We Keep Coding

Why the Process Exited event raise automatic all the time?

In the top of Form1 i did:
private Process zipFileDirectoryProcess;
In the constructor i did:
zipFileDirectoryProcess = new Process();
zipFileDirectoryProcess.StartInfo.FileName = "explorer.exe";
zipFileDirectoryProcess.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true;
zipFileDirectoryProcess.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
zipFileDirectoryProcess.Exited += new EventHandler(zipFileDirectoryProcess_Exited);
Then i have a method i call it from a button click event:
private void Compress()
{
zipFileDirectoryProcess.StartInfo.Arguments = zipFileDirectoryProcess.StartInfo.Arguments = "/select," + Path.GetFullPath(t);
zipFileDirectoryProcess.Start();
zipFileDirectoryProcess.WaitForExit();
this.TopMost = true;
}
And then in the bottom the Exited event:
private void zipFileDirectoryProcess_Exited(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.BeginInvoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate()
{
this.TopMost = false;
}));
}
What i wanted to do is only when i close the process window after started it in the method only if closed the window/process then do the Exited event.
The problem is that once the process started after 2-3 seconds its jumping automatic to the Exited event.
How can i fix it ? Tried examples cant figure out.
Tried to add this line:
zipFileDirectoryProcess.WaitForExit();
But no effect.

zipFileDirectoryProcess.StartInfo.FileName = "explorer.exe";
Trying to start Windows Explorer again when it is already running, and it is always running, will have a disappointing outcome. It is a "heavy" process and it intentionally tries the minimize the number of running copies. Otherwise known as a "single-instance app". There are lots like that, the Microsoft Office programs are single instance apps for example.
So what really happens is that explorer.exe actually starts up, but sees that another instance is already running. And uses process interop to ask that first instance to do the job that you asked it to do. Since you didn't ask it to do anything, you just get another window, displayed by the first instance. The one that you started immediately quits, it doesn't have anything else to do.
So, yes, you'll see that the Exited event fires without you doing anything. Accurately telling you that the explorer.exe process you started did in fact quit. Easy to see in the Taskmgr.exe Processes tab btw. Waiting for that window to be closed is never going to work, it is displayed by the original instance of explorer.exe.
This will just not work the way you hope it will work. What you are actually trying to do is not quite obvious but can be guessed at. Creating a ZIP archive is not difficult, there are excellent libraries available for C# to get the job done, no point in asking another program to do it for you. DotNetZip and SharpZipLib are very popular. It got finally added to .NET as well in version 4.5, Microsoft finally getting over the lost Stacker lawsuit, about time. If you really, really want another program to do it for you then use a console mode zipper like 7-zip.

To show output folder in windows explorer to the user, it's simply enough to do this:
Process.Start("explorer.exe", OutputDir);

FormClosing shutdown event doesn't write to file

I have a backup power supply for my computer which is attached inline with it and the wall. When I pull the power cord from the wall, I have 2-5 minutes before the backup supply shuts down the computer. It is during this time that I want to write data to a file with the code below:
private void Form1_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
if (e.CloseReason.Equals(CloseReason.WindowsShutDown))
{
writeContents("Interrupted");
sendMessage("PWR - The Spring Test Machine has stopped");
return;
}
if (e.CloseReason.Equals(CloseReason.UserClosing))
{
if (MessageBox.Show("You are closing this application.\n\nAre you sure you wish to exit ?", "Warning: Not Submitted", MessageBoxButtons.YesNoCancel, MessageBoxIcon.Stop) == DialogResult.Yes)
{
writeContents("Interrupted");
return;
}
else
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
The problem is that it didn't work. I don't think the the closing event ever got called. Any ideas would greatly be appreciated. Thank you.

From here http://www.daniweb.com/software-development/csharp/threads/253249/application-exit-does-not-trigger-the-formclosing
when you use taskmanager to "kill" the appliction, it doesn't fire any
events, It simply stops the execution, This is how you close an
application that has frozen. if you waited for it to handle any
events, then it would still be frozen.
as for when you restart the computer or shutdown, the event will be
called only if there is enough time, they system tells all
applications it is shutting down and only gives them a short amount of
time to handle business before it kills them. Windows 7 will show a
dialog telling you which applications are still busy and ask you if
you want to kill them and shutdown, or cancel. But as for XP, it just
kills them after X amount of seconds.
That's pretty much how I would have imagined the behavior of FormClosing... Would Application.ApplicationExit Event be a better event to listen for?

Here is some usful info about Properties of FormClosing event:
Bug in FormClosingEventArgs.CloseReason?
And you can try using switch statement, like here:
Detect reason for form closing

Not sure if it works cuase i need to check it first and im not infront of my machine now .. but have you also tried the other elements of the CloseReason enum ?
try TaskManagerClosing .
In any case try first to throw a message( messagebox ) to see if you actually have the correct CloseReason you want and also don't forget to use the e.Cancel = true if you dont want the pc to close everytime you check it .
After that check if the method you have for writting to the file is ok .
maybe this will help also
Prompt user to save when closing app

Using LocalMessageSender synchronously

We have an application that has a primary window, it can launch multiple other windows, in new browsers. We are using a silverlight application as a coordinating server in the primary window to close all windows that are part of the app, regardless of the way they are opened (we can't guarantee it was via window.open so don't always have a handle to the window in javascript).
On log out, we want to signal all the other windows to perform an auto-save, if necessary, then close down.
So all windows have a silverlight app, they coordinate using localmessagesenders. However, these are asynchronous:
private void ProcessAutosave()
{
foreach (string s in _windows)
{
SendMessage(s, "notify-logout");
}
// code here quoted later...
}
// sendasynch doesn't send until the method terminates, so have to do it in it's own function.
private void SendMessage(string to, string message)
{
var lms = new LocalMessageSender(to);
lms.SendCompleted += new EventHandler<SendCompletedEventArgs>(SenderSendCompleted);
lms.SendAsync(message);
}
Since the ProcessAutosave is called from a javascript onunload event which can't be cancelled, we need this to be synchronous and not complete before we have a response processed from each sub-window so the session state will still be valid etc.
In the SenderSendCompleted we remove items from _windows when they have said they're done.
So I added a loop on the end:
while(_windows.Count > 0) {
Thread.Sleep(1)
}
However, that never terminates, unless I put an iteration counter on it.
Am I the victim of a compiler optimisation meaning the changes in SenderSendCompleted do not affect that while loop, or, have I fundamentally misunderstood something? Or missed something obvious that's staring me in the face?

It sounds like a subtle verson of a race situation due to going sync/async. Couldn't the process in queston also receive notifications from the windows that they have received the message and are shutting down? Once all of the counter messages have been received, then the main app could shut down without the busy wait at the end(?).

I have found a way to work round. However, this does not really "solve" the problem generally, just in my case, which is also only supporting internet explorer.
function WindowCloseEventHandler()
{
var app = // get silverlight app handle...
app.doAutoSave();
var params = 'whatever you need';
var args = new Object();
args.hwnd = window;
window.showModalDialog('blocker.aspx',args,params);
}
function checkAutoSave()
{
var app = // get silverlight app handle...
return app.autosavecomplete();
}
Then in blocker.aspx we display a static "performing logout handlers" type message and do:
function timerTick()
{
if(window.dialogArguments.hwnd.checkAutoSave()) {
window.close();
} else {
setTimeout(timerTick, 500);
}
}
And start the timer on window load.
The child window's silverlight apps are notified to start an autosave, then they notify the parent when they are done. We then poll the parent's status from a modal dialog, which blocks the termination of the WindowCloseEventHandler() which we have wired up to the onclose event of the body.
It's hacky and horrible, but it means silverlight stays asynchronous and we're using a javascript timer so the javascript isn't loading the system.
Of course if the user closes the modal dialogue, there is a potential for issue.

Process.CloseMainWindow() not working

I start the Windows On-Screen-Keyboard like that:
s_onScreenKeyboard = new Process();
s_onScreenKeyboard.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo("osk.exe");
s_onScreenKeyboard.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
s_onScreenKeyboard.Exited += new EventHandler(s_onScreenKeyboard_Exited);
s_onScreenKeyboard.Start();
This works fine, but when I try to stop it using the following code, it does not work, i.e. the OSK keeps running and the method returns false:
s_onScreenKeyboard.CloseMainWindow();
if (!s_onScreenKeyboard.HasExited)
{
if (!s_onScreenKeyboard.WaitForExit(1000))
{
s_onScreenKeyboard.Close();
//s_onScreenKeyboard.Kill();
}
}
When uncommenting s_onScreenKeyboard.Kill(); it is closed, but the problem is that osk.exe obviously uses another process called "msswchx.exe" which is not closed if I simply kill the OSK process. This way, I would end up with hundreds of these processes which is not what I want.
Another strange thing is that the CloseMainWindow() call worked at some time, but then it suddenly did not work anymore, and I do not remember what has changed.
Any ideas?
EDIT: I have found a solution myself. Please see my answer for details.
Background:
I am implementing an On-Screen-Keyboard for my application because it should work with a touchscreen. It is important that the keyboard layout matches the layout which is configured in Windows since the application will be shipped to many different countries. Therefore, instead of implementing a custom keyboard control with approx. 537 keyboard layouts (exaggerating a little here...), I wanted to utilize the Windows built-in On-Screen-Keyboard which adapts to the selected keyboard layout automatically, saving a lot of work for me.

I have found the/a solution myself:
When I successfully retrieve the MainWindowHandle after the process has been started, the call to CloseMainWindow() is also successful later on. I do not understand the reason for this, but the important thing is: it works!
BTW, for others having the same problem: The MainWindowHandle is not available immediately after starting the process. Obviously, it takes some milliseconds until the MainWindow is started which is why I use the following code to retrieve the handle:
DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
IntPtr handle = IntPtr.Zero;
while (handle == IntPtr.Zero && DateTime.Now - start <= TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2))
{
try
{
// sleep a while to allow the MainWindow to open...
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(50);
handle = s_onScreenKeyboard.MainWindowHandle;
}
catch (Exception) { }
}
In this code I continuously get the MainWindowHandle every ~50ms as long as it is still equal to IntPtr.Zero. If the handle could not be retrieved after 2 seconds, I quit the loop to avoid an endless loop in case of error.

You need to wait untill the process finishes initialization, run
Process.WaitForInputIdle Method in order to do that.

Process.HasExited returns true even though process is running?

I have been observing that Process.HasExited sometimes returns true even though the process is still running.
My code below starts a process with name "testprogram.exe" and then waits for it to exit. The problem is that sometimes I get thrown the exception; it seems that even though HasExited returns true the process itself is still alive in the system - how can this be??
My program writes to a log file just before it terminates and thus I need to be absolutely sure that this log file exists (aka the process has terminated/finished) before reading it. Continuously checking for it's existence is not an option.
// Create new process object
process = new Process();
// Setup event handlers
process.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
process.OutputDataReceived += OutputDataReceivedEvent;
process.ErrorDataReceived += ErrorDataReceivedEvent;
process.Exited += ProgramExitedEvent;
// Setup start info
ProcessStartInfo psi = new ProcessStartInfo
{
FileName = ExePath,
// Must be false to redirect IO
UseShellExecute = false,
RedirectStandardOutput = true,
RedirectStandardError = true,
Arguments = arguments
};
process.StartInfo = psi;
// Start the program
process.Start();
while (!process.HasExited)
Thread.Sleep( 500 );
Process[] p = Process.GetProcessesByName( "testprogram" );
if ( p.Length != 0 )
throw new Exception("Oh oh");
UPDATE: I just tried waiting with process.WaitForExit() instead of the polling loop and the result is the exact same.
Addition: The above code was only to demonstrate a 'clearer' problem alike. To make it clear; my problem is NOT that I still can get a hold of the process by Process.GetProcessesByName( "testprogram" ); after it set HasExited to true.
The real problem is that the program I am running externally writes a file -just before- it terminates (gracefully). I use HasExited to check when the process has finished and thus I know I can read the file (because the process exited!), but it seems that HasExited returns true even sometimes when the program has NOT written the file to disk yet. Here's example code that illustrates the exact problem:
// Start the program
process.Start();
while (!process.HasExited)
Thread.Sleep( 500 );
// Could also be process.WaitForExit(), makes no difference to the result
// Now the process has quit, I can read the file it has exported
if ( !File.Exists( xmlFile ) )
{
// But this exception is thrown occasionally, why?
throw new Exception("xml file not found");
}

I realize this is an old post, but in my quest to find out why my app running the Exited event before the app had even opened I found out something that I though might be useful to people experiencing this problem in the future.
When a process is started, it is assigned a PID. If the User is then prompted with the User Account Control dialog and selects 'Yes', the process is re-started and assigned a new PID.
I sat with this for a few hours, hopefully this can save someone time.

I would suggest you to try this way:
process.Start();
while (!process.HasExited)
{
// Discard cached information about the process.
process.Refresh();
// Just a little check!
Console.WriteLine("Physical Memory Usage: " + process.WorkingSet64.ToString());
Thread.Sleep(500);
}
foreach (Process current in Process.GetProcessesByName("testprogram"))
{
if ((current.Id == process.Id) && !current.HasExited)
throw new Exception("Oh oh!");
}
Anyway... in MSDN page of HasExited I'm reading the following hightlighted note:
When standard output has been redirected to asynchronous event
handlers, it is possible that output processing will not have
completed when this property returns true. To ensure that asynchronous
event handling has been completed, call the WaitForExit() overload
that takes no parameter before checking HasExited.
That could be somehow linked to your problem as you are redirecting everything.

I know, this is an old post but maybe I can help someone. The Process class may behave unexpectedly. HasExited will return true if the process has exited or if the process runs with administrator privileges and your program only has user privileges.
I have posted a question regarding this a while back here, but did not receive a satisfiable answer.

First off, are you sure testprogram does not spawn a process of its own and exit without waiting for that process to finish? We're dealing with some kind of race condition here, and testprogram can be significant.
Second point I'd like to make is about this - "I need to be absolutely sure that this logfile exists". Well, there is no such thing. You can make your check, and then the file is gone. The common way to address this is not to check, but rather to do what you want to do with the file. Go ahead, read it, catch exceptions, retry if the thing seems unstable and you don't want to change anything. The functional check-and-do does not work well if you have more than one actor (thread or whatever) in the system.
A bunch of random ideas follows.
Have you tried using FileSystemWatcher and not depending on process completion?
Does it get any better if you try reading the file (not checking if it exists, but acting instead) in the process.Exited event? [it shouldn't]
Is the system healthy? Anything suspicious in the Event Log?
Can some really aggressive antivirus policy be involved?
(Can't tell much without seeing all the code and looking into testprogram.)

So just for a further investigation into the root cause of the problem you should maybe check out what's really happening by using Process Monitor. Simply start it and include the external program and your own tool and let it record what happens.
Within the log you should see how the external tool writes to the output file and how you open that file. But within this log you should see in which order all these accesses happen.
The first thing that came to my mind is that the Process class doesn't lie and the process is really gone when it tells so. So problem is that at this point in time it seems that the file is still not fully available. I think this is a problem of the OS, cause it holds some parts of the file still within a cache that is not fully written onto the disk and the tool has simply exited itself without flushing its file handles.
With this in mind you should see within the log that the external tool created the file, exited and AFTER that the file will be flushed/closed (by the OS [maybe remove any filters when you found this point within the log]).
So if my assumptions are correct the root cause would be the bad behavior of your external tool which you can't change thus leading to simply wait a little bit after the process has exited and hope that the timeout is long enough to get the file flushed/closed by the OS (maybe try to open the file in a loop with a timeout till it succeeded).

There's two possibilities, the process object continues to hold a reference to the process, so it has exited, but it hasn't yet been deleted. Or you have a second instance of the process running. You should also compare the process Id to make sure. Try this.
....
// Start the program
process.Start();
while (!process.HasExited)
Thread.Sleep( 500 );
Process[] p = Process.GetProcessesByName( "testprogram" );
if ( p.Length != 0 && p[0].Id == process.id && ! p[0].HasExited)
throw new Exception("Oh oh");

For a start, is there an issue with using Process.WaitForExit rather than polling it?
Anyway, it is technically possible for the process to exit from a usable point of view but the process still be around briefly while it does stuff like flush disk cache. Is the log file especially large (or any operation it is performing heavy on disk writes)?

As per MSDN documentation for HasExited.
If a handle is open to the process,
the operating system releases the
process memory when the process has
exited, but retains administrative
information about the process, such as
the handle, exit code, and exit time.
Probably not related, but it's worth noting.
If it's only a problem 1/10 of the time, and the process disappears after a second anyway, depending on your usage of HasExited, try just adding another delay after the HasExited check works, like
while (!process.HasExited)
DoStuff();
Thread.Sleep(500);
Cleanup();
and see if the problem persists.
Personally, I've always just used the Exited event handler instead of any kind of polling, and a simplistic custom wrapper around System.Diagnostics.Process to handle things like thread safety, wrapping a call to CloseMainWindow() followed by WaitForExit(timeout) and finally Kill(), logging, et cetera, and never encountered a problem.

Maybe the problem is in the testprogram? Does this code nicely flush/close etc.? It seems to me if testprogram writes a file to disk, the file should at least be available (empty or not)

If you have web application, and your external program/process is generating files (write to disk) check if your IIS have rights to write to that folder if not on properties security add permission for your IIS user, that was the reason in my case, i was receiving process.HasExited =true, but produced files from the process was not completed, after struggling for a while i add full permissions to the folder where process was writhing and process.Refresh() as Zarathos described from above and everything was working as expected.

Use process_name.Refresh() before checking whether process has exited or not. Refresh() will clear all the cached information related to the process.