When using the following routes:
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "new_device",
routeTemplate: "api/v1/devices",
defaults: new { controller = "Devices", action = "new_device" }
);
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "devices_list",
routeTemplate: "api/v1/devices",
defaults: new { controller = "Devices", action = "devices_list", httpMethod = new HttpMethodConstraint(HttpMethod.Get) }
);
The controller looks as follows:
public class DevicesController : ApiController
{
[HttpPost]
[ResponseType(typeof(IHttpActionResult))]
[Route("api/v1/devices")]
[ActionName("new_device")]
[ValidateModel]
public IHttpActionResult NewDevice([System.Web.Http.FromBody] Device device )
{
...
}
[HttpGet]
[ResponseType(typeof(IHttpActionResult))]
[Route("api/v1/devices")]
[ActionName("devices_list")]
[ValidateModel]
public List<Device> GetAllDevices()
{
...
}
My expectation would be that the router would find the correct route based on the HttpMethod used since even it's using the same URI it is using a different HttpMethod.
But instead it fails with the following:
"Message": "The requested resource does not support http method 'GET'."
My guess is because it fins a match with the URI and then checks if the method if the same.
Is there a way to achieve using the same URI with different Http Method which is by the way REST guidelines? Am I missing something?
Ok , I check your whole code. I think you are trying to achieve the calls in complicated way.
Following code is for the configuration :
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// Web API configuration and services
// Web API routes
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/v1/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
and follwoing is your controller code :
public class DevicesController : ApiController
{
[HttpPost]
[ResponseType(typeof(IHttpActionResult))]
[ActionName("newDevice")]
public IHttpActionResult NewDevice([System.Web.Http.FromBody] Device device)
{
return null;
}
[HttpGet]
[ResponseType(typeof(IHttpActionResult))]
[ActionName("devices_list")]
public List<Device> GetAllDevices()
{
return null;
}
}
I removed ValidateModel. I think it's your custom attribute or somehow related with built in nuget package.
Anyways, execute the calls with Postman or any HTTP client tool. It should work , as it was working at my end with above mentioned code.
Example Calls:
https://localhost:44370/api/v1/devices/devices_list = > Get.
https://localhost:44370/api/v1/devices/newDevice => Post. Provide body as post call for the object.
I am implementing the backend controller where two http post requests use two independent routes (routea and routeb) are consumed using two different actions:
For example:
http://some_domain/api/work/routea
http://some_domain/api/work/routeb
This is how the controller is configured:
var config = new HttpConfiguration();
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "ControllerAndAction",
routeTemplate: "api/work/{controller}");
Here would be the controller implementation:
[RoutePrefix("api/work")]
public class MyController : ApiController
{
[HttpPost]
[Route("routea")]
public HttpResponseMessage RouteA(HttpRequestMessage request)
{...}
[HttpPost]
[Route("routeb")]
public HttpResponseMessage RouteB()
{...}
}
I cannot seem to start executing the functions. On the other hand, if two of the calls are saved in a separate controller (AController.cs and BController.cs for instance) - everything works. I need to have both routes within the same controller class. What is going wrong here?
If you are using a such construction to define base route configuration then you can use your "routea" and "routeb" as controller's names only .
routeTemplate: "api/work/{controller}");
try this instead:
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
Everything should be fine in this case with your controller's implementation.
it might have duplicate but i didn't find right solution,
My web api,
public class SampleController : ApiController
{
public string Get(int id)
{
return "value";
}
public string hello(int id)
{
return "value";
}
}
my webapiconfig,
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
my problem is
When i call http://localhost:1234/api/Sample/5 it's hitting Get(int id) but how can i call method 2 i.e hello(int id) ?? what needs to be changed and what's the best way to handle these kind of scenarios ??
TLDR:
If you want to reference individual actions in your Web API then change your routing to this:
routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
Then you can access your action like this: localhost/api/{controller}/{action}/. Look here for further information, especially "Routing by Action Name".
Orig:
You seem to expect the same behaviour as with MVC Controllers. The Standard-Routing for MVC-Controller is this:
routeTemplate: "{controller}/{action}/{id}"
This corresponds to the name of the controller, the method which is to be used and some form of input. ApiControllers Route differently:
routeTemplate: "staticPart/{controller}/{id}"
As you can see there is only a reference to the individual controller and the input, as well as the "staticPart" which normally is something like /api/
The Idea is that you use a RESTful approach, connecting methods with different types of http methods (eg. DELETE, GET, POST, PUSH and PUT)
The Get Method in your example is a special because through the name "Get" you have told the compiler that this method corresponds with HTTP-GET.
So to get to your question: Either you change your Routing to that of MVC-Controller. So that you reference individual actions in your requests or you use different HTTP-Methods. Or you set routes indivdually as shown by MaxB
You can find an official overview on Web API routing here There you'll find examples on all possibilities.
I'm not sure if I got your problem right, but if I did:
You should specify the route for the function not in its name, but in some other way. From my little experience with the topic, that's how I do it:
[HttpGet]
[Route("SystemInfo")] // That's the name of the route you will call
public IHttpActionResult SystemInfo()
{
return Ok();
}
Consider checking this out.
So, considering your question, it would be like so:
[Route("Get")]
public string Get(int id)
{
return "value";
}
[Route("hello")]
public string hello(int id)
{
return "value";
}
I have been scratching my head for a whole day since I cannot figure out what is wrong in my code.
First, I have a working controller as this one:
namespace MyProject.Controllers {
[RoutePrefix("api/Account")]
public class AccountController : ApiController {
[AllowAnonymous]
[Route("Register")]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> Register(AccountModel model) {
...
return Ok();
}
}
}
However, when I add a new controller and introduce a new route, problem arises.
The new controller is as follows:
namespace MyProject.Controllers {
[RoutePrefix("api/Admin")]
public class AdminController : ApiController {
[AllowAnonymous]
[Route("Encrypt")]
public IHttpActionResult Encrypt(string clientSecret) {
...
return Ok();
}
}
}
Then I make the request via Postman like this:
Unfortunately, an error is returned:
{
"message": "No HTTP resource was found that matches the request URI 'http://localhost/api/admin/encrypt'."
}
I am using the default route mapping configuration defined in WebApiConfig.cs:
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
Can anyone shed some light on it?
UPDATE
If I send the POST request in this way, I can get the Ok() response successfully.
I have a question now. Why can I only pass the parameter via the URL but not with a form object?
To call with the parameter, include parameter in route attribute and add POST verb as follows:
[Route("Encrypt/{clientSecret}")]
[HttpPost]
public IHttpActionResult Encrypt(string clientSecret) {
...
return Ok();
}
Then call as follows:
http://localhost/api/admin/encrypt/123456
However convention for post methods is without the parameter as follows:
[Route("Encrypt")]
[HttpPost]
public IHttpActionResult Encrypt() {
...
return Ok();
}
}
Then call as follows:
http://localhost/api/admin/encrypt
If you do not want to add the POST verb, you can prefix the methods with the POST verb as follows:
public IHttpActionResult PostEncrypt(string clientSecret)
public IHttpActionResult PostEncrypt()
I suggest the slight change in your route definition:
api/{controller}/{action}/{id}
The reason, imo, is that Web api actions default to the standard accept verbs.
Then you can name your api action methods anyhow, only decorate them with the relevant accept attribute.
I keep getting this error when I try to have 2 "Get" methods
Multiple actions were found that match the request: webapi
I been looking around at the other similar questions about this on stack but I don't get it.
I have 2 different names and using the "HttpGet" attribute
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage Summary(MyVm vm)
{
return null;
}
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage FullDetails()
{
return null;
}
Your route map is probably something like this in WebApiConfig.cs:
routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "API Default",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional });
But in order to have multiple actions with the same http method you need to provide webapi with more information via the route like so:
routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "API Default",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional });
Notice that the routeTemplate now includes an action. Lots more info here: http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/web-api-routing-and-actions/routing-in-aspnet-web-api
Update:
Alright, now that I think I understand what you are after here is another take at this:
Perhaps you don't need the action url parameter and should describe the contents that you are after in another way. Since you are saying that the methods are returning data from the same entity then just let the parameters do the describing for you.
For example your two methods could be turned into:
public HttpResponseMessage Get()
{
return null;
}
public HttpResponseMessage Get(MyVm vm)
{
return null;
}
What kind of data are you passing in the MyVm object? If you are able to just pass variables through the URI, I would suggest going that route. Otherwise, you'll need to send the object in the body of the request and that isn't very HTTP of you when doing a GET (it works though, just use [FromBody] infront of MyVm).
Hopefully this illustrates that you can have multiple GET methods in a single controller without using the action name or even the [HttpGet] attribute.
Update as of Web API 2.
With this API config in your WebApiConfig.cs file:
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
//// Web API routes
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes(); //Don't miss this
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
You can route our controller like this:
[Route("api/ControllerName/Summary")]
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage Summary(MyVm vm)
{
return null;
}
[Route("api/ControllerName/FullDetails")]
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage FullDetails()
{
return null;
}
Where ControllerName is the name of your controller (without "controller"). This will allow you to get each action with the route detailed above.
For further reading: http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/web-api-routing-and-actions/attribute-routing-in-web-api-2
In Web API (by default) methods are chosen based on a combination of HTTP method and route values.
MyVm looks like a complex object, read by formatter from the body so you have two identical methods in terms of route data (since neither of them has any parameters from the route) - which makes it impossible for the dispatcher (IHttpActionSelector) to match the appropriate one.
You need to differ them by either querystring or route parameter to resolve ambiguity.
After a lot of searching the web and trying to find the most suitable form for routing map
if have found the following
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute("DefaultApiWithId", "Api/{controller}/{id}", new { id =RouteParameter.Optional }, new { id = #"\d+" });
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute("DefaultApiWithAction", "Api/{controller}/{action}");
These mapping applying to both action name mapping and basic http convention (GET,POST,PUT,DELETE)
This is the answer for everyone who knows everything is correct and has checked 50 times.....
Make sure you are not repeatedly looking at RouteConfig.cs.
The file you want to edit is named WebApiConfig.cs
Also, it should probably look exactly like this:
using System.Web.Http;
namespace My.Epic.Website
{
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
// api/Country/WithStates
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "ControllerAndActionOnly",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}",
defaults: new { },
constraints: new { action = #"^[a-zA-Z]+([\s][a-zA-Z]+)*$" });
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultActionApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
}
}
I could have saved myself about 3 hours.
It might be possible that your webmethods are being resolved to the same url. Have a look at the following link :-
http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/web-api-routing-and-actions/routing-in-aspnet-web-api
So, you might need to add your methodname to your routing table.
Without using actions the options would be:
move one of the methods to a different controller, so that they don't clash.
use just one method that takes the param, and if it's null call the other method from your code.
This solution worked for me.
Please place Route2 first in WebApiConfig. Also Add HttpGet and HttpPost before each method and include controller name and method name in the url.
WebApiConfig =>
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "MapByAction",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}", defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional });
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional });
Controller =>
public class ValuesController : ApiController
{
[HttpPost]
public string GetCustomer([FromBody] RequestModel req)
{
return "Customer";
}
[HttpPost]
public string GetCustomerList([FromBody] RequestModel req)
{
return "Customer List";
}
}
Url =>
http://localhost:7050/api/Values/GetCustomer
http://localhost:7050/api/Values/GetCustomerList
I found that that when I have two Get methods, one parameterless and one with a complex type as a parameter that I got the same error. I solved this by adding a dummy parameter of type int, named Id, as my first parameter, followed by my complex type parameter. I then added the complex type parameter to the route template. The following worked for me.
First get:
public IEnumerable<SearchItem> Get()
{
...
}
Second get:
public IEnumerable<SearchItem> Get(int id, [FromUri] List<string> layers)
{
...
}
WebApiConfig:
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}/{layers}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional, layers RouteParameter.Optional }
);
It is possible due to using MVC controller instead of Web API controller.
Check the namespace in Web API controller it should be as following
using System.Net;
using System.Net.Http;
using System.Web.Http;
If the namespace are as following then it is give above error in web api controller method calling
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Mvc;
Please check you have two methods which has the different name and same parameters.
If so please delete any of the method and try.
I've stumbled upon this problem while trying to augment my WebAPI controllers with extra actions.
Assume you would have
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
return this.Repository.GetAll();
}
[HttpGet]
public void ReSeed()
{
// Your custom action here
}
There are now two methods that satisfy the request for /api/controller which triggers the problem described by TS.
I didn't want to add "dummy" parameters to my additional actions so I looked into default actions and came up with:
[ActionName("builtin")]
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
return this.Repository.GetAll();
}
for the first method in combination with the "dual" route binding:
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { action = "builtin", id = RouteParameter.Optional },
constraints: new { id = #"\d+" });
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "CustomActionApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}");
Note that even though there is no "action" parameter in the first route template apparently you can still configure a default action allowing us to separate the routing of the "normal" WebAPI calls and the calls to the extra action.
In my Case Everything was right
1) Web Config was configured properly
2) Route prefix and Route attributes were proper
Still i was getting the error. In my Case "Route" attribute (by pressing F12) was point to System.Web.MVc but not System.Web.Http which caused the issue.
You can add [Route("api/[controller]/[action]")] to your controller class.
[Route("api/[controller]/[action]")]
[ApiController]
public class MySuperController : ControllerBase
{
...
}
I know it is an old question, but sometimes, when you use service resources like from AngularJS to connect to WebAPI, make sure you are using the correct route, other wise this error happens.
Make sure you do NOT decorate your Controller methods for the default GET|PUT|POST|DELETE actions with [HttpPost/Put/Get/Delete] attribute. I had added this attibute to my vanilla Post controller action and it caused a 404.
Hope this helps someone as it can be very frustrating and bring progress to a halt.
For example => TestController
[HttpGet]
public string TestMethod(int arg0)
{
return "";
}
[HttpGet]
public string TestMethod2(string arg0)
{
return "";
}
[HttpGet]
public string TestMethod3(int arg0,string arg1)
{
return "";
}
If you can only change WebApiConfig.cs file.
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/",
defaults: null
);
Thats it :)
And Result :
Have you tried like:
[HttpGet("Summary")]
public HttpResponseMessage Summary(MyVm vm)
{
return null;
}
[HttpGet("FullDetails")]
public HttpResponseMessage FullDetails()
{
return null;
}