I did some research about this but had no luck finding any solution.
This is a two-aspect problem:
Sharing views between multiple projects. This is easily done by i.e. embedding them in a common project and providing by virtual path provider.
The problem is that they can't be stepped into by a VS debugger, since it has no way of correlating physical cshtml files with these JITted.
Debugging common views. This is the part where I stuck in. I have no idea how to do this.
What I have done:
I created a project with common views (with a "content" type, not emvedded) and a symbolic link in every project, which leads to the appropriate folder. I also added this path to a RazorViewEngine in application_start.
This works fine, I even get a line number when there's an exception thrown in a view, except that VS debugger still can't step into this view :/
In order to debug views one have to have them in a project, but it can't really be done - we obviously use TFS, so they would be multiplied in tfs.
To make the story short: is there any way to step into a shared view while debugging in VS2010?
This is quite a major problem for us, any ideas are appreciated
Related
After importing this existing (and functional) site into Visual studio (tried 2017 and 2019 both) running .Net 4.0 I am getting a plethora of not found errors.
Codebehind pages are not able to see elements on the existing page
Classes are declared to be duplicated or ambiguous
Function names (both standard like Page_Load and custom) are reported as already defined.
I am sure that all these items are related. Here are the steps I followed:
Created new Web Application from Visual Studio 2017 template
Copied solution and csproject files into existing website folder
Added files into the project
Re-added references to site
Set custom class .CS files to Compile
Removed "unnecessary" using statements (which were already declared in web.config)
Create a new ProfileCommon stub referencing ProfileBase
Beyond all this I have tried renaming a number of these functions and classes (using the rename) to create a new reference point.
Not sure what else I can do on this beyond major changes or a complete rewrite (100+ pages of code so far) by creating the new class files then copy/paste.
What other options are open to me?
Ok, this is is a migration project. Only you can "determine" if you want to convert from a web site to a web site application, and the time and efforts for such a migration project.
Now, having stated the above? No question, that I prefer hands down a web site applications. Simple things like have VS compile and build the application, ability to add assemblies (and not have the mess of .dll's HAVING to be in the bin folder to resolve references - yuk!).
And then simple things like the ability to multiple projects in one project are things I come to enjoy, and expect over the years when developing software.
About the "only" thing going for a web site? Your deployment is oh so easy, since you can open a web page, or code behind, hit save, and you are done!
but, this means both source code (code behind) has to be deployed to the web site. As noted, I prefer a build and compile process in VS. This does mean that to make a "minor" change, then you have to do a full re-deploy of the whole site.
However, these benefits I like and enjoy? it not all a given that converting an existing web site to a web site application is worth the efforts. Only you can make this decision. On the other hand, you would not be doing this work unless you KNOW what you doing, and thus can determine if these efforts are worth the time.
Such a conversion and refactoring process is somewhat beyond a simple post on SO.
However some steps and tips are outlined here:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/converting-a-web-site-project-to-a-web-application-project/
I would consider starting over, and try the steps in above.
There is a "convert" option outlined in above, and this can save enormous amounts of time. It has been some time since I have attempted such a conversion, and I not tested the "convert" option in vs2022, and hopefully it still exists.
However, another possible option? Keep the site as web site.
I'm about to start developing a desktop application (WPF) based on a "plugin" architecture, and was going to use MEF (and its DirectoryCatalog) to discover and load plugin assemblies. We're going to be developing many plugins, so it seems sensible to keep them in separate VS solutions rather than bloat the "core" application solution, but having only ever worked on single, standalone solutions, I suspect this is going to make debugging a bit tricky. I'm using VS2013 if that makes a difference.
I'm assuming that I'll still be able to step into a plugin in scenarios where the "core" application calls a method in that plugin? And I'm guessing that once in there, I'll be able to set breakpoints in those source code files that have been "visited"? But what if I want to add a breakpoint to a different source code file - one that hasn't been visited while stepping-through? How can I open that file? In a single solution I could just open it via Solution Explorer, but not (I'm guessing) when it's in a separate assembly.
I'm trying to pre-empt any problems I might have with this multi-solution approach, and wondered if VS had any clever features to simplify some of this stuff. Having separate solutions also means first compiling the plugin solution(s) that I want to test, then compiling and running the "core" application solution. While it's only a couple of extra mouse clicks, are there (again) any VS features that could help here?
This is a common scenario and not tricky at all.
In the project properties of your plug-ins, go to Debug -> Start Action and set Start external program to the executable of your core application.
This way, you only have to compile your core application once (probably using a build script that just builds everything), and debugging a plug-in will start the core application with the debugger attached and you can debug the plug-in (as soon as your core apllication loads the plug-in assembly).
Also keep in mind that you can dettach the debugger from the running application, switch to another instance of Visual Studio with another solution opened, and again attach to your running application. This comes in handy if you e.g. debug your plug-in and want to set or use existing break points in your core application.
As long as Visual Studio is able to find the debugging symbols (the *.pdb files), stepping through the code of e.g. your core application while debugging your plug-in is also no problem.
I see two ways to do this.
The more comfortable option:
1. You can add the external solution to the core solution.
Walkthrough: Adding an existing Visual Studio solution to another solution
By doing this you can organize your solution to reference the code and still keep each plugin solution separate at the same time.
You just reference those plugin solutions from your core solution that you currently want to work on. Also, using this approach you can organize the other solutions just like you would with normal projects and move thembetween virtual solutios folders to your liking until you have the most adequate folder structure.
Quote from the article:
The nice thing about this approach is that not only are all the
projects now in one solution but at any time, you can open the
separate solutions without impacting the "master" solution and vice
versa.
The files in the references solution can be opened and edited just like any other file from your "normal" projects, and of course, you can set breakpoint like in any other code file, too.
This way you can both edityour code and step through it, which I personally find much more convenient than switching and attaching to multiple processes.
2. Add the PDB files.
Put the DLLs with their corresponding PDBs of those plugins you want to debug into a folder and configure your core application to use that folder for the DirectoryCatalog. This enables you to step into the plugin code, but you will not be able to edit them.
#Andrew
Regarding debugging, it shouldn't be an issue as long as you drop the .pdb files with assembly in directory which you are using as DirectoryCatalog.
Regarding building plugin solution before Core- as you have 1 build file for each solution, you should check if you can write msbuild commands in a .bat file to get it executed one after other.
Besides all the above suggestions, another way to debug is to attach your addin solution to the running core process. Attach to Running Processes with the Visual Studio Debugger
I've just come across a pretty strange problem with VS2010 and Script#, which most of the time I am able to re-create.
In my simple scenario I have 2 projects in my solution; a standard Asp.Net MVC2 Web Application, and a Script# jQuery Class Library. I created a static class (attributed with [Imported]) with a static method on it, the intention being that I can map this class in code to an external Javascript library, as described in the documentation.
However, it seems that whenever I decorate such a class with [IgnoreNamespace] to achieve this goal, the project stops successfully compiling but doesn't give me any feedback as to why it's failing (no errors in the error window, for example). It's not easy to get rid of either, as Visual Studio seems to get into a permanent state of not build failure; removing the classes and project files doesn't solve it, nor restarting visual studio. The only way I can get VS to build the project successfully is to delete the project entirely, create a new one then add the files back in, which is annoying to say the least.
With a verbose build output setting, I get the following:
Target "AfterCompile" in file "C:\Program Files (x86)\ScriptSharp\v1.0\ScriptSharp.targets" from project "e:\project\local\ScriptSharpDemo\Scripts\Scripts.csproj" (target "Compile" depends on it):
Task "ScriptCompilerTask"
Done executing task "ScriptCompilerTask" -- FAILED.
Done building target "AfterCompile" in project "Scripts.csproj" -- FAILED.
.. which doesn't tell me whole lot.
There have been a couple of times where I have managed to create this type of class and then successfully build, but mostly I can reproduce this problem pretty reliably.
At this point I'm inclined to think that the bug lies with Script#, but would just like to have that confirmed, and to find a possible work around if there is one.
Just in case anyone is having a similar issue, I've found the cause of the problem.
When adding a class using this method, or copying in a file from another project for use within Script#, this causes a reference to System.dll to be added to the project. This (understandably) causes the project to stop compiling without error.
It would be nice to have a warning about this or for Script# to somehow detect when this situation occurs and/or create a new template for when I use 'Add class' or import a file, but it is just a convenience issue and at least now I can painlessly get my project compiling again just by removing this reference.
When trying to make my project build again, I came across the following, possible solutions:
The "Home\HomePage.cs" and "Shared\Utility.cs" must not be deleted and remain where they wre initially created
The "Home\HomePage.cs" and "Shared\Utility.cs" must be the last entries in the "*.csproj"-file. After them, no "Compile" tag should follow
Problematic calls to "Script.Literal" might cause silent fails - especially be careful when having parameters (like Script.Literal("{0}.doFoo()", variable))
The same seems to be true for "String.Format" when the format parameters are invalid
Namespaces and folders seem to cause many problems, putting all classes into the same namespace and all classes into the same folder might help
I tried all of the suggestions that have been given here, but continued to see the issue. Eventually, I determined that the cause in my situation was that I had added an [IntrinsicProperty] attribute to one of my properties. Removing it solved the issue. Don't ask me why this was causing a problem, but I thought I would share this solution in case others run into it.
I've got a bunch of .dll assemblies, such as HtmlAgilityPack and MoreLinq. Where am I supposed to put these files? I usually toss them somewhere in my Projects folder, but then I'm always digging around for them. Is there a standard place to put them?
There's no standard place to put them, but make sure you:
Put them in one place
Include them in source control.
I put all my required dll's in a top level directory in my solution called "Dependencies", parallel to the project folders. I have them in source control such that when new developers check out the solution, it all compiles and works right off. It's the only way to go.
I include only the .dll files absolutely needed. This keeps it light, which is good, but then when I find some other part of MVC Contrib or whatever that I need, I have to go find the unzipped directory, which might not even be on my computer! Others put entire library directories (readme.txt and all) as part of their source control linked to the solution. This ensures you and future developers will have everything they need, but adds a little dead weight. Either is a good strategy.
Having a "Lib" folder at the same level as source projects is a common way.
To be honest, it's not the dependencies my projects have that I find hard to manage, it's the dependencies the dependencies have. I'd just like to mention NHibernate, Castle Windsor and the various Castle Windsor Facilities in particular. Getting all of those to play together on my last project cost me a lot of time.
For open source projects, I also like to have the source code handy because sometimes its useful to debug into the source code. (And sometimes because the documentation is so poor, you have to read the source code to find out how it works). I've seen VS projects arranged so that the project references the DLL yet at the same time, VS knows where to find the source code, as I write I can't quite remember how to do that.
So, a Lib folder for DLLs works for me; I often call it "Shared Dependencies".
As for open-source source code, I don't have a standard way to version that because each project is structured differently and has a different build process. I don't like to tinker with the open-source project structure or build method because then, I take responsibility for it. If for some reason, it won't build, or builds incorrectly, or produces a faulty DLL, the cause would be exceedingly difficult to track down, and I'd have to get deep into troubleshooting all of that which I dont care about at all.
In a folder UNDER your solution directory, e.g. "external" or "library". That way your continuous integration system (or other team members) can do a pull of one root from your source control system and have everything they need.
In SVN, use svn:externals to pull that directory from a different root so you can easily share library DLLS (and library projects) between solutions.
In the office we have a share on the network for referenced asseblies. These could be 3rd party or assemblies of our own that could be shared between projects.
I also, don't like the idea of putting the dll files in source control. If all the developers have access to the share all will work fine.
The visual studio directory in My Documents seems like a logical place to put them. I don't know if it's the best or anything wrong with it but at least all the libraries are found in one place.
%USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio XXXX\Libraries
At my company we place all our shared DLL assemblies onto a network drive in a folder called Assemblies. From there, we use SyncToy to mirror changes between that folder and a folder on our local development machines (in my case C:\Assemblies with subfolders for different versions or useful third party assemblies). Using the "Reference Paths" feature of Visual Studio projects makes it very easy to select different assembly versions based only on locations.
For projects at home, I would definitely go with the idea mentioned by Jeff M of placing them in the Visual Studio folder under My Documents.
I don't have a hard and fast rule on the location. However, I would encourage consistency!
For example, I needed to to this for a small tool I'm writing for a client at the moment, so I checked their other code bases in Bitbucket which seemed to use a dependencies folder in the solution folder (alongside the other projects), so I copied that.
I have a problem with Spark.
I have compiled assembly with views, located in bin subfolder of website, that i created like below
engine.BatchCompilation(targetFolder, Global.AllKnownDescriptors());
On start of my app, a try to load compiled views:
svf.Engine.LoadBatchCompilation(Assembly.LoadFrom(Path.Combine(basePath, "SharedViews.dll")));
When debugging, i can see that this was successfull.
But ViewEngine doesn't find that views. It even doesn'n look for them in CompiledViewHolder where they are located.
May that problem be caused ny wrong IViewFolder?
Or i should do something more to use compiled views?
Thanks
Not sure if this is helpful, but in the documentation there's the following paragraph:
There is no dynamic recompilation of classes that are loaded in this way and changes to the spark files will have no effect. However the files must be available on disk at runtime. Sorry about that - but the different frameworks still needs to test for the view files' existence to know what view descriptor it should instantiate.
Do you have the view files in your directory structure?
I found out the solution - I compiled views not on app startup, but using different tool. So changes made to engine (registration of entries etc.) during compilation were vain.
So now I compile view on app startup and everything ok.