Using an extension method on a base class in a LINQ query - c#

Apologies in advance for my naivety.
I am using Entity Framework to persist entities I have defined in my domain model. My domain model entities all inherit from my EntityBase class. This has properties I wish to be common to all my entities:
public class EntityBase
{
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime? Created { get; set; }
public int ModifiedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime? Modified { get; set; }
public bool Enabled { get; set; }
public bool Deleted { get; set; }
}
Now when I want to query EF using LINQ it would be nice if I didn't have to include elements to check if a particular entity is Enabled or Deleted. Every query would involve code, for example:
var messages = _db.Memberships.Where(m => m.UserId.Equals(userId))
.SelectMany(m => m.Group.Messages)
.Include(m => m.Group.Category)
.Select(m => m.Enabled && !m.Deleted)
.ToList();
Rather than doing this each time, I thought I would write an extension method which would act on IQueryable
public static IQueryable<EntityBase> Active(this IQueryable<EntityBase> entityCollection)
{
return entityCollection.Where(e => e.Enabled && !e.Deleted);
}
In my naivety I then thought I could just include this in any LINQ query which returns my entities which inherit from the EntityBase class - like so:
var messages = _db.Memberships.Where(m => m.UserId.Equals(userId))
.SelectMany(m => m.Group.Messages)
.Include(m => m.Group.Category)
.Active() <============================= Extension Methd
.ToList();
return Mapper.Map<List<Message>,List<MessageDto>>(messages);
However, the compiler now complains that:
Error 2 Argument 1: cannot convert from
'System.Collections.Generic.List<Diffusr.Business.Entities.EntityBase>' to
'System.Collections.Generic.List<Diffusr.Business.Entities.Message>'
Question : Can I achieve what I want to achieve, i.e. a common method for all my entities to return only Enabled and not Deleted? If so, how?

Instead of specifying a concrete class, use generics, as most extension methods do:
public static IQueryable<T> Active<T>(this IQueryable<T> entityCollection) where T:EntityBase
{
return entityCollection.Where(e => e.Enabled && !e.Deleted);
}
I assume you are using some version of .NET earlier than 4.0. Generic covariance wasn't allowed before 4.0 (ie passing an enumerable of a child type when an enumerable of the base type was expected).
Even after 4.0, it's not the absolute best idea to use covariance as the compiler ends up doing a lot of extra checks to do to ensure type safety whenever you try to store some new value to the List. Jon Skeet has a nice article about this

You can by changing the extension method:
public static IQueryable<T> Active(this IQueryable<T> entityCollection)
where T : EntityBase
{
return entityCollection.Where(e => e.Enabled && !e.Deleted);
}

Related

How to Include a child data's child object in .Net Core

this is my first question. I'm happy to be here.
The question that confused me when I was considering whether to become a member for a long time forced me to become a member.
I have a project, my data class like it :
public class Transactions
{
public int trnid { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("ParentTransactionId")]
public virtual List<Transactions> ParentTransaction { get; set; }
public int? ParentTransactionId { get; set; }
}
Something like it. I've have a generic repository. This is like that.
public Result<List<T>> SelectInclude(Expression<Func<T, object>>[] IncludeParameters, Expression<Func<T, bool>> Filter = null)
{
}
And I use include methods like that.
if (IncludeParameters != null)
{
queryable = IncludeParameters.Aggregate(queryable, (current, include) => current.Include(include));
}
This works pretty well. I pass include parameters like that.
object>>[]
{
x => x.ParentTransaction,
},
How do I get more than child-objects?
ParentTransaction.Select(aa=> aa.ParentTransaction);
But this is not correct, I am getting error using this methods.
Thank you for taking the time.

Nested expression building with linq and Entity Framework

I'm trying to make a service that returns a catalog based on the filters.
I've seen a few results on the internet, but not quite my issue. I hope you can help me with mine.
The issue is that this query build cannot be translated into a store expression:
'LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.Linq.IQueryable'1[App.Data.Models.Subgroup] HasProductsWithState[Subgroup](System.Linq.IQueryable'1[App.Data.Models.Subgroup], System.Nullable`1[System.Boolean])' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.'
How can I make it so the query can be translated into a store expression.
Please don't suggest .ToList() as a answer as I don't want this to run in memory.
So what I have is:
bool? isActive = null;
string search = null;
DbSet<Maingroup> query = context.Set<Maingroup>();
var result = query.AsQueryable()
.HasProductsWithState(isActive)
.HasChildrenWithName(search)
.OrderBy(x => x.SortOrder)
.Select(x => new CatalogViewModel.MaingroupViewModel()
{
Maingroup = x,
Subgroups = x.Subgroups.AsQueryable()
.HasProductsWithState(isActive)
.HasChildrenWithName(search)
.OrderBy(y => y.SortOrder)
.Select(y => new CatalogViewModel.SubgroupViewModel()
{
Subgroup = y,
Products = y.Products.AsQueryable()
.HasProductsWithState(isActive)
.HasChildrenWithName(search)
.OrderBy(z => z.SortOrder)
.Select(z => new CatalogViewModel.ProductViewModel()
{
Product = z
})
})
});
return new CatalogViewModel() { Maingroups = await result.ToListAsync() };
In the code below you can see that I recursively call the extension to try and stack the expression. But when I walk through my code at runtime it does not enter the function again when
return maingroups.Where(x => x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state).Any()) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
is called.
public static class ProductServiceExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> HasProductsWithState<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, bool? state)
{
if (source is IQueryable<Maingroup> maingroups)
{
return maingroups.Where(x => x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state).Any()) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
else if (source is IQueryable<Subgroup> subgroups)
{
return subgroups.Where(x => x.Products.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state).Any()) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
else if (source is IQueryable<Product> products)
{
return products.Where(x => x.IsActive == state) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
return source;
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> HasChildrenWithName<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string search)
{
if (source is IQueryable<Maingroup> maingroups)
{
return maingroups.Where(x => search == null || x.Name.ToLower().Contains(search) || x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasChildrenWithName(search).Any()) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
else if (source is IQueryable<Subgroup> subgroups)
{
return subgroups.Where(x => search == null || x.Name.ToLower().Contains(search) || x.Products.AsQueryable().HasChildrenWithName(search).Any()) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
else if (source is IQueryable<Product> products)
{
return products.Where(x => search == null || x.Name.ToLower().Contains(search)) as IQueryable<TEntity>;
}
return source;
}
}
UPDATE
Missing classes:
public class Maingroup
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
...
public virtual ICollection<Subgroup> Subgroups { get; set; }
}
public class Subgroup
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public long MaingroupId { get; set; }
public virtual Maingroup Maingroup { get; set; }
...
public virtual ICollection<Product> Products { get; set; }
}
public class Product
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public long SubgroupId { get; set; }
public virtual Subgroup Subgroup { get; set; }
...
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
}
The cause of your problem
You have to be aware between an IEnumerable and an IQueryable. An IEnumerable object has everything in it to enumerate over all the elements: you can ask for the first element of the sequence, and once you've got an element, you can ask for the next element, until there are no more elements.
An IQueryable seems similar, however, the IQueryable does not hold everything to enumerate the sequence. It holds an Expression and a Provider. The Expression is a generic form of what must be queried. The Provider knows who must execute the query (usually a database management system), how to communicate with this executor and which language to use (usually something SQL-like).
As soon as you start enumerating, either explicitly by calling GetEnumerator and MoveNext, or implicitly by calling foreach, ToList, FirstOrDefault, Count, etc, the Expression is sent to the Provider, who will translate it into SQL and call the DBMS. The returned data is presented as an IEnumerable object, which is enumerated, using GetEnumerator
Because the Provider has to translate the Expression into SQL, the Expression may only call functions that can be translated into SQL. Alas, the Provider does not know HasProductsWithState, nor any of your own defined functions, and thus can't translate it into SQL. In fact, the entity framework provider also does not know how to translate several standard LINQ functions, and thus they can't be used AsQueryable. See Supported and Unsupported LINQ methods.
So you'll have to stick to functions that return an IQueryable where the Expression contains only supported functions.
Class Description
Alas you forgot to give us your entity classes, so I'll have to make some assumptions about them.
Apparently have a DbContext with at least three DbSets: MainGroups, SubGroups and Products.
There seems to be a one-to-many (or possible many-to-many) relation between MaingGroups and SubGroups: every MainGroup has zero or more SubGroups.
It seems that there is also a one-to-many relation between SubGroups and Products: every SubGroup has zero or more Products.
Alas you forgot to mentions that return relation: does every Product belong to exactly one SubGroup (one-to-many), or does every Product belong to zero or more SubGroups (many-to-many`)?
If you've followed the entity framework code first conventions, you will have classes similar to this:
class MainGroup
{
public int Id {get; set;}
...
// every MainGroup has zero or more SubGroups (one-to-many or many-to-many)
public virtual ICollection<SubGroup> SubGroups {get; set;}
}
class SubGroup
{
public int Id {get; set;}
...
// every SubGroup has zero or more Product(one-to-many or many-to-many)
public virtual ICollection<Product> Products{get; set;}
// alas I don't know the return relation
// one-to-many: every SubGroup belongs to exactly one MainGroup using foreign key
public int MainGroupId {get; set;}
public virtual MainGroup MainGroup {get; set;}
// or every SubGroup has zero or more MainGroups:
public virtual ICollection<MainGroup> MainGroups {get; set;}
}
Something similar for Product:
class Product
{
public int Id {get; set;}
public bool? IsActive {get; set;} // might be a non-nullable property
...
// alas I don't know the return relation
// one-to-many: every Productbelongs to exactly one SubGroup using foreign key
public int SubGroupId {get; set;}
public virtual SubGroup SubGroup {get; set;}
// or every Product has zero or more SubGroups:
public virtual ICollection<SubGroup> SubGroups {get; set;}
}
And of cours your DbContext:
class MyDbContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<MainGroup> MainGroups {get; set;}
public DbSet<SubGroup> SubGroups {get; set;}
public DbSet<Product> Products {get; set;}
}
This is all that entity framework needs to know to detect your tables, the columns in your tables and the relations between the tables (one-to-many, many-to-many, one-to-zero-or-one). Only if you want to deviate from the standard naming you'll need attributes of fluent API.
In entity framework the columns of the tables are represented by non-virtual properties. The virtual properties represent the relations between the tables (one-to-many, many-to-many).
Note that although the SubGroups of a MainGroup is declared as a collection, if you query the SubGroups of the MaingGroup with Id 10 you'll still get an IQueryable.
Requirements
Given a queryable sequence of Products and a nullable Boolean State, HasProductsWithState(products, state) should return the queryable sequence of Products that have a value of IsActive equal to State
Given a queryable sequence of SubGroups and a nullable Boolean State, HasProductsWithState(subGroups, state) should return the queryable sequence of SubGroups that have at least one Product that "HasProductsWithState(Product, State)1
Given a queryable sequence of MainGroups and a nullable Boolean State, HasProductsWithState(mainGroups, state) should return the queryable sequence of MainGroups, that contains all MainGroups that have at least one SubGroup that HasProductsWithState(SubGroup, State)
Solution
Well If you write the requirements like this, the extension methods are easy:
IQueryable<Product> WhereHasState(this IQueryable<Product> products, bool? state)
{
return products.Where(product => product.IsActive == state);
}
Because this function does not check whether a Product has this state, but returns all Product that have this state, I chose to use a different name.
bool HasAnyWithState(this IQueryable<Product> products, bool? state)
{
return products.WhereHasState(state).Any();
}
Your code will be slightly different if IsActive is a non-nullable property.
I'll do something similar with SubGroups:
IQueryable<SubGroup> WhereAnyProductHasState(this IQueryable<SubGroup> subGroups, bool? state)
{
return subgroups.Where(subGroup => subGroup.Products.HasAnyWithState(state));
}
bool HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<SubGroup> subGroups, bool? state)
{
return subGroups.WhereAnyProductHasState(state).Any();
}
Well, you'll know the drill by now for MainGroups:
IQueryable<MainGroup> WhereAnyProductHasState(this IQueryable<MainGroup> mainGroups, bool? state)
{
return maingroups.Where(mainGroup => mainGroup.SubGroups.HasProductsWithState(state));
}
bool HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<MainGroup> mainGroups, bool? state)
{
return mainGroups.WhereAnyProductHasState(state).Any();
}
If you look really closely, you'll see that I didn't use any self-defined function. My function calls will only change the Expression. The changed Expression can be translated into SQL.
I've separated the function into a lot of smaller functions, because you didn't say whether you want to use HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<SubGroup>, bool?) and HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<Product>, bool?).
TODO: do something similar for similar for HasChildrenWithName: separate into smaller functions that contain only LINQ functions, and nothing else
If you'll only call HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<MainGroup>, bool?) you can do it in one function, using `SelectMany:
IQueryable<MainGroup> HasProductsWithState(this IQueryable<MainGroup> mainGroups, bool? state)
{
return mainGroups
.Where(mainGroup => mainGroup.SelectMany(mainGroup.SubGroups)
.SelectMany(subGroup => subGroup.Products)
.Where(product => product.IsActive == state)
.Any() );
}
But when I walk through my code at runtime it does not enter the function again when
return maingroups.Where(x => x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state)
Welcome to the world of expression trees!
x => x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state)
is lambda expression (Expression<Func<...>) with body
x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state)
The body is expression tree, in other words - code as data, hence is never executed (except if compiled to delegate as in LINQ to Objects).
It's easily overlooked since visually lambda expressions look like delegates. Even Harald in their answer after all explanations that one should not use custom methods, as a solution actually provides several custom methods with the rationale "I didn't use any self-defined function. My function calls will only change the Expression. The changed Expression can be translated into SQL". Sure, but if your functions are called! Which of course does not happen when they are inside expression tree.
With that being said, there is no good general solution. What I can offer is solution for your particular problem - transforming custom methods which receive IQueryable<T> plus other simple parameters and return IQueryable<T>.
The idea is to use custom ExpressionVisitor which identifies the "calls" to such method inside expression tree, actually calls them and replaces them with the result of the call.
The problem is to call
x.Subgroups.AsQueryable().HasProductsWithState(state)
when we have no actual x object. The trick is to call them with fake queryable expression (like LINQ to Objects Enumerable<T>.Empty().AsQueryble()) and then use another expression visitor to replace the fake expression with the original expression in the result (pretty much like string.Replace, but for expressions).
Here is the sample implementation of the above:
public static class QueryTransformExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> TransformFilters<T>(this IQueryable<T> source)
{
var expression = new TranformVisitor().Visit(source.Expression);
if (expression == source.Expression) return source;
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(expression);
}
class TranformVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
protected override Expression VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression node)
{
if (node.Method.IsStatic && node.Method.Name.StartsWith("Has")
&& node.Type.IsGenericType && node.Type.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IQueryable<>)
&& node.Arguments.Count > 0 && node.Arguments.First().Type == node.Type)
{
var source = Visit(node.Arguments.First());
var elementType = source.Type.GetGenericArguments()[0];
var fakeQuery = EmptyQuery(elementType);
var args = node.Arguments
.Select((arg, i) => i == 0 ? fakeQuery : Evaluate(Visit(arg)))
.ToArray();
var result = (IQueryable)node.Method.Invoke(null, args);
var transformed = result.Expression.Replace(fakeQuery.Expression, source);
return Visit(transformed); // Apply recursively
}
return base.VisitMethodCall(node);
}
static IQueryable EmptyQuery(Type elementType) =>
Array.CreateInstance(elementType, 0).AsQueryable();
static object Evaluate(Expression source)
{
if (source is ConstantExpression constant)
return constant.Value;
if (source is MemberExpression member)
{
var instance = member.Expression != null ? Evaluate(member.Expression) : null;
if (member.Member is FieldInfo field)
return field.GetValue(instance);
if (member.Member is PropertyInfo property)
return property.GetValue(instance);
}
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
static Expression Replace(this Expression source, Expression from, Expression to) =>
new ReplaceVisitor { From = from, To = to }.Visit(source);
class ReplaceVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
public Expression From;
public Expression To;
public override Expression Visit(Expression node) =>
node == From ? To : base.Visit(node);
}
}
Now all you need is to call .TransformFilters() extension methods at the end of your queries, for instance in your sample
var result = query.AsQueryable()
// ...
.TransformFilters();
You can also call it on intermediate queries. Just make sure the call is outside expression tree :)
Note that the sample implementation is processing static methods having first parameter IQueryable<T>, returning IQueryable<T> and name starting with Has. The last is to skip Queryable and EF extension methods. In the real code you should use some better criteria - for instance the type of the defining class, or custom attribute etc.

Expression<TDelegate> on EF Include Statement

Hello so I am trying to make an some a bit more dynamic, that said i would like to be able to pass in an expression that will include the entities that I am trying to include. when i am trying to do this i keep getting an error that says:
The Include path expression must refer to a navigation property defined on the type. Use dotted paths for reference navigation properties and the Select operator for collection navigation properties.
I have googled this error and saw that they were doing what i can get to work:
context.Contacts.Include(contact=>contact.PhoneNumber)
what I am trying to do is this:
Func<IEntity, IEntity> func = (contact) => ((Contact)contact).PhoneNumber;
Expression<Func<IEntity, IEntity>> expression = (contact)=> func(contact);
context.Contacts.Include(expression);
can someone please expain what I am doing wrong and why?
public interface IEntity
{
int Id { get; set; }
}
public class Contact:IEntity
{
public int Id {get;set;}
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public int PhoneNumberId { get; set; }
public PhoneNumber PhoneNumber { get; set; }
}
public class PhoneNumber:IEntity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Number { get; set; }
}
UPDATE:
I have a repository class that looks at the type of class and uses reflection to get the correct DbSet and returns a IQueryable.
public IQueryable Get(IEntity t)
{
var setMethod = typeof(DbContext)
.GetMethod(nameof(DbContext.Set))
.MakeGenericMethod(t.getType());
var query = (IQueryable)setMethod.Invoke(db, null);
var results = query...
}
I have a table control that goes and gets the correct data using the typeRepository. So I am trying to be able to include entities to that table.
When you don't have a generic type argument, but simple Type parameter, you'd better use the non generic DbContext and IQueryable services provided by EF.
First, you don't need reflection - DbContext provides non generic Set method with Type argument:
public virtual DbSet Set(Type entityType)
As for Include, you can simply use the non generic Include extension method with string argument:
public static IQueryable Include(this IQueryable source, string path)
So the method in question can be implemented like this:
IQueryable query = db.Set(t.GetType());
if (t is Contact)
query = query.Include(nameof(Contact.PhoneNumber));
Not the best OOP practices, but works for the chosen design.
I believe your issue relates to the delegate type you are assigning to your Func. IE: Func<IEntity, IEntity> func
In which case IEntity does not have a navigation property defined of type IEntity
Try assigning the concrete type for your implementation
Func<Contact, PhoneNumber> func

Specification inside LINQ with EF 4.3

I stumbled trying to use my specification inside a LINQ query. The trouble here is with my specification with params.
Let's fake a simple scenario:
public class Car {
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Color { get; set; }
public int UsedPieces { get; set; }
// whatever properties
}
public class Piece {
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Color { get; set; }
// whatever properties
}
public static class PieceSpecifications : ISpecification<Piece> {
public static ISpecification<Piece> WithColor(string color) {
return new Specification<Piece>(p => p.Color == color);
}
}
what I'm actually trying to do
// Get accepts ISpecification and returns IQueryable<Car> to force just one call to database
var carWithPieces = _carRepository.Get(CarSpecifications.UsedPiecesGreaterThan(10));
var piecesWithColor = from p in _pieceRepository.Get()
let car = carWithPieces.FirstOrDefault() // entire query will does one call to database
where PieceSpecifications.WithColor(car.Color).IsSatisfiedBy(p) // unfortunately it isn't possible
// where p.Color == car.Color -> it works, but it's not what I want
select p;
I know it's a little bit confusing, but I'm trying to avoid a lot of roundtrips inside my real(big) scenario and I know that actually it's impossible to do using raw LINQ with entity framework. I'm tired to try so many blogs and failed(mine) approaches.
Someone knows some real good approach. There's another way to do that?
Error
System.NotSupportedException: LINQ to Entities does not recognize the
method 'Boolean IsSatisfiedBy(App.Model.Piece)' method, and this
method cannot be translated into a store expression.
UPDATE
Basic Specification Pattern
public class Specification<T> : ISpecification<T> {
private readonly Expression<Func<T, bool>> _predicate;
public Specification(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate) {
_predicate = predicate;
}
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> Predicate {
get { return _predicate; }
}
public bool IsSatisfiedBy(T entity) {
return _predicate.Compile().Invoke(entity);
}
}
UPDATE
It's pretty easy neat if I do this
// call to database
var car = _carRepository
.Get(CarSpecifications.UsedPiecesGreaterThan(10))
.FirstOrDefault();
// Whoah! look I'm working, but calling to database again.
var piecesWithColor = _pieceRepository
.Get(PieceSpecifications.WithColor(car.Color))
.ToArray();
Repository
// The Get function inside repository accepts ISpecification<T>.
public IQueryable<T> Get(ISpecification<T> specification) {
return Set.Where(specification.Predicate);
}
You can't compile and invoke expression if you want to use it in LINQ-to-entities query. Try to use Predicate directly because LINQ-to-entities builds expression tree which is evaluated by EF LINQ provider and translated to SQL.
IMHO using specification this way doesn't make sense. LINQ-to-entities query is a composite specification. So either use Linq-to-entities or build your own query language using specification and let your repository translate your query to LINQ query.
Take a look at using AsExpandable extension method.
http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqkit.aspx
Maybe make IsSatisfiedBy() and extension method to IQueryable. Here is K. Scott Allen's approach:
http://odetocode.com/Blogs/scott/archive/2012/03/19/avoiding-notsupportedexception-with-iqueryable.aspx

Extension Methods not working for an interface

Inspired by the MVC storefront the latest project I'm working on is using extension methods on IQueryable to filter results.
I have this interface;
IPrimaryKey
{
int ID { get; }
}
and I have this extension method
public static IPrimaryKey GetByID(this IQueryable<IPrimaryKey> source, int id)
{
return source(obj => obj.ID == id);
}
Let's say I have a class, SimpleObj which implements IPrimaryKey. When I have an IQueryable of SimpleObj the GetByID method doesn't exist, unless I explicitally cast as an IQueryable of IPrimaryKey, which is less than ideal.
Am I missing something here?
It works, when done right. cfeduke's solution works. However, you don't have to make the IPrimaryKey interface generic, in fact, you don't have to change your original definition at all:
public static IPrimaryKey GetByID<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, int id) where T : IPrimaryKey
{
return source(obj => obj.ID == id);
}
Edit: Konrad's solution is better because its far simpler. The below solution works but is only required in situations similar to ObjectDataSource where a method of a class is retrieved through reflection without walking up the inheritance hierarchy. Obviously that's not happening here.
This is possible, I've had to implement a similar pattern when I designed a custom entity framework solution for working with ObjectDataSource:
public interface IPrimaryKey<T> where T : IPrimaryKey<T>
{
int Id { get; }
}
public static class IPrimaryKeyTExtension
{
public static IPrimaryKey<T> GetById<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, int id) where T : IPrimaryKey<T>
{
return source.Where(pk => pk.Id == id).SingleOrDefault();
}
}
public class Person : IPrimaryKey<Person>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
Snippet of use:
var people = new List<Person>
{
new Person { Id = 1 },
new Person { Id = 2 },
new Person { Id = 3 }
};
var personOne = people.AsQueryable().GetById(1);
This cannot work due to the fact that generics don't have the ability to follow inheritance patterns. ie. IQueryable<SimpleObj> is not in the inheritance tree of IQueryable<IPrimaryKey>

Categories