Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to use a C# .NET diff/comparison library for text files (C++ to be more precise, but it should not matter).
I have found a lot of libraries in the topic but what I need is a something that is part of the .NET library or it comes from Microsoft. The reason of this restriction is that I do not have to go over our company's long open source tool approval process.
Does C# .NET has such feature?
An example for the usage: I have two slightly different .cpp files. I have to create one .cpp file which will have a #ifdef according to the differences of the two files and we can use one file at two places controlled by a predecessor definition.
There is no such built in functionality in any Microsoft .Net library.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking to see if it is possible to look at the source code of well-known functions
I'm new to programming and early on I am being introduced to methods such as System.Console.WriteLine(); and was wondering if it is possible to look at the code of this System in some way (such as using object explorer for instance).
I was told that hovering the cursor over and pressing F12 shows the Assembly and metadata: is there a way to look at exactly what System.Console.WriteLine(); is doing?
Since you do have multiple implementations of .NET you do have multiple implementations of the System.Console.WriteLine()
.NET framework
.NET core
Mono
I suppose you are looking for .NET framework but generally, there are multiple implementations.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
In my project I need to check a bunch of text for spelling mistakes. I get the text over a webservice and have no GUI component from which I could use Spellchecking functionality.
Is there a standard spell checking function that I can use?
Is there a commercial or better open source library that can be used offline?
GNU Aspell is a stable, open-source spelling checker that includes dictionaries for many languages. The library has a C API, which you could presumably use through P/Invoke.
There is a NuGet GNU Aspell package, which claims to provide a .NET wrapper.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a conversion library that can convert my dds files to tga. I found imagemagick and DevIL. But both come with problems, because my specifications are as follows:
The library needs to be a 64-bit dll
The library needs to be managed (writing in C#)
DevIL has a wrapper called DevIL.NET, but this is 32-bits. I already tried to build the source in 64-bit, but I was missing a file and the author doesn't seem to respond at the moment.
ImageMagick doesn't seem to support dds formats.
Does anybody know a good library that complies to my requirements?
There is a way to do this but it's a bit painfull.
Humus provides C++ source code for both tga and dds reading and saving ( Download the latest framework ). You need to convert it to C# but this should be possible without any problems ( i did it once too ).
You'll find the code in the Imaging\Image.h and Imaging\Image.cpp.
Direct link to the Code( ZIP ).
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to represent the chemical structure drawing in my windows application. I found some softwares are available in the market like "BKChem","Metlab","ChemDraw","SMILE (Simplified molecular input line entry specification)","BioChemDraw". but unfortunately i am unable to found any of above's plug in/API's with dot net please let me know. this is very high priority for me for now.
First of all, I'm not at all a .net expert
In the field of chemical structure conversion and drawing, OpenBabel is really the broadest. Unfortunately for you, I only used it from command line, never through API.
BUT, there is a C# API for OpenBabel documented here. And it seams that it can output SVG which is an open drawing standard.
We have written a C# tool for this:
http://chem4word.codeplex.com/
It has been developed over several years and works inside .NET and MS-WORD.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any open source C# compilers written in C#?
I know of Blue, but it was written in 2001 and only supports C# 1:
Mike Stall's 'Blue' C# Compiler
Ideally, I'm looking for one which supports C# 3.0 - but even 2.0 would be fine.
mono's C# compiler is written in C#. If you need to just parse C# source text, you may use NRefactory.
How about the mono C# compiler, which is written in C# itself. You can browse the source here.
Here is another one, but also quite old, from 2002.