Related
I have a byte array as follows -
byte[] arrByt = new byte[] { 0xF, 0xF, 0x11, 0x4 };
so in binary
arrByt = 00001111 00001111 00010001 000000100
Now I want to create a new byte array by removing leading 0s for each byte from arrByt
arrNewByt = 11111111 10001100 = { 0xFF, 0x8C };
I know that this can be done by converting the byte values into binary string values, removing the leading 0s, appending the values and converting back to byte values into the new array.
However this is a slow process for a large array.
Is there a faster way to achieve this (like logical operations, bit operations, or other efficient ways)?
Thanks.
This should do the job quite fast. At least only standard loops and operators. Give it a try, will also work for longer source arrays.
// source array of bytes
var arrByt = new byte[] {0xF, 0xF, 0x11, 0x4 };
// target array - first with the size of the source array
var targetArray = new byte[arrByt.Length];
// bit index in target array
// from left = byte 0, bit 7 = index 31; to the right = byte 4, bit 0 = index 0
var targetIdx = targetArray.Length * 8 - 1;
// go through all bytes of the source array from left to right
for (var i = 0; i < arrByt.Length; i++)
{
var startFound = false;
// go through all bits of the current byte from the highest to the lowest
for (var x = 7; x >= 0; x--)
{
// copy the bit if it is 1 or if there was already a 1 before in this byte
if (startFound || ((arrByt[i] >> x) & 1) == 1)
{
startFound = true;
// copy the bit from its position in the source array to its new position in the target array
targetArray[targetArray.Length - ((targetIdx / 8) + 1)] |= (byte) (((arrByt[i] >> x) & 1) << (targetIdx % 8));
// advance the bit + byte position in the target array one to the right
targetIdx--;
}
}
}
// resize the target array to only the bytes that were used above
Array.Resize(ref targetArray, (int)Math.Ceiling((targetArray.Length * 8 - (targetIdx + 1)) / 8d));
// write target array content to console
for (var i = 0; i < targetArray.Length; i++)
{
Console.Write($"{targetArray[i]:X} ");
}
// OUTPUT: FF 8C
If you are trying to find the location of the most-significant bit, you can do a log2() of the byte (and if you don't have log2, you can use log(x)/log(2) which is the same as log2(x))
For instance, the number 7, 6, 5, and 4 all have a '1' in the 3rd bit position (0111, 0110, 0101, 0100). The log2() of them are all between 2 and 2.8. Same thing happens for anything in the 4th bit, it will be a number between 3 and 3.9. So you can find out the Most Significant Bit by adding 1 to the log2() of the number (round down).
floor(log2(00001111)) + 1 == floor(3.9) + 1 == 3 + 1 == 4
You know how many bits are in a byte, so you can easily know the number of bits to shift left:
int numToShift = 8 - floor(log2(bytearray[0])) + 1;
shiftedValue = bytearray[0] << numToShift;
From there, it's just a matter of keeping track of how many outstanding bits (not pushed into a bytearray yet) you have, and then pushing some/all of them on.
The above code would only work for the first byte array. If you put this in a loop, the numToShift would maybe need to keep track of the latest empty slot to shift things into (you might have to shift right to fit in current byte array, and then use the leftovers to put into the start of the next byte array). So instead of doing "8 -" in the above code, you would maybe put the starting location. For instance, if only 3 bits were left to fill in the current byte array, you would do:
int numToShift = 3 - floor(log2(bytearray[0])) + 1;
So that number should be a variable:
int numToShift = bitsAvailableInCurrentByte - floor(log2(bytearray[0])) + 1;
Please check this code snippet. This might help you.
byte[] arrByt = new byte[] { 0xF, 0xF, 0x11, 0x4 };
byte[] result = new byte[arrByt.Length / 2];
var en = arrByt.GetEnumerator();
int count = 0;
byte result1 = 0;
int index = 0;
while (en.MoveNext())
{
count++;
byte item = (byte)en.Current;
if (count == 1)
{
while (item < 128)
{
item = (byte)(item << 1);
}
result1 ^= item;
}
if (count == 2)
{
count = 0;
result1 ^= item;
result[index] = result1;
index++;
result1 = 0;
}
}
foreach (var s in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(s.ToString("X"));
}
I'm trying to convert int to short and then to byte[] but I'm getting wrong values, i pass in 1 and get 256 what am i doing wrong?
this is the code:
//passing 1
int i = 1;
byte[] shortBytes = ShortAsByte((short)i);
//ii is 256
short ii = Connection.BytesToShort (shortBytes [0], shortBytes [1]);
public static byte[] ShortAsByte(short shortValue){
byte[] intBytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(shortValue);
if (BitConverter.IsLittleEndian) Array.Reverse(intBytes);
return intBytes;
}
public static short BytesToShort(byte byte1, byte byte2)
{
return (short)((byte2 << 8) + byte1);
}
The method ShortAsByte has the most significant bit at index 0 and the least significant at index 1, so the BytesToShort method is shifting a 1 instead of a 0. This means BytesToShort returns 256 (1 << 8 + 0 = 256) instead of 1 (0 << 8 + 1 = 1) .
Swap the byte variables in the return statement to get the correct result.
public static short BytesToShort(byte byte1, byte byte2)
{
return (short)((byte1 << 8) + byte2);
}
Also, props to you for taking endian-ness into consideration!
In C#, how would I go about setting 2 bytes where the first 10 bits represent one decimal value and the next 6 represent a different decimal value?
So if the first value was '8' (first 10 bits) and the second '2' (remaining 6 bits), I need to end up with '0000001000 000010' inside a byte array.
Thanks!
Ad
UInt16 val1 = 8;
UInt16 val2 = 2;
UInt16 combined = (UInt16)((val1 << 6) | val2);
If you need it in a byte array, you can pass the result to the BitConverter.GetBytes method.
byte[] array = BitConverter.GetBytes(combined);
int val1 = 8;
int val2 = 2;
// First byte contains all but the 2 least significant bits from the first value.
byte byte1 = (byte)(val1 >> 2);
// Second byte contains the 2 least significant bits from the first value,
// shifted 6 bits left to become the 2 most significant bits of the byte,
// followed by the (at most 6) bits of the second value.
byte byte2 = (byte)((val1 & 4) << 6 | val2);
byte[] bytes = new byte[] { byte1, byte2 };
// Just for verification.
string s =
Convert.ToString(byte1, 2).PadLeft(8, '0') + " " +
Convert.ToString(byte2, 2).PadLeft(8, '0');
Not accounting for any kind of overflow:
private static byte[] amend(int a, int b)
{
// Combine the datum into a 16 bits integer
var c = (ushort) ((a << 6) | (b));
// Fragment the Int to bytes
var ret = new byte[2];
ret[0] = (byte) (c >> 8);
ret[1] = (byte) (c);
return ret;
}
ushort value = (8 << 6) | 2;
byte[] bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(value);
I am making application in C# which has a byte array containing hex values.
I am getting data as a big-endian but I want it as a little-endian and I am using Bitconverter.toInt32 method for converting that value to integer.
My problem is that before converting the value, I have to copy that 4 byte data into temporary array from source byte array and then reverse that temporary byte array.
I can't reverse source array because it also contains other data.
Because of that my application becomes slow.
In the code I have one source array of byte as waveData[] which contains a lot of data.
byte[] tempForTimestamp=new byte[4];
tempForTimestamp[0] = waveData[290];
tempForTimestamp[1] = waveData[289];
tempForTimestamp[2] = waveData[288];
tempForTimestamp[3] = waveData[287];
int number = BitConverter.ToInt32(tempForTimestamp, 0);
Is there any other method for that conversion?
Add a reference to System.Memory nuget and use BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness().
using System.Buffers.Binary;
number = BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness(number);
It supports both signed and unsigned integers (byte/short/int/long).
In modern-day Linq the one-liner and easiest to understand version would be:
int number = BitConverter.ToInt32(waveData.Skip(286).Take(4).Reverse().ToArray(), 0);
You could also...
byte[] tempForTimestamp = new byte[4];
Array.Copy(waveData, 287, tempForTimestamp, 0, 4);
Array.Reverse(tempForTimestamp);
int number = BitConverter.ToInt32(tempForTimestamp);
:)
If you know the data is big-endian, perhaps just do it manually:
int value = (buffer[i++] << 24) | (buffer[i++] << 16)
| (buffer[i++] << 8) | buffer[i++];
this will work reliably on any CPU, too. Note i is your current offset into the buffer.
Another approach would be to shuffle the array:
byte tmp = buffer[i+3];
buffer[i+3] = buffer[i];
buffer[i] = tmp;
tmp = buffer[i+2];
buffer[i+2] = buffer[i+1];
buffer[i+1] = tmp;
int value = BitConverter.ToInt32(buffer, i);
i += 4;
I find the first immensely more readable, and there are no branches / complex code, so it should work pretty fast too. The second could also run into problems on some platforms (where the CPU is already running big-endian).
Here you go
public static int SwapEndianness(int value)
{
var b1 = (value >> 0) & 0xff;
var b2 = (value >> 8) & 0xff;
var b3 = (value >> 16) & 0xff;
var b4 = (value >> 24) & 0xff;
return b1 << 24 | b2 << 16 | b3 << 8 | b4 << 0;
}
Declare this class:
using static System.Net.IPAddress;
namespace BigEndianExtension
{
public static class BigEndian
{
public static short ToBigEndian(this short value) => HostToNetworkOrder(value);
public static int ToBigEndian(this int value) => HostToNetworkOrder(value);
public static long ToBigEndian(this long value) => HostToNetworkOrder(value);
public static short FromBigEndian(this short value) => NetworkToHostOrder(value);
public static int FromBigEndian(this int value) => NetworkToHostOrder(value);
public static long FromBigEndian(this long value) => NetworkToHostOrder(value);
}
}
Example, create a form with a button and a multiline textbox:
using BigEndianExtension;
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
short int16 = 0x1234;
int int32 = 0x12345678;
long int64 = 0x123456789abcdef0;
string text = string.Format("LE:{0:X4}\r\nBE:{1:X4}\r\n", int16, int16.ToBigEndian());
text += string.Format("LE:{0:X8}\r\nBE:{1:X8}\r\n", int32, int32.ToBigEndian());
text += string.Format("LE:{0:X16}\r\nBE:{1:X16}\r\n", int64, int64.ToBigEndian());
textBox1.Text = text;
}
//Some code...
The most straightforward way is to use the BinaryPrimitives.ReadInt32BigEndian(ReadOnlySpan) Method introduced in .NET Standard 2.1
var number = BinaryPrimitives.ReadInt32BigEndian(waveData[297..291]);
If you won't ever again need that reversed, temporary array, you could just create it as you pass the parameter, instead of making four assignments. For example:
int i = 287;
int value = BitConverter.ToInt32({
waveData(i + 3),
waveData(i + 2),
waveData(i + 1),
waveData(i)
}, 0);
I use the following helper functions
public static Int16 ToInt16(byte[] data, int offset)
{
if (BitConverter.IsLittleEndian)
return BitConverter.ToInt16(BitConverter.IsLittleEndian ? data.Skip(offset).Take(2).Reverse().ToArray() : data, 0);
return BitConverter.ToInt16(data, offset);
}
public static Int32 ToInt32(byte[] data, int offset)
{
if (BitConverter.IsLittleEndian)
return BitConverter.ToInt32(BitConverter.IsLittleEndian ? data.Skip(offset).Take(4).Reverse().ToArray() : data, 0);
return BitConverter.ToInt32(data, offset);
}
public static Int64 ToInt64(byte[] data, int offset)
{
if (BitConverter.IsLittleEndian)
return BitConverter.ToInt64(BitConverter.IsLittleEndian ? data.Skip(offset).Take(8).Reverse().ToArray() : data, 0);
return BitConverter.ToInt64(data, offset);
}
You can also use Jon Skeet "Misc Utils" library, available at https://jonskeet.uk/csharp/miscutil/
His library has many utility functions. For Big/Little endian conversions you can check the MiscUtil/Conversion/EndianBitConverter.cs file.
var littleEndianBitConverter = new MiscUtil.Conversion.LittleEndianBitConverter();
littleEndianBitConverter.ToInt64(bytes, offset);
var bigEndianBitConverter = new MiscUtil.Conversion.BigEndianBitConverter();
bigEndianBitConverter.ToInt64(bytes, offset);
His software is from 2009 but I guess it's still relevant.
I dislike BitConverter, because (as Marc Gravell answered) it is specced to rely on system endianness, meaning you technically have to do a system endianness check every time you use BitConverter to ensure you don't have to reverse the array. And usually, with saved files, you generally know the endianness you're trying to read, and that might not be the same. You might just be handling file formats with big-endian values, too, like, for instance, PNG chunks.
Because of that, I just wrote my own methods for this, which take a byte array, the read offset and read length as arguments, as well as a boolean to specify the endianness handling, and which uses bit shifting for efficiency:
public static UInt64 ReadIntFromByteArray(Byte[] data, Int32 startIndex, Int32 bytes, Boolean littleEndian)
{
Int32 lastByte = bytes - 1;
if (data.Length < startIndex + bytes)
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("startIndex", "Data array is too small to read a " + bytes + "-byte value at offset " + startIndex + ".");
UInt64 value = 0;
for (Int32 index = 0; index < bytes; index++)
{
Int32 offs = startIndex + (littleEndian ? index : lastByte - index);
value |= (((UInt64)data[offs]) << (8 * index));
}
return value;
}
This code can handle any value between 1 and 8 bytes, both little-endian and big-endian. The only small usage peculiarity is that you need to both give the amount of bytes to read, and need to specifically cast the result to the type you want.
Example from some code where I used it to read the header of some proprietary image type:
Int16 imageWidth = (Int16) ReadIntFromByteArray(fileData, hdrOffset, 2, true);
Int16 imageHeight = (Int16) ReadIntFromByteArray(fileData, hdrOffset + 2, 2, true);
This will read two consecutive 16-bit integers off an array, as signed little-endian values. You can of course just make a bunch of overload functions for all possibilities, like this:
public Int16 ReadInt16FromByteArrayLe(Byte[] data, Int32 startIndex)
{
return (Int16) ReadIntFromByteArray(data, startIndex, 2, true);
}
But personally I didn't bother with that.
And, here's the same for writing bytes:
public static void WriteIntToByteArray(Byte[] data, Int32 startIndex, Int32 bytes, Boolean littleEndian, UInt64 value)
{
Int32 lastByte = bytes - 1;
if (data.Length < startIndex + bytes)
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("startIndex", "Data array is too small to write a " + bytes + "-byte value at offset " + startIndex + ".");
for (Int32 index = 0; index < bytes; index++)
{
Int32 offs = startIndex + (littleEndian ? index : lastByte - index);
data[offs] = (Byte) (value >> (8*index) & 0xFF);
}
}
The only requirement here is that you have to cast the input arg to 64-bit unsigned integer when passing it to the function.
public static unsafe int Reverse(int value)
{
byte* p = (byte*)&value;
return (*p << 24) | (p[1] << 16) | (p[2] << 8) | p[3];
}
If unsafe is allowed... Based on Marc Gravell's post
This will reverse the data inline if unsafe code is allowed...
fixed (byte* wavepointer = waveData)
new Span<byte>(wavepointer + offset, 4).Reverse();
In order to utilize a byte to its fullest potential, I'm attempting to store two unique values into a byte: one in the first four bits and another in the second four bits. However, I've found that, while this practice allows for optimized memory allocation, it makes changing the individual values stored in the byte difficult.
In my code, I want to change the first set of four bits in a byte while maintaining the value of the second four bits in the same byte. While bitwise operations allow me to easily retrieve and manipulate the first four bit values, I'm finding it difficult to concatenate this new value with the second set of four bits in a byte. The question is, how can I erase the first four bits from a byte (or, more accurately, set them all the zero) and add the new set of 4 bits to replace the four bits that were just erased, thus preserving the last 4 bits in a byte while changing the first four?
Here's an example:
// Changes the first four bits in a byte to the parameter value
public void changeFirstFourBits(byte newFirstFour)
{
// If 'newFirstFour' is 0101 in binary, make 'value' 01011111 in binary, changing
// the first four bits but leaving the second four alone.
}
private byte value = 255; // binary: 11111111
Use bitwise AND (&) to clear out the old bits, shift the new bits to the correct position and bitwise OR (|) them together:
value = (value & 0xF) | (newFirstFour << 4);
Here's what happens:
value : abcdefgh
newFirstFour : 0000xyzw
0xF : 00001111
value & 0xF : 0000efgh
newFirstFour << 4 : xyzw0000
(value & 0xF) | (newFirstFour << 4) : xyzwefgh
When I have to do bit-twiddling like this, I make a readonly struct to do it for me. A four-bit integer is called nybble, of course:
struct TwoNybbles
{
private readonly byte b;
public byte High { get { return (byte)(b >> 4); } }
public byte Low { get { return (byte)(b & 0x0F); } {
public TwoNybbles(byte high, byte low)
{
this.b = (byte)((high << 4) | (low & 0x0F));
}
And then add implicit conversions between TwoNybbles and byte. Now you can just treat any byte as having a High and Low byte without putting all that ugly bit twiddling in your mainline code.
You first mask out you the high four bytes using value & 0xF. Then you shift the new bits to the high four bits using newFirstFour << 4 and finally you combine them together using binary or.
public void changeHighFourBits(byte newHighFour)
{
value=(byte)( (value & 0x0F) | (newFirstFour << 4));
}
public void changeLowFourBits(byte newLowFour)
{
value=(byte)( (value & 0xF0) | newLowFour);
}
I'm not really sure what your method there is supposed to do, but here are some methods for you:
void setHigh(ref byte b, byte val) {
b = (b & 0xf) | (val << 4);
}
byte high(byte b) {
return (b & 0xf0) >> 4;
}
void setLow(ref byte b, byte val) {
b = (b & 0xf0) | val;
}
byte low(byte b) {
return b & 0xf;
}
Should be self-explanatory.
public int SplatBit(int Reg, int Val, int ValLen, int Pos)
{
int mask = ((1 << ValLen) - 1) << Pos;
int newv = Val << Pos;
int res = (Reg & ~mask) | newv;
return res;
}
Example:
Reg = 135
Val = 9 (ValLen = 4, because 9 = 1001)
Pos = 2
135 = 10000111
9 = 1001
9 << Pos = 100100
Result = 10100111
A quick look would indicate that a bitwise and can be achieved using the & operator. So to remove the first four bytes you should be able to do:
byte value1=255; //11111111
byte value2=15; //00001111
return value1&value2;
Assuming newVal contains the value you want to store in origVal.
Do this for the 4 least significant bits:
byte origVal = ???;
byte newVal = ???
orig = (origVal & 0xF0) + newVal;
and this for the 4 most significant bits:
byte origVal = ???;
byte newVal = ???
orig = (origVal & 0xF) + (newVal << 4);
I know you asked specifically about clearing out the first four bits, which has been answered several times, but I wanted to point out that if you have two values <= decimal 15, you can combine them into 8 bits simply with this:
public int setBits(int upperFour, int lowerFour)
{
return upperFour << 4 | lowerFour;
}
The result will be xxxxyyyy where
xxxx = upperFour
yyyy = lowerFour
And that is what you seem to be trying to do.
Here's some code, but I think the earlier answers will do it for you. This is just to show some sort of test code to copy and past into a simple console project (the WriteBits method by be of help):
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int b1 = 255;
WriteBits(b1);
int b2 = b1 >> 4;
WriteBits(b2);
int b3 = b1 & ~0xF ;
WriteBits(b3);
// Store 5 in first nibble
int b4 = 5 << 4;
WriteBits(b4);
// Store 8 in second nibble
int b5 = 8;
WriteBits(b5);
// Store 5 and 8 in first and second nibbles
int b6 = 0;
b6 |= (5 << 4) + 8;
WriteBits(b6);
// Store 2 and 4
int b7 = 0;
b7 = StoreFirstNibble(2, b7);
b7 = StoreSecondNibble(4, b7);
WriteBits(b7);
// Read First Nibble
int first = ReadFirstNibble(b7);
WriteBits(first);
// Read Second Nibble
int second = ReadSecondNibble(b7);
WriteBits(second);
}
static int ReadFirstNibble(int storage)
{
return storage >> 4;
}
static int ReadSecondNibble(int storage)
{
return storage &= 0xF;
}
static int StoreFirstNibble(int val, int storage)
{
return storage |= (val << 4);
}
static int StoreSecondNibble(int val, int storage)
{
return storage |= val;
}
static void WriteBits(int b)
{
Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(BitConverter.GetBytes(b),0));
}
}