IEnumerable OrderBy by String with complex property

IEnumerable OrderBy by String with complex property - c#

I need to sort a query by string and found this that works well. The problem is that it can't handle complex properties related entities such as "ComplexProperty.Property""RelatedEntity.Property" since it only searches the main class.
I'm thinking I should be able to parse the parts[0] by a . and somehow recursively check each type, but I can't figure out exacly how. Is this possible or am I at a dead end?
The reason for this is that I have an "old" solution (MVC 3) with a webgrid on, and the webgrid needs all data to do the sorting (it's an detatched EF4 solution) and it just takes to much time. I need to pass the sort into the query and only retrieve the posts for that page in the paging. The webgrid calls the same controller with sort and sortdir parameters and update with ajax.
If it's not possible, maybe there is another solution that I should look at that anyoune can hint about?
Edit with clarifications
Today the solution gets all violations, sends them to a webGrid and lets the webgrid do the paging and sorting. The solution has been live for many years and the violation table has grown to the point that the page is really slow, mostly becouse of that all the data is fetched every time. I have implemented paging to the repository to recieve only a portion of the class. The repository today works with IEnumerable and the ServiceLayer (business) between presentation and repository, always returns a List to presentation layer.
Here is the SQL i want to be able to use
SELECT vi.ViolationId, ar.AreaName
FROM [Violation] vi
join [ControlPoint] cp on vi.ControlPointId = cp.ControlPointId
join [Area] ar on ar.AreaId = cp.AreaId
order by ar.AreaName
I need to do this with an orderBy(string sortExpression) like this.
violations.OrderBy("ControlPoint.Area.AreaName")
and found this function (linked above) as a foundation for this.
public static IEnumerable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> list, string sortExpression)
{
sortExpression += "";
string[] parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
bool descending = false;
string property = "";
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
property = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
descending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = typeof(T).GetProperty(property);
// handle Prop.SubProp
// prop.GetType().GetProperty
if (prop == null)
{
throw new Exception("No property '" + property + "' in + " + typeof(T).Name + "'");
}
if (descending)
return list.OrderByDescending(x => prop.GetValue(x, null));
else
return list.OrderBy(x => prop.GetValue(x, null));
}
return list;
}

Ok, now it's working and I post my final results. Thanks for all the input, I would have thought this was not doable without all the comments
First all the helper methods
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string property, bool descending)
{
if(!descending)
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderBy");
else
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderByDescending");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderByDescending<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderByDescending");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IOrderedQueryable<T> source, string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenByDescending<T>(this IOrderedQueryable<T> source, string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenByDescending");
}
static IOrderedQueryable<T> ApplyOrder<T>(IQueryable<T> source, string property, string methodName)
{
string[] props = property.Split('.');
Type type = typeof(T);
ParameterExpression arg = Expression.Parameter(type, "x");
Expression expr = arg;
foreach (string prop in props)
{
// use reflection (not ComponentModel) to mirror LINQ
PropertyInfo pi = type.GetProperty(prop);
expr = Expression.Property(expr, pi);
type = pi.PropertyType;
}
Type delegateType = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(T), type);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(delegateType, expr, arg);
object result = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, lambda });
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)result;
}
public static bool TryParseSortText(this string sortExpression, out string property, out bool descending)
{
descending = false;
property = string.Empty;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
return false;
string[] parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
if (parts.Length > 0 && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(parts[0]))
{
property = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
descending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
}
else
return false;
return true;
}
Then in service layer I have this
public PagedResult<Violation> GetViolationByModule(PagedRequest pagedRequest, long moduleId, long stakeHolderId, Expression<Func<Violation, bool>> filter, string sort = "")
{
return ExceptionManager.Process(() => _GetViolationByModule(pagedRequest, moduleId, stakeHolderId, filter, sort),
"ServicePolicy");
}
private PagedResult<Violation> _GetViolationByModule(PagedRequest pagedRequest, long moduleId, long stakeHolderId, Expression<Func<Violation, bool>> filter, string sort = "")
{
var query = ViolationRepository.GetViolationByModule(moduleId, stakeHolderId);
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(sort))
{
string sortProperty = string.Empty;
bool desc = false;
if(sort.TryParseSortText(out sortProperty, out desc))
{
query = query.OrderBy(sortProperty, desc);
}
}
if (filter != null)
{
query = query.Where(filter);
}
var violations = _GetPagedResult(pagedRequest, query);
foreach (var violation in violations.Results)
{
var user = FrontendUserRepository.GetFrontendUserByName(violation.ReportBy);
if (user != null)
{
violation.ReportUserInitial = user.Initial;
}
else
{
violation.ReportUserInitial = violation.ReportBy;
}
}
return violations;
}
And from the controller I can call this by
var pagedUnamendedViolationList = ViolationService.GetViolationByModule(new PagedRequest() { Page = page, PageSize = pageSize },
moduleId,
stakeholderId,
v => (fUser == null || v.ControlPoint.Area.FronendUsers.Contains(fUser)) && !v.IsAmended,
"ControlPoint.Area.AreaName DESC"
);

Related

C# - Order By property by reflection [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>
(24 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
How do I specify the argument passed to orderby using a value I take as a parameter?
Ex:
List<Student> existingStudends = new List<Student>{ new Student {...}, new Student {...}}
Currently implementation:
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderBy(c => c.Address).ToList();
Instead of c.Address, how can I take that as a parameter?
Example
string param = "City";
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderByDescending(c => param).ToList();

You can use a little bit of reflection to construct the expression tree as follows (this is an extension method):
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty,
bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
orderByProperty is the Property name you want to order by and if pass true as parameter for desc, will sort in descending order; otherwise, will sort in ascending order.
Now you should be able to do existingStudents.OrderBy("City",true); or existingStudents.OrderBy("City",false);

Here's a possiblity using reflection...
var param = "Address";
var propertyInfo = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null));

To expand on the answer by #Icarus: if you want the return type of the extension method to be an IOrderedQueryable instead of an IQueryable, you can simply cast the result as follows:
public static IOrderedQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return (IOrderedQueryable<TEntity>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}

1) Install System.Linq.Dynamic
2) Add the following code
public static class OrderUtils
{
public static string ToStringForOrdering<T, TKey>(this Expression<Func<T, TKey>> expression, bool isDesc = false)
{
var str = expression.Body.ToString();
var param = expression.Parameters.First().Name;
str = str.Replace("Convert(", "(").Replace(param + ".", "");
return str + (isDesc ? " descending" : "");
}
}
3) Write your switch for selecting of Lambda function
public static class SortHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<UserApp, object>> UserApp(string orderProperty)
{
orderProperty = orderProperty?.ToLowerInvariant();
switch (orderProperty)
{
case "firstname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName;
case "lastname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "fullname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName + x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "email":
return x => x.Email;
}
}
}
4) Use your helpers
Dbset.OrderBy(SortHelper.UserApp("firstname").ToStringForOrdering())
5) You can use it with pagging (PagedList)
public virtual IPagedList<T> GetPage<TOrder>(Page page, Expression<Func<T, bool>> where, Expression<Func<T, TOrder>> order, bool isDesc = false,
params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes)
{
var orderedQueryable = Dbset.OrderBy(order.ToStringForOrdering(isDesc));
var query = orderedQueryable.Where(where).GetPage(page);
query = AppendIncludes(query, includes);
var results = query.ToList();
var total = Dbset.Count(where);
return new StaticPagedList<T>(results, page.PageNumber, page.PageSize, total);
}
Explanation
System.Linq.Dynamic allows us to set string value in OrderBy method. But inside this extension the string will be parsed to Lambda. So I thought it would work if we will parse Lambda to string and give it to OrderBy method. And it works!

Here's something I came up with for dealing with a conditional Descending. You could combine this with other methods of generating the keySelector func dynamically.
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource, TKey>(this IQueryable<TSource> source,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection sortOrder
)
{
if (sortOrder == System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending)
return source.OrderBy(keySelector);
else
return source.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
Usage:
//imagine this is some parameter
var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = query.OrderBy(ec => ec.MyColumnName, direction);
Notice this allows you to chain this .OrderBy extension with a new parameter onto any IQueryable.
// perhaps passed in as a request of user to change sort order
// var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = context.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Paid)
.OrderBy(ec => ec.OrderPaidUtc, direction);

private Func<T, object> GetOrderByExpression<T>(string sortColumn)
{
Func<T, object> orderByExpr = null;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortColumn))
{
Type sponsorResultType = typeof(T);
if (sponsorResultType.GetProperties().Any(prop => prop.Name == sortColumn))
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pinfo = sponsorResultType.GetProperty(sortColumn);
orderByExpr = (data => pinfo.GetValue(data, null));
}
}
return orderByExpr;
}
public List<T> OrderByDir<T>(IEnumerable<T> source, string dir, Func<T, object> OrderByColumn)
{
return dir.ToUpper() == "ASC" ? source.OrderBy(OrderByColumn).ToList() : source.OrderByDescending(OrderByColumn).ToList();``
}
// Call the code like below
var orderByExpression= GetOrderByExpression<SearchResultsType>(sort);
var data = OrderByDir<SponsorSearchResults>(resultRecords, SortDirectionString, orderByExpression);

This doesn't let you pass a string, as you asked for in your question, but it might still work for you.
The OrderByDescending method takes a Func<TSource, TKey>, so you can rewrite your function this way:
List<Student> QueryStudents<TKey>(Func<Student, TKey> orderBy)
{
return existingStudents.OrderByDescending(orderBy).ToList();
}
There are other overloads for OrderByDescending as well that take a Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>>, and/or a IComparer<TKey>. You could also look into those and see if they provide you anything of use.

The only solution that worked for me was posted here https://gist.github.com/neoGeneva/1878868 by neoGeneva.
I will re-post his code because it works well and I wouldn't want it to be lost in the interwebs!
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortExpression)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("source", "source is null.");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
throw new ArgumentException("sortExpression is null or empty.", "sortExpression");
var parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
var isDescending = false;
var propertyName = "";
var tType = typeof(T);
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
propertyName = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
isDescending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = tType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (prop == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("No property '{0}' on type '{1}'", propertyName, tType.Name));
}
var funcType = typeof(Func<,>)
.MakeGenericType(tType, prop.PropertyType);
var lambdaBuilder = typeof(Expression)
.GetMethods()
.First(x => x.Name == "Lambda" && x.ContainsGenericParameters && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(funcType);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(tType);
var propExpress = Expression.Property(parameter, prop);
var sortLambda = lambdaBuilder
.Invoke(null, new object[] { propExpress, new ParameterExpression[] { parameter } });
var sorter = typeof(Queryable)
.GetMethods()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == (isDescending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy") && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { tType, prop.PropertyType });
return (IQueryable<T>)sorter
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, sortLambda });
}
return source;
}

Add the nugget package Dynamite to your code
Add the namespace Dynamite.Extensions
Eg : using Dynamite.Extensions;
Give Order by query like any SQL query
Eg : students.OrderBy(" City DESC, Address").ToList();

To extend the response of #Icarus: if you want to sort by two fields I could perform the following function (for one field the response of Icarius works very well).
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByDynamic<T>(this IQueryable<T> q, string SortField1, string SortField2, bool Ascending)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
var body = GetBodyExp(SortField1, SortField2, param);
var exp = Expression.Lambda(body, param);
string method = Ascending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Type[] types = new Type[] { q.ElementType, exp.Body.Type };
var mce = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), method, types, q.Expression, exp);
return q.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(mce);
}
This is the function that the body returns for the lambda expression, it works with string and int, but it is enough to add more types to make it work according to the need of each programmer
public static NewExpression GetBodyExp(string field1, string field2, ParameterExpression Parametro)
{
// SE OBTIENE LOS NOMBRES DE LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLE
string TypeName1 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field1).Type.Name;
string TypeName2 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field2).Type.Name;
// SE DECLARA EL TIPO ANONIMO SEGUN LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLES
Type TypeAnonymous = null;
if (TypeName1 == "String")
{
string var1 = "0";
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
int var2 = 0;
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
if (TypeName1 == "Int32")
{
int var1 = 0;
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
//se declaran los TIPOS NECESARIOS PARA GENERAR EL BODY DE LA EXPRESION LAMBDA
MemberExpression[] args = new[] { Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field1), Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field2) };
ConstructorInfo CInfo = TypeAnonymous.GetConstructors()[0];
IEnumerable<MemberInfo> a = TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property);
//BODY
NewExpression body = Expression.New(CInfo, args, TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property));
return body;
}
to use it the following is done
IQueryable<MyClass> IqMyClass= context.MyClass.AsQueryable();
List<MyClass> ListMyClass= IqMyClass.OrderByDynamic("UserName", "IdMyClass", true).ToList();
if there is a better way to do this, it would be great if they share it
I managed to solve it thanks to: How can I make a Multiple property lambda expression with Linq

New Answer : this is a more complete answer that supports multiple columns for order by like SQL. Example : .OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC") :
namespace Utility;
public static class QueryExtension
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc, bool isThenBy = false)
{
string command = isThenBy ? (desc ? "ThenByDescending" : "ThenBy") : (desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy");
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string sqlOrderByList)
{
var ordebyItems = sqlOrderByList.Trim().Split(',');
IQueryable<TEntity> result = source;
bool useThenBy = false;
foreach (var item in ordebyItems)
{
var splt = item.Trim().Split(' ');
result = result.OrderBy(splt[0].Trim(), (splt.Length > 1 && splt[1].Trim().ToLower() == "desc"), useThenBy);
if (useThenBy)
useThenBy = true;
}
return result;
}
}
The second function iterates over orderby columns and uses the first one.
Use it like this :
using Utility;
...
public void MyMethod()
{
var query = _dbContext.Person.AsQueryable();
query.OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC");
}

I'm way late to the party but none of these solutions worked for me. I was eager to try System.Linq.Dynamic, but I couldn't find that on Nuget, maybe depreciated? Either way...
Here is a solutions I came up with. I needed to dynamically use a mixture of OrderBy, OrderByDescending and OrderBy > ThenBy.
I simply created an extension method for my list object, a bit hacky I know... I wouldn't recommend this if it were something I was doing a lot of, but it's good for a one off.
List<Employee> Employees = GetAllEmployees();
foreach(Employee oEmployee in Employees.ApplyDynamicSort(eEmployeeSort))
{
//do stuff
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<Employee> ApplyDynamicSort(this List<Employee> lEmployees, Enums.EmployeeSort eEmployeeSort)
{
switch (eEmployeeSort)
{
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_ASC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderByDescending(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Department_ASC_Salary_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Department).ThenByDescending(y => y.Salary);
default:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
}
}

Dynamic Order By On Date With Entity Framework and Linq

I had another question similar answered here on NULL values being last on an order by.
Keep NULL rows last on Dynamic Linq Order By
I would also like to see if I can do the same thing with a Date column with the following criteria.
All items with all end dates on the current date and up at the top, sorted by the most recent upcoming event
Followed by all past events using the end date and comparing to the current date with the most recent end date passed and down. I do something similar in pure SQL at the moment.
(CASE
WHEN ev.EndDate >= GETDATE() THEN 1
ELSE 2
END) ASC,
(CASE
WHEN ev.EndDate >= GETDATE() THEN ev.EndDate
ELSE ev.StartDate
END) ASC,
Example: Current Date 3/24/2017
EndDate
3/25/2017
4/15/2017
7/29/2017
3/23/2017
2/22/2016
Current Code
public static class OrderByHelper
{
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return source.AsQueryable().ThenBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return OrderBy(source, orderBy, false);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return source.AsQueryable().OrderBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return OrderBy(source, orderBy, true);
}
private static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy, bool initial)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderBy))
orderBy = "ID DESC";
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");
var expression = source.Expression;
foreach (var item in ParseOrderBy(orderBy, initial))
{
var order = item.PropertyName.Split('.')
.Aggregate((Expression)parameter, Expression.PropertyOrField);
if (!order.Type.IsValueType || Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(order.Type) != null)
{
var preOrder = Expression.Condition(
Expression.Equal(order, Expression.Constant(null, order.Type)),
Expression.Constant(1), Expression.Constant(0));
expression = CallOrderBy(expression, Expression.Lambda(preOrder, parameter), item.Direction, initial);
initial = false;
}
expression = CallOrderBy(expression, Expression.Lambda(order, parameter), item.Direction, initial);
initial = false;
}
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)source.Provider.CreateQuery(expression);
}
private static Expression CallOrderBy(Expression source, LambdaExpression selector, SortDirection direction, bool initial)
{
return Expression.Call(
typeof(Queryable), GetMethodName(direction, initial),
new Type[] { selector.Parameters[0].Type, selector.Body.Type },
source, Expression.Quote(selector));
}
private static string GetMethodName(SortDirection direction, bool initial)
{
return direction == SortDirection.Ascending ?
(initial ? "OrderBy" : "ThenBy") :
(initial ? "OrderByDescending" : "ThenByDescending");
}
private static IEnumerable<OrderByInfo> ParseOrderBy(string orderBy, bool initial)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(orderBy))
yield break;
string[] items = orderBy.Split(',');
foreach (string item in items)
{
string[] pair = item.Trim().Split(' ');
if (pair.Length > 2)
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format("Invalid OrderBy string '{0}'. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC", item));
string prop = pair[0].Trim();
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(prop))
throw new ArgumentException("Invalid Property. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC");
SortDirection dir = SortDirection.Ascending;
if (pair.Length == 2)
dir = ("desc".Equals(pair[1].Trim(), StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) ? SortDirection.Descending : SortDirection.Ascending);
yield return new OrderByInfo() { PropertyName = prop, Direction = dir, Initial = initial };
initial = false;
}
}
private class OrderByInfo
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public SortDirection Direction { get; set; }
public bool Initial { get; set; }
}
private enum SortDirection
{
Ascending = 0,
Descending = 1
}
}

The way I understand, you have a DateTime property (ley call it Date), and instead of regular sort
.OrderBy(x => x.Date)
having something like
var baseDate = DateTime.Today;
you want to sort the future values first in ascending order followed by the past values in descending order.
It can be achieved in the following generic way (works in LINQ to Objects as well as EF):
.OrderBy(x => x.Date >= baseDate ? x.Date : DateTime.MaxValue)
.ThenByDescending(x => x.Date >= baseDate ? DateTime.MinValue : x.Date)
To implement that dynamically, you could insert the following inside the implementation method body loop:
if (order.Type == typeof(DateTime)) // && some other special condition
{
var condition = Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(
order, Expression.Constant(DateTime.Today));
var order1 = Expression.Condition(condition,
order, Expression.Constant(DateTime.MaxValue));
var order2 = Expression.Condition(condition,
Expression.Constant(DateTime.MinValue), order);
expression = CallOrderBy(expression,
Expression.Lambda(order1, parameter), SortDirection.Ascending, initial);
expression = CallOrderBy(expression,
Expression.Lambda(order2, parameter), SortDirection.Descending, false);
initial = false;
continue;
}

Keep NULL rows last on Dynamic Linq Order By

I am using this snippet below for Ordering my Linq queries dynamically and works great. I am not great at reflection or complex linq queries but I need a way that when ascending order is used, that NULL values are last and vice versa.
So if my property name was an integer and the column values were 1, 3, 5, all NULL rows would be at the end, not at the beginning by default. What can I add to this expression to make that happen?
This code works with entity framework and still needs to for the NULL comparison.
Example
list.OrderBy("NAME DESC").ToList()
Class
public static class OrderByHelper
{
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, string orderBy)
{
return enumerable.AsQueryable().ThenBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> collection, string orderBy)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderBy))
orderBy = "ID DESC";
IOrderedQueryable<T> orderedQueryable = null;
foreach (OrderByInfo orderByInfo in ParseOrderBy(orderBy, false))
orderedQueryable = ApplyOrderBy<T>(collection, orderByInfo);
return orderedQueryable;
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, string orderBy)
{
return enumerable.AsQueryable().OrderBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> collection, string orderBy)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderBy))
orderBy = "ID DESC";
IOrderedQueryable<T> orderedQueryable = null;
foreach (OrderByInfo orderByInfo in ParseOrderBy(orderBy, true))
orderedQueryable = ApplyOrderBy<T>(collection, orderByInfo);
return orderedQueryable;
}
private static IOrderedQueryable<T> ApplyOrderBy<T>(IQueryable<T> collection, OrderByInfo orderByInfo)
{
string[] props = orderByInfo.PropertyName.Split('.');
Type type = typeof(T);
ParameterExpression arg = Expression.Parameter(type, "x");
Expression expr = arg;
foreach (string prop in props)
{
// use reflection (not ComponentModel) to mirror LINQ
PropertyInfo pi = type.GetProperty(prop, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
expr = Expression.Property(expr, pi);
type = pi.PropertyType;
}
Type delegateType = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(T), type);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(delegateType, expr, arg);
string methodName = String.Empty;
if (!orderByInfo.Initial && collection is IOrderedQueryable<T>)
{
if (orderByInfo.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
methodName = "ThenBy";
else
methodName = "ThenByDescending";
}
else
{
if (orderByInfo.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
methodName = "OrderBy";
else
methodName = "OrderByDescending";
}
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] { collection, lambda });
}
private static IEnumerable<OrderByInfo> ParseOrderBy(string orderBy, bool initial)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(orderBy))
yield break;
string[] items = orderBy.Split(',');
foreach (string item in items)
{
string[] pair = item.Trim().Split(' ');
if (pair.Length > 2)
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format("Invalid OrderBy string '{0}'. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC", item));
string prop = pair[0].Trim();
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(prop))
throw new ArgumentException("Invalid Property. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC");
SortDirection dir = SortDirection.Ascending;
if (pair.Length == 2)
dir = ("desc".Equals(pair[1].Trim(), StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) ? SortDirection.Descending : SortDirection.Ascending);
yield return new OrderByInfo() { PropertyName = prop, Direction = dir, Initial = initial };
initial = false;
}
}
private class OrderByInfo
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public SortDirection Direction { get; set; }
public bool Initial { get; set; }
}
private enum SortDirection
{
Ascending = 0,
Descending = 1
}

It's relatively simple. For each passed sort selector, the method executes one of the following:
.OrderBy(x => x.Member)
.ThenBy(x => x.Member)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Member)
.ThenByDescendiong(x => x.Member)
When the x.Member type is reference type or nullable value type, the desired behavior can be achieved by pre ordering with the same direction by the following expression
x => x.Member == null ? 1 : 0
Some people use ordering by bool, but I prefer to be explicit and use conditional operator with specific integer values. So the corresponding calls for the above calls would be:
.OrderBy(x => x.Member == null ? 1 : 0).ThenBy(x => x.Member)
.ThenBy(x => x.Member == null ? 1 : 0).ThenBy(x => x.Member)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Member == null ? 1 : 0).ThenByDescending(x => x.Member)
.ThenByDescending(x => x.Member == null ? 1 : 0).ThenByDescending(x => x.Member)
i.e. the original method on the pre order expression followed by the ThenBy(Descending) with the original expression.
Here is the implementation:
public static class OrderByHelper
{
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return source.AsQueryable().ThenBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return OrderBy(source, orderBy, false);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return source.AsQueryable().OrderBy(orderBy);
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy)
{
return OrderBy(source, orderBy, true);
}
private static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(IQueryable<T> source, string orderBy, bool initial)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderBy))
orderBy = "ID DESC";
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");
var expression = source.Expression;
foreach (var item in ParseOrderBy(orderBy, initial))
{
var order = item.PropertyName.Split('.')
.Aggregate((Expression)parameter, Expression.PropertyOrField);
if (!order.Type.IsValueType || Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(order.Type) != null)
{
var preOrder = Expression.Condition(
Expression.Equal(order, Expression.Constant(null, order.Type)),
Expression.Constant(1), Expression.Constant(0));
expression = CallOrderBy(expression, Expression.Lambda(preOrder, parameter), item.Direction, initial);
initial = false;
}
expression = CallOrderBy(expression, Expression.Lambda(order, parameter), item.Direction, initial);
initial = false;
}
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)source.Provider.CreateQuery(expression);
}
private static Expression CallOrderBy(Expression source, LambdaExpression selector, SortDirection direction, bool initial)
{
return Expression.Call(
typeof(Queryable), GetMethodName(direction, initial),
new Type[] { selector.Parameters[0].Type, selector.Body.Type },
source, Expression.Quote(selector));
}
private static string GetMethodName(SortDirection direction, bool initial)
{
return direction == SortDirection.Ascending ?
(initial ? "OrderBy" : "ThenBy") :
(initial ? "OrderByDescending" : "ThenByDescending");
}
private static IEnumerable<OrderByInfo> ParseOrderBy(string orderBy, bool initial)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(orderBy))
yield break;
string[] items = orderBy.Split(',');
foreach (string item in items)
{
string[] pair = item.Trim().Split(' ');
if (pair.Length > 2)
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format("Invalid OrderBy string '{0}'. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC", item));
string prop = pair[0].Trim();
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(prop))
throw new ArgumentException("Invalid Property. Order By Format: Property, Property2 ASC, Property2 DESC");
SortDirection dir = SortDirection.Ascending;
if (pair.Length == 2)
dir = ("desc".Equals(pair[1].Trim(), StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) ? SortDirection.Descending : SortDirection.Ascending);
yield return new OrderByInfo() { PropertyName = prop, Direction = dir, Initial = initial };
initial = false;
}
}
private class OrderByInfo
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public SortDirection Direction { get; set; }
public bool Initial { get; set; }
}
private enum SortDirection
{
Ascending = 0,
Descending = 1
}
}

One approach is to pass an additional expression for testing for null into the method, and use it in an additional OrderBy/ThenBy clause.
Two OrderBy clauses would be produced - the first one will be on nullOrder, while the second one will be on the actual property.
private static IOrderedQueryable<T> ApplyOrderBy<T>(IQueryable<T> collection, OrderByInfo orderByInfo, Expression<Func<T,int>> nullOrder) {
...
if (!orderByInfo.Initial && collection is IOrderedQueryable<T>) {
if (orderByInfo.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
methodName = "ThenBy";
else
methodName = "ThenByDescending";
} else {
if (orderByInfo.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
methodName = "OrderBy";
else
methodName = "OrderByDescending";
}
if (nullOrder != null) {
collection = (IQueryable<T>)typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] { collection, nullOrder });
// We've inserted the initial order by on nullOrder,
// so OrderBy on the property becomes a "ThenBy"
if (orderByInfo.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
methodName = "ThenBy";
else
methodName = "ThenByDescending";
}
// The rest of the method remains the same
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] { collection, lambda });
}
The caller would need to pass a null checker explicitly. Passing null for non-nullable fields should work. You can construct them once, and pass as needed:
static readonly Expression<Func<string,int>> NullStringOrder = s => s == null ? 1 : 0;
static readonly Expression<Func<int?,int>> NullIntOrder = i => !i.HasValue ? 1 : 0;
static readonly Expression<Func<long?,int>> NullLongOrder = i => !i.HasValue ? 1 : 0;

My approach is to create a generic class that implements IComparer<TClass>. This way you can use your class in all LINQ statements with a non-default comparer. The advantage is that you will have full type checking at compile time. You can't name properties that can't be compared or that can't be null
class NullValueLastComparer<TClass, TKey> : IComparer<TClass>
where TClass : class
where TKey : IComparable<TKey>
{
This generic class has two Type parameters: the class that you want to compare, and the type of the property you want to compare with. The where clauses assert that TClass is a reference type, so you can access Properties, and TKey is something that implements normal comparison.
To create objects for the class we have two Factory functions. Both functions need a KeySelector, similar to lots of Key Selectors you can find in LINQ. The KeySelector function is the function that will tell you which property must be used in your comparisons. It is similar to the KeySelector in function Enumerable.Where.
The second Create function gives you the possibility to provide a non-default comparer, again similar to a lot of functions in the Enumerable class:
public static IComparer<TClass> Create(Func<TClass, TKey> keySelector)
{ // call the other Create function, with the default TKey comparer
return Create(keySelector, Comparer<TKey>.Default);
}
public static IComparer<TClass> Create(Func<TClass, TKey> keySelector, IComparer<TKey> comparer)
{ // construct a null value last comparer object
// initialize with the key selector and the key comparer
return new NullValueLastComparer<TClass, TKey>()
{
KeySelector = keySelector,
KeyComparer = comparer,
};
}
I use a private constructor. Only the static create classes can construct the null value last comparer
private NullValueLastComparer() { }
Two properties: the key selector and the comparer:
private Func<TClass, TKey> KeySelector { get; set; }
private IComparer<TKey> KeyComparer { get; set; }
The actual compare function. It will use the KeySelector to get the values
that must be compared, and compares them such that a null value will be last.
public int Compare(TClass x, TClass y)
{
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(x, null))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(x));
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(y, null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(y));
// get the values to compare
TKey keyX = KeySelector(x);
TKey keyY = KeySelector(y);
return this.Compare(keyX, keyY);
}
The private function that compares the Keys such that null values will be last
private int Compare(TKey x, TKey y)
{ // compare such that null values last, or if both not null, use IComparable
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(x, null))
{
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(y, null))
{ // both null
return 0;
}
else
{ // x null, y not null => x follows y
return +1;
}
}
else
{ // x not null
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(y, null))
{ // x not null; y null: x precedes y
return -1;
}
else
{
return this.KeyComparer.Compare(x, y);
}
}
}
}
Usage:
class Person
{
public string FirstName {get; set;}
public string FamilyName {get; set;}
}
// create a comparer that will put Persons without firstName last:
IComparer<Person> myComparer =
NullValueLastComparer<Person, string>.Create(person => person.FirstName);
Person person1 = ...;
Person person2 = ...;
int compareResult = myComparer.Compare(person1, person2);
This compare will compare Persons. When two Persons are compared, it will take person.FirstName for both persons, and will put the one without FirstName as last.
Usage in a complicated LINQ statement.
Note that there is full type checking at compile time.
IEnumerable<Person> myPersonCollection = ...
var sortedPersons = myPersonCollection
.OrderBy(person => person, myComparer)
.ThenBy(person => person.LastName)
.Select(person => ...)
.ToDictonary(...)

For dynamically constructed Order By expression like this list.OrderBy("NAME DESC").ToList(), you can use the following query helper extension method.
Usage
First of all, we check to make sure property name exists in the given Class. If we do not check, it'll throw run-time exception.
Then we use use either OrderByProperty or OrderByPropertyDescending.
string orderBy = "Name";
if (QueryHelper.PropertyExists<User>(orderBy))
{
list = list.OrderByProperty(orderBy);
- OR -
list = list.OrderByPropertyDescending(orderBy);
}
Here is the real world usage in my project at GitHub.
Query Helper
public static class QueryHelper
{
private static readonly MethodInfo OrderByMethod =
typeof (Queryable).GetMethods().Single(method =>
method.Name == "OrderBy" && method.GetParameters().Length == 2);
private static readonly MethodInfo OrderByDescendingMethod =
typeof (Queryable).GetMethods().Single(method =>
method.Name == "OrderByDescending" && method.GetParameters().Length == 2);
public static bool PropertyExists<T>(string propertyName)
{
return typeof(T).GetProperty(propertyName, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase |
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance) != null;
}
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByProperty<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source, string propertyName)
{
if (typeof (T).GetProperty(propertyName, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase |
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance) == null)
{
return null;
}
ParameterExpression paramterExpression = Expression.Parameter(typeof (T));
Expression orderByProperty = Expression.Property(paramterExpression, propertyName);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(orderByProperty, paramterExpression);
MethodInfo genericMethod =
OrderByMethod.MakeGenericMethod(typeof (T), orderByProperty.Type);
object ret = genericMethod.Invoke(null, new object[] {source, lambda});
return (IQueryable<T>) ret;
}
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByPropertyDescending<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source, string propertyName)
{
if (typeof (T).GetProperty(propertyName, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase |
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance) == null)
{
return null;
}
ParameterExpression paramterExpression = Expression.Parameter(typeof (T));
Expression orderByProperty = Expression.Property(paramterExpression, propertyName);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(orderByProperty, paramterExpression);
MethodInfo genericMethod =
OrderByDescendingMethod.MakeGenericMethod(typeof (T), orderByProperty.Type);
object ret = genericMethod.Invoke(null, new object[] {source, lambda});
return (IQueryable<T>) ret;
}
}

Improve sorting with linq [duplicate]

I found an example in the VS2008 Examples for Dynamic LINQ that allows you to use a SQL-like string (e.g. OrderBy("Name, Age DESC")) for ordering. Unfortunately, the method included only works on IQueryable<T>. Is there any way to get this functionality on IEnumerable<T>?

Just stumbled into this oldie...
To do this without the dynamic LINQ library, you just need the code as below. This covers most common scenarios including nested properties.
To get it working with IEnumerable<T> you could add some wrapper methods that go via AsQueryable - but the code below is the core Expression logic needed.
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderByDescending<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderByDescending");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(
this IOrderedQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenByDescending<T>(
this IOrderedQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenByDescending");
}
static IOrderedQueryable<T> ApplyOrder<T>(
IQueryable<T> source,
string property,
string methodName)
{
string[] props = property.Split('.');
Type type = typeof(T);
ParameterExpression arg = Expression.Parameter(type, "x");
Expression expr = arg;
foreach(string prop in props) {
// use reflection (not ComponentModel) to mirror LINQ
PropertyInfo pi = type.GetProperty(prop);
expr = Expression.Property(expr, pi);
type = pi.PropertyType;
}
Type delegateType = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(T), type);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(delegateType, expr, arg);
object result = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] {source, lambda});
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)result;
}
Edit: it gets more fun if you want to mix that with dynamic - although note that dynamic only applies to LINQ-to-Objects (expression-trees for ORMs etc can't really represent dynamic queries - MemberExpression doesn't support it). But here's a way to do it with LINQ-to-Objects. Note that the choice of Hashtable is due to favorable locking semantics:
using Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder;
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Dynamic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
static class Program
{
private static class AccessorCache
{
private static readonly Hashtable accessors = new Hashtable();
private static readonly Hashtable callSites = new Hashtable();
private static CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>> GetCallSiteLocked(
string name)
{
var callSite = (CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>)callSites[name];
if(callSite == null)
{
callSites[name] = callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>
.Create(Binder.GetMember(
CSharpBinderFlags.None,
name,
typeof(AccessorCache),
new CSharpArgumentInfo[] {
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(
CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None,
null)
}));
}
return callSite;
}
internal static Func<dynamic,object> GetAccessor(string name)
{
Func<dynamic, object> accessor = (Func<dynamic, object>)accessors[name];
if (accessor == null)
{
lock (accessors )
{
accessor = (Func<dynamic, object>)accessors[name];
if (accessor == null)
{
if(name.IndexOf('.') >= 0) {
string[] props = name.Split('.');
CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>[] arr
= Array.ConvertAll(props, GetCallSiteLocked);
accessor = target =>
{
object val = (object)target;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
{
var cs = arr[i];
val = cs.Target(cs, val);
}
return val;
};
} else {
var callSite = GetCallSiteLocked(name);
accessor = target =>
{
return callSite.Target(callSite, (object)target);
};
}
accessors[name] = accessor;
}
}
}
return accessor;
}
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> OrderBy(
this IEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.OrderBy<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> OrderByDescending(
this IEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.OrderByDescending<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> ThenBy(
this IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.ThenBy<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> ThenByDescending(
this IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.ThenByDescending<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
static void Main()
{
dynamic a = new ExpandoObject(),
b = new ExpandoObject(),
c = new ExpandoObject();
a.X = "abc";
b.X = "ghi";
c.X = "def";
dynamic[] data = new[] {
new { Y = a },
new { Y = b },
new { Y = c }
};
var ordered = data.OrderByDescending("Y.X").ToArray();
foreach (var obj in ordered)
{
Console.WriteLine(obj.Y.X);
}
}
}

Too easy without any complication:
Add using System.Linq.Dynamic; at the top.
Use vehicles = vehicles.AsQueryable().OrderBy("Make ASC, Year DESC").ToList();
Edit: to save some time, the System.Linq.Dynamic.Core (System.Linq.Dynamic is deprecated) assembly is not part of the framework, but can be installed from nuget: System.Linq.Dynamic.Core

Just stumbled across this question.
Using Marc's ApplyOrder implementation from above, I slapped together an Extension method that handles SQL-like strings like:
list.OrderBy("MyProperty DESC, MyOtherProperty ASC");
Details can be found here: http://aonnull.blogspot.com/2010/08/dynamic-sql-like-linq-orderby-extension.html

I guess it would work to use reflection to get whatever property you want to sort on:
IEnumerable<T> myEnumerables
var query=from enumerable in myenumerables
where some criteria
orderby GetPropertyValue(enumerable,"SomeProperty")
select enumerable
private static object GetPropertyValue(object obj, string property)
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo propertyInfo=obj.GetType().GetProperty(property);
return propertyInfo.GetValue(obj, null);
}
Note that using reflection is considerably slower than accessing the property directly, so the performance would have to be investigated.

Just building on what others have said. I found that the following works quite well.
public static IEnumerable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> input, string queryString)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(queryString))
return input;
int i = 0;
foreach (string propname in queryString.Split(','))
{
var subContent = propname.Split('|');
if (Convert.ToInt32(subContent[1].Trim()) == 0)
{
if (i == 0)
input = input.OrderBy(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
else
input = ((IOrderedEnumerable<T>)input).ThenBy(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
}
else
{
if (i == 0)
input = input.OrderByDescending(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
else
input = ((IOrderedEnumerable<T>)input).ThenByDescending(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
}
i++;
}
return input;
}

I was trying to do this but having problems with Kjetil Watnedal's solution because I don't use the inline linq syntax - I prefer method-style syntax. My specific problem was in trying to do dynamic sorting using a custom IComparer.
My solution ended up like this:
Given an IQueryable query like so:
List<DATA__Security__Team> teams = TeamManager.GetTeams();
var query = teams.Where(team => team.ID < 10).AsQueryable();
And given a run-time sort field argument:
string SortField; // Set at run-time to "Name"
The dynamic OrderBy looks like so:
query = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetReflectedPropertyValue(SortField));
And that's using a little helper method called GetReflectedPropertyValue():
public static string GetReflectedPropertyValue(this object subject, string field)
{
object reflectedValue = subject.GetType().GetProperty(field).GetValue(subject, null);
return reflectedValue != null ? reflectedValue.ToString() : "";
}
One last thing - I mentioned that I wanted the OrderBy to use custom IComparer - because I wanted to do Natural sorting.
To do that, I just alter the OrderBy to:
query = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetReflectedPropertyValue(SortField), new NaturalSortComparer<string>());
See this post for the code for NaturalSortComparer().

I've stumble this question looking for Linq multiple orderby clauses
and maybe this was what the author was looking for
Here's how to do that:
var query = pets.OrderBy(pet => pet.Name).ThenByDescending(pet => pet.Age);

Use dynamic linq
just add using System.Linq.Dynamic;
And use it like this to order all your columns:
string sortTypeStr = "ASC"; // or DESC
string SortColumnName = "Age"; // Your column name
query = query.OrderBy($"{SortColumnName} {sortTypeStr}");

After a lot of searching this worked for me:
public static IEnumerable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IEnumerable<TEntity> source,
string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command,
new[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.AsQueryable().Expression,
Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.AsQueryable().Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}

First Install Dynamic
Tools --> NuGet Package Manager --> Package Manager Console
install-package System.Linq.Dynamic
Add Namespace using System.Linq.Dynamic;
Now you can use OrderBy("Name, Age DESC")

You could add it:
public static IEnumerable<T> OrderBy( this IEnumerable<T> input, string queryString) {
//parse the string into property names
//Use reflection to get and sort by properties
//something like
foreach( string propname in queryString.Split(','))
input.OrderBy( x => GetPropertyValue( x, propname ) );
// I used Kjetil Watnedal's reflection example
}
The GetPropertyValue function is from Kjetil Watnedal's answer
The issue would be why? Any such sort would throw exceptions at run-time, rather than compile time (like D2VIANT's answer).
If you're dealing with Linq to Sql and the orderby is an expression tree it will be converted into SQL for execution anyway.

Here's something else I found interesting.
If your source is a DataTable, you can use dynamic sorting without using Dynamic Linq
DataTable orders = dataSet.Tables["SalesOrderHeader"];
EnumerableRowCollection<DataRow> query = from order in orders.AsEnumerable()
orderby order.Field<DateTime>("OrderDate")
select order;
DataView view = query.AsDataView();
bindingSource1.DataSource = view;
reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb669083.aspx (Using DataSetExtensions)
Here is one more way to do it by converting it to a DataView:
DataTable contacts = dataSet.Tables["Contact"];
DataView view = contacts.AsDataView();
view.Sort = "LastName desc, FirstName asc";
bindingSource1.DataSource = view;
dataGridView1.AutoResizeColumns();

You can convert the IEnumerable to IQueryable.
items = items.AsQueryable().OrderBy("Name ASC");

An alternate solution uses the following class/interface. It's not truly dynamic, but it works.
public interface IID
{
int ID
{
get; set;
}
}
public static class Utils
{
public static int GetID<T>(ObjectQuery<T> items) where T:EntityObject, IID
{
if (items.Count() == 0) return 1;
return items.OrderByDescending(u => u.ID).FirstOrDefault().ID + 1;
}
}

Thanks to Maarten (Query a collection using PropertyInfo object in LINQ) I got this solution:
myList.OrderByDescending(x => myPropertyInfo.GetValue(x, null)).ToList();
In my case I was working on a "ColumnHeaderMouseClick" (WindowsForm) so just found the specific Column pressed and its correspondent PropertyInfo:
foreach (PropertyInfo column in (new Process()).GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (column.Name == dgvProcessList.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Name)
{}
}
OR
PropertyInfo column = (new Process()).GetType().GetProperties().Where(x => x.Name == dgvProcessList.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Name).First();
(be sure to have your column Names matching the object Properties)
Cheers

You can use this:
public List<Book> Books(string orderField, bool desc, int skip, int take)
{
var propertyInfo = typeof(Book).GetProperty(orderField);
return _context.Books
.Where(...)
.OrderBy(p => !desc ? propertyInfo.GetValue(p, null) : 0)
.ThenByDescending(p => desc ? propertyInfo.GetValue(p, null) : 0)
.Skip(skip)
.Take(take)
.ToList();
}

This answer is a response to the comments that need an example for the solution provided by #John Sheehan - Runscope
Please provide an example for the rest of us.
in DAL (Data Access Layer),
The IEnumerable version:
public IEnumerable<Order> GetOrders()
{
// i use Dapper to return IEnumerable<T> using Query<T>
//.. do stuff
return orders // IEnumerable<Order>
}
The IQueryable version
public IQueryable<Order> GetOrdersAsQuerable()
{
IEnumerable<Order> qry= GetOrders();
// use the built-in extension method AsQueryable in System.Linq namespace
return qry.AsQueryable();
}
Now you can use the IQueryable version to bind, for example GridView in Asp.net and benefit for sorting (you can't sort using IEnumerable version)
I used Dapper as ORM and build IQueryable version and utilized sorting in GridView in asp.net so easy.

You can define a dictionary from string to Func<> like this :
Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>> SortParameters = new Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>>()
{
{"Rank", x => x.Rank}
};
And use it like this :
yourList.OrderBy(SortParameters["Rank"]);
In this case you can dynamically sort by string.

you can do it like this for multiple order by
IOrderedEnumerable<JToken> sort;
if (query.OrderBys[0].IsDESC)
{
sort = jarry.OrderByDescending(r => (string)r[query.OrderBys[0].Key]);
}
else
{
sort = jarry.OrderBy(r =>
(string) r[query.OrderBys[0].Key]);
}
foreach (var item in query.OrderBys.Skip(1))
{
if (item.IsDESC)
{
sort = sort.ThenByDescending(r => (string)r[item.Key]);
}
else
{
sort = sort.ThenBy(r => (string)r[item.Key]);
}
}

Convert List to IEnumerable or Iquerable, add using System.LINQ.Dynamic namespace, then u can mention the property names in comma seperated string to OrderBy Method which comes by default from System.LINQ.Dynamic.

I am able to do this with the code below. No need write long and complex code.
protected void sort_array(string field_name, string asc_desc)
{
objArrayList= Sort(objArrayList, field_name, asc_desc);
}
protected List<ArrayType> Sort(List<ArrayType> input, string property, string asc_desc)
{
if (asc_desc == "ASC")
{
return input.OrderBy(p => p.GetType()
.GetProperty(property)
.GetValue(p, null)).ToList();
}
else
{
return input.OrderByDescending(p => p.GetType()
.GetProperty(property)
.GetValue(p, null)).ToList();
}
}

If you are using Specification (such as Ardalis Specification)
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
namespace TestExtensions;
public static class IQueryableExtensions
{
public static void ApplyOrder<T>(ISpecificationBuilder<T> query, string propertyName, bool ascendingOrder)
{
if (ascendingOrder)
query.OrderBy(T => EF.Property<object>(T!, propertyName));
else
query.OrderByDescending(T => EF.Property<object>(T!, propertyName));
}
}

With Net6 and EF
.AsQueryable().OrderBy((ColumnOrder.Column, ColumnOrder.Dir));

var result1 = lst.OrderBy(a=>a.Name);// for ascending order.
var result1 = lst.OrderByDescending(a=>a.Name);// for desc order.

Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>

I found an example in the VS2008 Examples for Dynamic LINQ that allows you to use a SQL-like string (e.g. OrderBy("Name, Age DESC")) for ordering. Unfortunately, the method included only works on IQueryable<T>. Is there any way to get this functionality on IEnumerable<T>?

Just stumbled into this oldie...
To do this without the dynamic LINQ library, you just need the code as below. This covers most common scenarios including nested properties.
To get it working with IEnumerable<T> you could add some wrapper methods that go via AsQueryable - but the code below is the core Expression logic needed.
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderByDescending<T>(
this IQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "OrderByDescending");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(
this IOrderedQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenBy");
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenByDescending<T>(
this IOrderedQueryable<T> source,
string property)
{
return ApplyOrder<T>(source, property, "ThenByDescending");
}
static IOrderedQueryable<T> ApplyOrder<T>(
IQueryable<T> source,
string property,
string methodName)
{
string[] props = property.Split('.');
Type type = typeof(T);
ParameterExpression arg = Expression.Parameter(type, "x");
Expression expr = arg;
foreach(string prop in props) {
// use reflection (not ComponentModel) to mirror LINQ
PropertyInfo pi = type.GetProperty(prop);
expr = Expression.Property(expr, pi);
type = pi.PropertyType;
}
Type delegateType = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(T), type);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(delegateType, expr, arg);
object result = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
method => method.Name == methodName
&& method.IsGenericMethodDefinition
&& method.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2
&& method.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), type)
.Invoke(null, new object[] {source, lambda});
return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)result;
}
Edit: it gets more fun if you want to mix that with dynamic - although note that dynamic only applies to LINQ-to-Objects (expression-trees for ORMs etc can't really represent dynamic queries - MemberExpression doesn't support it). But here's a way to do it with LINQ-to-Objects. Note that the choice of Hashtable is due to favorable locking semantics:
using Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder;
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Dynamic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
static class Program
{
private static class AccessorCache
{
private static readonly Hashtable accessors = new Hashtable();
private static readonly Hashtable callSites = new Hashtable();
private static CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>> GetCallSiteLocked(
string name)
{
var callSite = (CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>)callSites[name];
if(callSite == null)
{
callSites[name] = callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>
.Create(Binder.GetMember(
CSharpBinderFlags.None,
name,
typeof(AccessorCache),
new CSharpArgumentInfo[] {
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(
CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None,
null)
}));
}
return callSite;
}
internal static Func<dynamic,object> GetAccessor(string name)
{
Func<dynamic, object> accessor = (Func<dynamic, object>)accessors[name];
if (accessor == null)
{
lock (accessors )
{
accessor = (Func<dynamic, object>)accessors[name];
if (accessor == null)
{
if(name.IndexOf('.') >= 0) {
string[] props = name.Split('.');
CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>[] arr
= Array.ConvertAll(props, GetCallSiteLocked);
accessor = target =>
{
object val = (object)target;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
{
var cs = arr[i];
val = cs.Target(cs, val);
}
return val;
};
} else {
var callSite = GetCallSiteLocked(name);
accessor = target =>
{
return callSite.Target(callSite, (object)target);
};
}
accessors[name] = accessor;
}
}
}
return accessor;
}
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> OrderBy(
this IEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.OrderBy<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> OrderByDescending(
this IEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.OrderByDescending<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> ThenBy(
this IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.ThenBy<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> ThenByDescending(
this IOrderedEnumerable<dynamic> source,
string property)
{
return Enumerable.ThenByDescending<dynamic, object>(
source,
AccessorCache.GetAccessor(property),
Comparer<object>.Default);
}
static void Main()
{
dynamic a = new ExpandoObject(),
b = new ExpandoObject(),
c = new ExpandoObject();
a.X = "abc";
b.X = "ghi";
c.X = "def";
dynamic[] data = new[] {
new { Y = a },
new { Y = b },
new { Y = c }
};
var ordered = data.OrderByDescending("Y.X").ToArray();
foreach (var obj in ordered)
{
Console.WriteLine(obj.Y.X);
}
}
}

Too easy without any complication:
Add using System.Linq.Dynamic; at the top.
Use vehicles = vehicles.AsQueryable().OrderBy("Make ASC, Year DESC").ToList();
Edit: to save some time, the System.Linq.Dynamic.Core (System.Linq.Dynamic is deprecated) assembly is not part of the framework, but can be installed from nuget: System.Linq.Dynamic.Core

Just stumbled across this question.
Using Marc's ApplyOrder implementation from above, I slapped together an Extension method that handles SQL-like strings like:
list.OrderBy("MyProperty DESC, MyOtherProperty ASC");
Details can be found here: http://aonnull.blogspot.com/2010/08/dynamic-sql-like-linq-orderby-extension.html

I guess it would work to use reflection to get whatever property you want to sort on:
IEnumerable<T> myEnumerables
var query=from enumerable in myenumerables
where some criteria
orderby GetPropertyValue(enumerable,"SomeProperty")
select enumerable
private static object GetPropertyValue(object obj, string property)
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo propertyInfo=obj.GetType().GetProperty(property);
return propertyInfo.GetValue(obj, null);
}
Note that using reflection is considerably slower than accessing the property directly, so the performance would have to be investigated.

Just building on what others have said. I found that the following works quite well.
public static IEnumerable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IEnumerable<T> input, string queryString)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(queryString))
return input;
int i = 0;
foreach (string propname in queryString.Split(','))
{
var subContent = propname.Split('|');
if (Convert.ToInt32(subContent[1].Trim()) == 0)
{
if (i == 0)
input = input.OrderBy(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
else
input = ((IOrderedEnumerable<T>)input).ThenBy(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
}
else
{
if (i == 0)
input = input.OrderByDescending(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
else
input = ((IOrderedEnumerable<T>)input).ThenByDescending(x => GetPropertyValue(x, subContent[0].Trim()));
}
i++;
}
return input;
}

I was trying to do this but having problems with Kjetil Watnedal's solution because I don't use the inline linq syntax - I prefer method-style syntax. My specific problem was in trying to do dynamic sorting using a custom IComparer.
My solution ended up like this:
Given an IQueryable query like so:
List<DATA__Security__Team> teams = TeamManager.GetTeams();
var query = teams.Where(team => team.ID < 10).AsQueryable();
And given a run-time sort field argument:
string SortField; // Set at run-time to "Name"
The dynamic OrderBy looks like so:
query = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetReflectedPropertyValue(SortField));
And that's using a little helper method called GetReflectedPropertyValue():
public static string GetReflectedPropertyValue(this object subject, string field)
{
object reflectedValue = subject.GetType().GetProperty(field).GetValue(subject, null);
return reflectedValue != null ? reflectedValue.ToString() : "";
}
One last thing - I mentioned that I wanted the OrderBy to use custom IComparer - because I wanted to do Natural sorting.
To do that, I just alter the OrderBy to:
query = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetReflectedPropertyValue(SortField), new NaturalSortComparer<string>());
See this post for the code for NaturalSortComparer().

I've stumble this question looking for Linq multiple orderby clauses
and maybe this was what the author was looking for
Here's how to do that:
var query = pets.OrderBy(pet => pet.Name).ThenByDescending(pet => pet.Age);

Use dynamic linq
just add using System.Linq.Dynamic;
And use it like this to order all your columns:
string sortTypeStr = "ASC"; // or DESC
string SortColumnName = "Age"; // Your column name
query = query.OrderBy($"{SortColumnName} {sortTypeStr}");

After a lot of searching this worked for me:
public static IEnumerable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IEnumerable<TEntity> source,
string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command,
new[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.AsQueryable().Expression,
Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.AsQueryable().Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}

First Install Dynamic
Tools --> NuGet Package Manager --> Package Manager Console
install-package System.Linq.Dynamic
Add Namespace using System.Linq.Dynamic;
Now you can use OrderBy("Name, Age DESC")

You could add it:
public static IEnumerable<T> OrderBy( this IEnumerable<T> input, string queryString) {
//parse the string into property names
//Use reflection to get and sort by properties
//something like
foreach( string propname in queryString.Split(','))
input.OrderBy( x => GetPropertyValue( x, propname ) );
// I used Kjetil Watnedal's reflection example
}
The GetPropertyValue function is from Kjetil Watnedal's answer
The issue would be why? Any such sort would throw exceptions at run-time, rather than compile time (like D2VIANT's answer).
If you're dealing with Linq to Sql and the orderby is an expression tree it will be converted into SQL for execution anyway.

Here's something else I found interesting.
If your source is a DataTable, you can use dynamic sorting without using Dynamic Linq
DataTable orders = dataSet.Tables["SalesOrderHeader"];
EnumerableRowCollection<DataRow> query = from order in orders.AsEnumerable()
orderby order.Field<DateTime>("OrderDate")
select order;
DataView view = query.AsDataView();
bindingSource1.DataSource = view;
reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb669083.aspx (Using DataSetExtensions)
Here is one more way to do it by converting it to a DataView:
DataTable contacts = dataSet.Tables["Contact"];
DataView view = contacts.AsDataView();
view.Sort = "LastName desc, FirstName asc";
bindingSource1.DataSource = view;
dataGridView1.AutoResizeColumns();

You can convert the IEnumerable to IQueryable.
items = items.AsQueryable().OrderBy("Name ASC");

An alternate solution uses the following class/interface. It's not truly dynamic, but it works.
public interface IID
{
int ID
{
get; set;
}
}
public static class Utils
{
public static int GetID<T>(ObjectQuery<T> items) where T:EntityObject, IID
{
if (items.Count() == 0) return 1;
return items.OrderByDescending(u => u.ID).FirstOrDefault().ID + 1;
}
}

Thanks to Maarten (Query a collection using PropertyInfo object in LINQ) I got this solution:
myList.OrderByDescending(x => myPropertyInfo.GetValue(x, null)).ToList();
In my case I was working on a "ColumnHeaderMouseClick" (WindowsForm) so just found the specific Column pressed and its correspondent PropertyInfo:
foreach (PropertyInfo column in (new Process()).GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (column.Name == dgvProcessList.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Name)
{}
}
OR
PropertyInfo column = (new Process()).GetType().GetProperties().Where(x => x.Name == dgvProcessList.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Name).First();
(be sure to have your column Names matching the object Properties)
Cheers

You can use this:
public List<Book> Books(string orderField, bool desc, int skip, int take)
{
var propertyInfo = typeof(Book).GetProperty(orderField);
return _context.Books
.Where(...)
.OrderBy(p => !desc ? propertyInfo.GetValue(p, null) : 0)
.ThenByDescending(p => desc ? propertyInfo.GetValue(p, null) : 0)
.Skip(skip)
.Take(take)
.ToList();
}

This answer is a response to the comments that need an example for the solution provided by #John Sheehan - Runscope
Please provide an example for the rest of us.
in DAL (Data Access Layer),
The IEnumerable version:
public IEnumerable<Order> GetOrders()
{
// i use Dapper to return IEnumerable<T> using Query<T>
//.. do stuff
return orders // IEnumerable<Order>
}
The IQueryable version
public IQueryable<Order> GetOrdersAsQuerable()
{
IEnumerable<Order> qry= GetOrders();
// use the built-in extension method AsQueryable in System.Linq namespace
return qry.AsQueryable();
}
Now you can use the IQueryable version to bind, for example GridView in Asp.net and benefit for sorting (you can't sort using IEnumerable version)
I used Dapper as ORM and build IQueryable version and utilized sorting in GridView in asp.net so easy.

You can define a dictionary from string to Func<> like this :
Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>> SortParameters = new Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>>()
{
{"Rank", x => x.Rank}
};
And use it like this :
yourList.OrderBy(SortParameters["Rank"]);
In this case you can dynamically sort by string.

you can do it like this for multiple order by
IOrderedEnumerable<JToken> sort;
if (query.OrderBys[0].IsDESC)
{
sort = jarry.OrderByDescending(r => (string)r[query.OrderBys[0].Key]);
}
else
{
sort = jarry.OrderBy(r =>
(string) r[query.OrderBys[0].Key]);
}
foreach (var item in query.OrderBys.Skip(1))
{
if (item.IsDESC)
{
sort = sort.ThenByDescending(r => (string)r[item.Key]);
}
else
{
sort = sort.ThenBy(r => (string)r[item.Key]);
}
}

Convert List to IEnumerable or Iquerable, add using System.LINQ.Dynamic namespace, then u can mention the property names in comma seperated string to OrderBy Method which comes by default from System.LINQ.Dynamic.

I am able to do this with the code below. No need write long and complex code.
protected void sort_array(string field_name, string asc_desc)
{
objArrayList= Sort(objArrayList, field_name, asc_desc);
}
protected List<ArrayType> Sort(List<ArrayType> input, string property, string asc_desc)
{
if (asc_desc == "ASC")
{
return input.OrderBy(p => p.GetType()
.GetProperty(property)
.GetValue(p, null)).ToList();
}
else
{
return input.OrderByDescending(p => p.GetType()
.GetProperty(property)
.GetValue(p, null)).ToList();
}
}

If you are using Specification (such as Ardalis Specification)
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
namespace TestExtensions;
public static class IQueryableExtensions
{
public static void ApplyOrder<T>(ISpecificationBuilder<T> query, string propertyName, bool ascendingOrder)
{
if (ascendingOrder)
query.OrderBy(T => EF.Property<object>(T!, propertyName));
else
query.OrderByDescending(T => EF.Property<object>(T!, propertyName));
}
}

With Net6 and EF
.AsQueryable().OrderBy((ColumnOrder.Column, ColumnOrder.Dir));

var result1 = lst.OrderBy(a=>a.Name);// for ascending order.
var result1 = lst.OrderByDescending(a=>a.Name);// for desc order.

We Keep Coding

C# (C-Sharp) is a programming language developed by Microsoft that runs on the .NET Framework.

IEnumerable OrderBy by String with complex property - c#

Related

C# - Order By property by reflection [duplicate]

Dynamic Order By On Date With Entity Framework and Linq

Keep NULL rows last on Dynamic Linq Order By

Improve sorting with linq [duplicate]

Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>

Categories

Resources