Is this susceptible to an injection attack - c#

Is the following c# snippet susceptible to a SQL Injection Attack?
string sql = #"
declare #sql navarchar(200)
set #sql = 'select * from customers where customerId = ' + convert(navarchar, #custId)
exec sp_sqlexec #sql
"
oSQL.Parameters.Add("custId", CustomerId);
DataTable dt = oSQL.ExecuteDataTable(sql);
I understand this is a trivial sql statement but I'm more interested in the approach of using exec sp_sqlexec. The sql statement is more dynamic than the one stated but don't think it's important for my question.

A slightly more secure solution would be to make the dynaimc query parameterized as well:
(Note that you should be using sp_executesql as well:
string sql = #"
declare #sql navarchar(200)
set #sql = 'select * from customers where customerId = #customerId'
exec sp_sqlexecuseSQL #sql, N'#customerId INT`, #customerId = #custId
"
oSQL.Parameters.Add("custId", CustomerId);
DataTable dt = oSQL.ExecuteDataTable(sql);

Updating answer based on comments from SO. Dynamic SQL (or really any SQL statement, this is a good rule to follow) in general usually is open to SQL Injection if their is a potential for user input. If all your parameters that make the SQL statment say come from another database or say a dropdown, etc then No it is not succeptible to SQL Injection.
The general rule to remember: Don't ever allow unvalidated data to get into a SQL statement. Everything should be validated and add them to the database as a parameter.

Related

How to pass schema name in a parameterized query

I need to add the schema value dynamically to the query. I was trying to construct it the way we usually use values but realised it does not work with the schema names the same way.
This was what I was trying to do
sql = "SELECT Name FROM [#dbo].[Members]";
...
command.Parameters.Add("#dbo", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = "dbo";
I know I can construct the query by directly adding the variable in the query like this:
sql = $#"SELECT Name FROM [{parameter}].[Members]";
But I wanted to disallow any kind of SQL Injection so want to go ahead using the parameterized query as above.
Can anyone help with a possible idea to implement this?
TIA
The schema is not a parameter. Query parameters are equivalent to function parameters in eg C#. They're used to pass values. In SQL, the table and columns are equivalent to C# types and properties. You can't specify them by name. The schema in a SQL query is similar to the Namespace in C#. The table is equivalent to a Type. In C#, just because Sales.Record and Diagnostics.Record have the same type name doesn't mean the two types can be used the same way.
The question doesn't explain why the schema name is passed dynamically. It's almost certain there are easier, more efficient and safer ways to query similar tables in multiple schemas, but the solution would depend on the actual problem.
There are some techniques that can be used to make such a dynamic query safe if not efficient. I'd really, really try to avoid treating the schema as a value though.
Using QUOTENAME
One option, is to use QUOTENAME in a T-SQL script to construct a dynamic query. At least this way a syntax error will be thrown if the schema and table names are wrong:
sql = #"declare #sql nvarchar(max)='SELECT Name FROM ' + QUOTENAME(#dbo) + '.[Members]';
select #sql;
exec sp_executesql #sql;";
...
command.Parameters.Add("#dbo", SqlDbType.NVarChar,100).Value = "dbo";
QUOTENAME will convert something like sys].schemas; PRINT ''x''; -- to [[sys]].schemas; PRINT 'x'; --]. This will result in an error :
declare #sql nvarchar(max)= 'select * from [' +quotename('sys].schemas; PRINT ''x''; --')
select #sql
exec sp_executesql #sql;
--------
select * from [[sys]].schemas; PRINT 'x'; --]
Invalid object name '[sys].schemas; PRINT 'x'; --'.
It's too easy to make quoting mistakes with such scripts. This could be extracted into a stored procedure :
CREATE PROCEDURE GetMemberNameBySchema
#dbo nvarchar(100)
as
declare #sql nvarchar(max)='SELECT Name FROM ' + QUOTENAME(#dbo) + '.[Members]';
exec sp_executesql #sql;
Verify the Schema name
Query sys.schema to ensue the schema is correct before constructing the query. Let's say you're using Dapper (so I don't have to write all the ADO.NET code) :
var schema="dbo";
var isValid=connection.ExecuteScalar<bool?>(
"select 1 from sys.schema where name=#name",
new {name=schema});
//isValid will be null if nothing is found
if(isValid ==true)
{
var names=connection.Query($"SELECT Name FROM [{schema}].[Members]");
...
}
This is safe to do because the first query ensured the schema name is valid.
You can only pass parameters to dynamic query not object names as far as I know. You can do something like below:
Update after seeing Panagiotis' solution. we can take out the exists part outside. I am no expert in C# but something similar we want to do:
DECLARE #Table NVARCHAR(100);
DECLARE #Schema NVARCHAR(50);
SET #Schema = 'dbo'; --This part will come from C#
SET #Table = 'Tablename'; --This part will come from C#
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(MAX);
IF EXISTS(SELECT * FROM sys.tables WHERE name = #Table and schema_id = SCHEMA_ID(#Schema))
BEGIN
SET #sql = N'SELECT TOP 1 * FROM '+ QUOTENAME(#Schema) + '.' + QUOTENAME(#Table) +';';
PRINT #sql;
EXEC sp_executesql #sql;
END
ELSE
RAISERROR('Table or Schema doesn''t exist.',16,1);
In the IF EXISTS you need to pass the table name and schema name as parameter to dynamic query.
In the actual query you need to make a concatenation of table name and schema name.
This will prevent sql injection as well and if the table is not there then raise an error.

Pass a table name to INSERT INTO tablename from outside or a variable?

I have more tables with great number of entries in production that I want to move to history database.
I have tried to use this query that works fine but I don't know if there is a possibility to give a name of a tables from outside. I don't want to write this query for every database and table.
INSERT INTO [database.history].dbo.tablename
SELECT *
FROM [database.live].dbo.table
DELETE FROM [database.history].dbo.tablename
I want to give names of databases and tables from the outside. I use dapper ORM. Is there any solution to use something similar to other types? For example.
DECLARE #ProductionTableName nvarchar(250) = '[database.live].dbo.table'
My databases are on the same server.
My queries are in files and I my call looks something like.
string query = queryFile;
var param = new {Parameter1= stringValue};
var result = Connection.Query<long>(query, param);
You can't parameterize identifiers in SQL. What you can do is use dynamic SQL.
Please note, however, that using dynamic SQL might be dangerous unless done correctly.
The basic rule is actually very simple - You must parameterize what you can, and white-list what you can't.
For more details, read my blog post The do’s and don’ts of dynamic SQL for SQL Server.
Also, since you're moving records from one table to another you should use a transaction, otherwise, if your delete statement fails with an error, the insert statement will not be rolled back, and you will end up with the rows that lives in both databases.
For more information, read Understanding Cross-Database Transactions in SQL Server over on red-gate.
Please note that if the history database is on a different server then the live database, you will need a distributed transaction.
A working example would be something like this:
DECLARE #TableName sysname = 'TableName',
#LineBreak nchar(2) = NCHAR(13) + NCHAR(10),
#Sql nvarchar(4000);
IF EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM [database.live].Information_schema.Tables
WHERE Table_Name = #TableName
)
BEGIN
SET #SQL = 'BEGIN TRANSACTION' + #LineBreak +
'BEGIN TRY' + #LineBreak +
'INSERT INTO [database.history].dbo.' + #TableName + #LineBreak +
'SELECT *' + #LineBreak +
'FROM [database.live].dbo.' + #TableName + #LineBreak +
'DELETE FROM [database.history].dbo.' + #TableName +
'COMMIT TRANSACTION' + #LineBreak +
'END TRY' + #LineBreak +
'BEGIN CATCH' + #LineBreak +
'IF ##TRANCOUNT > 0' + #LineBreak +
' ROLLBACK TRANSACTION' + #LineBreak +
'END CATCH' + #LineBreak
-- When working with dynamic SQL, Print is your best friend.
PRINT #SQL
-- Once you've verified that the SQL looks ok, you can unremark the EXEC statemet.
--EXEC sp_ExecuteSql #SQL
END
Please note, however, that it's considered bad practice to use an insert statement without specifying the columns list, as well as using select *.
To add that to your query, you can query sys.columns to get the columns of the table you want.
I've also noticed that the code in the question doesn't contain a where clause - meaning the entire content of the row will be moved from live database to history database.
If you`re using Dapper that means you're using the queries in the c# code, not in stored procedures. You can add your ProdDb and HistoryDb in your app.config and use it from there.
edit: You can build also different connection strings for both DBs and open whatever connection you want to use in your code.
If your databases are on the same server you can use the SQL Server Replication feature to replicate production DB to history DB.

SQL injection with Entity Framework Database.SqlQuery

In my project I have defined a stored procedure with a example code below:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[Stored]
#ParameterA AS varchar(128),
#ParameterB AS varchar(128),
#ParameterC AS varchar(400)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #query AS Varchar(MAX)
SET #query = 'SELECT *
FROM Table
WHERE A = '''+ #ParameterA + ''
IF #ParameterB = 'B'
BEGIN
SET #query = #query + ' AND C=''' + #ParameterC + ''
END
EXECUTE sp_executesql #query
END
I call this procedure with Entity Framework through the following code:
DBContext.Database.SqlQuery<Object>("Stored",
new SqlParameter("#p0", Param0),
new SqlParameter("#p1", Param1),
new SqlParameter("#p2", Param2)).ToList();
If I call a stored procedure with the string below, I generate a SQL injection:
Param2 = "ABC' ; DROP TABLE Table2"
How can I prevent this with Entity Framework?
You cannot
The underlying SQL procedure is faulty and a security nightmare. There is no way you can repair that on the layer on top of it. You are doing the best you can in EntityFramework, but it's still unsafe. You need to repair the problem (SQL proc) and not apply band aids to the layer using it.
sp_executesql seems to be a good starting point for a procedure that needs to have dynamic SQL and bind parameters.
you are creating a dynamic query, where you are concatenating parameters. this is causing issue.
do not use dynamic query, or validate parameters (if it contains any keywords or characters)
you can also rewrite your query into IF-ELSE structure on basis of parameters, so you do not need dynamic query.

Parameters and SQL Injection asp.net

I used parameters in the whereclause, but what about the variables for this {0}. Do I need to create a parameter for it to prevent sql injection?
("...inner join db1.dbo.table1.id on db2.dbo.table2.id = {0}.dbo.table3.id where name=#name",abc)
var abc = ddl2.SelectedItem.Text;
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#name", ddl1.selectedvalue);
To the best of my knowledge, you can't actually 'paramaterize' database names/table names.
String.Format does not solve SQL injection in this case since it is possible for the user to change ddl2.SelectedItem.Text to whatever they want.
If you need a dynamic value for the database name, I suggest you either keep that value as a const or store it somewhere that you have complete control over/ is never sent or interpreted client side.
I would suggest you to use any ORM (object relational mapping) i.e Entity framework or n-hibernate etc. and use linq to write queries, that will prevent you application from SQL Injection.
Unfortunately, as Abbath already mentioned, this type of construct is not parameterizable. As Abbath mentioned, the best solution is to keep such arguments under your absolute control, but there are times, where such constructs are needed, and it may not be possible to have complete control over them.
For such scenarios, the best recommendation in this case is to escape the arguments. In this case, the DB name represented by {0} on your sample code.
There are two potential mechanisms to achieve this:
a) Create a mechanism that allows you to parameterize the query
Advantage: You can reuse the same solution from any driver (.Net, ODBC, etc.)
Disadvantage: A bit more work. You will not use select directly anymore on this case.
For example (I am including a simple example that has an inner join, just like your code):
CREATE PROC sp_MyQuery( #target_db_name sysname, #name nvarchar(100))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #cmd nvarchar(max)
DECLARE #parameters nvarchar(max)
SELECT #cmd = N'SELECT * FROM msdb.sys.objects inner join '
+ quotename(#target_db_name) + N'.sys.sql_modules
on msdb.sys.objects.object_id = '
+ quotename(#target_db_name) + N'.sys.sql_modules.object_id WHERE name = #name'
print #cmd -- See the command before it is executed.
set #parameters = N'#name nvarchar(100)'
EXEC sp_executesql #cmd, #parameters, #name = #name
END
go
-- Example of usage
DECLARE #target_db_name sysname = 'msdb'
DECLARE #name nvarchar(100) = 'sp_help_operator'
EXEC sp_MyQuery #target_db_name, #name
go
At this point, you can use SqlParameter objects as you would normally do. For example:
sqlcmd.CommandText = #"[dbo].[sp_MyQuery]";
sqlcmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
sqlcmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#target_db_name", ddl0.selectedvalue);
sqlcmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#name", ddl1.selectedvalue);
SqlDataReader reader = sqlcmd.ExecuteReader();
b) Escape the DB name within your CLR code
Advantage: Easier to implement
Disadvantage: App-specific solution, you need to be careful with potential Unicode–DB collation translation issues.
For example (same query as above):
sqlcmd.CommandText = String.Format(#"
SELECT * FROM msdb.sys.objects inner join [{0}].sys.sql_modules on msdb.sys.objects.object_id = [{0}].sys.sql_modules.object_id WHERE name = #name;",
ddl0.selectedvalue.Replace("]", "]]"));
sqlcmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.Text;
sqlcmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#name", ddl1.selectedvalue);
SqlDataReader reader2 = sqlcmd.ExecuteReader();
I typically recommend using solution (a) whenever it is possible, but both solutions should help you protect against SQL injection.
BTW. The following link may also be quite useful: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/raulga/2007/01/04/dynamic-sql-sql-injection/
I hope information helps.
you dont need create parameter for abbc if you use string.format like this
var abc = ddl2.SelectedItem.Text;
string.format("...inner join db1.dbo.table1.id on db2.dbo.table2.id = {0}.dbo.table3.id where name=#name",abc)
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#name", ddl1.selectedvalue);

Preventing SQL injection when using dynamic SQL

I've got a stored procedure that returns data for a grid control. Given a table name, the grid will display data from that table. The user can sort and filter this data. There is also paging logic for large data sets.
The names of the tables that data is pulled from is not known until runtime, so dynamic SQL was used. This works well, but is vulnerable to SQL injection - the tableName, sortExpression and filterExpression variables are generated clientside and passed through to the server.
Below is a simplified version of the procedure:
create procedure ReadTable (
#tableName as varchar(128),
#sortExpression as varchar(128),
#filterExpression as varchar(512)
)
as
begin
declare #SQLString as nvarchar(max) =
'select * from ' + #tableName +
' where ' + #filterExpression +
' order by ' + #sortExpression
exec Sp_executesql #SQLString
end
I'm struggling to find a way to easily prevent SQL injection in this case. I've found a good answer explaining how to check the #tableName is legitamite (How should I pass a table name into a stored proc?), but the approach won't work for the filtering or sort strings.
One way would be perhaps to do some sanitizing server side before the data is passed through to the database - breaking the expressions down into column names and checking them against the known column names of the table.
Would there be an easier way?

Categories