select new
{
smID = rowGroup.Key,
minEntID = rowGroup.Min(g => g.Field<int>("entID"))
};
exID is a string variable in the method and smIDs is a List of strings also created earlier in the method. I created the following code to try and see my results and it throws an "System.InvalidCastException" error at query.Count...
if (query.Count() > 0)
{
foreach (var item in query)
{
string s = item.smID;
int i = (int)item.minEntID;
}
}
I have been unable to figure out what I am doing wrong.
VS points to...
minEntID = rowGroup.Min(g => g.Field<int>("entID"))
This is the first two lines of the stack trace...
at System.Data.DataRowExtensions.UnboxT`1.ValueField(Object value)
at System.Data.DataRowExtensions.Field[T](DataRow row, String columnName)
Any pointers would be most appreciated. Thanks.
Judging by the exception and stack trace, the type you're specifying for the endID field in your query doesn't match the DataType for that column in the DataTable. These must match -- you cannot use the Field method to cast the value to a different type.
I used Linqer to come up with this code:
from t in db.Table // your C# table / collection here, of course
where t.ExId == stackoverflow.ExId
&& (new int[] {1, 2, 3 }).Contains(t.SmId)
group t by new { t.SmId } into g
select new {
SmId = g.Key.SmId,
minEntID = g.Min(p => p.EntId)
}

Convert var to DataTable

I have var item which I want to convert in to a Datatable.
How can I do this.
var items = (from myObj in this.Context.Orders
group myObj by myObj.OrderDate.ToString("yyyy-mm")
into ymGroup
select new { Date = ymGroup.Key, Start = ymGroup.Min(c => c.OrderId), End = ymGroup.Max(c => c.OrderId) });
I need to convert the items into a DataTable. I don't want to use any foreach loop.
How can I do this.?
have a look on:http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/VIMAL.LAKHERA/LINQResultsetToDatatable06242008042629AM/LINQResultsetToDatatable.aspx

Categories