ViewModel loses data on post - c#

I'm trying to create a complex ViewModel that has both an Index Page and Create Page of Company Notes all within the Details Page of a Company, and would like some guidance as to whether I'm doing this properly.
My problem at the moment is that when I create a new Company Note, it doesn't have any information in the object beyond the EditorFor fields I include in my cshtml - it loses all the data in the ViewModel.
I have a Company model and CompanyController, and in my Details action, I populate all the notes that are relevant to the company, and a form to allow users to add a new note.
My Company and CompanyNotes model are very simple:
public class Company
{
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
// bunch of fields related to the company
public virtual ICollection<CompanyNote> CompanyNotes { get; set; }
}
public class CompanyNote
{
public int CompanyNoteID { get; set; }
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
public string Note { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
I have a ViewModel that looks like this:
public class CompanyViewModel
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
// List of all notes associated with this company
public IEnumerable<CompanyNote> CompanyNotes { get; set; }
// A CompanyNote object to allow me to create a new note:
public CompanyNote CompanyNote { get; set; }
}
This is my Details action, which populates the company record, gets a list of related notes, and displays a create form with a new, empty object:
public ActionResult Details(int id = 0)
{
var viewModel = new CompanyViewModel();
viewModel.Company = db.Companies.Find(id);
if (viewModel.Company == null)
{
return HttpNotFound();
}
viewModel.CompanyNotes = (from a in db.CompanyNotes
where a.Company.CompanyID.Equals(id)
select a).OrderBy(x => x.Date);
viewModel.CompanyNote = new CompanyNote
{
Date = System.DateTime.Now,
Company = viewModel.Company
};
return View(viewModel);
}
This is my CreateNote action in my CompanyController. (Should I split this out into a separate partial view? What would be the benefit?)
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult CreateNote(CompanyViewModel companyViewModel)
{
CompanyNote companyNote = companyViewModel.CompanyNote;
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
db.CompanyNotes.Add(companyNote);
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
return View(companyViewModel);
}
Finally, here's a simplified version of detail.cshtml:
#model Project.ViewModels.CompanyViewModel
// My company detail display is here, removed for sake of berevity
#using (Html.BeginForm("CreateNote", "Company"))
{
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.CompanyNote.Date)
#Html.TextAreaFor(model => model.CompanyNote.Note})
<input type="submit" value="Create" />
}
When I post, my CreateNote action has a companyViewModel that is basically empty, with the exception of companyViewModel.CompanyNote.Date and companyViewModel.CompanyNote.Note, which are the fields in my form - all the other data in the ViewModel is null, so I'm not sure how to even include a reference back to the parent company.
Am I even on the right path here?
Thanks,
Robbie

When I post, my CreateNote action has a companyViewModel that is
basically empty, with the exception of
companyViewModel.CompanyNote.Date and
companyViewModel.CompanyNote.Note, which are the fields in my form -
all the other data in the ViewModel is null, so I'm not sure how to
even include a reference back to the parent company.
That's perfectly normal behavior. Only information that is included in your form as input fields is sent to the server when you submit the form and this is the only information you could ever hope the model binder be able to retrieve.
If you need the CompanyNotes collection in your HttpPost action simply query your backend, the same way you did in your GET action. You could do this by passing the company ID as a hidden field:
#Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Company.CompanyID)
So the idea is to only include as input fields in your form information that the user is supposed to somehow modify. For all the other information, well, you've already have it in your backend so all you have to do is hit it to get it.
Contrary to classic WebForms, there's no longer any notion of ViewState in ASP.NET MVC. It is much closer to the stateless nature of the HTTP protocol.

Related

MVC Pass display data between views

I have a view model that is used to display a form on one view, and then is also used to represent the POST data to an action. The action then displays another view model that contains much of the same data from the first view model. However, the first view model has several "display only" properties that are also required on the second view model (for display only on the second view also).
I am wondering what the best way to pass this "display only" data to the second view would be. Currently, the best solution I have come up with is to have a bunch of hidden form fields that contain the display only property values, and then the model gets auto-populated for the action that handles the form POST. However, using hidden form fields seems very "hackish", and there seems like there should be a better solution to passing this data to another view The action doesn't need the display only information, it is only accessing it to populate the properties of the second view model that is passed to the second view.
Let me just explain my question with code, as what I am after is probably better understood through code than words.
Models:
public class SearchFilters
{
// ...
}
public class SearchResult
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public bool Selected { get; set; }
public string SomeDisplayValue1 { get; set; }
public string SomeDisplayValue2 { get; set; }
// ...
}
public class ResultsViewModel
{
public IList<SearchResult> Results { get; set; }
// ...
}
public class DoSomethingWithSelectedResultsViewModel
{
public IList<SearchResult> SelectedResults { get; set; }
public string SomeOtherProperty { get; set; }
// ...
}
Controller:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Results(SearchFilters filters)
{
ResultsViewModel results = new ResultsViewModel();
// ...
return new View(results);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult DoSomethingWithSelectedResults(ResultsViewModel model)
{
// ...
return View(new DoSomethingWithSelectedResultsViewModel
{
SelectedResults = model.Results.Where(r => r.Selected).ToList(),
SomeOtherProperty = "...",
// ...
});
}
View: Results.cshtml
#model ResultsViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm("DoSomethingWithSelectedResults", "Search"))
{
<table>
for (int i = 0; i < Model.Results.Count; i++)
{
<tr>
<td>
#Html.CheckBoxFor(m => Model.Results[i].Selected)
#* I would like to eliminate these hidden inputs *#
#Html.HiddenFor(m => Model.Results[i].Id)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => Model.Results[i].SomeDisplayValue1)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => Model.Results[i].SomeDisplayValue2)
</td>
<td>#Html.DisplayFor(m => Model.Results[i].SomeDisplayValue1)</td>
<td>#Html.DisplayFor(m => Model.Results[i].SomeDisplayValue2)</td>
<tr>
}
</table>
<button type="submit">Do Something With Selected Results</button>
}
As far as I know, one of the best way to pass data from View to another View through a Controller is to use ViewBag, ViewData or TempData. As an example, you can pass the data retrieved from View I as shown below:
TempData[DataToBePassed] = model.CustomData;
And then retrieve this data in View II similar to that:
#if(TempData[DataToBePassed] != null)
{
var dataFromFirstView = TempData[DataToBePassed];
}
For more information take a look at When to use ViewBag, ViewData, or TempData in ASP.NET MVC 3 applications.
You could put the model in the TempData property of the controller, that way it's automatically available in the next request.
More here
Found what I was looking for, I just hadn't worked with MVC enough yet to know about it. The Controller.UpdateModel method does exactly what I was looking for.
Example (using the code from the question):
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult DoSomethingWithSelectedResults()
{
// Load initial model data here, in this case I had simply cached the results in
// temp data in the previous action as suggested by Emeka Awagu.
ResultsViewModel model = (ResultsViewModel)TempData["results"];
// Call UpdateModel and let it do it's magic.
UpdateModel(model);
// ...
return View(new DoSomethingWithSelectedResultsViewModel
{
SelectedResults = model.Results.Where(r => r.Selected).ToList(),
SomeOtherProperty = "...",
// ...
});
}
Using this method I was able to eliminate all the hidden form fields and did not have to write any custom copy logic, since UpdateModel deals with it automatically.
Note: I did have to implement some custom model binders to get things to work correctly with dictionaries and collections (see here, here, and here).

Model dropping List<>s after DropDownList

I'm working on a search criteria building page. In addition to several string and numerical type fields, there are several "multiple choice" options.
I'm using the [Get] signature without parameters(pass the CriteriaModel to the view) >> [Post] signature with CriteriaModel parameter (redirect to searching controller)
I've built lightweight option classes (just value, name pairs) and am populating several List<> with the primitive options.
Using Html.DropDownListFor, I'm able to get them to display.
...but...
When I enter the [Post] version, the List<>s are all set to null and empty. Further, the other criteria fields supposed to be populated afterwards are also default and empty.
Technically, I don't need a whole list of values back - if I could even just have the index of the selected value - but I'm up against a wall here.
Pertinent model data:
public class CriteriaModel
{
[DisplayName("Owner Name")]
public string OwnerName { get; set; }
[DisplayName("Subdivision")]
public List<Subdivision> Subdivision { get; set; }
[DisplayName("PIN")]
public string PIN { get; set; }
}
public class Subdivision
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Pertinent controller code:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Index()
{
CriteriaModel criteria = new CriteriaModel();
...fill in the Subdivisions...
View(criteria);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(CriteriaModel search_criteria)
{
return View("Search obtained" + search_criteria.Subdivision.First().Name);
}
And pertinent View markup:
#model REOModern.Models.CriteriaModel
...bunch of HTML...
#Html.LabelFor(model => model.Subdivision)
#Html.DropDownListFor(x => x.Subdivision, new SelectList(Model.Subdivision, "ID", "Name", Model.Subdivision.First().ID))
...other HTML...
<button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary" value="Index">Search</button>
I should clarify: I know that my 'return View("Search obtained" + ...' will fail, but it should show the piece of data that I need. The problem is it's a null reference exception. Until I can fix that, there's no point in building a user-friendly View for submitted search criteria.
MVC does not repopulate the List<> elements.
You would split the selected value out into another property of the model.
So in your model, include something like this
public int SelectedValue { get; set; }
Then for your Html.DropDownListFor helper you would use
Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.SelectedValue, Model.DropDownList, new { /* htmlAttributes */ });
Of course they're empty. The only data that exists in your post action is that which was posted via the form. Since the entire dropdown list, itself, was not posted, merely a selected item(s), the lists are empty. For anything like this, you need to rerun the same logic in your post action to populate them as you did in your get action. It's usually better to factor out this logic into a private method on your controller that both actions can use:
private void PopulateSomeDropDownList(SomeModel model)
{
// logic here to construct dropdown list
model.SomeDropDownList = dropdownlist;
}
Then in your actions:
PopulateSomeDropDownList(model);
return View(model);

Use Lambda or Linq to create Model of SelectList with Selected item for razor View in MVC5

I'm using EF code first and MVC5 C# for my web application. I've created a db table that contains master definitions for a couple dozen settings that are used to specify input and output parameters throughout the application.
I've also created a table that keys on user ID. Each user that gets created is given default settings that can be changed at any time using a User Preferences (razor) View page.
Now I am trying to code the controller actions for this View page. Most all of these user preferences will require selection from a dropdown list, but this is where it's confusing for me.
// UOM Master Table
public class UOMMaster
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string MeasureId { get; set; } // Text used as labels
public double SortOrder { get; set; } // User preferences sort order
public string UOMId { get; set; } // UOM abbreviation
public bool IsUserPreference { get; set; } // true if is a stored user preference
}
The master table data above may look like:
1, "AbsolutePress", 1, "psi", true
2, "AbsolutePress", 1, "kPaa", true
3, "FluidFlow", 2, "GPM", true
4, "FluidFlow", 2, "m^3/Hr", true
5, "FluidFlow", 2, "l/s", true
etc, etc...
The custom Identity with an ICollection containing :
public class ApplicationUser : IdentityUser
{
// Default Units of Measure
public virtual ICollection<AspNetUserUOMDefault> UOMDefaults { get; set; }
}
The preferred user defaults are stored in a table keyed on Identity's UserId:
public class AspNetUserUOMDefault
{
[Key]
public virtual ApplicationUser UserProfile { get; set; }
public int Id { get; set; }
public string MeasureId { get; set; }
public string PreferredUomId { get; set; }
}
Using the tables above, I need to create a razor View that displays dropdown lists to display the user's preferred setting:
+--------------+---+
AbsolutePress: | psi | V | <-- Dropdown list containing
+--------------+---+ all options available for
| psi | AbsolutePress as defined in
| kPaa | master table, with user's
+------------------+ preferred setting selected.
FluidFlow: +--------------+---+
| m^3/Hr | V | <-- Dropdown list containing
+--------------+---+ all options available for
| GPM | FluidFlow as defined in
| m^3/Hr | master table, with user's
| l/s | preferred setting selected.
+------------------+
etc, etc...
The GET Controller Action confuses me. I just don't have an idea on how to form the Model returned to the razor View, but it needs to be ordered by SortOrder (ascending) and contain an IList/ICollection of SelectList (perhaps??) containing the following (I'm not sure how to do this):
UOMPreferences
MeasureId
optionsList
UomId
UomId (Selected)
UomId
UOMPreferences
MeasureId
optionsList
UomId (Selected)
UomId
etc, etc..
The View template needs to display the contents of the Model using dropdown lists in SortOrder order. I envision this being dynamic so that a preference could be added to the database table without any changes required to either the Controller Actions or razor View template.
In the View there would be a foreach (I'm not sure how to do this):
#foreach (var preference in Model.UOMPreferences)
{
<div class="form-group">
#Html.LabelFor(preference.MeasureId, new { #class = "col-md-3 control-label" })
<div class="col-md-4">
#Html.DropDownListFor(
preference.MeasureId,
new SelectList(preference.optionsList, "Value", "Text"),
new { #class = "form-control" })
</div>
</div>
}
Does anyone have the experience and time to provide me with code snippet suggestions on how I can accomplish this? Probably my biggest confusion is in the Controller Actions themselves (GET and POST). I don't really care if the Model is created with Lambda or Linq, but I just can't envision how this can be done - and I'm sure it can be. My database models can likely be improved, though I think they will work?
Based on you additional comments, I suggest a different structure.
Firstly, the database tables
AbsolutePressOptions: ID(PK), Name, IsDefault(bit)
FluidFlowOptions: ID(PK), Name(varchar), IsDefault(bit)
//more tables for other options types
UserOptions: UserID(PK), AbsolutePressPreference(FK), FluidFlowPreference(FK), etc
Since the values for each option type are unlikely to change you could also consider using enums rather than creating database tables, for example
public enum AbsolutePressOption
{
psi,
kpa
}
User options class (based on using enums)
public class UserOptions
{
public UserOptions()
{
// Set defaults
AbsolutePressPreference = AbsolutePressOption.psi;
}
public AbsolutePressOption AbsolutePressPreference { get; set; }
public FluidFlowOption FluidFlowPreference { get; set; }
}
User
public class User
{
public User()
{
// Assign default options when user initialised
Options = new UserOptions();
}
.... // properties of user (ID, Name etc.)
public UserOptions Options { get; set; }
}
If a user adopts the defaults, there is no need to save anything to the database. To change their options your controller might be something like
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult UserOptions(int ID)
{
User user = UserRepository.Get(ID); // get user and user options from database
ViewBag.AbsolutePressOptions = new SelectList(....
return View(user);
}
Note, to create a SelectList from an enum for MVC-4 see here. Also it would be better to create a ViewModel that includes properties for the SelectLists.
The view
#model YourAssembly.User
// Some display properties of the user (Name etc.)
....
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.ID) // so the user ID posts back
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.Options.AbsolutePressPreference)
#Html.DropDownFor(m => m.Options.AbsolutePressPreference, (SelectList)ViewBag.AbsolutePressOptions)
// More selects for other options
<input type="submit" value="Save Options" />
}
And the post method
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult UserOptions(User user)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
// Build select lists again
return View(user)
}
UserRepository.SaveOptions(user) // Save options to database
// Redirect to the user details page?
return RedirectToAction("Details", new { ID = user.ID })
}
Finally, if a users preferences are used on most pages, I would consider creating a CustomPrincipal that writes the users preferences to the FormsAuthenticationTicket cookie so its avaliable in each request.
Should be something like this in your view
#foreach (string preference in Model.UOMPreferences.OrderBy(p=>p.SortOrder)
.Select(p=>p.MeasureId )
.Distinct())
{
var preferences = Model.UOMPreferences.Where(p=>p.MeasureId = preference);
....
#Html.DropDown(preference, new SelectList(preferences, "Id", "UOMId"))
....
}

Is my view model too "complex" to allow binding on post?

Using my model displaying a page works fine but the post does not return the bound model.
My classes:
public class ContactManager
{
public Contact Contact { get; set; }
public SelectList SalutationList { get; set; }
}
public class Contact
{
public int Id{get;set;}
public string FirstName{get; set;}
public SalutationType SalutationType{get; set;}
}
public class SalutationType
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
My View:
#model ViewModels.ContactManager
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.AntiForgeryToken()
#Html.ValidationSummary(true)
#Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Contact.Id)
#Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.Contact.SalutationType.Id, Model.SalutationList)
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.Contact.FirstName)
<input type="submit" value="Save" />
}
The issue seems to be in the DropDownListFor. The dropdown list displays correctly with the proper value but when I post this page the complete model is blank. If I simplify the DropDownListFor like this the values are posted as expected.
#html.DroDownListFor(model=>model.MyPlaceHolderProp, Model.SalutationList)
Is my model too complex? Am I not doing something correctly?
The models are based off of several tables using EF that I have created in a separate project. I am trying to avoid creating more classes/models then I have to.
You should post your controller action as well, as your model coming back as blank really has nothing to do with this. Changing the DropDownListFor definition one way or another should not effect the posting of any other values.
That said, you will run into another issue eventually here, so you need to regroup, anyways. You can't just post back the id value of a related item. Entity Framework will either complain that there's already an object with that id, or worse, if the object attaches, it will update the row with that id with the new posted value for Name, which in this case, is nothing, so it'll just clear it out.
When you create a relationship with a single item (a foreign key basically), if you don't specify a property to hold that foreign key value, Entity Framework creates one for you behind the scenes to track the relationship. In your case here, that means your Contacts table has a column named SalutationType_Id. However, there's no way from your class to directly access this value. This is why I recommend that you always provide an explicit property to handle the relationship:
[ForeignKey("SalutationType")]
public int SalutationTypeId { get; set; }
public SalutationType SalutationType { get; set; }
If you do that, then you can directly stuff the posted id there and Entity Framework will create the relationship.
#Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.Contact.SalutationTypeId, Model.SalutationList);
If you insist on keeping the key implicit, then you must create the relationship yourself, by creating a field on your view model to hold the posted value, then using that value to look up the SalutationType instance from the database, and then finally adding that to the Contact instance.
Add to your view model
public int SalutationTypeId { get; set; }
In your view
#Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.SalutationTypeId, Model.SalutationList)
In your POST action
var salutationType = db.SalutationTypes.Find(model.SalutationTypeId);
contact.SalutationType = salutationType;
You could do it this way. This may be the more "MVC best practice" way to handle it. Everything stays neatly in their models, and no manual IDs are required. The views are intended to be representations of the underlying models they are built on. If you are creating a view that has a form, then create a model that represents the form and use it in the view.
Revise your models like:
public class PostModel
{
public int ContactID { get; set; }
public int SalutationID { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
}
public class PostView
{
public ContactManager contact { get; set; }
public PostModel post { get; set; }
}
Then create the PostView in the controller:
public ActionResult Index()
{
//create the PostView model
var pv = new PostView();
pv.ContactManager = contactManager;
pv.post = new PostView()
{
ContactID = contactManager.Contact.Id,
SalutationID = contactManager.SalutationType.Id,
FirstName = contactManager.Contact.FirstName
};
return View(pv);
}
Then the view could be like:
#model ViewModels.PostView
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.AntiForgeryToken()
#Html.ValidationSummary(true)
#Html.HiddenFor(model => model.post.ContactID)
#Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.post.SalutationID, model.contact.SalutationList)
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.post.FirstName)
<input type="submit" value="Save" />
}
Then the post action in the controller:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(PostView pv)
{
//post code
//the posted data will be in pv.post
}
Have you considered using a custom model binder? Custom model binding isn't all that complicated for models that are still relatively simple, and you can handle the serialization/deserialization however you need to.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/hh781022.aspx
http://ivonna.biz/blog/2012/2/2/custom-aspnet-model-binders-series,-part-3-subclassing-your-models.aspx
http://forums.asp.net/t/1944696.aspx?what+is+custom+model+binding+in+mvc
I am not sure this will help you... I wsa having a similar issue but I was using ajax to post back... anyway, I had forgotten to mark my binding class with the [Serializable] attribute.
so you might try
[Serializable]
public class Contract {
...
}
Again, I am using Json to post back to my controller so may not be related or help you. But, I guess could be worth a try.

null on HTTPPost on ASP.NET

My Problem is like this ,Im trying to get a model object from a view after seinding it with a form,the model Looks like this:
public class PackageModel
{
public PackageDTO Package { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Allcategories { get; set; }
}
while PackageDTO is just an DTO object conatining many attributes.
Now the view for this model,ist just showing the attributes and this model will be sent within a httppost request to the index page as normal(there it will be processed ans saved ),
the index method in the Controller Looks like this:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(PackagemODEL packageModel, FormCollection form)
{
}
Now i dont know what im doing wrong,but the Object packageModel is not totally null,just the list Allcategories and another string Attribute in the PackageDTO object,the rest seems to be working.
The view contains this code
<fieldset>
<legend>#Resources.AppvManagementService_EditPackage_Title</legend>
#using (Html.BeginForm("Index","WantedController",FormMethod.Post,new {enctype="multipart/form-data"}))
{
#Html.ValidationSummary()
<labelName </label>#Html.TextBoxFor(model=>model.Package.Name) <br/>
<label>Sid </label>#Html.TextBoxFor(model=>model.Package.Sid,new {#disabled="disabled"}) <br/>
<label>Category </label>#Html.DropDownList("CategoryName",Model.Allcategories,Model.Package.Category)<br/>
<label>Description: </label>#Html.TextBoxFor(model=>model.Package.Description) <br/>
<label>Type: </label>#Html.TextBoxFor(model=>model.Package.Type) <br/>
<button type="submit">submit</button>
}
Doest anyone have any idea why ist like this?? am i doing something wrong(im sure i am :))
thx for every one
How do you expect Allcategories to be populated? Your view contains a field, which posts a value under the name "CategoryName" - there's nothing in your view that populates a list of categories. More importantly; to you really need it to be populated? It seems to me that Allcategories is only really needed for populating the dropdown in the view. On the post, you shouldn't need it. If you DO still need it, you're going to have to either:
Repopulate it in the controller on the HttpPost method:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(PackagemODEL packageModel, FormCollection form)
{
packageModel.Allcategories = new IEnumerable<SelectListItem>();
}
Clutter up your view with pointless hidden fields to pass the values back in (I wouldn't recommend this for a list of items unless you really need to):
#for (int i = 0; i < Model.Allcategories.Count; i++)
{
#Html.HiddenFor( m => m.Allcategories[i])
}
Populate it in the model constructor:
public class PackageModel
{
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Allcategories { get; set; }
public PackageModel()
{
Allcategories = new IEnumerable<SelectListItem>();
/* Add values to Allcategories here */
}
}
If the values of Allcategories doesn't change, you could also consider making it a static readonly property of your model and hardcoding the values (or pulling them from a config file or similar).
As for getting back the selected CategoryName, you need a field in your model in which to store it, otherwise the only way to access it at the moment is via Request.Form:
public class PackageModel
{
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Allcategories { get; set; }
public string CategoryName { get; set; }
}
#Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.CategoryName, Model.Allcategories, Model.Package.Category)
An aside: Please, please, please take your DTO out of your model and set appropriate properties in your model itself. Your DTO does not belong in your view model, which is a model for your view and nothing more.

Categories