We Keep Coding

Programmatically saving a SQL Server database to xml files and restoring it again

I want to save a whole MS SQL 2008 Database into XML files... using asp.net.
Now I am bit lost here.. what would be the best method to achieve this? Datasets?
And I need to restore the database later again.. using these XML files. I am thinking about using datasets for reading the tables and writing to xml and using the SQLBulkCopy class to restore the database again. But I am not sure whether this would be the right approach..
Any clues and tips for me?

If you will need to restore it on the same server type (I mean SQL Server 2008 or higher) and don't care about ability to see actual data inside the XML do the following:
Programmatically backup the DB using "BACKUP DATABASE" T-SQL
Compress the backup
Convert the backup to Base64
Place the backup as the content of the XML file (like: <database name="..." compressionmethod="..." compressionlevel="...">the Base64 content here</database>
On the server where you need to restore it, download the XML, extract the Base64 content, use the attributes to know what compression was used. Decompress and restore using T-SQL "RESTORE" command.
Would that approach work?
For sure, if you need to see the content of the database, you would need to develop the XML scheme, go through each table etc. But, you won't have SPs/Views and other items backed up.

Because you are talking about a CMS, I'm going to assume you are deploying into hosted environments where you might not have command line access.
Now, before I give you the link I want to state that this is a BAD idea. XML is way too verbose to transfer large amounts of data. Further, although it is relatively easy to pull data out, putting it back in will be difficult and a very time consuming development project in itself.
Next alert: as Denis suggested, you are going to miss all of your stored procedures, functions, etc. Your best bet is to use the normal sql server backup / restore process. (Incidentally, I upvoted his answer).
Finally, the last time I dealt with XML and SQL Server we noticed interesting issues that cropped up when data exceeded a 64KB boundary. Basically, at 63.5KB, the queries ran very quickly (200ms). At 64KB, the query times jumped to over a minute and sometimes quite a bit longer. We didn't bother testing anything over 100KB as that was taking 5 minutes on a fast/dedicated server with zero load.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188273.aspx
See this for putting it back in:
How to insert FOR AUTO XML result into table?
For kicks, here is a link talking about pulling the data out as json objects: http://weblogs.asp.net/thiagosantos/archive/2008/11/17/get-json-from-sql-server.aspx
you should also read (not for the faint of heart): http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/consuming-json-strings-in-sql-server/
Of course, the commentors all recommend building something using a CLR approach, but that's probably not available to you in a shared database hosting environment.
At the end of the day, if you are truly insistent on this madness, you might be better served by simply iterating through your table list and exporting all the data to standard CSV files. Then, iterating the CSV files to load the data back in ala C# - is there a way to stream a csv file into database?
Bear in mind that ALL of the above methods suffer from
long processing times due to the data overhead; which leads to
a high potential for failure due to the various time outs (page processing, command, connection, etc); and,
if your data model changes between the time it was exported and reimported then you're back to writing custom translation code and ultimately screwed anyway.
So, only do this if you really really have to and are at least somewhat of a masochist at heart. If the purpose is simply to transfer some data from one installation to another, you might consider using one of the tools like SQL Compare and SQL Data Compare from RedGate to handle the transfer.
I don't care how much (or little) you make, the $1500 investment in their developer bundle is much cheaper than the months of time you are going to spend doing this, fixing it, redoing it, fixing it again, etc. (for the record I do NOT work for them. Their products are just top notch.)

Red Gate's SQL Packager lets you package a database into an exe or to a VS project, so you might want to take a look at that. You can specify which tables you want to consider for data.
Is there any specific reason you want to do this using xml?

Efficient way to analyze large amounts of data?

I need to analyze tens of thousands of lines of data. The data is imported from a text file. Each line of data has eight variables. Currently, I use a class to define the data structure. As I read through the text file, I store each line object in a generic list, List.
I am wondering if I should switch to using a relational database (SQL) as I will need to analyze the data in each line of text, trying to relate it to definition terms which I also currently store in generic lists (List).
The goal is to translate a large amount of data using definitions. I want the defined data to be filterable, searchable, etc. Using a database makes more sense the more I think about it, but I would like to confirm with more experienced developers before I make the changes, yet again (I was using structs and arraylists at first).
The only drawback I can think of, is that the data does not need to be retained after it has been translated and viewed by the user. There is no need for permanent storage of data, therefore using a database might be a little overkill.

It is not absolutely necessary to go a database. It depends on the actual size of the data and the process you need to do. If you are loading the data into a List with a custom class, why not use Linq to do your querying and filtering? Something like:
var query = from foo in List<Foo>
where foo.Prop = criteriaVar
select foo;
The real question is whether the data is so large that it cannot be loaded up into memory confortably. If that is the case, then yes, a database would be much simpler.

This is not a large amount of data. I don't see any reason to involve a database in your analysis.
There IS a query language built into C# -- LINQ. The original poster currently uses a list of objects, so there is really nothing left to do. It seems to me that a database in this situation would add far more heat than light.

It sounds like what you want is a database. Sqlite supports in-memory databases (use ":memory:" as the filename). I suspect others may have an in-memory mode as well.

I was facing the same problem that you faced now while I was working on my previous company.The thing is I was looking a concrete and good solution for a lot of bar code generated files.The bar code generates a text file with thousands of records with in a single file.Manipulating and presenting the data was so difficult for me at first.Based on the records what I programmed was, I create a class that read the file and loads the data to the data table and able to save it in database. The database what I used was SQL server 2005.Then I able to manage the saved data easily and present it which way I like it.The main point is read the data from the file and save to it to the data base.If you do so you will have a lot of options to manipulate and present as the way you like it.

If you do not mind using access, here is what you can do
Attach a blank Access db as a resource
When needed, write the db out to file.
Run a CREATE TABLE statement that handles the columns of your data
Import the data into the new table
Use sql to run your calculations
OnClose, delete that access db.
You can use a program like Resourcer to load the db into a resx file
ResourceManager res = new ResourceManager( "MyProject.blank_db", this.GetType().Assembly );
byte[] b = (byte[])res.GetObject( "access.blank" );
Then use the following code to pull the resource out of the project. Take the byte array and save it to the temp location with the temp filename
"MyProject.blank_db" is the location and name of the resource file
"access.blank" is the tab given to the resource to save

If the only thing you need to do is search and replace, you may consider using sed and awk and you can do searches using grep. Of course on a Unix platform.

From your description, I think linux command line tools can handle your data very well. Using a database may unnecessarily complicate your work. If you are using windows, these tools are also available by different ways. I would recommend cygwin. The following tools may cover your task: sort, grep, cut, awk, sed, join, paste.
These unix/linux command line tools may look scary to a windows person but there are reasons for people who love them. The following are my reasons for loving them:
They allow your skill to accumulate - your knowledge to a partially tool can be helpful in different future tasks.
They allow your efforts to accumulate - the command line (or scripts) you used to finish the task can be repeated as many times as needed with different data, without human interaction.
They usually outperform the same tool you can write. If you don't believe, try to beat sort with your version for terabyte files.

How can I save large amounts of data in C#?

I'm writing a program in C# that will save lots of data points and then later make a graph. What is the best way to save these points?
Can I just use a really long array or should I use a text file or excel file or something like that?
Additional information: It probably wont be more than a couple thousand. And it would be good if I could access it from a windows mobile app. Basically a user will be able to save times that something happens at, and then the app will use the data to find a cross correlation.

If it's millions or even thousands of records, I would probably look at using a database. You can get SQL Server 2008 Express for free, or use MySQL, or something like that.
If you go that route, LINQ to SQL makes database access a piece of cake in .NET. Entity Framework is also available, but LINQ to SQL probably has a quicker time-to-implement.

If you use a text file or excel file, etc. You'll still need to load them back into memory to plot the graph.
So if you're collecting data over a long period of time, or you want to plot the graph some time in the future, write them to a plain text file. When you're ready to plot the graph, load the file up and plot the graph.
If the data collection is within a short period of time, don't bother writing to a file - it'll just add steps to the process for nothing.

A really easy way of doing this would be to serialize your object list into a BinaryWriter or XMLWriter, which automatically format your data into a readable and writable format so that, when your program needs to load the data, all you have to do is deserialize it (1 line of code).
Alternatively, if you have very many records, I suggest trying to use a database. It's quite easy to interface C# with SQL Server (there's a free version called Express Edition) or MySQL, and storing and retrieving huge amounts of data is not a pain. This would be the most efficient way to accomplish your task.
Depending on how much data you have and whether you want to accomplish something like this with 1 line of code (serialization) or interface with a seperate product (the database approach), you can choose either one of the above. Of course, if you wanted to, you could just manually write the contents of your data to a text file or CSV file, as you suggested, but, from personal experience, I recommend the methods I explained above.

It probably wont be more than a couple thousand. And it would be good if I could access it from a windows mobile app. Basically a user will be able to save times that something happens at, and then the app will use the data to find a cross correlation.

Is there any need for interoperability with other processes? If so, time to swat-up on file formats.
However, from the sound of it, you're asking on a matter of "style", with no real requirement to open the file anywhere but your own app. I'd suggest using a BinaryWriter for the task.
If debugging is an issue, a human-readable format might be preferable, but would be considerably larger than the binary equivalent.
Probably the quickest way to do it would be using binary serialization.

Storing settings: XML vs. SQLite?

I am currently writing an IRC client and I've been trying to figure out a good way to store the server settings. Basically a big list of networks and their servers as most IRC clients have.
I had decided on using SQLite but then I wanted to make the list freely available online in XML format (and perhaps definitive), for other IRC apps to use. So now I may just store the settings locally in the same format.
I have very little experience with either ADO.NET or XML so I'm not sure how they would compare in a situation like this.
Is one easier to work with programmatically? Is one faster? Does it matter?

It's a vaguer question than you realize. "Settings" can encompass an awful lot of things.
There's a good .NET infrastructure for handling application settings in configuration files. These, generally, are exposed to your program as properties of a global Settings object; the classes in the System.Configuration namespace take care of reading and persisting them, and there are tools built into Visual Studio to auto-generate the code for dealing with them. One of the data types that this infrastructure supports is StringCollection, so you could use that to store a list of servers.
But for a large list of servers, this wouldn't be my first choice, for a couple of reasons. I'd expect that the elements in your list are actually tuples (e.g. host name, port, description), not simple strings, in which case you'll end up having to format and parse the data to get it into a StringCollection, and that is generally a sign that you should be doing something else. Also, application settings are read-only (under Vista, at least), and while you can give a setting user scope to make it persistable, that leads you down a path that you probably want to understand before committing to.
So, another thing I'd consider: Is your list of servers simply a list, or do you have an internal object model representing it? In the latter case, I might consider using XML serialization to store and retrieve the objects. (The only thing I'd keep in the application configuration file would be the path to the serialized object file.) I'd do this because serializing and deserializing simple objects into XML is really easy; you don't have to be concerned with designing and testing a proper serialization format because the tools do it for you.
The primary reason I look at using a database is if my program performs a bunch of operations whose results need to be atomic and durable, or if for some reason I don't want all of my data in memory at once. If every time X happens, I want a permanent record of it, that's leading me in the direction of using a database. You don't want to use XML serialization for something like that, generally, because you can't realistically serialize just one object if you're saving all of your objects to a single physical file. (Though it's certainly not crazy to simply serialize your whole object model to save one change. In fact, that's exactly what my company's product does, and it points to another circumstance in which I wouldn't use a database: if the data's schema is changing frequently.)

I would personally use XML for settings - .NET is already built to do this and as such has many built-in facilities for storing your settings in XML configuration files.
If you want to use a custom schema (be it XML or DB) for storing settings then I would say that either XML or SQLite will work just as well since you ought to be using a decent API around the data store.

Every tool has its own right
There is plenty of hype arround XML, I know. But you should see, that XML is basically an exchange format -- not a storage format (unless you use a native XML-Database that gives you more options -- but also might add some headaches).
When your configuration is rather small (say less than 10.000 records), you might use XML and be fine. You will load the whole thing into your memory and access the entries there. Done.
But when your configuration is so big, that you dont want to load it completely, than you rethink your decission and stay with SQLite which gives you the option to dynamically load those parts of the configuration you need.
You could also provide a little tool to create a XML file from the DB-content -- creation of XML from a DB is a rather simple task.

Looks like you have two separate applications here: a web server and a desktop client (because that is traditionally where these things run), each with its own storage needs.
On the server side: go with a relational data store, not Xml. Basically at some point you need to keep user data separate from other user data on the server. XML is not a good store for that.
On the client: it doesn't really matter. Xml will probably be easier for you to manipulate. And don't think that because you are using one technology in one setting, you have to use it in the other.

.Net Data Handling Suggestions

I am just beginning to write an application. Part of what it needs to do is to run queries on a database of nutritional information. What I have is the USDA's SR21 Datasets in the form of flat delimited ASCII files.
What I need is advice. I am looking for the best way to import this data into the app and have it easily and quickly queryable at run time. I'll be using it for all the standard things. Populating controls dynamically, Datagrids, calculations, etc. I will also need to do user specific persistent data storage as well. This will not be a commercial app, so hopefully that opens up the possibilities. I am fine with .Net Framework 3.5 so Linq is a possibility when accessing the data (just don't know if it would be the best solution or not). So, what are some suggestions for persistent storage in this scenario? What sort of gotchas should I be watching for? Links to examples are always appreciated of course.

It looks pretty small, so I'd work out an appropriate object model, load the whole lot into memory, and then use LINQ to Objects.
I'm not quite sure what you're asking about in terms of "persistent storage" - aren't you just reading the data? Don't you already have that in the text files? I'm not sure why you'd want to introduce anything else.

I would import the flat files into SQL Server and access via standard ADO.NET functionality. Not only is DB access always better (more robust and powerful) than file I/O as far as data querying and manipulation goes, but you can also take advantage of SQL Server's caching capabilities, especially since this nutritional data won't be changing too often.
If you need to download updated flat files periodically, then look into developing a service that polls for these files and imports into SQL Server automatically.
EDIT: I refer to SQL Server, but feel free to use any DBMS.

My temptation would be to import the data into SQL Server (Express if you aren't looking to deploy the app) as it's a familiar source for me. Alternatively you can probably create an ODBC data source using the text file handler to get you a database-like connection.

I agree that you would benefit from a database, especially for rapid querying, and even more so if you are saving user changes to the data. In order to load the flat file data into a SQL Server (including Express), you can use SSIS.

Use Linq or text data to list method
1.create a list.
2.Read the text file line by line (or all lines).
3.process the line - get required data and attach to the list.
4.process the list for any further use.
the persistence storage will be files and List is volatile.