I would like to learn the most proper way to go about this: I have a Listview in my GameView that is bound to an ObservableCollection<Adventurer>. Upon double-clicking on a cell, I need a new window (or something else if anything is more appropriate) to open and display data about the correct Adventurer according to the cell. So far I haven't been able to. This is what I have so far (it's not much, but nothing I've tried has worked).
The trigger/command in my ListView in GameView.xaml
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="MouseDoubleClick">
<cmd:EventToCommand Command="{Binding Mode=OneWay, Path=ShowAdvCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=AdvListView,
Path=SelectedItem}"
PassEventArgsToCommand="True" />
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
And the command in GameViewModel.cs
ShowAdvCommand = new RelayCommand<Adventurer>(p =>
{
System.Windows.MessageBox.Show(p.Name);
});
The MessageBox is just there to confirm that Eventtocommand was working.
I essentially need a container that will take in the correct Adventurer as a parameter after double-clicking a Listview cell and allow me to display data specific to that instance. I would also prefer to stick to something MVVM-friendly.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Update: I may have made a little progress:
GameViewModel:
ShowAdvCommand = new RelayCommand<Adventurer>(p =>
{
AdventurerView adv = new AdventurerView(p);
adv.Show();
});
AdventurerView:
public partial class AdventurerView : Window
{
Adventurer adv;
public AdventurerView(Adventurer adv)
{
this.adv = adv;
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Now I need to figure out how to make this work in XAML, databinding and such.
Update: ...and then I realized that this completely goes against MVVM. Does anybody have any advice?
Update: Would MVVM Light's messenger help me here? I've been tinkering with it but haven't gotten it to work.
Update: This question is still up in the air. I tried the Prism approach but there was some conflict between Prism and MVVM Light that caused more trouble than it was worth. I'm open to any ideas that are compatible with MVVM Light and the MVVM pattern in general.
Update: Also, I would like to do this in a way where multiple popups can exist concurrently, if possible.
In a similar situation, I've used MvvmLight's Messenger, and it worked really well. On double click, send a message from your viewmodel containing the entity you want to pass. Somewhere you will need to register to receive the message, depending on how you have set up your views and viewmodels to be activated.
You could register to receive the message in your MainPage.xaml, and either pass the entity straight to the view's constructor, or access the view's DataContext via an interface to pass the entity, depending on whether you're using a viewmodel in you childwindow. E.g.
AdventurerView adv = new AdventurerView();
IEntityViewModel vm = adv.DataContext as IEntityViewModel;
vm.SetCurrentEntity(entity);
adv.Show();
The IEntityViewModel might look like the following:
public interface IEntityViewModel<T> where T : class
{
void SetCurrentEntity(T entity);
}
The viewmodel would implement this interface:
public class AdventurerViewModel : IEntityViewModel<Adventurer>
{
public void SetCurrentEntity(Adventurer entity)
{
// Do what you need to with the entity - depending on your needs,
// you might keep it intact in case editing is cancelled, and just
// work on a copy.
}
}
As you've pointed out, proper MVVM wouldn't instantiate the view and pass the view model in through the constructor. You'd be better off binding the ViewModel to the View and there are many different ways of doing it.
One pattern that has emerged is a concept known as a "screen conductor". This is a top level ViewModel or controller that handles which ViewModel represents the main window. Again, many different ways to do this. For example, the ViewModel could raise a standard .net event that the Screen Conductor handles. You could use an message passing system like Caliburn.Micro's EventAggregator or MVVM Light's Messenger. I think MEFedMVVM also has an event aggregator to accomplish this as well.
Caliburn.Micro also has a WindowManager that you can pass in your ViewModel and have it automatically find the corresponding View and manage the window lifetime.
Lots of options. Find the one that works the best for you.
This is a nice case for Prism's InteractionRequest. Essentially, you have an InteractionRequest object on your ViewModel that you raise when you double click (inside your double click command). Your view has an Action on it that handles the Raised event and shows the new view. You pass a new ViewModel to that interaction and that's the DataContext for the window that'll display. Here's some good information to get you started. This is how I display all child windows in my application.
Related
I just can't figure this out. So I will try describe my problem best I can.
I am building application using MVVM pattern. I have user control AAAView with viewmodel AAAViewModel that is used to fill data class CDataClass. I also have main window MainView and its viewmodel MainViewModel. Next I have window DialogView with DialogViewModel.
So now MainViewModel (that has its own user control) creates DialogViewModel (with another instance of user control). How can I transfer data in CDataClass between these two user controls? I tried to create property in AAAViewModel that would hold instance of MainViewModel or DialogViewModel so I can pass data to it but I get stuck because I couldn't make it as dependency property.
My goal is to make user control that can be used in different views which can have different data in underlaying CDataClass.
Just to clarify... I am using user control as <views:GeneralInfoView Grid.Row="0" /> and don't know how to share data between two different instances of the same user control in different views. Any point to some pattern or method would be much appreciate.
Thank you for help.
I don't think it's ideal that you've got your application architecture diagrammed as relationships among views; I think a better way to think about it is as a set of relationships among viewmodels, with the views hanging off that tree as needed. When you think about it that way, "how does data get passed" gets a lot simpler. A view is just a conduit between a viewmodel and the user. You don't design a house as a set of windows and telephones and then try to figure out the floor plan from that. You start with what the house does and how people will live in it.
So this is easy:
Some viewmodels have an AAViewModel property. There may be all kinds of simple or complicated views on those viewmodels; if a view wants to let the user edit the viewmodel's AAViewModel stuff, then it includes an AAView bound appropriately to the viewmodel's AAViewModel. Your MainViewModel and DialogViewModel are both big complicated interactive views that want to let somebody edit their vm's AAViewModel stuff.
If MainViewModel is DialogViewModel's parent, or created a temporary instance of DialogViewModel just to put in a modal dialog, then MainViewModel would show the dialog, and have a look at dialogVM.AAVM.CData.IsDirty to decide what to do with it. Or maybe it gives dialogVM.AAVM a new CDataClass instance before showing the dialog (maybe a clone of its own instance), and if ShowModel() returns true, then it does something with dialogVM.AAVM.CData.
The point is that once your viewmodels are driving everything, it becomes relatively simple for them to communicate with each other. Parent-child is easy: Parent gives stuff to the child and looks at what the child brings back. A viewmodel can subscribe to another viewmodel's PropertyChanged event; a parent viewmodel can monitor its children; when something happens on a child, the parent can decide whether to update a sibling. In general, children should not know anything at all about their parents; this makes it much easier to reuse child viewmodels in disparate contexts. It's up to parents to decide what to do with that information.
All AAViewModel knows is that somebody handed him a copy of CDataClass; he updates his public properties accordingly. Then somebody else (probably AAView, but he doesn't know) hands him some changes by setting his properties; he updates his CDataClass instance accordingly. After a while, unknown to him, one viewmodel or another comes and looks at that CDataClass.
And communication between views and viewmodels happens via bindings.
UPDATE
It turns out that you're creating viewmodels in your views, and as a result you have no idea how the parent can get to them. And now you know why it's not a good idea to create child view viewmodels that way.
Here's how you do child view/viewmodels in the viewmodel-centric design I described above:
First, get rid of whatever you're doing to create the child viewmodels inside the view.
Second, create a DataTemplate for the child viewmodel type. This should go in a resource dictionary which is merged into the resources in App.xaml, but it's so simple that it won't kill you if you get lazy and just paste it into the Resources of the two different views where it's used.
I don't know what your namespace declarations look like. I'm going to assume that views are in something called xmlns:view="...", and viewmodels are in something called xmlns:vm="...".
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:AAAViewModel}">
<view:AAAView />
</DataTemplate>
Now, you can assign an AAAViewModel to the ContentProperty of any control that inherits from ContentControl (and that's most of them), and the template will be instantiated. That means that XAML will create an AAAView for you and assign that instance of AAAViewModel to the DataContext property of the AAAView that it just created.
So let's create a child AAAViewModel next, and then we'll show it in the UI.
public class DialogViewModel
{
// You can create this in DialogViewModel's constructor if you need to
// give it parameters that won't be known until then.
private AAAViewModel _aaavm = new AAAViewModel();
public AAAViewModel AAAVM
{
get { return _aaavm; }
protected set {
_aaavm = value;
OnPropertyChanged(nameof(AAAVM));
}
}
And now we can display AAAVM in DialogView:
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<ContentControl
Content="{Binding AAAVM}"
Grid.Row="0"
/>
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical" Grid.Row="1">
<!-- Other stuff -->
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
Now how does MainViewModel get in touch with a DialogViewModel? In the case of dialogs, since they have a finite lifespan, it's not actually a big deal to let them create their own viewmodels. You can do it either way. I generally lean towards having it create its own as in the second example below.
Not quite the same, but close. First, once again, get rid of whatever you're doing where the dialog creates its own viewmodel.
MainViewModel.cs
public CDataClass CDC { /* you know the drill */ }
public void ShowDialog()
{
var dvm = new DialogViewModel();
// Maybe this isn't what you want; I don't know what CDataClass does.
// But I'm assuming it has a copy constructor.
dvm.AAAVM.CDC = new CDataClass(this.CDC);
if (DialogView.ShowDialog(dvm).GetValueOrDefault())
{
CDC = dvm.CDC;
}
}
Note that this next one is view codebehind, not viewmodel.
DialogView.xaml.cs
public static bool? ShowDialog(DialogViewModel dvm)
{
var vw = new DialogView() { DataContext = dvm };
return vw.ShowDialog();
}
Now, you could let the dialog continue creating its own viewmodel; in that case you would give it a public property like this:
public DialogViewModel ViewModel => (DialogViewModel)DataContext;
And a ShowDialog method like this:
DialogView.xaml.cs
public static bool? ShowDialog(CDataClass cdc)
{
var dlg = new DialogView();
dlg.ViewModel.AAAVVM.CDC = cdc;
return dlg.ShowDialog();
}
And then the parent could interact with it like this instead:
MainViewModel.cs
public void ShowDialog()
{
var cdcClone = new CDataClass(this.CDC);
if (DialogView.ShowDialog(cdcClone).GetValueOrDefault())
{
CDC = cdcClone;
}
}
Nice and tidy.
If that dialog isn't modal, make the dialog viewmodel a private member of MainViewModel, and have MainViewModel subscribe to events on the dialog viewmodel to keep abreast of what the dialog is doing. Whenever the user updates the dialog's copy of CDataClass, the dialog would raise DataClassUpdated, and MainViewModel would have a handler for that event that sniffs at _dialogViewModel.AAAVM.CDC, and decides what to do with it. We can get into example code for that if necessary.
So now you can see what I mean by building everything in terms of parent/child viewmodels, and stuffing them into views when and as appropriate.
I am trying to learn MVVM and using MVVM light with my phone application but I am kinda confused on how to access some information.
I am trying to not to use code behind events as much as possible as that does not seem to be the true MVVM way but I ran into a problem I don't know how to do.
I am using Google authentication and I am checking the Naviagted Event after each browser load.
public ICommand BrowserNavigated
{
get
{
return new RelayCommand<NavigationEventArgs>(e =>
{
var d = e;
var a = d;
});
}
}
However I also need the actual object control(I want to access the html that page is spitting back out) but I don't know how to get it.
private void wbGoogle_Navigated(object sender, System.Windows.Navigation.NavigationEventArgs e)
{
var d = e;
var d2 = d;
}
in the above code I could just cast "sender" to a web browser object but with me doing it the MVVM way I don't know how to access it.
Should I have another property or something for WebBrowser in my ViewModel?
In MVVM, code behind is allowed, but perhaps bindings are preferred. However, having GUI controls / events (hard coupling) is not allowed.
There may be ways to avoid code behind, but if you have to handle an event, get the data out of the event and set the property on your ViewModel in your code behind, then that is a better way to do it than adding UI code to your ViewModel which is clearly not keeping with MVVM.
Perhaps you can create some sort of EventTrigger which sets a property for a webbrowser that you can databind to create a re-usable Trigger that you can set in your XAML? (There's probably lots of ways to be clever on how to avoid code behind and create reusable code)
Your ViewModel should be totally unaware of the View or particular controls. Whether or not to keep the codebehind of your view clear or not, is a matter of religion.
If you want to keep it clean, which I recommend whenever possible, there are a number of concepts, which allow you to do so.
First, you need to design your View/ViewModel relationship in a way, that all data relevant for the ViewModel is present 'at all times' in the ViewModel or can be passed to the ViewModel via CommandParameter of a ICommand. In your case, if the page of the Webbrowser is controlled by (i.e. might be set from) the ViewModel, the ViewModel should hold a property, which is bound to the Source property of the browser. If the ViewModel just needs to 'know' the Uri when the BrowserNavigated is executed, just pass it as a CommandParameter.
Secondly, for your particular case, you want to execute a command on the ViewModel, when the Navigated event of the WebBrowser is raised. As always, there are several options. I prefer the option which comes with the framework: The EventTrigger in System.Windows.Interactivity allows you to relay any event of any control to commands via bindings.
This way, the Uri can be set from the ViewModel:
<WebBrowser Source="{Binding BrowserPageUri}" Name="wbGoogle">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="Navigated" >
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding BrowserNavigated}" />
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</WebBrowser>
This way, you can handle the Uri as parameter of the command:
<WebBrowser Name="wbGoogle">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="Navigated" >
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding BrowserNavigated}"
CommandParameter="{Binding Source, ElementName=wbGoogle}" />
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</WebBrowser>
Of course, this only lets you access the Uri of the page in the WebBrowser, not the page itself. If you need to bind to the page object itself, you need to extend the WebBrowser, with an attached property, that makes the Document property bindable. This is quite straight-forward:
Attached Document property for WebBrowser
After attaching this property to your WebBrowser, you can define the bindings of the WebBrowser just as in the above code, just with the attached property, instead of the Source property.
Note, that the syntax for binding to an attached property would be:
{Binding Path=(WebBrowserExtentions.Document)}
MVVM can be great for data binding and by using toolkits like MVVMLight, events that deal with user interactions can also be neatly dealt with.
However sometimes, controls like WebBrowserControl or ApplicationBar present a challenge to this. They can be difficult or impossible to bind with event triggers, or have complex behaviours. In these cases it is simpler if you handle the process of getting information from the control in your View code behind and send a simple message down to the VM.
Sure you could create an event that updates a property, write an Attached Property, or maybe use a 3rd party library; and there are cases that warrant that approach.
In your example I personally would use code-behind to handle the Navigated event and send down a message (or a method call on your VM) containing everything the VM wants in one go.
For instance:
private void wbGoogle_Navigated(object sender, System.Windows.Navigation.NavigationEventArgs e)
{
var vm = (TypeOfMyViewModel) this.DataContext;
//... read your HTML, get URL etc ...
vm.WebBrowserNavigatedTo(url, html, loadTime);
}
Similarly if an event raised from your VM would cause many things to happen in your View there comes a point where it is simpler to send a message or event to your View and let the View update the controls in code.
The key thing is keep the roles of MVVM distinct, e.g. to avoid a direct dependency of the ViewModel on the View. Interfaces can help here well as Messaging that comes with MVVMLight and its alternatives.
I am currently trying to design an application that loads viewmodels through MEF imports.
So far so good, I navigate from viewmodel to viewmodel, having loaded each vm datatemplate through dictionaries.
Each time I navigate, I modify the content of the main contentPresenter in my Shell (MainWindow).
One of the viewmodel allows me to display a WindowFormHost for an activeX control (such as acrobat reader for example). Since WindowFormHost does not allow binding, I created the windowFormHost in the viewmodel and binded it to a ContentPresenter in the view.
And here is where it fails : when coming back to the same viewmodel, the view is created again... throwing a “Element is already the child of another element.” error.
How can I prevent that ? Should I unload WindowFormHost when view is reloaded ? Or Can I keep view instances so that I keep only one instance for each view and let data binding update controls ? (It looks better for memory consumption).
Thanks for your help !
[EDIT]
Loaded dictionary :
<DataTemplate x:Shared="False" DataType="{x:Type vm:DAVPDC3DVIAControlViewModel}">
<vw:MyUserControl />
</DataTemplate>
View :
<DockPanel>
<ContentControl Name="WFH3DVia" Content="{Binding Path=Control3DVIA, Mode=OneWay} </ContentControl>"
<!--<WindowsFormsHost Name="WFH3DVia"></WindowsFormsHost>-->
</DockPanel>
VM (singleton, mef module) :
[Export(typeof(IDAVPDC3DVIAControl))]
public partial class DAVPDC3DVIAControlViewModel : ViewModelBase, IViewModel, IPartImportsSatisfiedNotification
VM (main window)
[Export]
public class MainWindowViewModel : ViewModelBase, IPartImportsSatisfiedNotification
// CurrentUC binds main widow view to controller active viewmodel
public IViewModel CurrentUC
{
get
{
return myAddinManager.CurrentVM;
}
}
Main view :
Controler (displays module on event) :
private void ModuleReadyEventAction(string iModuleName)
{
if (null != this.Modules && this.Modules.Count() > 0)
{
foreach (var item in Modules)
{
IBaseModule ibasemodule = item as IBaseModule;
if (null != ibasemodule)
{
Type tp = ibasemodule.GetType();
if (0 == tp.Name.CompareTo(iModuleName))
{
CurrentVM = ibasemodule.GetViewModel();
break;
}
}
}
}
}
I'm also working on a project in WPF using Prism v4 and MVVM (except I'm using Unity). I also have at least two controls that I need to use which are Windows Forms controls that must be hosted in a WindowsFormsHost. Let me explain my thoughts on the process..
It seems to me, that you are trying to avoid any code in your View's code behind. That's the only reason I can think of that you are moving your WindowsFormsHost into your ViewModel. I think that this is fundamentally the wrong approach. The WindowsFormsHost exists for the reason of displaying a graphical Windows Forms control. Therefore, it belongs in the view!
Now, I understand the appeal of DataBindings. Trust me, I've wanted to able to DataBind many parts of my WindowForms control. Of course, to accept a WPF data binding the property must be a dependency property on a dependency object. The easiest solution, which is not unreasonable, is to simply add the code to configure your windows forms control in the code behind for your view. Adding your UI logic into your ViewModel is an actual violation of the MVVM design pattern, while adding code behind is not. (And in some cases is the best approach)
I've seen possible hacks to try to get around this limitation. Including using "proxies" which inject a databinding, or perhaps extending WindowsFormsHost and adding DependencyProperties which wrap a specific hosted control's properties, or writing classes using reflection and trying to throw in windows forms bindings. However, nothing I've seen can solve the problem completely. For example, my windows forms control can contain other graphical components, and those components would need to support binding as well.
The simplest approach is to simply synchronize your view with your viewmodel in your view's code behind. Your view model can keep the file or document that is open, filename, title, etc., but leave the display and display related controls up to the View.
Last, let me comment more directly on your question. I would need to see how you are registering your View and ViewModel with the MEF Container and how you are navigating to understand why you are receiving that error. It would seem to me that either your view or view model is getting created more than once, while the other is not. Are these registered as singleton types? Regardless, I stand by what I said about not including the WindowsFormsHost in your ViewModel.
I'm using Prism and my views implement IConfirmNavigationRequest in order to enable them to perform validations and cancel the navigation if required.
My problem is that I have several views which don't use MVVM, and define DataContext = this. Doing so causes Prism to call my view's ConfirmNavigationRequest() twice, which means I ask for the user's response twice.
Basically what's going on is this:
Prism checks if the view implements IConfirmNavigationRequest and calls ConfirmNavigationRequest() on it if it does.
The user is asked whether he'd like to continue.
The user clicks OK and ConfirmNavigationRequest() returns true.
Prism checks if the viewmodel (in my case, it's the view again) implements IConfirmNavigationRequest and calls ConfirmNavigationRequest() on it if it does.
The user is asked again whether he'd like to continue.
As you can see, Prism asks my view for confirmation twice because it queries both the view and the viewmodel.
So my question is, how can I prevent this from happening or how can I detect which call is which so I can ignore one of them? I thought about investigating the continuationCallback parameter, but I don't like this solution so much since it's not unlikely it'll break in the next versions of Prism.
The best solution I got so far is the one I got from DCherubini at Prism's forum, which suggests that I won't set the view's DataContext on my UserControl, but use an inner element that will hold the view, and set the DataContext for it instead:
<UserControl>
<Grid x:Name="grid">
...
</Grid>
</UserControl>
grid.DataContext = this;
instead of
<UserControl x:Name="uc">
</UserControl>
uc.DataContext = this;
This should work, but it means I need to change each view individually. A solution that doesn't require making changes to the views would be nicer.
In a MVVM WPF application.
How do you set a second windows parent from the ViewModel?
example:
view1 -- viewModel1
viewModel1's command calls:
var view2 = new view2
view2.Owner = <----This is the problem area. How do I get view1 as the owner here from the viewModel?
view2.Show()
EDIT:
See accepted answer below, then read the following edit.
I'am using MVVM light -> http://mvvmlight.codeplex.com/ (awesome btw)
The baked-in messaging system is great. I am now sending a message from the viewmodel to my view telling it to show another window.
For the message I'am currently using a string with a switch statement in the main view to determine what view to open; however I may tinker with the tokens that also are part of MVVM light toolkit.
Thank you!
In my opinion, opening a new window is the responsibility of the View, not of the ViewModel. Personally, I would use the same approach as used for displaying a dialog box (this was discussed in this forum already):
Have the ViewModel send a Message to the View requesting that it opens a new Window.
(alternatively) use an IDialogService or whatever you want to call it which you pass to the ViewModel's constructor. This service will be in charge of opening the Window (or of delegating this task to the View).
This way, you keep a clean separation of concerns and your VM remains testable (you can unit test that the request to open the new WIndow has been sent, but you couldn't test that the window has been, indeed, open).
Does that make sense?
Cheers,
Laurent
From your viewmodel call
Messenger.Default.Send<NotificationMessage>(new NotificationMessage("Open Window"));
And from your view's codebehind (a view that call the second
view) easily write this in the constructor:
Messenger.Default.Register<NotificationMessage>(this, ReplyToMessage);
And also write this method in the view's codebehind:
private void ReplyToMessage(NotificationMessage msg)
{
if (msg.Notification == "Open Window")
{
SecondWindow win = new SecondWindow();
win.ShowDialog();
}
}
I don't have an answer of my own but here's a few links to things I've been looking at lately that might help. I'll also be interested in anything others suggest.
As I understand it, the key thing is, you shouldn't be creating Views from within a View Model if possible, so you need a means of communicating what you need in a loosely coupled fashion.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/XAMLDialog.aspx
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/architecture/MVVM_Dialogs.aspx
Handling Dialogs in WPF with MVVM
You can do in this way like you need to create some events and register those in view and call these in view model.and open that pop up window.
Like This example
public class Mainclass : MainView
{
public delegate abc RegisterPopUp(abc A);
public RegisterPopUp POpUpEvent;
public RelayCommand ShowCommand { private set; get; }
public void ShowCommand()
{
ShowCommand("Your parameter");
}
}
inside the view
MainView mn = new MainView();
Register the event here like mn.POpUpEvent += then click on tab button double time and in registers popup method write the code for opening the pop up window.
Prism-Event Aggrigator is good approach, where we can create independent module without dependency. first viewmodel will publish event and then another view or view or viewmodel can subscribe that event from event aggrigator.
in this case Unity container can also use to inject one viewmodel in to another with dependency injection.