In class below, I would like to sometimes pass just an array of strings for the property 'BodyParameters'.
Is that possible without using object type as its parameter type? Most times, this property will be a List of string [ ] arrays when the class is used.
public class EmailTemplate
{
...
public IList<string[]> BodyParameters { get; set; }
...
}
If you want to set BodyParameters using only a single string[], you can do this:
string[] value = ...;
myEmailTemplate.BodyParameters = new [] { value };
There is no implicit conversion from T to IList<T>, where T is string[] in your case.
The above code will work because new [] { ... } will infer the type string[][], which implements IList<string[]>.
Related
I'm writing a service to retrieve data from an API over HTTP from another team in my company. The JSON response body from their API looks a bit like this:
"SomeObject": {
"SomeInnerObject": {
"SomeProperty": {
"Id": "123",
"Type": "abc",
"Name": "some value"
}
}
}
I'm writing a C# class to store the data in memory in order to do some comparisons. The nesting of the JSON object causes the class to look annoyingly repetitive:
public class MyClass
{
public SomeObjectModel SomeObject { get; set; }
public class SomeObjectModel
{
public SomeInnerObjectModel InnerObject { get; set; }
public class SomeInnerObjectModel
{
// etc...
}
}
}
I know for sure that the inner classes, like "SomeObjectModel", are only going to be read from and not instantiated elsewhere, so is there a way to combine the class definition and property definition lines into something more like this?
public class MyClass
{
public SomeObject { get; set; } :
{
public SomeInnerObject { get; set; } :
{
// etc...
}
}
}
EDIT:
The JSON will have arrays in it, so take that into account if you are proposing an alternative using generics, etc.
If you're using this just to deserialize the JSON, you don't even need to define a class.. You can use a nested anonymous type.
First, create and populate (with dummy values) an anonymous type that has the properties you need to be able to read. Then pass it as the second parameter to DeserializeAnonymousType<T>(string,T).
The result is a new instance of the same anonymous type that you created, but now it's populated with values from the JSON.
var json = #"{'SomeObject': {'SomeInnerObject': {'SomeProperty': {'Id': '123','Type': 'abc','Name': 'some value'}}}}";
var template = new
{
SomeObject = new
{
SomeInnerObject = new
{
SomeProperty = new
{
Id = default(int),
Type = default(string),
Name = default(string)
}
}
}
};
var result = JsonConvert.DeserializeAnonymousType(json, template);
var id = result.SomeObject.SomeInnerObject.SomeProperty.Id;
var type = result.SomeObject.SomeInnerObject.SomeProperty.Type;
var name = result.SomeObject.SomeInnerObject.SomeProperty.Name;
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", id, type, name);
Output:
123 abc some value
See my working example on DotNetFiddle.
Edit: If your JSON contains an array, you can use new[] {} to create an array based on type inference and then put the anonymous types inside, like this:
var json = #"{ 'SomeObjects': [ { 'Id': '123', 'Name': 'some value' }, { 'Id': '456', 'Name': 'another value' } ]}";
var template = new
{
SomeObjects = new [] { new { Id=default(int), Name=default(string)} }
};
The short answer is no, C# does not support any version of that syntactic sugar. The closest thing in C# is probably either anonymous types or value tuples.
Other languages have similar features:
C++ supports "inline classes" in declarations.
Java supports anonymous classes that are more sophisticated than C# anonymous record types.
Scala supports case classes which declare their members in the header of the declaration.
And so on. I think the first is the closest thing to what you are looking for.
Scala-style class declarations have been proposed for C# many times in the last decade, and may finally make it into C# 8; see https://blog.cdemi.io/whats-coming-in-c-8-0-records/
You can use the dynamic type. Here is a minimal example:
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System;
namespace ConsoleApp1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
dynamic x = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject("[{key: '1001', value: 'test'}, {key: '1002', value: 'test2'}, ]");
Console.WriteLine(x[0].key);
Console.WriteLine(x[0].value);
Console.WriteLine(x[1].key);
Console.WriteLine(x[1].value);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
You can create classes by using the paste special, paste JSON as classes.
https://channel9.msdn.com/Series/Windows-Store-Developer-Solutions/Quckly-Generate-C-Classes-from-JSON-Responses#time=01m56s
The following seems to be a class array?
Chemical.ChemicalName[IndexNumber]
It seems that there are several other fields associated with Chemical, such as Cost, Quantity, SupplierName (Chemical.Cost etc).
I was wondering what this type of variable is called? A class array? I've been searching online about arrays and can't seem to find any documentation on this.
And secondly, how do I declare such a variable?
Assuming it's a property, not an array , so you cannot access using an index,
public class Chemical
{
// Field
public string ChemicalName;
...etc
}
if chemical is an array , then you can declare like this,
Chemical[] Chemicals = new Chemical[200];
Then you can access the particular element using the index,
Chemicals[IndexNumber].ChemicalName
EDIT
If you want to have ChemicalName as a array inside the class,
public class Chemical{
public ChemicalName[] ChemicalNames = new ChemicalName[5];
]
you can access like this,
Chemical[] Chemicals = new Chemical[200];
c[index].ChemicalNames[index];
Variable would look something like that
public class Chemical{
public ChemicalName[] ChemicalNames = new ChemicalName[5];
...
}
So you can invoke it like that
Chemical c = new Chemical();
c.ChemicalNames[index];
OR, you can also declare the Array as static so you wont need an intance of the class to get the array e.g.
public class Chemical{
public static ChemicalName[] ChemicalNames = new ChemicalName[5];
...
}
to call a static, simply use class.variable/method name
Chemical.ChemicalNames[index];
It is a class property that implements an indexer. Usually this is an array, but it can be something else as long as it implements this[int index].
You can declare one by declaring it as a class property. For example,
class Book
{
public Book(int numPages)
{
Pages = new Page[numPages];
}
public Page[] Pages {get;}
}
You can then instantiate an instance and access a page.
Book myBook = new Book(100);
myBook.Pages[50]=new Page("Hi, welcome to Page 50");
Console.Write(myBook.Pages[50].GetText());
Let me consider this statement from the question Chemical.ChemicalName[IndexNumber], We can consider Chemical as a class or as an object of some other class. If it is a class means the ChemicalName will be a static.
Then comes the ChemicalName definitely it will be a collection(List/Array or something like that) or even an object of a class which having an indexer.
Case 1: consider Chemical is class and ChemicalName is a List of string So the Definition will be :
public class Chemical
{
public static List<string> ChemicalNames = new List<string>(){"name1","name 2"};
}
So that you can access a single name like the following:
string someChemicalName=Chemical.ChemicalNames[0]; // will be name1
Case 2: consider Chemical is an object of a class and ChemicalName is a List of string So the Definition will be :
public class Chemicals
{
public List<string> ChemicalNames;
}
Then you can access create the Chemical by using the following code:
Chemicals Chemical= new Chemicals();
Chemical.ChemicalNames=new List<string>(){"name1","name 2"};
Here also you can workout your statement like this
string someChemicalName=Chemical.ChemicalNames[0]; // will be name1
Let's parse Chemical.ChemicalName[IndexNumber]:
IndexNumber is probably some value of one of integer types - let guess int IndexNumber. Other options could be enum or any type as you can use indexer with any arguments.
[IndexNumber] is indexing something. Since there is no
Static Indexers? in C# it means ChemicalName can't be class name of static class like following
namespace Chemical {
static class ChemicalName{}
}
so it means that ChemicalName is either property or field of Chemical.
Now for Chemical there are more options
it could be static class with ChemicalName as static property:
static class Chemical{
public static string[] ChemicalName = new[] {"Food", "Poison"};
}
it could be local variable of some type that has ChemicalName as instance property:
class ChemicalType{
public string[] ChemicalName = new[] {"Food", "Poison"};
}
...
void MyMethod()
{
// implicitly typed, same as `ChemicalType Chemical`
var Chemical = new ChemicalType();
int IndexNumber = 1;
Console.WriteLine(Chemical.ChemicalName[IndexNumber]);
}
it could be field or property of your class (with any accessibility as to get Checmical.ChemicalName syntax to work for property it need to be used inside a method of your class)
class MyClass
{
// one of any combination:
// private field
ChemicalType Chemical = new ChemicalType();
// or protected automatic property
protected ChemicalType Chemical {get;set;}
// or public property
ChemicalType _chemical;
public ChemicalType Chemical {get {return _chemical;}}
...
}
Finally let's see what ChemicalName could be: the only requirement is to allow indexer by some type. including int. This gives very broad set of types as many of built in types support indexing.
array is most common one string[] ChemicalName
just string - somewhat strange given name of variable, but possible - string ChemicalName. When indexing will give single char result
List<string>
dictionary, this option allows broader range of indexing - i.e. by strings Dictionary<string,string> ChemicalName.
custom type implementing similar to public string this[int i] (or any other return type).
I have this class :
public class User
{
public int Id;
public ICollection<Role> Roles;
}
And I have this object :
User userObj = new User { Id = 1 };
I want set this array :
RolesVM.Items.Split(new string[] { "\r\n" }, StringSplitOptions.None);
For :
userObj.Roles
When assign the string[] array to the Roles, I'm getting this error:
Cannot implicitly convert type 'string[]' to 'System.Collections.Generic.ICollection
How can I do this ?
There is no magical way to transform string to other type. You need to call code that creates objects of that type somehow.
I.e. if role have constructor taking a string argument:
userObj.Roles =
RolesVM.Items.Split(new string[] {"\r\n" }, StringSplitOptions.None)
.Select(value => new role(value)) // "convert" strings to `role`
.ToList(); // transform enumerable to type that implements ICollection (List)
Depending on your role type new role(value) may need to be replaced with other conversion like new role{ Value = value} or for enums - Enum.Parse(typeof(role), value).
hi I need dynamic array in attribute in c#
for example:
public class MyHtmlAttributesAttribute : System.Attribute
{
private IDictionary<string, string> Attrib { get; set; }
public MyHtmlAttributesAttribute()
{
Attrib = new Dictionary<string, string>();
}
public MyHtmlAttributesAttribute(params string[][] values)
: this()
{
foreach (var item in values)
{
if (item.Count() < 1)
throw new Exception("bad length array");
this.Attrib.Add(item[0].ToLower(), item[1]);
}
}
}
but when I want use this attribute I get error :
Array initializers can only be used in a variable or field initializer. Try using a new expression instead
I use this attribute by this style:
public class LoginViewModel
{
[Required]
[MyHtmlAttributes(new string[][]{{"Class", "ltr"}, {"AutoCompleteType" , "Disabled"}})]
public string Email { get; set; }
...
..
}
thank you for answer
The problem is not in the attribute in this case, but in the array initialization. {{"Class", "ltr"}, {"AutoCompleteType" , "Disabled"}} could be used in an array initializer, but not in a new[] expression.
With new expression: new string[][] {new string[] { "Class", "ltr" }, new string[]{ "AutoCompleteType", "Disabled" } };
But since params is used, the encapsulating new string[] can be omitted:
[MyHtmlAttributes(new string[]{"Class", "ltr"}, new string[]{"AutoCompleteType" , "Disabled"})]
The following is purely an alternative
An alternative is to allow multiple instances of the attribute to be applied, and combine them when obtaining them.
To allow multiple attributes:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple=true)]
public class MyHtmlAttributesAttribute : System.Attribute
Apply them as
[MyHtmlAttributes("Class", "ltr")]
[MyHtmlAttributes("AutoCompleteType", "Disabled")]
public string Email { get; set; }
Of course the constructor and implementation of the attribute has to be altered to allow only a single attr-value pair, but adding/removing a pair should only be easier this way. Combining them by reading all the MyHtmlAttributes instances on a property should be straight forward enough.
How do I instantiate an array property using Reflection based on the code below?
public class Foo
{
public Foo()
{
foreach(var property in GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (property.PropertyType.IsArray)
{
// the line below creates a 2D array of type Bar. How to fix?
var array = Array.CreateInstance(property.PropertyType, 0);
property.SetValue(this, array, null);
}
}
}
public Bar[] Bars {get;set;}
}
public class Bar
{
public string Name {get;set;}
}
The first parameter of Array.CreateInstance expects the element type of the array. You pass the entire property type, which is, as you have just found out by checking property.PropertyType.IsArray, an array type (specifically, Bar[] - i.e. an array of Bar elements).
To get the element type of an array type, use its GetElementType method:
var array = Array.CreateInstance(property.PropertyType.GetElementType(), 0);
I suppose you will replace the zero passed to the second argument with a higher number when required, unless you actually want only empty arrays.