I am using this LINQ to Entity:
var t1 = (from cn in contracts
join cl in client on cn.Id equals cl.Id
join so in siteObject on cn.Id equals so.ContractId
select new
{
siteObjId = so.Id,
clientId = cl.Id,
}).ToList();
t1 have this list:
Is there any elegant way using (for example LINQ) to create from the list above (t1), new list like that:
You could group by statement the items. For each item of result, you could concat the result group using string.Join(separator, collection) to get a result like 1,2,3. But, first, given you are using Linq To Entities, first, try to execute a simple query grouping values. For sample:
var groupResult = (from cn in contracts
join cl in client on cn.Id equals cl.Id
join so in siteObject on cn.Id equals so.ContractId
group cl by cl.Id into g
select new {
ClientId = g.Key,
Result = g
}).ToList();
And use Linq To Objects with the groupResult list, to join the values into a string, for sample:
var t1= (from item in groupResult
select new {
clientId = item.ClientId,
siteObjId = string.Join(",", item.ToList()),
});
You want the group by operator:
(from x in t1
group x b x.ClientId into g
select new
{
ClientId = g.Key,
ModelIds = g.ToList()
}).ToList()
Related
I need to convert the following complicated sql query to Linq in C#:
Select Empleador.NombreComercial as Empresa,
Vacante.Puesto as Vacante,
Vacante.Actividades,
COUNT(Vacante.CveVacante) as Visitas
from Vacante
LEFT JOIN Empleador on Empleador.CveEmpleador=Vacante.CveEmpleador
LEFT JOIN VisitaVacante on Vacante.CveVacante = VisitaVacante.CveVacante
GROUP BY Empleador.NombreComercial,Vacante.Puesto, Vacante.Actividades,
Vacante.CveVacante HAVING COUNT(*) > 1 ORDER BY Visitas DESC
For the moment I already have the following:
var Visitas = (from tvacante in db.VacanteT
join tEmpleador in db.EmpleadorT on tvacante.CveEmpleador equals tEmpleador.CveEmpleador
join tVisitaVacante in db.VisitaVacanteT on tvacante.CveVacante equals tVisitaVacante.CveVacante
select new
{
Empresa = tEmpleador.NombreComercial,
Vacante = tvacante.Puesto,
tvacante.Actividades,
Visitas = tvacante.CveVacante
}).GroupBy( );
How can I add the COUNT(Vacante.CveVacante) as Visitas and also the
GROUP BY Empleador.NombreComercial,Vacante.Puesto, Vacante.Actividades,
Vacante.CveVacante HAVING COUNT(*) > 1 ORDER BY Visitas DESC
to my linq query? I can't find information about how to complete this. The tables are tvacante, templeador, and tvisitaVacante.
Try this:
var Visitas =(from tvacante in db.VacanteT
join tEmpleador in db.EmpleadorT on tvacante.CveEmpleador equals tEmpleador.CveEmpleador
join tVisitaVacante in db.VisitaVacanteT on tvacante.CveVacante equals tVisitaVacante.CveVacante
group new{tEmpleador.NombreComercial,tvacante.Puesto, tvacante.Actividades} by new {tEmpleador.NombreComercial,tvacante.Puesto, tvacante.Actividades} into g
where g.Count()>1
select new
{
Empresa = g.Key.tEmpleador.NombreComercial,
Vacante = g.Key.tvacante.Puesto,
Actividades= g.Key.tvacante.Actividades,
Visitas = g.Count()
}).OrderByDescending(e=>e.Visitas);
If you want to do it using only linq query syntax and not merging both syntax then you could also do this:
var Visitas = from tvacante in db.VacanteT
join tEmpleador in db.EmpleadorT on tvacante.CveEmpleador equals tEmpleador.CveEmpleador
join tVisitaVacante in db.VisitaVacanteT on tvacante.CveVacante equals tVisitaVacante.CveVacante
group new{tEmpleador.NombreComercial,tvacante.Puesto, tvacante.Actividades} by new {tEmpleador.NombreComercial,tvacante.Puesto, tvacante.Actividades} into g
where g.Count()>1
orderby g.Count() descending
select new
{
Empresa = g.Key.tEmpleador.NombreComercial,
Vacante = g.Key.tvacante.Puesto,
Actividades= g.Key.tvacante.Actividades,
Visitas = g.Count()
};
I'm writing a LINQ to SQL statement, and I'm after the standard syntax for a normal inner join with an ON clause in C#.
How do you represent the following in LINQ to SQL:
select DealerContact.*
from Dealer
inner join DealerContact on Dealer.DealerID = DealerContact.DealerID
It goes something like:
from t1 in db.Table1
join t2 in db.Table2 on t1.field equals t2.field
select new { t1.field2, t2.field3}
It would be nice to have sensible names and fields for your tables for a better example. :)
Update
I think for your query this might be more appropriate:
var dealercontacts = from contact in DealerContact
join dealer in Dealer on contact.DealerId equals dealer.ID
select contact;
Since you are looking for the contacts, not the dealers.
And because I prefer the expression chain syntax, here is how you do it with that:
var dealerContracts = DealerContact.Join(Dealer,
contact => contact.DealerId,
dealer => dealer.DealerId,
(contact, dealer) => contact);
To extend the expression chain syntax answer by Clever Human:
If you wanted to do things (like filter or select) on fields from both tables being joined together -- instead on just one of those two tables -- you could create a new object in the lambda expression of the final parameter to the Join method incorporating both of those tables, for example:
var dealerInfo = DealerContact.Join(Dealer,
dc => dc.DealerId,
d => d.DealerId,
(dc, d) => new { DealerContact = dc, Dealer = d })
.Where(dc_d => dc_d.Dealer.FirstName == "Glenn"
&& dc_d.DealerContact.City == "Chicago")
.Select(dc_d => new {
dc_d.Dealer.DealerID,
dc_d.Dealer.FirstName,
dc_d.Dealer.LastName,
dc_d.DealerContact.City,
dc_d.DealerContact.State });
The interesting part is the lambda expression in line 4 of that example:
(dc, d) => new { DealerContact = dc, Dealer = d }
...where we construct a new anonymous-type object which has as properties the DealerContact and Dealer records, along with all of their fields.
We can then use fields from those records as we filter and select the results, as demonstrated by the remainder of the example, which uses dc_d as a name for the anonymous object we built which has both the DealerContact and Dealer records as its properties.
var results = from c in db.Companies
join cn in db.Countries on c.CountryID equals cn.ID
join ct in db.Cities on c.CityID equals ct.ID
join sect in db.Sectors on c.SectorID equals sect.ID
where (c.CountryID == cn.ID) && (c.CityID == ct.ID) && (c.SectorID == company.SectorID) && (company.SectorID == sect.ID)
select new { country = cn.Name, city = ct.Name, c.ID, c.Name, c.Address1, c.Address2, c.Address3, c.CountryID, c.CityID, c.Region, c.PostCode, c.Telephone, c.Website, c.SectorID, Status = (ContactStatus)c.StatusID, sector = sect.Name };
return results.ToList();
You create a foreign key, and LINQ-to-SQL creates navigation properties for you. Each Dealer will then have a collection of DealerContacts which you can select, filter, and manipulate.
from contact in dealer.DealerContacts select contact
or
context.Dealers.Select(d => d.DealerContacts)
If you're not using navigation properties, you're missing out one of the main benefits on LINQ-to-SQL - the part that maps the object graph.
Use Linq Join operator:
var q = from d in Dealer
join dc in DealerConact on d.DealerID equals dc.DealerID
select dc;
basically LINQ join operator provides no benefit for SQL. I.e. the following query
var r = from dealer in db.Dealers
from contact in db.DealerContact
where dealer.DealerID == contact.DealerID
select dealerContact;
will result in INNER JOIN in SQL
join is useful for IEnumerable<> because it is more efficient:
from contact in db.DealerContact
clause would be re-executed for every dealer
But for IQueryable<> it is not the case. Also join is less flexible.
Actually, often it is better not to join, in linq that is. When there are navigation properties a very succinct way to write your linq statement is:
from dealer in db.Dealers
from contact in dealer.DealerContacts
select new { whatever you need from dealer or contact }
It translates to a where clause:
SELECT <columns>
FROM Dealer, DealerContact
WHERE Dealer.DealerID = DealerContact.DealerID
Inner join two tables in linq C#
var result = from q1 in table1
join q2 in table2
on q1.Customer_Id equals q2.Customer_Id
select new { q1.Name, q1.Mobile, q2.Purchase, q2.Dates }
Use LINQ joins to perform Inner Join.
var employeeInfo = from emp in db.Employees
join dept in db.Departments
on emp.Eid equals dept.Eid
select new
{
emp.Ename,
dept.Dname,
emp.Elocation
};
Try this :
var data =(from t1 in dataContext.Table1 join
t2 in dataContext.Table2 on
t1.field equals t2.field
orderby t1.Id select t1).ToList();
OperationDataContext odDataContext = new OperationDataContext();
var studentInfo = from student in odDataContext.STUDENTs
join course in odDataContext.COURSEs
on student.course_id equals course.course_id
select new { student.student_name, student.student_city, course.course_name, course.course_desc };
Where student and course tables have primary key and foreign key relationship
try instead this,
var dealer = from d in Dealer
join dc in DealerContact on d.DealerID equals dc.DealerID
select d;
var Data= (from dealer in Dealer join dealercontact in DealerContact on dealer.ID equals dealercontact.DealerID
select new{
dealer.Id,
dealercontact.ContactName
}).ToList();
var data=(from t in db.your tableName(t1)
join s in db.yourothertablename(t2) on t1.fieldname equals t2.feldname
(where condtion)).tolist();
var list = (from u in db.Users join c in db.Customers on u.CustomerId equals c.CustomerId where u.Username == username
select new {u.UserId, u.CustomerId, u.ClientId, u.RoleId, u.Username, u.Email, u.Password, u.Salt, u.Hint1, u.Hint2, u.Hint3, u.Locked, u.Active,c.ProfilePic}).First();
Write table names you want, and initialize the select to get the result of fields.
from d1 in DealerContrac join d2 in DealerContrac on d1.dealearid equals d2.dealerid select new {dealercontract.*}
One Best example
Table Names : TBL_Emp and TBL_Dep
var result = from emp in TBL_Emp join dep in TBL_Dep on emp.id=dep.id
select new
{
emp.Name;
emp.Address
dep.Department_Name
}
foreach(char item in result)
{ // to do}
I am trying to move from simple SQL to EF.
But there are some complex queries(joins) that it seems to hard to generate the linq for.
At first I tried to use sqltolinq tool to generate the linq but it gives error as some of the things are not supported in the query.
here is the linq:
var entryPoint = (from ep in dbContext.tbl_EntryPoint
join e in dbContext.tbl_Entry on ep.EID equals e.EID
join t in dbContext.tbl_Title on e.TID equals t.TID
where e.OwnerID == user.UID
select new {
UID = e.OwnerID,
TID = e.TID,
Title = t.Title,
EID = e.EID
});
The table entry has many entries that I would like to group and get the latest for each group. But then I would need to select into a view model object which will be bind to gridview.
I dont know where I can implement the logic to group by and get the latest from each and be able to get values from join table into viewModel object.
somewhere I need to add
group entry by new
{
entry.aID,
entry.bCode,
entry.Date,
entry.FCode
}
into groups
select groups.OrderByDescending(p => p.ID).First()
in the above linq to retrieve latest from each group.
You can insert group by right after the joins:
var query =
from ep in dbContext.tbl_EntryPoint
join e in dbContext.tbl_Entry on ep.EID equals e.EID
join t in dbContext.tbl_Title on e.TID equals t.TID
where e.OwnerID == user.UID
group new { ep, e, t } by new { e.aID, e.bCode, e.Date, e.FCode } into g
let r = g.OrderByDescending(x => x.e.ID).FirstOrDefault()
select new
{
UID = r.e.OwnerID,
TID = r.e.TID,
Title = r.t.Title,
EID = r.e.EID
};
The trick here is to include what you need after the grouping between group and by.
However, the above will be translated to CROSS APPLY with all joins included twice. If the grouping key contains fields from just one table, it could be better to perform the grouping/selecting the last grouping element first, and then join the result with the rest:
var query =
from e in (from e in dbContext.tbl_Entry
where e.OwnerID == user.UID
group e by new { e.aID, e.bCode, e.Date, e.FCode } into g
select g.OrderByDescending(e => e.ID).FirstOrDefault())
join ep in dbContext.tbl_EntryPoint on e.EID equals ep.EID
join t in dbContext.tbl_Title on e.TID equals t.TID
select new
{
UID = e.OwnerID,
TID = e.TID,
Title = t.Title,
EID = e.EID
};
Please anyone can help me to write this sql query into Linq. i have tried..
this is my sql query
select o.OrderID,o.Nature,o.Date,od.TotalPrice,os.OrderStatus,lo.FirstName,lo.EmailAddress,lo.PhoneNumber
from [dbo].[Order] o
inner join [dbo].[tbl_OrderDetails] od on od.OrderID = o.OrderID
inner join [dbo].[tbl_OrderHistory] oh on oh.OrderID = o.OrderID
inner join [dbo].[tbl_Login] lo on o.UserID = lo.UserID
inner join dbo.tbl_OrderStatus os on oh.OrderStatusID= os.OrderStatusID
group by o.OrderID,o.Nature,od.TotalPrice,o.Date,os.OrderStatus,lo.FirstName,lo.EmailAddress,lo.PhoneNumber
and this is my try
public override orderDetailModel orderDetails(int id)
{
var results = from o in obj.Orders
join od in obj.tbl_OrderDetails on o.OrderID equals od.OrderID
join oh in obj.tbl_OrderHistory on o.OrderID equals oh.OrderID
join l in obj.tbl_Login on o.UserID equals l.UserID
join os in obj.tbl_OrderStatus on oh.OrderStatusID equals os.OrderStatusID
where (od.OrderID == id)
group o by new { o.Nature, o.OrderID } into
select new orderDetailModel
{
OrderID = o.OrderID,
OrderStatus = os.OrderStatus,
Date = o.Date,
DeliveryNature = o.Nature,
EmailAddress = l.EmailAddress,
FirstName = l.FirstName,
PhoneNumber = l.PhoneNumber,
TotalPrice = od.TotalPrice
};
//group o by new {o.OrderID};
orderDetailModel data = (orderDetailModel)results.FirstOrDefault();
return data;
}
but this is wrong query its not working fine please help me
You need to correct the group by clause, like you have in the SQL query like this:-
group new { o, l } by new { o.OrderID,o.Nature,od.TotalPrice,o.Date,os.OrderStatus,
l.FirstName, l.EmailAddress,l.PhoneNumber } into g
select new orderDetailModel
{
OrderID = g.Key.OrderID,
OrderStatus = g.Key.OrderStatus,
Date = g.Key.Date,
..and so on
};
Since you need the grouping on two tables Order & tbl_Login you will have to first project them as anonymous type group new { o, l } then specify all the groupings and finally while projecting use Key to get the respective items.
I guess that actually, also the SQL query is not correct.
I would simply use a SELECT DISTINCT ... instead of Grouping all the columns.
Anyway, first thing to do:
Check if databases is designed correctly. As far as i can see, if you're joining the table with their Ids, i don't understand why you need to group all the data. If you have duplicates, maybe the error is in the Database design.
If you can't change your Database, or you are happy with it, then use the following LINQ approach:
var distinctKeys = allOrderDetails.Select(o => new { o.OrderID, o.Nature, o.TotalPrice, o.Date,o.OrderStatus,o.FirstName, o.EmailAddress,o.PhoneNumber }).Distinct();
var joined = from e in allOrderDetails
join d in distinctKeys
on new { o.OrderID, o.Nature,o.TotalPrice, o.Date,o.OrderStatus, o.FirstName, o.EmailAddress, o.PhoneNumber } equals d select e;
joined.ToList(); // gives you the distinct/grouped list
I'm trying to join few tables using LINQ and retrieve a data set. But my problem is when I group the tables, I cannot access the fields of the non grouped tables in the LINQ query. here is my sample code block. Please help
var query = from sb in db.Surfboards
join csb in db.CustomerSurfBoards on sb.SurfBoardID equals csb.SurfBoardID
join c in db.Customers on csb.CustomerID equals c.CustomerID
where c.IsActive
group new { sb,csb} by new {sb.ID, csb.ComponentId} into g
select new ReportModel()
{
ReceivedDate = g.First().Name,
Number = c.First().Number <------- this cannot be accessed
}
what I'm trying to achieve is something like this
select sb.Id, max(c.Number), cbs.Id from Surfboards as sb
inner join CustomerSurfBoards as cbs on sb.SurfBoardID = csb.SurfBoardID
inner join Customers as c on csb.CustomerID = c.CustomerID
group by sb.Id, csb.ComponentId
Try this:
var query = from sb in db.Surfboards
join csb in db.CustomerSurfBoards on sb.SurfBoardID equals csb.SurfBoardID
join c in db.Customers on csb.CustomerID equals c.CustomerID
where c.IsActive
select new {sb.id, c.number, cbs.componentid} into tmp
from t in tmp
group t by new {t.ID, t.ComponentId} into g
select new
{
g.Key.id, g.Key.componentid, number = g.Select(n=>n.number).OrderByDescending().FirstOrDefault()
}