I'm getting a strange error on a SharpDX program I made.
The program contains one form MainForm, which inherits from SharpDX.Windows.RenderForm (I'm doing Direct3D 9). I have some logic that kills the program by calling MainForm.Close(), and it works perfectly.
However, when I close the form with the X button, or by double clicking the top left corner of the screen, the program ends with code -1073610751 (0xc0020001).
This is a relatively minor annoyance, because it only happens when the program is finishing, so it doesn't really matter if it exits with an error, because it is actually finishing.
However, this error does not happen when I set a breakpoint at the last line of my Main(). If I do so, and then close the window as I explained, the breakpoint gets hit, and resuming ends the program with code 0.
Apart from SharpDX and one pure C DLL I am calling to one-shot process some data, I am not doing mixed code, or any other weird stuff.
I've looked around, but this code appears to be related to string bindings? other people seem to have this problem when doing weird mixed C++/CLI stuff, but I'm not doing anything like that.
Any ideas? at least on how to get more concise information on this error code?
It is a very low-level RPC error. Which is likely to be used in your program, it is the underlying protocol on top of which COM runs. There are plenty of candidates, SharpDX itself uses the COM interop layer to make DirectX calls. And DirectX itself is very likely to make such kind of calls to your video driver.
It is also the kind of error code you'd expect to get triggered if there's a shutdown-order problem. Like using a COM interface after it was already released. Shutting down a program cleanly can be a difficult problem to solve, especially when there are lots of threads. There are in any DirectX app. It is also very easy to ignore such a problem, even if it is known and recorded in somebody's bug database. Because, as you noted, the program otherwise shuts down okay without any nasty exceptions. RPC already prevented it from blowing up, you are seeing the error code it generated.
There's very little you can do yourself about this problem, this is code you did not write and you'll never find the programmer who did. If you see a first-chance exception notification in the Output window then you could enable the unmanaged debugger, use Debug + Exceptions and tick the Thrown checkbox for Win32 exception, enable the Microsoft Symbol server and you'll get a stack trace when the exception is thrown. Beware this will be in the bowels of native code with no source to look at. But it could pin-point the DLL that's causing the problem. Still nothing you can do to fix that DLL. I'd recommend a video driver update, the most common source of trouble. That's about as far as you can take it.
Related
I built an add-on to Microsoft Word. When the user clicks a button, it runs a number of processes that export a list of Microsoft Word documents to Filtered HTML. This works fine.
Where the code falls down is in processing large amounts of files. After the file conversions are done and I call the next function, the app crashes and I get this information from Visual Studio:
Managed Debugging Assistant 'DisconnectedContext' has detected a problem in 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\WINWORD.EXE'.
Additional information: Transition into COM context 0x56255b88 for
this RuntimeCallableWrapper failed with the following error: System
call failed. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80010100
(RPC_E_SYS_CALL_FAILED)). This is typically because the COM context
0x56255b88 where this RuntimeCallableWrapper was created has been
disconnected or it is busy doing something else. Releasing the
interfaces from the current COM context (COM context 0x56255cb0). This
may cause corruption or data loss. To avoid this problem, please
ensure that all COM contexts/apartments/threads stay alive and are
available for context transition, until the application is completely
done with the RuntimeCallableWrappers that represents COM components
that live inside them.
After some testing, I realized that if I simply remove all the code after the file conversions, there are no problems. To resolve this, I place the remainder of my code in yet another button.
The problem is I don't want to give the user two buttons. After reading various other threads, it sounds like my code has a memory or threading issue. The answers I am reading do not help me truly understand what to do next.
I feel like this is what I want to do:
1- Run conversion.
2- Close thread/cleanup memory issue from conversion.
3- Continue running code.
Unfortunately, I really don't know how to do #2 or if it is even possible. Your help is very much appreciated.
or it is busy doing something else
The managed debugging assistant diagnostic you got is pretty gobbledygooky but that's the part of the message that accurately describes the real problem. You have a firehose problem, the 3rd most common issue associated with threading. The mishap is hard to diagnose because this goes wrong inside the Word plumbing and not your code.
Trying not to commit the same gobbledygook sin myself, what goes wrong is that the interop calls you make into the Office program are queued, waiting for their turn to get executed. The underlying "system call" that the error code hints at is PostMessage(). Wherever there is a queue, there is a risk that the queue gets too large. Happens when the producer (your program) is adding items too the queue far faster than the consumer (the Office program) removes them. The firehose problem. Unless the producer slows down, the queue will grow without bounds and something is going to fail if it is allowed to grow endlessly, at a minimum the process runs out of memory.
It is not allowed to get close to that problem. The underlying queue that PostMessage() uses is protected by the OS. Windows fails the call when the queue already contains 10,000 messages. That's a fatal error that RPC does not know how to recover from, or rather should not try to recover from. Something is amiss and it isn't pretty. It returns an error code to your program to tell you about it. That's RPC_E_SYS_CALL_FAILED. Nothing much better happens in your program, the CLR doesn't know how to recover from it either, nor does your code. So the show is over, the interop call you made got lost and was not executed by Word.
Finding a completely reliable workaround for this awkward problem is not that straight-forward. Beware that this can happen on any interop call, so catching the exception and trying again is pretty drastically unpractical. But do keep in mind that the Q+D fix is very simple. The plain problem is that your program is running too fast, slowing it down with a Thread.Sleep() or Task.Delay() call is quite crude but will always fix the issue. Well, assuming you delay enough.
I think, but don't know for a fact because nobody ever posts repro code, that this issue is also associated with using a console mode app or a worker thread in your program. If it is a console mode app then try applying the [STAThread] attribute to your Main() method. If it is a worker thread then call Thread.SetApartmentState() before starting the thread, but beware it is very important to also create the Application interface on that worker thread. Not otherwise a workaround for an add-in.
If neither of those workarounds is effective or too unpractical then consider that you can automagically slow your program down, and ensure the queue is emptied, by occasionally reading something back from the Office program. Something silly, any property getter call will do. Necessarily you can't get the property value until the Office program catches up. That can still fail, there is also a 60 second time-out on the interop call. But that's something you can fix, you can call CoRegisterMessageFilter() in your program to install a callback that runs when the timeout trips. Very gobbledygooky as well, but the cut-and-paste code is readily available.
I have a windows application that calls an external .dll. After a while, there were fatal errors being brought to my attention that had to do with user marshaling. There was a source online that with that particular error I was to change my target to x86 rather than AnyCPU. I did so, and now whenever I let the app run, it will exit debug mode and crash the application. But if I set a break point immediately after the .dll call, and step over each line until I receive control of the application again, it doesn't crash. Is there anything specific that could be causing this? Has does one debug this issue?
Thanks!
Stepping code solving an issue is often a symptom of timing problems in the original code. If an external resource loads asynchronously, it will not show up on the stack of the current thread in the debugger, but will be able to be called. Stepping over code induces a delay in the flow.
Thank you all for you suggestions! Fortunately, I ended up getting it to work (with minimal understanding as to why it works) but changing the build target to specifically x86 machines rather than "AnyCPU." This was suggested by a website and can no longer find :\ Hope this helps others than run into a similar issue!
I consider the most common cause of this sort of thing to be uninitialized variables. They pick up whatever was in memory and the presence of a debugger can easily change what's in the unused part of the stack--the memory that's going to become local variables when the next routine is called. Check the DLLs code.
Note that your "fix" makes me even more suspect that this is the real answer.
(Then there's also the really crazy case of a problem with the debugger. Long ago I hit a case where the debugger had no problem loading an invalid value into a segment register if you were single stepping.)
In all WPF application I develop there is a global exception handler subscribed to AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException which logs everything it can find and then shows a dialog box telling the user to contact the author, where the log file is etc. This works extremely well and both clients and me are very happy with it because it allows fixing problems fast.
However during development of a mixed WPF / C# / CLI / C++ application there are sometimes application crashes that do not make it to the aforementioned exception handler. Instead, a standard windows dialog box saying "XXX hast stopped working" pops up. In the details it shows eg
Problem Event Name: BEX
Application Name: XXX.exe
Fault Module Name: clr.dll
...
This mostly happens when calling back a managed function from within umanaged code, and when that function updates the screen. I didn't took me long to figure out the root cause of problem, but only because I can reproduce the crash at my machine and hook up the debugger: in all occasions the native thread was still at the point of calling the function pointer to the managed delegate that calls directly into C#/WPF code.
The real problem would be when this happens on a client machine: given that usually clients are not the best error reporters out there it migh take very, very long to figure out what is wrong when all they can provide me are the details above.
The question: what can I do to get more information for crashes like these? Is there a way to get an exception like this call a custom error handler anyway? Or get a process dump? When loading the symbols for msvcr100_clr0004.dll and clr.dll (loaded on the thread where the break occurrs), the call stack is like this:
msvcr100_clr0400.dll!__crt_debugger_hook()
clr.dll!___report_gsfailure() + 0xeb bytes
clr.dll!_DoJITFailFast#0() + 0x8 bytes
clr.dll!CrawlFrame::CheckGSCookies() + 0x2c3b72 bytes
Can I somehow hook some native C++ code into __crt_debugger_hook() (eg for writing a minidump)? Which leads me to an additional question: how does CheckGSCookies behave on a machine with no debugger installed, would it still call the same code?
update some clarification on the code: native C++ calls a CLI delegate (to which a native function pointer is acquired using GetFunctionPointerForDelegate which in turn calls a C# System.Action. This Action updates a string (bound to a WPF label) and raises a propertychanged event. This somehow invokes a buffer overflow (when updating very fast) in an unnamed thread that was not created directly in my code.
update looking into SetUnhandledExceptionFilter, which didn't do anything at first, I found this nifty article explaining how to catch any exception. It works, and I was able to write a minidump in an exception filter installed by using that procedure. The dump gives basically the same information as hooking the debugger: the real problem seems to be that the Status string is being overwritten (by being called from the native thread) while at the same time being read from the ui thread. All nice ans such, but it does require dll hooking which is not my favorite method to solve things. Another way would still be nice.
The .NET 4 version of the CLR has protection against buffer overflow attacks. The basic scheme is that the code writes a "cookie" at the end of an array or stack frame, then checks later if that cookie still has the original value. If it has changed, the runtime assumes that malware has compromised the program state and immediately aborts the program. This kind of abort does not go through the usual unhandled exception mechanism, that would be too exploitable.
The odds that your program is really being attacked are small of course. Much more likely is that your native code has a pointer bug and scribbles junk into a CLR structure or stack frame. Debugging that isn't easy, the damage is usually done well before the crash. One approach is to comment out code until the crash disappears.
I'm getting close to desperate.. I am developing a field service application for Windows Mobile 6.1 using C# and quite some p/Invoking. (I think I'm referencing about 50 native functions)
On normal circumstances this goes without any problem, but when i start stressing the GC i'm getting a nasty 0xC0000005 error witch seems uncatchable. In my test i'm rapidly closing and opening a dialog form (the form did make use of native functions, but for testing i commented these out) and after a while the Windows Mobile error reporter comes around to tell me that there was an fatal error in my application.
My code uses a try-catch around the Application.Run(masterForm); and hooks into the CurrentDomain.UnhandledException event, but the application still crashes. Even when i attach the debugger, visual studio just tells me "The remote connection to the device has been lost" when the exception occurs..
Since I didn't succeed to catch the exception in the managed environment, I tried to make sense out of the Error Reporter log file. But this doesn't make any sense, the only consistent this about the error is the application where it occurs in.
The thread where the application occurs in is unknown to me, the module where the error occurs differs from time to time (I've seen my application.exe, WS2.dll, netcfagl3_5.dll and mscoree3_5.dll), even the error code is not always the same. (most of the time it's 0xC0000005, but i've also seen an 0X80000002 error, which is a warning accounting the first byte?)
I tried debugging through bugtrap, but strangely enough this crashes with the same error code (0xC0000005). I tried to open the kdmp file with visual studio, but i can't seem to make any sense out of this because it only shows me disassembler code when i step into the error (unless i have the right .pbb files, which i don't). Same goes for WinDbg.
To make a long story short: I frankly don't have a single clue where to look for this error, and I'm hoping some bright soul on stackoverflow does. I'm happy to provide some code but at this moment I don't know which piece to provide..
Any help is greatly appreciated!
[EDIT May 3rd 2010]
As you can see in my comment to Hans I retested the whole program after I uncommented all P/Invokes, but that did not solve my problem. I tried reproducing the error with as little code as possible and eventually it looks like multi-threaded access is the one giving me all the problems.
In my application I have a usercontrol that functions as a finger / flick scroll list. In this control I use a bitmap for each item in the list as a canvas. Drawing on this canvas is handled by a separate thread and when i disable this thread, the error seems to disappear.. I'll do some more tests on this and will post the results here.
Catching this exception is not an option. It is the worst kind of heart attack a thread can suffer, the CPU has detected a serious problem and cannot continue running code. This is invariably caused by misbehaving unmanaged code, it sounds like you've got plenty of it running in your program. You need to focus on debugging that unmanaged code to get somewhere.
The two most common causes of an AV are
Heap corruption. The unmanaged code has written data to the heap improperly, destroying the structural integrity of the heap. Typically caused by overflowing the boundary of an allocated block of memory. Or using a heap block after it was freed. Very hard to diagnose, the exception will be raised long after the damage was done.
Stack corruption. Most typically caused by overflowing the boundaries of an array that was allocated on the stack. This can overwrite the values of other variables on the stack or destroy the function return address. A bit easier to diagnose, it tends to repeat well and has an immediate effect. One side-effect is that the debugger loses its ability to display the call stack right after the damage was done.
Heap corruption is the likely one and the hard one. This is most typically tackled by debugging the code in the debug build with a debug allocator that watches the integrity of the heap. The <crtdbg.h> header provides one. It's not a guaranteed approach, you can have some really nasty Heisenbugs that only rear their head in the Release build. Very few options available then, other than careful code review. Good luck, you'll need it.
It turns out to be an exception caused by Interlocked.
In my code there is an integer _drawThreadIsRunning which is set to 1 when the draw-thread is running, and set to 0 otherwise. I set this value using Interlocked:
if (Interlocked.Exchange(ref _drawThreadIsRunning, 1) == 0) { /* run thread */ }
When i change this line the whole thing works, so it seems that there is a problem with threadsafety somewhere, but i can't figure it out. (ie. i don't want to waste more time figuring it out)
Thanks for the help guys!
I have a multithreaded .Net C# application, it uses Direct3D 9/10 and XAudio2. (Direct3D is accessed by only one thread, same for XAudio2. Direct3D isn't the problem cause the error is manifest in either DX9 or DX10 mode without any change in its behaviour.)
Sometimes (there are some areas that gives this problem randomly) this application crash in a rather unspectacular way. Even if the application is started through visual studio with debugger it crash without giving ANY kind of exception. (It start by saying "applicationname.svchost.exe is crashed, etc..etc..Do you want to debug?", if I press yes it tells me "you cannot debug an application already closed.)
There is no way to find out what's the cause of the crash? Cause i've run out of ideas, the debugger isn't giving me any information at all. Without an exception I can't even do a stacktrace or a dump. :P (I'm supposing is a synchronization problem (even thought in that area I'm only doing sequential work...), but hey why isn't launching an exception? :|)
In the areas where the problem occurs I'm unloading a reloading a series of classes related to a novel (in a sequential core thread, so I doubt it can be an issue) and starting a new music through XAudio2. (BTW, what are the multithreading consideration about XAudio2? Is it safe to call from multiple thread?)
Thanks for the help.
P.S. There is a software to attach to mine to monitor all the calls and tells me what's the last call before the crash?
You should try using Windbg, analyzing the crash dump should point you to the problem, if your suspicion is right and it is a synchronization problem, the cause of the problem may be hard to spot.
Have you checked Event Logs in your Windows Administration Panel?
All error of any kind are always logged in this section with minimal details.
One time I had an application that was crashing without exceptions and the only help I found was the Event Log Viewer where I discovered that the source of the crash was a StackOverflowException.