Related
is there a short way,
I don't want to use "if state" for every situation
what do you think
Description : type of query is IQueryable
public class OrderFilter{
public string SearchValue { get => _searchValue.ToLower(); set => _searchValue = value; }
public string[] SearchColumns { get; set; }
}
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderFilter.SearchValue))
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("warehouse"))
query = query.Where(x => x.Warehouse.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue));
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("date"))
query = query.Where(x => x.Date.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue));
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("warehouse") && orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("date"))
query = query.Where(x => x.OrderNo.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Warehouse.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Client.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Date.ToString().Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Salesman.Username.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
);
}
Access nested properties with dynamic lambda using Linq.Expression
found the answer I was looking for
public class LambdaHelper
{
public Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> MultiSearchOrder<TSource>(string[] columns, string value)
{
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "x"); // x=> . ... demektir. parametre
MethodInfo containsMethod = typeof(String).GetMethod("Contains", new Type[] { typeof(String) });
Expression dynamiclambda = null;
MethodCallExpression call = null;
foreach (var propertyName in columns)
{
MemberExpression propertyAccess = NestedExpressionProperty(parameter, propertyName);
call = Expression.Call(propertyAccess, containsMethod, Expression.Constant(value));
if (null == dynamiclambda)
{
dynamiclambda = call;
}
else
{
dynamiclambda = Expression.Or(dynamiclambda, call);
}
}
Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(dynamiclambda, parameter);
return predicate;
}
private MemberExpression NestedExpressionProperty(Expression expression, string propertyName)
{
string[] parts = propertyName.Split('.');
int partsL = parts.Length;
return (partsL > 1)
?
Expression.Property(
NestedExpressionProperty(
expression,
parts.Take(partsL - 1)
.Aggregate((a, i) => a + "." + i)
),
parts[partsL - 1])
:
Expression.Property(expression, propertyName);
}
I think you add one property (SearchKey) that property contains of all properties value that used for search in writing time and you using this property instead of OR for example :
savingTime: SearhKey="OrderNo.value Warehouse.Description.Value ...."
Searching Time:
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderFilter.SearchValue))
{
query = query.Where(x =>
x.SearchKey.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue) );
}
you can do an extension o OrderFilter and reuse it :
public static bool HasAny<TSource>(this OrderFilter filter, IEnumerable<TSource> source)
{
if(filter == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter));
if(filter.SearchColumns == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter.SearchColumns));
if(string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(filter.SearchValue))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter.SearchValue));
if(source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
var properties = typeof(TSource).GetProperties().Where(x=> filter.SearchColumns.Any(s=> s.IndexOf(x.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) > 0));
foreach(var item in source)
{
foreach(var property in properties)
{
var value = property.GetValue(item)?.ToString();
if(value?.Equals(filter.SearchValue , StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) == true)
{
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
now you can do this :
var isValueExists = orderFilter.HasAny(query);
I'm creating some extension methods on IQueryable to make wildcard filtering easier. But I'm stumbling into a lot of exceptions when I try to filter a sub list. My example:
public class User {
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public IReadOnlyList<Address> Addresses { get; set; }
...
}
public class Address {
public string Street { get; set; }
...
}
My wildcard implementation speaks for itself, the method expects a list of values and supports StartsWith, EndsWith and Contains. I have a Filter method that looks like this:
public static IQueryable<T> Filter<T>(this IQueryable<T> query, Expression<Func<T, string>> property,
IList<string> values)
{
if (values == null || values.Count == 0)
return query;
Expression<Func<T, bool>> condition;
if (values.Count == 1)
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromString(property, values.First()).Expand();
else
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromStringList(property, values).Expand();
return query.Where(condition);
}
And the expressions builders look like:
private static Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetBooleanExpressionFromStringList<T>(
Expression<Func<T, string>> expression,
IList<string> values)
{
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.New<T>();
foreach (var value in values)
{
var parsedValue = value.Replace("*", string.Empty);
if (value.StartsWith("*") && value.EndsWith("*"))
predicate.Or(x => expression.Invoke(x).Contains(parsedValue));
else if (value.StartsWith("*"))
predicate.Or(x => expression.Invoke(x).EndsWith(parsedValue));
else if (value.EndsWith("*"))
predicate.Or(x => expression.Invoke(x).StartsWith(parsedValue));
else predicate.Or(x => expression.Invoke(x) == parsedValue);
}
return predicate;
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetBooleanExpressionFromString<T>(
Expression<Func<T, string>> expression,
string value)
{
var parsedValue = value.Replace("*", string.Empty);
if (value.StartsWith("*") && value.EndsWith("*"))
return x => expression.Invoke(x).Contains(parsedValue);
if (value.StartsWith("*"))
return x => expression.Invoke(x).EndsWith(parsedValue);
if (value.EndsWith("*"))
return x => expression.Invoke(x).StartsWith(parsedValue);
return x => expression.Invoke(x) == parsedValue;
}
At the end I can use the Filter method like this:
var query = Session.Query<User>();
query = query.Filter(x => x.FirstName, new [] { "Foo*", "*Bar", "*test*" });
return query;
Now I want to make the same extension for the Street property of the Address list. In normal Linq it would compile to query.Where(x => x.Addresses.Any(y => y.Street.*wildcardstuff*)) and the Filter method would be called like query.Filter(x => x.Addresses, x => x.Street, values). But I'm keep getting NotSupported exceptions. The last thing I tried is this post from EF but its not that typed like i want it to be.
The last implementation I tried is this one:
public static IQueryable<T> FilterList<T, U>(this IQueryable<T> query, Expression<Func<T, IEnumerable<U>>> innerList, Expression<Func<U, string>> property,
IList<string> values)
{
if (values == null || values.Count == 0)
return query;
Expression<Func<U, bool>> condition;
if (values.Count == 1)
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromString(property, values.First()).Expand();
else
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromStringList(property, values).Expand();
return query.Where(i => innerList.Invoke(i).Any(j => condition.Invoke(j)));
}
but got this exception: System.NotSupportedException: Cannot parse expression 'x => x.Addresses' as it has an unsupported type. Only query sources (that is, expressions that implement IEnumerable) and query operators can be parsed.
I tried to make an extension on string with the wildcard logic but this throws also a NotSupported exception, anyone has an idea?
I would make it more universal. Which may simplify creating such extensions.
query = query.FilterByWildcard(x => x.FirstName, new [] { "Foo*", "*Bar", "*test*" });
And realization:
public static class QueryExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> FilterByWildcard<T>(this IQueryable<T> query, Expression<Func<T, string>> prop, IEnumerable<string> items)
{
return query.FilterBy(items, prop, s =>
{
var pattern = s.Trim('*');
if (s.StartsWith("*"))
if (s.EndsWith("*"))
return e => e.Contains(pattern);
else
return e => e.StartsWith(pattern);
else if (s.EndsWith("*"))
return e => e.EndsWith(pattern);
else
return e => e == s;
});
}
public static IQueryable<T> FilterBy<T, TProp, TItem>(this IQueryable<T> query,
IEnumerable<TItem> items,
Expression<Func<T, TProp>> prop,
Func<TItem, Expression<Func<TProp, bool>>> operationSelector, bool isOr = true)
{
var param = prop.Parameters[0];
Expression predicate = null;
foreach (var item in items)
{
var operation = operationSelector(item);
var body = ExpressionReplacer.GetBody(operation, prop.Body);
if (predicate == null)
{
predicate = body;
}
else
{
predicate = Expression.MakeBinary(isOr ? ExpressionType.OrElse : ExpressionType.AndAlso, predicate,
body);
}
}
if (predicate == null)
return query.Where(e => 1 == 2);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(predicate, param);
return query.Where(lambda);
}
class ExpressionReplacer : ExpressionVisitor
{
readonly IDictionary<Expression, Expression> _replaceMap;
public ExpressionReplacer(IDictionary<Expression, Expression> replaceMap)
{
_replaceMap = replaceMap ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(replaceMap));
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression exp)
{
if (exp != null && _replaceMap.TryGetValue(exp, out var replacement))
return replacement;
return base.Visit(exp);
}
public static Expression Replace(Expression expr, Expression toReplace, Expression toExpr)
{
return new ExpressionReplacer(new Dictionary<Expression, Expression> {{toReplace, toExpr}}).Visit(expr);
}
public static Expression Replace(Expression expr, IDictionary<Expression, Expression> replaceMap)
{
return new ExpressionReplacer(replaceMap).Visit(expr);
}
public static Expression GetBody(LambdaExpression lambda, params Expression[] toReplace)
{
if (lambda.Parameters.Count != toReplace.Length)
throw new InvalidOperationException();
return new ExpressionReplacer(lambda.Parameters.Zip(toReplace)
.ToDictionary(e => (Expression)e.First, e => e.Second)).Visit(lambda.Body);
}
}
}
This answer is fixing my own method but Svyatoslav Danyliv's answer is more futureproof.
public static IQueryable<T> FilterList<T, U>(this IQueryable<T> query, Expression<Func<T, IEnumerable<U>>> innerList, Expression<Func<U, string>> property,
IList<string> values)
{
if (values == null || values.Count == 0)
return query;
Expression<Func<U, bool>> condition;
if (values.Count == 1)
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromString(property, values.First());
else
condition = GetBooleanExpressionFromStringList(property, values);
Expression<Func<T, bool>> finalCondition = t => innerList.Invoke(t).Any(j => condition.Invoke(j));
return query.Where(finalCondition.Expand());
}
And then use it like this.
var query = Session.Query<User>();
query = query.FilterList(x => x.Addresses, y => y.Street, new [] { "Foo*", "*Bar", "*test*" });
return query;
Which is shorter and cleaner but restricted.
This question already has answers here:
Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>
(24 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
How do I specify the argument passed to orderby using a value I take as a parameter?
Ex:
List<Student> existingStudends = new List<Student>{ new Student {...}, new Student {...}}
Currently implementation:
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderBy(c => c.Address).ToList();
Instead of c.Address, how can I take that as a parameter?
Example
string param = "City";
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderByDescending(c => param).ToList();
You can use a little bit of reflection to construct the expression tree as follows (this is an extension method):
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty,
bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
orderByProperty is the Property name you want to order by and if pass true as parameter for desc, will sort in descending order; otherwise, will sort in ascending order.
Now you should be able to do existingStudents.OrderBy("City",true); or existingStudents.OrderBy("City",false);
Here's a possiblity using reflection...
var param = "Address";
var propertyInfo = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null));
To expand on the answer by #Icarus: if you want the return type of the extension method to be an IOrderedQueryable instead of an IQueryable, you can simply cast the result as follows:
public static IOrderedQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return (IOrderedQueryable<TEntity>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
1) Install System.Linq.Dynamic
2) Add the following code
public static class OrderUtils
{
public static string ToStringForOrdering<T, TKey>(this Expression<Func<T, TKey>> expression, bool isDesc = false)
{
var str = expression.Body.ToString();
var param = expression.Parameters.First().Name;
str = str.Replace("Convert(", "(").Replace(param + ".", "");
return str + (isDesc ? " descending" : "");
}
}
3) Write your switch for selecting of Lambda function
public static class SortHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<UserApp, object>> UserApp(string orderProperty)
{
orderProperty = orderProperty?.ToLowerInvariant();
switch (orderProperty)
{
case "firstname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName;
case "lastname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "fullname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName + x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "email":
return x => x.Email;
}
}
}
4) Use your helpers
Dbset.OrderBy(SortHelper.UserApp("firstname").ToStringForOrdering())
5) You can use it with pagging (PagedList)
public virtual IPagedList<T> GetPage<TOrder>(Page page, Expression<Func<T, bool>> where, Expression<Func<T, TOrder>> order, bool isDesc = false,
params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes)
{
var orderedQueryable = Dbset.OrderBy(order.ToStringForOrdering(isDesc));
var query = orderedQueryable.Where(where).GetPage(page);
query = AppendIncludes(query, includes);
var results = query.ToList();
var total = Dbset.Count(where);
return new StaticPagedList<T>(results, page.PageNumber, page.PageSize, total);
}
Explanation
System.Linq.Dynamic allows us to set string value in OrderBy method. But inside this extension the string will be parsed to Lambda. So I thought it would work if we will parse Lambda to string and give it to OrderBy method. And it works!
Here's something I came up with for dealing with a conditional Descending. You could combine this with other methods of generating the keySelector func dynamically.
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource, TKey>(this IQueryable<TSource> source,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection sortOrder
)
{
if (sortOrder == System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending)
return source.OrderBy(keySelector);
else
return source.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
Usage:
//imagine this is some parameter
var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = query.OrderBy(ec => ec.MyColumnName, direction);
Notice this allows you to chain this .OrderBy extension with a new parameter onto any IQueryable.
// perhaps passed in as a request of user to change sort order
// var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = context.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Paid)
.OrderBy(ec => ec.OrderPaidUtc, direction);
private Func<T, object> GetOrderByExpression<T>(string sortColumn)
{
Func<T, object> orderByExpr = null;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortColumn))
{
Type sponsorResultType = typeof(T);
if (sponsorResultType.GetProperties().Any(prop => prop.Name == sortColumn))
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pinfo = sponsorResultType.GetProperty(sortColumn);
orderByExpr = (data => pinfo.GetValue(data, null));
}
}
return orderByExpr;
}
public List<T> OrderByDir<T>(IEnumerable<T> source, string dir, Func<T, object> OrderByColumn)
{
return dir.ToUpper() == "ASC" ? source.OrderBy(OrderByColumn).ToList() : source.OrderByDescending(OrderByColumn).ToList();``
}
// Call the code like below
var orderByExpression= GetOrderByExpression<SearchResultsType>(sort);
var data = OrderByDir<SponsorSearchResults>(resultRecords, SortDirectionString, orderByExpression);
This doesn't let you pass a string, as you asked for in your question, but it might still work for you.
The OrderByDescending method takes a Func<TSource, TKey>, so you can rewrite your function this way:
List<Student> QueryStudents<TKey>(Func<Student, TKey> orderBy)
{
return existingStudents.OrderByDescending(orderBy).ToList();
}
There are other overloads for OrderByDescending as well that take a Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>>, and/or a IComparer<TKey>. You could also look into those and see if they provide you anything of use.
The only solution that worked for me was posted here https://gist.github.com/neoGeneva/1878868 by neoGeneva.
I will re-post his code because it works well and I wouldn't want it to be lost in the interwebs!
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortExpression)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("source", "source is null.");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
throw new ArgumentException("sortExpression is null or empty.", "sortExpression");
var parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
var isDescending = false;
var propertyName = "";
var tType = typeof(T);
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
propertyName = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
isDescending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = tType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (prop == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("No property '{0}' on type '{1}'", propertyName, tType.Name));
}
var funcType = typeof(Func<,>)
.MakeGenericType(tType, prop.PropertyType);
var lambdaBuilder = typeof(Expression)
.GetMethods()
.First(x => x.Name == "Lambda" && x.ContainsGenericParameters && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(funcType);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(tType);
var propExpress = Expression.Property(parameter, prop);
var sortLambda = lambdaBuilder
.Invoke(null, new object[] { propExpress, new ParameterExpression[] { parameter } });
var sorter = typeof(Queryable)
.GetMethods()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == (isDescending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy") && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { tType, prop.PropertyType });
return (IQueryable<T>)sorter
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, sortLambda });
}
return source;
}
Add the nugget package Dynamite to your code
Add the namespace Dynamite.Extensions
Eg : using Dynamite.Extensions;
Give Order by query like any SQL query
Eg : students.OrderBy(" City DESC, Address").ToList();
To extend the response of #Icarus: if you want to sort by two fields I could perform the following function (for one field the response of Icarius works very well).
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByDynamic<T>(this IQueryable<T> q, string SortField1, string SortField2, bool Ascending)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
var body = GetBodyExp(SortField1, SortField2, param);
var exp = Expression.Lambda(body, param);
string method = Ascending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Type[] types = new Type[] { q.ElementType, exp.Body.Type };
var mce = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), method, types, q.Expression, exp);
return q.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(mce);
}
This is the function that the body returns for the lambda expression, it works with string and int, but it is enough to add more types to make it work according to the need of each programmer
public static NewExpression GetBodyExp(string field1, string field2, ParameterExpression Parametro)
{
// SE OBTIENE LOS NOMBRES DE LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLE
string TypeName1 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field1).Type.Name;
string TypeName2 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field2).Type.Name;
// SE DECLARA EL TIPO ANONIMO SEGUN LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLES
Type TypeAnonymous = null;
if (TypeName1 == "String")
{
string var1 = "0";
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
int var2 = 0;
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
if (TypeName1 == "Int32")
{
int var1 = 0;
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
//se declaran los TIPOS NECESARIOS PARA GENERAR EL BODY DE LA EXPRESION LAMBDA
MemberExpression[] args = new[] { Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field1), Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field2) };
ConstructorInfo CInfo = TypeAnonymous.GetConstructors()[0];
IEnumerable<MemberInfo> a = TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property);
//BODY
NewExpression body = Expression.New(CInfo, args, TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property));
return body;
}
to use it the following is done
IQueryable<MyClass> IqMyClass= context.MyClass.AsQueryable();
List<MyClass> ListMyClass= IqMyClass.OrderByDynamic("UserName", "IdMyClass", true).ToList();
if there is a better way to do this, it would be great if they share it
I managed to solve it thanks to: How can I make a Multiple property lambda expression with Linq
New Answer : this is a more complete answer that supports multiple columns for order by like SQL. Example : .OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC") :
namespace Utility;
public static class QueryExtension
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc, bool isThenBy = false)
{
string command = isThenBy ? (desc ? "ThenByDescending" : "ThenBy") : (desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy");
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string sqlOrderByList)
{
var ordebyItems = sqlOrderByList.Trim().Split(',');
IQueryable<TEntity> result = source;
bool useThenBy = false;
foreach (var item in ordebyItems)
{
var splt = item.Trim().Split(' ');
result = result.OrderBy(splt[0].Trim(), (splt.Length > 1 && splt[1].Trim().ToLower() == "desc"), useThenBy);
if (useThenBy)
useThenBy = true;
}
return result;
}
}
The second function iterates over orderby columns and uses the first one.
Use it like this :
using Utility;
...
public void MyMethod()
{
var query = _dbContext.Person.AsQueryable();
query.OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC");
}
I'm way late to the party but none of these solutions worked for me. I was eager to try System.Linq.Dynamic, but I couldn't find that on Nuget, maybe depreciated? Either way...
Here is a solutions I came up with. I needed to dynamically use a mixture of OrderBy, OrderByDescending and OrderBy > ThenBy.
I simply created an extension method for my list object, a bit hacky I know... I wouldn't recommend this if it were something I was doing a lot of, but it's good for a one off.
List<Employee> Employees = GetAllEmployees();
foreach(Employee oEmployee in Employees.ApplyDynamicSort(eEmployeeSort))
{
//do stuff
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<Employee> ApplyDynamicSort(this List<Employee> lEmployees, Enums.EmployeeSort eEmployeeSort)
{
switch (eEmployeeSort)
{
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_ASC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderByDescending(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Department_ASC_Salary_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Department).ThenByDescending(y => y.Salary);
default:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
}
}
This question already has answers here:
Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>
(24 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
How do I specify the argument passed to orderby using a value I take as a parameter?
Ex:
List<Student> existingStudends = new List<Student>{ new Student {...}, new Student {...}}
Currently implementation:
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderBy(c => c.Address).ToList();
Instead of c.Address, how can I take that as a parameter?
Example
string param = "City";
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderByDescending(c => param).ToList();
You can use a little bit of reflection to construct the expression tree as follows (this is an extension method):
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty,
bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
orderByProperty is the Property name you want to order by and if pass true as parameter for desc, will sort in descending order; otherwise, will sort in ascending order.
Now you should be able to do existingStudents.OrderBy("City",true); or existingStudents.OrderBy("City",false);
Here's a possiblity using reflection...
var param = "Address";
var propertyInfo = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null));
To expand on the answer by #Icarus: if you want the return type of the extension method to be an IOrderedQueryable instead of an IQueryable, you can simply cast the result as follows:
public static IOrderedQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return (IOrderedQueryable<TEntity>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
1) Install System.Linq.Dynamic
2) Add the following code
public static class OrderUtils
{
public static string ToStringForOrdering<T, TKey>(this Expression<Func<T, TKey>> expression, bool isDesc = false)
{
var str = expression.Body.ToString();
var param = expression.Parameters.First().Name;
str = str.Replace("Convert(", "(").Replace(param + ".", "");
return str + (isDesc ? " descending" : "");
}
}
3) Write your switch for selecting of Lambda function
public static class SortHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<UserApp, object>> UserApp(string orderProperty)
{
orderProperty = orderProperty?.ToLowerInvariant();
switch (orderProperty)
{
case "firstname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName;
case "lastname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "fullname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName + x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "email":
return x => x.Email;
}
}
}
4) Use your helpers
Dbset.OrderBy(SortHelper.UserApp("firstname").ToStringForOrdering())
5) You can use it with pagging (PagedList)
public virtual IPagedList<T> GetPage<TOrder>(Page page, Expression<Func<T, bool>> where, Expression<Func<T, TOrder>> order, bool isDesc = false,
params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes)
{
var orderedQueryable = Dbset.OrderBy(order.ToStringForOrdering(isDesc));
var query = orderedQueryable.Where(where).GetPage(page);
query = AppendIncludes(query, includes);
var results = query.ToList();
var total = Dbset.Count(where);
return new StaticPagedList<T>(results, page.PageNumber, page.PageSize, total);
}
Explanation
System.Linq.Dynamic allows us to set string value in OrderBy method. But inside this extension the string will be parsed to Lambda. So I thought it would work if we will parse Lambda to string and give it to OrderBy method. And it works!
Here's something I came up with for dealing with a conditional Descending. You could combine this with other methods of generating the keySelector func dynamically.
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource, TKey>(this IQueryable<TSource> source,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection sortOrder
)
{
if (sortOrder == System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending)
return source.OrderBy(keySelector);
else
return source.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
Usage:
//imagine this is some parameter
var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = query.OrderBy(ec => ec.MyColumnName, direction);
Notice this allows you to chain this .OrderBy extension with a new parameter onto any IQueryable.
// perhaps passed in as a request of user to change sort order
// var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = context.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Paid)
.OrderBy(ec => ec.OrderPaidUtc, direction);
private Func<T, object> GetOrderByExpression<T>(string sortColumn)
{
Func<T, object> orderByExpr = null;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortColumn))
{
Type sponsorResultType = typeof(T);
if (sponsorResultType.GetProperties().Any(prop => prop.Name == sortColumn))
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pinfo = sponsorResultType.GetProperty(sortColumn);
orderByExpr = (data => pinfo.GetValue(data, null));
}
}
return orderByExpr;
}
public List<T> OrderByDir<T>(IEnumerable<T> source, string dir, Func<T, object> OrderByColumn)
{
return dir.ToUpper() == "ASC" ? source.OrderBy(OrderByColumn).ToList() : source.OrderByDescending(OrderByColumn).ToList();``
}
// Call the code like below
var orderByExpression= GetOrderByExpression<SearchResultsType>(sort);
var data = OrderByDir<SponsorSearchResults>(resultRecords, SortDirectionString, orderByExpression);
This doesn't let you pass a string, as you asked for in your question, but it might still work for you.
The OrderByDescending method takes a Func<TSource, TKey>, so you can rewrite your function this way:
List<Student> QueryStudents<TKey>(Func<Student, TKey> orderBy)
{
return existingStudents.OrderByDescending(orderBy).ToList();
}
There are other overloads for OrderByDescending as well that take a Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>>, and/or a IComparer<TKey>. You could also look into those and see if they provide you anything of use.
The only solution that worked for me was posted here https://gist.github.com/neoGeneva/1878868 by neoGeneva.
I will re-post his code because it works well and I wouldn't want it to be lost in the interwebs!
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortExpression)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("source", "source is null.");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
throw new ArgumentException("sortExpression is null or empty.", "sortExpression");
var parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
var isDescending = false;
var propertyName = "";
var tType = typeof(T);
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
propertyName = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
isDescending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = tType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (prop == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("No property '{0}' on type '{1}'", propertyName, tType.Name));
}
var funcType = typeof(Func<,>)
.MakeGenericType(tType, prop.PropertyType);
var lambdaBuilder = typeof(Expression)
.GetMethods()
.First(x => x.Name == "Lambda" && x.ContainsGenericParameters && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(funcType);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(tType);
var propExpress = Expression.Property(parameter, prop);
var sortLambda = lambdaBuilder
.Invoke(null, new object[] { propExpress, new ParameterExpression[] { parameter } });
var sorter = typeof(Queryable)
.GetMethods()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == (isDescending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy") && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { tType, prop.PropertyType });
return (IQueryable<T>)sorter
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, sortLambda });
}
return source;
}
Add the nugget package Dynamite to your code
Add the namespace Dynamite.Extensions
Eg : using Dynamite.Extensions;
Give Order by query like any SQL query
Eg : students.OrderBy(" City DESC, Address").ToList();
To extend the response of #Icarus: if you want to sort by two fields I could perform the following function (for one field the response of Icarius works very well).
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByDynamic<T>(this IQueryable<T> q, string SortField1, string SortField2, bool Ascending)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
var body = GetBodyExp(SortField1, SortField2, param);
var exp = Expression.Lambda(body, param);
string method = Ascending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Type[] types = new Type[] { q.ElementType, exp.Body.Type };
var mce = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), method, types, q.Expression, exp);
return q.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(mce);
}
This is the function that the body returns for the lambda expression, it works with string and int, but it is enough to add more types to make it work according to the need of each programmer
public static NewExpression GetBodyExp(string field1, string field2, ParameterExpression Parametro)
{
// SE OBTIENE LOS NOMBRES DE LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLE
string TypeName1 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field1).Type.Name;
string TypeName2 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field2).Type.Name;
// SE DECLARA EL TIPO ANONIMO SEGUN LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLES
Type TypeAnonymous = null;
if (TypeName1 == "String")
{
string var1 = "0";
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
int var2 = 0;
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
if (TypeName1 == "Int32")
{
int var1 = 0;
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
//se declaran los TIPOS NECESARIOS PARA GENERAR EL BODY DE LA EXPRESION LAMBDA
MemberExpression[] args = new[] { Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field1), Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field2) };
ConstructorInfo CInfo = TypeAnonymous.GetConstructors()[0];
IEnumerable<MemberInfo> a = TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property);
//BODY
NewExpression body = Expression.New(CInfo, args, TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property));
return body;
}
to use it the following is done
IQueryable<MyClass> IqMyClass= context.MyClass.AsQueryable();
List<MyClass> ListMyClass= IqMyClass.OrderByDynamic("UserName", "IdMyClass", true).ToList();
if there is a better way to do this, it would be great if they share it
I managed to solve it thanks to: How can I make a Multiple property lambda expression with Linq
New Answer : this is a more complete answer that supports multiple columns for order by like SQL. Example : .OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC") :
namespace Utility;
public static class QueryExtension
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc, bool isThenBy = false)
{
string command = isThenBy ? (desc ? "ThenByDescending" : "ThenBy") : (desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy");
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string sqlOrderByList)
{
var ordebyItems = sqlOrderByList.Trim().Split(',');
IQueryable<TEntity> result = source;
bool useThenBy = false;
foreach (var item in ordebyItems)
{
var splt = item.Trim().Split(' ');
result = result.OrderBy(splt[0].Trim(), (splt.Length > 1 && splt[1].Trim().ToLower() == "desc"), useThenBy);
if (useThenBy)
useThenBy = true;
}
return result;
}
}
The second function iterates over orderby columns and uses the first one.
Use it like this :
using Utility;
...
public void MyMethod()
{
var query = _dbContext.Person.AsQueryable();
query.OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC");
}
I'm way late to the party but none of these solutions worked for me. I was eager to try System.Linq.Dynamic, but I couldn't find that on Nuget, maybe depreciated? Either way...
Here is a solutions I came up with. I needed to dynamically use a mixture of OrderBy, OrderByDescending and OrderBy > ThenBy.
I simply created an extension method for my list object, a bit hacky I know... I wouldn't recommend this if it were something I was doing a lot of, but it's good for a one off.
List<Employee> Employees = GetAllEmployees();
foreach(Employee oEmployee in Employees.ApplyDynamicSort(eEmployeeSort))
{
//do stuff
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<Employee> ApplyDynamicSort(this List<Employee> lEmployees, Enums.EmployeeSort eEmployeeSort)
{
switch (eEmployeeSort)
{
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_ASC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderByDescending(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Department_ASC_Salary_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Department).ThenByDescending(y => y.Salary);
default:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
}
}
Is there any way to compare strings in a C# LINQ expression similar to SQL's LIKE operator?
Suppose I have a string list. On this list I want to search a string. In SQL, I could write:
SELECT * FROM DischargePort WHERE PortName LIKE '%BALTIMORE%'
Instead of the above, query want a linq syntax.
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
…
var regex = new Regex(sDischargePort, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
var sPortCode = Database.DischargePorts
.Where(p => regex.IsMatch(p.PortName))
.Single().PortCode;
My above LINQ syntax does not work. What have I got wrong?
Typically you use String.StartsWith/EndsWith/Contains. For example:
var portCode = Database.DischargePorts
.Where(p => p.PortName.Contains("BALTIMORE"))
.Single()
.PortCode;
I don't know if there's a way of doing proper regular expressions via LINQ to SQL though. (Note that it really does depend on which provider you're using - it would be fine in LINQ to Objects; it's a matter of whether the provider can convert the call into its native query format, e.g. SQL.)
EDIT: As BitKFu says, Single should be used when you expect exactly one result - when it's an error for that not to be the case. Options of SingleOrDefault, FirstOrDefault or First should be used depending on exactly what's expected.
Regex? no. But for that query you can just use:
string filter = "BALTIMORE";
(blah) .Where(row => row.PortName.Contains(filter)) (blah)
If you really want SQL LIKE, you can use System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlMethods.Like(...), which LINQ-to-SQL maps to LIKE in SQL Server.
Well... sometimes it may be uncomfortable to use Contains, StartsWith or EndsWith especially when searching value determine LIKE statment e.g. passed 'value%' require from developer to use StartsWith function in expression. So I decided to write extension for IQueryable objects.
Usage
// numbers: 11-000-00, 00-111-00, 00-000-11
var data1 = parts.Like(p => p.Number, "%11%");
// result: 11-000-00, 00-111-00, 00-000-11
var data2 = parts.Like(p => p.Number, "11%");
// result: 11-000-00
var data3 = parts.Like(p => p.Number, "%11");
// result: 00-000-11
Code
public static class LinqEx
{
private static readonly MethodInfo ContainsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains");
private static readonly MethodInfo StartsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static readonly MethodInfo EndsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("EndsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
public static Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> LikeExpression<TSource, TMember>(Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> property, string value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "t");
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo(property);
var member = Expression.Property(param, propertyInfo.Name);
var startWith = value.StartsWith("%");
var endsWith = value.EndsWith("%");
if (startWith)
value = value.Remove(0, 1);
if (endsWith)
value = value.Remove(value.Length - 1, 1);
var constant = Expression.Constant(value);
Expression exp;
if (endsWith && startWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, ContainsMethod, constant);
}
else if (startWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, EndsWithMethod, constant);
}
else if (endsWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, StartsWithMethod, constant);
}
else
{
exp = Expression.Equal(member, constant);
}
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(exp, param);
}
public static IQueryable<TSource> Like<TSource, TMember>(this IQueryable<TSource> source, Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> parameter, string value)
{
return source.Where(LikeExpression(parameter, value));
}
private static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo(Expression expression)
{
var lambda = expression as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("expression");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
switch (lambda.Body.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Convert:
memberExpr = ((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
break;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
break;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine property info from expression.");
var output = memberExpr.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (output == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine property info from expression.");
return output;
}
}
In native LINQ you may use combination of Contains/StartsWith/EndsWith or RegExp.
In LINQ2SQL use method SqlMethods.Like()
from i in db.myTable
where SqlMethods.Like(i.field, "tra%ata")
select i
add Assembly: System.Data.Linq (in System.Data.Linq.dll) to use this feature.
As Jon Skeet and Marc Gravell already mentioned, you can simple take a contains condition. But in case of your like query, it's very dangerous to take a Single() statement, because that implies that you only find 1 result. In case of more results, you'll receive a nice exception :)
So I would prefer using FirstOrDefault() instead of Single():
var first = Database.DischargePorts.FirstOrDefault(p => p.PortName.Contains("BALTIMORE"));
var portcode = first != null ? first.PortCode : string.Empty;
A simple as this
string[] users = new string[] {"Paul","Steve","Annick","Yannick"};
var result = from u in users where u.Contains("nn") select u;
Result -> Annick,Yannick
Ideally you should use StartWith or EndWith.
Here is an example:
DataContext dc = new DCGeneral();
List<Person> lstPerson= dc.GetTable<Person>().StartWith(c=> c.strNombre).ToList();
return lstPerson;
You can call the single method with a predicate:
var portCode = Database.DischargePorts
.Single(p => p.PortName.Contains("BALTIMORE"))
.PortCode;
You can also use the EF function tested in .net5
public async Task<IEnumerable<District>> SearchDistrict(string query, int stateId)
{
return await _dbContext
.Districts
.Include(s => s.State)
.Where(s => s.StateId == stateId && EF.Functions.Like(s.Name, "$%{query}%"))
.AsNoTracking()
.ToListAsync();
}
.Where(e => e.Value.StartsWith("BALTIMORE"))
This works like "LIKE" of SQL...
List<Categories> categoriess;
private void Buscar()
{
try
{
categoriess = Contexto.Categories.ToList();
categoriess = categoriess.Where(n => n.CategoryID >= Convert.ToInt32(txtCatID.Text) && n.CategoryID <= Convert.ToInt32(txtCatID1.Text) && (n.CategoryName.Contains(txtCatName.Text)) ).ToList();
Like Extension Linq / SQL
LikeExtension Class
Tested in .NET 5
public static class LikeExtension {
private static string ColumnDataBase<TEntity, TKey>(IModel model, Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate) where TEntity : class {
ITable table = model
.GetRelationalModel()
.Tables
.First(f => f
.EntityTypeMappings
.First()
.EntityType == model
.FindEntityType(predicate
.Parameters
.First()
.Type
));
string column = (predicate.Body as MemberExpression).Member.Name;
string columnDataBase = table.Columns.First(f => f.PropertyMappings.Count(f2 => f2.Property.Name == column) > 0).Name;
return columnDataBase;
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> Like<TEntity, TKey>(this DbContext context, Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text) where TEntity : class {
string columnDataBase = ColumnDataBase(context.Model, predicate);
return context.Set<TEntity>().FromSqlRaw(context.Set<TEntity>().ToQueryString() + " WHERE [" + columnDataBase + "] LIKE {0}", text);
}
public static async Task<IEnumerable<TEntity>> LikeAsync<TEntity, TKey>(this DbContext context, Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text, CancellationToken cancellationToken) where TEntity : class {
string columnDataBase = ColumnDataBase(context.Model, predicate);
return await context.Set<TEntity>().FromSqlRaw(context.Set<TEntity>().ToQueryString() + " WHERE [" + columnDataBase + "] LIKE {0}", text).ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
}
public static async Task<IEnumerable<TEntity>> LikeAsync<TEntity, TKey>(this IQueryable<TEntity> query, Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text, CancellationToken cancellationToken) where TEntity : class {
DbSet<TEntity> entities = query as DbSet<TEntity>;
string columnDataBase = ColumnDataBase(entities.EntityType.Model, predicate);
return await entities.FromSqlRaw(query.ToQueryString() + " WHERE [" + columnDataBase + "] LIKE {0}", text).ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> Like<TEntity, TKey>(this IQueryable<TEntity> query, Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text) where TEntity : class {
DbSet<TEntity> entities = query as DbSet<TEntity>;
string columnDataBase = ColumnDataBase(entities.EntityType.Model, predicate);
return entities.FromSqlRaw(query.ToQueryString() + " WHERE [" + columnDataBase + "] LIKE {0}", text);
}
}
Repository
public async Task<IEnumerable<TEntity>> LikeAsync<TKey>(Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text, CancellationToken cancellationToken) {
return await context.LikeAsync(predicate, text, cancellationToken);
}
public IQueryable<TEntity> Like<TKey>(Expression<Func<TEntity, TKey>> predicate, string text) {
return context.Like(predicate, text);
}
Use
IQueryable<CountryEntity> result = countryRepository
.Like(k => k.Name, "%Bra[sz]il%") /*Use Sync*/
.Where(w => w.DateRegister < DateTime.Now) /*Example*/
.Take(10); /*Example*/
Or
IEnumerable<CountryEntity> result = await countryRepository
.LikeAsync(k => k.Name, "%Bra[sz]il%", cancellationToken); /*Use Async*/
Or
IQueryable<CountryEntity> result = context.Countries
.Like(k => k.Name, "%Bra[sz]il%")
.Where(w => w.Name != null); /*Example*/
Or
List<CountryEntity> result2 = await context.Countries
.Like(k => k.Name, "%Bra[sz]il%")
.Where(w => w.Name != null) /*Example*/
.ToListAsync(); /*Use Async*/
Or
IEnumerable<CountryEntity> result3 = await context.Countries
.Where(w => w.Name != null)
.LikeAsync(k => k.Name, "%Bra[sz]il%", cancellationToken); /*Use Async*/
public static class StringEx
{
public static bool Contains(this String str, string[] Arr, StringComparison comp)
{
if (Arr != null)
{
foreach (string s in Arr)
{
if (str.IndexOf(s, comp)>=0)
{ return true; }
}
}
return false;
}
public static bool Contains(this String str,string[] Arr)
{
if (Arr != null)
{
foreach (string s in Arr)
{
if (str.Contains(s))
{ return true; }
}
}
return false;
}
}
var portCode = Database.DischargePorts
.Single(p => p.PortName.Contains( new string[] {"BALTIMORE"}, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase) ))
.PortCode;
Just add to string object extention methods.
public static class StringEx
{
public static bool Contains(this String str, string[] Arr, StringComparison comp)
{
if (Arr != null)
{
foreach (string s in Arr)
{
if (str.IndexOf(s, comp)>=0)
{ return true; }
}
}
return false;
}
public static bool Contains(this String str,string[] Arr)
{
if (Arr != null)
{
foreach (string s in Arr)
{
if (str.Contains(s))
{ return true; }
}
}
return false;
}
}
usage:
use namespase that contains this class;
var sPortCode = Database.DischargePorts
.Where(p => p.PortName.Contains(new string [] {"BALTIMORE"}, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase) )
.Single().PortCode;
#adobrzyc had this great custom LIKE function - I just wanted to share the IEnumerable version of it.
public static class LinqEx
{
private static readonly MethodInfo ContainsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains");
private static readonly MethodInfo StartsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static readonly MethodInfo EndsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("EndsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static Func<TSource, bool> LikeExpression<TSource, TMember>(Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> property, string value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "t");
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo(property);
var member = Expression.Property(param, propertyInfo.Name);
var startWith = value.StartsWith("%");
var endsWith = value.EndsWith("%");
if (startWith)
value = value.Remove(0, 1);
if (endsWith)
value = value.Remove(value.Length - 1, 1);
var constant = Expression.Constant(value);
Expression exp;
if (endsWith && startWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, ContainsMethod, constant);
}
else if (startWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, EndsWithMethod, constant);
}
else if (endsWith)
{
exp = Expression.Call(member, StartsWithMethod, constant);
}
else
{
exp = Expression.Equal(member, constant);
}
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(exp, param).Compile();
}
public static IEnumerable<TSource> Like<TSource, TMember>(this IEnumerable<TSource> source, Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> parameter, string value)
{
return source.Where(LikeExpression(parameter, value));
}
private static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo(Expression expression)
{
var lambda = expression as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("expression");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
switch (lambda.Body.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Convert:
memberExpr = ((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
break;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
break;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine property info from expression.");
var output = memberExpr.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (output == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine property info from expression.");
return output;
}
}
Great custom LIKE function by #adobrzycdon't work for me in LINQPad.
Here version which work in LINQPad (tested on LINQPad 5 and LINQPad 6)
Code
void Main()
{
var users = from au in ApplicationUsers
select au;
users.Like(u => u.UserName, "Ada Byron").Dump();
users.Like(u => u.UserName, "%yro%").Dump();
users.Like(u => u.UserName, "% Byron").Dump();
users.Like(u => u.UserName, "Ada %").Dump();
users.Like(u => u.UserName, "%yro%").Like(u => u.UserName, "Ada %").Dump();
// => SQL =>
// DECLARE #p0 NVarChar(1000) = 'Ada %'
// DECLARE #p1 NVarChar(1000) = '%yro%'
// SELECT [t0].[UserName], ...
// FROM [ApplicationUsers] AS [t0]
// WHERE ([t0].[UserName] LIKE #p0) AND ([t0].[UserName] LIKE #p1)
}
// based on LinqEx by adobrzyc (https://stackoverflow.com/a/35636138/1351740)
public static class LinqExFork
{
private static readonly MethodInfo ContainsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static readonly MethodInfo StartsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static readonly MethodInfo EndsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("EndsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
public static Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> LikeExpression<TSource, TMember>(Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> property, string value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "t");
var memberInfo = GetMemberInfo(property);
MemberExpression member;
if (memberInfo is PropertyInfo)
member = Expression.Property(param, memberInfo.Name);
else if (memberInfo is FieldInfo)
member = Expression.Field(param, memberInfo.Name);
else
throw new InvalidOperationException("Unable to determine propery or field info from expression.");
var startWith = value.StartsWith("%");
if (startWith)
value = value.Remove(0, 1);
var endsWith = value.EndsWith("%");
if (endsWith)
value = value.Remove(value.Length - 1, 1);
var constant = Expression.Constant(value);
Expression exp;
if (endsWith && startWith)
exp = Expression.Call(member, ContainsMethod, constant);
else if (startWith)
exp = Expression.Call(member, EndsWithMethod, constant);
else if (endsWith)
exp = Expression.Call(member, StartsWithMethod, constant);
else
exp = Expression.Equal(member, constant);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(exp, param);
}
public static IQueryable<TSource> Like<TSource, TMember>(this IQueryable<TSource> source, Expression<Func<TSource, TMember>> parameter, string value)
{
return source.Where(LikeExpression(parameter, value));
}
private static MemberInfo GetMemberInfo(Expression expression)
{
var lambda = expression as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("expression");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
switch (lambda.Body.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Convert:
memberExpr = ((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
break;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
break;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine member info from expression.");
var output = memberExpr.Member as MemberInfo;
if (output == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Specified expression is invalid. Unable to determine member info from expression.");
return output;
}
}