I want to write this simple query with Linq:
select issuercode,securitycode,dataprocessingflag,COUNT(issuercode) as cnt
from cmr_invhdr
where ProcessedLike <> 'STMNT ONLY'
group by issuercode,securitycode,dataprocessingflag
order by Issuercode
I've tried the following code but I get this error( DbExpressionBinding requires an input expression with a collection ResultType.
Parameter name: input) :
var lstCMRInvHdrNips = (from r in e.CMR_INVHDR
where r.ProcessedLike != "STMNT ONLY"
select new {
r.IssuerCode,
r.SecurityCode,
CountofIssuerCode = r.IssuerCode.Count(),
r.DataProcessingFlag
}
).GroupBy(x =>
new {
x.IssuerCode,
x.SecurityCode,
x.DataProcessingFlag,
x.CountofIssuerCode
}
).OrderBy(x => x.Key.IssuerCode).ToList();
Is there any sense to count issuercode while grouping by this field at once? As when groupped by a field, it's COUNT will always be 1.
Probably you should not group by issuercode and count it after the GroupBy in a separate Select statement:
var result = e.CMR_INVHDR
.Where(r => r.ProcessedLike != "STMNT ONLY")
.GroupBy(r => new { r.SecurityCode, r.DataProcessingFlag })
.Select(r => new
{
Value = r.Key,
IssuerCodesCount = r.GroupBy(g => g.IssuerCode).Count()
})
.ToList();
Related
I want to group by a table with Order Id but if one of price is negative don’t group by and brings all rows in output
I use below code but group by all order id
tblResult = tblResult.AsEnumerable().GroupBy(r => new { orderId = r["OrderID"] }).Select(g =>
{
var row = tblResult.NewRow();
row["Order ID"] = g.Key.orderId;
row["Price"] = g.Sum(r => float.Parse(r.Field<string>("Price"))).ToString();
return row;
}).CopyToDataTable();
You can create your condition in grouping, the tricky part is the result would be a list for those with negative prices and single item for those without it. if we also make single items as list then SelectMany() shoud do what you want:
var result = list.GroupBy(x => x.Id)
.SelectMany(g => g.Any(x => x.Price < 0)?
g.ToList():
new List<Order> { new Order { Id = g.Key, Price = g.Sum(grp => grp.Price)}});
LIVE DEMO
Using the following linq code, how can I add dense_rank to my results? If that's too slow or complicated, how about just the rank window function?
var x = tableQueryable
.Where(where condition)
.GroupBy(cust=> new { fieldOne = cust.fieldOne ?? string.Empty, fieldTwo = cust.fieldTwo ?? string.Empty})
.Where(g=>g.Count()>1)
.ToList()
.SelectMany(g => g.Select(cust => new {
cust.fieldOne
, cust.fieldTwo
, cust.fieldThree
}));
This does a dense_rank(). Change the GroupBy and the Order according to your need :)
Basically, dense_rank is numbering the ordered groups of a query so:
var DenseRanked = data.Where(item => item.Field2 == 1)
//Grouping the data by the wanted key
.GroupBy(item => new { item.Field1, item.Field3, item.Field4 })
.Where(#group => #group.Any())
// Now that I have the groups I decide how to arrange the order of the groups
.OrderBy(#group => #group.Key.Field1 ?? string.Empty)
.ThenBy(#group => #group.Key.Field3 ?? string.Empty)
.ThenBy(#group => #group.Key.Field4 ?? string.Empty)
// Because linq to entities does not support the following select overloads I'll cast it to an IEnumerable - notice that any data that i don't want was already filtered out before
.AsEnumerable()
// Using this overload of the select I have an index input parameter. Because my scope of work is the groups then it is the ranking of the group. The index starts from 0 so I do the ++ first.
.Select((#group , i) => new
{
Items = #group,
Rank = ++i
})
// I'm seeking the individual items and not the groups so I use select many to retrieve them. This overload gives me both the item and the groups - so I can get the Rank field created above
.SelectMany(v => v.Items, (s, i) => new
{
Item = i,
DenseRank = s.Rank
}).ToList();
Another way is as specified by Manoj's answer in this question - But I prefer it less because of the selecting twice from the table.
So if I understand this correctly, the dense rank is the index of the group it would be when the groups are ordered.
var query = db.SomeTable
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Your, x.Key })
.OrderBy(g => g.Key.Your).ThenBy(g => g.Key.Key)
.AsEnumerable()
.Select((g, i) => new { g, i })
.SelectMany(x =>
x.g.Select(y => new
{
y.Your,
y.Columns,
y.And,
y.Key,
DenseRank = x.i,
}
);
var denseRanks = myDb.tblTestReaderCourseGrades
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Grade })
.OrderByDescending(g => g.Key.Grade)
.AsEnumerable()
.Select((g, i) => new { g, i })
.SelectMany(x =>
x.g.Select(y => new
{
y.Serial,
Rank = x.i + 1,
}
));
I have the following:
var ts = _q.GetAll()
.Where(m => m.a == 1)
.Select(m => new MyClass
{
Id = ???,
QId = m.q
})
.ToList();
How can I make this so that the Id field in MyClass gets an index
value starting with 1 and incrementing for each new MyClass Created?
Note that I did try to specify .Select(m, index => etc but this
gives me an error.
You can use the overload of Select that gives you the index:
var ts = _q.GetAll()
.Where(m => m.a == 1)
.Select((m, index) => new MyClass
{
Id = index + 1,
QId = m.q
})
.ToList();
I did try to specify .Select(m, index => etc but this gives me an error
Yes, because of the missing paranthesis.
var query = from i in SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
orderby i.Poprctnm descending
select new { RR = i.Poprctnm };
Result:
RR-01,
RR-01,
RR-02,
RR-02,
RR-02,
RR-TEST,
RR-TEST,
How do i group RR in this kind of statement
Result:
RR-01,
RR-02,
RR-TEST
just a few modification to ask if is it possible to do this one or what you have in your mind? Sorry for asking too much just really interested in learning more on linq.. how do i convert it into string coz its showing true or false.. boolean statement
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s =>
s.Poprctnm.StartsWith(p))
.Distinct()
.OrderBy(p => p)
.Select(p => new { RR = p })
.Take(10);
You can use Distinct or GroupBy methods in this case
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s=> s.Poprctnm)
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(p => p)
.Select(p=> new { RR = p });
if you use OrderByDescending then the result will be
RR-TEST
RR-02
RR-01
But I think you want OrderBy then the result will be
RR-01
RR-02
RR-TEST
So try below
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s=> s.Poprctnm)
.Distinct()
.OrderBy(p => p)
.Select(p=> new { RR = p });
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.GroupBy(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.Select(g=>g.First())
.OrderByDescending(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.Select(x=>new { RR = x.Poprctnm });
If you want to get result as group:
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.GroupBy(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.OrderByDescending(g=>g.Key);
var result = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.Select(x => new { RR = x.Poprctnm })
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Poprctnm);
Looks like you need Distinct here, not group
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.Select(x => new {RR = i.Poprctnm})
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(i => i);
How to use extension methods to form the second query as the first one.
1) var query = from cm in cust
group cm by cm.Customer into cmr
select (new { CKey = cmr.Key, Count = cmr.Count() });
(second query is not well formed)
2) var qry = cust.GroupBy(p => p.Customer).
Select(new { CKey = p.Key, Count = p.Count });
Try this:
var query = cust.GroupBy(p => p.Customer)
.Select(g => new { CKey = g.Key, Count = g.Count() });
You can also simplify this into a single call to this GroupBy overload though:
var query = cust.GroupBy(p => p.Customer,
(key, g) => new { CKey = key, Count = g.Count() });
Note that I've changed the name of the lambda expression's parameter name for the second line to g - I believe that gives more of a clue that you're really looking at a group rather than a single entity.
I've also moved the dot onto the second line in the form that still uses Select - I find this makes the query easier to read; I usually line up the dots, e.g.
var query = foo.Where(...)
.OrderBy(...)
.GroupBy(...)
.Select(...)
I think you need:
var qry = cust.GroupBy(p => p.Customer)
.Select(grp => new { CKey = grp.Key, Count = grp.Count() });