I want to do a query with linq (list of objects) and I really don't know how to do it, I can do the group and the sum but can't select rest of the fields.
Example:
ID Value Name Category
1 5 Name1 Category1
1 7 Name1 Category1
2 1 Name2 Category2
3 6 Name3 Category3
3 2 Name3 Category3
I want to group by ID, SUM by Value and return all fields like this.
ID Value Name Category
1 12 Name1 Category1
2 1 Name2 Category2
3 8 Name3 Category3
Updated :
If you're trying to avoid grouping for all the fields, you can group just by Id:
data.GroupBy(d => d.Id)
.Select(
g => new
{
Key = g.Key,
Value = g.Sum(s => s.Value),
Name = g.First().Name,
Category = g.First().Category
});
But this code assumes that for each Id, the same Name and Category apply. If so, you should consider normalizing as #Aron suggests. It would imply keeping Id and Value in one class and moving Name, Category (and whichever other fields would be the same for the same Id) to another class, while also having the Id for reference. The normalization process reduces data redundancy and dependency.
void Main()
{
//Me being lazy in init
var foos = new []
{
new Foo { Id = 1, Value = 5},
new Foo { Id = 1, Value = 7},
new Foo { Id = 2, Value = 1},
new Foo { Id = 3, Value = 6},
new Foo { Id = 3, Value = 2},
};
foreach(var x in foos)
{
x.Name = "Name" + x.Id;
x.Category = "Category" + x.Id;
}
//end init.
var result = from x in foos
group x.Value by new { x.Id, x.Name, x.Category}
into g
select new { g.Key.Id, g.Key.Name, g.Key.Category, Value = g.Sum()};
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
// Define other methods and classes here
public class Foo
{
public int Id {get;set;}
public int Value {get;set;}
public string Name {get;set;}
public string Category {get;set;}
}
If your class is really long and you don't want to copy all the stuff, you can try something like this:
l.GroupBy(x => x.id).
Select(x => {
var ret = x.First();
ret.value = x.Sum(xt => xt.value);
return ret;
}).ToList();
With great power great responsibility comes. You need to be careful. Line ret.value = x.Sum(xt => xt.value) will change your original collection, as you are passing reference, not new object. If you want to avoid it, you need to add some Clone method into your class like MemberwiseClone (but again, this will create shallow copy, so be careful). Afer that just replace the line with: var ret = x.First().Clone();
try this:
var objList = new List<SampleObject>();
objList.Add(new SampleObject() { ID = 1, Value = 5, Name = "Name1", Category = "Catergory1"});
objList.Add(new SampleObject() { ID = 1, Value = 7, Name = "Name1", Category = "Catergory1"});
objList.Add(new SampleObject() { ID = 2, Value = 1, Name = "Name2", Category = "Catergory2"});
objList.Add(new SampleObject() { ID = 3, Value = 6, Name = "Name3", Category = "Catergory3"});
objList.Add(new SampleObject() { ID = 3, Value = 2, Name = "Name3", Category = "Catergory3"});
var newList = from val in objList
group val by new { val.ID, val.Name, val.Category } into grouped
select new SampleObject() { ID = grouped.ID, Value = grouped.Sum(), Name = grouped.Name, Category = grouped.Category };
to check with LINQPad:
newList.Dump();
Related
I was looking to get items from ListA, where the value of Id is same in both of the lists, and the count of Id must be more than 1 in list A or list B
var items = itemsA.Where(x => itemsB.Select(y => y.Id == x.Id).Count() > 1);
This gives me the result where same Ids in itemsB is more then 1, I want to use a or condition to check for the same counter in itemsA
Eg 1:
ListA=[{"id"=1,"name="abc"},{"id=1, "name"="def"}]
ListB=[{"id=2","name="xyz"}, {"id=1, "name"="mno"}]
Should return [{"id"=1,"name="abc"},{"id=1, "name"="def"}] because id =1 exists in listB and the count of id with value 1 in listA is more then 1.
Eg 2:
ListA=[{"id"=2,"name="abc"},{"id=1, "name"="def"}]
ListB=[{"id=1","name="xyz"}, {"id=1, "name"="mno"}]
should return {"id=1, "name"="def"} because common id in both list is 1 and the count of id with value 1 in ListB is more then 1.
I am not certain this is the best solution, but as far as I've understood the question, it should be a solution.
Assuming you have an Item class as follows:
public class Item
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
and define itemsA and itemsB as List<Item>s, you can first find all Ids that are present in both lists, then select the applicable items from itemsA based on occurrence of each Id in either list:
IEnumerable<int> idsInBothItemLists = itemsA
.Select(a => a.Id)
.Intersect(itemsB.Select(b => b.Id))
.Distinct();
List<Item> items = itemsA
.Where(a => idsInBothItemLists.Contains(a.Id))
.GroupBy(a => a.Id)
.Where(gr =>
gr.Skip(1).Any() ||
itemsB.Where(b => b.Id == gr.Key).Skip(1).Any())
.SelectMany(gr => gr.Select(item => item))
.ToList();
(.Skip(1).Any() serves the same purpose as .Count() > 1 in your original code; it simply checks whether there are any items left after skipping the first item.)
Printing the output from the suggested population of itemsA and itemsB
foreach (var entry in items)
{
Console.WriteLine(entry.Id + " " + entry.Name);
}
e.g. for input
var itemsA = new List<Item>
{
new Item { Id = 1, Name = "abc" },
new Item { Id = 3, Name = "def" },
new Item { Id = 1, Name = "ghi" },
new Item { Id = 2, Name = "jkl" }
};
var itemsB = new List<Item>
{
new Item { Id = 2, Name = "xyz" },
new Item { Id = 2, Name = "jkl" },
new Item { Id = 1, Name = "mno" },
new Item { Id = 3, Name = "pqr" }
};
gives
1 abc
1 ghi
2 jkl
I have the below set of data
Where each City belongs to a specific Department, which belongs to a specific Region, which belongs to a specific Country (in this case there is only one country: France).
This data is contained in a CSV file which I can read from on a row-by-row basis, however my goal is to convert this data into a tree structure (with France being at the root).
Each of these nodes will be given a specific Id value, which is something I've already gone and done, but the tricky part is that each node here must also contain a ParentId (for instance Belley and Gex need the ParentId of Ain, but Moulins and Vichy need the ParentId of Aller).
Below is a snippet of code I've written that has assigned an Id value to each name in this data set, along with some other values:
int id = 0;
List<CoverageAreaLevel> coverageAreas = GetCoverageAreaDataFromCsv(path, true);
List<LevelList> levelLists = new List<LevelList>
{
new LevelList { Names = coverageAreas.Select(a => a.Level1).Distinct().ToList(), Level = "1" },
new LevelList { Names = coverageAreas.Select(a => a.Level2).Distinct().ToList(), Level = "2" },
new LevelList { Names = coverageAreas.Select(a => a.Level3).Distinct().ToList(), Level = "3" },
new LevelList { Names = coverageAreas.Select(a => a.Level4).Distinct().ToList(), Level = "4" }
};
List<CoverageArea> newCoverageAreas = new List<CoverageArea>();
foreach (LevelList levelList in levelLists)
{
foreach (string name in levelList.Names)
{
CoverageArea coverageArea = new CoverageArea
{
Id = id++.ToString(),
Description = name,
FullDescription = name,
Level = levelList.Level
};
newCoverageAreas.Add(coverageArea);
}
}
The levelLists variable contains a sort-of heirarchical structure of the data that I'm looking for, but none of the items in that list are linked together by anything.
Any idea of how this could be implemented? I can manually figure out each ParentId, but I'd like to automate this process, especially if this needs to be done in the future.
The solution from #Camilo is really good and pragmatic. I would also suggest the use of a tree.
A sample implementation:
var countries = models.GroupBy(xco => xco.Country)
.Select((xco, index) =>
{
var country = new Tree<String>();
country.Value = xco.Key;
country.Children = xco.GroupBy(xr => xr.Region)
.Select((xr, xrIndex) =>
{
var region = new Tree<String>();
region.Value = xr.Key;
region.Parent = country;
region.Children =
xr.GroupBy(xd => xd.Department)
.Select((xd, index) =>
{
var department = new Tree<String>();
department.Value = xd.Key;
department.Parent = region;
department.Children = xd
.Select(xc => new Tree<String> { Value = xc.City, Parent = department });
return department;
});
return region;
});
return country;
});
public class Tree<T>
{
public IEnumerable<Tree<T>> Children;
public T Value;
public Tree<T> Parent;
}
One way you could solve this is by building dictionaries with the names and IDs of each level.
Assuming you have data like this:
var models = new List<Model>
{
new Model { Country = "France", Region = "FranceRegionA", Department = "FranceDept1", City = "FranceA" },
new Model { Country = "France", Region = "FranceRegionA", Department = "FranceDept1", City = "FranceB" },
new Model { Country = "France", Region = "FranceRegionA", Department = "FranceDept2", City = "FranceC" },
new Model { Country = "France", Region = "FranceRegionB", Department = "FranceDept3", City = "FranceD" },
new Model { Country = "Italy", Region = "ItalyRegionA", Department = "ItalyDept1", City = "ItalyA" },
new Model { Country = "Italy", Region = "ItalyRegionA", Department = "ItalyDept2", City = "ItalyB" },
};
You could do something like this, which can probably be improved further if needed:
var countries = models.GroupBy(x => x.Country)
.Select((x, index) => Tuple.Create(x.Key, new { Id = index + 1 }))
.ToDictionary(x => x.Item1, x => x.Item2);
var regions = models.GroupBy(x => x.Region)
.Select((x, index) => Tuple.Create(x.Key, new { ParentId = countries[x.First().Country].Id, Id = index + 1 }))
.ToDictionary(x => x.Item1, x => x.Item2);
var departments = models.GroupBy(x => x.Department)
.Select((x, index) => Tuple.Create(x.Key, new { ParentId = regions[x.First().Region].Id, Id = index + 1 }))
.ToDictionary(x => x.Item1, x => x.Item2);
var cities = models
.Select((x, index) => Tuple.Create(x.City, new { ParentId = departments[x.Department].Id, Id = index + 1 }))
.ToDictionary(x => x.Item1, x => x.Item2);
The main idea is to leverage the index parameter of the Select method and the speed of dictionaries to find the parent ID.
Sample output from a fiddle:
countries:
[France, { Id = 1 }],
[Italy, { Id = 2 }]
regions:
[FranceRegionA, { ParentId = 1, Id = 1 }],
[FranceRegionB, { ParentId = 1, Id = 2 }],
[ItalyRegionA, { ParentId = 2, Id = 3 }]
departments:
[FranceDept1, { ParentId = 1, Id = 1 }],
[FranceDept2, { ParentId = 1, Id = 2 }],
[FranceDept3, { ParentId = 2, Id = 3 }],
[ItalyDept1, { ParentId = 3, Id = 4 }],
[ItalyDept2, { ParentId = 3, Id = 5 }]
cities:
[FranceA, { ParentId = 1, Id = 1 }],
[FranceB, { ParentId = 1, Id = 2 }],
[FranceC, { ParentId = 2, Id = 3 }],
[FranceD, { ParentId = 3, Id = 4 }],
[ItalyA, { ParentId = 4, Id = 5 }],
[ItalyB, { ParentId = 5, Id = 6 }]
I have created a view that combines multiple foreign key tables.So the fetched data looks something like this:
Id Name TagId DepartmentId Code
1 N1 T1 NULL NULL
1 N1 T2 NULL NULL
1 N1 NULL D1 NULL
1 N1 NULL NULL C1
1 N1 NULL NULL C2
2 N2 T3 NULL NULL
2 N2 NULL D2 NULL
Want the result in model format like this:
[{
Id: 1,
Name: N1,
TagIds: [T1, T2],
DepartmentId: D1,
Codes: [C1, C2]
},
{
Id: 2,
Name: N2,
TagIds: [T3],
DepartmentId: D2,
Codes: []
}]
What is the most easy and efficient way to achieve this?
You haven't actually shown us what you've tried, but if you grab your entire view data into an IEnumerable into memory, you can use Linq's GroupBy to define groups, from which within you can use Linq filtering and projecting to map out the various properties in each Group.
I've assumed Id and Name have a 1:1 cardinality, so have used that in a Value Tuple grouping key. The output is projected to an anonymous type.
Your final output requires Json Serialization, but you can find any number of answers on SO to do that:
var groups = items.GroupBy(i => (i.Id, i.Name))
.Select(grp => new
{
grp.Key.Id,
grp.Key.Name,
TagIds = grp.Where(i => i.TagId != null)
.Select(x => x.TagId)
.ToArray(),
DepartmentId = grp.FirstOrDefault(i => i.DepartmentId != null)?.DepartmentId,
Codes = grp.Where(i => i.Code != null)
.Select(x => x.Code)
.ToArray(),
});
Test Data Here:
var items = new[]{
new {Id = 1, Name = "N1", TagId = "T1", DepartmentId = (string)null, Code = (string)null},
new {Id = 1, Name = "N1", TagId = "T2", DepartmentId = (string)null, Code = (string)null},
new {Id = 1, Name = "N1", TagId = (string)null, DepartmentId = "D1", Code = (string)null},
new {Id = 1, Name = "N1", TagId = (string)null, DepartmentId = (string)null, Code = "C1"},
new {Id = 1, Name = "N1", TagId = (string)null, DepartmentId = (string)null, Code = "C2"},
new {Id = 2, Name = "N2", TagId = "T3", DepartmentId = (string)null, Code = (string)null},
new {Id = 2, Name = "N2", TagId = (string)null, DepartmentId = "D2", Code = (string)null},
};
The output looks like so in LinqPad:
You can easily do it using Linq`s GroupBy method.
Here is a clean example:
var result = items.GroupBy(i => new { i.Id, i.Name })
.Select(g => new Result
{
Id = g.Key.Id,
Name = g.Key.Name,
TagIds = g.Select(i => i.TagId).ToList(),
DepartmentId = g.FirstOrDefault(i => i.DepartmentId != null)?.DepartmentId,
Codes = g.Select(i => i.Code).ToList();
});
I have a list of object (ProductInfo).
ProductInfo contains an id, name, and an option.
Imagine this sample, i have this
ProductInfo Id => 1, Name => XXX, Option = A
ProductInfo Id => 1, Name => XXX, Option = B
ProductInfo Id => 2, Name => DEB, Option = A
ProductInfo Id => 2, Name => DEB, Option = B
ProductInfo Id => 2, Name => DEB, Option = C
ProductInfo Id => 3, Name => ZZZ, Option = D
....
....
We see we have 2 time the option A AND B for product 1 and 2.
My goal will be to obtain the max repeat item for each product in the list.
i would like to obtain as result this :
Id = 1, Name = XXX = A, count = 2
Id =2, Name = DEB, count = 2
How i can do that ?
thanks for your time
try to do this code:
var list = new List<ProductInfo> {
new ProductInfo { Id = 1, Name = "XXX", Option = "A"},
new ProductInfo { Id = 1, Name = "XXX", Option = "B" },
new ProductInfo { Id = 2, Name = "DEB", Option = "A" },
new ProductInfo { Id = 2, Name = "DEB", Option = "B"},
new ProductInfo { Id = 2, Name = "DEB", Option = "C" },
new ProductInfo { Id = 3, Name = "ZZZ", Option = "D" }
};
var x = from p in list
group p by new { p.Id, p.Name, p.Option } into g
select new
{
Id = g.Key.Id,
Name = g.Key.Name,
Count = list.Count(m => m.Name == g.Key.Name)
};
var t = x.Distinct();
You can use GroupBy on the Name and Id parameter. Sorry read that wrong at first.
First question :)
I have a List<Materiau> (where Materiau implements IComparable<Materiau>), and I would like to remove all duplicates and add them together
(if two Materiau is the same (using the comparator), merge it to the first and remove the second from the list)
A Materiau contains an ID and a quantity, when I merge two Materiau using += or +, it keeps the same ID, and the quantity is added
I cannot control the input of the list.
I would like something like this:
List<Materiau> materiaux = getList().mergeDuplicates();
Thank you for your time :)
Check out Linq! Specifically the GroupBy method.
I don't know how familiar you are with sql, but Linq lets you query collections similarly to how sql works.
It's a bit in depth to explain of you are totally unfamiliar, but Code Project has a wonderful example
To sum it up:
Imagine we have this
List<Product> prodList = new List<Product>
{
new Product
{
ID = 1,
Quantity = 1
},
new Product
{
ID = 2,
Quantity = 2
},
new Product
{
ID = 3,
Quantity = 7
},
new Product
{
ID = 4,
Quantity = 3
}
};
and we wanted to group all the duplicate products, and sum their quantities.
We can do this:
var groupedProducts = prodList.GroupBy(item => item.ID)
and then select the values out of the grouping, with the aggregates as needed
var results = groupedProducts.Select( i => new Product
{
ID = i.Key, // this is what we Grouped By above
Quantity = i.Sum(prod => prod.Quantity) // we want to sum up all the quantities in this grouping
});
and boom! we have a list of aggregated products
Lets say you have a class
class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Value { get; set; }
}
and a bunch of them inside a list
var foocollection = new List<Foo> {
new Foo { Id = 1, Value = 1, },
new Foo { Id = 2, Value = 1, },
new Foo { Id = 2, Value = 1, },
};
then you can group them and build the aggregate on each group
var foogrouped = foocollection
.GroupBy( f => f.Id )
.Select( g => new Foo { Id = g.Key, Value = g.Aggregate( 0, ( a, f ) => a + f.Value ) } )
.ToList();
List<Materiau> distinctList = getList().Distinct(EqualityComparer<Materiau>.Default).ToList();