We Keep Coding

Caliburn.Micro: Grid not getting binded/linked to x:Name

So I'm developing a Windows Phone 8 app with the Caliburn.Micro framework. I'm trying to create a grid where I, at runtime add/remove elements such as TextBlock's at runtime. I've tried a few things to bind my code to the x:Name but nothing has worked so far.
So one of the things i tried was having a placeholder grid in my xaml aka View:
<Grid x:Name="ContentPanel" Margin="0,97,0,0" Grid.RowSpan="2">
</Grid>
And then i my ViewModel i use the following to bind my ContentPanel Grid:
private Grid contentPanel;
public Grid ContentPanel
{
get
{
return contentPanel;
}
set
{
contentPanel = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => ContentPanel);
}
}
I then created a TextBlock to add to the grid:
TextBlock txt1 = new TextBlock();
txt1.Text = "2005 Products Shipped";
txt1.FontSize = 20;
txt1.FontWeight = FontWeights.Bold;
Grid.SetRow(txt1, 1);
And finally i added the TextBlock to my Grid:
ContentPanel.Children.Add(txt1);
When i run this code ContentPanel turn out to be equals null, why is that? Shouldn't Caliburn auto bind ContentPanel x:Name="ContentPanel" with the property ContentPanel?
I would appreciate your help in this matter.
My core problem, that i need solved is this:
I got a login page in my app where i show some pictures and text loaded from a server. As you can see below this is done with Image and a TextBlock When that server is offline or the wi-fi simply aren't enabled i want to replace this picture+text with a static image. Aka i want to remove the TextBlock from the StackPanel.
The part where i load and show the stuff form my server works great and looks like this in my xaml:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
So when the server is offline/wifi disabled i want to replace that with. so that the TextBlock is no longer there:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
Is this even possible? If not what would the best semi-solution be?
EDIT 1: I've managed to setup the flow following the instructions from the accepted answer. But my BooleanToVisibilityConverter is not called, though my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); is getting called.
My Property:
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
How i change the bool: This code is called in my constructor for my ViewModel(just as a test to see if it was working):
IsConnectionAvailable = false;
TextBlock (without trigger code cause its the same as previous):
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BoolToVisibility}}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
It's like the Binding IsConnectionAvailable isn't working because i can change the name IsConnectionAvailable in my Xaml to anything and my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); will still be called.
Any ideas?
I can't even do a normal bind Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay} to a public Visibility IsVisibil property. I've done this in other classes, but even this won't work??
EDIT 2: The problem that course the binding not to work, seems to lie somewhere in this code:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</StackPanel>
Solution to EDIT 1 and 2: I created an x:Name"Root" at the top of my xaml structure. Then changed the binding to:
ElementName=Root, Path=DataContext.IsVisibil
This is needed because the binding to visibility that I'm trying to set is inside another DataContxt.

This isn't the correct way to use CM, there are a number of areas where you are confusing the model and viewmodel and the binding functionality in CM.
What you are doing currently
You are attempting to have the CM framework look for a property called ContentPanel on your ViewModel and automatically figure out what properties on Grid to bind it to...
This won't work because of a few reasons:
I don't think there is a convention for Grid in CM - it's not really bindable in an obvious way (it's a layout container)
Grid is not a data enabled control - it doesn't know how to consume a collection and display dynamic rows out the box (it's a layout container)
What you are doing doesn't really make any sense (you have an instance of a grid in your UserControl and you have also instantiated a grid in your ViewModel - these are two separate instances of a control - you can't 'bind' them together - that's not how it all works)
CM and Bindings
When you using element name bindings e.g. x:Name with CM, it attempts to find a property on the ViewModel which matches the element name. At this point, depending on the conventions setup for the source control in question, CM will attempt to automagically wire up all the bits and pieces.
There are default conventions contained in ConventionManager which determine which properties to bind when you use element name bindings - e.g. for TextBlock, the Text property on the TextBlock is bound to the target property on the ViewModel.
http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#src/Caliburn.Micro.Platform/ConventionManager.cs - look at the class constructor on ConventionManager to see the out of the box conventions - there isn't one for Grid
Once a target property is found, CM will bind it up.
(As an aside: it's worth noting that if the control type is a ContentControl CM will do some composition magic so you can have viewmodels that contain other viewmodels and have a composition all bound up at runtime - great for screens which have multiple sub-windows etc)
The problem you have is that there is no convention setup for Grid out of the box - this is most likely because a Grid in SL/WPF is primarily used for layout, and is not really a 'data container' or data aware in any way (apart from the few dependency properties you can bind to) - i.e. I don't think it's possible to bind to a grid and get a dynamic number of columns/rows without some customisation to the control, hence the omission of any conventions
(think about it - if you are binding a grid to a collection, what should the grid do... add rows or columns? It can't really be supported in a sensible way)
Now bringing it back to SL/WPF for a sec:
Usually if you want a variable list of items you will need to bind to the ItemsSource property of a control which inherits from ItemsControl (or ItemsControl itself).
Many controls do this: if they need to display a dynamic number of items they will usually inherit from ItemsControl.
How does this tie in with CM?
Caliburn Micro knows how to bind up ItemsControl out of the box. This means you can have a property on your ViewModel containing a collection of items and after binding you get a dynamic view of these at runtime
For example - a CM bound ItemsControl might look like this:
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding SomeTextualProperty}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Now you just need a collection of objects to bind this to - each item in the collection becomes a new item in the control with its DataContext pointing to the bound item. I've made the assumption that you would want each item to be a ViewModel which contained the property SomeTextualProperty - I've defined that here...
// Provides a viewmodel for a textual item
public class TextItemViewModel
{
public string SomeTextualProperty { get; set;}
}
The VM that should contain the list of items would need to have a collection to bind against.
(Note: Since you are adding items to it at runtime you need to tell the UI when the collection changes - ObservableCollection gives you this for free as it implements collection changed notification events)
// This is the viewmodel that contains the list of text items
public class ScreenViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<TextItemViewModel> TextItems { get; set; }
}
What else I would consider the incorrect approach
Your ViewModels shouldn't know about your View implementation i.e. they shouldn't reference any type of controls unless absolutely necessary (I can't think of a time when I had to put a control in a VM). ViewModels should model the view - but they shouldn't really need to know any specifics about what that view contains - this way they are more easily testable and they are easily reused
If you follow the above approach, you can get away with providing an application which re-uses the set of viewmodels, but provides different views for each. You can try this by replacing ItemsControl with another type of control in the view (as long as it's data aware such as a datagrid) and the VM will still work - the VM is view agnostic.
Your use of Grid in your VM is not ideal because Grid is a visual control, it is not data. Remember that the visuals are your View and the ViewModel should just contain data and events which notify the view of things happening
If I was doing this - the code would look more like the code I posted above.
To sum up
Model the information you wanted to show in a ViewModel (TextItemViewModel)
Add a collection of these objects to the main ViewModel (ScreenViewModel) using a change aware collection such as ObservableCollection
Add/remove items from the collection using the standard add/remove
Bind the ItemsControl in the view using x:Name bindings to the collection on your ScreenViewModel
Adding/removing items in the VM will fire property changed notifications. ItemsControl will watch for these events and update itself accordingly
Addendum
You could get away with just using an ObservableCollection<string> instead of a TextBlockViewModel but it's not clear if you want to add more properties to the items you are binding to the grid (such as IsHeading property for headings which you could then make bold/italic in the view)
If you want to just use strings just modify the DataTemplate to bind directly to the DataContext rather than a property on the DataContext
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
**<TextBlock Text="{Binding}"/> <!-- Bind direct -->**
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Edit:
Ok in your case it's quite simple - your ViewModel should simply model the state of the server:
public class LoginPageViewModel
{
public bool IsConnectionAvailable { get; set; } // or whatever your variable should be called
}
Then bind the visibility of the textblock to this using a converter:
<TextBlock Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BooleanToVisibilityConverter}}">
You will need to declare the static resource for the converter somewhere (in the control itself or your main resources dictionary for example)
It looks like there is a converter already defined in System.Windows.Controls somewhere, but in case you can't find it the implementation is pretty simple (you could probably do this a bit better to guard against invalid input but for brevity I've kept it tiny):
public class BooleanToVisibilityConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (bool) value ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
You may also want to change the state from available/unavailable during the views lifecycle, so in that case you probably want to use the property changed events built in to PropertyChangedBase (which Screen also inherits) to let the view know when the property changes
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
Addendum 2
I prefer the terse CM syntax instead of being explicit when binding action messages - so your XAML would change from:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
To
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128" cal:Message.Attach="[Tap] = [LoadAdvertisement($dataContext.Link)]"></Image>
(actually that might not be right with the $dataContext.Link part ... but then again it might be... see here: http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=All%20About%20Actions&referringTitle=Documentation)

WPF Binding to parent DataContext

We have a WPF application with a standard MVVM pattern, leveraging Cinch (and therefore MefedMVVM) for View -> ViewModel resolution. This works well, and I can bind the relevant controls to properties on the ViewModel.
Within a particular View, we have an Infragistics XamGrid. This grid is bound to an ObservableCollection on the ViewModel, and displays the appropriate rows. However, I then have a specific column on this grid which I am trying to bind a TextBox text value to a property on the parent DataContext, rather than the ObservableCollection. This binding is failing.
We've gone through several options here including:
Using AncestorType to track up the tree and bind to the DataContext of the parent UserControl like so (from the great answer to this question, as well as this one)...
{Binding Path=PathToProperty, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type typeOfAncestor}}}
Specifying the ElementName and trying to target the top level control directly. Have a look here if you'd like to read about using ElementName.
Using a 'proxy' FrameorkElement defined in the resources for the UserControl to try and 'pass in' the context as required. We define the element as below, then reference as a static resource...
<FrameworkElement x:Key="ProxyContext" DataContext="{Binding Path=DataContext, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"></FrameworkElement>
In this case the binding finds the FrameworkElement, but can not access anything beyond that (when specifying a Path).
Having read around, it looks quite likely that this is caused by the Infragistics XamGrid building columns outside of the tree. However, even if this is the case, at least options 2 or 3 should work.
Our last thoughts are that it is related to the V - VM binding, but even using Snoop we've yet to find what the exact issue is. I'm by no means an expert with WPF binding so any pointers would be appreciated.
EDIT: I have found some templating examples from Infragistics here that I will try.
EDIT 2: As pointed out by #Dtex, templates are the way to go. Here is the relevant snippet for use with a XamGrid:
<ig:GroupColumn Key="CurrentDate">
<ig:GroupColumn.HeaderTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=DataContext.CurrentDateTest, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ig:GroupColumn.HeaderTemplate>
<ig:GroupColumn.Columns>
I've left the XML open... you'd simply add the columns you wanted, then close off the relevant tags.

I dont know about XamGrid but that's what i'll do with a standard wpf DataGrid:
<DataGrid>
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTemplateColumn>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding DataContext.MyProperty, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=MyUserControl}}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBox Text="{Binding DataContext.MyProperty, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=MyUserControl}}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
</DataGrid.Columns>
</DataGrid>
Since the TextBlock and the TextBox specified in the cell templates will be part of the visual tree, you can walk up and find whatever control you need.

Because of things like this, as a general rule of thumb, I try to avoid as much XAML "trickery" as possible and keep the XAML as dumb and simple as possible and do the rest in the ViewModel (or attached properties or IValueConverters etc. if really necessary).
If possible I would give the ViewModel of the current DataContext a reference (i.e. property) to the relevant parent ViewModel
public class ThisViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
TypeOfAncestorViewModel Parent { get; set; }
}
and bind against that directly instead.
<TextBox Text="{Binding Parent}" />

Bind button in DataTemplate to command in the form's ViewModel

My problem is similar to the one described in this question:
WPF MVVM Button Control Binding in DataTemplate
Here is my XAML:
<Window x:Class="MissileSharp.Launcher.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MissileSharp Launcher" Height="350" Width="525">
<Grid>
<!-- when I put the button here (outside the list), the binding works -->
<!--<Button Content="test" Command="{Binding Path=FireCommand}" />-->
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding CommandSets}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<!-- I need the button here (inside the list), and here the binding does NOT work -->
<Button Content="{Binding}" Command="{Binding Path=FireCommand}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
</Window>
It's just a ListBox, bound to an ObservableCollection<string> named CommandSets (which is in the ViewModel).
This binding works (it displays a button for each item in the collection).
Now I want to bind the button to a command (FireCommand), which is also in the ViewModel.
Here's the relevant part of the ViewModel:
public class MainWindowViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ICommand FireCommand { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<string> CommandSets { get; set; }
public MainWindowViewModel()
{
this.FireCommand = new RelayCommand(new Action<object>(this.FireMissile));
}
private void FireMissile(Object obj)
{
System.Windows.MessageBox.Show("fire");
}
}
The binding of this button does NOT work.
From what I've understood from the question I linked above, the binding doesn't work because:
(correct me if I'm wrong)
The button is inside the ListBox, so it only "knows" the binding of the ListBox (the ObservableCollection, in this case), but not the binding of the main window
I'm trying to bind to a command in the main ViewModel of the main window (which the button doesn't "know")
The command itself is definitely correct, because when I put the button outside the ListBox (see the XAML above for an example), the binding works and the command is executed.
Apparently, I "just" need to tell the button to bind to the main ViewModel of the form.
But I'm not able to figure out the right XAML syntax.
I tried several approaches that I found after some googling, but none of them worked for me:
<Button Content="{Binding}" Command="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Window}, Path=DataContext.FireCommand}" />
<Button Content="{Binding}" Command="{Binding Path=FireCommand, Source={StaticResource MainWindow}}" />
<Button Content="{Binding}" Command="{Binding Path=FireCommand, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type Window}}}" />
Could someone please:
give me the proper XAML to bind the button inside the ListBox to a command in the form's MainViewModel?
point me to a link where this advanced binding stuff is explained in a way that a WPF/MVVM beginner can understand?
I'm feeling like I'm just copying and pasting arcane XAML incantations, and so far I don't have any clue (and can't find any good documentation) how I would figure out by myself in which cases I'd need RelativeSource or StaticResource or whatever instead of a "normal" binding.

It's:
{Binding DataContext.FireCommand,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}
No need to walk up to the root unless you actually change the DataContext along the way, but as the ListBox seems to bind to a property on the main VM this should be enough.
The only thing i recommend reading is the Data Binding Overview, and the Binding class documentation (including its properties).
Also here is a short explanation on how bindings are constructed: A binding consists of a source and a Path relative to that source, by default the source is the current DataContext. Sources that can be set explicitly are: Source, ElementName & RelativeSource. Setting any of those will override the DataContext as source.
So if you use a source like RelativeSource and want to access something in the DataContext on that level the DataContext needs to appear in the Path.

This may be considered unrelated by most, but this search is only 1 of 3 results that you'll find searching for data binding commands to controls inside a data template--as it relates to Xamarin Forms. So, maybe it'll help someone now-a-days.
Like me you may wonder how to bind commands inside a BindableLayout. Credit jesulink2514 for answering this at Xamarin Forums, where it's probably overlooked by many because of all the comments. Here's his solution, but I'm including the link below:
<ContenPage x:Name="MainPage">
<ListView Grid.Row="1"
ItemsSource="{Binding Customers}"
VerticalOptions="Fill"
x:Name="ListviewCustomer">
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Label Text="{Binding Property}"/>
<Button Command="{Binding BindingContext.ItemCommand, Source={x:Reference MainPage}}"
CommandParameter="{Binding .}">Click me</Button>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
</ContentPage>
https://forums.xamarin.com/discussion/comment/217355/#Comment_217355

WPF implicit datatemplate with observablecollection

I'm new to WPF and using MVVM. I have a view in which I want to display different content according to what a user selects on a menu. One of those things is another user control Temp which has a view model (TempVM) so I am doing this:
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Path=TempVM}"/>
and TempVM (of type TempViewModel)is null until the user clicks a button. Its data template is this
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:TempViewModel}">
<view:Temp />
</DataTemplate>
That's fine, but the other thing I want to do is show a listbox when a user clicks a different menu item. So I am trying to do
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Path=Missions}"/>
(Missions is an observable collection of MissionData) and trying to template it like this:
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type ObservableCollection(MissionData)}">
<StackPanel>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=MissionData, Mode=TwoWay}" DisplayMemberPath="MissionName" SelectedValuePath="MissionId" />
<Button Content="Go"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
But the compiler doesn't like the type reference. If I try doing it by giving the template a key and specifying that key in the ContentControl it works but obviously I see the ListBox and button when there's no Missions. Obviously I could make a user control and viewmodel and follow the same pattern as I did for the TempVM but it seems over the top. Am I going the right way about this and what do I need to do?

From what i see is that you try to use a Collection as a dataobject which is in my opinion bad practice. Having a DataTemplate for a collection is also problematic, like you already have witnessed. I would advice you to use a ViewModel for your missions collection.
class MissionsSelectionViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Mission> Misssions;
public MissionData SelectedMission;
public ICommand MissionSelected;
}
and modify your datatemplate to
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type MissionsSelectionViewModel}">
<StackPanel>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Missions}" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=MissionData, Mode=TwoWay}" DisplayMemberPath="MissionName" SelectedValuePath="MissionId" />
<Button Content="Go" Command="{Binding MissionSelected}/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>

If I were to follow your pattern of implicit templates, I would derive a custom non-generic collection MissionDataCollection from ObservableCollection<MissionData> and use it to keep MissionData items. Then I would simply reference that collection in DataType. This solution gives other advantages like events aggregation over the collection that are useful.
However, it seems to me that the best solution is the following.
Add a IsMissionsListVisible property to your VM.
Bind the Visibility property of the ContentControl showing the list to the IsMissionsListVisible property.
Use a keyed DataTemplate resource.
Implement the logic that determines if IsMissionsListVisible. Supposedly it should be true when there is at least one mission in the selected item. But the logic may be more complex.
I would do it this way. In fact, I do it this way usually, and it gives several benefits. The most important is that I can explicitly control the logic of content visibility in various situations (e.g. async content refresh).

problem with wpf command not executing when button clicked

I have the following XAML in a WPF application. I would like to bind the button to an ICommand in a view model. For some reason, I am not able to see the command from my view.
this is in a user control.
<Grid>
<Grid.DataContext>
<Binding
x:Name="SettingsData"
Path="Data" />
</Grid.DataContext>
.
.
.
<DockPanel Grid.Column="1">
<Button x:Name="SaveButton"
DockPanel.Dock="Top"
Height="25"
HorizontalAlignment="Left"
Margin="70 0 0 0"
Command="{Binding Path=SaveData}"
>Save Changes</Button>
</DockPanel>
</Grid>
Here is my ICommand object -
public ICommand SaveData
{
get
{
if (_saveData == null)
{
_saveData = new RelayCommand(
param => this.saveData(),
param => true
);
}
return _saveData ;
}
}
Does anyone have any idea why I cannot bind to this command?
Thanks for any thoughts....

Looks like you are setting the DataContext of the Grid to the Data property of your ViewModel (or object). If the object that the Data property exposes doesn't provide the SaveData command, you'll have the problem you're describing. Remember the DataContext is inherited from the parent.
If you require that the DataContext is set in that manner, and still require the button to reference the parent DataContext, one option would be to use a RelativeSource to point to an element that has the ViewModel as the DataContext.
In WPF you also have the option of making those commands static and using the {x:Static} markup extension to reach it.
Hope that helps.
EDIT: Here's an example if your <Grid> is contained in a <UserControl>.
<Button Command="{Binding Path=DataContext.SaveData,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor,
AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}}" ... />
Also, I don't know what your full XAML looks like, but I suspect that this can be simplified greatly by removing the DataContext on the Grid and Binding Data on the ItemsControl (or whatever you're using to show the list of objects).

Looking at below error, looks like your DataContext on DockPanel is bound to some sort of List:
I see this in the output window - BindingExpression path error:
'SaveData' property not found on 'object' ''List`1'
Please override Source attribute in Binding if the DataContext is not at the top level