I have a custom list called ServiceFormFields and it has a List property named ChildrenTables.
I want to order descending by ChildrenTables' names
var fields = activeForm.ServiceFormFields.OrderBy (o =>
o.ChildrenTables.OrderBy(c=>c)).ToList();
but it does not work.
I want to order ServiceFormFields list according to its children. Maybe I should do with GroupBy..
So, for example...
ServiceFormFields has FieldName property.. and Children is a List of String
FieldName = Matter, Children = Version
FieldName = Client, Children = Matter
FieldName = Status, Children = Null
FieldName = Version, Children = Null (but has parents, it is Matter)
so and I want to order like:
2,1,3,4
because Client is the on highest level, second is Matter, third one is Version because Matter is its parent, and final is Status, because it does not have any dependency.
Edit: This is structure of the class
public class ServiceForm
{
public List<ServiceFormField> ServiceFormFields { get; set; }
public string Id { get; set; }
public bool IsDefaultPrimary { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
}
public class ServiceFormField
{
public FormProperty FormField {get;set;}
public bool IsVisible { get;set;}
public List<string> ParentTables { get; set; }
public bool HasChildren { get; set; }
public List<string> ChildrenTables { get; set; }
}
public partial class FormProperty
{
private string NameField;
private string SQLInfoField;
...
}
NameField contains Client, Matter, Version..
I don't know if this is what you want, but here's a solution with the least bits of code needed.
I just transformed all the Childrens into a single string, and then the order by compares against them.
This is certainly not the most performance-wise solution, if this matters.
here's a sample:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ServiceForm sf = new ServiceForm();
sf.ServiceFormFields = new List<ServiceFormField>
{
new ServiceFormField { ChildrenTables = new List<string> { "a", "b", "c"}},
new ServiceFormField { ChildrenTables = new List<string> { "tra la la", "xxx"}},
new ServiceFormField { ChildrenTables = new List<string> { "TTTTT" }},
new ServiceFormField { ChildrenTables = new List<string> { "123455", "8157125", "1763123"}},
new ServiceFormField { ChildrenTables = new List<string> { " ", " ", " ", " "}}
};
var ordered= sf.ServiceFormFields.OrderByDescending(f => string.Join(",", f.ChildrenTables)).ToList();
foreach(ServiceFormField sff in ordered)
{
foreach(string s in sff.ChildrenTables)
{
Console.WriteLine(s);
}
}
}
Output:
There are two ways, first you can use the List.Sort function with the signature Comparison like:
activeForm.ServiceFormFields.Sort(new Comparison<ServiceFormField>((e1,e2)=>Compare(e1, e2)));
private static int Compare(ServiceFormField e1, ServiceFormField e2)
{
//Do your logic here
}
in this case you will have an inplace sort.
or use the linq orderby function with the signature to KeySelector, an IComparer and implement an IComparer like that
var result = activeForm.ServiceFormFields.OrderBy(e => e, new ServiceFormFieldComparer());
public class ServiceFormFieldComparer : IComparer<ServiceFormField>
{
private int Compare(ServiceFormField e1, ServiceFormField e2)
{
//Your logic here
}
}
in this case you will have an ordered list returned to you
Related
class cuentaBancaria
{
public cuentaBancaria()
{
}
public cuentaBancaria(string nombreCliente, string numCuenta, double tipoInteres, double saldo)
{
this.nombreCliente = nombreCliente;
this.numCuenta = numCuenta;
this.tipoInteres = tipoInteres;
this.saldo = saldo;
}
public string nombreCliente { get; set; }
public string numCuenta { get; set; }
public double tipoInteres { get; set; }
public double saldo { get; set; }
public static List<cuentaBancaria> cuentas = new List<cuentaBancaria>()
{
new cuentaBancaria ("John Doe", "123456", 1.5, 159),
new Tarjeta ("John Doe", "123456" , 1.5, 159, "123456789012", "John Doe", TipoTarjeta.CREDITO)
};
}
TipoTarjeta:
enum TipoTarjeta
{
CREDITO,
DEBITO,
MONEDERO,
FINANCIACION
}
Tarjeta:
class Tarjeta : cuentaBancaria
{
public Tarjeta()
{
}
public Tarjeta(string nombreCliente, string numCuenta, double tipoInteres, double saldo, string numTarjeta, string nombre, TipoTarjeta tipoTarjeta)
{
base.nombreCliente = nombreCliente;
base.numCuenta = numCuenta;
base.tipoInteres = tipoInteres;
base.saldo = saldo;
this.numTarjeta = numTarjeta;
this.nombre = nombre;
this.tipoTarjeta = tipoTarjeta;
}
public string numTarjeta { get; set; }
public string nombre { get; set; }
public TipoTarjeta tipoTarjeta { get; set; }
}
I want to return the elements that has a TipoTarjeta.XXX but when I try the
cuentas.Where(c => c.tipoTarjeta == tipo)
I get the error that is an element of the child (Tarjeta) not cuentaBancaria.
How can I only get those elements with that type?
You have a type mismatch.
Your function is declared such that it returns List<cuentaBancaria>, but Where is a LINQ extension method that returns an IEnumerable<cuentBancaria>.
To resolve your issue, add a call to the ToList() extension method as follows:
cuentas.Where(c => c.tipoTarjeta == tipo).ToList()
UPDATE
I copied your code to VSCode and this version of Main works for me. From what I could tell, you needed to reference cuentas through cuentaBancaria; also, the property you were referencing in the Where clause was incorrect, based on the class definition.
public static void Main()
{
var tipo = 3.15;
var result = cuentaBancaria.cuentas.Where(c => c.tipoInteres == tipo).ToList();
foreach (var item in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(item.tipoInteres);
}
}
You first need to filter the list to only the types of Tarjeta, and then you can filter by properties of Tarjeta. You can do this using .OfType<T>() in LINQ:
cuentas.OfType<Tarjeta>().Where(c => c.tipoTarjeta == tipo)
I have a method which looks like
private Component[] AssociateComponentsWithParametersAndValues(
IEnumerable<Component> components,
IEnumerable<ComponentParameter> parameters,
IEnumerable<ComponentParameterValue> values
)
{
var componentsDictionary = new Dictionary<string, Component>();
var parametersDictionary = new Dictionary<string, ComponentParameter>();
var valuesDictionary = new Dictionary<string, ComponentParameterValue>();
foreach (Component c in components)
{
bool componentMatch = components.Any(co => co == c);
bool identifierMatch = components.Any(co => co.Identifier == c.Identifier);
if (!componentsDictionary.ContainsKey(c.Identifier))
componentsDictionary.Add(c.Identifier, c);
}
// Do a bunch of stuff to mutate the components
return components.ToArray();
}
You would think that componentMatch and identifierMatch would both be true each time right? Instead, componentMatch is always false and identifierMatch is always true. Also, the identifier is (nearly, occasionally there's some bad data) always unique, so it's not like it can be finding another component with the same identifier.
So, there must be something weird with the Component class. Well, here's what it looks like
public class Component : ConfigurationObject
{
public string Parent { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
public string Module { get; set; }
public string Code { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string TypeName { get; set; }
public bool? Enabled { get; set; }
public string DBIdentifier { get; set; }
public Dictionary<string, ComponentParameterAndValues> ParametersAndValues { get; set; }
public override string Identifier => DBIdentifier;
}
And here's the class it implements
public abstract class ConfigurationObject
{
public abstract string Identifier { get; }
}
Why is this happening?
The only way I could see this break, is if IEnumerable<Component> components is a lazily evaluated enumerable, returning new iterator objects every time. This works:
var list = new List<Component>
{
new Component { Identifier = "Foo" },
new Component { Identifier = "Bar" },
new Component { Identifier = "Baz" },
};
foreach (Component c in list)
{
bool componentMatch = list.Any(co => co == c);
Console.WriteLine($"Component {c.Identifier} match: {componentMatch}");
}
Because == checks reference equality (unless Component overrides it, but it doesn't look like it does). However, if it's not a list, but a new result each iteration:
IEnumerable<Component> list = GetList();
foreach (Component c in list)
{
bool componentMatch = list.Any(co => co == c);
Console.WriteLine($"Component {c.Identifier} match: {componentMatch}");
}
private static IEnumerable<Component> GetList()
{
yield return new Component { Identifier = "Foo" };
yield return new Component { Identifier = "Bar" };
yield return new Component { Identifier = "Baz" };
}
Then it prints false, because foreach() and Any() each get a new collection of new objects, so their references don't match.
The solution would be to enumerate once, and store the components once, materialized in a list, and use that:
var localComponents = components.ToList();
foreach (Component c in localComponents)
{
// ...
}
Lets say I have a list that contains 1 record:
[
{
"AccountNumber": 1234,
"eDocConfirms": true,
"eDocStatements": true,
"eDocTaxforms": false
}
]
This list is a strongly typed object with these properties:
public int AccountNumber { get; set; }
public bool? eDocConfirms { get; set; }
public bool? eDocStatements { get; set; }
public bool? eDocTaxforms { get; set; }
Using LINQ, I'd like to turn it into a list that looks like this:
[
{
"AccountNumber": 1234,
"EDocumentTypeName ": "Confirms"
},
{
"AccountNumber": 1234,
"EDocumentTypeName": "Statements"
}
]
This new list will a list of a different type:
public class DeliveryPreference
{
public int AccountNumber { get; set; }
public string EDocumentTypeName { get; set; }
}
Note that Taxforms was not included in the new list because it was set to false in the first list.
I know I could easily do this with some loops, but I would prefer using LINQ.
I understand that Stack Overflow prefers that I show what I have tried, but I am having trouble wrapping my brain around this.
For this case I would use additional function
public static IEnumerable<string> GetTrueProperties(Data t)
{
if (t.eDocConfirms == true) yield return "Confirms";
if (t.eDocStatements == true) yield return "Statements";
if (t.eDocTaxForms == true) yield return "Tax";
}
simply because it is an object and not a dictionary; else you could dynamically select properties which are true(or you could use reflection, but I think it would be too much here, since you have strongly typed object).
then it would look like
var list = new List<Data> {
new Data
{
AccountNumber = 1,
eDocConfirms = true,
eDocStatements = true,
eDocTaxForms = false
}
};
list.SelectMany(item => GetTrueProperties(item).Select(p => new DeliveryPreference
{
AccountNumber = item.AccountNumber,
EDocumentTypeName = p
}));
This is very ugly code, but it works. It should be easy to comprehend. Reflection can be extracted to a new function.
using System;
using System.Linq;
public class Program
{
public class Account {
public int AccountNumber { get; set; }
public bool? eDocConfirms { get; set; }
public bool? eDocStatements { get; set; }
public bool? eDocTaxforms { get; set; }
}
public class DeliveryPreference
{
public int AccountNumber { get; set; }
public string EDocumentTypeName { get; set; }
}
public static void Main()
{
var acc = new Account {
AccountNumber = 10,
eDocConfirms = true,
eDocStatements = false,
eDocTaxforms = true
};
var transformed = acc.GetType()
.GetProperties()
.Where(p => p.PropertyType == typeof(bool?)
&& ((bool?)p.GetValue(acc)).HasValue
&& ((bool?)p.GetValue(acc)).Value)
.Select(p => new DeliveryPreference {
AccountNumber = acc.AccountNumber,
EDocumentTypeName = p.Name.Substring(4)
});
foreach (var t in transformed) {
Console.WriteLine(t.AccountNumber);
Console.WriteLine(t.EDocumentTypeName);
}
}
}
Let me explain, I have a model list in which I have a little more than a thousand parameters, so I have to fill the list with some variables, the thing is that I don't want to do this:
list.Add(new Model{
name1= value,
name2= value,
.....
name1000=value
});
I have an array that contains the names of the parameters in the list, so I was wondering if is possible to use that array of the names and in a loop get the variables fill in, something like this:
list.Add(new Model{
//a loop?
array[0]= value
});
Thanks.
You can achieve this using reflection. Code below
public class ModelFactory
{
private IDictionary<string, PropertyInfo> propertiesInfo { get; set; }
public ModelFactory()
{
this.propertiesInfo = typeof(Model)
.GetProperties()
.ToDictionary(p => p.Name, p => p);
}
public Model Create(string[] propertiesToInitialize, dynamic value)
{
var model = new Model();
foreach (var propertyName in propertiesToInitialize)
{
if (this.propertiesInfo.ContainsKey(propertyName))
{
var property = this.propertiesInfo[propertyName];
property.SetValue(model, value);
}
}
return model;
}
}
Model to initialize
public class Model
{
public int MyProperty1 { get; set; }
public int MyProperty2 { get; set; }
public int MyProperty3 { get; set; }
public int MyProperty4 { get; set; }
public int MyProperty5 { get; set; }
}
Usage
public void Test()
{
var propertiesToInitialize = new string[] { "MyProperty1", "MyProperty2", "MyProperty4" };
var modelFactory = new ModelFactory();
var list = new List<Model>();
list.Add(modelFactory.Create(propertiesToInitialize, 500));
Console.WriteLine("MyProperty1 " + list[0].MyProperty1); // 500
Console.WriteLine("MyProperty2 " + list[0].MyProperty2); // 500
Console.WriteLine("MyProperty3 " + list[0].MyProperty3); // 0
Console.WriteLine("MyProperty4 " + list[0].MyProperty4); // 500
Console.WriteLine("MyProperty5 " + list[0].MyProperty5); // 0
}
However as already mentioned in comments, please reconsider your model design because model with these many properties is not optimal.
I have a collection of strings:
"Alberton;Johannesburg"
"Allendale;Phoenix"
"Brackenhurst;Alberton"
"Cape Town;"
"Durban;"
"Johannesburg;"
"Mayville;Durban"
"Phoenix;Durban"
"Sandton;Johannesburg"
that I want to structure into a hierarchical structure in the fastest possible manner, like:
Johannesburg
Alberton
Brackenhurst
Sandton
Cape Town
Durban
Phoenix
Allandale
Mayville
Currently I have nested for loops and checks, but was hoping I could achieve this with a single LAMBDA query?
The above mentioned strings are in a List.
I prepared lambda-like solution, but you should really think if it's more readable/efficient then your current one:
Helper Extension Method:
public static class ChildrenGroupExtensions
{
public static List<CityInfo> GetChildren(this IEnumerable<IGrouping<string, City>> source, string parentName)
{
var cities = source.SingleOrDefault(g => g.Key == parentName);
if (cities == null)
return new List<CityInfo>();
return cities.Select(c => new CityInfo { Name = c.Name, Children = source.GetChildren(c.Name) }).ToList();
}
}
Helper Classes:
public class City
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Parent { get; set; }
}
public class CityInfo
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<CityInfo> Children { get; set; }
}
Usage:
var groups = (from i in items
let s = i.Split(new[] { ';' })
select new City { Name = s[0], Parent = s[1] }).GroupBy(e => e.Parent);
var root = groups.GetChildren(string.Empty);
Where items is your List<string>
You can look the results with simple helper method like that one:
private static void PrintTree(List<CityInfo> source, int level)
{
if (source != null)
{
source.ForEach(c =>
{
Enumerable.Range(1, level).ToList().ForEach(i => Console.Write("\t"));
Console.WriteLine(c.Name);
PrintTree(c.Children, level + 1);
});
}
}
And the results are:
Cape Town
Durban
Mayville
Phoenix
Allendale
Johannesburg
Alberton
Brackenhurst
Sandton
You haven't specified any specific data structure so I just used a class called Area with a list of children of itself. Also, it's in 2 lines of linq. There is also no check to see if an area is a child of 2 separate parents as the code is. Here's the code for the test I used(Relevant lines in-between the equals comments):
[TestFixture]
public class CitiesTest
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
var strings = new List<string>
{
"Alberton;Johannesburg",
"Allendale;Phoenix",
"Brackenhurst;Alberton",
"Cape Town;",
"Durban;",
"Johannesburg;",
"Mayville;Durban",
"Phoenix;Durban",
"Sandton;Johannesburg"
};
//===================================================
var allAreas = strings.SelectMany(x=>x.Split(';')).Where(x=>!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(x)).Distinct().ToDictionary(x=>x, x=>new Area{Name = x});
strings.ForEach(area =>
{
var areas = area.Split(';');
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(areas[1]))
return;
var childArea = allAreas[areas[0]];
if (!allAreas[areas[1]].Children.Contains(childArea))
allAreas[areas[1]].Children.Add(childArea);
childArea.IsParent = false;
});
var result = allAreas.Select(x=>x.Value).Where(x => x.IsParent);
//===================================================
}
public class Area
{
public string Name;
public bool IsParent;
public List<Area> Children { get; set; }
public Area()
{
Children = new List<Area>();
IsParent = true;
}
}
}