This case is using C# WPF. I want to instantly disable a button after clicking it to prevent clicking it twice in short succession. I disabled the button in OnClick_Event but still clickable.
Part of source is as below.
private void Button_Click_UpdateBurndownChart(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if(threadNotWorking)
{
updateButton.IsEnabled = false;
startWorkThread();
}
}
private void startWorkThread()
{
... ...
//after finish required process
updateButton.IsEnabled = true;
}
Is there any way to accomplish this?
you may want to use a dispatcher, there is probably a threading problem (callback function running on seperate thread and trying to access ui which runs on another thread). try this . .
updateButton.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(
new ThreadStart(() => updateButton.IsEnabled = false),
System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherPriority.Input, null);
instead of
updateButton.IsEnabled = false;
What happens if you were instead to change the order of your events from:
updateButton.IsEnabled = false;
startWorkThread();
To
startWorkThread();
updateButton.IsEnabled = false;
Let me know how this goes.
What it looks like is that you are starting your thread then immediatly enabling your button before your thread has finished. You would be better off using a BackgroundWorker and enable your Button in the RunWorkerCompleted Event. Though you can do something similar by enabling your button using a BeginInvoke at the end of your Process.
public void doWork()
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000); //Simulating your Process
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new System.Threading.ThreadStart(delegate() { updateButton.IsEnabled = true; }), System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherPriority.Background);
}
Example with BackgroundWorker
using System.ComponentModel;
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
BackgroundWorker bgw;
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
bgw = new BackgroundWorker();
bgw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(bgw_DoWork);
bgw.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(bgw_RunWorkerCompleted);
}
void bgw_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
updateButton.IsEnabled = true;
}
void bgw_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000); //Simulating your work
}
private void startWorkThread()
{
bgw.RunWorkerAsync();
}
private void updateButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (bgw.IsBusy != true)
{
updateButton.IsEnabled = false;
startWorkThread();
}
}
}
Related
Unfortunately I was not able to find relevant answer to my problem. I have a object encoder that has an event "VideoEncoding". It passes custom EncodingEventArgs that include various Properties like Progress, Size etc. I can output this info to Console or write to text file. But when I try to utilize it in WinForms I'm not able to pass that information to UI like label or progress bar. I tried different approaches. Background Worker seems like a good idea, The problem is that Background Worker cannot subscribe to VideoEncoding event, neither it will take my custom EventArgs. This is what i was able to put together. Maybe there is a different way to do it using delegates that would communicate with UI. Any suggestions are welcome. Thank you.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private BackgroundWorker bw;
int _progress;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.bw = new BackgroundWorker();
this.bw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(bw_DoWork);
this.bw.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(bw_ProgressChanged);
this.bw.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(bw_RunWorkerCompleted);
this.bw.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
this.button1.Click += new EventHandler(button1_Click);
}
private void bw_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
this.label1.Text = "The job is: " + e.Result.ToString();
this.button1.Enabled = true;
}
private void bw_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.label2.Text = e.ProgressPercentage.ToString() + "% complete";
}
private void bw_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
BackgroundWorker worker = (BackgroundWorker)sender;
this.Encode
worker.ReportProgress(_progress);
e.Result = "Completed";
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (!this.bw.IsBusy)
{
this.bw.RunWorkerAsync();
this.button1.Enabled = false;
}
}
public void Encode()
{
var job = new EncodingJob();
//setup encoding job
//subscribe to an event
ffmpeg.VideoEncoding += GetProgress;
ffmpeg.DoWork(job);
}
public void GetProgress(object sender, EncodingEventArgs e)
{
_progress = (int)e.Progress;
}
}
Try to call the background workers ReportProgress in the GetProgress Method. How should the form know your progress if you don't signalize it?
I have a class SendCountingInfo() and it will send a message to server every 5 minutes. The code inside this class are:
public void StartSendCountingInfo()
{
DoStartSendCountingInfo(300000);
}
private void DoStartSendCountingInfo(int iMiSecs)
{
_pingTimer = new System.Timers.Timer(iMiSecs);
_pingTimer.Elapsed += new System.Timers.ElapsedEventHandler(pingTimer_Elapsed);
_pingTimer.Start();
}
void pingTimer_Elapsed(object sender, System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
PingRemoteHost();
}
When I try to call it in the Windows Form class, it didn't work.
But, when I remove the timer and call PingRemoteHost() directly, it works. However, the form didn't load properly. It shows blank screen but the method PingRemoteHost() work.
Here is the code inside the windows form:
private void Layout_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
tSystemChecker = new System.Timers.Timer(1000);
tSystemChecker.Elapsed += new System.Timers.ElapsedEventHandler(tSystemChecker_Elapsed);
tSystemChecker.Start();
this.WindowState = FormWindowState.Maximized;
}
void tSystemChecker_Elapsed(object sender, System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
UIThreadWork(this, delegate
{
try
{
SuspendLayout();
DoCheckHardwareStatus();
DoCheckLanguage();
SendCountingInfo sci = new SendCountingInfo();
sci.StartSendCountingInfo();
}
catch (Exception exp)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(exp.Message);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(exp.Source);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(exp.StackTrace);
}
ResumeLayout(true);
});
}
Do you have any idea what's wrong?
Use a thread and see if the problem persist
using System.Threading;
//Put this where you want to start the first timer
Thread thread = new Thread(dowork =>
{
public void StartSendCountingInfo();
}
If you are updating the GUI use for your controls
guicontrol.BeginInvoke((MethodInvoker)delegate()
{
guicontrol.Text = "aa";
//etc
});
I've looked in many places for this but still haven't found a solution. What I'm trying to achieve is being able to use BackgroundWorker on a timed basis. Here's an example:
public Main()
{
isDbAvail = new BackgroundWorker();
isDbAvail.DoWork += isOnline;
isDbAvail.RunWorkerCompleted += rewriteOnlineStatus;
}
private void rewriteOnlineStatus(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Subs.Connection connection = new Subs.Connection();
changeStatus(connection.isDbAvail());
}
private void isOnline(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
while (true)
{
Console.WriteLine("Checking database connection");
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(8000);
}
}
public void changeStatus(bool status)
{
if (status)
{
serverStatusVal.Text = "Connected";
serverStatusVal.ForeColor = System.Drawing.Color.DarkGreen;
}
else
{
serverStatusVal.Text = "Not connected";
serverStatusVal.ForeColor = System.Drawing.Color.Red;
}
}
What's happening here is that the isOnline method checks if there is a connection to the database (just an example) every 8 seconds and changes the text accordingly. What I've noticed though, is that the while loop inside the isOnline method causes the rewriteOnlineStatus method never to fire because it runs indefinitely. Is there another workaround to this?
I suggest you use BackgroundWorker.ReportProgress, and check connectivity in the background thread.
Something like this:
public Main()
{
isDbAvail = new BackgroundWorker();
isDbAvail.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
isDbAvail.DoWork += isOnline;
isDbAvail.ProgressChanged += rewriteOnlineStatus;
isDbAvail.RunWorkerAsync();
}
private void rewriteOnlineStatus(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
changeStatus((bool)e.UserState);
}
private void isOnline(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
while (true)
{
Console.WriteLine("Checking database connection");
Subs.Connection connection = new Subs.Connection();
isDbAvail.ReportProgress(0, connection.isDbAvail);
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(8000);
}
}
Now the BackgroundWorker is doing the work, and reporting back to the UI thread via ProgressChanged.
Is it possible to add a callback to a background worker while it is running ?
bw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler( some callback );
bw.RunWorkerAsync();
bw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler( some callback );
Thank you.
Yes you can as it's only a subscription to an event but you can't run bw until he has completed the execution of the first task
here an example to illustrate this the following code will show an InvalidOperationException telling This BackgroundWorker is currently busy and cannot run multiple tasks concurrently."
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
backgroundWorker1.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(backgroundWorker1_DoWork);
backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerAsync();
backgroundWorker1.DoWork+=new DoWorkEventHandler(backgroundWorker2_DoWork);
//at this line you get an InvalidOperationException
backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerAsync();
}
void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
do
{
} while (true);
}
void backgroundWorker2_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
do
{
} while (true);
}
}
As an answer to your comment question
#SriramSakthivel Thanks. Is there a way to put tasks in a queue ?
yes you can if you are using .net 4.0 you can use task with ContinueWith and attach it to your UI
taskScheduler it will have the same behavior as if you are using BackgroundWorker
private void TestButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
TestButton.Enabled = false;
var uiThreadScheduler = TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext();
var backgroundTask = new Task(() =>
{
Thread.Sleep(5000);
});
var uiTask = backgroundTask.ContinueWith(t =>
{
TestButton.Enabled = true;
}, uiThreadScheduler);
backgroundTask.Start();
}
So my main form has a button that I enable when this really long copy process is complete. This copy process happens every 10 min and checks for updates etc. I'm stuck on how to get the process to notify the mainform that it's finished copying. Here's what I have so far:
public partial class mainForm : Form
{
....//initialize some stuff
private void TimerEventProcessor(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
....
copy.GetNewCopy();
}
}
class Copy
{
private bool IsCopyComplete;
....
public void GetNewCopy()
{
Process proc = new Process();
IsCopyComplete = false;
proc.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
proc.Exited += new EventHandler(myProcess_Exited);
proc.Start();
}
private void myProcess_Exited(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
IsCopyComplete = true;
// how to trigger mainform that process is complete?
}
}
You can call Invoke:
private void myProcess_Exited(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
IsCopyComplete = true;
button1.Invoke(new Action(() => button1.Enabled = true));
}
Here's an article on making thread-safe calls to the UI.
There are several ways to create a thread. My favorite, due to its built-in functionality for updating the UI, is the BackgroundWorker Thread. (Though it's not the right tool for every situation).
You could pass a reference of the form to the class, though that usually seems wrong somehow. The class shouldn't be aware of your form's UI components.
What I'd do is create an EventHandler that the Exited event can publish to. (You can attach to multiple events, so if you still need to set IsCopyComplete = true, then just leave that event too.) When the Exited event fires, it'll call the "ProcessExited" EventHandler without knowing whether anything else subscribed to it.
class Copy
{
public event EventHandler ProcessExited;
private bool IsCopyComplete;
....
public void GetNewCopy()
{
Process proc = new Process();
IsCopyComplete = false;
proc.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
proc.Exited += ProcessExited;
proc.Exited += new EventHandler(myProcess_Exited);
proc.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo("cmd.exe"); // specify your process - replace cmd.exe with whatever's appropriate
proc.Start();
}
private void myProcess_Exited(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
IsCopyComplete = true;
}
}
Then in your main form, you can subscribe to the event.
public partial class mainForm : Form
{
....//initialize some stuff
public class mainForm()
{
...
// not sure where you're instantiating `copy` - you may have to move this
copy.ProcessExited += (s, a) =>
button1.Invoke(new Action(() => button1.Enabled = true));
...
}
private void TimerEventProcessor(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
copy.GetNewCopy();
}
}
There are many ways to do this. Here is one
Declare the Handler method in your Mainform and then sunscribe as below
proc.Exited += new EventHandler(MainForm1.myProcess_Exited);