We Keep Coding

How to re-start a console application if it crashes?

I have created a console application in C#. How can I program this application so that it will re-start itself after a crash?

If I understand your question correctly, you want to attempt to re-start a console app in the event of a crash. In C# console-apps the method defined as the entry point (usually static void main) is the root of the call stacks in the app. You essentially would need to call that method recursively. You will want to make sure that the app eventually fails if it is in some unintended or unrecoverable state.
For example in the main class:
static int retryCount;
const int numberOfRetries = 3;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
var theApp = new MyApplicationType(args);
theApp.StartMyAppLogic();
}
catch (ExpectedExceptionType expectThisTypeOfException)
{
thisMethodHandlesExceptions(expectThisTypeOfException);
}
catch (AnotherExpectedExceptionType alsoExpectThisTypeOfException)
{
thisMethodHandlesExceptions(alsoExpectThisTypeOfException);
}
catch (Exception unexpectedException)
{
if(retryCount < numberOfRetries)
{
retryCount++;
Main(args);
}
else
{
throw;
}
}
}

You can use a watchdog to process your monitor and restart it if crashed:
see: What's the best way to watchdog a desktop application?
You can use a windows service instead and set it's recovery options as indicated here: https://serverfault.com/questions/48600/how-can-i-automatically-restart-a-windows-service-if-it-crashes
You can use a scheduled task in task manager to start your application periodically , and set it to only start if previous run has ended:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/323527

You could try something like this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
// Application code goes here
}
catch (Exception)
{
var applicationPath = System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location;
Process.Start(applicationPath);
Environment.Exit(Environment.ExitCode);
}
}
Basically, wrap all the code in a try/catch, and if any exceptions occur, the program will retrieve the .exe location with System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location; and then call Process.Start to run the application again.

You should control your console app from another application (watchdog, sheduler, procmon, servman, ...).
E.g. you can create your console app as a service and control it from service manager.

windows service will not stop when I select stop from the services windows C#

I have written a windows service but when I try to stop the service it says that the service cannot be stopped at this time. Here's my whole class:
public partial class RenewalsService : ServiceBase
{
private readonly ManualResetEvent _shutdownEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
private Thread _thread;
public RenewalsService()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.CanStop = true;
}
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
_thread = new Thread(WorkerThread)
{
Name = "Renewals Service Thread",
IsBackground = true
};
_thread.Start();
}
protected override void OnStop()
{
try
{
if (!_shutdownEvent.SafeWaitHandle.IsClosed)
{
_shutdownEvent.Set();
}
if (_thread.IsAlive)
{
if (!_thread.Join(3000))
{
// give the thread 3 seconds to stop
_thread.Abort();
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// _thread.Join may raise an error at this point. If it does we dont care. We dont care about any other exceptions
// since we are already in the process of closing the service.
}
finally
{
IError logger = new Logger();
Exception ex = new Exception("The Renewals service has been stopped.");
logger.Log(this, SeverityEnum.Warning, ex);
Environment.ExitCode = 0;
Environment.Exit(Environment.ExitCode);
}
}
private void WorkerThread()
{
try
{
while (!_shutdownEvent.WaitOne(1))
{
string timeToRun = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["RunTime"];
string[] timeStrings = timeToRun.Split(':');
TimeSpan runtime = new TimeSpan(0, Int32.Parse(timeStrings[0]), Int32.Parse(timeStrings[1]), Int32.Parse(timeStrings[2]));
if (DateTime.Today.TimeOfDay.Hours == runtime.Hours &&
DateTime.Today.TimeOfDay.Minutes == runtime.Minutes)
{
Renewals renewals = new Renewals();
renewals.GenerateRenewal();
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
IError logger = new Logger();
logger.Log(this, SeverityEnum.Warning, ex);
this.OnStop();
}
}
}
What's missing to ensure the user can stop the service.

Your code looks ok to me, so here's a couple of things to check.
First, does the GenerateRenewal() method take a long time to complete? If so, you might need to periodically check _shutdownEvent inside that method for a timely shutdown. Of course, you've marked the thread as a background thread so it should shut down when you tell the service to stop anyway. I haven't seen background threads hold up process termination, but I guess there's always that chance.
Second, the more likely culprit to me is that the service has already shut down due to an exception. The Services console doesn't automatically refresh when a service shuts down, so it's possible you see the Stop link available to you when it shouldn't be. If you hit F5, the console will refresh, and if your service has stopped, the Start link should be the only one available. Check your log files to see if your exception handlers have been triggered.
UPDATE
So it looks like your WorkerThread() method is throwing an exception, which causes the service to stop. This explains why the Stop link is giving you the error message when you click it.
Providing you have sufficient permissions on your box, use this link to debug your service to find out why the exception is occurring.
HTH

The base ServiceBase class calls your overridden virtual method OnStop() when the Windows Service Control Manager ("the SCM") has sent the service a "Stop" command. In the method's implementation you are supposed to do whatever is necessary to get your service to a stopped state, then return from the method back to the ServiceBase class, which handles the interaction with the SCM, in this case to tell the SCM that your service is now stopped. The SCM will decide when your service process should be terminated, and the ServiceBase class handles that without you needing to do anything explicit.
For a well-behaved service, you should either just return at the end of your OnStop method, or throw an exception. The ServiceBase class will handle things appropriately, including logging your exception, if you have thrown one, as an error in the Windows Event Log. If your method may take a while to get your service stopped, you should call base.RequestAdditionalTime() at the appropriate points, so the base class can tell the SCM that you haven't just hung, your service is in the process of stopping.
I think your main problem lies in these lines:
Environment.ExitCode = 0;
Environment.Exit(Environment.ExitCode);
You never return to the base class at all... so the ServiceBase class never has a chance to respond gracefully to the SCM... you are just unilaterally terminating the process hosting your service. This is not what a well-behaved Windows service does.
The ServiceBase class is designed to be able to support multiple services hosted in a single service process. Individual services should not concern themselves with the lifetime of the host service process, only with the logical state of their own service.

How to avoid race condition when acquiring a mutex?

I am using a named system mutex to synchronise 2 processes. This is how I am currently acquiring a mutex within my application:
using System.Threading;
public static bool AcquireMutex()
{
// Protect against double acquisitions
if (MyMutex != null)
{
throw new ApplicationException("Failed to acquire mutex");
}
try
{
// See if a named system mutex has already been created - if it has,
// wait a short amount of time for its release.
MyMutex = Mutex.OpenExisting(MutexName);
if (!MyMutex.WaitOne(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2), false))
{
// MyMutex still being held
MyMutex = null;
return false;
}
}
catch
{
// MyMutex doesn't exist so create it
MyMutex = new Mutex(true, MutexName);
}
return true;
}
OpenExisting will throw an exception if the named system mutex with MutexName doesn't exist, allowing my application to create it.
However, there seems to be a race condition here - if OpenExisting throws, there is a small window before the call to new Mutex where the other application may have acquired the mutex.
What is the best way to avoid this race condition and make this code more reliable?
A colleague mentioned that he was using CreateMutex from the Win32 Platform SDK in his code (the other process which needs to be synchronised). This doesn't seem to be natively supported by the .NET Framework, however. So I'm not sure it's the best solution for my code.
Update
Based on the answer from #David Schwartz, here is my new code:
public static bool AcquireMutex()
{
// Protect against double acquisitions
if (MyMutex != null)
{
throw new ApplicationException("Failed to acquire mutex");
}
bool createdNew;
MyMutex = new Mutex(true, MutexName, out createdNew);
if (createdNew)
{
// Mutex was created so ownership is guaranteed; no need to wait on it.
return true;
}
try
{
if (!MyMutex.WaitOne(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2), false))
{
MyMutex = null;
return false;
}
}
catch (AbandonedMutexException)
{
// Other application was aborted, which led to an abandoned mutex.
// This is fine, as we have still successfully acquired the mutex.
}
return true;
}

There's a constructor specifically designed for this purpose. From the docs:
createdNew
Type: System.Boolean
When this method returns, contains a Boolean that is true if a local mutex was created (that is, if name is null or an empty string) or if the specified named system mutex was created; false if the specified named system mutex already existed. This parameter is passed uninitialized.

How do I programmatically use the "using" keyword in C#?

I have some System.Diagnotics.Processes to run. I'd like to call the close method on them automatically. Apparently the "using" keyword does this for me.
Is this the way to use the using keyword?
foreach(string command in S) // command is something like "c:\a.exe"
{
try
{
using(p = Process.Start(command))
{
// I literally put nothing in here.
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// notify of process failure
}
}
I'd like to start multiple processes to run concurrently.

using(p = Process.Start(command))
This will compile, as the Process class implements IDisposable, however you actually want to call the Close method.
Logic would have it that the Dispose method would call Close for you, and by digging into the CLR using reflector, we can see that it does in fact do this for us. So far so good.
Again using reflector, I looked at what the Close method does - it releases the underlying native win32 process handle, and clears some member variables. This (releasing external resources) is exactly what the IDisposable pattern is supposed to do.
However I'm not sure if this is what you want to achieve here.
Releasing the underlying handles simply says to windows 'I am no longer interested in tracking this other process'. At no point does it actually cause the other process to quit, or cause your process to wait.
If you want to force them quit, you'll need to use the p.Kill() method on the processes - however be advised it is never a good idea to kill processes as they can't clean up after themselves, and may leave behind corrupt files, and so on.
If you want to wait for them to quit on their own, you could use p.WaitForExit() - however this will only work if you're waiting for one process at a time. If you want to wait for them all concurrently, it gets tricky.
Normally you'd use WaitHandle.WaitAll for this, but as there's no way to get a WaitHandle object out of a System.Diagnostics.Process, you can't do this (seriously, wtf were microsoft thinking?).
You could spin up a thread for each process, and call `WaitForExit in those threads, but this is also the wrong way to do it.
You instead have to use p/invoke to access the native win32 WaitForMultipleObjects function.
Here's a sample (which I've tested, and actually works)
[System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImport( "kernel32.dll" )]
static extern uint WaitForMultipleObjects( uint nCount, IntPtr[] lpHandles, bool bWaitAll, uint dwMilliseconds );
static void Main( string[] args )
{
var procs = new Process[] {
Process.Start( #"C:\Program Files\ruby\bin\ruby.exe", "-e 'sleep 2'" ),
Process.Start( #"C:\Program Files\ruby\bin\ruby.exe", "-e 'sleep 3'" ),
Process.Start( #"C:\Program Files\ruby\bin\ruby.exe", "-e 'sleep 4'" ) };
// all started asynchronously in the background
var handles = procs.Select( p => p.Handle ).ToArray();
WaitForMultipleObjects( (uint)handles.Length, handles, true, uint.MaxValue ); // uint.maxvalue waits forever
}

For reference:
The using keyword for IDisposable objects:
using(Writer writer = new Writer())
{
writer.Write("Hello");
}
is just compiler syntax. What it compiles down to is:
Writer writer = null;
try
{
writer = new Writer();
writer.Write("Hello");
}
finally
{
if( writer != null)
{
((IDisposable)writer).Dispose();
}
}
using is a bit better since the compiler prevents you from reassigning the writer reference inside the using block.
The framework guidelines Section 9.3.1 p. 256 state:
CONSIDER providing method Close(), in addition to the Dispose(), if close is standard terminology in the area.
In your code example, the outer try-catch is unnecessary (see above).
Using probably isn't doing what you want to here since Dispose() gets called as soon as p goes out of scope. This doesn't shut down the process (tested).
Processes are independent, so unless you call p.WaitForExit() they spin off and do their own thing completely independent of your program.
Counter-intuitively, for a Process, Close() only releases resources but leaves the program running. CloseMainWindow() can work for some processes, and Kill() will work to kill any process. Both CloseMainWindow() and Kill() can throw exceptions, so be careful if you're using them in a finally block.
To finish, here's some code that waits for processes to finish but doesn't kill off the processes when an exception occurs. I'm not saying it's better than Orion Edwards, just different.
List<System.Diagnostics.Process> processList = new List<System.Diagnostics.Process>();
try
{
foreach (string command in Commands)
{
processList.Add(System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(command));
}
// loop until all spawned processes Exit normally.
while (processList.Any())
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); // wait and see.
List<System.Diagnostics.Process> finished = (from o in processList
where o.HasExited
select o).ToList();
processList = processList.Except(finished).ToList();
foreach (var p in finished)
{
// could inspect exit code and exit time.
// note many properties are unavailable after process exits
p.Close();
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// log the exception
throw;
}
finally
{
foreach (var p in processList)
{
if (p != null)
{
//if (!p.HasExited)
// processes will still be running
// but CloseMainWindow() or Kill() can throw exceptions
p.Dispose();
}
}
}
I didn't bother Kill()'ing off the processes because the code starts get even uglier. Read the msdn documentation for more information.

try
{
foreach(string command in S) // command is something like "c:\a.exe"
{
using(p = Process.Start(command))
{
// I literally put nothing in here.
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// notify of process failure
}
The reason it works is because when the exception happens, the variable p falls out of scope and thus it's Dispose method is called that closes the process is how that would go. Additionally, I would think you'd want to spin a thread off for each command rather than wait for an executable to finish before going on to the next one.

How can I check for a running process per user session?

I have a .NET application that I only allow to run a single process at a time of, however that app is used on Citrix boxes from time to time, and as such, can be run by multiple users on the same machine.
I want to check and make sure that the application is only running once per user session, because right now if user A is running the app, then user B gets the "App already in use" message, and should not.
This is what I have now that checks for the running process:
Process[] p = Process.GetProcessesByName(Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName);
if (p.Length > 1)
{
#if !DEBUG
allowedToOpen &= false;
errorMessage +=
string.Format("{0} is already running.{1}", Constants.AssemblyTitle, Environment.NewLine);
#endif
}

EDIT: Improved the answer according to this cw question ...
You can use a mutex for checking wether the app already runs:
using( var mutex = new Mutex( false, AppGuid ) )
{
try
{
try
{
if( !mutex.WaitOne( 0, false ) )
{
MessageBox.Show( "Another instance is already running." );
return;
}
}
catch( AbandonedMutexException )
{
// Log the fact the mutex was abandoned in another process,
// it will still get aquired
}
Application.Run(new Form1());
}
finally
{
mutex.ReleaseMutex();
}
}
Important is the AppGuid - you could make it depend on the user.
Maybe you like to read this article: the misunderstood mutex

As tanascius already say, you can use the Mutex.
On a server that is running Terminal Services, a named system mutex can have two levels of visibility. If its name begins with the prefix "Global\", the mutex is visible in all terminal server sessions. If its name begins with the prefix "Local\", the mutex is visible only in the terminal server session where it was created.
Source: msdn, Mutex Class

Just stating the obvious - although Mutex is usually considered better solution, you can still solve the single-instance-per-session issue without Mutex - just test the SessionId as well.
private static bool ApplicationIsAlreadyRunning()
{
var currentProcess = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
var processes = Process.GetProcessesByName(currentProcess.ProcessName);
// test if there's another process running in current session.
var intTotalRunningInCurrentSession = processes.Count(prc => prc.SessionId == currentProcess.SessionId);
return intTotalRunningInCurrentSession > 1;
}
Source (no Linq)

If Form1 launches non-background threads, and that Form1 exits, you've got a problem: the mutex is released but the process is still there. Something along the lines below is better IMHO:
static class Program {
private static Mutex mutex;
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main() {
bool createdNew = true;
mutex = new Mutex(true, #"Global\Test", out createdNew);
if (createdNew) {
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new Form1());
}
else {
MessageBox.Show(
"Application is already running",
"Error",
MessageBoxButtons.OK,
MessageBoxIcon.Error
);
}
}
}
The mutex won't be released as long as the primary application domain is still up. And that will be around as long as the application is running.