I have the following query:
IQueryable<BarcodeQuery> barcodes = db.Barcodes.Select(b => new BarcodeQuery
{
id = b.id,
category_id = b.category_id,
...
checkout = b.Checkouts.Select(c => new CheckoutChild
{
id = c.id,
loanee_id = c.loanee_id,
...
})
.Where(c => c.datein == null)
.FirstOrDefault()
});
And so on. It's based on this model:
public class BarcodeQuery
{
public int id { get; set; }
public int category_id { get; set; }
...
public CheckoutChild checkout { get; set; }
public CheckoutStatus checkoutStatus { get; set; }
}
My question is about CheckoutStatus down there at the bottom. It looks like this:
public class CheckoutStatus
{
public string status { get; set; }
public int daysUntilDue { get; set; }
public int daysOverdue { get; set; }
}
All of those values are derived from information I get from the query--none of them are in the database itself. What is the best way of inserting the CheckoutStatus values into each barcode record?
I have a function that creates the CheckoutStatus values themselves, I just don't know how to get them into the barcode records.
Thanks!
If b has just be created with new, how can b.Checkouts contain something? I do not really understadn what you are trying to do.
EF is converting the lambda expression into a SQL statement. Therefore you can only use expressions that can actually be translated to SQL. Just query the barcodes from the DB and then add the missing information to the barcodes returned in a loop.
var barcodes = db.Barcodes.Select(...).ToList();
foreach (Barcode b in barcodes) {
b.Checkouts = ...
}
Related
I am trying to do something like bellow example but getting exception as -
System.ArgumentException: Expression of type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable1 ' cannot be used for parameter of type 'System.Linq.IQueryable1' of method.
Here is my code and related classes . how can i resolve this issue, is there any way except which a trying to do.
var channels = _channelService.Collection;
var tracks = _trackService.Collection;
var query = from b in tracks.AsQueryable()
select b;
var data = (from q in channels.AsQueryable()
from p in q.Episodes
//from x in trackcoll.AsQueryable()
select new
{
p,
Tracks = query.Where(w => p.Tracks.Contains(w.Id))
}).ToList();
// Related classes
public class ContentBase : IAuditable
{
public string Id { get; set ; }
public string CreatedBy { get ; set ; }
public string CreatedOn { get ; set ; }
public string UpdatedBy { get ; set ; }
public string UpdatedOn { get; set; }
}
public class Channel: ContentBase
{
public List<Episode> Episodes { get; set; }
}
public class Episode: ContentBase
{
// List of track Id
public List<string> Tracks { get; set; }
}
public class Track: ContentBase
{
public string TrackUrl { get; set; }
public string Duration { get; set; }
public string Size { get; set; }
public string ContentType { get; set;
}
MongoDB's LINQ support for joins is limited to equal joins as described here. Your expression cannot be translated into Aggregation Framework's $lookup since there's no equivalent syntax for .Contains().
Therefore you have to run an operation that's closer to Aggregation Framework syntax. One example is a fluent aggregate interface which allows you to run extension methods having the same name as Aggregation Framework's operators. Try:
var q = _channels.Aggregate()
.Unwind(x => x.Episodes)
.Lookup(
foreignCollectionName:"tracks",
localField:"Episodes.Tracks",
foreignField:"_id",
#as:"Tracks");
var result = q.ToList();
Above code will return a List<BsonDocument>
mickl's answer will get you there with the official driver, but if you don't like dealing with bsondocuments and would like to have some degree of type-safety, you can simply do the following with mongodb.entities library (which i'm the author of):
public class EpisodeWithTracks
{
public Track[] Tracks { get; set; }
}
var pipeline = new Template<Channel, EpisodeWithTracks>(#"
[
{
$unwind: '$<Episodes>'
},
{
$lookup: {
from: '<track_collection>',
localField: '<Episodes.Tracks>',
foreignField: '_id',
as: '<Tracks>'
}
}
]")
.Path(c => c.Episodes)
.Tag("track_collection", collectionName)
.Path(c => c.Episodes[0].Tracks)
.PathOfResult(ewt => ewt.Tracks);
var result = DB.Aggregate(pipeline)
.ToList();
here's the wiki page explaining how it works.
So I've got a nested data structure like this:
public class ContractTerm
{
public int ContractId { get; set; }
public string SectionId { get; set; }
public string SubsectionId { get; set; }
public string TermId { get; set; }
public int TermOrder { get; set; }
public TermItem TermNavigation { get; set; }
}
public class TermItem
{
public string SectionId { get; set; }
public string SubsectionId { get; set; }
public string TermId { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
public ICollection<ContractTerm> ContractNavigation { get; set; }
}
I've also got a class to map the section/subsection pairings in a more EF-friendly way (IRL this is an enum with attribute values and a helper, but this class abstracts away some work not necessary to reproduce the issue):
public class Section
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string SectionId { get; set; }
public string SubsectionId { get; set; }
}
Both ContractTerm and TermItem have their own collections in a DbContext, and I'm trying to get a collection of all text entries assigned to specific Sections for a given ContractId. I have the following class to contain it:
public class TextsBySection
{
public string SectionName { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<string> Texts { get; set; }
}
I want to select a collection of TextsBySection, and have something like this:
public class ContractManager
{
//insert constructor initializing MyContext here
private MyContext Context { get; }
public IEnumerable<MyOutputClass> GetTerms(int contractId, IEnumerable<Section> sections)
{
Func<string, string, IEnumerable<string>> getBySection =
(section, subsection) => context.ContractTerms.Include(x => x.TermNavigation)
.Where(x => x.ContractId == contractId
&& x.SectionId == section
&& x.SubsectionId == subsection)
.Select(x => x.TermNavigation.Text);
var result = sections.Select(x => new MyOutputClass
{
SectionName = x.Name,
Texts = getBySection(x.SectionId, x.SubsectionId)
}).ToList();
return result;
}
}
This works fine and dandy, but it hits the database for every Section. I feel like there's got to be a way to use Join and/or GroupBy to make it only query once, but I can't quite see it. Something like this, perhaps:
var result = context.ContractTerms.Include(x => x.TermNavigation)
.Where(x => x.ContractId == contractId)
.Join(sections,
term => //something
section => //something
(term, section) => /*something*/)
If all this were in SQL, selecting the necessary data would be easy:
SELECT sections.name,
term_items.text
FROM contract_terms
JOIN term_items
ON term_items.section_id = contract_terms.section_id
AND term_items.subsection_id = contract_terms.subsection_id
AND term_items.term_id = contract_terms.term_id
JOIN sections --not a real table; just corresponds to sections argument in method
ON sections.section_id = contract_terms.section_id
AND sections.subsection_id = contract_terms.subsection_id
...and then I could group the results in .NET. But I don't understand how to make a single LINQ query that would do the same thing.
I changed my answer, well I would do something like this... maybe this may help you.
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<Section> sections = new List<Section>();
List<ContractTerm> contractTerms = new List<ContractTerm>();
List<TermItem> termItens = new List<TermItem>();
//considering lists have records
List<TextsBySection> result = (from contractTerm in contractTerms
join termItem in termItens
on new
{
contractTerm.SectionId,
contractTerm.SubsectionId,
contractTerm.TermId
}
equals new
{
termItem.SectionId,
termItem.SubsectionId,
termItem.TermId
}
join section in sections
on new
{
contractTerm.SectionId,
contractTerm.SubsectionId
} equals new
{
section.SectionId,
section.SubsectionId
}
select
new
{
sectionName = section.Name,
termItemText = termItem.Text
}).GroupBy(x => x.sectionName).Select(x => new TextsBySection()
{
SectionName = x.Key,
Texts = x.Select(i=> i.termItemText)
}).ToList();
}
Multiple answers have led me to the following 2 solutions, but both of them do not seem to be working correctly.
What I have are 2 objects
public class DatabaseAssignment : AuditableEntity
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string User_Id { get; set; }
public Guid Database_Id { get; set; }
}
public class Database : AuditableEntity
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Server { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public Guid DatabaseClientId { get; set; }
}
Now, the front-end will return all selected Database objects (as IEnumerable) for a given user. I am grabbing all current DatabaseAssignments from the database for the given user and comparing them to the databases by the Database.ID property. My goal is to find the DatabaseAssignments that I can remove from the database. However, my solutions keep returning all DatabaseAssignments to be removed.
if (databases != null)
{
var unitOfWork = new UnitOfWork(_context);
var userDatabaseAssignments = unitOfWork.DatabaseAssignments.GetAll().Where(d => d.User_Id == user.Id);
//var assignmentsToRemove = userDatabaseAssignments.Where(ud => databases.Any(d => d.Id != ud.Database_Id));
var assignmentsToRemove = userDatabaseAssignments.Select(ud => userDatabaseAssignments.FirstOrDefault()).Where(d1 => databases.All(d2 => d2.Id != d1.Database_Id));
var assignmentsToAdd = databases.Select(d => new DatabaseAssignment { User_Id = user.Id, Database_Id = d.Id }).Where(ar => assignmentsToRemove.All(a => a.Database_Id != ar.Database_Id));
if (assignmentsToRemove.Any())
{
unitOfWork.DatabaseAssignments.RemoveRange(assignmentsToRemove);
}
if (assignmentsToAdd.Any())
{
unitOfWork.DatabaseAssignments.AddRange(assignmentsToAdd);
}
unitOfWork.SaveChanges();
}
I think u are looking for an Except extension, have a look at this link
LINQ: Select where object does not contain items from list
Or other way is with contains see below Fiddler link :
https://dotnetfiddle.net/lKyI2F
Can someone suggest me a solution to add condition for reference table items in linq.
I have a master table called TourPackage, which include
public class TourPackage{
public int TourID { get; set; }
public string TourName { get; set; }
public List<IncludedItems> IncludedItems { get; set; }
}
Every tour package contain some selected items reference like
public class IncludedItems {
public int TourID { get; set; }
public int IncludedID { get; set; }
public Included Included { get; set; }
}
All included item should have a reference to Included table for lookup reference
public class Included {
public int IncludedID { get; set; }
public string IncludedValue { get; set; }
}
now i have set of IncludedID like [1,2,3], Is it possible to filter TourPackage based on IncludedID.
Thanks in advance
You can use following code
I have sample array(i.e example) which contains ID's we check if current Id(i.e ele.Included.IncludedID) is present in the array of id's.
listex.Where(x => x.IncludedItems.Any(ele => example.Contains(ele.Included.IncludedID))).ToList();
sample:-
int[] example = new int[3];
example[0] = 123;
example[1] = 456;
example[2] = 789;
List<TourPackage> listex = new List<TourPackage>();
List<TourPackage> filterList = listex.Where(x => x.IncludedItems.Any(ele => example.Contains(ele.Included.IncludedID))).ToList();
Have you tried using something like:
var myIds = new List<int> {123,456};
var result = context.TourPackages
.Where(x => x.IncludedItems.Any(a => a.Included !=null && myIds.Contains(a.Included.IncludedId)))
.ToList();
You might have to include some relations manually depending if you're lazy loading is setup or not.
More info at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj574232(v=vs.113).aspx
Basic idea is similar to Merging Expression Trees to Reuse in Linq Queries.
In my situation, I have two models and DTOs:
public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public Extra Extra { get; set; }
}
public class Extra
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
}
public class UserDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ExtraDto Extra { get; set; }
}
public class ExtraDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
}
and expressions:
Expression<Func<Extra, ExtraDto>> extraSelector = o => new ExtraDto
{
Id = o.Id,
Text = o.Text
};
Expression<Func<User, UserDto>> userSelector = o => new UserDto
{
Id = o.Id,
Name = o.Name
};
Now, I'd like to 'append' extraSelector into userSelector. The pseudo code is like:
var selectorExpression = userSelector.Append(user => user.Extra, extraSelector);
Context.Users.Select(selectorExpression).ToList();
The final expression would be like this:
Expression<Func<User, UserDto>> userSelector = o => new UserDto
{
Id = o.Id,
Name = o.Name,
Extra = new ExtraDto
{
Id = o.Extra.Id,
Text = o.Extra.Text
}
};
I've tried using ExpressionVisitor, but no luck.
Apart from the "merge" of the two selectors, you have to insert the "path" o => o.Extra into the extraSelector and create a new "bind expression" for the property Extra of UserDto.
In fact, i'm playing around with such scenarios within this project, where i've tried to abstract this kind of expression plumbing. Your "merge" would then look like that:
userSelector = extraSelector.Translate()
.Cross<User>(o => o.Extra)
.Apply(o => o.Extra, userSelector);
The Translate extension method is just a little helper to make use of type inference, Cross inserts o => o.Extra into the extraSelector, Apply creates the "bind expression" for the property Extra of UserDto and finally merges the result with userSelector.