I have an array of days (mon, tue, etc..) that I might not want to show, so when I create a list of days, if they are already in the "hiddendays", it doesn't add them.
// This would return for example 1, 2
var hDays = account.ScheduleHiddenDays.Split(',').Select(int.Parse).ToList();
var daySunday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 0,
Name = "Sunday"
};
var dayMonday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 1,
Name = "Monday"
};
var dayTuesday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 2,
Name = "Tueday"
};
var dayWednesday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 3,
Name = "Wednesday"
};
var dayThursday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 4,
Name = "Thursday"
};
var dayFriday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 5,
Name = "Friday"
};
var daySaturday = new ViewModels.Day()
{
Id = 6,
Name = "Saturday"
};
// This is where I need to check if they exist in hDays, it doesn't add them to this list. But how?
model.ScheduleHiddenDays = new List<ViewModels.Day>()
{
daySunday,
dayMonday,
dayTuesday,
dayWednesday,
dayThursday,
dayFriday,
daySaturday
};
Something along the lines of this:
var days = new List<ViewModels.Day>()
{
daySunday,
dayMonday,
dayTuesday,
dayWednesday,
dayThursday,
dayFriday,
daySaturday
};
model.ScheduleHiddenDays = days.Where(x => !hDays.Contains(x.Id)).ToList();
Related
I try add subscription method to my project where customer can subscription product from other user. But i have problem because when i use it:
LineItems = new List<SessionLineItemOptions>
{
new SessionLineItemOptions
{
Price = "{{PRICE_ID}}",
Quantity = 1,
},
},
Mode = "subscription",
SuccessUrl = "https://example.com/success",
CancelUrl = "https://example.com/cancel",
PaymentIntentData = new SessionPaymentIntentDataOptions
{
ApplicationFeeAmount = 123,
},
};
var requestOptions = new RequestOptions
{
StripeAccount = "{{CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_ID}}",
};
var service = new SessionService();
Session session = service.Create(options, requestOptions);
But I have error „You can not pass payment_intent_data in subscription mode".
Can i add application fee amount with linked account to subscription? Is payment usually the only option?
PS. I create my product like this:
var options = new ProductCreateOptions
{
Name = "new product",
DefaultPriceData = new ProductDefaultPriceDataOptions
{
UnitAmount = price,
Currency = "pln"
},
Expand = new List<string> { "default_price" }
};
var requestOptions = new RequestOptions
{
StripeAccount = stripeAccountId,
};
_productService.Create(options, requestOptions);
You'd use https://stripe.com/docs/api/checkout/sessions/create#create_checkout_session-subscription_data-application_fee_percent instead.
var options = new Stripe.Checkout.SessionCreateOptions
{
...
SubscriptionData = new Stripe.Checkout.SessionSubscriptionDataOptions
{
ApplicationFeePercent = 10
},
};
...
I am trying to generate a list result through linq.
I would like to have a result as a list with unique folder id with 0th item as folder_name, 1st Item as a list with one or more projects having fields project_id,name and description.
I have written following query:
Folders is basically model with format as folderid, name, List projects where Project Model has project_id, name and description
from the following records:
Models
public class FolderModel
{
public int folder_id { get; set; }
public string folder_name { get; set; }
public List<ProjectModel> projects{ get; set; }
}
public class ProjectModel
{
public int project_id { get; set; }
public string project_name { get; set; }
public string project_description { get; set; }
}
public class ResultModel
{
public List<FolderModel> folders { get; set; }
}
Result Data
List<FolderModel, List<ProjectModel>> result = new List<FolderModel, List<ProjectModel>>();
List<ProjectModel> projectList1 = new List<>();
ProjectModel projectModel1 = new ProjectModel();
projectModel1.project_name = "F1P1";
projectModel1.project_description = "F1P1";
projectList1.add(projectModel1);
List<ProjectModel> projectList2 = new List<>();
ProjectModel projectModel21 = new ProjectModel();
projectModel21.project_name = "F2P1";
projectModel21.project_description = "F2P1";
projectList2.add(projectModel21);
ProjectModel projectModel22 = new ProjectModel();
projectModel22.project_name = "F2P2";
projectModel22.project_description = "F2P2";
projectList2.add(projectModel22);
List<ProjectModel> projectList3 = new List<>();
ProjectModel projectModel3 = new ProjectModel();
projectModel3.project_name = "F3P1";
projectModel3.project_description = "F1P3";
projectList3.add(projectModel3);
ResultModel resultModel = new resultModel();
resultModel.(new FolderModel { folder_id: 1,folder-name: "F1" }, projectList1);
FolderModel folderModel1 = new FolderModel();
folderModel1.folder_id = 1
folderModel1.folder_name = "F1"
folderModel1.projects = projectList1
FolderModel folderModel2 = new FolderModel();
folderModel2.folder_id = 2
folderModel2.folder_name = "F2"
folderModel2.projects = projectList2
FolderModel folderModel3 = new FolderModel();
folderModel3.folder_id = 3
folderModel3.folder_name = "F3"
folderModel3.projects = projectList3
ResultModel resultModel = new ResultModel();
List<FolderModel> folderList = new List<>();
folderList.add(folderModel1);
folderList.add(folderModel2);
folderList.add(folderModel3);
resultModel.folders = folderList
SQL Data
folder_id | folder_name | project_id | project_name | project_description
1 F1 11 F1P1 F1P1
2 F2 21 F2P1 F2P1
2 F2 22 F2P2 F2P2
3 F3 31 F3P1 F3P1
4 F4 41 F4P1 F4P1
5 F5 51 F5P1 F5P1
This is what I have tried
var result = resultModel.folders.GroupBy(x => new { x.folder_id }).ToList();
I am sure that after group by I have to select name but not sure how can I generate project into a list and add it to main folder id. Can someone please guide on this.
You can query like this:
var result =
resultModel
.folders
.GroupBy(x => new { x.folder_id })
.Select(s => new
{
folder_id = s.Key,
folder_name = s.First().folder_name
})
.ToList();
It seems to me that you're looking for this:
var folders = new []
{
new { folder_id = 1, folder_name = "F1", project_id = 11, project_name = "F1P1", project_description = "F1P1" },
new { folder_id = 2, folder_name = "F2", project_id = 21, project_name = "F2P1", project_description = "F2P1" },
new { folder_id = 2, folder_name = "F2", project_id = 22, project_name = "F2P2", project_description = "F2P2" },
new { folder_id = 3, folder_name = "F3", project_id = 31, project_name = "F3P1", project_description = "F3P1" },
new { folder_id = 4, folder_name = "F4", project_id = 41, project_name = "F4P1", project_description = "F4P1" },
new { folder_id = 5, folder_name = "F5", project_id = 51, project_name = "F5P1", project_description = "F5P1" },
};
List<FolderModel> result =
folders
.GroupBy(
x => new { x.folder_id, x.folder_name },
x => new { x.project_id, x.project_name, x.project_description })
.Select(x => new FolderModel()
{
folder_id = x.Key.folder_id,
folder_name = x.Key.folder_name,
projects = x.Select(y => new ProjectModel()
{
project_id = y.project_id,
project_name = y.project_name,
project_description = y.project_description,
}).ToList(),
})
.ToList();
I'm using the following code:
DynamoDBContextConfig config = new DynamoDBContextConfig()
{
ConsistentRead = false,
Conversion = DynamoDBEntryConversion.V2
};
using (DynamoDBContext context = new DynamoDBContext(config))
{
long unixTimestamp = (long)(DateTime.UtcNow.Subtract(new DateTime(1970, 1, 1))).TotalSeconds;
QTrackStatus qTrackStatus = new QTrackStatus()
{
Key = "m#m.com",
EventCode = "CC",
EventDateTime = "2019-09-09 14:00:30",
EventLocation = "BFS",
EventLastUpdate = unixTimestamp
};
DynamoDBOperationConfig dynamoDBOperationConfig = new DynamoDBOperationConfig()
{
QueryFilter = new List<ScanCondition>()
{
{ new ScanCondition("EventCode", ScanOperator.NotEqual, "CC") }
},
ConditionalOperator = ConditionalOperatorValues.And
};
await context.SaveAsync(qTrackStatus, dynamoDBOperationConfig);
}
What I'm trying to do is only save the record if the EventCode is not CC. Currently it's always saving. I could retrieve the record first, do a check and then call SaveAsync if required - however I'd like to do it all in the SaveAsync call. Is this possible?
Unless I've missed something, it doesn't look like this is possible with the higher level api. I ended up re-factoring to the following:
AmazonDynamoDBClient client = new AmazonDynamoDBClient();
UpdateItemRequest updateItemRequest = new UpdateItemRequest()
{
TableName = "QTrackStatus",
ReturnValues = ReturnValue.ALL_NEW,
ConditionExpression = "EventCode <> :ec",
UpdateExpression = "SET EventCode = :ec, EventDateTime = :edt, EventLocation = :el, EventLastUpdate = :elu",
ExpressionAttributeValues = new Dictionary<string, AttributeValue>()
{
{ ":ec", new AttributeValue("CC") },
{ ":edt", new AttributeValue("2019-09-09 14:00:30") },
{ ":el", new AttributeValue("BFS") },
{ ":elu", new AttributeValue() { N = ((long)(DateTime.UtcNow.Subtract(new DateTime(1970, 1, 1))).TotalSeconds).ToString() } }
},
Key = new Dictionary<string, AttributeValue>()
{
{ "Key", new AttributeValue("m#m.com") }
}
};
try
{
UpdateItemResponse updateItemResponse = await client.UpdateItemAsync(updateItemRequest);
}
catch(ConditionalCheckFailedException e)
{
}
This allows me to achieve my goal.
I want to mock the UniteofWork.FileApproveOverrideRepo.GetAllOverrideApprovals method
Everything working based on the code below just mylist is empty.
public async Task<List<FileApprovalOverrideResponse>> GetAllOverrideApprovals(int cpId)
{
var overrideApprovals = await UnitOfWork.FileApprovalOverrideRepository.Get(t => t.CPId == cpId, null, t => t.ActionedByUser.Company);
var mylist = overrideApprovals.ToList();
return MapperInstance.Map<List<FileApprovalOverrideResponse>>(mylist);
}
And here is how I mock my method :
var mockedUnitOfWork = new Mock<IUnitOfWork>();
var mockedGenericRepoCPApproval = new Mock<IGenericAsyncRepository<FileApprovalOverride>>();
var listOfFileApprovalOverrride = new FileApprovalOverride[] {
new FileApprovalOverride()
{
FileApprovalOverrideId = 2,
FileId = 2,
CPId = 2,
ApprovalStatus = 3,
IntendedApproverType = (byte)approvType,
IsValid = true,
Reason = ""
},
new FileApprovalOverride()
{
FileApprovalOverrideId = 2,
FileId = 2,
CPId = 2,
ApprovalStatus = 3,
IntendedApproverType = (byte)approvType,
IsValid = true,
Reason = "",
}
};
var myenumerable = listOfFileApprovalOverrride;
mockedGenericRepoCPApproval.Setup(_ => _.Get(t => t.CPId == 1, null, t => t.ActionedByUser.Company)).ReturnsAsync(myenumerable);
mockedUnitOfWork.Setup(_ => _.FileApprovalOverrideRepository).Returns(mockedGenericRepoCPApproval.Object);
var cpApprovalService = new CpApprovalService(mockCPApprovalRepository.Object, new Mock<ICPRepository>().Object, new Mock<ICPService>().Object, new Mock<ICompanyRepository>().Object, new Mock<ICPLinkedCompanyService>().Object, new Mock<ICPExportService>().Object, new Mock<IEmailService>().Object, new Mock<ICPContactService>().Object, new Mock<ISystemUserRespository>().Object, new Mock<IUserManagementService>().Object, new Mock<IAuditLogService>().Object, new Mock<ISignCharterParty>().Object, new Mock<IEmailQueuer>().Object);
cpApprovalService.UnitOfWork = mockedUnitOfWork.Object;
cpApprovalService.MapperInstance = mapperInstanse;
return cpApprovalService;
I put a break point where I am creating the mock even there the myenumerable is correct and it has two members but when I run the test then the mylist is empty.
I have a dynamic rule engine and i want to pass class to this and each time the class is sent differently.
For example:
Order MyOrder = new Order()
{
OrderId = 1,
Customer = new Customer()
{
FirstName = "John",
LastName = "Doe",
Country = new Country()
{
CountryCode = "AUS"
}
},
Items = new List<Item>(){
new Item(){ ItemCode = "MM23", Cost=5.25M},
new Item(){ ItemCode = "LD45", Cost=5.25M},
new Item(){ ItemCode = "Test", Cost=3.33M},
}
};
I want to change this:
var compiledRule = engine.CompileRule<Order>(rule);
to :
dynamic obj = MyOrder;
var compiledRule = engine.CompileRule<?????>(rule);
how can I get Type of obj and put instead of "????"
I found solution after search a lot
var engine = new MRE();
var compiledRule = engine.CompileRule<Order>(rule);
change to:
var engine = new MRE();
var compiledRule = typeof(MRE).GetMethod("CompileRule").MakeGenericMethod(myOrder.GetType())
.Invoke(engine, new object[] { rule}) as dynamic;