I have spent quite some time figuring out how to do this but did not find any usefull solution.
Here is what I want to do. I am generating a huge binary file in my application. The tricky thing is that, the process requires me to occasionally close the FileStream.
The problem now is, that occasionally other applications (i.e. my virus scanner) are using this brief moment where the file is not locked anymore, to lock the file itself. or other applications like dropbox etc...
The result is, that next time I need to open the file stream, it says that it is locked by another process. All this only happens very rarely but it is still annoying when it happens.
And even if i still get the file access, I still don't want i.e. dropbox to upload this file until its done (which can take several minutes).
What I would need is a possibility to manually lock a file so that my application can still open file streams on this file, but no other application can until I manually unlock it again.
I picture something like this in pseudocode:
File.Lock(filepath);
//... do something that opens and closes filestreams on this file
File.Unlock(filepath);
Is there a way to do this? The solution "keep the file stream open" is not valid. I explicitly try to avoid that so please keep that in mind.
As you noticed yourself, the best way to lock a file is to open a handle to it using a FileStream. Your main FileStream gets closed, you say, but you can simulate a lock using one. Here's a sample class, using IDisposable so that the FileLock object itself is the lock, and disposing it releases it:
public class FileLock : IDisposable
{
private FileStream _lock;
public FileLock(string path)
{
if (File.Exists(path))
{
_lock = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.None);
IsLocked = true;
}
}
public bool IsLocked { get; set; }
public void Dispose()
{
if (_lock != null)
{
_lock.Dispose();
}
}
}
And usage:
using (FileLock lock = new FileLock(filePath))
{
// Safe in the knowledge that the file is out of harm's way.
}
Related
Hello and thanks for your help.
This time I am having a curious problem with a program (C#) I am writing and would like to hear your advice.
I am writing a normal program (not multithreaded) but then added a timer (System.Timers.Timer)
Also I am using a StreamWriter to write on a file. I open this like this
StreamWriter logStream=new StreamWriter(filename, true);
meaning that if the file exists, it appends , if not it creates.
Later I write in the file like this
logStream.WriteLine(message);
However, I write to the stream from both the main function and from the function that is called by the timer.
the problem symptoms
My program is throwing an error sometimes when I flush or write the stream saying that "Can not access a closed file" and other times "Can not access a closed TextWriter... (What is a "TextWriter"?)
However curiously, the file keeps being written without problem. (Even the "can not access a closed file" message is written in the supposed closed file)
I am not familiar with the inner workings of a Timer. (I suppose it runs a separate thread?)
My question is
Is it possible to use a StreamWriter from several threads? (in this case the main one and the Timer one)
Is it possible that there is happening a race condition or some problem like that?
One more thing: I made a logic mistake and close and reopen the file every time I want to write on it. Yes, it is a mistake and I should correct it. But maybe if I correct this the error I described above will disappear masking a more serious flaw.
My suspicions is that since I am closing and opening the file every time I write on it, maybe the both threads try to access them on a wrong time
Any help will be greatly appreciated
Closing and opening you file under this scenario will create a race condition like you suspect. You cannot keep the stream open and pass the object to the thread because you might end up with a similar issue if you call from different thread. Your best solution remain using a thread safe method that will write what you send to it.
the methods are static because the lock has to be accessible from all instance of the class.
private static ReaderWriterLockSlim readerWriterLockSlim = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
public static void AppendToFile(string path, string text)
{
// Set to locked (other thread will freeze here until object is unlocked
readerWriterLockSlim.EnterWriteLock();
try
{
// Write that will append to the file
using (StreamWriter sw = File.AppendText(path))
{
// append the text
sw.WriteLine(text);
sw.Close();
}
}
finally
{
// Clear the lock
readerWriterLockSlim.ExitWriteLock();
}
}
Is there anyway to wait for this file to open before reading it? The file that is being read will be writing to quite a bit and dont want this error to keep happening. Should I do a while loop with a delay before trying to read it? This is a live stats page so reloading of that page will happen quite a bit.
System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
To test if the file is locked, you can use this function:
protected virtual bool IsFileLocked(string filePath)
{
FileInfo file = new FileInfo(filePath);
FileStream stream = null;
try
{
stream = file.Open(FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None);
}
catch (IOException)
{
//the file is unavailable because it is:
//still being written to
//or being processed by another thread
//or does not exist (has already been processed)
return true;
}
finally
{
if (stream != null)
stream.Close();
}
//file is not locked
return false;
}
Usually it is not good to use exceptions in your normal logic, but in this case you may not have a choice. You could call this every X seconds possibly, to check for locks. An alternative may be to use a file system watcher object to monitor a file. It's hard to say without knowing more about your specific use case.
I have a txt file ABC.txt which will be read and wrote by multi processes. So when one process is reading from or writing to file ABC.txt, file ABC.txt must be locked so that any other processes can not reading from or writing to it. I know the enum System.IO.FileShare may be the right way to handle this problem. But I used another way which I'm not sure if it is right. The following is my solution.
I added another file Lock.txt to the folder. Before I can read from or write to file ABC.txt, I must have the capability to read from file Lock.txt. And after I have read from or written to file ABC.txt, I have to release that capability. The following is the code.
#region Enter the lock
FileStream lockFileStream = null;
bool lockEntered = false;
while (lockEntered == false)
{
try
{
lockFileStream = File.Open("Lock.txt", FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.None);
lockEntered = true;
}
catch (Exception)
{
Thread.Sleep(500);
}
}
#endregion
#region Do the work
// Read from or write to File ABC.txt
// Read from or write to other files
#endregion
#region Release the lock
try
{
if (lockFileStream != null)
{
lockFileStream.Dispose();
}
}
catch
{
}
#endregion
On my computer, it seems that this solution works well, but I still can not make sure if it is appropriate..
Edit: Multi processes, not multi threads in the same process.
C#'s named EventWaitHandle is the way to go here. Create an instance of wait handle in every process which wants to use that file and give it a name which is shared by all such processes.
EventWaitHandle waitHandle = new EventWaitHandle(true, EventResetMode.AutoReset, "SHARED_BY_ALL_PROCESSES");
Then when accessing the file wait on waitHandle and when finished processing file, set it so the next process in the queue may access it.
waitHandle.WaitOne();
/* process file*/
waitHandle.Set();
When you name an event wait handle then that name is shared across all processes in the operating system. Therefore in order to avoid possibility of collisions, use a guid for name ("SHARED_BY_ALL_PROCESSES" above).
A mutex in C# may be shared across multiple processes. Here is an example for multiple processes writing to a single file:
using (var mutex = new Mutex(false, "Strand www.jakemdrew.com"))
{
mutex.WaitOne();
File.AppendAllText(outputFilePath,theFileText);
mutex.ReleaseMutex();
}
You need to make sure that the mutex is given a unique name that will be shared across the entire system.
Additional reading here:
http://www.albahari.com/threading/part2.aspx#_Mutex
Your solution is error prone. You've basically implemented double-checked locking (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking) which can be very unsafe.
A better solution would be to either introduce thread isolation, whereby only one thread ever accesses the file and does so by reading from a queue upon which requests to read or write are placed by other threads (and of course the queue is protected by mutually exclusive access by threads) or where the threads synchronize themselves either by synchronization devices (lock sections, mutices, whatever) or by using some other file access logic (for example, System.IO.FileShare came up in a few reponses here.)
If it was me, I would install something like SQL Server Compact Edition for reading/writing this data.
However, if you want to be able to lock access to a resource that is shared between multiple processes, you need to use a Mutex or a Semaphore.
The Mutex class is a .Net wrapper around an OS Level locking mechanism.
Overview of Synchronization Primitives
I'm using FileSystemWatcher to check when a file is modified or deleted, but I'm wondering if there is any way to check when a file is read by another application.
Example:
I have the file C:\test.txt on my harddrive and am watching it using FileSystemWatcher. Another program (not under my control) goes to read that file; I would like to catch that event and, if possible, check what program is reading the file then modify the contents of the file accordingly.
It sounds like you want to write to your log file when your log file is read externally, or something to that effect. If that is the case, there is a NotifyFilters value, LastAccess. Make sure this is set as one of the flags in your FileSystemWatcher.NotifyFilter property. A change in the last access time will then fire the Changed event on FileSystemWatcher.
Currently, FileSystemWatcher does not allow you to directly differentiate between a read and a change; they both fire the Changed event based on the "change" to LastAccess. So, it would be infeasible to watch for reads to a large number of files. However, you seem to know which file you're watching, so if you had a FileInfo object for that file, and FileSystemWatcher fired its Changed event, you could get a new one and compare LastAccessTime values. If the access time changed, and LastWriteTime didn't, your file is only being read.
Now, in simplest terms, changes you make to the file while it is being read are not going to immediately show up in the other app, nor are you going to be able to "get there first", lock the file and write to it before they see it. So, you cannot use FileSystemWatcher to "intercept" a read request and show the content you want that app to see. The only way the user of another application can see what you just wrote is if the application is also watching the file and re-loads the file. That will fire another Changed event, causing an infinite loop as long as the other application continues to reload the file.
You will also get a Changed event for a read and a write. Opening a file in a text editor (virtually any will do), making some changes, then saving will fire two Changed events if you're looking for changes to Last Access Time. The first one will go off when the file is opened by the editor; at that time, you may not be able to tell that a write will happen, so if you are looking for pure read-only accesses to the file then you're SOL.
The easiest way I can think of to do this would be with a timer (System.Threading.Timer) whose callback checks and stores the last
System.IO.File.GetLastAccessTime(path)
Something like (maybe with a bit more locking...)
public class FileAccessWatcher
{
public Dictionary<string, DateTime> _trackedFiles = new Dictionary<string, DateTime>();
private Timer _timer;
public event EventHandler<EventArgs<string>> FileAccessed = delegate { };
public FileAccessWatcher()
{
_timer = new Timer(OnTimerTick, null, 500, Timeout.Infinite);
}
public void Watch(string path)
{
_trackedFiles[path] = File.GetLastAccessTime(path);
}
public void OnTimerTick(object state)
{
foreach (var pair in _trackedFiles.ToList())
{
var accessed = File.GetLastAccessTime(pair.Key);
if (pair.Value != accessed)
{
_trackedFiles[pair.Key] = accessed;
FileAccessed(this, new EventArgs<string>(pair.Key));
}
}
_timer.Change(500, Timeout.Infinite);
}
}
There is SysInternals' program FileMon... It can trace every file access in the system. If you can find its source, and understand what win32 hooks it uses, you might marshal those functions in C# and get what you want.
You could use FileInfo.LastAccessTime and FileInfo.Refresh() in a polling loop.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.fileinfo_members.aspx
Yes, using file system filter driver you can catch all read requests, analyze them and even substitute the data being read. Development of such driver yourself is possible, but very time-consuming and complicated. We offer a product called CallbackFilter, which includes a ready to use driver and lets you implement your filtering business logic in user-mode.
A little snippet that I found useful for detecting when another process has a lock:
static bool IsFileUsedbyAnotherProcess(string filename)
{
try
{
using(var file = File.Open(filename, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.None))
{
}
}
catch (System.IO.IOException exp)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
I have two ASP.NET web application. One is responsible for processing some info and writing to a log file, and the other application is reponsible for reading the log file and displays the information based on user request.
Here's my code for the Writer
public static void WriteLog(String PathToLogFile, String Message)
{
Mutex FileLock = new Mutex(false, "LogFileMutex");
try
{
FileLock.WaitOne();
using (StreamWriter sw = File.AppendText(FilePath))
{
sw.WriteLine(Message);
sw.Close();
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
LogUtil.WriteToSystemLog(ex);
}
finally
{
FileLock.ReleaseMutex();
}
}
And here's my code for the Reader :
private String ReadLog(String PathToLogFile)
{
FileStream fs = new FileStream(
PathToLogFile, FileMode.Open,
FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite);
StreamReader Reader = new StreamReader(fs);
return Reader.ReadToEnd();
}
My question, is the above code enough to prevent locking in a web garden environemnt?
EDIT 1 : Dirty read is okay.
EDIT 2 : Creating Mutex with new Mutex(false, "LogFileMutex"), closing StreamWriter
Sounds like your trying to implement a basic queue. Why not use a queue that gives you guarenteed availability. You could drop the messages into an MSMQ, then implement a windows service which will read from the queue and push the messages to the DB. If the writting to the DB fails you simply leave the message on the queue (Although you will want to handle posion messages so if it fails cause the data is bad you don't end up in an infinite loop)
This will get rid of all locking concerns and give you guarenteed delivery to your reader...
You should also be disposing of your mutex, as it derives from WaitHandle, and WaitHandle implements IDisposable:
using (Mutex FileLock = new Mutex(true, "LogFileMutex"))
{
// ...
}
Also, perhaps consider a more unique name (a GUID perhaps) than "LogFileMutex", since another unrelated process could possibly use the same name inadvertantly.
Doing this in a web based environment, you are going to have a lot of issues with file locks, can you change this up to use a database instead?
Most hosting solutions are allowing up to 250mb SQL databases.
Not only will a database help with the locking issues, it will also allow you to purge older data more easily, after a wile, that log read is going to get really slow.
No it won't. First, you're creating a brand new mutex with every call so multiple threads are going to access the writing critical section. Second, you don't even use the mutex in the reading critical section so one thread could be attempting to read the file while another is attempting to write. Also, you're not closing the stream in the ReadLog method so once the first read request comes through your app won't be able to write any log entries anyway until garbage collection comes along and closes the stream for you... which could take awhile.