Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 9 years ago.
Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Include attempted solutions, why they didn't work, and the expected results. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Improve this question
I have this third-party app that I am inheriting from that keeps stealing my subscription to the UnhandledException event (and suppressing all exceptions) and I am thinking about how I can tell whether the UnhandledExceptionEvent was stolen from me or not (since it only allows 1 subscriber). The third-party app keeps doing it at different periods so I am thinking of fighting back with a timer and stealing the third-party's subscription to the UnhandledException event. The problem with the third-party app is that I have no control over it. Any better ideas?
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
In Visual Studio 2013 with Resharper, is there some way to check, if i have any uncaught exceptions in my project?
You can use the Agent Johnson plugin for Resharper which has static exception checks. See the following link:
https://code.google.com/p/agentjohnsonplugin/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Include attempted solutions, why they didn't work, and the expected results. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to make a voting system on my website. The voting is about food, what food is getting ordered for tomorrow.
Now I want to make something like this (i made it with paint just to show you what im asking):
Is there anyway I can do this? Now... I haven't tried anything yet because I don't know how to start. All I'm asking from you, is to refer me somewhere/something, anything, that might help me with this.
Have a look at the example about Add a Quick Poll to Your Web Site on MSDN.
You can probably look at this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/372501/best-net-polling-survey-software
and this
http://voting-asp.net/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
when I run the following procedure:
sp_who
#loginame = 'myloginname'
I see a number of rows with "status" = "suspended" column. What does this mean?
Also how can I avoid from this?
Any helps would be appreciated.
From BOL, it is "The session is waiting for an event, such as I/O, to complete." http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms174313.aspx
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions concerning problems with code you've written must describe the specific problem — and include valid code to reproduce it — in the question itself. See SSCCE.org for guidance.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it possible to completely turn off garbage collection in C#? I'm debugging some hairy managed/native interop memory errors and I'd like to quickly rule out the possibility that GC is freeing native objects that I still need.
That's not possible.
Testing for this kind of bug scenario is done exactly the opposite way: you force a garbage collection before or after the interop call.
That's built into the debugger. It has two managed debugging assistants that can force a GC on an interop transition, gcManagedToUnmanaged and gcUnmanagedToManaged. Enable them in your .config file as shown in the linked article.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 9 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Include attempted solutions, why they didn't work, and the expected results. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist
Improve this question
I am looking for CLI specification.
Where can I find it to download?
I think you're after ECMA 335.
Why not ask google?
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm
There is a whole host of C# and CLI specification documents here.