Question:
What is a fast way to scale and/or crop a bitmap provided from a WritableBitmap for display in the UI?
Requirements:
Have Low CPU usage
Handle large images (5 Megapixel, abt 2500x2000 pixels)
Resize and/or crop to the same resolution/area as the UI element the bitmap is displayed in.
Use WPF
Specifically, it must allow a 14FPS 5 Megapixel camera image stream to be displayed in a WPF UI element at full speed.
Update:
I have been able to speed up the drawing quite a bit by painting to a Canvas control using an ImageBrush as follows, where m_bitmap is my WriteableBitmap:
ImageBrush brush = new ImageBrush();
brush.ImageSource = m_bitmap;
brush.Stretch = Stretch.Uniform;
canvas.Background = brush;
I'm now able to get the full 14FPS, though it still using about 20% CPU, so I'm not sure how well it preform if I add another camera or two (the plan is to have 4 or so running).
Another thing I think might be slowing down the drawing is the images are in a mono, Gray8, format, not the standard RGB32 (or is it bgra32 for WPF?) format. If I understand correctly, the image has to be converted to the standard format to be displayed, which would add significant overhead to each frame's drawing time.
Some background:
I'm currently working with a 5 Megapixel, 14 FPS, video camera and am trying to get the frames to render to the screen at full speed. I would like to do this using WPF.
I currently have an example in WinForms that runs full speed for an unscaled image, but (as I would expect) it has major trouble if I set the pictureBox.SizeMode = Zoom;. The example reads raw data directly from the camera stream to a buffer and then copies the data from the buffer into the bitmap set to the PictureBox control. The copy algorithm uses LockBits to speed things up.
I converted that example into WPF, rewriting the parts using Bitmap objects to instead use WritableBitmap objects and an Image control instead of PictureBox. Unforunately this is not able to render the stream to the screen at any decent rate, scaled or unscaled. Both have significant CPU load and very slow updates.
The performance when rendering to the screen is turned off is great. It is able to process the image stream at full speed and resolution while using around 3% CPU and less than 100MB memory.
Note: when I say rendering to the screen is turned off, the WritableBitmap is still being continuously updated, only is not set to the Image control.
I've seen a lot of discussion about getting fast bitmap updating in WPF, but have been unsuccessful in getting it to work at an reasonable speed/cpu load. Also I would like to have the image scaled in such a way that I can see the whole image.
I imagine the key will lie in some sort of scaling/crop combination that needs to be done so that WPF will not try to render(cache?) all 5 million pixels, but only those on the screen, and only at the current screen resolution. I imagine/hope this can be done fairly easily and without too much hit to memory or CPU, but currently have no idea how to do so. I have found the DecodePixelWidth and DecodePixelHeight properties, but those are only applicable when loading an image from a file to a BitmapImage.
Did you have a look at the following post?
Resizing WritableBitmap
If it does not solve your problem, I have more questions for you:
What is the resolution of your image?
Is the size of you UI element constant? What's its size?
Edit:
After your edit, I noticed that you want to display a BitmapImage in Gray8 PixelFormat, why don't you try to set this property when creating your BitmapImage (m_bitmap)?
m_bitmap.Format = PixelFormat.Gray8; // could not test
I am certain that taking your 8 bits/pixel and multiplying the amount of bits needed per pixel by 4 while not gaining any quality is slowing down your application. Especially because you run operations on 32 bits per pixel images when you could be running those operations on 8 bits per pixel images.
While its interface is a bit old-fashioned, I believe that convert (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageMagick) is very often used (and may in fact be the industry standard).
Edit: StackOverflow has about 2,300 question tagged with imagemagick here. See for example What is the difference for sample/resample/scale/resize/adaptive-resize/thumbnail operators in ImageMagick convert?
The OP for https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/41531 decided to go with ImageMagick. And the accepted answer to Efficient JPEG Image Resizing in PHP also suggests ImageMagick, with 19 votes.
However, I don't know whether ImageMagick is capable of meeting your requirements of 14FPS, 5 Megapixels.
The only answer to Recommendation for real time image processing tools on Linux suggests a fork graphicsmagick, which seems to also be available for Windows.
Related
Im trying to create a little game with C# and GDI+. For learning purposes I'm trying to avoid as much frameworks etc. as possible. So I have some specific questions to GDI+
Is it possible to fill a region object in GDI with an image?
-If not, is there a manual way for it?
Can you read and set single pixels in a graphics object (not a bitmap)?
Have you got any tips for me to increase overall performance in GDI?
Thanks for any help
Is it possible to fill a region object in GDI with an image?
A region can't be filled, it doesn't store pixels. What you are almost certainly looking for here is the Graphics.Clip property. Assign the region to it and draw the image, it will be clipped by the region.
Can you read and set single pixels in a graphics object (not a bitmap)?
No, the Graphics object doesn't store any pixels itself, it only keeps track of where you draw to. The "device context" in Windows speak. Which can be a bitmap, the screen, a printer, a metafile. Not all of these device contexts let you read a pixel back after drawing (not a printer and not a metafile for example). But no problem of course when you draw to a bitmap.
Have you got any tips for me to increase overall performance in GDI?
There is one crucial one, .NET makes it very easy to overlook. The pixel format of the bitmap you draw to is super-duper important. The most expensive thing you'll ever do with a bitmap is copying it, from CPU memory to the video-adapter's memory. That copy is only fast if the format of the pixels exactly match the format the video-adapter uses. On all modern machines that's PixelFormat.Format32bppPArgb. The difference is huge, it is ten times faster than all the other ones.
Many answers that will detail these points:
Once you have a Region it will limit where pixels are drawn. Use Graphics.DrawImage then
No way to read and only a perverted way to set a Pixel by Graphics.FillRectangle(br, x,y,1,1); The reason behind this is probably that Graphics can not only operate in a Pixel mode but also with various other Units from points to inches and mm..
Use Lockbits. Just one example using one Bitmap. Other common jobs demand locking two (one input one output) or or even three (two inputs and one calculated output) bitmaps..
Know what you invalidate, often only a small part really needs it..
Learn about ImageList, it can't do much but is useful for what it does, that is cache images of one size and color depth
Learn when to use a Panel and when a Picturebox
I am writing a program (c# .NET 4.0 WPF 3D) that renders earth slices (like OpendTect's or Petrel's seismics module).
The problem is that I need to be able to zoom in deeply, and still see the details.
I tried putting a huge detailed texture (5000x5000), but it eats too much memory (200-300 MB), and crashes when I try to increase the size.
Now I want to see if there is any way of using something like a dynamic texture - the one that will change depending on distance to the camera.
Or maybe there is some other way of dealing with high-resolution surfaces?
I use this code to load texture:
wbm = new WriteableBitmap(
(int)1306*scale,
(int)ns*scale,
96,
96,
PixelFormats.Indexed8,
new BitmapPalette(getColors()));
...
visual3d.Material = visual3d.BackMaterial
= new DiffuseMaterial(new ImageBrush(wbm));
You have several options here:
Optimize current solution. 5000 * 5000 * 4 is around 100 MB. How do you load and show the texture? I have an app that renders up to 1100 3d objects and uses 300MB of memory and the performance is good enough. I strongly advice you to run a profiler, not only for pure performance reasons, but it helps to catch bugs! I my WPF 3D, thanks to the profiler I found that I was doing useless tessellation.
Create one low resolution image of whole texture and a few small high resolution images which are parts of the texture. If the user clicks/zooms-in you will load small high resolution image that will fit viewport. Similar effect to google maps.
Use XNA. You can host XNA inside WPF and use DXT texture. I'm not sure, but WPF doesn't support that texture formant directly.
I want to make a control that acts as a time ruler with a wave form for sound wav files like that in movie maker or in camtasia studio video editor
i have a method to parse the sound wav file
i have a method to draw the wave of a specified time period
the problem is that the duration is long how to render all of it??one time or when the user is scrolling to a point if it isn't rendered I'll render it? what after its all rendered ? it will be so long user will zoom in and so on how to do it without effecting the performance
If you're dealing with a big image and lots of data I would sugest this:
render/display what user is currently looking at
render rest of if in a background thread into a memory image
Once you have the whole image rendered in an image kept in memory, any scrolling and/or zooming would be just to position your display window.
Render your image in an unzoomed scale into a Bitmap object. When you need to display part of if use Bitmap.Clone to copy section of that bitmap into a picture displayed to user. A bit difficult part will be to render part of your base Bitmap which is currently demanded to be viewed.
This could be memory demanding. It is effectively a caching mechanism and as always in cases like that you get speed by using more memory.
Something similar to how google maps works.
We do not know how you are rendering your graphic, but I presume you are using unsafe lockbits to generate directly into a bitmap. As Maciej says, just render the part you need to display - when zoomed, either render again (should be fast). You can preempt by rendering current, zoom in 1, zoom out 1, left 1/2 a screen, right 1/2 screen etc in the background, but then you need to manage these (they can be rendered in parallel of course using background worker threads). The key to memory is to keep the bitmaps to a minimum (you have the algorithm of the graph and the renderer) and the key to speed is to keep it low level and prefetch what you can and parallelism.
My application is used to design airports for a flight simulator. Users can add one or more images as background. The image(s) can be sized accurately and then used as a template to lay down features such as runways, aprons and so on.
I use a third party graphics library (Piccolo) which has an image class (as far as I can see it is a simple wrapper for System.Drawing.Image).
So far I have done little except allow the user to add an image, size it and so on. It will be no surprise that users sometimes complain of poor performance. We tell them not to load large images (up to 100k seem OK) but don't stop them and 100Mb bitmaps have been used with horrible results.
I need to fix this in a couple of ways. First by converting any image they use to an efficient format (size vs definition) and second by ensuring that the loaded image is suitably sized for the dimensions - at the moment I don't do anything specific to deal with the resizing of say a 2000 x 2000 image to fit a 500 x 500 area of the display.
The default 1:1 display of the application represents 1m per pixel. Once the user has resized the image to fit accurately would I be right in thinking that the best resoultion for the image would be to resample it to that size? I am aware that if the user zooms in way past 1:1 which they will probably do then the clarity of the image will fall.
My ignorance of handling images is complete. I have looked at some image manipulation libraries (ImageMagick and the free version of dotIamge) first for converting the input image to a standard one and second for resizing -resampling. The truth is that they do far more than I need.
Any pointer much appreciated.
Yes, resampling so that the bitmap doesn't constantly have to be rescaled for every paint should make a big difference. The default Graphics.InterpolationMode makes pretty images but is not cheap.
Another biggie is the pixel format of the bitmap. Format32bppPArgb is 10 times faster than any of the others on most video adapters.
private static Bitmap Resample(Image img, Size size) {
var bmp = new Bitmap(size.Width, size.Height, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppPArgb);
using (var gr = Graphics.FromImage(bmp)) {
gr.DrawImage(img, new Rectangle(Point.Empty, size));
}
return bmp;
}
I am creating a custom control using C# GDI+.
Quick explanation...the control will be say 500 pixels on screen but will contain perhaps 500000 pixels of information. So although i'm only showing 500px at a time i need to obviously scroll in the horizontal plane (left & right). The tricky part is that each 500px chunk of bitmap takes a while (between 100ms - 1000ms) to render.
So my plan is to maintain a 1500px bitmap in memory. i.e. the 500px visible part and 500px either side of the visible area and draw the off-screen parts asynchronously as the user scrolls.
I would like some feedback, advice, criticism or examples of code to help me achieve this. It seems fairly straight forward but after a few initial test attempts its proving more difficult than one would imagine.
Thanks.
The effectiveness of this approach depends on, amongst other things, the amount of moving around the user will do. If the user is making small movement, then stopping to consider the new information, this could work. However, if the user is whizzing back and forth, you'll still have an issue.
Does your application lend itself to gradually improving the quality of the image - i.e. providing a quick usable image and then improving it as the user stops to consider it?
I had a similar problem a few years back. As dommer mentions, if you're processing chunks of the image before displaying them you're best off showing something and improving it later. If you're having problems blitting the original image, you've got something wrong with your method. GDI+ is very particular about pixel depth (you want 32bpp with alpha).
In our case, we processed in 500px tiles and padded out a tile around the visible view Ff the user scrolled outside the area we'd processed we blitted bits of the original image with a dark semi-opaque rectangle super-imposed on them. These chunks were queued for processing. As we processed chunks of the image (centre-out) they semi-opaque rectangles would disappear.
It worked reasonably well, was very responsive and very fast. It's very fast to blit the original bitmap onto the screen, and in our case the processing was usually very close behind. The effect of the tiles getting lighter was actually quite pretty.
Draw only the visible area.
Build a method
Bitmap DrawGraph(leftMargin, rightMargin) {...}
and then in OnPaint() do
Bitmap bmp = new Bitmap(e.ClipRectangle.Width, e.ClipRectangle.Height);
bmp = DrawGraph(e.ClipRectangle.Left, e.ClipRectangle.Right);
e.Graphics.DrawImageUnscaled(bmp, e.ClipRectangle.Location);