We Keep Coding

Update process from within method called by backgroundworker c#

I have an application with a gui and a Rich Text Box where I output what the program is currently doing since data processing can be quite long.
I tried two approaches for that:
1 In the Backgroundworker method I can just call the following code fine:
GlobalVar.backgroundWorkerAppendText = task.Build_CSV_List();
Processchange();
Whereas I cannot use Form1.Processchange(); in the helper class due to the non static context
2 Therefore I tried to create my very first eventhandler.
The Idea was that helper.UpdateConsole() would raise an event
public event EventHandler OnConsoleUpdate;
public void Consoleupdate()
{
OnConsoleUpdate(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
to which the Backgroundworker listens and then calls Processchange from its context
public void BackgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
StandardTasks task = new StandardTasks();
Helper helper = new Helper();
helper.OnConsoleUpdate += Processchange;
task.DoSomeStuffHere()
}
public void Processchange(object sender=null, EventArgs e=null)
{
//MessageBox.Show(GlobalVar.backgroundWorkerAppendText);
GlobalVar.next = false;
backgroundWorker1.ReportProgress(1);
while (GlobalVar.next == false)
{
helper.TimeBreaker(100,"ms");
}
}
Unfortunately this was was not successful. As soon as rising the Event I get the errormessage System.NullReferenceException which -after googling- leads me to the conclusion that there is no listerner attached to the event eventhouh I attached it in the Backgroundworker Do work.
Edit: the OnConsoleUpdate() == null as shown on the screenshot below
event = null
The helper is in another class file "helpers" which might be important for a solution.
i hope you guys can help me out.

Welcome to SO!
A few things immediately jump to mind.
First, let's get the event issue out of the way. You've got the correct approach - you need an event and method to call it, but that method should check if the event is null.
Basically, do this:
public event EventHandler OnConsoleUpdate;
public void ConsoleUpdate()
{
OnConsoleUpdate?.Invoke(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
The above makes use of ?, a null-condition operator. You can read more about it on this MSDN page.
Second thing... it's unclear what your background worker actually IS. It sounds like it's some kind of custom class you crated? The reason it's important is because .NET actually has a BackgroundWorker class used for running operations... well, in the background. It also has an OnProgressChanged event which you can hook up to which could be used to update the UI (just remember to set the WorkerReportsProgress property to true). And to use the BackgroundWorker mentioned above, you shouldn't need to create any events of your own.
Here's how you can use the standard .NET BackgroundWorker:
System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker worker = new System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker();
void StartBackgroundTask()
{
worker.DoWork += worker_DoWork;
//if it's possible to display progress, use this
worker.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
worker.ProgressChanged += worker_ProgressChanged;
//what to do when the method finishes?
worker.RunWorkerCompleted += worker_RunWorkerCompleted;
//start!
worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
void worker_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, System.ComponentModel.RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
//perform any "finalization" operations, like re-enable disabled buttons
//display the result using the data in e.Result
//this code will be running in the UI thread
}
//example of a container class to pass more data in the ReportProgress event
public class ProgressData
{
public string OperationDescription { get; set; }
public int CurrentResult { get; set; }
//feel free to add more stuff here
}
void worker_ProgressChanged(object sender, System.ComponentModel.ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
//display the progress using e.ProgressPercentage or e.UserState
//this code will be running in the UI thread
//UserState can be ANYTHING:
//var data = (ProgressData)e.UserState;
}
void worker_DoWork(object sender, System.ComponentModel.DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
//this code will NOT be running in the UI thread!
//you should NOT call the UI thread from this method
int result = 1;
//perform calculations
for (var i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
{
worker.ReportProgress(i, new ProgressData(){ OperationDescription = "CustomState passed as second, optional parameter", CurrentResult = result });
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
result *= i;
}
e.Result = result;
}
Now, the thing about the BackgroundWorker class is that it is rather old, and with current .NET versions you can use the async / await keywords to easily handle background operations and UI updates, but this probably is going outside the bounds of this question. That said, the existence of async / await doesn't invalidate the use of BackgroundWorker which is pretty simple in its usage.
There's one more worrisome thing in your code.
public void BackgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
StandardTasks task = new StandardTasks(); //<- you create a task
Helper helper = new Helper(); // <- you create a helper
helper.OnConsoleUpdate += Processchange; // <- you hook up to the helper event
task.DoSomeStuffHere(); // <- you do stuff with the task... but the task doesn't know about your helper above! Does `StandardTasks` use `Helper`? If so, how?
}
Do note that events, unless made static, aren't global. So hooking up to an event in one instance of a class won't cause another instance of that class to "fire" that event. It seems one way to fix your issues would be to make the StandardTasks class take Helper as one of the constructor parameters, so the code would look like this:
Helper helper = new Helper(); // <- you create a helper
helper.OnConsoleUpdate += Processchange; // <- you hook up to the helper class event to actually do something
StandardTasks task = new StandardTasks(helper); //<- you create a task which will use the helper with the hooked up event above

How to make a timer that redo the event programmatically?

So I want to perform some button clicks say every in 10 second, and here is my code:
using System;
using System.Timers;
public class Main : Form {
public Main() {
InitializeComponent();
// add timer to do button clicking every 10 seconds
double elapse = 10000;
System.Timers.Timer timer2 = new Time(elapse);
timer2.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(ResetEvent);
timer2.AutoReset = true;
timer2.Start();
}
private void ResetEvent(object source, ElapsedEventArgs e) {
try {
Refresh_Button.PerformClick();
Process_Button.PerformClick();
} catch { }
}
private void Refresh_Button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
// some code
}
private void Process_Button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
// some code
}
}
However, it doesn't work. Is there anything wrong with the code? How can I make it works?

The problem is accessing UI thread illegally in Elapsed event of System.Timers.Timer.
You are calling Refresh_Button.PerformClick(); in Elapsed event of timer that cause an cross thread exception that you are hiding it.
To access UI thtread and call PerformClick() method of Refresh_Button:
Refresh_Button.Invoke(new Action(() => { Refresh_Button.PerformClick(); }));
Also you can use System.Windows.Forms.Timer instead and handle Tick event and call Refresh_Button.PerformClick(); manually.
Note:
Don't hide exceptions. If you hide exceptions, such problems will hide and finding them will be really hard.
It's better to put the logic a method and instead of calling PerformClick, call that method.
If you don't need a different thread, System.Windows.Forms.Timer whould be enough.

Check if event (doubleClick) is running

I am writing a tool which switchs between a lot of states. For some events I need to be sure they wont get executed a second time while the called function (inside the event) is running. This is how I managed it before:
// Global variables //
public bool func1IsRunning = false;
public bool func2IsRunning = false;
...
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if(!func1IsRunning)
{
func1();
func1IsRunning = false;
}
}
public void func1()
{
func1IsRunning = true;
// some code in here //
}
But with every extension of my tool the list of the global variables grows up. Also the events and functions getting less clear to read.
Isnt there a way like this(?):
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if(DoubleClick.IsHandled)
{
func1();
}
}
public void func1()
{
// some code in here //
// ................. //
DoubleClick.IsHandled = true; // at the end of the function //
}
So what I am looking for is a way to determine if an event is still running or not. My code is working, im just unhappy with how it looks like.
Any ideas?
UPDATE 1
I decided to use Steve's answer as it solves my problem by the clearest way.
Anyway it is NOT running correctly for now.
Here is how my code looks like:
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
listView.DoubleClick -= new EventHandler(listView_DoubleClick);
itemEdit();
}
finally
{
listView.DoubleClick += new EventHandler(listView_DoubleClick);
}
}
The code above is NOT disabling the handler.
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
listView.DoubleClick -= listView_DoubleClick;
itemEdit();
}
finally
{
listView.DoubleClick += listView_DoubleClick;
}
}
This code is also not disabling the handler.
This is the line where the handler gets enabled (MainForm.Designer.cs):
this.listView.DoubleClick += new System.EventHandler(this.listView_DoubleClick);
There are no errors raised. The event just gets fired again and again. Where is the problem?
UPDATE 2:
As Sinatr asked in the comments below if my function is really waiting or just enabling user input he discovered where the mistake was made.
Steve's answer is correct according to my wrong written question. Thanks a lot to all of you guys.

Just disable the event handler
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
listView.DoubleClick -= listView_DoubleClick;
// Now, even if func1 causes a DoubleClick event,
// or user manages to trigger a DobuleClick
// there is no event registered and this code could
// reentered until you exit from func1.
func1();
}
finally
{
// Important part. the finally block is required
// because you should readd the event handler
// ALSO in case an exception occurs in func1
// and it is not handled there
listView.DoubleClick += listView_DoubleClick;
}
}
EDIT
Looking at your comment I suspect that this DoubleClick event is assigned to more than one control. If this is the case, using the global listView global instance of a listview doesn't disable the double click on other controls that are linked to the same code.
If this is the case then you need a more generic approach
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Control c = sender as Control;
try
{
if(c != null)
{
c.DoubleClick -= listView_DoubleClick;
// Now, even if func1 causes a DoubleClick event,
// or user manages to trigger a DobuleClick
// there is no event registered and this code could
// reentered until you exit from func1.
func1();
}
}
finally
{
// Important part. the finally block is required
// because you should readd the event handler
// ALSO in case an exception occurs in func1
// and it is not handled there
if(c != null) c.DoubleClick += listView_DoubleClick;
}
}
Of course, this is just to enable/disable DoubleClicks events, it cannot works if you assign this event handler to other standard events like Click that have the same signature (object sender, EventArgs e)

How about something like the following using locks:
private object globalLock = new object();
private Dictionary<int, object> lockObjects = new Dictionary<int, object>();
public void listView_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
object lockObject;
lock (globalLock) // to avoid two threads creating the object
{
if (!lockObjects.ContainsKey(1))
lockObjects.Add(1, new object());
lockObject = lockObjects[1];
}
if (Monitor.TryEnter(lockObject) // enter only if no thread has already entered
{
try { func1(); }
finally { Monitor.Exit(lockObject); }
}
}
This is different to Steve's logic in the matter that it is thread-safe.

A simple state-machine should solve your problem without requiring too many variables. Create an Enum named AppState like this:
enum AppState
{
Ready = 1,
InsideListView1Click = 2,
InsideListView1DoubleClick = 3
InsideListView2Click = 4,
InsideListView2DoubleClick = 5
}
This enum could grow as you add new controls and/or event-handlers to your application. Now use a single global variable that keeps track of the application state and modify it inside event-handlers appropriately:
private AppState m_State = AppState.Ready;
And in the event-handlers you would do:
private void ListView1_DoubleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
lock
{
if(m_State != AppState.Ready)
return;
else
m_State = AppState.InsideListView1DoubleClick;
}
//Do your stuff
m_State = AppState.Ready;
}
This way newer calls will be ignored instead of being queued. If you expect to be in multiple states at the same time, you could apply [Flags] attribute on this enum as well. Also note that enums are thread-safe and evaluating them is atomic, so multi-threading shouldn't be a problem either.

How to display the time elapsed in a label

What should be straight forward is not here and I couldnt find a way yet in spite of reading a lot.
I have a button which executes a time consuming function. So on clicking the button should show time elapsed in milliseconds in a label with an interval of 500 ms. And when the desired result is achieved I want the timer to stop. I dont just need the final time (the total time consumed) in a label, but the label should dynamically show the time being elapsed. My code would be:
private void btnHistory_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Class1 c = new Class1();
c.StartClock(ref label12);
Utility.PopulateHistory(dgvRecords_history, _util); //time consuming function
c.StopClock();
}
And in Class1 I write this:
internal void StartClock(ref Label l)
{
Timer t = new Timer();
t.Interval = 500;
t.Enabled = true;
t.Tag = l;
t.Tick += new EventHandler(t_Tick);
t.Start();
}
int i;
bool stop;
void t_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (stop)
{
((Timer)sender).Stop();
return;
}
((Label)((Timer)sender).Tag).Text = (++i).ToString();
}
internal void StopClock()
{
i = 0;
stop = true;
}
What happens is, the t_Tick event is fired only after the complete code under button event is fired. That is the tick event is fired after it goes through the StopClock function! I got no idea why on earth it should be that!
2 questions basically:
How can my requirement be achieved in the right way to handle these? I know I should use other built in classes to evaluate performance, but this is just for display purpose. For this, what is the ideal approach?
Why is my code not working?
EDIT: I have used here System.Windows.Forms Timer here, but the result is not any different with System.Timers Timer

The problem is that your long-running task is also running on the UI thread. So the timer can't fire and update the UI, since the thread is busy handling the long-running task.
Instead, you should use a BackgroundWorker to handle the long-running task.
In code:
private void btnHistory_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Class1 c = new Class1(ref label12);
c.StartClock();
var backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
backgroundWorker.DoWork += (s, e) =>
{
// time consuming function
Utility.PopulateHistory(dgvRecords_history, _util);
};
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += (s, e) =>
{
c.StopClock();
};
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
As ChrisWue noted, since you now have the long-running task in a separate thread, it needs to invoke any access to the UI controls on the UI thread.
If your long-running task just needs some data from the UI to start, you can pass that data as parameter of RunWorkerAsync(). If you need to output some result data to the UI, you can do that in the handler of the RunWorkerCompleted event. If you occasionally need to update the UI as progress is being made, you can do that in the handler of the ProgressChanged event, calling ReportProgress() in your DoWork handler.
If none of the above are needed, you could use the ThreadPool, as in StaWho's answer.

Your time consuming function is blocking the main thread. You can use BackgroundWorker or below trick:
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
t.Tick +=new EventHandler(t_Tick);
t.Interval = 500;
}
int timeElapsed = 0;
System.Windows.Forms.Timer t = new System.Windows.Forms.Timer();
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
t.Start();
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem((x) =>
{
TimeConsumingFunction();
});
}
void TimeConsumingFunction()
{
Thread.Sleep(10000);
t.Stop();
}
void t_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
timeElapsed += t.Interval;
label1.Text = timeElapsed.ToString();
}

Add the timer to the Components collection of the form. Or store the timer in a field in the class.
The timer is garbage collected because it is not longer reachable when your method returns.
I don't know about your long running code, but out should new run on a separate thread, or make calls to Application.DoEvents
(And remove the ref in your code, it is not used).

#Dainel Rose's answer worked for me perfectly, but only if invalid cross thread operation is handled. I could do so like:
private void btnHistory_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Class1 c = new Class1(ref label12);
c.StartClock();
var backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
backgroundWorker.DoWork += ((s, e) =>
{
// time consuming function
Utility.PopulateHistory(dgvRecords_history, _util);
});
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += ((s, e) =>
{
c.StopClock();
});
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
And in the Utility class where the time consuming function runs,
internal static void PopulateHistory(DataGridView dgv, Utility util)
{
SetDataGridView_History(dgv, util);
}
delegate void UpdateDataGridView_History(DataGridView dgv, Utility util);
static void SetDataGridView_History(DataGridView dgv, Utility util)
{
if (dgv.InvokeRequired)
{
UpdateDataGridView_History updaterDelegate = new UpdateDataGridView_History(SetDataGridView_History);
((Form)util._w).Invoke(updaterDelegate, new object[] { dgv, util });
}
else
//code that utilizes UI thread (long running process in my case)
}
Thanks all who helped. I'm marking Daniel's answer..

How to update GUI with backgroundworker?

I have spent the whole day trying to make my application use threads but with no luck. I have read much documentation about it and I still get lots of errors, so I hope you can help me.
I have one big time consuming method which calls the database and updates the GUI. This has to happen all the time(or about every 30 seconds).
public class UpdateController
{
private UserController _userController;
public UpdateController(LoginController loginController, UserController userController)
{
_userController = userController;
loginController.LoginEvent += Update;
}
public void Update()
{
BackgroundWorker backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
while(true)
{
backgroundWorker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(backgroundWorker_DoWork);
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
}
public void backgroundWorker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap();
}
}
With this approach I get an exception because the backgroundworker is not and STA thread(but from what I can understand this is what I should use). I have tried with a STA thread and that gave other errors.
I think the problem is because I try to update the GUI while doing the database call(in the background thread). I should only be doing the database call and then somehow it should switch back to the main thread. After the main thread has executed it should go back to the background thread and so on. But I can't see how to do that.
The application should update the GUI right after the database call. Firering events don't seem to work. The backgroundthread just enters them.
EDIT:
Some really great answers :) This is the new code:
public class UpdateController{
private UserController _userController;
private BackgroundWorker _backgroundWorker;
public UpdateController(LoginController loginController, UserController userController)
{
_userController = userController;
loginController.LoginEvent += Update;
_backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
_backgroundWorker.DoWork += backgroundWorker_DoWork;
_backgroundWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += backgroundWorker_RunWorkerCompleted;
}
public void _backgroundWorker_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap();
}
public void Update()
{
_backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
void backgroundWorker_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
//UI update
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000);
Update();
}
public void backgroundWorker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
// Big database task
}
}
But how can I make this run every 10 second? System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000) will just make my GUI freeze and while(true) loop in Update() as suggested gives an exception(Thread too busy).

You need to declare and configure the BackgroundWorker once - then Invoke the RunWorkerAsync method within your loop...
public class UpdateController
{
private UserController _userController;
private BackgroundWorker _backgroundWorker;
public UpdateController(LoginController loginController, UserController userController)
{
_userController = userController;
loginController.LoginEvent += Update;
_backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
_backgroundWorker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(backgroundWorker_DoWork);
_backgroundWorker.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(backgroundWorker_ProgressChanged);
_backgroundWorker.WorkerReportsProgress= true;
}
public void Update()
{
_backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
public void backgroundWorker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
while (true)
{
// Do the long-duration work here, and optionally
// send the update back to the UI thread...
int p = 0;// set your progress if appropriate
object param = "something"; // use this to pass any additional parameter back to the UI
_backgroundWorker.ReportProgress(p, param);
}
}
// This event handler updates the UI
private void backgroundWorker_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
// Update the UI here
// _userController.UpdateUsersOnMap();
}
}

You have to use the Control.InvokeRequired property to determine if you are on a background thread. Then you need to invoke your logic that modified your UI via the Control.Invoke method to force your UI operations to occur on the main thread. You do this by creating a delegate and passing it to the Control.Invoke method. The catch here is you need some object derived from Control to call these methods.
Edit: As another user posted, if yo you can wait to the BackgroundWorker.Completed event to update your UI then you can subscribe to that event and call your UI code directly. BackgroundWorker_Completed is called on the main app thread. my code assumes you want to do updates during the operation. One alternative to my method is to subscribe to the BwackgroundWorker.ProgressChanged event, but I believe you'll need to still call Invoke to update your UI in that case.
for example
public class UpdateController
{
private UserController _userController;
BackgroundWorker backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();
public UpdateController(LoginController loginController, UserController userController)
{
_userController = userController;
loginController.LoginEvent += Update;
}
public void Update()
{
// The while loop was unecessary here
backgroundWorker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(backgroundWorker_DoWork);
backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
public delegate void DoUIWorkHandler();
public void backgroundWorker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
// You must check here if your are executing on a background thread.
// UI operations are only allowed on the main application thread
if (someControlOnMyForm.InvokeRequired)
{
// This is how you force your logic to be called on the main
// application thread
someControlOnMyForm.Invoke(new
DoUIWorkHandler(_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap);
}
else
{
_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap()
}
}
}

You should remove the while(true), you are adding infinite event handlers and invoking them infinite times.

You can use the RunWorkerCompleted event on the backgroundWorker class to define what should be done when the background task has completed. So you should do the database call in the DoWork handler, and then update the interface in the RunWorkerCompleted handler, something like this:
BackgroundWorker bgw = new BackgroundWorker();
bgw.DoWork += (o, e) => { longRunningTask(); }
bgw.RunWorkerCompleted += (o, e) => {
if(e.Error == null && !e.Cancelled)
{
_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap();
}
}
bgw.RunWorkerAsync();

In addition to previous comments, take a look at www.albahari.com/threading - best doc on threading you will ever find. It will teach you how to use the BackgroundWorker properly.
You should update the GUI when the BackgroundWorker fires Completed event (which is invoked on UI thread to make it easy for you, so that you don't have to do Control.Invoke yourself).

Here's a source code pattern you can use based on some WinForms example code, but you can apply it for WPF as well very easily. In this example, I am redirecting output to a Console which I then use to let the background worker write some messages to a textbox while it is processing.
It consists of:
A helper class TextBoxStreamWriter used to redirect console output to a textbox
A background worker writing to the redirected console
A progress bar which needs to be reset after completion of background worker
Some text boxes (txtPath and txtResult), and a "Start" button
In other words, there is some background task which needs to interact with the UI. Now I am going to show how that is done.
From the context of the background task, you need to use Invoke to access any UI element. I believe the simplest way to do that is to use lambda expression syntax, like
progressBar1.Invoke((Action) (() =>
{ // inside this context, you can safely access the control
progressBar1.Style = ProgressBarStyle.Continuous;
}));
To update the ProgressBar, a local method like
private void UpdateProgress(int value)
{
progressBar1.Invoke((Action)(() => { progressBar1.Value = value; }));
}
helps. It is passing the value parameter to the progress bar as a closure.
This is the helper class TextBoxStreamWriter, which is used to redirect console output:
public class TextBoxStreamWriter : TextWriter
{
TextBox _output = null;
public TextBoxStreamWriter(TextBox output)
{
_output = output;
}
public override void WriteLine(string value)
{
// When character data is written, append it to the text box.
// using Invoke so it works in a different thread as well
_output.Invoke((Action)(() => _output.AppendText(value+"\r\n")));
}
}
You need to use it in the form load event as follows (where txtResult is a textbox, to which the output will be redirected):
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Instantiate the writer and redirect the console out
var _writer = new TextBoxStreamWriter(txtResult);
Console.SetOut(_writer);
}
There is also a button on the form which starts the background worker, it passes a path to it:
private void btnStart_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerAsync(txtPath.Text);
}
This is the workload of the background worker, note how it uses the console to output messages to the textbox (because of the redirection that was set up earlier):
private void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
var selectedPath = e.Argument as string;
Console.Out.WriteLine("Processing Path:"+selectedPath);
// ...
}
The variable selectedPath consists of the path that was passed to the backgroundWorker1 earlier via the parameter txtPath.Text, it is being accessed via e.Argument.
If you need to reset some controls afterwards, do it in the following way (as already mentioned above):
private void backgroundWorker1_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
progressBar1.Invoke((Action) (() =>
{
progressBar1.MarqueeAnimationSpeed = 0;
progressBar1.Style = ProgressBarStyle.Continuous;
}));
}
In this example, after completion, a progress bar is being reset.
Important: Whenever you access a GUI control, use Invoke as I did in the examples above.
Using Lambda's makes it easy, as you could see in the code.
And here's the complete example, which runs in LinqPad 6 (just copy and paste it into an empty C# Program query) - I decided to use LinqPad this time so you can learn something new, because you all know how to create a new Windows Forms project in Visual Studio (and if you still want to do so, just copy the events below and drag and drop the controls to the form):
// see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/27566468/1016343
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Windows.Forms;
BackgroundWorker backgroundWorker1 = new System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker();
ProgressBar progressBar1 = new ProgressBar() { Text = "Progress", Width = 250, Height=20, Top=10, Left=0 };
TextBox txtPath = new TextBox() { Text =#"C:\temp\", Width = 100, Height=20, Top=30, Left=0 };
TextBox txtResult = new TextBox() { Text = "", Width = 200, Height=250, Top=70, Left=0, Multiline=true, Enabled=false };
Button btnStart = new Button() { Text = "Start", Width = 100, Height=30, Top=320, Left=0 };
void Main()
{
// see: https://www.linqpad.net/CustomVisualizers.aspx
// Instantiate the writer and redirect the console out
var _writer = new TextBoxStreamWriter(txtResult);
Console.SetOut(_writer);
// wire up events
btnStart.Click += (object sender, EventArgs e) => btnStart_Click(sender, e);
backgroundWorker1.DoWork += (object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e) => backgroundWorker1_DoWork(sender, e);
backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerCompleted += (object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
=> backgroundWorker1_RunWorkerCompleted(sender, e);
using var frm = new Form() {Text="Form", Width = 300, Height=400, Top=0, Left=0};
frm.Controls.Add(progressBar1);
frm.Controls.Add(txtPath);
frm.Controls.Add(txtResult);
frm.Controls.Add(btnStart);
// display controls
frm.ShowDialog();
}
private void btnStart_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerAsync(txtPath.Text);
}
private void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
InitProgress();
var selectedPath = e.Argument as string;
Console.Out.WriteLine("Processing Path: " + selectedPath);
UpdateProgress(0); Thread.Sleep(300); UpdateProgress(30); Thread.Sleep(300);
UpdateProgress(50); Thread.Sleep(300);
Console.Out.WriteLine("Done.");
// ...
}
private void UpdateProgress(int value)
{
progressBar1.Invoke((Action)(() =>
{
progressBar1.Value = value;
}));
}
private void InitProgress()
{
progressBar1.Invoke((Action)(() =>
{
progressBar1.MarqueeAnimationSpeed = 0;
progressBar1.Style = ProgressBarStyle.Continuous;
}));
}
private void backgroundWorker1_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
UpdateProgress(100); // always show 100% when done
}
// You can define other methods, fields, classes and namespaces here
public class TextBoxStreamWriter : TextWriter
{
TextBox _output = null;
public TextBoxStreamWriter(TextBox output)
{
_output = output;
}
public override Encoding Encoding => throw new NotImplementedException();
public override void WriteLine(string value)
{
// When character data is written, append it to the text box.
// using Invoke so it works in a different thread as well
_output.Invoke((Action)(() => _output.AppendText(value + "\r\n")));
}
}

The if-statement in #Lee's answer should look like:
bgw.RunWorkerCompleted += (o, e) => {
if(e.Error == null && !e.Cancelled)
{
_userController.UpdateUsersOnMap();
}
}
...if you want to invoke UpdateUsersOnMap(); when there are no errors and BgWorker hasn't been cancelled.