I have a very basic Web API example that I constructed using the example code from this tutorial:
Code
Relevant Web.config Section
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_32bit" />
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit" />
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_32bit" path="*." verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" modules="IsapiModule" scriptProcessor="%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\aspnet_isapi.dll" preCondition="classicMode,runtimeVersionv4.0,bitness32" responseBufferLimit="0" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit" path="*." verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" modules="IsapiModule" scriptProcessor="%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\aspnet_isapi.dll" preCondition="classicMode,runtimeVersionv4.0,bitness64" responseBufferLimit="0" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
Route Configuration
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
}
View Model
public class Survey
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
ApiController
public class SurveysController : ApiController
{
public IEnumerable<Survey> All()
{
using (ITSurveyEntities model = new ITSurveyEntities())
{
return new List<Survey>(
from s in model.Surveys
select new Survey
{
Id = s.Id,
Name = s.Name,
Description = s.Description,
});
}
}
}
and it's leveraging ITSurveyEntities, which was a generated ADO.NET Entity Data Model from the database, which only contains a single table right now, Survey.
In short, I don't think I'm trying to do anything special here.
Current Result
When I try and navigate to the API using something like http://localhost:1681/api/surveys, I get a response, but the file is named surveys with no extension. Further, if I try and Save As and give it say a txt extension, the download just fails.
Expected Result
I would expect that the API would return a file names surveys.json, like the example project does with products, and the browser would ask me to open or save the file.
What I've Tried
Comparing Web.config Files
I have compared the Web.config files between my project and the example code from the tutorial that works.
Comparing Routing
I have compared the routing configuration between my project and the example code from the tutorial that works.
Excluding WebDav
I've tried to exclude WebDav because my searches have indicated that it might be the cause. I did that by modifying the Web.config in a manner that matches what's on this blog.
UPDATE 1
Okay, after the guidance by Joe Enos I found that the issue was that the view model was named Survey also and so it was throwing an error about ambiguity between the CLR type and the EDM type.
I resolved that by renaming the view model to SurveyViewModel, and the request to http://localhost:1681/api/surveys now returns a HTTP 200 and downloads the file as expected.
If you take a look at the raw request and response using Fiddler or your browser's dev tools, you should find some clues as to the problem.
The response type (xml, json, etc) will be dictated by the accepts header in your request. You didn't mention what browser you were using to call the service but I believe there is difference in the default accept header between browsers. If you only want to return only Json data from webapi try adding the following to the Global.Asax:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Clear();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Insert(0,new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());
Media Formatters are essentially how the data from the Webapi method are serialized for the browser.
Related
I am trying to setup a .net core 2.2 web api to use a post verb. Anything other than a get verb returns a 405 no matter if it is run on my local machine (w10 iis eXPRESS 10.0) or the windows server (2016 R2 IIS 8.0). I've read the other posts about disabling WebDav in your config file, adding a route, and completely removing the WebDav feature. I have done all of those to no avail. I'm just starting to develop in core and find this baffling, on the same server is a non-core web api that runs on .net framework 4.5 that processes GET,PUT,POST,DELETE without error. And yes, I have restarted the server after making changes to any of the configurations. The following are the web.config changes that I made, the last one coming directly from MS. Basic project that reproduces the same error on my machine and server is here https://github.com/FranciscanMedia/error405_core/tree/master it is just a standard web api project you get when you fire up VS2019.
<system.webServer>
<handlers accessPolicy="Read, Script">
<remove name="WebDAV" />
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit"
path="*."
verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS"
modules="IsapiModule"
scriptProcessor="%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\aspnet_isapi.dll"
preCondition="classicMode,runtimeVersionv4.0,bitness64"
responseBufferLimit="0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<remove name="WebDAVModule" />
</modules>
<handlers>
<remove name="WebDAV" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="false">
<remove name="WebDAVModule"/>
</modules>
</system.webServer>
<system.webServer>
<handlers accessPolicy="Read, Script">
<remove name="WebDAV" />
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-ISAPI-4.0_64bit"
path="*."
verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS"
modules="IsapiModule"
scriptProcessor="%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\aspnet_isapi.dll"
preCondition="classicMode,runtimeVersionv4.0,bitness64"
responseBufferLimit="0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
Short answer
It could be as simple as that. The reason is routing.
Just send your POST request to right URL like https://localhost:44327/api/values/123.
Detailed explanation
It's not the issue. It works as expected.
You make a GET request to https://localhost:44327/api/values/. It returns 200 OK.
But when you make a POST request to the same URL https://localhost:44327/api/values/. It says 405 Method not allowed.
However, you get 405. It is happening because you are hitting the GET endpoint with POST method.
Microsoft Docs says:
... the HTTP client sent a valid JSON request to the URL for a Web API application on a web server, but the server returned an HTTP 405 error message which indicates that the PUT method was not allowed for the URL. In contrast, if the request URI did not match a route for the Web API application, the server would return an HTTP 404 Not Found error.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/testing-and-debugging/troubleshooting-http-405-errors-after-publishing-web-api-applications
If you simply remove the GET endpoint. The POST request will start returning 404 Not found. Which means that you are not hitting any registered route.
To send POST request you need to use different URL according to the routing rules.
[Route("api/[controller]")]
[ApiController]
public class ValuesController : ControllerBase
{
// POST api/values
[HttpPost("{val}")]
public StatusCodeResult Post()
{
return Ok();
}
}
This attribute-based configuration means that route of your POST endpoint is /api/Values/{val}. Where {val} is any value. It's not processed in the endpoint.
If you want to process it, you should pass it to the method:
[HttpPost("{val}")]
public StatusCodeResult Post(string val)
{
return Ok();
}
I think that in your controller you have to import another library.
Try
using System.Web.Http;
Instead of
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc
Looking at what you have defined:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
[ApiController]
public class ValuesController : ControllerBase
Then for the action:
[HttpPost("{val}")]
public StatusCodeResult Post()
{
return Ok();
}
Your routing matches the following url:
https://localhost:44327/api/values/StatusCodeResult
It is going to take your main route defined on your controller [Route("api/[controller]")]
Then you are defining the "template" to use "{val}"
This is telling it to use the ActionResult specific name and to expect var val to be passed/appened.
Checking out the official documentation here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/controllers/routing?view=aspnetcore-2.2
under section "Token replacement in route templates ([controller], [action], [area])"
They specifiy:
For convenience, attribute routes support token replacement by enclosing a token in square-braces ([, ]). The tokens [action], [area], and [controller] are replaced with the values of the action name, area name, and controller name from the action where the route is defined. In the following example, the actions match URL paths as described in the comments:
[Route("[controller]/[action]")]
public class ProductsController : Controller
{
[HttpGet] // Matches '/Products/List'
public IActionResult List() {
// ...
}
[HttpGet("{id}")] // Matches '/Products/Edit/{id}'
public IActionResult Edit(int id) {
// ...
}
}
If you want it to just route based on just verbs (follow a pattern where each api endpoint just handles operations for that specific object) then you would change your post method to just
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Post(string val)
{
return Ok();
}
I totally agree with #Vladimir's answer. I dont have enough points to add comments to the answer by #vlaimir so i am adding my thoughts and suggestions.
The code you have on your github,
// POST api/values
[HttpPost("{val}")]
public StatusCodeResult Post()
{
return Ok();
}
This is a post and it would expect a value {val} per the route action configuration. Since you may try to hit the post without any value, thats not permitted. Ensure you supply some value and then do the POST. If you are using POSTMAN, you may have to supply the BODY of your request with some value. Swagger is a great util tool to embed into the web api's and that comes with excellent intuitive UI for our routes/resources. That might be even ideal to help determine and ensure you supply the right value.
Otherwise, you dont need to modify or worry about your IIS or IIS Express settings. or webdav.
I want to enable CORS on one specific action in an Asp.net Web Api. Here's how I'm trying to do it:
[Route("api/mycontroller/myaction")]
[HttpPost]
[EnableCors("https://example.com", "*", "post")]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> MyAction()
{
...
}
But when I send an OPTIONS request to the route, I get back an error: "The requested resource does not support http method 'OPTIONS'." I also tried removing the [HttpPost] annotation to no avail.
What am I missing?
For me, I added the following headers to the request by adding the following code to the Application_BeginRequest function of the Global.asax.cs file:
protected void Application_BeginRequest()
{
if (Request.Headers.AllKeys.Contains("Origin", StringComparer.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)
&& Request.HttpMethod == "OPTIONS")
{
Response.AddHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "content-type", "accept", "pragma", "cache-control", "authorization");
Response.End();
}
}
I have little idea why this works.
Out of curiosity, I tried adding all headers by using an asterisk but then Web API complained that the Authorization header was missing.
You've probably missed the higher level call to HttpConfiguration.EnableCors, as described here: https://enable-cors.org/server_aspnet.html.
Add this code to your configuration:
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// New code
config.EnableCors();
}
To ensure the OPTIONS request gets handled by your application code and not some other part of the system before it reaches your app code, you may try adding the following to your web.config:
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
You might also need to include:
<add name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" path="*" verb="OPTIONS"
modules="IsapiModule" requireAccess="None"
scriptProcessor="C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\asp.dll"
resourceType="Unspecified" />
See the answer at IIS hijacks CORS Preflight OPTIONS request.
Or maybe even just this:
<add name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" path="*" verb="OPTIONS"
modules="ProtocolSupportModule" requireAccess="None" />
If none of that on its own works, then in your global.asax or other code you might try:
if (filterContext.HttpContext.Request.HttpMethod == "OPTIONS")
{
filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Flush();
}
…or some other variation on that, for example:
if (Request.Headers.AllKeys.Contains("Origin", StringComparer.OridinalIgnoreCase)
&& Request.HttpMethod == "OPTIONS") {
Response.Flush();
}
Regardless of what specific code you use to do it, the point is to:
make sure OPTIONS requests are actually getting caught/handled by your application code—not caught/handled by some other part of the system before ever reaching your app code
make sure you have explicit handling for OPTIONS requests in your application code
make the OPTIONS handling in your application code just do Response.Flush()
Or another approach I’m not sure is relevant to your situation as coded but I’ll mention just in case:
public HttpResponseMessage Options()
{
var response = new HttpResponseMessage
{
StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK
};
return response;
}
I know this question has plenty of other questions that on the face of it may seem the same but I'm fairly sure my case is slightly different. I'm getting 404 errors on our production environment for an API call and I have tried all of the following:
<remove name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0"/>
<add name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" path="*" verb="*" type="System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule" preCondition=""/>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true">
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
Having looked at most of the potential solutions online, I found that most peoples error messages were this:
Where mine differs is the Handler part in the left column. Mine instead mentions the System.Web.Http.WebHost.HttpControllerHandler which suggests its hitting something relating to the API.
The URL I'm trying to hit is https://website.com/api/discounts/validate and my routes are configured as so:
public class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "ApiDefault",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional });
}
}
And Register is called from my Global.asax.cs at the very end of the Application_Start method. Again, this all works in our development and QA environments.
When I debug/run, using IIS Express, and browse to http://localhost:1234/People, IIS Express tries to browse the People directory instead of executing the People route, and I get a 403.14 HTTP error. So I disabled the StaticFile handler in the Web.config and refreshed. Now I get a 404.4 HTTP error:
I know that the route works because if I rename the RoutePrefix, e.g. PeopleTest, then the route is executed and I get the response I expect.
How can I convince IIS/Express to prefer MVC routes over static files/directories?
I am using attribute routing; the relevant code is below:
Web.config
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<remove name="FormsAuthentication" />
</modules>
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler" />
<remove name="StaticFile"/>
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
Global.asax
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
FilterConfig.RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
BundleConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles);
AutofacConfig.Configure();
Startup\WebApiConfig
namespace MyApi.Startup {
public static class WebApiConfig {
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config) {
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
}
}
}
People\PeopleController
namespace MyApi.People {
[RoutePrefix("People")]
public partial class PagesController : BaseController {
[Route]
[HttpGet]
[ResponseType(typeof(IEnumerable<Person>))]
public IHttpActionResult Get() { ... }
}
}
Note that since I'm using attribute routing, I am using a non-standard folder structure. E.g. I don't have the Controllers/Models/Views folders, instead I have root folders for each business area (e.g. ~\People contains the controllers/models/etc. for the "People" business area).
What I've Tried
Setting RAMMFAR.
Removing and re-adding ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0.
Fixed by adding setting RouteExistingFiles = true:
public class RouteConfig
{
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.RouteExistingFiles = true;
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
}
}
So that ASP.NET routing will handle all routes: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.routing.routecollection.routeexistingfiles(v=vs.110).aspx
The URL I'm trying to let work is one in the style of: http://somedomain.com/api/people/staff.33311 (just like sites as LAST.FM allow all sort of signs in their RESTFul & WebPage urls, for example "http://www.last.fm/artist/psy'aviah" is a valid url for LAST.FM).
What works are following scenarios:
- http://somedomain.com/api/people/ - which returns all people
- http://somedomain.com/api/people/staff33311 - would work as well, but it's not what I'm after
I'd want the url to accept a "dot", like the example below
- http://somedomain.com/api/people/staff.33311 - but this gives me a
HTTP Error 404.0 - Not Found
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
I've set up following things:
The controller "PeopleController"
public IEnumerable<Person> GetAllPeople()
{
return _people;
}
public IHttpActionResult GetPerson(string id)
{
var person = _people.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Id.ToLower().Equals(id.ToLower()));
if (person == null)
return NotFound();
return Ok(person);
}
The WebApiConfig.cs
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// Web API configuration and services
// Web API routes
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
I already tried following all the tips of this blogpost http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ExperimentsInWackinessAllowingPercentsAnglebracketsAndOtherNaughtyThingsInTheASPNETIISRequestURL.aspx but it still won't work.. I also think it's quite tedious and I wonder if there isn't another, better and more secure way.
We have our Id's internally like this, so we're going to have to find a solution to fit the dot in one way or another, preferably in the style of "." but I'm open to alternative suggestions for urls if need be...
Suffix the URL with a slash e.g. http://somedomain.com/api/people/staff.33311/ instead of http://somedomain.com/api/people/staff.33311.
Following setting in your web.config file should fix your issue:
<configuration>
<system.webServer>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" />
I've found that adding the following before the standard ExtensionlessUrlHandler solves the issue for me:
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0-ForApi"
path="api/*"
verb="*"
type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler"
preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
I don't think the name actually matters all that much except it probably helps if your IDE (Visual Studio in my case) is managing your site configuration.
H/T to https://stackoverflow.com/a/15802305/264628
I don't know what I am doing really, but after playing with the previous answer a bit I came up with another, perhaps more appropriate, solution:
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<remove name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" />
<add name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" type="System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule" />
</modules>
</system.webServer>
I found that I needed to do more than just set the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests attribute to true. I also had to ensure that the extensionless URL handler was configured to look at all paths. In addition, there is one more bonus configuration setting you can add which will help in some cases. Here is my working Web.config:
<system.web>
<httpRuntime relaxedUrlToFileSystemMapping="true" />
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" />
<handlers>
<remove name="WebDAV" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*" verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
Note, specifically, that the ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0 has its path attribute set to * as opposed to *. (for instance).
I'd use this in Web.config file:
<add name="ManagedSpecialNames" path="api/people/*" verb="GET" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
before standard "ExtensionlessUrlHandler".
For instance in my case I put it here:
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler" />
<add name="ManagedFiles" path="api/people/*" verb="GET" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
So you force URLs of such pattern to be managed by you, instead of standard management as files in application directory tree.
I got stuck in this situation but appending /
at the end of URL wasn't look clean for me.
so just add below in web.config handlers tag
and you will be good to go.
<add name="Nancy" path="api" verb="*" type="Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet.NancyHttpRequestHandler" allowPathInfo="true" />
I found that both way works for me: either setting runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests to true or add ExtentionlessUrlHandler as following. Finally i choose to add extensionUrLHandler since runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests do have performance impact to the site.
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler" />
<remove name="WebDAV" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*" verb="*"
type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler"
preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
I also faced this issue. I was under a circumstance where I was not supposed to play with IIS and website config related settings. So I had to make it working by making changes at the code level only.
The point is that the most common case where you would end up having dot character in the URL is when you get some input from the user and pass it as a query string or url fragment to pass some argument to the parameters in the action method of your controller.
public class GetuserdetailsbyuseridController : ApiController
{
string getuserdetailsbyuserid(string userId)
{
//some code to get user details
}
}
Have a look at below URL where user enters his user id to get his personal details:
http://mywebsite:8080/getuserdetailsbyuserid/foo.bar
Since you have to fetch some data from the server we use http GET verb. While using GET calls any input parameters can be passed only in the URL fragments.
So to solve my problem I changed the http verb of my action to POST. Http POST verb has the facility of passing any user or non-user input in body also. So I created a JSON data and passed it into the body of the http POST request:
{
"userid" : "foo.bar"
}
Change your method definition as below:
public class GetuserdetailsbyuseridController : ApiController
{
[Post]
string getuserdetailsbyuserid([FromBody] string userId)
{
//some code to get user details
}
}
Note: More on when to use GET verb and when to use POST verb here.