We Keep Coding

UDP not receiving updated values

My udp class is not receiving the updated value from the stream. Device sends data continuously and when any alarm activated it add the code in stream and sends the updated value but my class is not receiving the updated value unless I restart the program.
here is my UDPListener class.
public class
{
public static int PORT_NUMBER { get; set; }
public string IpAddress { get; set; }
private readonly UdpClient udp;
public event Action<object, EventArgs> msgChanged;
IAsyncResult ar_ = null;
public UDPListener(string ipaddr, int port)
{
IpAddress = ipaddr;
PORT_NUMBER = port;
udp = new UdpClient(PORT_NUMBER);
Start();
}
public void Start()
{
StartListening();
}
public void Stop()
{
try
{
udp.Close();
}
catch { /* not necessary */ }
}
private void StartListening()
{
ar_ = udp.BeginReceive(Receive, new object());
}
private void Receive(IAsyncResult ar)
{
try
{
Thread.Sleep(150);
IPEndPoint ip = new IPEndPoint(IPAddress.Parse(IpAddress), PORT_NUMBER);
byte[] bytes = udp.EndReceive(ar, ref ip);
string message = Encoding.ASCII.GetString(bytes);
//raise event..
if (message.StartsWith("S"))
if (msgChanged != null)
msgChanged(message, EventArgs.Empty);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Error in UDPListner..." + ex.Message);
}
finally
{
StartListening();
}
}
}
Now what is happening when the program starts it will receive data "S0000.." but when alarm raises data changes to "S8000..etc" but this class continuously receiving the same "S000.." data unless I restart the class.
When I run the udp listener in while loop its works perfectly fine, it receives the updated stream and changes when alarm goes off.
here is the code for while loop udp.
while (!StopRunning)
{
Thread.Sleep(150);
udp = new UdpClient(PORT_NUMBER, AddressFamily.InterNetwork);
var ep = default(IPEndPoint);
var data = udp.Receive(ref ep);
udp.Close();
string msg = Encoding.ASCII.GetString(data);
if (msgChanged != null)
msgChanged(msg, EventArgs.Empty);
}
But I cannot make use of while loop because I have to fit this program in window service.

The main difference in your UDPListener and while loop is that in loop you are creating udp variable each time you are connecting to the UDP:
udp = new UdpClient(PORT_NUMBER, AddressFamily.InterNetwork);
In Receive(IAsyncResult ar) you only connect with the same client, so you still have the same data.
I think that you can rewrite your class something like this:
private void StartListening()
{
udp = new UdpClient(PORT_NUMBER, AddressFamily.InterNetwork);
ar_ = udp.BeginReceive(Receive, new object());
}
Make sure that you're disposing the udp connection after receive with Close() method:
byte[] bytes = udp.EndReceive(ar, ref ip);
udp.Close();

C# TcpClient cannot connect

I create a class which connects with other computer in LAN. When I induce a method Connect first time all is ok, but after work class the variable lose a reference to this object.
But if I try do create this object again and I induce a method Connect I have an error which is saying "Only one using each socket adress(protocol / network address / port) is permitted"
this error is when I try to do
partner.Connect(partnerIPEndPoint);.
What is bad in my class? I would appreciate if anybody could help me.
Thanks in advance.
Here is my class:
using System;
using System.Net;
using System.Net.Sockets;
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace AudioNetwork
{
class ConnectToServer : IDisposable
{
public int BeepAmonut { get; set; }
public int Speed { get; set; }
public IPAddress MyIPAddress { get; set; }
public IPAddress PartnerIPAddress { get; set; }
private NetworkStream stream;
private TcpClient partner;
public void Connect()
{
IPEndPoint myIPEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(MyIPAddress, 800);
IPEndPoint partnerIPEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(PartnerIPAddress, 800);
partner = new TcpClient(myIPEndPoint);
partner.Connect(partnerIPEndPoint);
stream = partner.GetStream();
Messanger(stream);
}
protected virtual void Messanger(NetworkStream myStream)
{
byte[] data = { 2, 1 };
myStream.Write(data, 0, data.Length);
Play(2000);
}
public void Play(int time)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
while (sw.ElapsedMilliseconds <= 2100)
{
if (sw.ElapsedMilliseconds >= time)
{
break;
}
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
stream.Dispose();
stream.Close();
partner.Client.Dispose();
partner.Close();
}
}
class ConnectToClient : ConnectToServer
{
protected override void Messanger(NetworkStream myStream)
{
byte[] data = new byte[256];
int bytes = myStream.Read(data, 0, data.Length);
if (data[0] == 2)
{
Play(1980);
}
}
}
}

You assign a hardcoded port to the local endpoint, and don't close it.
When you open the first connection, you have a local socket on port 800 connected to the remote socket at port 800.
You then forget to close this connection (as you never call Dispose on steam or partner - I don't see your Dispose function being called anywhere)
When you're trying to open the second connection on the local port 800, it is already taken by the fist connection, which leads to the error you're encountering.
The solution is to let the OS assign an automatic port number for the local socket. That way:
When you open the first connection, you have a local socket on an auto-assigned port number connected to the remote socket at port 800.
When you open the second connection, even if the first one isn't closed yet, the OS will assign a different port number to the second socket and connect it to the remote socket at port 800.
In code, that would be simply:
partner = new TcpClient();
And get rid of all that MyIPAddress stuff.

TCP listener not working when it is behind a load balancer

I have a TCP listener in a windows service that listens for any incoming TCP requests on a specific port and processes the message. It works fine when it is accessed directly. But once this is running behind a load balancer (in intranet), then it is not accepting any requests. I get errors like "unable to connect to remote server" OR "operation timed out". After a while the service terminates with "out of memory" exception. Please let me know what could be the reason for this. Pasting the code below. I even tried async mode as well (to avoid explicit thread launching). but that didn't help.
public class SampleListener: IDisposable
{
public delegate void JobRecieved(HttpMessage msg);
public event JobRecieved OnJobRecieved;
#region Property
private TcpListener _tcpListener;
private Thread _listenerThread;
public int Port { get; private set; }
public string Url
{
get
{
return new UriBuilder { Scheme = "http", Port = Port, Host = Dns.GetHostName() }.ToString();
}
}
#endregion
public SampleListener(int port)
{
Port = port;
}
~SampleListener()
{
DisposeImpl(false);
}
public void Start()
{
_tcpListener = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Any, Port);
_tcpListener.Start();
_listenerThread = new Thread(ListenCallback);
_listenerThread.Start();
}
public void ListenCallback()
{
try
{
while (true)
{
using (TcpClient client = _tcpListener.AcceptTcpClient())
using (var clientStream = client.GetStream())
{
var msg = new HttpMessage();
msg.Receive(clientStream);
SendOKResponse(client, "");
OnJobRecieved(msg);
client.Close();
}
}
}
catch (System.Net.Sockets.SocketException e)
{
// Expected, TcpClient.Stop called
}
catch (System.Threading.ThreadAbortException)
{
// Expected, thread going away
}
catch (System.IO.IOException)
{
// Expected, shutdown while reading
}
}
private void SendOKResponse(TcpClient tcpClient, String responseBody)
{
var response = new HttpMessage
{
Status = "200",
Reason = "OK",
Version = "HTTP/1.1"
};
response.Send(tcpClient.GetStream(), responseBody);
}
public void Shutdown()
{
lock (this)
{
if (_listenerThread != null)
{
_listenerThread.Abort();
_listenerThread = null;
}
if (_tcpListener != null)
{
_tcpListener.Stop();
_tcpListener.Server.Close();
_tcpListener = null;
}
}
}
#region IDisposable Members
private void DisposeImpl(Boolean bDisposing)
{
lock (this)
{
Shutdown();
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
DisposeImpl(true);
}
#endregion
}

That's because NLB on Windows needs your application be a clustered one by default. And if it is not (which it is your case) you must use Sticky Sessions. Apparently your NLB is not using Sticky Sessions so requests may travel to different servers on each pass. That's why you get those exceptions (Take a look at this).
That happened to me on one of my own projects (a high performance TCP Server - the opposite of what you are doing).

TCPIP networking with C#

HI everyone,
I'm going to be writing some code that has to listen for TCPIP messages coming from GSM mobile phones over GPRS. In the fullness of time, I see this as running on a Virtual Private Server, and it could well be processing multiple messages every second.
I'm a bit of a network programming virgin, so I've done a bit of research on the internet, and read a few tutorials. The approach I am considering at the moment is a windows service using sockets to monitor the port. If my understanding is correct, I need one socket to listen for connections from clients, and each time someone tries to connect with the port I will be passed another socket with which to communicate with them? Does this sound about right to more experienced ears?
I'm planning on using asynchronous communication, but on of the bigger design questions is whether to use threading or not. Threading isn't something I've really played with, and I am aware of a number of pitfalls - race conditions and debugging problems being but two.
If I avoid threads, I know I have to supply an object that acts as an identifier for a particular conversation. I was thinking GUIDs for this - any opinions?
Thanks in advance for any responses...
Martin

Starting from .net framework 2.0 SP1 there are some changings in socket libraries related to asyncronous sockets.
All multithreading used under the hood. We have no need to use multithreading manually (we don't need to use even ThreadPool explicitly). All what we do - using BeginAcceptSocket for starting accepting new connections, and using SocketAsyncEventArgs after accepting new connection .
Short implementation:
//In constructor or in method Start
var tcpServer = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Any, port);
tcpServer.Start();
tcpServer.BeginAcceptSocket(EndAcceptSocket, tcpServer);
//In EndAcceptSocket
Socket sock= lister.EndAcceptSocket(asyncResult);
var e = new SocketAsyncEventArgs();
e.Completed += ReceiveCompleted; //some data receive handle
e.SetBuffer(new byte[SocketBufferSize], 0, SocketBufferSize);
if (!sock.ReceiveAsync(e))
{//IO operation finished syncronously
//handle received data
ReceiveCompleted(sock, e);
}//IO operation finished syncronously
//Add sock to internal storage
Full implementation:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Net;
using System.Net.Sockets;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace Ample
{
public class IPEndPointEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public IPEndPointEventArgs(IPEndPoint ipEndPoint)
{
IPEndPoint = ipEndPoint;
}
public IPEndPoint IPEndPoint { get; private set; }
}
public class DataReceivedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public DataReceivedEventArgs(byte[] data, IPEndPoint ipEndPoint)
{
Data = data;
IPEndPoint = ipEndPoint;
}
public byte[] Data { get; private set; }
public IPEndPoint IPEndPoint { get; private set; }
}
/// <summary>
/// TcpListner wrapper
/// Encapsulates asyncronous communications using TCP/IP.
/// </summary>
public sealed class TcpServer : IDisposable
{
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
//Construction, Destruction
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
/// <summary>
/// Creating server socket
/// </summary>
/// <param name="port">Server port number</param>
public TcpServer(int port)
{
connectedSockets = new Dictionary<IPEndPoint, Socket>();
tcpServer = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Any, port);
tcpServer.Start();
tcpServer.BeginAcceptSocket(EndAcceptSocket, tcpServer);
}
~TcpServer()
{
DisposeImpl(false);
}
public void Dispose()
{
DisposeImpl(true);
}
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
//Public Methods
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
public void SendData(byte[] data, IPEndPoint endPoint)
{
Socket sock;
lock (syncHandle)
{
if (!connectedSockets.ContainsKey(endPoint))
return;
sock = connectedSockets[endPoint];
}
sock.Send(data);
}
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
//Events
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
public event EventHandler<IPEndPointEventArgs> SocketConnected;
public event EventHandler<IPEndPointEventArgs> SocketDisconnected;
public event EventHandler<DataReceivedEventArgs> DataReceived;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
//Private Functions
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
#region Private Functions
//Обработка нового соединения
private void Connected(Socket socket)
{
var endPoint = (IPEndPoint)socket.RemoteEndPoint;
lock (connectedSocketsSyncHandle)
{
if (connectedSockets.ContainsKey(endPoint))
{
theLog.Log.DebugFormat("TcpServer.Connected: Socket already connected! Removing from local storage! EndPoint: {0}", endPoint);
connectedSockets[endPoint].Close();
}
SetDesiredKeepAlive(socket);
connectedSockets[endPoint] = socket;
}
OnSocketConnected(endPoint);
}
private static void SetDesiredKeepAlive(Socket socket)
{
socket.SetSocketOption(SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName.KeepAlive, true);
const uint time = 10000;
const uint interval = 20000;
SetKeepAlive(socket, true, time, interval);
}
static void SetKeepAlive(Socket s, bool on, uint time, uint interval)
{
/* the native structure
struct tcp_keepalive {
ULONG onoff;
ULONG keepalivetime;
ULONG keepaliveinterval;
};
*/
// marshal the equivalent of the native structure into a byte array
uint dummy = 0;
var inOptionValues = new byte[Marshal.SizeOf(dummy) * 3];
BitConverter.GetBytes((uint)(on ? 1 : 0)).CopyTo(inOptionValues, 0);
BitConverter.GetBytes((uint)time).CopyTo(inOptionValues, Marshal.SizeOf(dummy));
BitConverter.GetBytes((uint)interval).CopyTo(inOptionValues, Marshal.SizeOf(dummy) * 2);
// of course there are other ways to marshal up this byte array, this is just one way
// call WSAIoctl via IOControl
int ignore = s.IOControl(IOControlCode.KeepAliveValues, inOptionValues, null);
}
//socket disconnected handler
private void Disconnect(Socket socket)
{
var endPoint = (IPEndPoint)socket.RemoteEndPoint;
lock (connectedSocketsSyncHandle)
{
connectedSockets.Remove(endPoint);
}
socket.Close();
OnSocketDisconnected(endPoint);
}
private void ReceiveData(byte[] data, IPEndPoint endPoint)
{
OnDataReceived(data, endPoint);
}
private void EndAcceptSocket(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
{
var lister = (TcpListener)asyncResult.AsyncState;
theLog.Log.Debug("TcpServer.EndAcceptSocket");
if (disposed)
{
theLog.Log.Debug("TcpServer.EndAcceptSocket: tcp server already disposed!");
return;
}
try
{
Socket sock;
try
{
sock = lister.EndAcceptSocket(asyncResult);
theLog.Log.DebugFormat("TcpServer.EndAcceptSocket: remote end point: {0}", sock.RemoteEndPoint);
Connected(sock);
}
finally
{
//EndAcceptSocket can failes, but in any case we want to accept
new connections
lister.BeginAcceptSocket(EndAcceptSocket, lister);
}
//we can use this only from .net framework 2.0 SP1 and higher
var e = new SocketAsyncEventArgs();
e.Completed += ReceiveCompleted;
e.SetBuffer(new byte[SocketBufferSize], 0, SocketBufferSize);
BeginReceiveAsync(sock, e);
}
catch (SocketException ex)
{
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer.EndAcceptSocket: failes!", ex);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer.EndAcceptSocket: failes!", ex);
}
}
private void BeginReceiveAsync(Socket sock, SocketAsyncEventArgs e)
{
if (!sock.ReceiveAsync(e))
{//IO operation finished syncronously
//handle received data
ReceiveCompleted(sock, e);
}//IO operation finished syncronously
}
void ReceiveCompleted(object sender, SocketAsyncEventArgs e)
{
var sock = (Socket)sender;
if (!sock.Connected)
Disconnect(sock);
try
{
int size = e.BytesTransferred;
if (size == 0)
{
//this implementation based on IO Completion ports, and in this case
//receiving zero bytes mean socket disconnection
Disconnect(sock);
}
else
{
var buf = new byte[size];
Array.Copy(e.Buffer, buf, size);
ReceiveData(buf, (IPEndPoint)sock.RemoteEndPoint);
BeginReceiveAsync(sock, e);
}
}
catch (SocketException ex)
{
//We can't truly handle this excpetion here, but unhandled
//exception caused process termination.
//You can add new event to notify observer
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer: receive data error!", ex);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer: receive data error!", ex);
}
}
private void DisposeImpl(bool manualDispose)
{
if (manualDispose)
{
//We should manually close all connected sockets
Exception error = null;
try
{
if (tcpServer != null)
{
disposed = true;
tcpServer.Stop();
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer: tcpServer.Stop() failes!", ex);
error = ex;
}
try
{
foreach (var sock in connectedSockets.Values)
{
sock.Close();
}
}
catch (SocketException ex)
{
//During one socket disconnected we can faced exception
theLog.Log.Error("TcpServer: close accepted socket failes!", ex);
error = ex;
}
if ( error != null )
throw error;
}
}
private void OnSocketConnected(IPEndPoint ipEndPoint)
{
var handler = SocketConnected;
if (handler != null)
handler(this, new IPEndPointEventArgs(ipEndPoint));
}
private void OnSocketDisconnected(IPEndPoint ipEndPoint)
{
var handler = SocketDisconnected;
if (handler != null)
handler(this, new IPEndPointEventArgs(ipEndPoint));
}
private void OnDataReceived(byte[] data, IPEndPoint ipEndPoint)
{
var handler = DataReceived;
if ( handler != null )
handler(this, new DataReceivedEventArgs(data, ipEndPoint));
}
#endregion Private Functions
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
//Private Fields
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
#region Private Fields
private const int SocketBufferSize = 1024;
private readonly TcpListener tcpServer;
private bool disposed;
private readonly Dictionary<IPEndPoint, Socket> connectedSockets;
private readonly object connectedSocketsSyncHandle = new object();
#endregion Private Fields
}
}

It is surprisingly simple to make a multi-threaded server. Check out this example.
class Server
{
private Socket socket;
private List<Socket> connections;
private volatile Boolean endAccept;
// glossing over some code.
/// <summary></summary>
public void Accept()
{
EventHandler<SocketAsyncEventArgs> completed = null;
SocketAsyncEventArgs args = null;
completed = new EventHandler<SocketAsyncEventArgs>((s, e) =>
{
if (e.SocketError != SocketError.Success)
{
// handle
}
else
{
connections.Add(e.AcceptSocket);
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(AcceptNewClient, e.AcceptSocket);
}
e.AcceptSocket = null;
if (endAccept)
{
args.Dispose();
}
else if (!socket.AcceptAsync(args))
{
completed(socket, args);
}
});
args = new SocketAsyncEventArgs();
args.Completed += completed;
if (!socket.AcceptAsync(args))
{
completed(socket, args);
}
}
public void AcceptNewClient(Object state)
{
var socket = (Socket)state;
// proccess
}
}

A bit of advise from the guy who deals mainly with mobile networking: do your homework with regular networking connection, preferably on the localhost. This will save you a lot of time during testing and will keep you sane until you figure out the approach that works for you best.
As for some particular implementation, I always go with synchronized sockets (you will need to configure timeouts to not to get stuck if something will go wrong) and everything runs in separate threads that are synchronized with the help of events. It's much simplier than you think. Here's some useful links to get you started:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3e8s7xdd.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228969.aspx

I'm writing the same application right now and I use solution like this:
http://clutch-inc.com/blog/?p=4
It's been tested right now and works perfectly. It is important to make this service only for receiving and storing messages (somewhere) without other work. I'm using NServiceBus for saving messages. Other service takes messages from queue and do the rest.

Well, the C# syntax is not fresh in my mind now but I don't think it is to much different from the Posix standard.
What you can may do is when you create your listen socket you can stipulate a value for the backlog (maximum number of simultaneous connections for that server) and create a thread pull with the same size. Thread pools are easier to use than traditional ones. The TCP you queue for you all the connections above the backlog parameter.

How to fix "a connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time ..." error?

I'm making a game in C# and I want to display the progress (movements and so on) of opponent. So I send events in game via TCP protocol to opponent.
I've already tried my application on localhost and it works but when I try to use my external address in order to communicate over the internet I get the error below in class TcpInformer.Connect():
a connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a
period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond (my external IP address):(port)
I thought the problem was that I was behind NAT. But I've already set up portforwarding for port 49731 on IP 10.0.0.1 and nothing changed.
My second guess was Windows firewall but even when I stopped the firewall my app didn't start working.
My code for connecting of the two PCs is:
TcpInformer peer;
TcpHost server;
public void PrepareConnection() // for server (host)
{
playerType = PlayerType.One;
server = new TcpHost(form, this);
server.Start("10.0.0.1", 49731);
}
public void PrepareConnection2() // for client
{
playerType = PlayerType.Two;
peer = new TcpInformer(form, this);
peer.Connect("MY EXTERNAL IP", 49731);
}
// classes TcpHost and TcpInformer
public interface ITcpCommunication
{
#region Operations (3) 
void ReadData();
void SendData(byte[] message);
void SendData(byte[] message, int size);
#endregion Operations 
}
public class TcpInformer : ITcpCommunication
{
#region Fields (9) 
private NetworkStream con_ns;
private TcpClient con_server;
private bool connected;
private Fmain form;
private SecondPlayer player;
private int port;
private string server;
private string stringData;
#endregion Fields 
#region Delegates and Events (1)
// Events (1) 
public event SimulationEventHandler ReadEvent;
#endregion Delegates and Events 
#region Constructors (1) 
public TcpInformer(Fmain form, SecondPlayer player)
{
this.form = form;
connected = false;
this.player = player;
}
#endregion Constructors 
#region Methods (6) 
// Public Methods (5) 
///
///
///
/// e.g., server = "127.0.0.1"
/// e.g., port = 9050
public void Connect(string server, int port)
{
this.port = port;
this.server = server;
connected = true;
try
{
con_server = new TcpClient(this.server, this.port);
}
catch (SocketException ex)
{
connected = false;
MessageBox.Show("Unable to connect to server" + ex.Message);
return;
}
con_ns = con_server.GetStream();
}
public void Disconnect()
{
form.Debug("Disconnecting from server...", "Player2Net");
con_ns.Close();
con_server.Close();
}
public void ReadData()
{
if (con_ns != null)
{
if (con_ns.DataAvailable)
{
byte[] data = new byte[1200];
int received = con_ns.Read(data, 0, data.Length);
player.ProcessReceivedData(data, received);
}
}
else
{
form.Debug("Warning: con_ns is not inicialized.","player2");
}
}
public void SendData(byte[] message)
{
con_ns.Write(message, 0, message.Length);
con_ns.Flush();
}
public void SendData(byte[] message, int size)
{
if (con_ns != null)
{
con_ns.Write(message, 0, size);
}
}
// Private Methods (1) 
private void Debug(string message)
{
form.Debug("Connected to: " + server + "port: " + port.ToString() + ": " + message, "Player2Net");
}
#endregion Methods 
}
public class TcpHost : ITcpCommunication
{
#region Fields (9) 
private ASCIIEncoding enc;
private Fmain form;
private TcpListener listener;
private SecondPlayer player;
private int port;
private Socket s;
private string server;
private bool state;
#endregion Fields 
#region Delegates and Events (1)
// Events (1) 
public event SimulationEventHandler ReadEvent;
#endregion Delegates and Events 
#region Constructors (1) 
public TcpHost(Fmain form, SecondPlayer player)
{
this.player = player;
this.form = form;
state = false;
enc = new ASCIIEncoding();
}
#endregion Constructors 
#region Methods (5) 
// Public Methods (5) 
public void Close()
{
state = false;
s.Close();
listener.Stop();
}
public void ReadData()
{
if (state == true)
{
if (s.Available > 0) // if there's any data
{
byte[] data = new byte[1200];
int received = s.Receive(data);
player.ProcessReceivedData(data, received);
}
}
}
public void SendData(byte[] message)
{
if (state == true)
{
s.Send(message);
}
}
public void SendData(byte[] message, int size)
{
if (state == true)
{
s.Send(message, size, SocketFlags.None);
}
}
public void Start(string p_ipAddress, int listenPort)
{
//IPAddress ipAddress = IPAddress.Loopback
IPAddress ipAddress = IPAddress.Parse(p_ipAddress);
IPEndPoint ipLocalEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(ipAddress, listenPort);
//listener = new TcpListener(ipAddress, listenPort);
listener = new TcpListener(ipLocalEndPoint);
server = "[provider]";
port = listenPort;
listener.Start();
form.Debug("Server is running", "Player1Net");
form.Debug("Listening on port " + listenPort, "Player1Net");
form.Debug("Waiting for connections...", "Player1Net");
s = listener.AcceptSocket();
form.Debug("Connection accepted from " + s.RemoteEndPoint, "Player1Net");
state = true;
}
#endregion Methods 
}
Is there a way how to check what is wrong?
Help is much appreciated!

I found out what was the problem. I was listening on 10.0.0.1 and trying to reach my external IP (second instance of my program) which is impossible on a computer with one connection to the internet.

I also faced the same problem in AWS VPN.
I changed the proxy.company.com (external ip) to 10.0.0.5.
And it works now.