We Keep Coding

Can't establish connection using StreamSocket (universal windows)

Im trying to follow this code sample from microsoft, who is a basic code for sending/receiving data over network from windows 10 computer/phone.
Im on VS2015, i have a phone on W10 and my computer also.
The problem is that my application seems to create packet and send one to establish the connection (i have seen this packet with wireshark), but i never received it on the server side.
Here is code to listen port from the actual internet connection available and wait for a connection :
public static async void StartServer()
{
try
{
StreamSocketListener listener = new StreamSocketListener();
//ConnectionProfile internetConnectionProfile = NetworkInformation.GetInternetConnectionProfile();
//await listener.BindServiceNameAsync("5043", SocketProtectionLevel.PlainSocket, internetConnectionProfile.NetworkAdapter);
listener.ConnectionReceived += OnConnection;
await listener.BindServiceNameAsync("5043");
Debug.WriteLine("Server Started !");
}
catch (Exception)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Error StartServer Method !");
}
}
The method "OnConnection" is never reach cause the event "ConnectionReceived" is never called.
Here is the code to establish connection (the string ipDestination contain the internet ip address from my phone for example, that i get from checkip.dyndns.org) :
private static StreamSocket socket;
public static async void Connect(string ipDestination)
{
try
{
//Destination Ip address
HostName host = new HostName(ipDestination);
ConnectionProfile internetConnectionProfile = NetworkInformation.GetInternetConnectionProfile();
socket = new StreamSocket();
socket.Control.KeepAlive = true;
await socket.ConnectAsync(host, "5043");
//EXCEPTION RAISE HERE after a moment "System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, cant join destination.
Debug.WriteLine("Connected !");
}
catch (Exception)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Erreur Connect Method !");
}
}
I think i should miss something but i dont know why and im block at this part since a long and can't continue my project...
I apologize for the bad english I try to make my best :)
Update from comments :
As Jay Zuo suggested, i have try to use local address on private
network and it works, i can establish connection, send and receive
data without problems... So the problem come when i use internet IP
address, and i still can't figure why...
As Kiewic suggested, i have simplify my code and commented the
precedent version.

How to reconnect to a socket gracefully

I have a following method that connects to an end point when my program starts
ChannelSocket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp);
var remoteIpAddress = IPAddress.Parse(ChannelIp);
ChannelEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(remoteIpAddress, ChannelPort);
ChannelSocket.Connect(ChannelEndPoint);
I also have a timer that is set to trigger every 60 seconds to call CheckConnectivity, that attempts to send an arbitrary byte array to the end point to make sure that the connection is still alive, and if the send fails, it will attempt to reconnect.
public bool CheckConnectivity(bool isReconnect)
{
if (ChannelSocket != null)
{
var blockingState = ChannelSocket.Blocking;
try
{
var tmp = new byte[] { 0 };
ChannelSocket.Blocking = false;
ChannelSocket.Send(tmp);
}
catch (SocketException e)
{
try
{
ReconnectChannel();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return false;
}
}
}
else
{
ConnectivityLog.Warn(string.Format("{0}:{1} is null!", ChannelIp, ChannelPort));
return false;
}
return true;
}
private void ReconnectChannel()
{
try
{
ChannelSocket.Shutdown(SocketShutdown.Both);
ChannelSocket.Disconnect(true);
ChannelSocket.Close();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ConnectivityLog.Error(ex);
}
ChannelSocket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp);
var remoteIpAddress = IPAddress.Parse(ChannelIp);
ChannelEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(remoteIpAddress, ChannelPort);
ChannelSocket.Connect(ChannelEndPoint);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
if (ChannelSocket.Connected)
{
ConnectivityLog.Info(string.Format("{0}:{1} is reconnected!", ChannelIp, ChannelPort));
}
else
{
ConnectivityLog.Warn(string.Format("{0}:{1} failed to reconnect!", ChannelIp, ChannelPort));
}
}
So how I'd test the above, is to physically unplug the LAN cable from my ethernet device, allowing my code to attempt to reconnect (which fails obviously) and reconnect back the LAN cable.
However, even after reconnecting the LAN cable (able to ping), ChannelSocket.Connect(ChannelEndPoint) in my Reconnect method always throws this error
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 192.168.168.160:4001
If I were to restart my whole application, it connects successfully. How can I tweak my reconnect method such that I don't have to restart my application to reconnect back to my Ethernet device?

If an application closes a TCP/IP port, the protocol dictates that the port stays in TIME_WAIT state for a certain duration (default of 240 seconds on a windows machine).
See following for references -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/137984
http://www.pctools.com/guides/registry/detail/878/
What this means for your scenario - is that you cannot expect to close (willingly or unwillingly) and re-open a port within a short period of time (even several seconds). Despite some registry tweaks which you'd find on internet.. the port will be un-available for any app on windows, for a minimum of 30 seconds. (Again, default is 240 seconds)
Your options - here are limited...
From the documentation at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4xzx2d41(v=vs.110).aspx -
"If the socket has been previously disconnected, then you cannot use this (Connect) method to restore the connection. Use one of the asynchronous BeginConnect methods to reconnect. This is a limitation of the underlying provider."
The reason why documentation suggests that BeginConnect must be used is what I mentioned above.. It simply doesn't expect to be able to establish the connection right away.. and hence the only option is to make the call asynchronously, and while you wait for the connection to get established in several minutes, do expect and plan for it to fail. Essentially, likely not an ideal option.
If the long wait and uncertainty is not acceptable, then your other option is to somehow negotiate a different port between the client and server. (For example, in theory you could use UDP, which is connectionless, to negotiate the new TCP port you'd re-establish the connection on). Communication using UDP, in theory of course, itself is not guaranteed by design. But should work most of the times (Today, networking in typical org is not that flaky / unreliable). Subjective to scenario / opinion, perhaps better than option 1, but more work and smaller but finite chance of not working.
As suggested in one of the comments, this is where application layer protocols like http and http services have an advantage. Use them, instead of low level sockets, if you can.
If acceptable, this is the best option to go with.
(PS - FYI - For HTTP, there is a lot of special handling built into OS, including windows - For example, there is a dedicated driver Http.sys, specially for dealing with multiple apps trying to listen on same port 80 etc.. The details here are a topic for another time.. point is, there is lots of goodness and hard work done for you, when it comes to HTTP)

Maybe you should switch to a higher abstraction class, which better deals with all these nifty little details?
I'm going to use for these network connections the TcpListener and TcpClient classes. The usage of these classes is quite easy:
The client side:
public void GetInformationAsync(IPAddress ipAddress)
{
_Log.Info("Start retrieving informations from address " + ipAddress + ".");
var tcpClient = new TcpClient();
tcpClient.BeginConnect(ipAddress, _PortNumber, OnTcpClientConnected, tcpClient);
}
private void OnTcpClientConnected(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
{
try
{
using (var tcpClient = (TcpClient)asyncResult.AsyncState)
{
tcpClient.EndConnect(asyncResult);
var ipAddress = ((IPEndPoint)tcpClient.Client.RemoteEndPoint).Address;
var stream = tcpClient.GetStream();
stream.ReadTimeout = 5000;
_Log.Debug("Connection established to " + ipAddress + ".");
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
var information = (MyInformation)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
_Log.Info("Successfully retrieved information from address " + ipAddress + ".");
InformationAvailable.FireEvent(this, new InformationEventArgs(information));
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_Log.Error("Error in retrieving informations.", ex);
return;
}
}
The server side:
public void Start()
{
ThrowIfDisposed();
if (_TcpServer != null;)
_TcpServer.Stop();
_TcpServer = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Any, _PortNumber);
_TcpServer.Start();
_TcpServer.BeginAcceptTcpClient(OnClientConnected, _TcpServer);
_Log.Info("Start listening for incoming connections on " + _TcpServer.LocalEndpoint + ".");
}
private void OnClientConnected(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
{
var tcpServer = (TcpListener)asyncResult.AsyncState;
IPAddress address = IPAddress.None;
try
{
if (tcpServer.Server != null
&& tcpServer.Server.IsBound)
tcpServer.BeginAcceptTcpClient(OnClientConnected, tcpServer);
using (var client = tcpServer.EndAcceptTcpClient(asyncResult))
{
address = ((IPEndPoint)client.Client.RemoteEndPoint).Address;
_Log.Debug("Client connected from address " + address + ".");
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
var informations = new MyInformation()
{
// Initialize properties with desired values.
};
var stream = client.GetStream();
formatter.Serialize(stream, description);
_Log.Debug("Sucessfully serialized information into network stream.");
}
}
catch (ObjectDisposedException)
{
// This normally happens, when the server will be stopped
// and their exists no other reliable way to check this state
// before calling EndAcceptTcpClient().
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_Log.Error(String.Format("Cannot send instance information to {0}.", address), ex);
}
}
This code works and doesn't make any problems with a lost connection on the client side. If you have a lost connection on the server side you have to re-establish the listener, but that's another story.

In ReconnectChannel just dispose the ChannelSocket object.
try
{
`//ChannelSocket.Shutdown(SocketShutdown.Both);
//ChannelSocket.Disconnect(true);
//ChannelSocket.Close();
ChannelSocket.Dispose();`
}
This is working for me. Let me know if it doesn't work for you.

Pair bluetooth devices to a computer with 32feet .NET Bluetooth library

If you want to know how to use 32feet.NET library to communicate with bluetooth devices, read the solution
I am currently trying to communicate via bluetooth between a computer and a self-built .NET Gadgeteer prototype.
The Gadgeteer prototype consists of the mainboard, a power supply and a bluetooth module. The module is in discoverable mode.
On the computer a custom bluetooth program based on 32feet .NET Bluetooth is running. The program detects all bluetooth devices in range and tries to pair with them. However, this is not done automatically at the moment, I have to enter a pairing code for the device.
How can I pair devices without entering the pairing code?
Devices are found, the problem is the pairing part. I experimented a lot, but didn't find a solution...
foreach (BluetoothDeviceInfo device in this.deviceList)
{
try
{
//BluetoothClient client = new BluetoothClient(this.CreateNewEndpoint(localAddress));
//BluetoothEndPoint ep = this.CreateNewEndpoint(device.DeviceAddress);
EventHandler<BluetoothWin32AuthenticationEventArgs> handler = new EventHandler<BluetoothWin32AuthenticationEventArgs>(HandleRequests);
BluetoothWin32Authentication auth = new BluetoothWin32Authentication(handler);
BluetoothSecurity.PairRequest(device.DeviceAddress, null);
}
}
This code block initiates the pairing and it works, but Windows is asking me to enter the pairing code for the device. I read about the BluetoothWin32Authentication to prevent this case but I don't get it right.
private void HandleRequests(object that, BluetoothWin32AuthenticationEventArgs e)
{
e.Confirm = true;
}
This is the code of the event handler (http://32feet.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=BluetoothWin32Authentication)
If you simply want to allow the pairing to go ahead when to SSP devices are connecting then handling the callback and setting e.Confirm=True will be enough -- but that is a little insecure...
I am confused -.- The goal is that the application and the gadgeteer module can send data in both directions without any user interference.
Is it true that I can't pair devices automatically without user interaction?
Is it true that if two device were already paired they can exchange data without user interaction?

I figured out how to solve my problems and my knowledge about Bluetooth connections is a bit bigger now. If someone else has problems with that, I provide my solution. The code examples represent the C# implementation of a bluetooth controller with the 32feet Bluetooth library.
Scanning
This means that devices in range are detected. My code:
// mac is mac address of local bluetooth device
BluetoothEndPoint localEndpoint = new BluetoothEndPoint(mac, BluetoothService.SerialPort);
// client is used to manage connections
BluetoothClient localClient = new BluetoothClient(localEndpoint);
// component is used to manage device discovery
BluetoothComponent localComponent = new BluetoothComponent(localClient);
// async methods, can be done synchronously too
localComponent.DiscoverDevicesAsync(255, true, true, true, true, null);
localComponent.DiscoverDevicesProgress += new EventHandler<DiscoverDevicesEventArgs>(component_DiscoverDevicesProgress);
localComponent.DiscoverDevicesComplete += new EventHandler<DiscoverDevicesEventArgs>(component_DiscoverDevicesComplete);
private void component_DiscoverDevicesProgress(object sender, DiscoverDevicesEventArgs e)
{
// log and save all found devices
for (int i = 0; i < e.Devices.Length; i++)
{
if (e.Devices[i].Remembered)
{
Print(e.Devices[i].DeviceName + " (" + e.Devices[i].DeviceAddress + "): Device is known");
}
else
{
Print(e.Devices[i].DeviceName + " (" + e.Devices[i].DeviceAddress + "): Device is unknown");
}
this.deviceList.Add(e.Devices[i]);
}
}
private void component_DiscoverDevicesComplete(object sender, DiscoverDevicesEventArgs e)
{
// log some stuff
}
Pairing
This means that devices get coupled with the local bluetooth device. This needs to be done once by entering a code of both sides. Can be done via code so that the user doesn't even notice that a device was added. My code for this purpose:
// get a list of all paired devices
BluetoothDeviceInfo[] paired = localClient.DiscoverDevices(255, false, true, false, false);
// check every discovered device if it is already paired
foreach (BluetoothDeviceInfo device in this.deviceList)
{
bool isPaired = false;
for (int i = 0; i < paired.Length; i++)
{
if (device.Equals(paired[i]))
{
isPaired = true;
break;
}
}
// if the device is not paired, pair it!
if (!isPaired)
{
// replace DEVICE_PIN here, synchronous method, but fast
isPaired = BluetoothSecurity.PairRequest(device.DeviceAddress, DEVICE_PIN);
if (isPaired)
{
// now it is paired
}
else
{
// pairing failed
}
}
}
Connecting
This means establishing a connection and exchanging of data. Again some code:
// check if device is paired
if (device.Authenticated)
{
// set pin of device to connect with
localClient.SetPin(DEVICE_PIN);
// async connection method
localClient.BeginConnect(device.DeviceAddress, BluetoothService.SerialPort, new AsyncCallback(Connect), device);
}
// callback
private void Connect(IAsyncResult result)
{
if (result.IsCompleted)
{
// client is connected now :)
}
}
If you keep the order scan, pair, connect, everything should work fine. To send or receive data, use the GetStream() method of the BluetoothClient. It provides a network stream that can be manipulated.
Receiving a connection
If you want another device to connect with your device you need to listen to incoming connection requests. This only works if the device have already been paired before. My code:
BluetoothListener l = new BluetoothListener(LOCAL_MAC, BluetoothService.SerialPort);
l.Start(10);
l.BeginAcceptBluetoothClient(new AsyncCallback(AcceptConnection), l);
void AcceptConnection(IAsyncResult result){
if (result.IsCompleted){
BluetoothClient remoteDevice = ((BluetoothListener)result.AsyncState).EndAcceptBluetoothClient(result);
}
}
Replace LOCAL_MAC with a valid BluetoothAddress (e.g. by using BluetoothAddress.Parse();). After the devices are connected they can exchange messages via the underlying stream. If the connection does not work there might be authentication issues, so try setting the local device pin in the listener (l.SetPin(LOCAL_MAC, MY_PASSWORD);

Check if a port is open

I can't seem to find anything that tells me if a port in my router is open or not.
Is this even possible?
The code I have right now doesn't really seem to work...
private void ScanPort()
{
string hostname = "localhost";
int portno = 9081;
IPAddress ipa = (IPAddress) Dns.GetHostAddresses(hostname)[0];
try
{
System.Net.Sockets.Socket sock =
new System.Net.Sockets.Socket(System.Net.Sockets.AddressFamily.InterNetwork,
System.Net.Sockets.SocketType.Stream,
System.Net.Sockets.ProtocolType.Tcp);
sock.Connect(ipa, portno);
if (sock.Connected == true) // Port is in use and connection is successful
MessageBox.Show("Port is Closed");
sock.Close();
}
catch (System.Net.Sockets.SocketException ex)
{
if (ex.ErrorCode == 10061) // Port is unused and could not establish connection
MessageBox.Show("Port is Open!");
else
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
}
}

Try this:
using(TcpClient tcpClient = new TcpClient())
{
try {
tcpClient.Connect("127.0.0.1", 9081);
Console.WriteLine("Port open");
} catch (Exception) {
Console.WriteLine("Port closed");
}
}
You should probably change 127.0.0.1 to something like 192.168.0.1 or whatever your router's IP address is.

A better solution where you can even specify a timeout:
using System;
using System.Net.Sockets;
// ...
bool IsPortOpen(string host, int port, TimeSpan timeout)
{
try
{
using(var client = new TcpClient())
{
var result = client.BeginConnect(host, port, null, null);
var success = result.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout);
client.EndConnect(result);
return success;
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
And, in F#:
open System
open System.Net.Sockets
let isPortOpen (host: string) (port: int) (timeout: TimeSpan): bool =
try
use client = new TcpClient()
let result = client.BeginConnect(host, port, null, null)
let success = result.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne timeout
client.EndConnect result
success
with
| _ -> false
let available = isPortOpen "stackoverflow.com" 80 (TimeSpan.FromSeconds 10.)
printf "Is stackoverflow available? %b" available

There is no way to know if the port is forwarded in your router, except if there is a program listening on that port.
As you may see in the Clinton answer, the .Net class being used is TcpClient and that is because you are using a TCP socket to connect to. That is the way operating systems make connections: using a socket. However, a router just forwards the packets (layer 3 of the OSI Model) in or out. In your case, what your router is doing is called: NAT. It is one public IP shared by a one or more private IPs. That´s why you are making a port forwarding.
There may be a lot of routers in the path of the packets, and you will never know what had happened.
Let´s imagine you are sending a letter in the traditional way. Perhaps you can write in the letter that the receiver must answer, in order to check he/she is there (you and the receiver are the sockets). If you receive an answer you will be sure he/she is there, but if you don´t receive anything you don´t know if the mailman (in your case the router) forgot to deliver the letter, or the receiver hadn´t answered. You would also never know if the mailman has asked a friend to deliver that letter. Moreover, the mailman won´t open the letter in order to know he/she may answer because you are waiting for a reply. All you may do is wait some time to receive the answer. If you don´t receive anything in that period you will assume that the receiver isn´t where you sent the letter. That is a "timeout".
I saw an answer mentioning the nmap software. It´s really a very good and complex soft, but I think it will work in the same way. If there is no app listening in that port, there is no way to know if it is open or not.
Please, let me know if I was clear.

If you're connecting to the loopback adapter — localhost or 127.0.0.1 (there's no place like 127.0.0.1!), you're unlikely to ever go out to the router. The OS is smart enough to recognize that it's a special address. Dunno if that holds true as well if you actually specify your machine's "real" IP address.
See also this question: What is the purpose of the Microsoft Loopback Adapter?
Also note that running traceroute localhost (tracert localhost in Windows) shows that the only network node involved is your own machine. The router is never involved.

Other than BeginConnect you can also use ConnectAsync (added in .NET Framework 4.5 I think?).
TcpClient client = null;
try {
client = new TcpClient();
var task = client.ConnectAsync(host, port);
if (task.Wait(timeout)) {//if fails within timeout, task.Wait still returns true.
if (client.Connected) {
// port reachable
}
else
// connection refused probably
}
else
// timed out
}
catch (Exception ex) {
// connection failed
}
finally {
client.Close();
}
Full project is here because paping refuses to run and I couldn't find another "ping host:port" tool to my likes.

A port forward on the router cannot be tested from inside the LAN, you need to connect from the WAN (internet) side to see if a port forward is working or not.
Several internet sites offer services to check if a port is open:
What's My IP Port Scanner
GRC | ShieldsUP!
If you want to check with your own code, then you need to make sure the TCP/IP connection is rerouted via an external proxy or setup a tunnel. This has nothing to do with your code, it's basic networking 101.

public static bool PortInUse(int port)
{
bool inUse = false;
IPGlobalProperties ipProperties = IPGlobalProperties.GetIPGlobalProperties();
IPEndPoint [] ipEndPoints = ipProperties.GetActiveTcpListeners();
foreach(IPEndPoint endPoint in ipEndPoints)
{
if(endPoint.Port == port)
{
inUse = true;
break;
}
}
return inUse;
}

For me, I needed something blocking until the connection to the port is available or after a certain amount of retries. So, I figured out this code:
public bool IsPortOpen(string host, int port, int timeout, int retry)
{
var retryCount = 0;
while (retryCount < retry)
{
if (retryCount > 0)
Thread.Sleep(timeout);
try
{
using (var client = new TcpClient())
{
var result = client.BeginConnect(host, port, null, null);
var success = result.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout);
if (success)
return true;
client.EndConnect(result);
}
}
catch
{
// ignored
}
finally { retryCount++; }
}
return false;
}
Hope this helps!

also you can use ConnectAsync like
public async Task<bool> IsIPAndPortOpen(string hostOrIPAddress, int port, TimeSpan timeOut)
{
try
{
using (var client = new TcpClient())
{
var ct = new CancellationTokenSource(timeOut).Token;
await client.ConnectAsync(hostOrIPAddress, port, ct);
return true;
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}

public string GetAvailablePort()
{int startingPort=1000;
string portnumberinformation = string.Empty;
IPEndPoint[] endPoints;
List<int> portArray = new List<int>();
IPGlobalPr`enter code here`operties properties = IPGlobalProperties.GetIPGlobalProperties();`enter code here`
//getting active tcp listners
endPoints = properties.GetActiveTcpListeners();
portArray.AddRange(from n in endPoints
where n.Port >= startingPort
select n.Port);
portArray.Sort();
for (int i = 0; i < portArray.Count; i++)
{
if (check condition)
{
do somting
}
}
return portnumberinformation;
}

If it is Router the simplest way to check it through online services like
Port Checker
Port Forwarding Test
You can also try using telenet to chek wether port is accessible or not
telenet [ip-address] [port]

Socket Error 10060 while connecting to IO Modules

I am communicating between PC and IO modules with TCP connection over ethernet using Modbus protocol. I am using System.Net.Sockets.Socket class for opening and sending/receiving data. At first everything is fine. After some time(5 to 10 hours) I get the following SocketException with error code 10060 when the program calls Socket.Connect method. I try to reconnect after I get the exception but same exception is thrown.
A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond
During the normal execution(in the 5-10 hour duration before exception is thrown) I create a new tcp connection by closing old sockets and creating new ones. This is done many times. I check the number of tcp connections every time I reconnect and it stays same. I use the following method to connect many times where SocketWrapper is the class that I use to connect to modules and send/receive data.
How can I investigate this issue?
class SocketWrapper
{
IPAddress m_ipAddr;
Socket m_Socket;
int m_port;
public bool Connect(string i_szIPAddr, ProtocolType protocolType)
{
try
{
this.Disconnect();
this.m_ipAddr = IPAddress.Parse(i_szIPAddr);
this.m_port = 0x1f6;
IPEndPoint remoteEP = new IPEndPoint(this.m_ipAddr, this.m_port);
this.m_socket = new Socket(remoteEP.AddressFamily, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp);
this.m_socket.Connect(remoteEP);
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
public void Disconnect()
{
if (this.m_socket != null)
{
if(this.m_socket.Connected)
this.m_socket.Shutdown(SocketShutdown.Both);
this.m_socket.Close();
this.m_socket = null;
}
}
}