So far, in my applications, I stored all my data via serialization, so I never really needed anything else. But now I am working with more complicated data and I need more than a simple file to store them. Is there some inbuilt storage engine in Windows I can use, which will allow me to pull and edit data with SQL queries? (Since I doubt the user will be willing to install and configure standalone MySQL server just for my application and I don't really want to use 3rd party solutions)
And if there is, how can I access such database engine?
Yes, Windows does have an embedded database engine, which has been there since Windows 2000. It is called Esent.
There is a project called Managed Esent to expose the features of Esent to managed code. There is a NuGet package for it.
I do not know whether it fits your exact need of updates via SQL queries but it does boast a number of features:
ACID transactions with savepoints, lazy commits, and robust crash recovery.
Snapshot isolation.
Highly concurrent database access.
Flexible meta-data (tens of thousands of columns, tables, and indexes are possible).
Indexing support for integer, floating point, ASCII, Unicode, and binary columns.
Update
I have since had some experience with Esent in C# via the nuget package. It does NOT have SQL query capabilities. There is support for indices and basic cursors over them but nothing like the power of SQL. My suggestion if you need a light-weight SQL is definitely SQLite.
SQLite is a software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine.
http://www.sqlite.org
SQLite will work without requiring your App User to install SQLExpress or any other database engine, making it a good option for desktop applications.
Use SQLite as standalone database and integrated part of your applications.
Main benefits:
data is stored inside a single file, easy to pull/edit
ships as part of your application as dll, no separate
installation/configuration needed
i found some info about the database on the Microsoft website database info
there is a embedded database engine. Esent
If it is small set of user specific data, storing at windows registry is a good option.
No, there is no inbuilt database available.
But there are good alternatives, like the mqsql express server or a SQLITE database, which is basically a single database file which is accessed through a library in your project. So if you use SQLITE, you do not need to instal anything.
Related
I am developing a windows application for agricultural purpose. This application will be used by multiple users to maintain the data. The main issue is there won't be network connectivity on the work location. But however by end of the day they can go and synchronize if there are any option.
I just want to know how can we import and store all the data locally and update the data to database when there is network.
The options that i thought is to have SQL on every machine that runs this application. Store the data to local database when there is no network.
Having a separate button to export the local data to the centralized database when there is network.
Looks like this is complicated. Is there any better and easier option.
I prefer using c#, Visual studio.
Thanks.
You can use SQLite for storing data locally. It's fast, lightweight, and public domain.
You can use whatever the database of choice for the centralized server.
Well, this a quite broad question, as it has many options and scenarios. The questions you should ask yourself are:
Does user handle new information only or any information from any other user from the previous syncing?
Do you have to handle update conflicts?
Do you handle text information only or you have complex types and binary files?
As for the solution, the easiest way, from my point of view, would be using SQL Lite on portable devices, is a lightweight SQL client that will allow you to handle information easily. On the server you can use whatever you want, SQL Server, MySQL or any other SQL flavor you may like. Just make sure there is a connector for your portable device OS.
If you keep thinking of using SQL server on the portable device, it's a battery hogger!!!, you might want to check Microsoft Sync framework, as it provides almost all possible scenarios for handling data syncing, manage conflicts, etc.
Thanks for the answers. Please find the below solution that we implemented.
1) Installed SQL express on all the local machines
2) Used Microsoft Sync framework to sync the data. The sync is configured on demand.
Issues faced:
1) We were using geometry datatype on few tables and this was not supported by sync framework.
2) Any change in the database schema will not reflect on the client machine. We will have to delete all the system generated procedures used to track the table change and regenerate it. I am sure there will be a much better way to do this.
Cheers,
Jebli
I am current building (in C#) a fairly basic point-of-sale program for a local community in Uganda to use in tracking business at their sunflower seed press. I was thinking that I would need some sort of database (like a SQL database), but I've never set up a database before, so I'm wondering what the best way to do this is. Maybe a database isn't the best way. The program will not have internet access, so everything will have to be done locally on the machine.
I think your first step should be designing out what data you need to store. Build an Entity Relationship Model and decide what your domain model is going to be. There are many different Database Engines out there that you can use that have different features, installation requirements, etc. A database engine can be installed locally, or on a remote machine to connect to. If you're writing a C# app, you'll probably want to use the System.Data namespace. You can use plain ADO .NET, or use something like Linq To Enttiies to help create proxy classes for your data tables.
You can access a SQL database using the same API for queries / record extraction regardless of the DB Engine uses. In some caess, you may need to use a seperate library that provides an implementation (or a better one), as in the case of an Oracle Database and the Oracle Data Access Components. Right out of the gate, .NET works very well with Microsoft SQL Server, but other options would work.
The details of what database engine are not as important as defining a good set of data tables to represent your data.
Yes. If it has lots of data you have to consider using database. Whether you have internet or not, as long as you have local network, you can easily do database.
Set up a database server ( maybe sql)
Do your database and install it on the database server
Do your application and connect to your database through connection string.
You are on the right track to use a database to store data. It is pretty easy to accomplish. Your computer does not need to be connected to the internet.
SQL Server Express Edition is free with a limit of 10 gigs of data. This will probably be much, much more space than you will need.
From C#, use ADO.NET. It is very simple if you know some SQL. Code samples here.
I'm building a C#/WPF job search tracking application to keep track of resumes submitted, interviews, followups, etc and am not sure of the best way to store the data. Where/how would YOU store the data? My first thought was XML to keep it simple, but it seems like I should "model" my data since there will be lots of related bits of information. Would SQLite be a better choice? Other recommendations?
Since I assume you want to query and update that data I would even suggest an ORM like Entity Framework - it's easy to get started and the basic stuff like querying and updating will be very straightforward if you have worked with LINQ before - saves you the hassle of writing your own SQL queries. This also will allow you to easily extend your model later on should you decide to do so.
Edit:
There are self-contained light-weight alternatives that would still allow you to use LINQ:
SQL Server Compact:
Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a free
SQL Server embedded database ideal for
building standalone and occasionally
connected applications for mobile
devices, desktops, and Web clients.
Here' an article that describes how to get LINQ to SQL to work on it. Apparently you can also use LINQ to Entities on it but there's quirks (such as design-time support) that you'll have to work around.
SQLLite:
SQLite is a software library that
implements a self-contained,
serverless, zero-configuration,
transactional SQL database engine.
SQLite is the most widely deployed SQL
database engine in the world.
There's a LINQ provider for it called DBLinq
As #Robert Harvey pointed out in his answer there's (almost) full support for EF since there's an ADO.NET provider for SQLLite:
Support for the ADO.NET 3.5 Entity
Framework
Supports nearly all the
entity framework functionality that
Sql Server supports, and passes 99% of
the tests in MS's EFQuerySamples demo
application.
Generally, you want to store the data from your application in a database. For WPF and C#, that database is usually SQL Server or SQL Server Express, because Visual Studio 2008 easily integrates with those.
Do not use XML for this. XML is not intended to be a large scale storage medium; the purpose of XML is to provide a common language for different computer systems to talk to each other.
SQL Server Express is usable on any Windows PC; you just need to deploy the redistributable, using a named instance. See also http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd981032(SQL.100).aspx. If it's a small application and you want to go simpler, you can use SQL Server Compact Edition, or SQLite with the ADO.NET provider.
Complete newbie question here: I'm just playing with C# for the first time and want to make a Windows Forms application which stores some info in a database structure, but obviously don't want to require something like MySQL to be installed on each client's computer. How do I go about this?
You can use SQLite. It doesn't require any installation or server on the client's computers. Here is an blog describing how to use it with .NET. It is easy to use, just add a reference to the System.Data.SQLite.dll.
Here is an open source data provider for .NET: System.Data.SQLite
From homepage: "SQLite is a software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine. SQLite is the most widely deployed SQL database engine in the world. The source code for SQLite is in the public domain."
You use a database that doesn't require an install. There are a few out there - there's Microsoft SQL Server Compact, which frankly is badly named, as it won't support the more useful SQL functions like stored procedures, views and so on. There's also VistaDB which does support stored procs, but requires purchase if you want Visual Studio plugins.
The answer is Embedded Databases. You've got quite a large list of Embedded databases that you can use:
Commercial:
VistaDB - This database is written completely in managed C#.
Open Source:
Firebird - .NET Driver
SQLite - .NET Driver
You could write your data to XML files, or you could take a look at the Sql Server Compact Edition.
You could also work with objects and serialize/deserialize these to disk as binaries.
Of course the type of storage you choose depends a lot on the kind of data you're storing (and the volume of it).
Use SQL Server CE
An easy way to do it from .NET 3.5 onwards is to store your data in XML files and use Linq to XML. This allows you to use SQL-like commands on your data which are actually compiled into your application, so you get full IDE IntelliSense support and error checking.
Perhaps you could serialise a dataset and save it as XML. I'm a little confused why if you're playing around you would need to install MySQL on all client's computers. You could look at using SQL Express which is free perhaps?
Serialise Dataset:
http://blogs.msdn.com/yosit/archive/2003/07/10/9921.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163911.aspx
The Easiest way will be SQL Server Compact, Because it integrates directly into the Visual Studio IDE (I'm just hazarding the guess here that you use VS). Add the "Local Database", Create your tables and be sure to make your Table Adapter with Select, Update, Insert and Delete methods. If during Database Creation you called your Dataset "DS" you will be able to instantiate a Table Adapter Object from
DSTableAdapters
Namespace, and Use GetData() or Fill() methods to retrieve your Data, and Insert(), Update() and Delete() to Manage it.
VelocityDB works in a server less mode but can also be combined with a server when there is a need for it. It outperforms all the other choices mentioned here by roughly a magnitude, see comparison here. It allows you to use almost any .NET data structures persistently. The entire database engine and the optional server is implemented using C# code.
I'm in the early stages of a project, and it's not clear yet whether we'll need a "real" database (i.e. SQL Server et al). So I've been doing some prototyping using MS-Access, which is working fine so far. (developing in C#/VS2008/.Net 3.5/MS-Access 2000).
However, the object-relational impedance mismatch is already becoming annoying, and will only get worse as the project evolves.
I have not been able to find an ORM that will work with MS-Access. Any suggestions?
Edit - Follow Up
We ended up using Fluent NHibernate, mainly because it Automaps our object model to a relational database, which has been a huge win for us. Most of the FNH code samples we found used SQLite, and this worked so well that we intend to use it for our production database. (The app is a desktop scientific data collection and analysis package).
MSAccess files can be set up as an ODBC source on Windows machines. Almost any ORM will allow you to use ODBC. Here is a quick tutorial on how to set that up, it's outlined for Win2k but the process is the same for XP+. You also need to have MDAC installed on your box.
NHibernate seems to have native support of MSAccess as well, see here. I've never used it though. It also has an ODBC driver.. Many others support ODBC as well.
And again, as others are saying.. MSAccess does not scale... period. Installing a real database server is fairly easy, so I'd recommend SQL Server Express as others have, or even MySQL or Postgre, whatever is easier to set up.
If this is an application that you intend to deploy to clients, with each client having their own unique database, I would recommend another solution entirely, SQLite. SQLite gives you database power on an app by app basis. If you have a central database server, one of the previously mentioned solutions would be best.
There's only one scenario when choosing the Access Database Engine is a good choice: when building a self-contained Access application using Access Forms (though choosing to use Access in the first place is a questionable choice ;)
The database engine that VS2008 plays nicest with is SQL Server and you will have no problem finding an ORM that plays nice with SQL Server.
Can't give you an answer to your question, but instead of Access you might want to consider one of the following options:
SQL Server Express: is free and compatible with the full SQL Server
SQL Server Compact: also free, does not require any deployment/installation, does not support all features (e.g. no stored procedures).
At this stage, if you are unsure whether you need a "real" database or not, I'd skip MS Access and go straight to sql server express. It's free and still allows you to do everything you need to.
Plus, if you later decide you need to scale up, then you can without any pain.
I recommend you to use something like Microsoft SQL Server or PostgreSQL for prototyping. If you don't want to learn specific SQL syntax and install special tools for designing database schema, you can use ORM that automatically generates database schema from your persistent classes declaration. Anyway this approach is very effective for prototyping.
LLBLGen works with Access
Access is just a bad, bad idea. I believe MS only includes Access in Office to keep legacy users happy.
Even if you find an ORM that will work with an Access database, with few exceptions you're locking yourself into a niche tool that likely will not work out-of-the box with a real database engine. If you decide to switch to a real database engine later on, you'll not only have to deal with migrating the database, but switching to a different ORM.
See this comparison between SQL Server Express and SQL Server Compact. The comparison document also mentions some problems with other data stores, including Access.
If you are REALLY concerned about being able to install SQL Server Express, consider SQL Server Compact:
it can be linked into your redistributable app. No need to install a service (which may require admin rights during install of your application); everything is taken care of when you install your app. This makes the most sense if you need the data to reside on the user's machine instead of a server, and is most analogous to using Access.
It's less powerful than Express (doesn't support views, triggers, stored procedures, which I consider a requirement)
Can be scaled up to Express or other SQL Server versions very easily
Suitable for small-footprint installs like tablets, mobile devices, etc.
Always keep scalability in mind when designing any application. You don't want to wind up having to write a PHP->C++ compiler if/when your app becomes successful just because you picked the wrong tool up front.
While we're at it:
The big issue with Access (or, in this case, the Jet engine, which is the part you'd really be using when integrating an Access database with a .NET app) is that there is no "server" that handles datase requests. The engine, hosted in your app, must read and write directly to a file on disk that contains the database. Whenever this happens, the file must be locked to prevent concurrent writes. Dirty reads become more common as the number of users grows, as does the potential for database corruption.
Imagine having every customer at a large restaurant trying to simultaneously enter the kitchen to write down their orders or retrieve their food. Chaos would result. There'd be a lot of broken dishes, the kitchen would be a mess, you'd be lucky to get what you ordered in any sort of edible condition. With one customer, this probably works fine. With 5, eh, maybe. With 20,50,1000? Not so much.
So, the restaurant industry introduced waiters and managers that buffer IO to the kitchen. The database server application does something roughly analogous to this by restricting access to the files on disk. Everyone gets what they want, faster and in a much more reliable way, and the data store is protected.