I'm wondering if there is a difference between GLSL and HLSL Mathematics.
I'm using a selfmade Engine which works with openTK fine. My SharpDx Implementation gets everyday a bit further.
I'm currently working on the ModelviewProjection Matrix.
To see if it works I use a simple project which works fine with OpenTK.
So I changed the Shader code from GLSL to HLSL because the rest of the program uses the engine functions. The programm did not work I couldn't see the geometry, so I changed the Modelview Matrix and the Projections Matrix to the Identity Matrix. Aftwards it worked I saw the geometry. So I changed a bit of the GLSL becuase I wanted a similar GLSL code to the HLSL and I also changed the Matrixes to the identy too. Afterwards I did not see anything it didn't work.... So I'm stuck... Any of you have an Idea?
Anyways long story short
My HLSL Shader Code
public string Vs = #"cbuffer Variables : register(b0){
float4 Testfarbe;
float4x4 FUSEE_MVP;
}
struct VS_IN
{
float4 pos : POSITION;
float4 tex : TEXCOORD;
float4 normal : NORMAL;
};
struct PS_IN
{
float4 pos : SV_POSITION;
float4 col : COLOR;
float4 tex : TEXCOORD;
float4 normal : NORMAL;
};
PS_IN VS( VS_IN input )
{
PS_IN output = (PS_IN)0;
input.pos.w = 1.0f;
output.pos = mul(input.pos,FUSEE_MVP);
output.col = Testfarbe;
/*output.col = FUSEE_MV._m00_m01_m02_m03;*/
/* output.normal = input.normal;
output.tex = input.tex;*/
/* if (FUSEE_MV._m00 == 4.0f)
output.col = float4(1,0,0,1);
else
output.col = float4(0,0,1,1);*/
return output;
}
";
string Ps = #"
SamplerState pictureSampler;
Texture2D imageFG;
struct PS_IN
{
float4 pos : SV_POSITION;
float4 col : COLOR;
float4 tex : TEXCOORD;
float4 normal : NORMAL;
};
float4 PS( PS_IN input ) : SV_Target
{
return input.col;
/*return imageFG.Sample(pictureSampler,input.tex);*/
}";
So I changed my old working OpenTk project to see where the difference ist between openTK and SharpDx relating to the math calculations.
The HLSL code
public string Vs = #"
/* Copies incoming vertex color without change.
* Applies the transformation matrix to vertex position.
*/
attribute vec4 fuColor;
attribute vec3 fuVertex;
attribute vec3 fuNormal;
attribute vec2 fuUV;
varying vec4 vColor;
varying vec3 vNormal;
varying vec2 vUV;
uniform mat4 FUSEE_MVP;
uniform mat4 FUSEE_ITMV;
void main()
{
gl_Position = FUSEE_MVP * vec4(fuVertex, 1.0);
/*vNormal = mat3(FUSEE_ITMV[0].xyz, FUSEE_ITMV[1].xyz, FUSEE_ITMV[2].xyz) * fuNormal;*/
vUV = fuUV;
}";
public string Ps = #"
/* Copies incoming fragment color without change. */
#ifdef GL_ES
precision highp float;
#endif
uniform vec4 vColor;
varying vec3 vNormal;
void main()
{
gl_FragColor = vColor * dot(vNormal, vec3(0, 0, 1));
}";
In the main code itself I only read an Obj file and set the Identity matrix
public override void Init()
{
Mesh = MeshReader.LoadMesh(#"Assets/Teapot.obj.model");
//ShaderProgram sp = RC.CreateShader(Vs, Ps);
sp = RC.CreateShader(Vs, Ps);
_vTextureParam = sp.GetShaderParam("Testfarbe");//vColor
}
public override void RenderAFrame()
{
...
var mtxRot = float4x4.CreateRotationY(_angleHorz) * float4x4.CreateRotationX(_angleVert);
var mtxCam = float4x4.LookAt(0, 200, 500, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0);
// first mesh
RC.ModelView = float4x4.CreateTranslation(0, -50, 0) * mtxRot * float4x4.CreateTranslation(-150, 0, 0) * mtxCam;
RC.SetShader(sp);
//mapping
RC.SetShaderParam(_vTextureParam, new float4(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f));
RC.Render(Mesh);
Present();
}
public override void Resize()
{
RC.Viewport(0, 0, Width, Height);
float aspectRatio = Width / (float)Height;
RC.Projection = float4x4.CreatePerspectiveFieldOfView(MathHelper.PiOver4, aspectRatio, 1, 5000);
}
The both programs side by side
What I should also add is as soon as the values of my ModelView identity are bigger than 1.5 I don't see anything in my window ? anyone knows that might causing this?
I edited the Post and the Image so you see a bigger difference.
I had earlier in this post the identity Matrix. If I use the Identity Matrix with this Obj-File
v 0.0 0.5 0.5
v 0.5 0.0 0.5
v -0.5 0.0 0.5
vt 1 0 0
vt 0 1 0
vt 0 0 0
f 1/2 2/3 3/1
I saw in my SharpDX project the triangle and in my openTK not. But I tink the Teapot thing is a bit better to show the difference within the to project where only the Shadercode is different! I mean I could've done something wrong in the SharpDX Implementation for this Enginge but lets assume their is everything right. At least I hope so if you guys tell my the ShaderCode is just wrong ;)
I hope I could describe my problem clear so you understand it.
OK So you've to Transpose the Matrix...
Related
I am working on a cel shader for a uni project that I would like to only be affected by scene lights over x intensity. I am struggling in figuring out how to implement this within the code. The code I have been working with I found online, and have been using it to test and understand how shaders work. I am unsure if I need to implement some kind of conditional statement? Some of the information I have read has said that using conditional statements within shaders makes for poor performance.
I am new to shaders and any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance :)
ps. I am limited to using Unity 2018.3.8
Properties {
[Header(Base Parameters)]
_Color ("Tint", Color) = (0, 0, 0, 1)
_MainTex ("Texture", 2D) = "white" {}
[HDR] _Emission ("Emission", color) = (0, 0, 0, 1)
[HDR]
_SpecularColor("Specular Color", Color) = (0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 1)
// Controls the size of the specular reflection.
_Glossiness("Glossiness", Float) = 32
[HDR]
_RimColor("Rim Color", Color) = (1,1,1,1)
_RimAmount("Rim Amount", Range(0, 1)) = 0.716
// Control how smoothly the rim blends when approaching unlit
// parts of the surface.
_RimThreshold("Rim Threshold", Range(0, 1)) = 0.1
}
SubShader {
Tags{ "RenderType"="Opaque" "Queue"="Geometry"}
CGPROGRAM
#pragma surface surf Stepped fullforwardshadows
#pragma target 3.0
sampler2D _MainTex;
fixed4 _Color;
half3 _Emission;
float4 _SpecularColor;
float _Glossiness;
float4 _RimColor;
float _RimAmount;
float _RimThreshold;
float3 worldPos;
float4 LightingStepped(SurfaceOutput s, float3 lightDir, half3 viewDir, float shadowAttenuation){
float shadow = shadowAttenuation;
s.Normal=normalize(s.Normal);
float diff = dot(s.Normal, lightDir);
float towardsLightChange = fwidth(diff);
float lightIntensity = smoothstep(0, towardsLightChange, diff);
float3 diffuse = _LightColor0.rgb * lightIntensity * s.Albedo;
float diffussAvg = (diffuse.r + diffuse.g + diffuse.b) / 3;
float3 halfVector = normalize(viewDir + lightDir);
float NdotH = dot(s.Normal, halfVector);
float specularIntensity = pow(NdotH * lightIntensity, _Glossiness * _Glossiness);
float specularIntensitySmooth = smoothstep(0.005, 0.01, specularIntensity);
float3 specular = specularIntensitySmooth * _SpecularColor.rgb * diffussAvg;
float rimDot = 1 - dot(viewDir, s.Normal);
float rimIntensity = rimDot * pow(dot(lightDir, s.Normal), _RimThreshold);
rimIntensity = smoothstep(_RimAmount - 0.01, _RimAmount + 0.01, rimIntensity);
float3 rim = rimIntensity * _RimColor.rgb * diffussAvg;
float4 color;
color.rgb = (diffuse + specular + rim) * shadow;
color.a = s.Alpha;
return color;
}
struct Input {
float2 uv_MainTex;
float3 worldPos;
};
void surf (Input i, inout SurfaceOutput o) {
worldPos = i.worldPos;
fixed4 col = tex2D(_MainTex, i.uv_MainTex);
col *= _Color;
o.Albedo = col.rgb;
o.Alpha = col.a;
o.Emission = _Emission;
}
ENDCG
}
FallBack "Standard"
}
So what I'm trying to do is load satellite images from an SQL table and wrap them around a sphere to create a globe. I know I've got loading the images covered, I'm just not sure how to make my shader display the images in the correct orientation.
I've gone to the Unity Forums as well as checked out this code from the Unity Docs.
Using the linked shader code and the help I received on the forums, here's the code I've ended up with:
Properties
{
_MainTexArray("Tex", 2DArray) = "" {}
_SliceRange("Slices", Range(0,32)) = 6
_UVScale("UVScale", Float) = 1
_COLUMNS("Columns", Range(0, 5)) = 1
_ROWS("Rows", Range(0, 5)) = 1
_CELLS("Cells", Range(0, 32)) = 16
}
SubShader
{
Pass
{
CGPROGRAM
#pragma vertex vert
#pragma fragment frag
// texture arrays are not available everywhere,
// only compile shader on platforms where they are
#pragma require 2darray
#include "UnityCG.cginc"
struct v2f
{
float3 uv : TEXCOORD0;
float4 vertex : SV_POSITION;
};
float _SliceRange;
float _UVScale;
v2f vert(float4 vertex : POSITION)
{
v2f o;
o.vertex = UnityObjectToClipPos(vertex);
o.uv.xy = (vertex.xy + 0.5) * _UVScale;
o.uv.z = (vertex.z + 0.5) * _SliceRange;
return o;
}
float _COLUMNS; //Columns and rows only go between 0 and 1
float _ROWS;
float _CELLS;
UNITY_DECLARE_TEX2DARRAY(_MainTexArray);
half4 frag(v2f i) : SV_Target
{
float3 uv = float3(i.uv.x * _CELLS, i.uv.y * _CELLS, 0);
uv.z = floor(i.uv.x / _COLUMNS) * floor(i.uv.y / _ROWS);
return UNITY_SAMPLE_TEX2DARRAY(_MainTexArray, uv / _CELLS);
}
ENDCG
}
}
Using that I've gotten my materials to look like this:
Here's the code that I'm using to load the SQL images:
textures = new Texture2D[size];
for (int x = 0; x <= 7; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y <= 3; y++)
{
textures[count] = tiler.Read(x, y, 2); //The z determines the zoom level, so I wouldn't want them all loaded at once
if (textures[count] != null) TextureScale.Bilinear(textures[count], 256, 256);
count++;
}
}
texArr = new Texture2DArray(256, 256, textures.Length, TextureFormat.RGBA32, true, true);
texArr.filterMode = FilterMode.Bilinear;
texArr.wrapMode = TextureWrapMode.Repeat;
for (int i = 0; i < textures.Length; i++)
{
if (textures[i] == null) continue;
texArr.SetPixels(textures[i].GetPixels(0), i, 0);
}
texArr.Apply();
mat.SetTexture("_MainTexArray", texArr);
In the SQL Table, the x and y determines the position of the tile and the z determines the zoom level. I'm just working with one zoom level for now.
Sorry for linking the whole shader class, but I'm not very experienced with shaders so I don't quite know where the problem lies.
If you can index into the array of photos such that you effectively have an equirectangular projection of the globe, you could try using a modified form of the shader code by Farfarer from the Unity forums copied and modified slightly below:
Shader "Custom/Equirectangular" {
Properties{
_MainTexArray("Tex", 2DArray) = "" {}
_COLUMNS("Columns", Int) = 2
_ROWS("Rows", Int) = 2
}
SubShader{
Pass {
Tags {"LightMode" = "Always"}
CGPROGRAM
#pragma vertex vert
#pragma fragment frag
#pragma require 2darray
#include "UnityCG.cginc"
struct appdata {
float4 vertex : POSITION;
float3 normal : NORMAL;
};
struct v2f
{
float4 pos : SV_POSITION;
float3 normal : TEXCOORD0;
};
v2f vert(appdata v)
{
v2f o;
o.pos = UnityObjectToClipPos(v.vertex);
o.normal = v.normal;
return o;
}
UNITY_DECLARE_TEX2DARRAY(_MainTexArray);
int _ROWS;
int _COLUMNS;
#define PI 3.141592653589793
inline float2 RadialCoords(float3 a_coords)
{
float3 a_coords_n = normalize(a_coords);
float lon = atan2(a_coords_n.z, a_coords_n.x);
float lat = acos(a_coords_n.y);
float2 sphereCoords = float2(lon, lat) * (1.0 / PI);
return float2(sphereCoords.x * 0.5 + 0.5, 1 - sphereCoords.y);
}
float4 frag(v2f IN) : COLOR
{
float2 equiUV = RadialCoords(IN.normal);
float2 texIndex;
float2 uvInTex = modf(equiUV * float2(_COLUMNS,_ROWS), texIndex);
int flatTexIndex = texIndex.x * _ROWS + texIndex.y;
return UNITY_SAMPLE_TEX2DARRAY(_MainTexArray,
float3(uvInTex, flatTexIndex));
}
ENDCG
}
}
FallBack "VertexLit"
}
You also need to use
texArr = new Texture2DArray(256, 256, textures.Length, TextureFormat.RGBA32, false, true);
instead of
texArr = new Texture2DArray(256, 256, textures.Length, TextureFormat.RGBA32, true, false);
It works for me if I attach this script to a sphere:
Material myMat;
public List<Texture2D> texes;
IEnumerator Start()
{
yield return null;
myMat = GetComponent<Renderer>().material;
Texture2DArray texArr = new Texture2DArray(256, 256, 9,
TextureFormat.RGBA32, false, true);
texArr.filterMode = FilterMode.Bilinear;
texArr.wrapMode = TextureWrapMode.Clamp;
for (int i = 0 ; i < texes.Count ; i++)
{
texArr.SetPixels(texes[i].GetPixels(), i, 0);
}
texArr.Apply();
myMat.SetTexture("_MainTexArray", texArr);
}
and in texes I add these textures in order:
0:
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
and set 3 for Rows and Columns, it produces decent results:
If bilinear filtering is enabled, there are still some artifacts at the borders of the textures. But these artifacts have to be zoomed in quite close to see. Due to the lack of adjacent pixels for bilinear filtering they mostly appear as improperly blended or missing pixels:
Of course this example doesn't properly tile so there is an obvious seam along one longitude line:
Since this setup expects normals from a sphere, this only works on things with normals that approximate those of a sphere. So it would not render properly on a plane, for instance.
Okay, so this problem is kinda huge, and for the same reason i would rather post as little code as possible, but rather have you come with ideas as to what it could be. I will post the codere where i feel the problem could be. If you would like to see more just ask and i will provide it.
So, i just "stole" a shader for my game. By stole i mean found a tutorial that i had done before, and just copied the end result. Thus i know the shader should work, because i've used it before.
I have a custom mesh class, and also a custom vertex struct. I have never done a xertex struct before so initially i thought this is where the problem was.
But i have some counterarguments i later found:
All of their variables seems to be right, and everything works except the bump-mapping.
Changing the Tangent and/or binormal seems to have no effect on the shading what-so-ever. So i think the mistake is not in how they are calulated, but rather how they are used.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/838/w6kv.png/
This is the output i get. Keep in mind that this is a voxel engine. As you can see all the boxes has the same wierd normal-map shadow. However this is the normal map:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/268/r7jt.jpg/
As you can see, they don't fit whatsoever. Now, this could be one of three things as i see it:
It could be the way i set up the shader in xna.
It could also be something in the vertex struct
It could also be the way i call the actual drawing function.
So here's the code for those three things (And the shader as well):
Shader Setup:
((Here i set up the data for the shader, and the draw the mesh))
// Bind the parameters with the shader.
BBS.Parameters["World"].SetValue(Matrix.Identity);
BBS.Parameters["View"].SetValue(camera.viewMatrix);
BBS.Parameters["Projection"].SetValue(camera.projectionMatrix);
BBS.Parameters["AmbientColor"].SetValue(Color.White.ToVector4());
BBS.Parameters["AmbientIntensity"].SetValue(0.5f);
Vector3 LD = new Vector3(0, 1, -1);
LD.Normalize();
BBS.Parameters["DiffuseColor"].SetValue(Color.White.ToVector4());
BBS.Parameters["DiffuseIntensity"].SetValue(0);
BBS.Parameters["LightDirection"].SetValue(LD);
BBS.Parameters["EyePosition"].SetValue(new Vector3(0.0f, 2.0f, 5.0f));
BBS.Parameters["SpecularColor"].SetValue(Color.White.ToVector4());
BBS.Parameters["ColorMap"].SetValue(cubeTexture);
BBS.Parameters["NormalMap"].SetValue(Content.Load<Texture2D>("images"));
BBS.CurrentTechnique = BBS.Techniques["Technique1"];
for (int i = 0; i < BBS.CurrentTechnique.Passes.Count; i++)
{
//EffectPass.Apply will update the device to
//begin using the state information defined in the current pass
BBS.CurrentTechnique.Passes[i].Apply();
//theMesh contains all of the information required to draw
//the current mesh
graphics.DrawUserPrimitives(PrimitiveType.TriangleList, Mesh.Vertices, 0, Mesh.NUM_TRIANGLES);
}
Vertex struct:
public struct VertexPositionNormalTangentBinormalTexture : IVertexType
{
public Vector3 Position;
public Vector3 Normal;
public Vector2 TextureCoordinate;
public Vector3 Tangent;
public Vector3 Binormal;
public static readonly VertexDeclaration VertexElements = new VertexDeclaration
(
new VertexElement(0, VertexElementFormat.Vector3, VertexElementUsage.Position, 0),
new VertexElement(12, VertexElementFormat.Vector3, VertexElementUsage.Normal, 0),
new VertexElement(24, VertexElementFormat.Vector2, VertexElementUsage.TextureCoordinate, 0),
new VertexElement(32, VertexElementFormat.Vector3, VertexElementUsage.Tangent, 0),
new VertexElement(44, VertexElementFormat.Vector3, VertexElementUsage.Binormal, 0)
);
VertexDeclaration IVertexType.VertexDeclaration { get { return VertexElements; } }
public static readonly int SizeInBytes = sizeof(float) * (3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 3);
}
Shader:
// XNA 4.0 Shader Programming #4 - Normal Mapping
// Matrix
float4x4 World;
float4x4 View;
float4x4 Projection;
// Light related
float4 AmbientColor;
float AmbientIntensity;
float3 LightDirection;
float4 DiffuseColor;
float DiffuseIntensity;
float4 SpecularColor;
float3 EyePosition;
texture2D ColorMap;
sampler2D ColorMapSampler = sampler_state
{
Texture = <ColorMap>;
MinFilter = linear;
MagFilter = linear;
MipFilter = linear;
};
texture2D NormalMap;
sampler2D NormalMapSampler = sampler_state
{
Texture = <NormalMap>;
MinFilter = linear;
MagFilter = linear;
MipFilter = linear;
};
// The input for the VertexShader
struct VertexShaderInput
{
float4 Position : POSITION0;
float2 TexCoord : TEXCOORD0;
float3 Normal : NORMAL0;
float3 Binormal : BINORMAL0;
float3 Tangent : TANGENT0;
};
// The output from the vertex shader, used for later processing
struct VertexShaderOutput
{
float4 Position : POSITION0;
float2 TexCoord : TEXCOORD0;
float3 View : TEXCOORD1;
float3x3 WorldToTangentSpace : TEXCOORD2;
};
// The VertexShader.
VertexShaderOutput VertexShaderFunction(VertexShaderInput input)
{
VertexShaderOutput output;
float4 worldPosition = mul(input.Position, World);
float4 viewPosition = mul(worldPosition, View);
output.Position = mul(viewPosition, Projection);
output.TexCoord = input.TexCoord;
output.WorldToTangentSpace[0] = mul(normalize(input.Tangent), World);
output.WorldToTangentSpace[1] = mul(normalize(input.Binormal), World);
output.WorldToTangentSpace[2] = mul(normalize(input.Normal), World);
output.View = normalize(float4(EyePosition,1.0) - worldPosition);
return output;
}
// The Pixel Shader
float4 PixelShaderFunction(VertexShaderOutput input) : COLOR0
{
float4 color = tex2D(ColorMapSampler, input.TexCoord);
float3 normalMap = 2.0 *(tex2D(NormalMapSampler, input.TexCoord)) - 1.0;
normalMap = normalize(mul(normalMap, input.WorldToTangentSpace));
float4 normal = float4(normalMap,1.0);
float4 diffuse = saturate(dot(-LightDirection,normal));
float4 reflect = normalize(2*diffuse*normal-float4(LightDirection,1.0));
float4 specular = pow(saturate(dot(reflect,input.View)),32);
return color * AmbientColor * AmbientIntensity +
color * DiffuseIntensity * DiffuseColor * diffuse +
color * SpecularColor * specular;
}
// Our Techinique
technique Technique1
{
pass Pass1
{
VertexShader = compile vs_2_0 VertexShaderFunction();
PixelShader = compile ps_2_0 PixelShaderFunction();
}
}
This Is Not Done In The Correct Order:
output.WorldToTangentSpace[0] = mul(normalize(input.Tangent), World);
output.WorldToTangentSpace[1] = mul(normalize(input.Binormal), World);
output.WorldToTangentSpace[2] = mul(normalize(input.Normal), World);
It Should Be Like This:
output.WorldToTangentSpace[0] = normalize(mul(input.Tangent, World));
output.WorldToTangentSpace[1] = normalize(mul(input.Binormal, World));
output.WorldToTangentSpace[2] = normalize(mul(input.Normal, World));
Otherwise, Your Normals Will Get Scaled From The World-space Transformation And Will Result In Very Bright And Very Dark Patches (Which Looks Like Your Problem). BTW, Seeing As You're Interested In Normal Mapping For Voxel Engines, Check Out The Following That I Had Made:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roMlOmNgr_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkfHoGzQ8ZY
Hope You Get Inspired And That You Complete Your Project.
I'm trying to implement a simple FPS camera, that I have brought over from an older XNA Project, in SlimDX.Direct3D11. I have no idea how to set the resulting view matrix, or any matrix for that matter.
All tutorials I have found use C++ and functions or classes that are not available in SlimDX. Do any of you know know more of more examples than the three on the SlimDX homepage?
This is my vertex shader
cbuffer MatrixBuffer
{
matrix worldMatrix;
matrix viewMatrix;
matrix projectionMatrix;
};
struct VertexInputType
{
float4 position : POSITION;
float2 tex : TEXCOORD0;
};
struct PixelInputType
{
float4 position : SV_POSITION;
float2 tex : TEXCOORD0;
};
PixelInputType TextureVertexShader(VertexInputType input)
{
PixelInputType output;
input.position.w = 1.0f;
output.position = mul(input.position, worldMatrix);
output.position = mul(output.position, viewMatrix);
output.position = mul(output.position, projectionMatrix);
output.tex = input.tex;
return output;
}
And loading them with
bytecode = ShaderBytecode.CompileFromFile("shader/triangle.fx", "TextureVertexShader", "vs_4_0", ShaderFlags.None, EffectFlags.None);
inputSignature = ShaderSignature.GetInputSignature(bytecode);
vertexShader = new VertexShader(device, bytecode);
How could I implement a bleach bypass shader effect for WPF?
I'm also interested in the possibility of implementing the first two Tehnicolor Film Processes, or any variety that would result in an old film look.
Check out: http://developer.download.nvidia.com/shaderlibrary/packages/post_bleach_bypass.fx.zip
The important part is:
float4 bypassPS(QuadVertexOutput IN, uniform sampler2D SceneSampler) : COLOR
{
float4 base = tex2D(SceneSampler, IN.UV);
float3 lumCoeff = float3(0.25,0.65,0.1);
float lum = dot(lumCoeff,base.rgb);
float3 blend = lum.rrr;
float L = min(1,max(0,10*(lum- 0.45)));
float3 result1 = 2.0f * base.rgb * blend;
float3 result2 = 1.0f - 2.0f*(1.0f-blend)*(1.0f-base.rgb);
float3 newColor = lerp(result1,result2,L);
float A2 = Opacity * base.a;
float3 mixRGB = A2 * newColor.rgb;
mixRGB += ((1.0f-A2) * base.rgb);
return float4(mixRGB,base.a);
}