My question might be silly, but need an answer. As far as I know whenever "The Operation has timed out" exception occurs in HttpWebRequest.GetResponse() method than connection is closed and released. If it is not true than how does it work? I tried to google this but couldn't get the answer.
EDIT: In this case it was a post request, connection was established and the URL which called was processing the request at server end, but HttpWebRequest Object was waiting on response and after sometime exception occurred.
My understanding is that you must call the Close method to close the stream and release the connection. Failure to do so may cause your application to run out of connections. If you are uncertain, you can always put a try/catch block around the Close method or the HttpWebRequest.GetResponse().
Well I am not entirely sure but it looks like that the Operation TimedOut exception probably faults the underlying connection channel; cause all the request after that ends up with same exception.
Per MSDN Documentation
You must call the Close method to close the stream and release the
connection. Failure to do so may cause your application to run out of
connections.
I did a small trial to see
private static void MakeRequest()
{
WebRequest req = null;
try
{
req = WebRequest.Create("http://www.wg.net.pl");
req.Timeout = 10;
req.GetResponse();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
req.Timeout = 10000;
req.GetResponse(); // This as well results in TimeOut exception
}
}
Related
I am sending a message to a server through HTTP 1.1. Everything sends correctly to the server or website I have chosen, but when I receive the response from the server/website and my sr.readToEnd() executes, it terminates.
I know that the message I have sent is correct, but I am trying to do a try-catch statement were if it terminates again, it will try to read another way. I am not sure how to do this and I was advised that I could use content-length (except I do not know how to do that either).
Here is what I have so far:
try
{ //Read server message
String response = sr.ReadToEnd();
}
catch
{ //If terminate occurs, read a different way
}
If I remove the try/catch blocks I see this:
Unhandled Exception: System.IO.IOException: Unable to read data from the transport connection: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time..
I know it's pretty brief what I provided, but any methods to tackle this sort of problem I described?
I'd say in general you can do (as #joel recommended.
Or try whether catch when() works for you.
Example:
try
{
someCode();
}
catch (YourExpectedException ex) when (
someBooleanExpression
|| someOtherBooleanExpr
|| thirdBoolean)
{
/* this part runs when() YourExpectedException occurs *and*
one of those three hypothetical example expressions is True */
}
catch (YourExpectedException ex)
{
/* this part runs If YourExpectedException occurs and the previous
When() expression is *Not true */
Whatever();
} /* you can continue catching other expected exceptions
and when() combinations here.
And/Or perhaps say any other exception is unexpected and
will be handled by a higher-level:
*/
catch // any other Exception just to re-throw it back 'to-whom-it-may-concern':
throw;
See also Catching exceptions with "catch, when"
Im using a Request System called xNet and it seems ObjectDisposedExceptions are occuring which on-occurence causes a HUGE cpu spike, sometimes continuously keeping CPU at 99-100% causing freezes and lag.
The script mentioned is the following:
https://github.com/PR4GM4/xNet-Ameliorated
An example code is:
using (HttpRequest httpRequest = new HttpRequest()) {
string url = "https://httpbin.org";
string[] proxysplit = proxy.Split(':');
httpRequest.Proxy = new InternalProxyClient(ProxyType.HTTP, proxysplit[0], int.Parse(proxysplit[1]), null, null);
httpRequest.UserAgent = Http.ChromeUserAgent();
httpRequest.KeepAlive = true;
httpRequest.ConnectTimeout = 15000;
httpRequest.AllowAutoRedirect = true;
HttpResponse hr = httpRequest.Start(HttpMethod.GET, new Uri(url, UriKind.Absolute), new StringContent(""));
if (hr == null) return "2";
string sr = hr.ToString();
if (sr == null) return "2";
}
(If a list of half/dead proxies are needed, I can provide it, just im not sure if linking to them is allowed or not.)
Big note here, it seems to only ever occur whenever theres some kind of other exception like failing to connect to the proxy, or a general bad response, so good connection proxies and/or no proxy at all never has this issue (unless again a general failed error).
If you loop this code, and give it a dead proxy (And to speed things up, multi-thread it to around 5 a time) it will eventually cause an exception like bad response or a timeout and eventually an objectdisposedexception.
I tried debugging in Visual Studio but it gives me almost no information, Historical Debugging gives no information just "Source not found".
Call Stack for the First Exception Thrown of the ObjectDisposedException in the screenshot above.
Seems to be related to line 1430 in ~Http/HttpRequest.cs or line 217 in ~Proxy/ProxyClient.cs as it's the only line I know to exist thats to do with EndConnect socket and also coincidentally can produce ObjectDisposedException. Just not sure how to properly handle the exception here without causing the rest of the script to fail. Also why does a simple exception here cause so much CPU spike?
Strangely enough, no matter how I wrap an exception handler for ObjectDisposedException it never gets triggered, no matter how much code or where I wrap? (On both scripts)
try
{
tcpClient.EndConnect(ar);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
connectException = ex;
}
I found out why, it wasnt because of the .EndConnect on either of the 2 files, it was actually caused by the .Close() calls, since it does .EndConnect inside of that, thats why I couldnt see any "Source" etc.
So it was causeed because the socket connection wasnt connected, so doing .Close() would cause the Exception.
It was a simple fix.
(Where tcp = a TcpClient)
Do the following instead of just tcp.Close()
On Timeouts (Where it's most likely if never at all connected):
if (tcp.Client.Connected) {
tcp.GetStream().Close();
tcp.Close();
}
When it might be properly connected:
if (!tcp.Connected) {
if (tcp.Client.Connected) tcp.GetStream().Close();
tcp.Close();
}
i am developing a wp8 app, i use a HttpClient to perform PostAsync and GetAsync operations, i am setting the timeout to 1 second :
private HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
client.Timeout = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(1000);
I have a try catch block on my Get and Post operation to caught the TimeOutExceptions as:
try
{
var response = await client.PostAsync(param1,param2);
}
catch (TimeoutException e)
{
//do something
}
Nevertheless my catch block is not capturing the exception, i debug my app and watch the throwen exception is a TaskCanceledException, ¿How can i caught the right exception?, ¿Why is the TimeOutException replaced?
Finally, and to avoid confusion, my real timeout will be 10 seconds, i am using 1 seconds just to test, and i need to show a message to the user if the timeout is exceeded.
On the HttpClicent PostAsync, the timeout is not sent as a TimeoutException. It is sent as a TaskCanceledException.
It is not 100% clear from the documentation, that I have seen, but the behaviour you are getting is the correct behavior. When the timeout is reached, TaskCanceledException is thrown.
This makes a little bit of sense if you look here | HttpClicent.Timeout Property
You may also set different timeouts for individual requests using a CancellationTokenSource on a task.
Suppose I create a HTTPWebRequest, call its GetResponse() and start reading from the response stream. If the connection is interrupted while reading from the stream, do I have to wait for it to time out, or can I know right away that something's gone wrong? No exception is thrown when I interrupt the connection (e.g. I disconnect my computer from the network).
It depends on the situation.
In general you'll need to be prepared for both situations (immediate and late interruption).
If, for example, the server disconnects you, you'll know relatively quickly.
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.webexceptionstatus for the kinds of errors that can occur (the WebRequest classes throw WebExceptions on errors)
You have a variety of options:
Use the async methods (BeginGet... and EndGet...) and model your application around this. Basically you'll be notified "at some point" if there was a success or error. Do something else in the meantime
If you want absolute control you can specify a ReadTimeout on the acquired stream (See comment on the other answer, set Timeout on the request as well). Re-try or whatever.
Just wait
You dont have to worry if the request is interrupted or not.
You can specify explicit timeout as follows.
If its interrupted you will get exception.
try
{
var request = HttpWebRequest.Create(url);
request.Timeout = 3000;
var response = request.GetResponse() as HttpWebResponse;
if (response.StatusCode.Equals(HttpStatusCode.OK))
{
//do stuff
}
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
exception.ToLog();
}
Most probably you have to wait for the timeout
My application is working as a client application for a bank server. The application is sending a request and getting a response from the bank. This application is normally working fine, but sometimes
The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or
an application request
error with error code as 995 comes through.
public void OnDataReceived(IAsyncResult asyn)
{
BLCommonFunctions.WriteLogger(0, "In :- OnDataReceived",
ref swReceivedLogWriter, strLogPath, 0);
try
{
SocketPacket theSockId = (SocketPacket)asyn.AsyncState;
int iRx = theSockId.thisSocket.EndReceive(asyn); //Here error is coming
string strHEX = BLCommonFunctions.ByteArrToHex(theSockId.dataBuffer);
}
}
Once this error starts to come for all transactions after that same error begin to appear, so
please help me to sort out this problem. If possible then with some sample code
Regards,
Ashish Khandelwal
995 is an error reported by the IO Completion Port. The error comes since you try to continue read from the socket when it has most likely been closed.
Receiving 0 bytes from EndRecieve means that the socket has been closed, as does most exceptions that EndRecieve will throw.
You need to start dealing with those situations.
Never ever ignore exceptions, they are thrown for a reason.
Update
There is nothing that says that the server does anything wrong. A connection can be lost for a lot of reasons such as idle connection being closed by a switch/router/firewall, shaky network, bad cables etc.
What I'm saying is that you MUST handle disconnections. The proper way of doing so is to dispose the socket and try to connect a new one at certain intervals.
As for the receive callback a more proper way of handling it is something like this (semi pseudo code):
public void OnDataReceived(IAsyncResult asyn)
{
BLCommonFunctions.WriteLogger(0, "In :- OnDataReceived", ref swReceivedLogWriter, strLogPath, 0);
try
{
SocketPacket client = (SocketPacket)asyn.AsyncState;
int bytesReceived = client.thisSocket.EndReceive(asyn); //Here error is coming
if (bytesReceived == 0)
{
HandleDisconnect(client);
return;
}
}
catch (Exception err)
{
HandleDisconnect(client);
}
try
{
string strHEX = BLCommonFunctions.ByteArrToHex(theSockId.dataBuffer);
//do your handling here
}
catch (Exception err)
{
// Your logic threw an exception. handle it accordinhly
}
try
{
client.thisSocket.BeginRecieve(.. all parameters ..);
}
catch (Exception err)
{
HandleDisconnect(client);
}
}
the reason to why I'm using three catch blocks is simply because the logic for the middle one is different from the other two. Exceptions from BeginReceive/EndReceive usually indicates socket disconnection while exceptions from your logic should not stop the socket receiving.
In my case, the request was getting timed out. So all you need to do is to increase the time out while creating the HttpClient.
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
client.Timeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5);
I had the same issue with RS232 communication. The reason, is that your program executes much faster than the comport (or slow serial communication).
To fix it, I had to check if the IAsyncResult.IsCompleted==true. If not completed, then IAsyncResult.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne()
Like this :
Stream s = this.GetStream();
IAsyncResult ar = s.BeginWrite(data, 0, data.Length, SendAsync, state);
if (!ar.IsCompleted)
ar.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne();
Most of the time, ar.IsCompleted will be true.
I had this problem. I think that it was caused by the socket getting opened and no data arriving within a short time after the open. I was reading from a serial to ethernet box called a Devicemaster. I changed the Devicemaster port setting from "connect always" to "connect on data" and the problem disappeared. I have great respect for Hans Passant but I do not agree that this is an error code that you can easily solve by scrutinizing code.
In my case the issue was caused by the fact that starting from .NET 5 or 6 you must either call async methods for async stream, or sync methods for sync strem.
So that if I called FlushAsync I must have get context using GetContextAsync
What I do when it happens is Disable the COM port into the Device Manager and Enable it again.
It stop the communications with another program or thread and become free for you.
I hope this works for you. Regards.
I ran into this error while using Entity Framework Core with Azure Sql Server running in Debug mode in Visual Studio. I figured out that it is an exception, but not a problem. EF is written to handle this exception gracefully and complete the work. I had VS set to break on all exceptions, so it did. Once I unchecked the check box in VS to not break on this exception, my C# code, calling EF, using Azure Sql worked every time.