We Keep Coding

Custom Collection/List To Store Custom Objects

I have a customer object class:
public class customerObject
{
private string _address1;
private string _address2;
private string _address3;
private string _category;
private string _country;
private string _county;
private string _custcode;
private string _fullname;
private string _int_rep_hou;
private string _int_rep_key;
private double _lat;
private double _lng;
private string _postcode;
private string _rep_code;
private string _telephone;
public customerObject()
{
}
public string Address1
{
get { return _address1; }
set { _address1 = value; }
}
public string Address2
{
get
{
return _address2;
}
set { _address2 = value; }
}
public string Address3 { get { return _address3; } set { _address3 = value; } }
public string Category
{
get { return _category; }
set { _category = value; }
}
public string Country { get { return _country; } set { _country = value; } }
public string County { get { return _county; } set { _county = value; } }
public string Custcode
{
get { return _custcode; }
set { _custcode = value; }
}
public string Fullname
{
get { return _fullname; }
set { _fullname = value; }
}
public string Int_rep_hou
{
get { return _int_rep_hou; }
set { _int_rep_hou = value; }
}
public string Int_rep_key
{
get { return _int_rep_key; }
set { _int_rep_key = value; }
}
public double Lat { get { return _lat; } set { _lat = value; } }
public double Lng { get { return _lng; } set { _lng = value; } }
public string Postcode { get { return _postcode; } set { _postcode = value; } }
public string Rep_code
{
get { return _rep_code; }
set { Rep_code = value; }
}
public string Telephone { get { return _telephone; } set { _telephone = value; }
}
}
I have a CustomCollections class
public class CustomerCollection
{
public List<customerObject> Customers { get; set; }
}
My method that loops through dt rows and converts to a customer object
public List<Valueobjects.CustomerCollection> dolist(DataTable temptablename)
{
//Create Collection Object
Valueobjects.CustomerCollection Collection = new Valueobjects.CustomerCollection();
foreach (DataRow row in temptablename.Rows)
{
//Create Customer Object
Valueobjects.customerObject Customer = new Valueobjects.customerObject();
//set values of customer object
Customer.Rep_code = "";
Customer.Int_rep_key = "";
Customer.Int_rep_hou = "";
Customer.Fullname = row["Fullname"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Custcode = row["Custcode"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Category = row["Category"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Address1 = row["Address1"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Address2 = row["Address2"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Address3 = row["Address3"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Postcode = row["Postcode"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Country = row["Country"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Telephone = row["Telephone"].ToString().Trim();
Customer.Lat = Convert.ToDouble(row["Lat"]);
Customer.Lng = Convert.ToDouble(row["Lng"]);
Customer.County = row["County"].ToString().Trim();
//add to the collection (list)
Collection.Customers.Add(Customer);
}
temptablename = null;
return Collection;
}
However when I create a new Customer object and a new CustomerCollection object I am getting an error when adding the customer to the collection list.
Error:
Error 32 Cannot implicitly convert type
'Classes.Valueobjects.CustomerCollection' to
'System.Collections.Generic.List'

Your method is returning a List<CustomerCollection>:
public List<Valueobjects.CustomerCollection> dolist(DataTable temptablename)
{
//...
}
But the code is trying to return a CustomerCollection:
return Collection;
Just as the error says, these two types are different.
If a CustomerCollection is already a collection of customers, then semantically what is a List<Valueobjects.CustomerCollection>? A collection of collections? It seems like you're over-pluralizing your objects :)
There are two approaches here. Either return a CustomerCollection from the method:
public CustomerCollection dolist(DataTable temptablename)
{
//...
}
Or use a List<Customer> if you want to use generic lists as your collection containers:
public List<Customer> dolist(DataTable temptablename)
{
//...
var Collection = new List<Customer>();
//...
Collection.Add(Customer);
//...
return Collection;
}
Side note: You may want to stick to C# conventions for variable naming. As you can see from the code highlighting here on Stack Overflow, your variable names can easily be mistaken for classes/types, which can cause confusion when supporting the code.

Return a CustomerCollection instead of a List<Valueobjects.CustomerCollection>:
public Valueobjects.CustomerCollection Dolist(DataTable temptablename)
{
// ...
Your object has a list, it is not a list.
MSDN: Inheritance

How to set values of user control from class

I have a user control and their are many textbox on it. I add this user control to a different project and I can use it, when I write every property on UserControl. I want to set textbox fields of this user control with using a class. These are my codes:
Class:
namespace IEUserControl
{
public class IEValue
{
public string IsEmriNo { get; set; }
public string Nevi { get; set; }
public string BrutKg { get; set; }
public string NetKg { get; set; }
}
}
User Control:
namespace IsEmriUserControl
{
public partial class UC_IsEmri : UserControl
{
public UC_IsEmri()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
//private IsEmriValue _isEmri;
//public IsEmriValue isEmri
//{
// get
// {
// return _isEmri;
// }
// set
// {
// _isEmri = value;
// }
//}
public string IsEmriNo
{
get { return txtIsEmriNo.Text; }
set { txtIsEmriNo.Text = value; }
}
public string Nevi
{
get { return txtNevi.Text; }
set { txtNevi.Text = value; }
}
public string BrutKg
{
get { return txtBrutKg.Text; }
set { txtBrutKg.Text = value; }
}
public string NetKg
{
get { return txtNetKg.Text; }
set { txtNetKg.Text = value; }
}
}
}
When I use properties, I can set textbox values. However I want to set my textbox values with my Class. Can anyone give me an example setting textbox values with using class? Thank you.

Make a method/property like this
public IEValue IE_Value
{
get
{
return new IEValue() {
IsEmrino = txtIsEmriNo.Text,
Nevi = txtNevi.Text,
BrutKg = txtBrutKg.Text,
NetKg = txtNetKg.Text
};
}
set
{
txtIsEmriNo.Text = value.IsEmrino;
txtNevi.Text = value.Nevi;
txtBrutKg.Text = value.BrutKg;
txtNetKg.Text = value.NetKg;
}
}

How to use the Same Class on Client as on the Service?

How can I pass an entire defined class through a WCF service? I have the class defined on both the service and client side. I keep getting an error:
Best overloaded method match has some invalid arguments.
The whole class was copied from the client-side to the service-side.
Client side calling:
TransferProxy.PutTransferOnService(Transfer);
Defined on service:
[OperationContract]
bool PutTransferOnService(TypeTransfer Transfer);
I don't want to access individual items on the class from the client, I just want to move the WHOLE populated object through and do processing on the server side.
[DataContract]
public class TypeTransfer
{
private string userID;
private string transferNum;
private DateTime effectiveDate;
private int unitCount;
private int skuCount;
private string reason;
private string localStatus;
private string destStatus;
private string carrier;
private string sourceStore;
private string destinationStore;
private string inSeal;
private string outSeal;
[DataMember]
private List<TypeSOQ> correspondingSOQ = new List<TypeSOQ>();
[DataMember]
private List<TypeProductList> ProductList = new List<TypeProductList>();
public TypeTransfer() { }
// Function adds single item to transfer object
public void AddItem(int ProductID, string SKU, string PrimarySKU, string SCC, string ProductDescription, int TransferQty)
{
ProductList.Add(new TypeProductList
{
productID = ProductID,
sku = SKU,
primaryUPC = PrimarySKU,
scc = SCC,
description = ProductDescription,
transferQty = TransferQty
});
}
// Add SOQ to transfer object (can support multiple SOQ's)
public void AddSOQ(TypeSOQ soq)
{
correspondingSOQ.Add(soq);
}
// Function returns number of skus in Product List
public int GetSKUTotal()
{
return ProductList.Count();
}
// Function returns total number of items in transfer
public int GetItemTotal()
{
int itemtotal = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < ProductList.Count(); i++)
{
itemtotal += ProductList[i].transferQty;
}
return itemtotal;
}
// Return entire SOQ list
public List<TypeSOQ> GetSOQs()
{
return correspondingSOQ;
}
// Returns full product list in transfer object
public List<TypeProductList> GetProductList()
{
return ProductList;
}
[DataMember]
public string UserID
{
get { return userID; }
set { userID = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string TransferNum
{
get { return transferNum; }
set { transferNum = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public DateTime EffectiveDate
{
get { return effectiveDate; }
set { effectiveDate = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public int UnitCount
{
get { return unitCount; }
set { unitCount = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string Reason
{
get { return reason; }
set { reason = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string LocalStatus
{
get { return localStatus; }
set { localStatus = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string DestStatus
{
get { return destStatus; }
set { destStatus = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string Carrier
{
get { return carrier; }
set { carrier = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string SourceStore
{
get { return sourceStore; }
set { sourceStore = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string DestStore
{
get { return destinationStore; }
set { destinationStore = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string InSeal
{
get { return inSeal; }
set { inSeal = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string OutSeal
{
get { return outSeal; }
set { outSeal = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public int SKUCount
{
get { return skuCount; }
set { skuCount = value; }
}
}

You said - The whole class was copied from the client-side to the service-side.
You don't need to copy your class to server side. just define your class in a separate library and give reference of that same library to both client and server.

Constructors GetInfo

I am new to C# and am working on classes and understanding them. My problem is I am not understanding how to create a Get to retrieve the private variable _yourname and Set to set the private variable _yourname.
namespace WindowsFormsApplication1
{
class InputClass
{
private string _yourName;
public string _banner;
public virtual void GetInfo();
public InputClass(String _banner)
{
_banner = "Enter your name";
}
}
}
Maybe I am using the wrong function to GetInfo. But I am also wondering when I have the GetInfo if in the () I should write _yourname in it.

In C# there are properties, which have the function of public getter and setter methods in other languages:
class InputClass
{
private string _yourName;
public string _banner;
public InputClass(String _banner)
{
this._banner = _banner;
}
public string YourName
{
get { return _yourName; }
set { _yourName = value; }
}
}
But you can use auto properties, if you want:
class InputClass
{
public InputClass(String _banner)
{
Banner = _banner;
}
public string YourName
{
get; set;
}
public string Banner
{
get; set;
}
}

It sounds like you are trying to provide access to the _yourName field. If so then just use a property
class InputClass {
public string YourName {
get { return _yourName; }
set { _yourName = value; }
}
...
}
Now consumers of InputClass can access it as if it were a read only field.
InputClass ic = ...;
string yourName = ic.YourName;
ic.YourName = "hello";
Note: C# provides a special syntax for simple properties like this which are just meant to be wrappers over private fields. It's named auto-implemented properties
class InputClass {
public string YourName { get; set; }
}

You can override getters and settings using the get and set keywords. For example:
class InputClass
{
private string _yourName;
private string _banner;
public YourName
{
get { return _yourName; }
set { _yourName = value; }
}
public Banner
{
get { return _banner; }
set { _banner = value; }
}
public InputClass(String banner)
{
_banner = banner;
}
}

1.) Use properties instead of members, you get a free accessor (get) and mutator (set).
public string YourName { get; set; }
public string Banner { get; set; }
2.) You can take advantage of the default constructor, and declare it on the fly.
//the old way:
InputClass myClass = new InputClass();
myClass.YourName = "Bob";
myClass.Banner = "Test Banner";
//on the fly:
InputClass myClass = new InputClass()
{
YourName = "Bob",
Banner = "Test Banner"
}

C# - Marshall by value problem!

Here is the thing, I have a problem creating a new object using the remote mechanism "marshal by value".
Here is my class:
[Serializable]
internal class Empleado_MBV
{
public Empleado_MBV()
{
Id = 123456789;
Nombres = "NotEntry";
Apellidos = "NotEntry";
FechaNacimiento = DateTime.MinValue;
Direccion = "NotEntry";
Metapreferencias = "NotEntry";
}
private List<Multas> _multas;
internal List<Multas> Multas
{
get { return _multas; }
set { _multas = value; }
}
private int _id;
public int Id
{
get { return _id; }
set { _id = value; }
}
private string _nombres;
public string Nombres
{
get { return _nombres; }
set { _nombres = value; }
}
private string _apellidos;
public string Apellidos
{
get { return _apellidos; }
set { _apellidos = value; }
}
private DateTime _FecNac;
public DateTime FechaNacimiento
{
get { return _FecNac; }
set { _FecNac = value; }
}
private string _direccion;
public string Direccion
{
get { return _direccion; }
set { _direccion = value; }
}
private string _metapreferencias;
public string Metapreferencias
{
get { return _metapreferencias; }
set { _metapreferencias = value; }
}
public string _AppDomainHost
{
get { return AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName.ToString(); }
}
}
But when I try to create an object in another "appdomain", the property "_AppDomainHost" of "Empleado" does not show the "appdomain" I had created, but show the "appdomain" by default. Some ideas?
AppDomain ad1 = AppDomain.CreateDomain("NewAppDomain");
//Crear new object in my new AD.
Empleado_MBV mbv_emp = (Empleado_MBV)ad1.CreateInstanceFromAndUnwrap("DEMO_MBV_MBR.exe", "DEMO_MBV_MBR.Empleado_MBV");
Console.WriteLine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName.ToString());
Console.WriteLine("MBV : {0}",mbv_emp._AppDomainHost.ToString());
Console.ReadLine();
Result:
DEMO_MBV_MBR.vshost.exe
MBV : DEMO_MBV_MBR.vshost.exe
The result that I want:
DEMO_MBV_MBR.vshost.exe
MBV : NewAppDomain

You need to store AppDomain in Empleado_MBV's constructor.
What you are doing right now is displaying current AppDomain using its Current static property. It will return the AppDomain where current code is being executed.
Example:
private string _appDomainHost;
public string _AppDomainHost
{
get { return _appDomainHost; }
}
and in constructor:
_appDomainHost = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName.ToString();