How can I write the follow query with Linq in C#?
SELECT MAX(A2.LINHA_PLANILHA)
FROM MD_IMP_FORCA_VENDA_DADOS_A2 A2
WHERE A2.LINHA <> '0'
AND TRIM(A2.SETORES) IS NOT NULL
AND A2.LINHA_PLANILHA <> 1
AND USUARIO = V_USUARIO
GROUP BY A2.LINHA, A2.BRICK
HAVING COUNT(A2.BRICK) > 1 AND COUNT(DISTINCT A2.SETORES) > 1;
I thought to do this:
var result = from r in dataTable.AsEnumerable()
where r.Field<string>(1) != "0"
&& r.Field<string>(2).Trim() != null
&& r.Field<Int32>(0) != 1
group r by new {Linha = r.Field<string>(1), Brick = r.Field<string>(3) } into temp
where temp.Count() > 1
select new { MaxLinha = (from r2 in temp select r2.Field<Int32>(0)).Max()};
But I don't know how to put the two COUNTS of HAVING clause in Linq query.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Zago
Perhaps:
var query = db.MD_IMP_FORCA_VENDA_DADOS_A2
.Where(x => x.LINHA != "0"
&& x.SETORES != null
&& x.SETORES.Trim() != ""
&& x.LINHA_PLANILHA <> 1
&& x.USUARIO = x.V_USUARIO
)
.GroupBy(x => new { x.LINHA, x.BRICK })
.Where(g => g.Count() > 1 && g.Select(x => x.SETORES).Distinct().Count() > 1)
.Select(g => g.Max(x => x.LINHA_PLANILHA));
Related
I have the following lambda statement:
var resources = Db.Resource.Where(w => w.ResValue.Any(a => a.ApplicationFk == applicationPk) && w.CategoryFk == (categoryId ?? w.CategoryFk ) && w.IsEditable);
if (cultureIdsMissing!= null)
{
resources = resources.Where(w => w.ResValue.Any(a => cultureIdsMissing.Any(aa => aa == a.CultureFk) && a.Value == string.Empty));
}
This is not returning the result which I want, which is returned by:
SELECT Resource.ResourcePk, Resource.CategoryFk, Resource.Name, Resource.IsEditable, ResValue.ApplicatieFk, ResValue.CultureFk, ResValue.Value
FROM Resource
INNER JOIN ResValue ON Resource.ResourcePk = ResValue.ResourceFk
WHERE (ResValue.ApplicatieFk = 6)
AND (Resource.IsEditable = 1)
AND (ResValue.Value = '')
AND (ResValue.CultureFk = 1 OR ResValue.CultureFk = 2)
Not that cultureIdsMissing is a List containing both the numbers 1 and 2.
What am I missing or doing wrong with the lambda query?
I think you have to remove && w.CategoryFk == (categoryId ?? w.CategoryFk ) from your linq lemda expression. if categoryId = 1 then it will take only records with value 1. So try after remove that. Your linq code should be this.
var resources = Db.Resource.Where(w => w.ResValue.Any(a => a.ApplicationFk == applicationPk)&& w.IsEditable);
if (cultureIdsMissing!= null)
{
resources = resources.Where(w => w.ResValue.Any(a => cultureIdsMissing.Any(aa => aa == a.CultureFk) && a.Value == string.Empty));
}
You should take it from your sql statement :
Db.Resource
.Join(Db.ResValue
, rs => rs.ResourcePk
, resV => resv.resourceFk
, (rs, resv) => new { res = rs, resV = resV })
.Where(w => w.resv.ApplicatieFk == 6
&& w.res ==1
&& resv.Value == string.empty()
&& (resv.CultureFk == 1 || resv.CultureFk == 2))
It's not tested so maybe it won't work on first try.
I would translate the SQL to query comprehension syntax. In general, convert phrases in query comprehension order, use table aliases as range variables (or create range variables), and put unary/overall aggregate functions (such as TOP, DISTINCT or SUM) as function calls outside the whole query. For your SQL,
var ans = from r in Resource
where r.IsEditable == 1
join rv in ResValue on r.ResourcePk equals rv.ResourceFk
where rv.ApplicatieFk == 6 && rv.Value == "" && (rv.CultureFk == 1 || rv.CultureFk == 2)
select new { r.ResourcePk, r.CategoryFk, r.Name, r.IsEditable, rv.ApplicatieFk, rv.CultureFk, rv.Value };
I am doing the below linq query which is costing me a lot and this query is in a loop which I can not avoid and I have to do it in C# which also I can not avoid. I have lot of logic above the linq query and after the query. I wanted to check if I can change anything on the query to improve the performance at least a little bit.
lstDataTable.Where(i => i.Field<int>("ALLL_Snapshot_ID") == 20 &&
i.Field<int>("ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID") == 5 &&
i.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") > startingSnapshotDate &&
i.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") <= endingSnapshotDate &&
snapshotDataWithDate.Select(j => j.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")).Contains(i.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")) &&
snapshotDataWithDate.Select(j => j.Field<string>
("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")).Contains(i.Field<string>
("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")))
.Select(i => i.Field<Decimal>("BalanceOutstanding") + i.Field<Decimal>
("UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability")).Sum();
where lstDataTable and snapshotDataWithDate are IEnumerable of DataRow.
I tried above query using join but it is not joining properly. The difference between the two results is way high. Below is the query I tried using join
(from p in lstDataTable
join t in snapshotDataWithDate on p.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey") equals t.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey") &&
p.Field<string>("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey") equals
t.Field<string>("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")
where p.Field<int>("ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID") ==
SegmentGroupCECLSurvivalRateObj.ALLL_Segment_Group_Column_ID &&
p.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") > startingSnapshotDate &&
p.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") <= endingSnapshotDate
select p.Field<Decimal>("BalanceOutstanding") + p.Field<Decimal>
("UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability")).Sum();
Try this query, I have changed some expressions in where clause.
lstDataTable.Where(i => i.Field<int>("ALLL_Snapshot_ID") == 20 &&
i.Field<int>("ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID") == 5 &&
i.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") > startingSnapshotDate &&
i.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate") <= endingSnapshotDate &&
snapshotDataWithDate.Any(j => j.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey") == i.Field<string>
("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")) &&
snapshotDataWithDate.Any(j => j.Field<string>
("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey") == i.Field<string>
("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")))
.Select(i => i.Field<Decimal>("BalanceOutstanding") + i.Field<Decimal>
("UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability")).Sum();
Perhaps pulling out the Field accesses will provide a small amount of optimization?
var snapshotDataConvertedMDB = snapshotDataWithDate.Select(r => r.Field<string>("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")).ToList();
var snapshotDataConvertedODB = snapshotDataWithDate.Select(r => r.Field<string>("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey")).ToList();
var ans = lstDataTable
.Select(r => new {
ALLL_Snapshot_ID = r.Field<int>("ALLL_Snapshot_ID"),
ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID = r.Field<int>("ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID"),
OriginationDate = r.Field<DateTime>("OriginationDate"),
MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey = r.Field<string>("MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey"),
OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey = r.Field<string>("OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey"),
BalanceOutstanding = r.Field<Decimal>("BalanceOutstanding"),
UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability = r.Field<Decimal>("UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability")
})
.Where(i => i.ALLL_Snapshot_ID == 20 &&
i.ALLL_Analysis_Segment_Group_Column_ID == 5 &&
i.OriginationDate > startingSnapshotDate &&
i.OriginationDate <= endingSnapshotDate &&
snapshotDataConvertedMDB.Contains(i.MaturityDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey) &&
snapshotDataConvertedODB.Contains(i.OriginationDateBorrowerIdNoteNumberKey))
.Select(i => i.BalanceOutstanding + i.UndisbursedCommitmentAvailability)
.Sum();
I'm not sure how to do this since I'm only familiar with the basic form or Linq.
Here are my two sets of code:
var qry = from x in CustomersChecks.CustomersChecksList
where x.RoutingNumber == routingnumber &&
x.BankAccountNumber == bankAccountNumber &&
x.Branch > 0 &&
x.AccountNumber > 0
orderby x.Name
select x;
var qry2 = qry.GroupBy(x => new { x.Branch, x.AccountNumber}).Select(x => x.First()).ToList();
Ultimately, I want to get my first query in order of Branch + Account Number distinctly.
Can they be combined or is what I have the only way to do this?
The quick and dirty solution is just to add the GroupBy chain to the end of the first query.
var qry = (from x in CustomersChecks.CustomersChecksList
where x.RoutingNumber == routingnumber &&
x.BankAccountNumber == bankAccountNumber &&
x.Branch > 0 &&
x.AccountNumber > 0
orderby x.Name
select x).GroupBy(x => new { x.Branch, x.AccountNumber})
.Select(x => x.First())
.ToList();
Or do the following by incorrupating the group by into the exist query syntax
var qry = (from x in CustomersChecks.CustomersChecksList
where x.RoutingNumber == routingnumber &&
x.BankAccountNumber == bankAccountNumber &&
x.Branch > 0 &&
x.AccountNumber > 0
orderby x.Name
group x by new { x.Branch, x.AccountNumber} into grp
select grp.First()).ToList();
var qry = CustomersChecks.CustomersChecksList.Where(x =>
x.RoutingNumber == routingnumber &&
x.BankAccountNumber == bankAccountNumber &&
x.Branch > 0 &&
x.AccountNumber > 0).OrderBy(x => x.Name)
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Branch, x.AccountNumber})
.Select(x => x.First())
.ToList();
I am getting the following results for
string[] proj = Pid.Split(',');
"1032,1222" --> [0]=1032,[1]=1222
but I want to use in LINQ query. This is my LINQ query. Where to use it and how to use it?
string[] proj = Pid.Split(',');
var data2 = (from p in Db.emp.AsEnumerable()
join r in Db.use on p.EmployeeId equals r.EmployeeId
join q in Db.proo on p.EmployeeId equals q.EmpId
where (q.IsDelete == false && p.IsDelete == false && p.RoleID != 1 && p.RoleID != 2 && q.ProId == Convert.ToInt32(Pid))
select new GroupSelectedModel {
Text = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.TextInfo.ToTitleCase(p.FirstName + " " + p.LastName),
Value = r.UserId.ToString(),
StatusId = Convert.ToInt32(p.Status)
})
.Distinct().ToList().OrderBy(r => r.Text);
return data2.OrderBy(p => p.StatusId).ToList();
Please check above mentioned code.
When you need IN, you have to invert it, and use Contains(). Your post is not very clear, but I think you're asking for something like this (note you need to use a List instead of an array):
List<string> proj = new List<string>(Pid.Split(','));
where (q.IsDelete == false && p.IsDelete == false && p.RoleID != 1 && p.RoleID != 2 && proj.Contains(q.ProId))
I want to write following query in Linq
INSERT INTO INOUTNEW (CODE,INDATE,TIME_DATE1,INOUTFLAG,TIME_FLD1,TIME_FLD2,TIME_FLD3)
SELECT CODE,MIN(INDATE),TIME_DATE1,'I',TIME_FLD1,TIME_FLD2,'31/05/2015' FROM INOUT
WHERE TIME_FLD1='T0003' AND INDATE >= '31/05/2015' AND INDATE <= '31/05/2015'
AND TIME_DATE1='31/05/2015'
GROUP BY CODE,TIME_DATE1,TIME_FLD1,TIME_FLD2
SO I am trying this :-
var data = ctx.tblInOut.Where(m => m.CompanyId == companyId && m.Time_Field1 == item.ShiftCode && m.InDate == StrInStart && m.InDate <= StrInEnd && m.Time_Date1 == InputDate).Select(m =>
new
{
EmployeeId = m.EmployeeId,
InDate = Min(m.InDate),
Time_Date1 = m.Time_Date1,
InOutFlag = m.InOutFlag
}).ToList();
I am stuck in Min Part. How to get Min in Select? And How to add multiple GroupBy in Linq?
Try something like this:
var data = ctx.tblInOut
.Where(m =>
m.CompanyId == companyId &&
m.Time_Field1 == item.ShiftCode &&
m.InDate == StrInStart &&
m.InDate <= StrInEnd &&
m.Time_Date1 == InputDate
)
.GroupBy(m =>
new {
m.Code,
m.Time_Date1,
m.Time_FLD1,
m.Time_FLD2
})
.Select(g =>
new
{
m.Key.Code,
InDate = m.Min(gg => gg.InDate),
m.Key.Time_Date1,
Something = "I",
m.Key.Time_FLD1,
m.Key.Time_FLD2,
SomeDate = "31/05/2015"
}).ToList();
To get Min, you must group first - otherwise it's trying to call Min on a single element.
.Key simply references the key of the group (in this case, a tuple of Code, Date1, Time_FLD1, Time_FLD2)