so far I have been using a standard winforms TabControl to host my different modules of my application statically, for example different GridViews. But this way the whole form becomes too big as it contains too many controls.
I would like to separate all the different "pages" each as a UserControl (from what I've heard, that's better than using Forms). Is that ok? And how is that best implemented with Telerik controls?
I thought about using a RadDock control and add my UserControls as tabbedDocuments to it.
DocumentWindow docWindow = new DocumentWindow();
MyUserControls.FirstGrid ctrl = new MyUserControls.FirstGrid();
docWindow.Controls.Add(ctrl);
radDock1.AddDocument(docWindow);
Is that ok to do? Is there a better way?
Forms are very different compared to UserControls. I don't know exactly how you would like to separate the different pages of your application, but a UserControl always requires something to 'host' or display the UserControl in. A Form is a 'standalone window', basically.
Using the RadDock and tabbed documents is a valid way of doing it, but there a plenty of ways to separate different pages in your application, so I can't say which one fits best your requirements.
I have two propositions for you:
If you decide to go with UserControls, you can use RadPageView (or RadDock) and on each RadPageViewPage (or DocumentWindow in RadDock) to add the UserControl in the Controls collection and show it.
You can use the Auto MDI functionality of RadDock and show your forms as MDI windows in it. More information is available here.
Related
I am doing my first steps programming a little toolbox in C#.
I want to choose the program to run via a menustrip.
How can I switch all visible textboxes, buttons etc. on the same form? I don't want to open a new form. Do I have to show/hide every element "by hand" or is there a better solution?
I hope you get my problem.
Thanks in advance.
Yes totally understood.
You need a way to navigate between different fragments within your application.
Since these are your first steps and not a legacy app, why aren't you starting with WPF which is the successor of Winforms ? (newer better)
See how can you achieve such functionally in WPF
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/desktop/wpf/app-development/navigation-overview?view=netframeworkdesktop-4.8
Although the terms are similar and also apply in winforms.
What you want to do is to create all the buttons etc as part of a UserControl. You can then add your custom UserControl to the form. This should allow you to switch the user control for some other control, or change the visibility for the whole user control.
This can also allow you to place multiple user controls side by side or in some other layout.
I am creating a windows mobile application that has several different screens. At the bottom of each screen is a menu bar which the user can click on to navigate each screen.
My question is should I use a new form for each screen and clone the menu or use one form and have all the other screens as a control and add them to the main form?
Cheers
I'd vote for controls.
Both mechanisms can achieve the flow you want, and from a fundamental perspective neither is going to really be worse (as in load times, memory consumed, or what have you) so it's largely a personal style decision. Me, I use a UI framework that lends itself heavily to UserControls, so that's what I use.
Generally speaking, when I create an app I have a single parent/host form that has Workspaces where I put my Views. Thos Views are UserControls. Whether I use a tabbed workspace or a desk workspace, they still end up as Controls. The only reason I use more than one full-up Form is if I have a dialog (warnings, inputs, etc) where I will be doing a ShowDialog call.
Per this link, there is no MDI functionality in Windows Mobile.
In our application, we use different forms for each screen.
There are two ways to open up new windows:
formName.ShowDialog(): the new screen will be opened as a child of the other screen. In this case, you won't be able to access your parent form until the child is closed.
formName.Show(): the new screen will NOT be opened as a child of the other screen. Hence, you can access your parent even if the child is not closed.
You can use TabControl in single form with each tab having it's own controls. No need to add controls dynamically. And one single form. The way to achieve this is discussed in more detail in this answer.
Creating Wizards for Windows Forms in C#
Create own TextBox, Button etc control as own control using User control in C# Windows application, is this good idea?
I wanted make consistency for through out the application. Suppose if I want to change the Textbox border color then all forms textbox updated with this changes. It's just an example.
Please suggest me.
I don't recommend using UserControl just for consistency. If application skinning is what you are after, look into WPF. It makes it relatively simple to skin an application (or even a window, or smaller groups)
Here is an article on skinning with WPF: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/19782/Creating-a-Skinned-User-Interface-in-WPF
Another alternative, staying within Windows Forms, is creating a class that inherits from TextBox, and using that class throughout the application. The Factory pattern would work well here. You could even adapt it to multiple skins.
It's not a bad idea to provide custom controls that match your "User Experience" (UX). It really just depends on what you are trying to accomplish with your program.
I have to design a control_panel form. This will have many tabs. How should I design this? Should I make different new forms for each tab or is there a concept of Masterpage in C# WinForms?
Please give me your opinions. Thanks.
It's easy enough to whip up something like this in WinForms, using a TabControl, filled with several different TabPages, and a corresponding ImageList to hold the icons for each tab:
Then you can just place the controls you want on each TabPage as you normally would. The designer has excellent built-in support for the TabControl, allowing you to simply click on the tab you want to switch to it as you could if your application was running. Here's a tutorial on implementing tabs in C#.
If you need more extensibility and encapsulation than provided by adding individual controls to each TabPage, you can create a custom UserControl corresponding to each of your tabs, and then place an instance of that UserControl into the TabPage. I don't really know much about MasterPages, but creating a base UserControl that all of your other UserControls inherit off (and then add their unique elements) of seems like it would provide similar functionality.
You have tab control in windows form.
you can go through MSDN article for creating tabs.
User Controls -- Do they serve a special purpose?
As far as I can tell they are no different to forms - they have the same toolbox and features.
Are there certain times when they are appropriate to use over forms?
It would be interesting to understand what they are good for.
You use them to group a set of controls and behaviors together in a re-usable way. You can't show a control on the screen unless it's added to a form somewhere.
One good example is a textbox. It's very common to have a label next to your textboxes. You can build a user control to make this easier. Just drop a label and a textbox on the control, expose whatever your properties you want, setup the new control in your toolbox, and now you can just drop this control on your form instead of needing to arrange a label and a toolbox on the form separately.
You could kind of think of them as a panel which "remembers" what controls you put on it. And there's one more important piece. You can put code in these controls as well, and use that to also build special behaviors into your custom controls.
I have to disagree (slightly) with the selected answer. Reusability is only part of what a UserControl is for.
All Controls are reusable. Almost all controls are reusable on the same Form/Window/Panel/etc. For example, a TextBox is a control.
There are two ways to create your own reusable control:
Custom Control
Completely custom, and reusable.
Created entirely in code.
You get a bit more granular control over what your control is doing this way.
Lighter weight (usually), because there isn't anything added in for designability within Visual Studio.
In ASP.Net only: No "HTML" type file to use or edit.
User Control
Completely custom, and reusable.
Created partially in a designer in Visual Studio, and partially in code. (via code behind)
Much easier to deal with from a visual aspect.
A little heavier, as there is pre-existing code added in by the framework to support designing inside Visual Studio.
In ASP.Net only: You can change the appearance a bit simply by editing the .ascx file (basically HTML).
User Controls serve the purpose of reusing controls.
Imagine you need a search box in several pages of your application. You can create a search user control and drop it in every page where you want it visible.
So, it's nothing more than a container that aggregates reusable blocks for your pages.
Forms have a lot of extra furniture that you don't need if you simply want a collection of controls together - the minimize and maximize buttons for example. If you just simply grouped your controls in a Panel, you'd have all the event handlers on the same form as the panel - with a user control, the event handling code is in the user control class, not the form class.
You can reuse the same control on many forms. In fact all items you are using while creating windows forms are the controls. User controls are just extra controls extending controls library provided by .NET.
In ASP.NET, user controls enable you to split your page into reusable components. For example, you may want to have a search box which can be used in different places on your website, so you'd use a user control. They can also be used for partial page caching. You can cache portions of your page to improve performance.