I have inherited an existing .Net/angularJS project. We have a need moving forward to allow customization per client, while still maintaining synchronization through version control (in this case, git).
I'm not a .Net developer--my .Net experience is limited to writing a service a couple of years ago, starting the BrowserStack tests for the project, and the occasional foray for code review type activities. I'm primarily a Flash/Flex developer with a fair amount of ASP Classic and some PHP experience.
My preliminary research seems to indicate that I can do what I need to do with a git subtree, but I need to find where the seams should be to separate out the custom stuff from the shared code. Right now, the HTML and JS are in the same directory as the web services. My first order of business will be to separate those out, but I don't completely understand
Why everything's all in one place to begin with
What the implications are of moving things (project settings, paths, etc.)
When I wrote the service way back, I do remember that we had to scrap the service because the server we had the site on didn't support that version of .Net and it wouldn't work across domains so I could host the service on a server where it would work. I know that things have changed and there's now a way to allow that, but I figure that's the sort of problem I should be looking to avoid as I do this.
I figure I can't be the first person needing to make this kind of separation in a project I think started from the monolithic web project template, but because of a short deadline and a lack of knowledge of .Net, I'd feel better if someone could point me in the right direction or at least alert me to some of the gotchas I should plan to encounter.
Are you Trying to decouple the Projects. If so than this might be a good help.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/439688/Creating-ASP-NET-application-with-n-tier-architect
One of my recent project was almost the same that you mentioned above, So I ended up scrapping the old version and Create a brand new Project and Decoupled the related stuffs in the solution.
The best way of understanding stuff is to make sure you seperate the Client Side (Javascript/Htmls/CSS) and Server Side (EF/SP Calls/DTOs etc) by creating different project to the same solution.
Hope this Helps.
So I kept digging, and I finally found a pair of tutorials that address exactly this issue.
Creating an empty ASP.Net Project Powered by Angular JS Using Visual Studio
AngularJS Consuming ASP.NET Web API RESTful Services
In a nutshell, you copy the client's url from the properties panel to the service properties panel and add '/api' to the end of the URL and allow VS to create a virtual directory for you.
Now for my next trick, figuring out how to publish it...
Related
We have an active fully developed ASP.NET web application which allows users to create/update data for various screens/modules.
Now, There is a requirement to build a Web API that will automate the data creation for a particular module alone.
This API will receive data from source system and saves the posted data to our application database
(eventually removing the front-end option to create)
The Web Solution has it's own Business & Data Layer included in the solution and we are looking at ways to re-use the layers
in the API as well.
One way I can think of is to refer the Business layer as a dll in the Web API but this would
provide access to other classes & methods in the BL which is not required at this point
Can anyone please suggest what is the right approach?
splitting up a solution into multiple projects is not a bad thing.
One project for your BLL, another for your DAL is a good approach and I would definitely recommend going with that.
Yes, it does mean that if you add a reference to the BLL project into the API then yes, the API will have access to more than it needs for now, but that is not really an issue. How much you use is up to you.
Plus, if you start using the API you will probably find that more and more code will naturally converge towards that so having access to everything will make life easier, long term.
You could also break out the specific bit of code you are interested in into an extra project / dll and reference that in the API, if you see value in that, but I don't think that's particularly useful.
Another thing that I highly recommend is to have a separate project for your model classes, it makes things much easier when it comes to sharing them.
I have a specific case and I want to know the best practice way to handle it.
I make a specific .NET framework (web application). This web application acts like a platform or framework to many other web applications through the following methodology :
We create our dependent web applications (classes for the project business, rdlc reports) in a separate solutions then build them.
After that we add references to the resulted dll in the framework.
And create set of user controls (one for each dependent web application) and put them in a folder in the framework it self.
It works fine but any modification to a specific user control or any modification to any one of the dependent web applications. We have to add the references again and publish the whole framework !!
What I want to do is make those different web applications and the framework loosely coupled. So I could publish the framework one and only one and any modifications to the user controls or the different web applications just publish the updated part rather than the whole framework .
How to refactor my code so I can do this?
The most important thing is :
Never publish the whole framework if the change in any dependent application, just publish the updated part belongs to this application .
If loose coupling is what you are after, develop your "framework(web application)" to function as a WCF web service. Your client applications will pass requests to your web services and receive standard responses in the form of predefined objects.
If you take this route, I recommend that you implement an additional step: Do not use the objects passed to your client applications directly in your client code. Instead, create versions of these web service objects local to each client application and upon receiving your web service response objects, map them to their local counterparts. I tend to implement this with a facade project in my client solution. The facade handles all calls to my various web services, and does the mapping between client and service objects automatically with each call. It is very convenient.
The reason for this is that the day that you decide to modify the objects that your web service serves, you only have to change the mapping algorithms in your client applications... the internal code of each client solution remains unchanged. Do not underestimate how much work this can save you!
Developing WCF web services is quite a large subject. If you are interested, a book that I recommend is Programming WCF Services. It offers a pretty good introduction to WCF development for those who come from a .NET background.
I totally agree with levib, but I also have some tips:
As an alternative to WCF (with its crazy configuration needs), I would recommend ServiceStack. Like WCF it lets you receive requests and return responses in the form of predefined objects, but with NO code generation and minimal configuration. It supports all kinds of response formats, such as JSON, XML, JSV and CSV. This makes it much easier to consume from f.ex. JavaScript and even mobile apps. It even has binaries for MonoTouch and Mono for Android! It is also highly testable and blazing fast!
A great tool for the mapping part of your code is AutoMapper, it lets you set up all your mappings in a single place and map from one object type to another by calling a simple method.
Check them out! :)
Decades of experience says: avoid the framework and you won't have a problem to solve.
Frameworks evolve like cancer. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and a good portion of those good intentions are embodied in a colossal tumour of a framework all in the name of potential re-use that never really happens.
Get some experience and knowledge when it comes to OO and design, and you'll find endless solutions to your technical problem, such as facades, and mementos, and what have you, but they are not solutions to your real problem.
Another thing, if you are using MS technology, don't bother with anything beyond what .NET offers. Stick with what the MS gods offer because as soon as you digress and become committed to some inhouse framework, your days are numbered.
I just got a project to be build up from scratch. Its front end will ASP.Net and Backend is SQL 2008. The requirement is, the architecture of the app should be such so that we can have access to app from any computers(desktop, laptop, netbooks) as handheld devices as well like smartphones, PDA's, Tablets. Also it should be plugable in nature like FB and orkut. That is in future if the client needs to attach games or third party applications, then it should be plugged in without rewriting the entire thing again. Also client needs the entire web ajaxified either using the toolkits or JQuery.
I have prior experience of ASP.Net webforms applications with tiered arcitecture. So this time keeping his all needs, i am thinking of a web app with WCF Service. But i have no idea or experience about the pluggable architecture with SOA and MVC (all three). It seems if I implement all the stuffs, it will going to be a mamoth of codes. For pluggable arch I googled and found MEF on codeplex. So finally I came up with the following things :
ASP.Net MVC
MEF
JQuery
WCF
RESTful with AJAX
XML
Guys, i really need your help, I am unable to think how to place all these stuffs together. Or is there any other best alternative you can suggest for.
Also, there is one more requirement by the client is that he want the loose coupled code, that's reason i chosen MVC, the aspx page can only have the controls and required HTML, validation and other codes should be done in the Business Layer of the app.
it will be great help.
You should take a look at Orchard: it's an ASP.Net MVC CMS system that is very pluguable. You can add a lot of functionnalities through modules, and there are a lot of modules already implemented and accessible.
Even if you do not end up using Orchard itself, taking a good look at its architecture should be a very good starting point for your app, as Orchard responds to a lot of the same requirements you have, and as it is an open source project, you can get as much inspiration from it as you want.
I'm maintaining an application which currently is just a web service (built with WCF) and a database backend. The web service is built in layers with a linq-to-sql data access part with core functionality in an own assembly and on top of that the web service assembly which contains the WCF code. The core assembly also handles all business logic rules (very few actually).
The customer now wants a Web interface for the application instead of just accessing it through other applications which are consuming the web service. I'm quite lost on modern web application design, so I would like some advice on what architecture and frameworks to use for the web application. The web application will be using the same core assembly with business rules and the linq-to-sql data access layer as the web service.
Some concepts I've thought about are:
ASP.NET MVC (or MVC-2)
Webforms
AJAX controls - possibly leting the AJAX controls access the existing web service through JSON.
Are there any more concepts I should look into? Which one is the best for a fresh project?
The development tools are Visual Studio 2008 Team Edition for Developers targeting .NET 3.5. An upgrade to Visual Studio 2010 Premium (or maybe even Ultimate) is possible if it gives any benefits.
Definitely dig into ASP.NET MVC2.
All of our projects are now being developed using ASP.NET MVC2. It's not just highly scalable. It's highly testable as well. Which leads to way better maintainable apps in the long term.
WebForms vs. MVC2 points - (speaking out of experience):
Scalability:
In our company we had a lot of applications using WebForms which then were updated and changed by us as needed by our customers.
I think your customer will be requesting more changes on the application in near future. Making calls to other services, and maybe you'll have to rework parts of the final product to match their wishes.
And with the upcoming Cloud Computing and the Windows Azure platform you'll probably need to keep up with your code.
ASP.NET MVC absolutely supports the concept of being able to scale up your application any time you want.
I remember one of our customers walking up on me asking me for an extension for their app (they have a member management system) and the feature would contain something like a link to export the current view as a csv file so they could do office stuff with it (mostly serial letters).
It wasn't really a big problem setting that feature up. (took around 2 hours including writing tests) - let's go to tests:
Testability:
Using WebForms we didn't really have much interest writing tests because it was a pure pain to do so.
I remember writing some tests to have at least some proofs but let's drop that topic.. (:p)
We had tests for our custom classes but we couldn't really test all the EventHandlers within the WebForms.
Our CodeBase is way cleaner and saver to use thanks to this testable environment. I just check out some of the code, modify it, run all the tests and: Oh, it broke on strange behavior! - Let's fix that again. Earlier, I remember sitting with my co-worker debugging and trying to find those bugs for hours.
With ASP.NET MVC2 we are now lacking tests!
We ask all kinds of people (even the non-Web ones) to provide test-cases we could feed into our TestSuite.
And yeah, there are some AJAX-Controls too:
AJAXability:
You asked about AJAX Controls and in conjunction with ASP.NET MVC I highly recommend you to check out Telerik ASP.NET MVC UI Controls.
If that isn't something for you, we also make extensive use of jQuery and jQuery UI
With ASP.NET MVC and the HTML Views, those libraries aren't just a pleasure to use, they just look amazingly beautiful.
There is no random-html-tag-id-value autogeneration anymore!
But what I like most is: You can finally really re-use your code again.
There is so much more to those frameworks than just that, there is the T4 templating system. Auto-Scaffolding for your ViewModels / DomainModels with the Html.EditorFor() method and of course there is a great and easy way to use the IoC and DI paradigms.
Assuming that you have asked the question with mostly .NET Framework related tags, you'll probably stick with it.
Just to keep the post complete, there are also other frameworks that are just as good (or even better):
Ruby on Rails
Django
CakePHP
And many many more!
There's also DynamicData which may be appropriate if you need simple CRUD access to your data.
The Web Service Software Factory (WSSF) might come in handy in your situation.
This will allow you to define your contracts (XML entity returned (if XML you choose), etc.) while designing the server/client communication using WCF (or standard Web Service communication protocol).
WSSF favors either ASP.NET MVC or ASP.NET MVP. A simple example of the MVP architecture is shown here, plus this article.
As for me, I often come with a hybrid-like architecture using a bit of both MVC and MVP, as both have different strong points which combined together fill each other's improvement points.
I'd also recommend looking into Silverlight.
http://www.silverlight.net/learn/
Just my opinion to use MVC on Client sites and WebForms inside administration pages(site)
I'm working on a project that needs to produce an application that runs both as a stand-alone application and a web application. We're considering using the User Interface Process (UIP) Application Block that available on the Microsoft Patterns & Practices web site.
The application block claims it can make this possible:
This block is a reusable code
component that builds on the
capabilities of the Microsoft .NET
Framework to help you create both Web
Forms- and Windows Forms-based
applications.
Before we commit too much time to further investigation I'm wondering if anyone has had experience with using the UIP Application Block to create a Web-Forms- and a Windows Forms-based applications. How successful were you in separating the business logic from the user interface logic when using UIP?
I'm currently working on a project with the UIP. I won't say it's bad because I haven't really invested more than a day on it. But let me express one feeling: It's Saturday, my friends are hanging out drinking beers. I'm at the office, struggling to use it and reading around 50 pages of documentation. The web.config for the app is huge due to the amount of nodes it is using. I'm really, really sad and even I love Microsoft and programming because thanks to them I have a job to pay the rent... I am really frustrated, right now. And I'm usually a very happy guy.
I would rather use Aspnet MVC, cleaner, newer and built with the community input.
Hope this helps.
I used the UIP to create an application to report insurance claims a few years ago. I found that it added complexity without any real benefit.
The UIP is not intended to keep your business logic and UI seperate. It's goal is to allow you to re-use your UI logic for both asp.net and winforms. This doesn't work out very well in practice because desktop apps and web apps are two completely different animals.
I also experienced quite a few bugs related to session state on the asp.net side (I can't remember the details, sorry). I eventually got sick of it stripped out all the UIP related code from the web app. After I did this it made the code much easier to understand and debug.
If your looking for a way to keep your UI separate from your business logic then you should check out CSLA.net.
The UIP really sucked, I had a horrible experience using it. If you want a good example of the kind of architecture you are after download the Northwind Starter Kit.
It shows using different back ends/DB access techniques (SQL Server/Access/NHibernate) and different front ends (ASP.NET MVC/Monorail/Windows Forms/WPF).
It also has an associated book- "Architecting Applications for the Enterprise"