Solution for IEnumerable.Contains() in entity framework linq queries - c#

I am been using entity framework for my application. Unfortunately I can't make expressions like this one in entity framework:
List<MyUser> users = (from user in database.MyUsers
join app in database.MyApplications
on user.ApplicationId equals app.Id
where app.Name == this._applicationName
&& user.MyRoles.Contains(existingRole)
select user).ToList();
Any other approaches to this one. I don't want to change my database or my models. In my case the relationship between MyUser and MyRole is many to many with a glue table.
This is how the MyUser class is declared:
public partial class MyUser
{
public MyUser()
{
this.MyApiTokens = new HashSet<MyApiToken>();
this.MyLandingPages = new HashSet<MyLandingPage>();
this.MyPresentations = new HashSet<MyPresentation>();
this.MySlides = new HashSet<MySlide>();
this.MyUserSettings = new HashSet<MyUserSetting>();
this.MyRoles = new HashSet<MyRole>();
}
public System.Guid Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
public string EmailAddress { get; set; }
public int ApplicationId { get; set; }
public System.DateTime CreateDate { get; set; }
public System.DateTime LastActivityDate { get; set; }
public System.DateTime LastLockoutDate { get; set; }
public System.DateTime LastLoginDate { get; set; }
public System.DateTime LastPasswordChangedDate { get; set; }
public string PasswordQuestion { get; set; }
public string PasswordAnswer { get; set; }
public string Comment { get; set; }
public bool IsLocked { get; set; }
public bool IsApproved { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MyApiToken> MyApiTokens { get; set; }
public virtual MyApplication MyApplication { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MyLandingPage> MyLandingPages { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MyPresentation> MyPresentations { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MySlide> MySlides { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MyUserSetting> MyUserSettings { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<MyRole> MyRoles { get; set; }
}

Assuming MyRoles is an association property in the entity model (i.e. maps to a table), you may want to make the matching explicit on the primary key of the role object. For example:
user.MyRoles.Any(r => r.RoleId == existingRole.RoleId)
There isn't enough information in your question to give an exact answer, though.

Related

EF core 2.0, OwnsOne in TPH model classes

I have problem when I try to migrate my model in EF Core 2.0.
public class Profile
{
[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public Guid UserId { get; set; }
public ExternalUser User { get; set; }
}
public class OrganizationCustomerProfile : Profile
{
public string CompanyName { get; set; }
public Address LegalAddress { get; set; }
public Address ActualAddress { get; set; }
public BusinessRequisites Requisites { get; set; }
public string President { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ContactPerson> ContactPerson { get; set; }
}
public class PersonCustomerProfile : Profile
{
public FullName Person { get; set; }
public Address Address { get; set; }
public string PhoneNumber { get; set; }
}
public class ContactPerson
{
[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public FullName Person { get; set; }
public string Rank { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public string PhoneNumber { get; set; }
public Guid ProfileId { get; set; }
public Profile Profile { get; set; }
}
Here I want to add complex datatypes Address and BusinessRequisites, which are:
public class BusinessRequisites
{
public string OGRN { get; set; }
public string INN { get; set; }
public string KPPCode { get; set; }
public string SettlementAccount { get; set; }
public string RCBIC { get; set; }
public string CorrespondentAccount { get; set; }
public string BankName { get; set; }
}
public class Address
{
public string FullAddress { get; set; }
public float Latitude { get; set; }
public float Longtitude { get; set; }
}
Code which I use for TPH binding:
public DbSet<Profile> UserProfiles { get; set; }
public DbSet<ContactPerson> ContactPerson { get; set; }
public DbSet<OrganizationCustomerProfile> OrganizationCustomerProfile { get; set; }
...
modelBuilder.Entity<Profile>().HasKey(u => u.Id);
modelBuilder.Entity<OrganizationCustomerProfile>().OwnsOne(e => e.ActualAddress);
modelBuilder.Entity<OrganizationCustomerProfile>().OwnsOne(e => e.LegalAddress);
modelBuilder.Entity<OrganizationCustomerProfile>().OwnsOne(e => e.Requisites);
But when I try to make a migration, I get an error:
"Cannot use table 'UserProfiles' for entity type
'OrganizationCustomerProfile.ActualAddress#Address' since it has a
relationship to a derived entity type 'OrganizationCustomerProfile'.
Either point the relationship to the base type 'Profile' or map
'OrganizationCustomerProfile.ActualAddress#Address' to a different
table."
So, what the reason of this error? Is it not possible to create hierarchy inheritance in EF Core 2.0?
Thank you!
It seems like this isn't supported at the moment:
https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/9888

Code-First SQL Server ASP.NET MVC6

I am a VB.NET programmer, but I am trying to learn C# and MVC in my spare time. I am using ASP.NET MVC 5.1.0.0 and I am trying to do code-First database creation in a local instance of SQL Server.
I was able to get the first database table to update in the database when I ran Update-Database from within the IDE, but when I added a second table that has a PK/FK relationship with the first, I am getting a red line under [ForeignKey] which reads
Does not contain a constructor that takes 1 arguments
I have been searching all over and not getting anywhere. Any suggestions or help would be appreciated. By the way, the first table is a PK/FK relationship to the AspNetUsers table.
public class BuildDatabase : IdentityUser
{
public virtual Companies Companies { get; set; }
public virtual NotaryProfile NotaryProfile { get; set; }
}
public class Companies
{
[Key]
[Column("CompanyID")] // Did this as the database will reflect TableName_ColumnName instead.
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
public string CompanyName { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public bool IsNotary { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<NotaryProfile> NotaryProfile { get; set; }
}
public class NotaryProfile
{
[Key]
public int NotaryID { get; set; }
public string NamePrefix { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string MiddleInitial { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string NameSuffix { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public int DefaultState { get; set; }
public int DefaultCounty { get; set; }
public bool IsSigningAgent { get; set; }
public bool HasABond { get; set; }
public decimal BondAmount { get; set; }
public bool HasEandO { get; set; }
public decimal EandOAmount { get; set; }
public bool ElectronicNotarizationsAllowed { get; set; }
public string ElectronicTechnologyUsed { get; set; }
public string ComissionNumber { get; set; }
public DateTime CommissionIssued { get; set; }
public DateTime CommssionOriginal { get; set; }
public DateTime CommissionExpires { get; set; }
public DateTime CommissionFiledOn { get; set; }
public string SOSAuditNumber { get; set; }
public string CommissionDesc { get; set; }
[Foreignkey("CompanyID")] // Companies.CompanyID = PK
public int CompanyID { get; set; } // PK/FK relationship.
public Companies Companies { get; set; } // Reference to Companies table above.
}
public class SchemaDBContext : IdentityDbContext<BuildDatabase>
{
public SchemaDBContext()
: base("DefaultConnection"){}
public DbSet<Companies> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<NotaryProfile> NotaryProfile { get; set; }
}
One of your classes (probably NotaryProfile) needs to reference another object (the foreign key relationship) but there is no constructor in that class that accepts an argument to establish that relationship, e.g.:
public NotaryProfile(int companyId) {
this.companyId = companyId;
}
BTW, a better way to establish that relationship is to use the actual class type rather than the ID, as in:
public class NotaryProfile {
...
public Company Company { get; set; }
// Instead of this:
// public int CompanyID { get; set; } // PK/FK relationship.
...
}
See also:
C# “does not contain a constructor that takes '1' arguments”
Does not contain a constructor that takes 2 arguments

Mapping complex DTOs to entities with automapper

I want to map from
LDTTicketUploadDTO[] to IEnumerable<LDTTicket>
The mappings are created in this method and at the end I map the data.
public void UploadLDTTickets(LDTTicketUploadDTO[] ticketDTOs)
{
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTTicketUploadDTO, LDTTicket>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTTicketDTO, LDTTicket>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTCustomerDTO, LDTCustomer>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTDeviceDTO, LDTDevice>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTUnitDTO, LDTUnit>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTCommandDTO, LDTCommand>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTCommandParameterDTO, LDTCommandParameter>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTObjectDTO, LDTObject>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTControlFileDTO, LDTControlFile>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTDeviceDTO, LDTDevice>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTLanguageDTO, LDTLanguage>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTObjectBitDTO, LDTObjectBit>();
var tickets = Mapper.Map<IEnumerable<LDTTicketUploadDTO>, IEnumerable<LDTTicket>>(ticketDTOs);
// do something with tickets
}
This is how the DTO´s are structured:
public class LDTTicketUploadDTO
{
public LDTTicketDTO Ticket { get; set; }
public LDTDeviceDTO Device { get; set; }
public LDTCustomerDTO Customer { get; set; }
}
public enum TicketStatus
{
New,
InProgress,
Done
}
public class LDTTicketDTO
{
public bool UploadNeeded { get; set; }
public string TicketNumber { get; set; }
public TicketStatus Status { get; set; }
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
public string AssignedTo { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<LDTUnitDTO> Units { get; set; }
}
public class LDTUnitDTO
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FunctionUnit { get; set; }
public int FunctionUnitAddress { get; set; }
public string Zone { get; set; }
public int ZoneUnitAddress { get; set; }
public string Object { get; set; }
public int ObjectAddress { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<LDTCommandDTO> Commands { get; set; }
}
and more...
What works is that these properties are correctly mapped to their counterpart entities:
public LDTDeviceDTO Device { get; set; }
public LDTCustomerDTO Customer { get; set; }
What works NOT is that this property is not mapped:
public LDTTicketDTO Ticket { get; set; }
This is how the Entities are structured:
public class LDTTicket
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
[Required]
public string SerialNumber { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
[Required]
public string TicketNumber { get; set; }
[Required]
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
[Required]
public string AssignedTo { get; set; }
public TicketStatus Status { get; set; }
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public bool UploadNeeded { get; set; }
public virtual LDTCustomer Customer { get; set; }
public virtual LDTDevice Device { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<LDTUnit> Units { get; set; }
}
ONLY the Customer and Device property are mapped in the LDTTicket
What is wrong with my configuration?
It's expecting to populate a LDTTicket sub-property on the ticket, not the matching properties of the ticket itself. Create direct mappings onto the ticket from the Ticket subproperty of the source directly onto the matching properties of the destination. NOTE: You only need to define your mappings once, not per method execution. Mappings should be defined at app start up and thereafter used.
public void UploadLDTTickets(LDTTicketUploadDTO[] ticketDTOs)
{
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTTicketUploadDTO, LDTTicket>();
.ForMember(d => d.SerialNumber, m => m.MapFrom(s => s.Ticket.SerialNumber))
...
//Mapper.CreateMap<LDTTicketDTO, LDTTicket>(); You don't need this
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTCustomerDTO, LDTCustomer>();
Mapper.CreateMap<LDTDeviceDTO, LDTDevice>();
...
}

Entity Framework How to generate PrimaryKey by mask

I need to generate a primary key by mask (for example: BS{100-999}-{Rand(100-999)}) But I do not know how to generate a key like this in EF code/ Could somebody help me please to figure this out?
My model:
[Table("Tickets")]
public class Ticket
{
public Ticket()
{
CreationDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
LastChangeDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
UserReviewed = true;
EmailAlert = true;
}
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema.DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public Guid Id { get; set; } //now it is Guid But i need this to be string and generated by the above mask
public string UsersName { get; set; }
public string Theme { get; set; }
public string Request { get; set; }
public DateTime CreationDate { get; set; }
public string TypeMask { get; set; }
public string StatusMask { get; set; }
public int SenderId { get; set; }
public bool EmailAlert { get; set; }
public DateTime LastChangeDate { get; set; }
public bool UserReviewed { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<TicketRecord> Answers { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("StatusMask")]
public virtual TicketStatus Status { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("TypeMask")]
public virtual TicketType Type { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("SenderId")]
public virtual UserProfile Sender { get; set; }
public virtual AttachmentsCollection IncludedFiles { get; set; }
}
EF never generates keys. Either you need to generate the key by yourself or you let the EF know that the key will be generated by the database using StoreGeneragedPattern annotation/setting. EF cannot generate keys as it cannot guarantee uniquenesses for the generated values.

Error with Entity Framework 4 and MVC 3

I have a database with 3 tables:
Subjects
Members
Topics
Then I added the connection string to web.config and created an EF with the following classes:
namespace MySite.Models
{
public class MySiteDBModel : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Topic> Topics { get; set; }
public DbSet<Subject> Subjects { get; set; }
public DbSet<Member> Members { get; set; }
public DbSet<TopicDataModel> TopicDataModel { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder mb)
{
mb.Conventions.Remove<PluralizingTableNameConvention>();
}
}
public class Topic
{
[Key]
public int TopicID { get; set; }
public int SubID { get; set; }
public int MemberID { get; set; }
public string TDate { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string FileName { get; set; }
public int Displays { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public virtual Subject Subject { get; set; }
public virtual Member Member { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<TopicView> TopicView { get; set; }
}
public class Subject
{
[Key]
public int SubID { get; set; }
public string SubName { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Topic> Topic { get; set; }
}
public class Member
{
[Key]
public int MemberID { get; set; }
public string FLName { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public string Pwd { get; set; }
public string About { get; set; }
public string Photo { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Topic> Topic { get; set; }
}
public class TopicDataModel
{
[Key]
public int TopicID { get; set; }
public string SubName { get; set; }
public string FLName { get; set; }
public string TDate { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public int Displays { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
}
Now when I am trying to query the database with the this code:
public ActionResult Index()
{
var topics = from t in db.Topics
join s in db.Subjects on t.SubID equals s.SubID
join m in db.Members on t.MemberID equals m.MemberID
select new TopicDataModel()
{
TopicID = t.TopicID,
SubName = s.SubName,
FLName = m.FLName,
TDate = t.TDate,
Title = t.Title,
Displays = t.Displays,
Description = t.Description
};
return View(topics.ToList());
}
I got this Error:
The model backing the 'MySiteDBModel' context has changed since the
database was created. Either manually delete/update the database, or
call Database.SetInitializer with an IDatabaseInitializer instance.
For example, the DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges strategy will
automatically delete and recreate the database, and optionally seed it
with new data.
Please help me!!!!!!
You need to set some controls on how EF is handling changes to your data model. Julie Lerman has a good blog post on Turning Off Code First Database Initialization Completely.
Also, here is a good overview - Inside Code First Database Initialization

Categories