Sounds a bit cluttered, but basically I have a databound repeater. On the ASP side, I have this:
<asp:Label ID="Label2" runat="server" Text='<%#Eval("uMessage") %>'></asp:Label>
I'm using the same template for 4 different datasets, and for 2 of them this should be a hyperlink and for the other 2 it shouldn't. So, I'm guessing you have to add a hyperlink programmatically in the code-behind? Has anyone ever done something like this?
Easiest way without all kinds of code-behind and therefor less code fragmentation, I would say you need a property that is set based on your condition prior to data binding.
protected bool LinkVisible { get; set; }
Then you just do this:
<asp:Label ID="Label2" runat="server" Text='<%#Eval("uMessage") %>' Visible="<%# !LinkVisible %>"></asp:Label>
<asp:HyperLink ID="Link" runat="server" Visible="<%# LinkVisible %>" ><%#Eval("uMessage") %></asp:HyperLink>
This sets the Visible for either the Label or the HyperLink. Visible false means it won't even get rendered. In your markup you can see that there will be a label or a hyperlink and no special things popup from the code behind.
You don't need to add the property LinkVisible, but can do the condition there too.
yes it is possible in code behind on DataItem bound
if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow)
{
Label lbl = (Label)e.Row.FindControl("Label2");
if (lbl.Text == "your condition")
{
HyperLink yourLink = (HyperLink)e.Row.FindControl("yourID");
yourLink.enabled = false;
}
}
Related
I have a nested asp repeater which is displaying all my items correctly. I have another div within the ItemTemplate of each repeater which submits content to my code behind.
<asp:Repeater runat="server" id="repeaterNote" OnItemDataBound="repeaterNote_ItemDataBound">
<ItemTemplate>
<div id="note" class="staff"><p><%# Eval("Content") %></p><ul>
<li><%# Eval("AddedDate") %></li><li>20:29</li>
<li><%# Eval("AddedByName") %></li><li>
Add comment</li></ul>
<div id="addComment<%# Eval("NoteID") %>" class="staff" style="display:none">
<asp:TextBox ID="notecommenttext" runat="server" rows="4"> </asp:TextBox>
<asp:Button ID="Button" runat="server" Text="Add" CommandArgument='<%# Eval("NoteID") %>' OnCommand="Add_Comment" />
</div>
</div>
When I submit the button I want to retrieve the content within the textbook "notecommenttext". There doesn't seem to be an easy way to do this. I have tried to set the ID of the textbook to the unique "NoteID" but it appears that cannot be done.
string uniqueNoteID = e.CommandArgument.ToString();
int parent = int.Parse(uniqueNoteID);
TextBox txtName = new TextBox();
foreach(RepeaterItem noteItem in repeaterNote.Items)
{
if (noteItem.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || noteItem.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem)
{
Notes rin = (Notes)noteItem.DataItem;
if (rin.RelativeNoteId == parent)
{
txtName = (TextBox)noteItem.FindControl("notecommenttext");
}
}
}
The snippet above is from the button callback "Add_Comment", repeaterNote is my top level Repeater id. It seems to have the correct number of RepeaterItems but the DataItem property is always null. I have added an inner foreach loop to iterate over my nested repeater. Again, this correctly identifies only one of the top level repeaters has a nested repeater element, but the DataItem is still null.
Any suggestions on how I can access the content from within the textbook of each repeater?
I think instead of setting OnCommand in your button, you should set OnItemCommand in your repeater to your event handler and just set the CommandName property in your button to an easily identifiable string. Then in the repeater's OnItemCommand event handler, you do a Select Case on e.CommandName, and if it's that button's CommandName that you set, you can use e.Item.FindControl("notecommenttext") to get your textbox control. Then get its content. When a control is in a repeater its ID gets a bunch of stuff appended to it so it is hard to find outside of a repeater event like ItemCommand.
I think your problem is that you are doing the Binding mecanism in your Page_Load() method without testing if (!IsPostback) That's why you dont find the result you want. Don't forget to set EnableViewState="False"
So you should move your Binding mecanism in Page_LoadComplete() method if you are in aspx page or add in your page load
if(!IsPostback)
{
//your binding mecanism
}
I have the need to allow a user to "tab through" making edits on a gridview. There will be one editable column in the row data. The user should be able to hit tab and go to the next row to edit said column.
I have not found any easy method to accomplish this task. I found a way to programmatically put a gridview into edit mode, but in testing the code below it works for only 1 row at a time.
reviewTransferGV.EditIndex = 0;
reviewTransferGV.Rows[0].RowState = DataControlRowState.Edit;
reviewTransferGV.EditIndex = 1;
reviewTransferGV.Rows[1].RowState = DataControlRowState.Edit;
reviewTransferGV.DataBind();
I did a workaround by creating a property in the page:
protected bool IsEditMode
{
get { return this.EditMode; }
set { this.EditMode = value; }
}
Then in the GridView I have the controls for view and edit mode inside an item template. Setting the visibility based on the property value:
<asp:TemplateField SortExpression="Status" HeaderText="Status">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:Label Id="lblStatus" Text='<%# Eval("Status") %>' Visible='<%# !IsEditMode %>' runat="server" />
<asp:TextBox ID="txtStatus" Text='<%# Eval("Status") %>' Visible='<%# IsEditMode %>' runat="server" />
</ItemTemplate>
This works for editing the whole gridview. You'll probably need to make a few modifications to make it work for individual rows.
I don't believe it is possible for a GridView to have multiple rows in edit mode simultaneously. If you want to edit multiple rows, you will need to roll your own mechanism to do so.
Another point is how to save the results to the DataBase.
While in regular use, we simple call the update command who does the work, in ItemTemplate there are now update button.
So i add a button outside the GridView and in the handler i call the UpdateRow method manually for each row.
I've been working for a long time with GridViews and DetailsViews, but yesterday I've come across a new scenario, which I quite do not understand.
I have a GridView with ImageButton (CommandName="Insert") which will change the mode of the DetailsView to Insert. Afterwards I'll look for a DropDownList inside that DetailsView and add some items dynamically. Works fine, but one first the first time I press that ImageButton. If I click on "Cancel" in the DetailsView and press the ImageButton again, the .FindControl() Method returns null. What life cycle problem am I facing here?
I've created this sample: (To make it run in your Visual Studio, just bind a DataSource to the DetailsView, otherwise it will not be rendered)
Markup:
<asp:GridView ID="gvCategory" runat="server" OnRowCommand="gvCategory_RowCommand">
<Columns>
</Columns>
<EmptyDataTemplate>
<asp:ImageButton ImageUrl="~/images/add.png" ID="ibAdd" runat="server" CommandName="Insert" />
</EmptyDataTemplate>
</asp:GridView>
<asp:DetailsView ID="dvCategory" runat="server" Width="150px" AutoGenerateRows="false"
AutoGenerateInsertButton="True" DataSourceID="LinqDataSource1">
<Fields>
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="foo">
<InsertItemTemplate>
<asp:DropDownList ID="ddlCategory" runat="server" Width="150"></asp:DropDownList>
</InsertItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Fields>
</asp:DetailsView><asp:LinqDataSource ID="LinqDataSource1" runat="server"
ContextTypeName="WebApplication1.DataClasses1DataContext"
TableName="Categories"></asp:LinqDataSource>
Codebehind:
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (!Page.IsPostBack)
{
this.gvCategory.DataBind();
}
}
protected void gvCategory_RowCommand(object sender, GridViewCommandEventArgs e)
{
if (e.CommandName == "Insert")
{
this.dvCategory.ChangeMode(DetailsViewMode.Insert);
DropDownList _ddlCat = (DropDownList)this.dvCategory.FindControl("ddlCategory");
if (_ddlCat != null)
{
_ddlCat.Items.Clear();
_ddlCat.Items.Add(new ListItem() { Text = "-- empty --", Value = "-1" });
}
}
}
I have also tried using a ItemTemplate, and not a InsertItemTemplate, but this results in the same. After using the ChangeMode-Method the DetailsView.CurrentMode == InsertMode. The only thing I can think of is, that the markup is already generated for the ItemTemplate and changing the Mode to InsertMode can't affect the rendered markup, or something like this.
Does anybody have a solution to this? =)
I think you are on the right track. It's hard to tell without seeing all of the code, but basically any time you change the rendering mode of a row in a repeater-type control you need to rebind it so that it's re-rendered. The fact that FindControl is returning NULL means only one thing: THE CONTROL IS NOT THERE. Which means it was not rendered. You can verify this by looking at the control hierarchy.
So, in your handler for Cancel are you rebinding?
I have a Customer class with a string property comments and I am trying to bind it like this:
<asp:TextBox ID="txtComments"
runat="server"
TextMode="MultiLine" Text=<%=customer.Comments %>>
</asp:TextBox>
However, it gives me the error:
Server tags cannot contain <% ... %> constructs.
I also have a method in the class called GetCreatedDate and in the aspx page, I am doing
<%=GetCreatedDate()%> and <%GetCreatedDate();%>. What is the difference?
Alternatively you can set the value in the Page_Load event of the code behind file:
txtComments.Text = customer.Comments;
you should use "<%# %>" for data binding
<asp:TextBox ID="txtComments"
runat="server"
TextMode="MultiLine" Text="<%# customer.Comments %>">
</asp:TextBox>
Try this instead.
<asp:TextBox ID="txtComments"
runat="server"
TextMode="MultiLine" Text=<%# customer.Comments %>>
</asp:TextBox>
Notice the = to #
Use the DataBinding syntax as stated, <%# customer.Comments %>. This syntax is only evaluated when the TextBox is databound. You would usually use it in a DataBound list. In this case you need to databind the control manually. Override the page's OnDataBinding method and call txtComments.DataBind();
The databinding syntax is the only way to declaratively set ServerControl properties from the aspx page. The Response.Write of the other syntax happens at a time that the ServerControl properties cannot be accessed. If the control is not inside a databound control, you have to databind it.
If you were looking to go all declarative in your page, you don't gain to much using this method because you still need to write code in the code behind.
An alternative if you want to use the TextBox on its own without a parent DataBound control would be to subclass the TextBox, add an AutoBind property, and in the subclassed control call its DataBind method if it is true. That would let you bind the values without writing databinding code in the code behind.
You could also add the TextBox and other form controls to a FormView control and bind it to your object. You can still use the DataBinding syntax in that case.
try this
<asp:TextBox ID="txtComments"
runat="server"
TextMode="MultiLine" Text='<%# customer.Comments %>'>
</asp:TextBox>
I'm setting up a User Control driven by a XML configuration. It is easier to explain by example. Take a look at the following configuration snippet:
<node>
<text lbl="Text:"/>
<checkbox lbl="Check me:" checked="true"/>
</node>
What I'm trying to achieve to translate that snippet into a single text box and a checkbox control. Of course, had the snippet contained more nodes more controls would be generated automatically.
Give the iterative nature of the task, I have chosen to use Repeater. Within it I have placed two (well more, see bellow) Controls, one CheckBox and one Editbox. In order to choose which control get activate, I used an inline switch command, checking the name of the current configuration node.
Sadly, that doesn't work. The problem lies in the fact that the switch is being run during rendering time, long after data binding had happened. That alone would not be a problem, was not for the fact that a configuration node might offer the needed info to data bind. Consider what would happen if the check box control will try to bind to the text node in the snippet above, desperately looking for it's "checked" attribute.
Any ideas how to make this possible?
Thanks,
Boaz
Here is my current code:
Here is my code (which runs on a more complex syntax than the one above):
<asp:Repeater ID="settingRepeater" runat="server">
<ItemTemplate>
<%
switch (((XmlNode)Page.GetDataItem()).LocalName)
{
case "text":
%>
<asp:Label ID="settingsLabel" CssClass="editlabel" Text='<%# XPath("#lbl") %>' runat="server" />
<asp:TextBox ID="settingsLabelText" Text='<%# SettingsNode.SelectSingleNode(XPath("#xpath").ToString()).InnerText %>'
runat="server" AutoPostBack="true" Columns='<%# XmlUtils.OptReadInt((XmlNode)Page.GetDataItem(),"#width",20) %>'
/>
<% break;
case "checkbox":
%>
<asp:CheckBox ID="settingsCheckBox" Text='<%# XPath("#lbl") %>' runat="server"
Checked='<%# ((XmlElement)SettingsNode.SelectSingleNode(XPath("#xpath").ToString())).HasAttribute(XPath("#att").ToString()) %>'
/>
<% break;
} %>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:Repeater>
One weekend later, here is what I came with as a solution. My main goal was to find something that will both work and allow you to keep specifying the exact content of the Item Template in markup. Doing things from code would work but can still be cumbersome.
The code should be straight forward to follow, but the gist of the matter lies in two parts.
The first is the usage of the Repeater item created event to filter out unwanted parts of the template.
The second is to store decisions made in ViewState in order to recreate the page during post back. The later is crucial as you'll notice that I used the Item.DataItem . During post backs, control recreation happens much earlier in the page life cycle. When the ItemCreate fires, the DataItem is null.
Here is my solution:
Control markup
<asp:Repeater ID="settingRepeater" runat="server"
onitemcreated="settingRepeater_ItemCreated"
>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:PlaceHolder ID="text" runat="server">
<asp:Label ID="settingsLabel" CssClass="editlabel" Text='<%# XPath("#lbl") %>' runat="server" />
<asp:TextBox ID="settingsLabelText" runat="server"
Text='<%# SettingsNode.SelectSingleNode(XPath("#xpath").ToString()).InnerText %>'
Columns='<%# XmlUtils.OptReadInt((XmlNode)Page.GetDataItem(),"#width",20) %>'
/>
</asp:PlaceHolder>
<asp:PlaceHolder ID="att_adder" runat="server">
<asp:CheckBox ID="settingsAttAdder" Text='<%# XPath("#lbl") %>' runat="server"
Checked='<%# ((XmlElement)SettingsNode.SelectSingleNode(XPath("#xpath").ToString())).HasAttribute(XPath("#att").ToString()) %>'
/>
</asp:PlaceHolder>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:Repeater>
Note: for extra ease I added the PlaceHolder control to group things and make the decision of which controls to remove easier.
Code behind
The code bellow is built on the notion that every repeater item is of a type. The type is extracted from the configuration xml. In my specific scenario, I could make that type to a single control by means of ID. This could be easily modified if needed.
protected List<string> repeaterItemTypes
{
get
{
List<string> ret = (List<string>)ViewState["repeaterItemTypes"];
if (ret == null)
{
ret = new List<string>();
ViewState["repeaterItemTypes"] = ret;
}
return ret;
}
}
protected void settingRepeater_ItemCreated(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
{
string type;
if (e.Item.DataItem != null)
{
// data binding mode..
type = ((XmlNode)e.Item.DataItem).LocalName;
int i = e.Item.ItemIndex;
if (i == repeaterItemTypes.Count)
repeaterItemTypes.Add(type);
else
repeaterItemTypes.Insert(e.Item.ItemIndex, type);
}
else
{
// restoring from ViewState
type = repeaterItemTypes[e.Item.ItemIndex];
}
for (int i = e.Item.Controls.Count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
if (e.Item.Controls[i].ID != type) e.Item.Controls.RemoveAt(i);
}
}
You need something that looks more like this:
<ItemTemplate>
<%# GetContent(Page.GetDataItem()) %>
</ItemTemplate>
And then have all your controls generated in the code-behind.